Follow TV Tropes

Following

History DethroningMoment / TheHungerGames

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Starshock: The Hunger Games was great... Until it turns out that the rebels are worse than the Capitol. And how do we know that? [[SarcasmMode Because that fount of good judgement and truth President Snow told Katniss so.]] Sure, he promised Katniss he wouldn't lie to her, but do you really think he ever intended to keep that promise? I sure don't, he just made it so he could manipulate Katniss. I personally feel that the Capitol framed the rebels, so that Snow could take Coin down with him. And Coin's just such a great character, so why'd they have to go and ruin her characterization? I was really liking her characterization as a MagnificentBitch-KnightTemplar-DarkMessiah, but nope, she's just another flat villain, and one with even less characterization than Snow. My real beef with the ending is that it's such a ShockingSwerve.

to:

* Starshock: The Hunger Games was great... Until it turns out that the rebels are worse than the Capitol. And how do we know that? [[SarcasmMode Because that fount of good judgement and truth President Snow told Katniss so.]] Sure, he promised Katniss he wouldn't lie to her, but do you really think he ever intended to keep that promise? I sure don't, he just made it so he could manipulate Katniss. I personally feel that the Capitol framed the rebels, so that Snow could take Coin down with him. And Coin's just such a great character, so why'd they have to go and ruin her characterization? I was really liking her characterization as a MagnificentBitch-KnightTemplar-DarkMessiah, but nope, she's just another flat villain, and one with even less characterization than Snow. My real beef with the ending is that it's such a ShockingSwerve.an AssPull.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AurumAstrum: The direction for Prim's character in the first movie. In the book, her bright personality helps the reader easily understand why Katniss would want to protect her. The first movie makes Prim an incredibly dreary and somber child, which could disconnect the audience from Katniss' biggest purpose. One has to wonder what the point of this change was other than to make District 12 as sad as possible at the start of the movie.

to:

* AurumAstrum: The direction for Prim's character in the first movie. In the book, her bright personality helps the reader easily understand why Katniss would want to protect her. The first movie makes Prim an incredibly dreary and somber child, which could disconnect the audience from Katniss' biggest purpose. One has to wonder what the point of this change was other than to make District 12 as sad as possible at the start of the movie.movie.
* Tropers/Papyru30: The decision to split Mockingjay into 2 movies was alright for me but the the fact that Part 2 was just going to be the attack on the capital ruined it for me since it decided that action was more important than story or character for the finale.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AurumAstrum: The direction for Prim's character in the first movie. In the book, her bright personality helps the reader easily understand why Katniss would want to protect her. The first movie makes Prim an incredibly dreary and somber child, which could disconnect the audience from Katniss' biggest purpose. One has to wonder what the point of this change was other than to make District 12 as sad as possible at the start of the movie.
* Tropers/{{Owlorange1995}}: The moment when [[spoiler: Finnick reveals that he and other winners were prostituted by the Capitol]] was the moment when I decided that ''Mockingjay'' was unsalvageable. [[spoiler: GratuitousRape]] is in full effect here; Finnick describes it when he's offhandedly preparing a radio broadcast, it's hardly mentioned again after he does, [[spoiler: and now that Finnick's dead and the series is done, we will never know how he and the others coped with it and how they found support!]] If you're going to try to make your story more "adult," you have to do more than just throw in adult elements; give them the weight and respect these issues deserve! [[spoiler: ''Rape is not something to be taken lightly''.]]

to:

* Tropers/{{Owlorange1995}}: The moment when [[spoiler: Finnick reveals that he and other winners were prostituted by the Capitol]] was the moment when I decided that ''Mockingjay'' was unsalvageable. [[spoiler: GratuitousRape]] is in full effect here; Finnick describes it when he's offhandedly preparing a radio broadcast, it's hardly mentioned again after he does, [[spoiler: and now that Finnick's dead and the series is done, we will never know how he and the others coped with it and how they found support!]] If you're going to try to make your story more "adult", you have to do more than just throw in adult elements; give them the weight and respect these issues deserve! [[spoiler:''Rape is not something to be taken lightly''.]]
* AurumAstrum: The direction for Prim's character in the first movie. In the book, her bright personality helps the reader easily understand why Katniss would want to protect her. The first movie makes Prim an incredibly dreary and somber child, which could disconnect the audience from Katniss' biggest purpose. One has to wonder what the point of this change was other than to make District 12 as sad as possible at the start of the movie.
* Tropers/{{Owlorange1995}}: The moment when [[spoiler: Finnick reveals that he and other winners were prostituted by the Capitol]] was the moment when I decided that ''Mockingjay'' was unsalvageable. [[spoiler: GratuitousRape]] is in full effect here; Finnick describes it when he's offhandedly preparing a radio broadcast, it's hardly mentioned again after he does, [[spoiler: and now that Finnick's dead and the series is done, we will never know how he and the others coped with it and how they found support!]] If you're going to try to make your story more "adult," you have to do more than just throw in adult elements; give them the weight and respect these issues deserve! [[spoiler: ''Rape is not something to be taken lightly''.]]
movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheLuckyCat: Haymitch's line from ''Catching Fire'' when he tells Katniss "you could live a thousand years and not deserve that boy" when it's announced Katniss and Peeta will go back into the Quarter Quell. Um, what? Now, Haymitch is one of my favourite characters in the series along with Johanna and Effie, but seriously, Haymitch, what are you basing this on? Katniss saves Peeta's ass in the Hunger Games, multiple times- looking at him when he was too injured to run, risking her life to get medicine for him, preventing him from accidentally swallowing Nightlock berries...and this still isn't good enough, apparently. Later on in the Quarter Quell, she still ends up saving him over and over again, so Peeta was an idiot for taking Haymitch's place to start with. Leading Katniss to once again insist on sacrificing herself for Peeta, carrying a pretty [[{{Squick}} Squicky]] undertone that in order to have a relationship, the woman must put the man before herself at all times, even at the expense of her own life, or she's a selfish bitch. And this was written by a woman, for bonus disturbing.

to:

* TheLuckyCat: Haymitch's line from ''Catching Fire'' when he tells Katniss "you could live a thousand years and not deserve that boy" when it's announced Katniss and Peeta will go back into the Quarter Quell. Um, what? Now, Haymitch is one of my favourite characters in the series along with Johanna and Effie, but seriously, Haymitch, what are you basing this on? Katniss saves Peeta's ass in the Hunger Games, multiple times- looking at him when he was too injured to run, risking her life to get medicine for him, preventing him from accidentally swallowing Nightlock berries... and this still isn't good enough, apparently. Later on in the Quarter Quell, she still ends up saving him over and over again, so Peeta was an idiot for taking Haymitch's place to start with. Leading Katniss to once again insist on sacrificing herself for Peeta, carrying a pretty [[{{Squick}} Squicky]] undertone that in order to have a relationship, the woman must put the man before herself at all times, even at the expense of her own life, or she's a selfish bitch. And this was written by a woman, for bonus disturbing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tropers/{{terlwyth}}: Katniss' vow to force the Capitol children into Literature/TheHungerGames for retribution after the Capitol is defeated, claiming it to be [[spoiler: "For Prim"]]. Even after witnessing the horrors of the Games, her earlier nature implied she wouldn't wish the Games on anyone, and when you realize [[spoiler: Prim]] was a caring soul. ''Mockingjay'' was a letdown overall, but this is horrible.
* Tropers/{{TimeTravelerJessica}} - For me its not so much that she voted on it (I can see her doing that to draw Coin out or something) but that the book never bothered to explain what ended up happening with the final Hunger Games - I can't imagine the new government actually forced them to go through with it but it would have been nice to explicitly state that the supposed good guys didn't turn around and force children into the games.

to:

* Tropers/{{terlwyth}}: Katniss' vow to force the Capitol children into Literature/TheHungerGames for retribution after the Capitol is defeated, claiming it to be [[spoiler: "For Prim"]]. Even after witnessing the horrors of the Games, her earlier nature implied she wouldn't wish the Games on anyone, and when then you realize [[spoiler: Prim]] was a caring soul. ''Mockingjay'' was a letdown overall, but this is horrible.
* Tropers/{{TimeTravelerJessica}} - For me its it's not so much that she voted on it (I can see her doing that to draw Coin out or something) but that the book never bothered to explain what ended up happening with the final Hunger Games - I can't imagine the new government actually forced them to go through with it but it would have been nice to explicitly state that the supposed good guys didn't turn around and force children into the games.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

These are [[DarthWiki/DethroningMomentOfSuck moments]] from Literature/TheHungerGames that should have been selected as tributes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None





* AurumAstrum: The direction for Prim's character in the first movie. In the book, her bright personality helps the reader easily understand why Katniss would want to protect her. The first movie makes Prim an incredibly dreary and somber child, which could disconnect the audience from Katniss' biggest purpose. One has to wonder what the point of this change was other than to make District 12 as sad as possible at the start of the movie.

to:

* AurumAstrum: The direction for Prim's character in the first movie. In the book, her bright personality helps the reader easily understand why Katniss would want to protect her. The first movie makes Prim an incredibly dreary and somber child, which could disconnect the audience from Katniss' biggest purpose. One has to wonder what the point of this change was other than to make District 12 as sad as possible at the start of the movie.movie.
* Tropers/{{Owlorange1995}}: The moment when [[spoiler: Finnick reveals that he and other winners were prostituted by the Capitol]] was the moment when I decided that ''Mockingjay'' was unsalvageable. [[spoiler: GratuitousRape]] is in full effect here; Finnick describes it when he's offhandedly preparing a radio broadcast, it's hardly mentioned again after he does, [[spoiler: and now that Finnick's dead and the series is done, we will never know how he and the others coped with it and how they found support!]] If you're going to try to make your story more "adult," you have to do more than just throw in adult elements; give them the weight and respect these issues deserve! [[spoiler: ''Rape is not something to be taken lightly''.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Starshock: The Hunger Games was great... Until it turns out that the rebels are worse than the Capitol. And how do we know that? [[SarcasmMode Because that fount of good judgement and truth President Snow told Katniss so.]] Sure, he promised Katniss he wouldn't lie to her, but do you really think he ever intended to keep that promise? I sure don't, he just made it so he could manipulate Katniss. I personally feel that the Capitol framed the rebels, so that Snow could take Coin down with him. And Coin's just such a great character, so why'd they have to go and ruin her characterization? I was really liking her characterization as a MagnificentBitch-KnightTemplar-DarkMessiah, but nope, she's just another flat villain, and one with even less characterization as Snow. My real beef with the ending is that it's such a ShockingSwerve.

to:

* Starshock: The Hunger Games was great... Until it turns out that the rebels are worse than the Capitol. And how do we know that? [[SarcasmMode Because that fount of good judgement and truth President Snow told Katniss so.]] Sure, he promised Katniss he wouldn't lie to her, but do you really think he ever intended to keep that promise? I sure don't, he just made it so he could manipulate Katniss. I personally feel that the Capitol framed the rebels, so that Snow could take Coin down with him. And Coin's just such a great character, so why'd they have to go and ruin her characterization? I was really liking her characterization as a MagnificentBitch-KnightTemplar-DarkMessiah, but nope, she's just another flat villain, and one with even less characterization as than Snow. My real beef with the ending is that it's such a ShockingSwerve.

Added: 90

Changed: 16

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Keep in mind:

to:

%%
%%
%% STAFF NOTICE
%%
%% Please do not add an image to this page. Thank you.
%%
%%

Keep in mind:



* AurumAstrum: The direction for Prim's character in the first movie. In the book, her bright personality helps the reader easily understand why Katniss would want to protect her. The first movie makes Prim an incredibly dreary and somber child, which could disconnect the audience from Katniss' biggest purpose. One has to wonder what the point of this change was other than to make District 12 as sad as possible at the start of the movie.

to:

* AurumAstrum: The direction for Prim's character in the first movie. In the book, her bright personality helps the reader easily understand why Katniss would want to protect her. The first movie makes Prim an incredibly dreary and somber child, which could disconnect the audience from Katniss' biggest purpose. One has to wonder what the point of this change was other than to make District 12 as sad as possible at the start of the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*AurumAstrum: The direction for Prim's character in the first movie. In the book, her bright personality helps the reader easily understand why Katniss would want to protect her. The first movie makes Prim an incredibly dreary and somber child, which could disconnect the audience from Katniss' biggest purpose. One has to wonder what the point of this change was other than to make District 12 as sad as possible at the start of the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Flat Whats don\'t have question marks.


* TheLuckyCat: Haymitch's line from ''Catching Fire'' when he tells Katniss "you could live a thousand years and not deserve that boy" when it's announced Katniss and Peeta will go back into the Quarter Quell. Um, [[FlatWhat what?]] Now, Haymitch is one of my favourite characters in the series along with Johanna and Effie, but seriously, Haymitch, what are you basing this on? Katniss saves Peeta's ass in the Hunger Games, multiple times- looking at him when he was too injured to run, risking her life to get medicine for him, preventing him from accidentally swallowing Nightlock berries...and this still isn't good enough, apparently. Later on in the Quarter Quell, she still ends up saving him over and over again, so Peeta was an idiot for taking Haymitch's place to start with. Leading Katniss to once again insist on sacrificing herself for Peeta, carrying a pretty [[{{Squick}} Squicky]] undertone that in order to have a relationship, the woman must put the man before herself at all times, even at the expense of her own life, or she's a selfish bitch. And this was written by a woman, for bonus disturbing.

to:

* TheLuckyCat: Haymitch's line from ''Catching Fire'' when he tells Katniss "you could live a thousand years and not deserve that boy" when it's announced Katniss and Peeta will go back into the Quarter Quell. Um, [[FlatWhat what?]] what? Now, Haymitch is one of my favourite characters in the series along with Johanna and Effie, but seriously, Haymitch, what are you basing this on? Katniss saves Peeta's ass in the Hunger Games, multiple times- looking at him when he was too injured to run, risking her life to get medicine for him, preventing him from accidentally swallowing Nightlock berries...and this still isn't good enough, apparently. Later on in the Quarter Quell, she still ends up saving him over and over again, so Peeta was an idiot for taking Haymitch's place to start with. Leading Katniss to once again insist on sacrificing herself for Peeta, carrying a pretty [[{{Squick}} Squicky]] undertone that in order to have a relationship, the woman must put the man before herself at all times, even at the expense of her own life, or she's a selfish bitch. And this was written by a woman, for bonus disturbing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheLuckyCat: Haymitch's line from ''Catching Fire'' when he tells Katniss "you could live a thousand years and not deserve that boy" when it's announced Katniss and Peeta will go back into the Quarter Quell. Um, what? Now, Haymitch is one of my favourite characters in the series along with Johanna and Effie, but seriously, Haymitch, what are you basing this on? Katniss saves Peeta's ass in the Hunger Games, multiple times- looking at him when he was too injured to run, risking her life to get medicine for him, preventing him from accidentally swallowing Nightlock berries...and this still isn't good enough, apparently. Later on in the Quarter Quell, she still ends up saving him over and over again, so Peeta was an idiot for taking Haymitch's place to start with. Leading Katniss to once again insist on sacrificing herself for Peeta, carrying a pretty [[{{Squick Squicky}}]] undertone that in order to have a relationship, the woman must put the man before herself at all times, even at the expense of her own life, or she's a selfish bitch. And this was written by a woman, for bonus disturbing.

to:

* TheLuckyCat: Haymitch's line from ''Catching Fire'' when he tells Katniss "you could live a thousand years and not deserve that boy" when it's announced Katniss and Peeta will go back into the Quarter Quell. Um, what? [[FlatWhat what?]] Now, Haymitch is one of my favourite characters in the series along with Johanna and Effie, but seriously, Haymitch, what are you basing this on? Katniss saves Peeta's ass in the Hunger Games, multiple times- looking at him when he was too injured to run, risking her life to get medicine for him, preventing him from accidentally swallowing Nightlock berries...and this still isn't good enough, apparently. Later on in the Quarter Quell, she still ends up saving him over and over again, so Peeta was an idiot for taking Haymitch's place to start with. Leading Katniss to once again insist on sacrificing herself for Peeta, carrying a pretty [[{{Squick Squicky}}]] [[{{Squick}} Squicky]] undertone that in order to have a relationship, the woman must put the man before herself at all times, even at the expense of her own life, or she's a selfish bitch. And this was written by a woman, for bonus disturbing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheLuckyCat: Haymitch's line from ''Catching Fire'' when he tells Katniss "you could live a thousand years and not deserve that boy" when it's announced Katniss and Peeta will go back into the Quarter Quell. Um, what? Now, Haymitch is one of my favourite characters in the series along with Johanna and Effie, but seriously, Haymitch, what are you basing this on? Katniss saved Peeta's ass in the Hunger Games, multiple times- looking at him when he was too injured to run, risking her life to get medicine for him, preventing him from accidentally swallowing Nightlock berries...and this still isn't good enough, apparently. Leading Katniss to once again insist on sacrificing herself for Peeta, carrying a pretty {{Squick Squicky}} undertone that in order to have a relationship, the woman must put the man before herself at all times or she's a selfish bitch. And this was written by a woman, for bonus disturbing.

to:

* TheLuckyCat: Haymitch's line from ''Catching Fire'' when he tells Katniss "you could live a thousand years and not deserve that boy" when it's announced Katniss and Peeta will go back into the Quarter Quell. Um, what? Now, Haymitch is one of my favourite characters in the series along with Johanna and Effie, but seriously, Haymitch, what are you basing this on? Katniss saved saves Peeta's ass in the Hunger Games, multiple times- looking at him when he was too injured to run, risking her life to get medicine for him, preventing him from accidentally swallowing Nightlock berries...and this still isn't good enough, apparently. Later on in the Quarter Quell, she still ends up saving him over and over again, so Peeta was an idiot for taking Haymitch's place to start with. Leading Katniss to once again insist on sacrificing herself for Peeta, carrying a pretty {{Squick Squicky}} [[{{Squick Squicky}}]] undertone that in order to have a relationship, the woman must put the man before herself at all times times, even at the expense of her own life, or she's a selfish bitch. And this was written by a woman, for bonus disturbing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheLuckyCat: Haymitch's line from ''Catching Fire'' when he tells Katniss "you could live a thousand years and not deserve that boy" when it's announced Katniss and Peeta will go back into the Quarter Quell. Um, what? Now, Haymitch is one of my favourite characters in the series along with Johanna and Effie, but seriously, Haymitch, what are you basing this on? Katniss saved Peeta's ass in the Hunger Games, multiple times- looking at him when he was too injured to run, risking her life to get medicine for him, preventing him from accidentally swallowing Nightlock berries...and this still isn't good enough, apparently. Leading Katniss to once again insist on sacrificing herself for Peeta, carrying a pretty {{Squick Squicky}} undertone that in order to have a relationship, the woman must put the man before herself at all times or she's a selfish bitch. And this was written by a woman, for bonus disturbing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Starshock: The Hunger Games was great... Until it turns out that the rebels are worse than the Capitol. And how do we know that? [[SarcasmMode Because that fount of good judgement and truth President Snow told Katniss so.]] Sure, he promised Katniss he wouldn't lie to her, but do you really think he ever intended to keep that promise? I sure don't, he just made it so he could manipulate Katniss. I personally feel that the Capitol framed the rebels, so that Snow could take Coin down with him. And Coin's just such a great character, so why'd they have to go and ruin her characterization? I really liking her characterization as a MagnificentBitch-KnightTemplar-DarkMessiah, but nope, she's just another flat villain, and one with even less characterization as Snow. My real beef with the ending is that it's such a ShockingSwerve.

to:

* Starshock: The Hunger Games was great... Until it turns out that the rebels are worse than the Capitol. And how do we know that? [[SarcasmMode Because that fount of good judgement and truth President Snow told Katniss so.]] Sure, he promised Katniss he wouldn't lie to her, but do you really think he ever intended to keep that promise? I sure don't, he just made it so he could manipulate Katniss. I personally feel that the Capitol framed the rebels, so that Snow could take Coin down with him. And Coin's just such a great character, so why'd they have to go and ruin her characterization? I was really liking her characterization as a MagnificentBitch-KnightTemplar-DarkMessiah, but nope, she's just another flat villain, and one with even less characterization as Snow. My real beef with the ending is that it's such a ShockingSwerve.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tropers/{{WandaGinnyGreenleaf1500}}: My beef with the epoligue is that [[spoiler:Peeta marries Katniss at all]]. I mean, what? Their entire relationship is summed up by being fake. Katniss pretends to love him because there is a gun pointed at her head that will go off if she doesn't keep up the facade. Not to mention [[spoiler:Peeta is still having fits where he tries to kill her.]] Peeta's entitlement complex towards Katniss did nothing to endear him to me either. And yet, this is portrayed as the best, most romantic and sweet ending. That was the worst point of this entire book.

to:

* Tropers/{{WandaGinnyGreenleaf1500}}: My beef with the epoligue epilogue is that [[spoiler:Peeta marries Katniss at all]]. I mean, what? Their entire relationship is summed up by being fake. Katniss pretends to love him because there is a gun pointed at her head that will go off if she doesn't keep up the facade. Not to mention [[spoiler:Peeta is still having fits where he tries to kill her.]] Peeta's entitlement complex towards Katniss did nothing to endear him to me either. And yet, this is portrayed as the best, most romantic and sweet ending. That was the worst point of this entire book.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Tropers/{{akanesarumara}}: Seconded. It was from its very beginning a facade, her and Peeta, and no time changed that. Sure she may have considered him a friend at the end, but I never ever got the vibe that she actually loves him. Actually the same with Gale, now that I think about it. The romance was truly the worst thing about these books.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Winters15: Agreed. This is still the worst moment of the series, in my opinion, coupled with her tactless comment about him kissing another pair of lips a few chapters later, as if she hasn't kissed anyone else. It was a convenient way to end the LoveTriangle.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Tropers/{{BlueButterfly}}: Similarly disappointed by the above; it felt very poorly portrayed considering the character. [[spoiler:At this point Finnick has everything to lose - a potential future, his wife, and even a child, about whom he may or may not know. And yet he dies so that Katniss can save the day, which she doesn't. It seemed an utterly pointless and undignified end to someone who received so much CharacterDevelopment (supposed TheCasanova turns out to have a one true love) and HiddenDepths (the scene where he explains the objectification and abuse ''and'' utilizes secret-collecting).]]

to:

** Tropers/{{BlueButterfly}}: Similarly disappointed by the above; it felt very poorly portrayed considering the character. [[spoiler:At this point Finnick has everything to lose - a potential future, his wife, and even a child, about whom he may or may not know. And yet he dies so that Katniss can save the day, which she doesn't. It seemed an utterly pointless and undignified end to someone who received so much CharacterDevelopment (supposed TheCasanova turns out to have a one true love) and HiddenDepths (the scene where he explains the objectification and abuse ''and'' abuse, and utilizes secret-collecting).]]



* Tropers/{{Zsuzsa}}: The Quarter Quell and putting Katniss back in the arena for the second book. First, it meant that rather than getting a chance to see the Games and the rest of the Capitol from a new perspective, we instead get basically a repetition of all the major points from the first book. Second, it was the beginning of turning Katniss, who had been a very active and decisive heroine in the first book, into a passive character whose decisions and actions don't matter to the overall plot. Imagine that instead, the Games in the second book happen with Katniss as a mentor. We see another angle to them, and Katniss has to grow up as she needs to learn the skills of a mentor, things that don't come naturally. Meanwhile, she learns about the Rebellion, and ''she'' decides whether or not she wants to get involved and to what extent. It seems like it could have been a much stronger story rather than the "Katniss gets pulled back into the arena and then is dragged into the Rebellion like a rag doll" that we got.

to:

* Tropers/{{Zsuzsa}}: The Quarter Quell and putting Katniss back in the arena for the second book. First, it meant that rather than getting a chance to see the Games and the rest of the Capitol from a new perspective, we instead get basically a repetition of all the major points from the first book. Second, it was the beginning of turning Katniss, who had been a very active and decisive heroine in the first book, into a passive character whose decisions and actions don't matter to the overall plot. Imagine that instead, the Games in the second book happen with Katniss as a mentor. We see another angle to them, and Katniss has to grow up as she needs to learn the skills of a mentor, things that don't come naturally. Meanwhile, she learns about the Rebellion, and ''she'' she decides herself whether or not she wants to get involved and to what extent. It seems like it could have been a much stronger story rather than the "Katniss gets pulled back into the arena and then is dragged into the Rebellion like a rag doll" that we got.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/{{Zsuzsa}}: The Quarter Quell and putting Katniss back in the arena for the second book. First, it meant that rather than getting a chance to see the Games and the rest of the Capitol from a new perspective, we instead get basically a repetition of all the major points from the first book. Second, it was the beginning of turning Katniss, who had been a very active and decisive heroine in the first book, into a passive character whose decisions and actions don't matter to the overall plot. Imagine that instead, the Games in the second book happen with Katniss as a mentor. We see another angle to them, and Katniss has to grow up as she needs to learn the skills of a mentor, things that don't come naturally. Meanwhile, she learns about the Rebellion, and ''she'' decides whether or not she wants to get involved and to what extent. It seems like it could have been a much stronger story rather than the "Katniss gets pulled back into the arena and then is dragged into the Rebellion like a rag doll" that we got.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Starshock: The Hunger Games was great... Until it turns out that the rebels are worse than the Capitol. And how do we know that? [[SarcasmMode Because that fount of good judgement and truth President Snow told Katniss so.]] Sure, he promised Katniss he wouldn't lie to her, but do you really think he ever intended to keep that promise? I personally feel that the Capitol framed the rebels, so that Snow could take Coin down with him. And Coin's just such a great character, so why'd they have to go and ruin her characterization? But my real beef with the ending is that it's such a ShockingSwerve.

to:

* Starshock: The Hunger Games was great... Until it turns out that the rebels are worse than the Capitol. And how do we know that? [[SarcasmMode Because that fount of good judgement and truth President Snow told Katniss so.]] Sure, he promised Katniss he wouldn't lie to her, but do you really think he ever intended to keep that promise? I sure don't, he just made it so he could manipulate Katniss. I personally feel that the Capitol framed the rebels, so that Snow could take Coin down with him. And Coin's just such a great character, so why'd they have to go and ruin her characterization? But my I really liking her characterization as a MagnificentBitch-KnightTemplar-DarkMessiah, but nope, she's just another flat villain, and one with even less characterization as Snow. My real beef with the ending is that it's such a ShockingSwerve.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*Tropers/{{WandaGinnyGreenleaf1500}}: My beef with the epoligue is that [[spoiler:Peeta marries Katniss at all]]. I mean, what? Their entire relationship is summed up by being fake. Katniss pretends to love him because there is a gun pointed at her head that will go off if she doesn't keep up the facade. Not to mention [[spoiler:Peeta is still having fits where he tries to kill her.]] Peeta's entitlement complex towards Katniss did nothing to endear him to me either. And yet, this is portrayed as the best, most romantic and sweet ending. That was the worst point of this entire book.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Starshock: The Hunger Games was great... Until it turns out that the rebels are worse than the Capitol. And how do we know that? [[SarcasmMode Because that fount of good judgement and truth President Snow told Katniss so.]] Sure, he promised Katniss he wouldn't lie to her, but do you really think he ever intended to keep that promise? I personally feel that the Capitol framed the rebels, so that Snow could take Voin down with him. And Coin's just such a great character, so why'd they have to go and ruin her characterization?

to:

* Starshock: The Hunger Games was great... Until it turns out that the rebels are worse than the Capitol. And how do we know that? [[SarcasmMode Because that fount of good judgement and truth President Snow told Katniss so.]] Sure, he promised Katniss he wouldn't lie to her, but do you really think he ever intended to keep that promise? I personally feel that the Capitol framed the rebels, so that Snow could take Voin Coin down with him. And Coin's just such a great character, so why'd they have to go and ruin her characterization?characterization? But my real beef with the ending is that it's such a ShockingSwerve.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Starshock: The Hunger Games was great... Until it turns out that the rebels are worse than the Capitol. And how do we know that? [[SarcasmMode Because that fount of good judgement and truth President Snow told Katniss so.]] Sure, he promised Katniss he wouldn't lie to her, but do you really think he ever intended to keep that promise? I personally feel that the Capitol framed the rebels, so that Snow could take Voin down with him. And Coin's just such a great character, so why'd they have to go and ruin her characterization?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tropers/{{bravo104}}: The fact that Katniss's squad are essentially all killed offscreen; instead of slowly being picked off one by one, which would have made it far more intense and interesting, they are all killed by the Mutts, bar Holmes, Leeg two and Boggs. It really made even having them pointless.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Tropers/{{bravo104}}: The fact that Katniss's squad are essentially all killed offscreen; instead of slowly being picked off one by one, which would have made it far more intense and interesting, they are all killed by the Mutts, bar Holmes, Leeg two and Boggs. It really made even having them pointless.

Added: 318

Changed: 428

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tropers/{{Ikissfrogs}}: The fact that Katniss can't forgive Gale for inadvertently causing [[spoiler: Prim's]] death. It's not even certain that the twin bomb was planted by the rebels, and quite frankly, after all the evil things Katniss herself has done, her condemnation of him seems like the height of hypocrisy.

to:

* Tropers/{{bazer63}}: The epilogue. Why on earth does the epilogue have the author tell us that [[spoiler:Peeta pressures Katniss into having a baby that she doesn't want.]] Worse still, is that this is portrayed as something completely heartwarming. So much for being a feminist idol.
* Tropers/{{Ikissfrogs}}: The fact that Katniss can't forgive Gale for inadvertently causing [[spoiler: Prim's]] death. It's not even certain that the twin bomb was planted by the rebels, and quite frankly, after all the evil things Katniss herself has done, her condemnation of him seems like the height of hypocrisy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Tropers/{{BlueButterfly}}: Similarly disappointed by the above; it felt very poorly portrayed considering the character. [[spoiler: at this point Finnick has everything to lose - a potential future, his wife, and even a child, about whom he may or may not know. And yet he dies so that Katniss can save the day, which she doesn't. It seemed an utterly pointless and undignified end to someone who received so much CharacterDevelopment (supposed TheCasanova turns out to have a one true love) and HiddenDepths (the scene where he explains the objectification and abuse ''and'' utilizes secret-collecting).]]

to:

** Tropers/{{BlueButterfly}}: Similarly disappointed by the above; it felt very poorly portrayed considering the character. [[spoiler: at [[spoiler:At this point Finnick has everything to lose - a potential future, his wife, and even a child, about whom he may or may not know. And yet he dies so that Katniss can save the day, which she doesn't. It seemed an utterly pointless and undignified end to someone who received so much CharacterDevelopment (supposed TheCasanova turns out to have a one true love) and HiddenDepths (the scene where he explains the objectification and abuse ''and'' utilizes secret-collecting).]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Keep in mind:
* Sign your entries
* One moment per book to a troper, if multiple entries are signed to the same troper the more recent one will be cut.
* Moments only, no "just everything he said, " "The entire book" entries.
* No contesting entries. This is subjective, the entry is their opinion.
* No natter. As above, anything contesting an entry will be cut, and anything that's just contributing more can be made its own entry.
* Explain ''why'' it's a Dethroning Moment Of Suck.
* No Real Life examples including ExecutiveMeddling and FanDumb. That is just asking for trouble.
* No ALLCAPS, no '''bold''', and no ''italics'' unless it's the title of a work. We are not yelling the [=DMoSs=] out loud.
----

* Tropers/{{terlwyth}}: Katniss' vow to force the Capitol children into Literature/TheHungerGames for retribution after the Capitol is defeated, claiming it to be [[spoiler: "For Prim"]]. Even after witnessing the horrors of the Games, her earlier nature implied she wouldn't wish the Games on anyone, and when you realize [[spoiler: Prim]] was a caring soul. ''Mockingjay'' was a letdown overall, but this is horrible.
* Tropers/{{TimeTravelerJessica}} - For me its not so much that she voted on it (I can see her doing that to draw Coin out or something) but that the book never bothered to explain what ended up happening with the final Hunger Games - I can't imagine the new government actually forced them to go through with it but it would have been nice to explicitly state that the supposed good guys didn't turn around and force children into the games.
* Tropers/{{WafflePluto}}: This Troper found the death of [[spoiler: Prim]] itself a DMOS. It felt extremely stupid that Katniss [[spoiler: spent three whole books trying to protect Prim]] for that to happen at the end.
* Tropers/{{StormRequiem}}: I was also disappointed by [[spoiler: Finnick]]'s death as well. It was so anticlimatic, especially considering he was an important character in Catching Fire.
** Tropers/{{BlueButterfly}}: Similarly disappointed by the above; it felt very poorly portrayed considering the character. [[spoiler: at this point Finnick has everything to lose - a potential future, his wife, and even a child, about whom he may or may not know. And yet he dies so that Katniss can save the day, which she doesn't. It seemed an utterly pointless and undignified end to someone who received so much CharacterDevelopment (supposed TheCasanova turns out to have a one true love) and HiddenDepths (the scene where he explains the objectification and abuse ''and'' utilizes secret-collecting).]]
* Tropers/{{Ikissfrogs}}: The fact that Katniss can't forgive Gale for inadvertently causing [[spoiler: Prim's]] death. It's not even certain that the twin bomb was planted by the rebels, and quite frankly, after all the evil things Katniss herself has done, her condemnation of him seems like the height of hypocrisy.

Top