Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / ScienceCourt

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* HarsherInHindsight: In an age where scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers") and laws, fake news and high-profile influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels downright utopian.

to:

* HarsherInHindsight: In an age where scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, conspiracy theories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers") and laws, fake news and high-profile influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels downright utopian.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesResonance: Our primary hero is a dark-skinned female lawyer. While not wholly unusual there (detective and court shows had been showing diverse casts for a while even at that point), it is notable for also being a dark-skinned female ''science-based'' lawyer given there's still a huge push for more women to enter STEM programs to counteract primarily male-dominated fields.

to:

* ValuesResonance: Our primary hero is a dark-skinned female lawyer. While not wholly unusual there (detective and court shows had been showing diverse casts for a while even at that point), it Allison Krempel is notable for also being a dark-skinned female ''science-based'' lawyer given there's still a huge push for more women to enter STEM programs to counteract primarily male-dominated fields.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ValuesResonance: Our primary hero is a dark-skinned female lawyer. While not wholly unusual there (detective and court shows had been showing diverse casts for a while even at that point), it is notable for also being a dark-skinned female ''science-based'' lawyer given there's still a huge push for more women to enter STEM programs to counteract primarily male-dominated fields.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the beginning of “Magnets” Doug goes into Sparky’s shop looking for a birthday gift for Judge Stone, whom he refers to as his ‘judge friend.’ At the end of the episode he gives her the gift after the trial, to which she is surprised he knew her birthday since she never told anyone.

to:

** In the beginning of “Magnets” Doug goes into Sparky’s shop looking for a birthday gift for Judge Stone, whom he refers to as his ‘judge friend.’ At the end of the episode episode's trial he gives her the gift after the trial, gift, to which she is surprised he knew her birthday since because she never told anyone. anyone her birthday.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* At the end of "Inertia" Cramwood apologizes to Jenkins for bullying him in school, and offers him a role in his next movie. When Jenkins declines the role, Cramwood offers to take him out for a burger instead, which Jenkins gladly accepts. Ms. Krempel is actually moved to tears by it.
* In the beginning of “Magnets” Doug goes into Sparky’s shop looking for a birthday gift for Judge Stone, whom he refers to as his ‘judge friend.’ At the end of the episode he gives her the gift after the trial, to which she is surprised he knew her birthday since she never told anyone.

to:

* ** At the end of "Inertia" Cramwood apologizes to Jenkins for bullying him in school, and offers him a role in his next movie. When Jenkins declines the role, Cramwood offers to take him out for a burger instead, which Jenkins gladly accepts. Ms. Krempel is actually moved to tears by it.
* ** In the beginning of “Magnets” Doug goes into Sparky’s shop looking for a birthday gift for Judge Stone, whom he refers to as his ‘judge friend.’ At the end of the episode he gives her the gift after the trial, to which she is surprised he knew her birthday since she never told anyone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the beginning of “Magnets” Doug goes into Sparky’s shop looking for a birthday gift for Judge Stone, whom he refers to as his ‘judge friend.’ At the end of the episode he gives her the gift after the trial, to which she is surprised he knew her birthday since she never told anyone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* At the end of "Inertia" Cramwood apologizes to Jenkins for bullying him in school, and offers him a role in his next movie. When Jenkins declines the role, Cramwood offers to take him out for a burger instead, which Jenkins gladly accepts. Ms. Krempel is actually moved to tears by it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Per Hindsight Cleanup Thread, removing on the grounds that the entry is 'just "the name Wedgewood exists".'


* FunnyAneurysmMoment: A season one episode prominently featured a dog called "Wedgewood". Said episode was re-aired in the new format for season 2. The season 2 version aired roughly around the same time that a shooting occurred at "Wedgewood Baptist Church".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Meta example: when Tim's voice actor hit puberty, the staff decided that they weren't going to replace him and instead had the character hit puberty as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: On occasion, Stenographer Fred will be sitting outside and be discussing something that's somewhat relevant... but it'll never be mentioned again. During the "Squigglevision" cartoons, these scenes were pretty much always cut out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers") and laws, fake news and high-profile influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels downright utopian.

to:

* HarsherInhindsight: HarsherInHindsight: In an age where scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers") and laws, fake news and high-profile influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels downright utopian.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers") and laws, fake news and high-profile influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint way to teach kids science and more like a utopia.

to:

* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers") and laws, fake news and high-profile influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint way to teach kids science and more like a utopia.downright utopian.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers"), fake news and high-profile influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint way to teach kids science and more like a utopia.

to:

* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers"), earthers") and laws, fake news and high-profile influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint way to teach kids science and more like a utopia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where high-profile scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers"), fake news and high-profile influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint way to teach kids science and more like a utopia.

to:

* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where high-profile scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers"), fake news and high-profile influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint way to teach kids science and more like a utopia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where high-profile scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers"), fake news and high-profile influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint wait to teach kids science and more like a utopia.

to:

* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where high-profile scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers"), fake news and high-profile influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint wait way to teach kids science and more like a utopia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where high-profile scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers"), fake news and high-profile influencers influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint wait to teach kids science and more like a utopia.

to:

* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where high-profile scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers"), fake news and high-profile influencers influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint wait to teach kids science and more like a utopia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where high-profile scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers"), fake news and high-profile influencers influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint wait to teach kids science and more like a utopia.

to:

* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where high-profile scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk ConspiracyTheories, UsefulNotes/ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers"), fake news and high-profile influencers influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint wait to teach kids science and more like a utopia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where high-profile scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk high-profile {{conspiracy theori|es}}sts, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers"), fake news and their influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint wait to teach kids science and more like a utopia.

to:

* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where high-profile scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk high-profile {{conspiracy theori|es}}sts, ConspiracyTheories, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers"), fake news and their high-profile influencers influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint wait to teach kids science and more like a utopia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HarsherInhindsight: In an age where high-profile scientists are regularly fighting tooth and claw to debunk high-profile {{conspiracy theori|es}}sts, anti-science groups (such as "flat earthers"), fake news and their influencers, the idea of a court where scientific fact is the bottom line and can never be argued feels less like a quaint wait to teach kids science and more like a utopia.

Added: 359

Removed: 358

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CrowningMomentOfHeartwarming: In "Electric Current", Ms Krempel scolds Tim for stepping in before he had all the facts behind his case, and immediately regrets her remarks. She calls for a break, and when Tim returns to the courtroom with the evidence he had earlier overlooked, Miss Krempel immediately apologizes and hugs him. Even Judge Stone is moved.


Added DiffLines:

* SugarWiki/HeartwarmingMoments: In "Electric Current", Ms Krempel scolds Tim for stepping in before he had all the facts behind his case, and immediately regrets her remarks. She calls for a break, and when Tim returns to the courtroom with the evidence he had earlier overlooked, Miss Krempel immediately apologizes and hugs him. Even Judge Stone is moved.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misuse


* FunnyAneurysmMoment: A season one episode prominently featured a dog called "Wedgewood". Said episode was re-aired in the new format for season 2. The season 2 version aired roughly around the same time that a shooting occurred at "Wedgewood Baptist Church". If it wasn't for the season one version, this would technically be an unintentional TooSoon.

to:

* FunnyAneurysmMoment: A season one episode prominently featured a dog called "Wedgewood". Said episode was re-aired in the new format for season 2. The season 2 version aired roughly around the same time that a shooting occurred at "Wedgewood Baptist Church". If it wasn't for the season one version, this would technically be an unintentional TooSoon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CrowningMomentOfHeartwarming: In "Electric Current", Ms Krempel scolds Tim for stepping in before he had all the facts behind his case, and immediately regrets her remarks. She calls for a break, and when Tim returns to the courtroom with the evidence he had earlier overlooked, Miss Krempel immediately apologizes and hugs him. Even Judge Stone is moved.



* TheWoobie: Sternographer Fred is easily the most pitiful and endearing character in the series.

to:

* TheWoobie: Sternographer Stenographer Fred is easily the most pitiful and endearing character in the series.

Top