Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / SweptAway

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misuse


* MisaimedMarketing: Probably the main reason why the film was such a massive critical and commercial failure. The advertising tried to play it up as a light-hearted romantic comedy, while completely glossing over the fact that Giuseppe spends most of the second act being downright abusive toward Amber.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: At the end of the film, Amber's husband Tony sabotages her relationship with Giuseppe, essentially forcing her to stay with him. Given that the first half of the film was mostly dedicated to showcasing how incredibly dysfunctional their relationship was, many viewers are inclined to question why he even wants her to stay with him at all, rather than jumping at the opportunity to end things.

to:

* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: At the end of the film, Amber's husband Tony sabotages her relationship with Giuseppe, essentially forcing her to stay with him. Given that the first half of the film was mostly dedicated to showcasing how incredibly dysfunctional their relationship was, many viewers are inclined to question why he even wants her to stay with him at all, rather than jumping at the opportunity to end things.things.

----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: The basic story of the film is actually about 90% the same as the 1974 original. The changes that really hurt the story are the removal of the political subtext, the near-rape scene in the original being turned into an ''actual'' rape scene for this one, and the original version's ending, in which the lead characters make a mutual (if reluctant) decision not to continue their relationship, being turned into far more of an outright DownerEnding where the two are clearly still in love, but Amber's husband proves a SpannerInTheWorks and dupes Giuseppe into thinking she's dumped him.

to:

* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: The basic story of the film is actually about 90% the same as the 1974 original. The changes that really hurt the story are the removal of downplaying the political subtext, the near-rape scene in the original being turned into an ''actual'' rape scene for this one, and the original version's ending, in which the lead characters make a mutual (if reluctant) decision not to continue their relationship, being turned into far more of an outright DownerEnding where the two are clearly still in love, but Amber's husband proves a SpannerInTheWorks and dupes Giuseppe into thinking she's dumped him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: The musical ImagineSpot that abruptly occurs while Amber and Giuseppe are marooned on the island comes out of absolutely nowhere, is completely at odds with the tone that the movie's been going for, and seems to have been inserted for no other reason than the fact that Music/{{Madonna}} likely wanted a musical number.

to:

* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: The musical ImagineSpot that abruptly occurs while Amber and Giuseppe are marooned on the island comes out of absolutely nowhere, is completely at odds with the tone that the movie's been going for, and seems to have been inserted for no other reason than the fact that Music/{{Madonna}} likely wanted a musical number. And even then it doesn't feature Madonna singing, but rather lip-synching to the song in the sequence (Della Reese's version of "Come On-a My House").



* {{Narm}}: The rape scene is robbed of any power it might have thanks to two things. Firstly, the sequence doesn't even attempt to disguise the fact that both parties are still [[RightThroughHisPants wearing their pants throughout the whole thing]], and secondly, Madonna's acting just makes Amber seem whiny and vaguely annoyed during the sequence.

to:

* {{Narm}}: The rape near-rape scene is robbed of any power it might have have, thanks to two things. Firstly, the sequence doesn't even attempt to disguise the fact that both parties are still [[RightThroughHisPants wearing their pants throughout the whole thing]], and secondly, Madonna's acting just makes making Amber seem whiny and vaguely annoyed during the sequence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: The basic story of the film is actually about 90% the same as the 1974 original. The changes that really hurt the story are the removal of the political subtext, the near-rape scene in the original being turned into an ''actual'' rape scene for this one, and the original version's ending, in which the lead characters make a mutual (if reluctant) decision not to continue their relationship, being turned into far more of an outright DownerEnding where the two are clearly still in love, but Amber's husband proves a SpannerInTheWorks and dupes Giuseppe into thinking she's dumped him.

to:

* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: The basic story of the film is actually about 90% the same as the 1974 original. The changes that really hurt the story are the removal of the political subtext, the near-rape scene in the original being turned into an ''actual'' rape scene for this one, and the original version's ending, in which the lead characters make a mutual (if reluctant) decision not to continue their relationship, being turned into far more of an outright DownerEnding where the two are clearly still in love, but Amber's husband proves a SpannerInTheWorks and dupes Giuseppe into thinking she's dumped him.him.
* WhyWouldAnyoneTakeHimBack: At the end of the film, Amber's husband Tony sabotages her relationship with Giuseppe, essentially forcing her to stay with him. Given that the first half of the film was mostly dedicated to showcasing how incredibly dysfunctional their relationship was, many viewers are inclined to question why he even wants her to stay with him at all, rather than jumping at the opportunity to end things.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: The musical ImagineSpot that abruptly occurs while Amber and Giuseppe are marooned on the island comes out of absolutely nowhere, is completely at odds with the tone that the movie's been going for, and seems to have been inserted for no other reason than the fact that Music/{{Madonna}} likely wanted a musical number.
* MisaimedMarketing: Probably the main reason why the film was such a massive critical and commercial failure. The advertising tried to play it up as a light-hearted romantic comedy, while completely glossing over the fact that Giuseppe spends most of the second act being downright abusive toward Amber.


Added DiffLines:

* RetroactiveRecognition: Creator/ElizabethBanks has a minor role in the movie's first act, as Amber's DumbBlonde friend.

Added: 613

Changed: 72

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Narm}}: The rape scene is robbed of any power it might have thanks to two things. Firstly, the sequence doesn't even attempt to disguise the fact that both parties are still [[RightThroughHisPants wearing their pants throughout the whole thing]], and secondly the victim is being played by Madonna, whose legendary acting un-ability just makes her seem whiny and slightly annoyed during the sequence.
* TearJerker: As bad as the movie is, the ending is arguably this, thanks to manipulations leaving both people thinking that the other no longer loves them.

to:

* {{Narm}}: The rape scene is robbed of any power it might have thanks to two things. Firstly, the sequence doesn't even attempt to disguise the fact that both parties are still [[RightThroughHisPants wearing their pants throughout the whole thing]], and secondly the victim is being played by Madonna, whose legendary secondly, Madonna's acting un-ability just makes her Amber seem whiny and slightly vaguely annoyed during the sequence.
* TearJerker: As bad as the movie is, the ending is arguably this, thanks to manipulations leaving both people thinking that the other no longer loves them.them.
* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: The basic story of the film is actually about 90% the same as the 1974 original. The changes that really hurt the story are the removal of the political subtext, the near-rape scene in the original being turned into an ''actual'' rape scene for this one, and the original version's ending, in which the lead characters make a mutual (if reluctant) decision not to continue their relationship, being turned into far more of an outright DownerEnding where the two are clearly still in love, but Amber's husband proves a SpannerInTheWorks and dupes Giuseppe into thinking she's dumped him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Tearjerker}}: As bad as the movie is, the ending is arguably this, thanks to manipulations leaving both people thinking that the other no longer loves them.

to:

* {{Tearjerker}}: TearJerker: As bad as the movie is, the ending is arguably this, thanks to manipulations leaving both people thinking that the other no longer loves them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Narm}}: The rape scene is robbed of any power it might have thanks to two things. Firstly, the sequence doesn't even attempt to disguise the fact that both parties are still [[RightThroughHisPants wearing their pants throughout the whole thing]], and secondly the victim is being played by Madonna, whose legendary acting un-ability just makes her seem whiny and slightly annoyed during the sequence.

to:

* {{Narm}}: The rape scene is robbed of any power it might have thanks to two things. Firstly, the sequence doesn't even attempt to disguise the fact that both parties are still [[RightThroughHisPants wearing their pants throughout the whole thing]], and secondly the victim is being played by Madonna, whose legendary acting un-ability just makes her seem whiny and slightly annoyed during the sequence.sequence.
* {{Tearjerker}}: As bad as the movie is, the ending is arguably this, thanks to manipulations leaving both people thinking that the other no longer loves them.

Changed: 448

Removed: 379

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CoupleBomb: Sort of. It starred Music/{{Madonna}} and was directed by her then-husband Creator/GuyRitchie, and was almost universally panned as being terrible, and led to Madonna's declaration that she would never act again.
* {{Narm}}: The rape scene is robbed of any power it might have thanks to two things. Firstly, the sequence doesn't even attempt to disguise the fact that both parties are still wearing their pants throughout the whole thing, and secondly the victim is being played by Madonna, whose legendary acting un-ability just makes her seem whiny and slightly annoyed during the sequence.

to:

* CoupleBomb: Sort of. It starred Music/{{Madonna}} and was directed by her then-husband Creator/GuyRitchie, and was almost universally panned as being terrible, and led to Madonna's declaration that she would never act again.
* {{Narm}}: The rape scene is robbed of any power it might have thanks to two things. Firstly, the sequence doesn't even attempt to disguise the fact that both parties are still [[RightThroughHisPants wearing their pants throughout the whole thing, thing]], and secondly the victim is being played by Madonna, whose legendary acting un-ability just makes her seem whiny and slightly annoyed during the sequence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AdaptationDisplacement: The movie is only remembered for being terrible, but the original 1974 Italian film in which it was based is only remembered for being remade into a terrible movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CoupleBomb: Sort of. It starred Music/{{Madonna}} and was directed by her then-husband Creator/GuyRitchie, and was almost universally panned as being terrible, and led to Madonna's declaration that she would never act again.

to:

* CoupleBomb: Sort of. It starred Music/{{Madonna}} and was directed by her then-husband Creator/GuyRitchie, and was almost universally panned as being terrible, and led to Madonna's declaration that she would never act again.again.
* {{Narm}}: The rape scene is robbed of any power it might have thanks to two things. Firstly, the sequence doesn't even attempt to disguise the fact that both parties are still wearing their pants throughout the whole thing, and secondly the victim is being played by Madonna, whose legendary acting un-ability just makes her seem whiny and slightly annoyed during the sequence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CoupleBomb: Sort of. It starred Music/{{Madonna}} and was directed by her then-husband Creator/GuyRitchie, and was almost universally panned as being terrible, and led to Madonna's declaration that she would never act again.

Top