Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 152 (click to see context) from:
** Many of the jurors have fun designs and quirky personalities, meaning they could easily stand as proper characters of their own, however, most of them don't even get names (besides the ones who appear as witnesses like John Garrideb and Bruce Fairplay) and their participation is often restricted to the Summation Examination and final verdict. The worst example by far is Vilen Borshevik, a Russian revolutionary who is built up as an important figure all the way back in Case 2, but eventually, he does nothing more than being Juror 6 in Case 5. The only ones who seem to avert this are Quinby Altamont and Evie Vigil from the second game.
to:
** Many of the jurors have fun designs and quirky personalities, meaning they could easily stand as proper characters of their own, however, most of them don't even get names (besides the ones who appear as witnesses like John Garrideb and Bruce Fairplay) and their participation is often restricted to the Summation Examination and final verdict. The worst example by far is Vilen Borshevik, a Russian revolutionary who is built up as an important figure all the way back in Case 2, who has set the Crystal Tower (where the events in Case 3 of ''Resolve'' happen) as a target, but eventually, he does nothing more than being Juror 6 in Case 5. The only ones who seem to avert this are Quinby Altamont and Evie Vigil from the second game.
