Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Ox and Whitehorse are played by talented actors who have some good chemistry together and might have been able to carry the movie themselves, but they don't get nearly as much screentime as most fans would have liked.
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter:
** Many reviewers criticized the fact the windtalkers the film is named after are relegated to supporting characters, while the lead is played by a white actor.
** Ox and Whitehorse are played by talented actors who have some good chemistry together and might have been able to carry the movie themselves, but they don't get nearly as much screentime as most fans would have liked.
** Many reviewers criticized the fact the windtalkers the film is named after are relegated to supporting characters, while the lead is played by a white actor.
** Ox and Whitehorse are played by talented actors who have some good chemistry together and might have been able to carry the movie themselves, but they don't get nearly as much screentime as most fans would have liked.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Ox and Charlie are played by talented actors who have some good chemistry together and might have been able to carry the movie themselves, but they don't get nearly as much screentime as most fans would have liked.
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Ox and Charlie Whitehorse are played by talented actors who have some good chemistry together and might have been able to carry the movie themselves, but they don't get nearly as much screentime as most fans would have liked.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing Flame Bait
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Ox and Charlie are played by talented actors who have some good chemistry together and might have been able to carry the movie themselves, but they don't get nearly as much screentime as most fans would have liked.
* UnfortunateImplications: [[http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/windtalkers-2002 The movie's critics]] [[http://www.plume-noire.com/movies/reviews/windtalkers.html typically point out that the film focuses primarily on Nicholas Cage, while barely developing the Wind Talkers themselves at all.]]
* UnfortunateImplications: [[http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/windtalkers-2002 The movie's critics]] [[http://www.plume-noire.com/movies/reviews/windtalkers.html typically point out that the film focuses primarily on Nicholas Cage, while barely developing the Wind Talkers themselves at all.]]
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Ox and Charlie are played by talented actors who have some good chemistry together and might have been able to carry the movie themselves, but they don't get nearly as much screentime as most fans would have liked.
* UnfortunateImplications: [[http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/windtalkers-2002 The movie's critics]] [[http://www.plume-noire.com/movies/reviews/windtalkers.html typically point out that the film focuses primarily on Nicholas Cage, while barely developing the Wind Talkers themselves at all.]]liked.
* UnfortunateImplications: [[http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/windtalkers-2002 The movie's critics]] [[http://www.plume-noire.com/movies/reviews/windtalkers.html typically point out that the film focuses primarily on Nicholas Cage, while barely developing the Wind Talkers themselves at all.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: Ox and Charlie are played by talented actors who have some good chemistry together and might have been able to carry the movie themselves, but they don't get nearly as much screentime as most fans would have liked.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* UnfortunateImplications: [[http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/windtalkers-2002 The movie's critics]] [[http://www.plume-noire.com/movies/reviews/windtalkers.html typically point out that the film focuses primarily on Nicholas Cage, while barely developing the Wind Talkers themselves at all.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 2 (click to see context) :
* UnfortunateImplications: Plenty of people have pointed out how this is yet another case of a story about a minority being told through the eyes of a white person.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: When Chick is talking how after the war the [=USA=] and Japan will became allies and friends, not even he believes that joke...
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: When Chick is talking how after the war the [=USA=] and Japan will became allies and friends, not even he believes that joke...joke...
* UnfortunateImplications: Plenty of people have pointed out how this is yet another case of a story about a minority being told through the eyes of a white person.
* UnfortunateImplications: Plenty of people have pointed out how this is yet another case of a story about a minority being told through the eyes of a white person.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HilariousInHindsight: When Chick is talking how after the war the [=USA=] and Japan will became allies and friends, not even he believes that joke...
