Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: Some might argue that Chisato is a {{hypocrite}} despite being an AllLovingHeroine of IncorruptiblePurePureness: while her use of non-lethal bullets is usually depicted for the spectator to see how noble she is, in a world as deadly as Lycoris Recoil's, one could argue that Chisato's behavior put her allies' lives at ever more risk, in contrast to DA's admittedly extreme stance of [[MurderIsTheBestSolution killing threats on sight to quickly and permanently put an end to them]]. Not to mention that in spite of her inexhaustible refusal to kill, her heroism means that her loved ones are outright driven to kill to save her instead, as they can't bear her leaving their lives. Some people outright think she's reckless and even selfish, given that the fact that her sparing of certain enemies, particularly [[spoiler:letting Shinji live and dying in his place]], implies that she'd be willing to let them continue hurting others in the long run just to avoid having to personally end them.
to:
* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: Some might argue that Chisato is a {{hypocrite}} despite being an AllLovingHeroine of IncorruptiblePurePureness: while her use of non-lethal bullets is usually depicted for the spectator to see how noble she is, in a world as deadly as Lycoris Recoil's, one could argue that Chisato's behavior [[ThouShaltNotKill behavior]] put her allies' lives at ever even more risk, in contrast to DA's admittedly extreme stance of [[MurderIsTheBestSolution killing threats on sight to quickly and permanently put an end to them]]. Not to mention that in spite of her inexhaustible refusal to kill, her heroism means that her loved ones are outright driven to kill to save her instead, as they can't bear her leaving their lives. Some people outright think she's reckless and even selfish, given that the fact that her sparing of certain enemies, particularly [[spoiler:letting Shinji live and dying in his place]], implies that she'd be willing to let them continue hurting others in the long run just to avoid having to personally end them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
According to rules, "To be fair" is wordcruft—so removing that word.
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical: Some Western reviewers have criticized the series for not doing enough to speak out against the show's perceived glorification of state violence and surveillance, as DA are portrayed as {{Well Intentioned Extremist}}s who uphold UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans and [[spoiler:they're still operating as normal in the end]] with little concern from the protagonists. To be fair, DA is seldom ''not'' portrayed as incredibly shady and morally absent, and the last section of the season not only shows how unsustainable it is, but [[spoiler:implies it's only a matter of time before more cracks start to show.]]
to:
* WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical: Some Western reviewers have criticized the series for not doing enough to speak out against the show's perceived glorification of state violence and surveillance, as DA are portrayed as {{Well Intentioned Extremist}}s who uphold UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans and [[spoiler:they're still operating as normal in the end]] with little concern from the protagonists. To be fair, However, DA is seldom are seldomly ''not'' portrayed as incredibly shady and morally absent, and the last section of the season not only shows how unsustainable it is, but [[spoiler:implies it's only a matter of time before more cracks start to show.]]show]].
