Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 5 (click to see context) :
%%* UglyCute: [[spoiler: The gargoyle-children after they lose their humanity alongside their mother.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** At least with the stop motion, it's only a couple seconds long.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
adding to the page
Added DiffLines:
* RetroactiveRecognition: Creator/JulianneMoore makes her film debut as Susan in the ''Lot 249'' segment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects]], one could argue the effects are good enough to rival the transformation from ''Film/TheFly1986''. The following bit of her taking off through the roof of Preston's apartment however is achieved with some [[SpecialEffectFailure rough stop motion work]].
to:
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The [[spoiler:The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects]], one could argue the effects are good enough to rival the transformation from ''Film/TheFly1986''. The following bit of her taking off through the roof of Preston's apartment however is achieved with some [[SpecialEffectFailure rough stop motion work]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* SpiritualSuccessor: To ''Film/{{Creepshow}}'' and ''Film/Creepshow2''. Considering on how the television series was initially pitched as a spinoff to ''Creepshow'', it isn't much of a stretch.
** In fact, Tom Savini has gone on record to state that ''this'' is the ''real'' ''Film/Creepshow3'', unlike the InNameOnly one that came out 16 years later.
** In fact, Tom Savini has gone on record to state that ''this'' is the ''real'' ''Film/Creepshow3'', unlike the InNameOnly one that came out 16 years later.
to:
* SpiritualSuccessor: To ''Film/{{Creepshow}}'' and ''Film/Creepshow2''. Considering on how the television series was initially pitched as a spinoff to ''Creepshow'', it isn't much of a stretch.
**stretch. In fact, Tom Savini has gone on record to state that ''this'' is the ''real'' ''Film/Creepshow3'', unlike the InNameOnly one that came out 16 years later.
**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* SpiritualSuccessor: To ''Film/{{Creepshow}}'' and ''Film/{{Creepshow 2}}''. Considering on how the television series was initially pitched as a spinoff to ''Creepshow'', it isn't much of a stretch.
** In fact, Tom Savini has gone on record to state that ''this'' is the ''real'' ''Creepshow 3'', unlike the InNameOnly one that came out 16 years later.
** In fact, Tom Savini has gone on record to state that ''this'' is the ''real'' ''Creepshow 3'', unlike the InNameOnly one that came out 16 years later.
to:
* SpiritualSuccessor: To ''Film/{{Creepshow}}'' and ''Film/{{Creepshow 2}}''.''Film/Creepshow2''. Considering on how the television series was initially pitched as a spinoff to ''Creepshow'', it isn't much of a stretch.
** In fact, Tom Savini has gone on record to state that ''this'' is the ''real''''Creepshow 3'', ''Film/Creepshow3'', unlike the InNameOnly one that came out 16 years later.
** In fact, Tom Savini has gone on record to state that ''this'' is the ''real''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* SpiritualSuccessor: To ''Film/{{Creepshow}}'' and ''Film/{{Creepshow 2}}''. Considering on how the television series was initially pitched as a spinoff to ''Creepshow'', it isn't much of a stretch.
** In fact, Tom Savini has gone on record to state that ''this'' is the ''real'' ''Creepshow 3'', unlike the InNameOnly one that came out 16 years later.
** In fact, Tom Savini has gone on record to state that ''this'' is the ''real'' ''Creepshow 3'', unlike the InNameOnly one that came out 16 years later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Zero Context Examples. Signature Scene is likely misuse, since it lists spoilers and, as explained in the trope page, "you shouldn't generally feel the urge to add more than one for a particular work yourself".
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
* SignatureScene: The most remembered scene in this movie is either [[spoiler:the cat doing an OrificeInvasion by jumping into a guy's mouth]], or [[spoiler:the human transformation into a gargoyle]], depending on which fan you ask.
* UglyCute: [[spoiler: The gargoyle-children after they lose their humanity alongside their mother.]]
* UglyCute: [[spoiler: The gargoyle-children after they lose their humanity alongside their mother.]]
to:
*
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects]], one could argue the effects are good enough to rival the transformation from ''Film/TheFly1986''.
to:
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects]], one could argue the effects are good enough to rival the transformation from ''Film/TheFly1986''. The following bit of her taking off through the roof of Preston's apartment however is achieved with some [[SpecialEffectFailure rough stop motion work]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects]], one could argue the effects are good enough to rival the transformation from Film/TheFly1986.
to:
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects]], one could argue the effects are good enough to rival the transformation from Film/TheFly1986.''Film/TheFly1986''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects.]]
to:
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects.]]effects]], one could argue the effects are good enough to rival the transformation from Film/TheFly1986.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* NightmareFuel: The way poor Mike the bartender screams "''HELP ME!!''" just before the gargoyle decapitates him. Also nightmare fuel in-story, since Preston is still haunted by it in his dreams even years later.
to:
* NightmareFuel: The way poor Mike Jer the bartender screams "''HELP ME!!''" just before the gargoyle decapitates him. Also nightmare fuel in-story, since Preston is still haunted by it in his dreams even years later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects.]]
to:
* SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects.]]]]
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* SignatureScene: The most remembered scene in this movie is either [[spoiler:the cat doing an OrificeInvasion by jumping into a guy's mouth]], or [[spoiler:the human transformation into a gargoyle]], depending on which fan you ask.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects.]]
to:
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: SugarWiki/VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* UglyCute: [[spoiler: The gargoyle-children after they lose their humanity alongside their mother.]]
to:
* UglyCute: [[spoiler: The gargoyle-children after they lose their humanity alongside their mother.]]
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects.]]
* VisualEffectsOfAwesome: [[spoiler: The scene of the wife turning into a gargoyle is probably one of the best transformations ever done with practical effects.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* NightmareFuel: The way poor Mike the bartender screams "HELP ME!!" just before being decapitated. Also nightmare fuel in-story, since Preston is still haunted by it in his dreams even years later.
to:
* NightmareFuel: The way poor Mike the bartender screams "HELP ME!!" "''HELP ME!!''" just before being decapitated.the gargoyle decapitates him. Also nightmare fuel in-story, since Preston is still haunted by it in his dreams even years later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* NightmareFuel: The way poor Mike the bartender screams "HELP ME!!" just before being decapitated. Also nightmare fuel in-story, since Preston is still haunted by it in his dreams even years later.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* UglyCute: [[spoiler: The gargoyle-children after they lose their humanity alongside their mother.]]
