Line #13 Administrivia/EverythingsWorseWithSnowclones


1	A "Snowclone" is a form of trope title that relies on imitating an older title's form with only a small modification. Usually this modification amounts to replacing a word or making a pun.
2
3	For example, [[ThisTropeNameReferencesItself this very page is a snowclone]] of the "Everything's better with X" series of tropes. This, of course, is an instance of HypocriticalHumor.
4
5	If your trope title completely relies on the idea that "surely, ''everyone'' read that other page- I just have to make a pun with it", you should [[Administrivia/ClearConciseWitty scrap it in favor of something clearer]]. Always assume that yours will be the first page on the Wiki that someone reads. Given that obscure cultural references are frowned upon, obscure in-jokes originating from the wiki are probably not that much of a good idea either. Here are some examples of it not working:
6
7	* {{Shipping}} → GoingDownWithTheShip \
8	\
9	In this case, the latter example was eventually completely renamed to DyingDeclarationOfLove. It was an easy pun on the whole {{Shipping}} terminology, but it is very easy to confuse for the thing where an ''actual'' captain goes down with an ''actual'' ship. (And in fact, that is exactly what you'll find at GoingDownWithTheShip, now.)
10
11	* EverythingsWorseWithBears → [[HypocriticalHumour Everything's Worse With Snowclones]]\
12	\
13	The "Everything's X with Y" tropes are about shoehorning things into a work to get a certain emotional response, so "Everything's Worse With Snowclones" seems to be about using snowclones to evoke fear or apprehension. It isn't. Thankfully, this is just one administrivia page, so make sure not to repeat our mistake. The former example was renamed to BearsAreBadNews.
14
15	!! Commonly Problematic Snowclones
16
17	As you may have noticed, we have some titles that people very ''frequently'' try to make snowclones of, almost enough for the practice to become a DiscreditedTrope in and of itself. Be careful with these!
18
19	* [[WhatdoYouMeanItsNotAnIndex What Do You Mean, It's Not An X?]]: This family of tropes is about when something is played up as X, but is not really X. The "not really X" part, unfortunately, expanded in scope to include various sub-concepts and now it's impossible to tell which one of them the snowclone is referencing (are the writers aware of the discrepancy? If they are, are they [[PlayedForLaughs playing the contrast for laughs]] or actually trying to get the audience to go "whoa, awesome"?).
20
21	* [[ChekhovsGun Chekhov's X]]: This family includes tropes about elements that are introduced early to become important later. If what you're suggesting is this sort of trope, clearly explain what differentiates it from a generic ChekhovsGun and make sure that it actually needs its own trope. If the difference comes down to "[[Administrivia/TheSameButMoreSpecific Chekhov's Hat]]- a [[ChekhovsGun Chekhov's Gun]] that happens to be a hat", for instance, then it probably doesn't.
22
23	* [[EverythingsBetterWithIndexes Everything's Better With X]]: This family is about things that are '''gratuitously''' inserted into works because their mere existence makes it more awesome; it's '''not''' just for works with X in them, that's Administrivia/NotATrope.
24
25	* [[WhatMeasureIsAnIndex What Measure Is an X]]: This family of tropes is about characters of type X giving off a "this is a nobody and you should not care about them" vibe to some degree, as portrayed in the work or as perceived by the fans. Usually this has to do with them not living up to some standard that plays to a form of WishFulfillment. It's suffered a lot of Administrivia/TropeDecay, so don't just slap something random or grammatically inappropriate instead of the X there just because it sounds vaguely related to your idea of the trope.
26
27	* [[ScrewThisIndexIHaveTropes Screw X I have Y]]: This is pretty much ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin, and as such it works very well (e.g. ScrewTheRulesIHaveMoney). The problem starts when the X and the Y mutate into metaphors and it's not entirely clear anymore what is being screwed, for what reason, in what sense does the person doing the screwing "have" the Y and what part the Y plays in the screwing of the X. Usually at that point it becomes clear that the trope is being shoehorned into a snowclone and you should start looking for a better title.
28
29	* [[UsefulNotes/SchrodingersCat Schrödinger's X]]: Based on the famous thought experiment, these are about cases where one choice can ''retroactively'' change whether something was true or false all along, so until then, it is both true and false at the same time. These can only happen in interactive fiction (or in passive media, if it is based on the writer's choices caused by audience reaction). DO NOT use it for "until something happens, it might turn out either ways". That's just plain, old, obviously logical uncertainity.
30
31	* [[Administrivia/TropeNamerSyndrome X Effect]]: When it's not about status, sound or special effects, it is often hard to search for the trope when X is a work or a character. It can also be that there are many traits that the X has which do not fit the trope. Several formerly X Effect tropes have already been Administrivia/{{renamed\|Tropes}}.
32
33	* [[{{Badass}} Badass X]]: This trope was originally defined as a character who embodied the RuleOfCool and was followed by dozens of tropes about a character, action or object being seen as badass in some way. The problem is that "badass" is actually a very vague term that can mean a wide variety of things including "cool", "manly", "fighter", "(super)powerful", "brave", "assertive", or "fearsome", which are all either covered by other tropes or [[Administrivia/NotATrope not really tropeable to begin with]]. The trope eventually got an Administrivia/ExampleSectionectomy and many of its subtropes were [[Administrivia/RenamedTropes renamed]].
34
35	!!Snowclones that work
36
37	Despite all common sense, there are some naming patterns that just work. We're not sure why. We're not sure how, but experience in the TRS and in the wild on the wiki just proves that against all common sense, they're better than the alternative.
38
39	* [[OurMonstersAreDifferent Our X Are Different]]: This family of tropes focuses on how certain fantasy creatures are portrayed '''differently''' by each work that uses them; it is '''not''' a place to simply list works that include creature X. For that reason, not using the snowclone seems to cause trope decay and Administrivia/{{Zero Context Example}}s when we've studied the tropes. Despite being a snowclone, the tropes work better with the naming pattern than without it. This is not true for variations on the pattern that don't use the word "different".
40	* [[GoodScarsEvilScars Good X, Evil X]]: This trope is about showing good and evil variations of tropes. The snowclones tend to be clear about the trope (due to the aptness), and misuse tends to be prevented.
41

Context Administrivia / EverythingsWorseWithSnowclones