Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / TheManchurianCandidate

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
YMMV cannot be played with


* NarrowedItDownToTheGuyIRecognize: [[spoiler: Averted with Janet Leigh who was a big star at the time and Angela Lansbury was basically unknown so TheReveal is quite startling.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Creator/AngelaLansbury's performance in the original. LadyMacbeth is less evil. Creator/MerylStreep made chilling work with the character too.

to:

** Creator/AngelaLansbury's performance in the original. LadyMacbeth is less evil. Creator/MerylStreep made chilling work with the character too. Ironically, the movies both ''[[IncestSubtext toned down]]'' one of the most disturbing elements of her literary incarnation, namely the VillainousIncest she commits [[ParentalIncest against her son]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the 1962 movie, the {{yellowface}} on Chunjin, and especially on archetypal YellowPeril villain Yen Lo, would be much less likely to fly today.

to:

** In the 1962 movie, the {{yellowface}} on Chunjin, and especially on archetypal YellowPeril villain Dr. Yen Lo, would be much less likely to fly today.today. At one point Ben Marco even compares Yen Lo to Literature/FuManchu.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesDissonance: In the 1962 movie, the {{yellowface}} on Chunjin, and especially on archetypal YellowPeril villain Yen Lo, would be much less likely to fly today.
* ValuesResonance: Though ''The Manchurian Candidate'' [[https://www.umdjanus.com/single-post/2019/05/05/the-manchurian-candidate-politics-of-gender-and-sexuality-in-1960s-cold-war-cinema has]] [[https://blogs.longwood.edu/politicsandfilm/issues-based__trashed/the-manchurian-candidate/ been]] [[https://swampflix.com/2021/01/29/the-manchurian-candidate-1962/ accused]] of demonizing "masculinized" women and "feminized" men as a threat to the country, the story also notably averts DoubleStandardRapeFemaleOnMale by acknowledging that women can be sexually predatory (even if [[ParentalIncest Mrs. Iselin's rape of her son]] is toned down to IncestSubtext in the [[TheFilmOfTheBook cinematic adaptations]]).

to:

* ValuesDissonance: ValuesDissonance:
**
In the 1962 movie, the {{yellowface}} on Chunjin, and especially on archetypal YellowPeril villain Yen Lo, would be much less likely to fly today.
* ValuesResonance: Though ''The Manchurian Candidate'' ** The story [[https://www.umdjanus.com/single-post/2019/05/05/the-manchurian-candidate-politics-of-gender-and-sexuality-in-1960s-cold-war-cinema has]] [[https://blogs.longwood.edu/politicsandfilm/issues-based__trashed/the-manchurian-candidate/ been]] also]] [[https://swampflix.com/2021/01/29/the-manchurian-candidate-1962/ accused]] been]] accused of demonizing "masculinized" women and "feminized" men as a threat to the country, country.
* ValuesResonance: Despite the aforementioned charges of sexism,
the story also notably averts DoubleStandardRapeFemaleOnMale by acknowledging that women can be sexually predatory (even if [[ParentalIncest Mrs. Iselin's rape of her son]] is toned down to IncestSubtext in the [[TheFilmOfTheBook cinematic adaptations]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ValuesDissonance: In the 1962 movie, the {{yellowface}} on Chunjin, and especially on archetypal YellowPeril villain Yen Lo, would be much less likely to fly today.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ValuesResonance: Though ''The Manchurian Candidate'' [[https://www.umdjanus.com/single-post/2019/05/05/the-manchurian-candidate-politics-of-gender-and-sexuality-in-1960s-cold-war-cinema has]] [[https://blogs.longwood.edu/politicsandfilm/issues-based__trashed/the-manchurian-candidate/ been]] [[https://swampflix.com/2021/01/29/the-manchurian-candidate-1962/ accused]] of demonizing "masculinized" women and "feminized" men as a threat to the country, the story also notably averts DoubleStandardRapeFemaleOnMale by acknowledging that women can be sexually predatory (even if [[ParentalIncest Mrs. Iselin's rape of her son]] is toned down to IncestSubtext in the [[TheFilmOfTheBook cinematic adaptations]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Contrary to popular belief, the titular Manchurian Candidate ''isn't'' the guy who gets brainwashed to perform an assassination[[note]]except in the case of the 2004 version[[/note]], but rather a political candidate whose career will be assisted by the assassination. Nowadays, most people will refer to a "Manchurian candidate" as being someone who does anything that is asked of them, or as a catch-all term for ManchurianAgents in general.

to:

** Contrary to popular belief, the titular Manchurian Candidate ''isn't'' the guy who gets brainwashed to perform an assassination[[note]]except in the case of the 2004 version[[/note]], but rather a political candidate whose career will be assisted by the assassination. Nowadays, most people will refer to a "Manchurian candidate" as being someone who does anything that is asked of them, or as a catch-all term for ManchurianAgents {{Manchurian Agent}}s in general.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Contrary to popular belief, the titular Manchurian Candidate ''isn't'' the guy who gets brainwashed to perform an assassination[[note]]except in the case of the 2004 version[[/note]], but rather a political candidate whose career will be assisted by the assassination. Nowadays, most people will refer to a "Manchurian candidate" as being someone who does anything that is asked of them.

to:

** Contrary to popular belief, the titular Manchurian Candidate ''isn't'' the guy who gets brainwashed to perform an assassination[[note]]except in the case of the 2004 version[[/note]], but rather a political candidate whose career will be assisted by the assassination. Nowadays, most people will refer to a "Manchurian candidate" as being someone who does anything that is asked of them.them, or as a catch-all term for ManchurianAgents in general.


* PoliticallyIncorrectVillain: Mrs. John Iselin, big time. However, at least in the 1962 film, much of this is revealed to be a carefully constructed facade. For example, during her visit to Raymond's office, she is seen arrogantly bossing Chunjin around like a typical Karen, callously not even pretending to get his name right ("Chu Chin Chow - or whatever your name is - the steaks are to be broiled for exactly 11 minutes on each side, in a preheated grill, at 400 degrees"). However, in her final monologue to Raymond, she pronounces his name perfectly and makes it clear that they coordinated with each other closely on the assassination plot ("Chunjin will give you a two-piece sniper's rifle that fits nicely into a special bag").

to:

* PoliticallyIncorrectVillain: Mrs. John Iselin, big time. However, at least in the 1962 film, much of this is revealed to be a carefully constructed facade. For example, during her visit to Raymond's office, she is seen arrogantly bossing Chunjin around like a typical Karen, callously not even pretending to get his name right ("Chu Chin Chow - or whatever your name is - the steaks are to be broiled for exactly 11 minutes on each side, in a preheated grill, at 400 degrees").degrees. No more, no less."). However, in her final monologue to Raymond, she pronounces his name perfectly and makes it clear that they coordinated with each other closely on the assassination plot ("Chunjin will give you a two-piece sniper's rifle that fits nicely into a special bag").
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TearJerker: Despite the saccharine montage earlier, watching as Raymond breaks down after the murder of Jocelyn and her father is heart wrenching. For the first time, Raymond has finally found a way to be happy. Then his mother ends it for him in the most horrific way imaginable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring assassination of UsefulNotes/JohnFKennedy. This rumor appears to combine several facts: MGM/UA ''did'' block the movie from television screenings for a brief time out of respect for the late President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] Sinatra writing to ABC to complain about a television screening of his 1954 movie ''Film/{{Suddenly}}'', also about an assassination attempt, soon after Kennedy's death,[[note]]''Suddenly'' is subject to a similar rumor that Sinatra tried to suppress the film after Kennedy's assassination. In reality, that movie simply entered the public domain after 1982 and fell into obscurity; Sinatra hardly needed to have suppressed a film few people remembered.[[/note]] and Sinatra obtained the rights in 1972, apparently to recoup money lost to the studio during a salary dispute. Sinatra, his daughters Nancy and Tina, and others denied that there was any attempt to "suppress" the movie, and Sinatra even claimed that he wasn't ''aware'' that he owned the rights to ''Candidate'', implying that the deal was his agent's doing. Further, ''Candidate'' received several television screenings during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie received a theatrical re-release, and afterward became widely available to the public.

to:

** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring assassination of UsefulNotes/JohnFKennedy. This rumor appears to combine several facts: MGM/UA Creator/UnitedArtists ''did'' block the movie from television screenings for a brief time out of respect for the late President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] Sinatra writing to ABC to complain about a television screening of his 1954 movie ''Film/{{Suddenly}}'', also about an assassination attempt, soon after Kennedy's death,[[note]]''Suddenly'' is subject to a similar rumor that Sinatra tried to suppress the film after Kennedy's assassination. In reality, that movie simply entered the public domain after 1982 and fell into obscurity; Sinatra hardly needed to have suppressed a film few people remembered.[[/note]] and Sinatra obtained the rights in 1972, apparently to recoup money lost to the studio during a salary dispute. Sinatra, his daughters Nancy and Tina, and others denied that there was any attempt to "suppress" the movie, and Sinatra even claimed that he wasn't ''aware'' that he owned the rights to ''Candidate'', implying that the deal was his agent's doing. Further, ''Candidate'' received several television screenings during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie received a theatrical re-release, and afterward became widely available to the public.

Added: 1584

Changed: 1587

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: In the 1962 film, Rosie (the LoveInterest) meets Marco on the train and they have a [[BigLippedAlligatorMoment singularly bizarre conversation]]. (See an in-depth analysis of this scene, with a transcript of the crazy conversation, [[https://web.archive.org/web/20200203170522/http://letsnottalkaboutmovies.blogspot.com/2008/08/dont-make-scene-manchurian-candidate.html here]].) Later she bails him out of jail and through a shorter but just as weird conversation we learn that she's left her fiancee for him despite only meeting him once. Then she has no impact on the rest of the movie at all other than to [[MsFanservice fill out some dresses]] very nicely. The very odd nature of Rosie and Marco's meeting and the general uselessness of her character have led some (including Creator/RogerEbert; see his review [[http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20031207/REVIEWS08/40802006/1023 here]]) to theorize that she's a DeepCoverAgent sent by the Chinese to keep an eye on Marco--although this raises the question of why Rosie did nothing to stop Marco as he unraveled the conspiracy around Raymond. Others guess that she's actually an American agent investigating the conspiracy, as [[spoiler: Jonathan Demme did with the character in the 2004 remake.]] In the novel, Rosie's ex-fiancee (the one she returns a ring to so she can be with Marco) happens to work as a government agent, and he's the one who helps Marco investigate Raymond (the army, primarily Col. Milt, are the ones who fulfill this function in the 1962 film).

to:

* AdaptationDisplacement: Most people are more familiar with the movies than with their source material.
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: In the 1962 film, Rosie (the LoveInterest) meets Marco on the train and they have a [[BigLippedAlligatorMoment singularly bizarre conversation]]. (See an in-depth analysis of this scene, with a transcript of the crazy conversation, [[https://web.archive.org/web/20200203170522/http://letsnottalkaboutmovies.blogspot.com/2008/08/dont-make-scene-manchurian-candidate.html here]].) Later she bails him out of jail and through a shorter but just as weird conversation we learn that she's left her fiancee for him despite only meeting him once. Then she has no impact on the rest of the movie at all other than to [[MsFanservice fill out some dresses]] very nicely. The very odd nature of Rosie and Marco's meeting and the general uselessness of her character have has led some (including Creator/RogerEbert; see his review [[http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20031207/REVIEWS08/40802006/1023 here]]) to theorize that she's a DeepCoverAgent sent by the Chinese to keep an eye on Marco--although this raises the question of why Rosie did nothing to stop Marco as he unraveled the conspiracy around Raymond. Others guess that she's actually an American agent investigating the conspiracy, as [[spoiler: Jonathan Demme did with the character in the 2004 remake.]] In the novel, Rosie's ex-fiancee (the one she returns a ring to so she can be with Marco) happens to work as a government agent, and he's the one who helps Marco investigate Raymond (the army, primarily Col. Milt, are the ones who fulfill this function in the 1962 film).



** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring the assassination of John F. Kennedy. This rumor appears to combine several facts: MGM/UA ''did'' block the movie from television screenings for a brief time out of respect for the late President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] Sinatra writing to ABC to complain about a television screening of his 1954 movie ''Film/{{Suddenly}}'', also about an assassination attempt, soon after Kennedy's death,[[note]]''Suddenly'' is subject to a similar rumor that Sinatra tried to suppress the film after Kennedy's assassination. In reality, that movie simply entered public domain after 1970 and fell into obscurity; Sinatra hardly needed to have suppressed a film few people remembered.[[/note]] and Sinatra obtained the rights in 1972, apparently to recoup money lost to the studio during a salary dispute. Sinatra, his daughters Nancy and Tina and others denied that there was any attempt to "suppress" the movie, and Sinatra even claimed that he wasn't ''aware'' that he owned the rights to ''Candidate'', implying that the deal was his agent's doing. Further, ''Candidate'' received several television screenings during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie received a theatrical re-release, and afterwards became widely available to the public.

to:

** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring the assassination of John F. Kennedy.UsefulNotes/JohnFKennedy. This rumor appears to combine several facts: MGM/UA ''did'' block the movie from television screenings for a brief time out of respect for the late President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] Sinatra writing to ABC to complain about a television screening of his 1954 movie ''Film/{{Suddenly}}'', also about an assassination attempt, soon after Kennedy's death,[[note]]''Suddenly'' is subject to a similar rumor that Sinatra tried to suppress the film after Kennedy's assassination. In reality, that movie simply entered the public domain after 1970 1982 and fell into obscurity; Sinatra hardly needed to have suppressed a film few people remembered.[[/note]] and Sinatra obtained the rights in 1972, apparently to recoup money lost to the studio during a salary dispute. Sinatra, his daughters Nancy and Tina Tina, and others denied that there was any attempt to "suppress" the movie, and Sinatra even claimed that he wasn't ''aware'' that he owned the rights to ''Candidate'', implying that the deal was his agent's doing. Further, ''Candidate'' received several television screenings during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie received a theatrical re-release, and afterwards afterward became widely available to the public.



** The original film has the flashbacks to Raymond and Jocie's prior relationship. The subplot itself is tragic and heartwarming but the montage of Raymond, Jocie, and the Senator laughing so uproariously so throughly saccharine.

to:

** The original film has the flashbacks to Raymond and Jocie's prior relationship. The subplot itself is tragic and heartwarming but the montage of Raymond, Jocie, and the Senator laughing so uproariously so throughly thoroughly saccharine.



* PoliticallyIncorrectVillain: Mrs. John Iselin, big time. However, at least in the 1962 film, much of this is revealed to be a carefully constructed facade. For example, during her visit to Raymond's office, she is seen arrogantly bossing Chunjin around like a typical karen, callously not even pretending to get his name right ("Chu Chin Chow - or whatever your name is - the steaks are to be broiled for exactly 11 minutes on each side, in a preheated grill, at 400 degrees"). However, in her final monologue to Raymond, she pronounces his name perfectly and makes it clear that they coordinated with each other closely on the assassination plot ("Chunjin will give you a two-piece sniper's rifle that fits nicely into a special bag").

to:

* PoliticallyIncorrectVillain: Mrs. John Iselin, big time. However, at least in the 1962 film, much of this is revealed to be a carefully constructed facade. For example, during her visit to Raymond's office, she is seen arrogantly bossing Chunjin around like a typical karen, Karen, callously not even pretending to get his name right ("Chu Chin Chow - or whatever your name is - the steaks are to be broiled for exactly 11 minutes on each side, in a preheated grill, at 400 degrees"). However, in her final monologue to Raymond, she pronounces his name perfectly and makes it clear that they coordinated with each other closely on the assassination plot ("Chunjin will give you a two-piece sniper's rifle that fits nicely into a special bag").

Added DiffLines:

* PoliticallyIncorrectVillain: Mrs. John Iselin, big time. However, at least in the 1962 film, much of this is revealed to be a carefully constructed facade. For example, during her visit to Raymond's office, she is seen arrogantly bossing Chunjin around like a typical karen, callously not even pretending to get his name right ("Chu Chin Chow - or whatever your name is - the steaks are to be broiled for exactly 11 minutes on each side, in a preheated grill, at 400 degrees"). However, in her final monologue to Raymond, she pronounces his name perfectly and makes it clear that they coordinated with each other closely on the assassination plot ("Chunjin will give you a two-piece sniper's rifle that fits nicely into a special bag").
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring the assassination of John F. Kennedy. This rumor appears to combine several facts: MGM/UA ''did'' block the movie from television screenings for a brief time out of respect for the late President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] Sinatra writing to ABC to complain about a television screening of his 1954 movie ''Suddenly'', also about an assassination attempt, soon after Kennedy's death,[[note]]''Suddenly'' is subject to a similar rumor that Sinatra tried to suppress the film after Kennedy's assassination. In reality, that movie simply entered public domain after 1970 and fell into obscurity; Sinatra hardly needed to have suppressed a film few people remembered.[[/note]] and Sinatra obtained the rights in 1972, apparently to recoup money lost to the studio during a salary dispute. Sinatra, his daughters Nancy and Tina and others denied that there was any attempt to "suppress" the movie, and Sinatra even claimed that he wasn't ''aware'' that he owned the rights to ''Candidate'', implying that the deal was his agent's doing. Further, ''Candidate'' received several television screenings during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie received a theatrical re-release, and afterwards became widely available to the public.

to:

** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring the assassination of John F. Kennedy. This rumor appears to combine several facts: MGM/UA ''did'' block the movie from television screenings for a brief time out of respect for the late President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] Sinatra writing to ABC to complain about a television screening of his 1954 movie ''Suddenly'', ''Film/{{Suddenly}}'', also about an assassination attempt, soon after Kennedy's death,[[note]]''Suddenly'' is subject to a similar rumor that Sinatra tried to suppress the film after Kennedy's assassination. In reality, that movie simply entered public domain after 1970 and fell into obscurity; Sinatra hardly needed to have suppressed a film few people remembered.[[/note]] and Sinatra obtained the rights in 1972, apparently to recoup money lost to the studio during a salary dispute. Sinatra, his daughters Nancy and Tina and others denied that there was any attempt to "suppress" the movie, and Sinatra even claimed that he wasn't ''aware'' that he owned the rights to ''Candidate'', implying that the deal was his agent's doing. Further, ''Candidate'' received several television screenings during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie received a theatrical re-release, and afterwards became widely available to the public.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring the assassination of John F. Kennedy. This appears to be a garbled combination of several facts: MGM/UA ''did'' block the movie from television screenings for a brief time after Kennedy's assassination out of respect for the late President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] and Sinatra obtained the rights in 1972, apparently to recoup money lost to the studio during a salary dispute. Sinatra, his daughter Tina and others denied that there was any attempt to "suppress" the movie, and Sinatra even claimed that he wasn't ''aware'' that he owned the rights to ''Candidate'', implying that the deal was his agent's doing. Further, ''Candidate'' received several television screenings during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie received a theatrical re-release, and afterwards became widely available to the public.

to:

** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring the assassination of John F. Kennedy. This rumor appears to be a garbled combination of combine several facts: MGM/UA ''did'' block the movie from television screenings for a brief time after Kennedy's assassination out of respect for the late President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] Sinatra writing to ABC to complain about a television screening of his 1954 movie ''Suddenly'', also about an assassination attempt, soon after Kennedy's death,[[note]]''Suddenly'' is subject to a similar rumor that Sinatra tried to suppress the film after Kennedy's assassination. In reality, that movie simply entered public domain after 1970 and fell into obscurity; Sinatra hardly needed to have suppressed a film few people remembered.[[/note]] and Sinatra obtained the rights in 1972, apparently to recoup money lost to the studio during a salary dispute. Sinatra, his daughter daughters Nancy and Tina and others denied that there was any attempt to "suppress" the movie, and Sinatra even claimed that he wasn't ''aware'' that he owned the rights to ''Candidate'', implying that the deal was his agent's doing. Further, ''Candidate'' received several television screenings during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie received a theatrical re-release, and afterwards became widely available to the public.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring the assassination of John F. Kennedy. This appears to be a garbled combination of several facts: MGM/UA ''did'' block the movie from television screenings for a brief time after Kennedy's assassination out of respect for the late President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] and Sinatra or his agent purchased the rights in 1972, apparently to recoup money lost to the studio during a salary dispute. Sinatra, his daughter Tina and others denied that there was any attempt to "suppress" the movie, and Sinatra even claimed that he wasn't ''aware'' that he owned the rights to the movie, implying that the deal was his agent's doing. [[note]]Indeed, Sinatra often expressed pride in ''Candidate'', and even supported the idea of remaking it when it was first suggested in the mid-'90s.[[/note]] Even so, the movie received several television screenings during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie received a theatrical re-release, and became widely available to the public.

to:

** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring the assassination of John F. Kennedy. This appears to be a garbled combination of several facts: MGM/UA ''did'' block the movie from television screenings for a brief time after Kennedy's assassination out of respect for the late President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] and Sinatra or his agent purchased obtained the rights in 1972, apparently to recoup money lost to the studio during a salary dispute. Sinatra, his daughter Tina and others denied that there was any attempt to "suppress" the movie, and Sinatra even claimed that he wasn't ''aware'' that he owned the rights to the movie, ''Candidate'', implying that the deal was his agent's doing. [[note]]Indeed, Sinatra often expressed pride in ''Candidate'', and even supported the idea of remaking it when it was first suggested in the mid-'90s.[[/note]] Even so, the movie Further, ''Candidate'' received several television screenings during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie received a theatrical re-release, and afterwards became widely available to the public.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring the assassination of John F. Kennedy. This appears to be a garbled combination of several facts: MGM/UA ''did'' block the movie from television screenings for a brief time after Kennedy's assassination out of respect for the late President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] and Sinatra or his agent purchased the rights in 1972, apparently to recoup money lost to the studio during the original salary dispute. Sinatra, his daughter and others involved in the deal denied that there was any attempt to "suppress" the movie, and Sinatra even claimed that he wasn't ''aware'' that he owned the rights to the movie, implying that it was his agent's doing. [[note]]Indeed, Sinatra often expressed pride in ''Candidate'', and even supported the idea of remaking it when it was first suggested in the mid-'90s.[[/note]] Even so, the movie received several television screenings during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie received a theatrical re-release, and became widely available to the public.

to:

** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring the assassination of John F. Kennedy. This appears to be a garbled combination of several facts: MGM/UA ''did'' block the movie from television screenings for a brief time after Kennedy's assassination out of respect for the late President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] and Sinatra or his agent purchased the rights in 1972, apparently to recoup money lost to the studio during the original a salary dispute. Sinatra, his daughter Tina and others involved in the deal denied that there was any attempt to "suppress" the movie, and Sinatra even claimed that he wasn't ''aware'' that he owned the rights to the movie, implying that it the deal was his agent's doing. [[note]]Indeed, Sinatra often expressed pride in ''Candidate'', and even supported the idea of remaking it when it was first suggested in the mid-'90s.[[/note]] Even so, the movie received several television screenings during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie received a theatrical re-release, and became widely available to the public.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
expanding/revising the common knowledge section





** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring the assassination of John F. Kennedy. This appears to be a garbled combination of several tidbits: MGM/UA ''did'' withdraw the movie from television screenings for a brief time after Kennedy's assassination out of respect for the President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] and Sinatra bought the rights to the film in the 1970s, hoping to recoup what he saw as an unfair salary from the studio. But there's no evidence that Sinatra ever suppressed the movie; it's more likely that, since ''Candidate'' [[VindicatedByHistory wasn't universally considered a classic]] at the time, Sinatra and his lawyers didn't think it would be profitable to make it readily available. Even so, the movie received several television screenings and at least one limited theatrical rerelease during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie became widely available.

to:

** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring the assassination of John F. Kennedy. This appears to be a garbled combination of several tidbits: facts: MGM/UA ''did'' withdraw block the movie from television screenings for a brief time after Kennedy's assassination out of respect for the late President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] and Sinatra bought or his agent purchased the rights in 1972, apparently to recoup money lost to the studio during the original salary dispute. Sinatra, his daughter and others involved in the deal denied that there was any attempt to "suppress" the movie, and Sinatra even claimed that he wasn't ''aware'' that he owned the rights to the film in the 1970s, hoping to recoup what he saw as an unfair salary from the studio. But there's no evidence movie, implying that it was his agent's doing. [[note]]Indeed, Sinatra ever suppressed often expressed pride in ''Candidate'', and even supported the movie; it's more likely that, since ''Candidate'' [[VindicatedByHistory wasn't universally considered a classic]] at idea of remaking it when it was first suggested in the time, Sinatra and his lawyers didn't think it would be profitable to make it readily available. mid-'90s.[[/note]] Even so, the movie received several television screenings and at least one limited theatrical rerelease during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie received a theatrical re-release, and became widely available.available to the public.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


* CommonKnowledge:
** Contrary to popular belief, the titular Manchurian Candidate ''isn't'' the guy who gets brainwashed to perform an assassination[[note]]except in the case of the 2004 version[[/note]], but rather a political candidate whose career will be assisted by the assassination. Nowadays, most people will refer to a "Manchurian candidate" as being someone who does anything that is asked of them.
** A longstanding [[PopCultureUrbanLegends urban legend]] claims that Creator/FrankSinatra bought the rights for the movie in order to bury it, feeling guilt over the movie's supposedly inspiring the assassination of John F. Kennedy. This appears to be a garbled combination of several tidbits: MGM/UA ''did'' withdraw the movie from television screenings for a brief time after Kennedy's assassination out of respect for the President,[[note]]It would not air on television until 1965 as a result[[/note]] and Sinatra bought the rights to the film in the 1970s, hoping to recoup what he saw as an unfair salary from the studio. But there's no evidence that Sinatra ever suppressed the movie; it's more likely that, since ''Candidate'' [[VindicatedByHistory wasn't universally considered a classic]] at the time, Sinatra and his lawyers didn't think it would be profitable to make it readily available. Even so, the movie received several television screenings and at least one limited theatrical rerelease during the period it was supposedly "suppressed," though it wasn't until the rights reverted to MGM/UA in 1987 that the movie became widely available.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In the 2004 film, where Marco meets Melvin at the school, he picks up the drawing of the tattooed face with dramatic music in the background.

Top