Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Requires Word Of God confirmation
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* AuthorsSavingThrow: In response of players criticism, the ''Balance of Power'' expansion was released 6 months after the vanilla game. It brings back a single-player campaign mode ala its predecessors.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: On release, most of the fanbase found the lack of campaing mode disturbing.
to:
* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: On release, most of the fanbase found the lack of campaing campaign mode disturbing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Griefer is a trope about characters within a story who behave badly in a game. It is not a YMMV trope, nor is it about actual players of an actual game.
Deleted line(s) 6 (click to see context) :
* {{Griefer}}: Hacking and cheats were generally not a problem since not having the same game version as other players tended to make things unstable. However it was not uncommon for someone to enter a "No TIE Advanced No Beams" multiplayer match and switch their craft and loadout at the last second since it wasn't possible to actually lock out certain fighters and weapon loads. Team killing could also be a problem, since there was no option for disabling friendly fire.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 6 (click to see context) :
* AuthorsSavingThrow: In response of players criticism, the ''Balance of Power'' expansion was released 6 months after the vanilla game. It brings back a single-player campaign mode ala its predecessors.
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: Was addressed in ''Balance of Power'' by bringing in a single-player campaign mode ala its predecessors.
to:
* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: Was addressed in ''Balance On release, most of Power'' by bringing in a single-player campaign the fanbase found the lack of campaing mode ala its predecessors.disturbing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AwesomeMusic: The game utilized a contextual score that utilized Music/JohnWilliams' score depending on the actions of the player.
to:
* AwesomeMusic: SugarWiki/AwesomeMusic: The game utilized a contextual score that utilized Music/JohnWilliams' score depending on the actions of the player.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AwesomeMusic: The game utilized a contextual score that utilized Music/JohnWilliams' score depending on the actions of the player.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* {{Griefing}}: Hacking and cheats were generally not a problem since not having the same game version as other players tended to make things unstable. However it was not uncommon for someone to enter a "No TIE Advanced No Beams" multiplayer match and switch their craft and loadout at the last second since it wasn't possible to actually lock out certain fighters and weapon loads. Team killing could also be a problem, since there was no option for disabling friendly fire.
to:
* {{Griefing}}: {{Griefer}}: Hacking and cheats were generally not a problem since not having the same game version as other players tended to make things unstable. However it was not uncommon for someone to enter a "No TIE Advanced No Beams" multiplayer match and switch their craft and loadout at the last second since it wasn't possible to actually lock out certain fighters and weapon loads. Team killing could also be a problem, since there was no option for disabling friendly fire.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* {{Griefing}}: Hacking and cheats were generally not a problem since not having the same game version as other players tended to make things unstable. However it was not uncommon for someone to enter a "No TIE Advanced No Beams" multiplayer match and switch their craft and loadout at the last second since it wasn't possible to actually lock out certain fighters and weapon loads. Team killing could also be a problem, since there was no option for disabling friendly fire.
to:
* {{Griefing}}: Hacking and cheats were generally not a problem since not having the same game version as other players tended to make things unstable. However it was not uncommon for someone to enter a "No TIE Advanced No Beams" multiplayer match and switch their craft and loadout at the last second since it wasn't possible to actually lock out certain fighters and weapon loads. Team killing could also be a problem, since there was no option for disabling friendly fire.fire.
* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: Was addressed in ''Balance of Power'' by bringing in a single-player campaign mode ala its predecessors.
* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: Was addressed in ''Balance of Power'' by bringing in a single-player campaign mode ala its predecessors.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* GameBreaker: Although to a lesser extent than the TIE Defender was in ''TIE Fighter'', the TIE Avenger definitely had this going for it by being faster and more agile than the A-wing, and as well-armed and durable as the X-wing. The TIE Avenger was pretty much the ''only'' ship in multiplayer that was routinely banned by name.
to:
* GameBreaker: GameBreaker:
** Although to a lesser extent than the TIE Defender was in ''TIE Fighter'', the TIE Avenger definitely had this going for it by being faster and more agile than the A-wing, and as well-armed and durable as the X-wing. The TIE Avenger was pretty much the ''only'' ship in multiplayer that was routinely banned by name.
** Although to a lesser extent than the TIE Defender was in ''TIE Fighter'', the TIE Avenger definitely had this going for it by being faster and more agile than the A-wing, and as well-armed and durable as the X-wing. The TIE Avenger was pretty much the ''only'' ship in multiplayer that was routinely banned by name.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
*GameBreaker: Although to a lesser extent than the TIE Defender was in ''TIE Fighter'', the TIE Avenger definitely had this going for it by being faster and more agile than the A-wing, and as well-armed and durable as the X-wing. The TIE Avenger was pretty much the ''only'' ship in multiplayer that was routinely banned by name.
** The Beam weapons that can be added to Imperial fighters basically act like a separate battery that can be used to supercharge the craft's engines if all of its power was dumped. This was so notoriously abused in multiplayer that "No Beams" was one of the most common conditions imposed in vs. matches.
*{{Griefing}}: Hacking and cheats were generally not a problem since not having the same game version as other players tended to make things unstable. However it was not uncommon for someone to enter a "No TIE Advanced No Beams" multiplayer match and switch their craft and loadout at the last second since it wasn't possible to actually lock out certain fighters and weapon loads. Team killing could also be a problem, since there was no option for disabling friendly fire.
** The Beam weapons that can be added to Imperial fighters basically act like a separate battery that can be used to supercharge the craft's engines if all of its power was dumped. This was so notoriously abused in multiplayer that "No Beams" was one of the most common conditions imposed in vs. matches.
*{{Griefing}}: Hacking and cheats were generally not a problem since not having the same game version as other players tended to make things unstable. However it was not uncommon for someone to enter a "No TIE Advanced No Beams" multiplayer match and switch their craft and loadout at the last second since it wasn't possible to actually lock out certain fighters and weapon loads. Team killing could also be a problem, since there was no option for disabling friendly fire.
