Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / HarryPotterAndTheMethodsOfRationality

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CrackPairing: [[spoiler:Sirius Black/Peter Pettigrew]]. Unsurprisingly, it apparently didn't end well.



* DracoInLeatherPants: At first, it appears this is going to be the case, with Draco and Harry getting along pretty well, but then Harry jokes about committing murder, and Draco not only isn't opposed to it, but doesn't understand that it was a joke. [[CardCarryingVillain He then says he's gonna rape Luna Lovegood someday.]] DracoInLeatherPants quickly fades.
** Chapter 72 shows that [[spoiler: he is on his way to a HeelFaceTurn]]
** Chapter 28 takes a jab at the fandom's tendency to do this to Snape.
** And chapter 77 delivers the finishing blow to his [[SelfFanservice fanon sexiness]].
** Lampshaded when Daphne Greengrass says Lucius Malfoy would skin his son alive and turn him into trousers if he heard him talking against blood purism.
---> "Draco Malfoy smiled, metallic robes gleaming in the light of his full corporeal Patronus; it was a smile both arrogant and dangerous, like being turned into a pair of leather pants was beneath his concerns."
* EvilIsCool: He makes it look so and Harry admits his arguments are very convincing and tempting.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AwesomeEgo: How the fans tend to view Harry. He is extremely arrogant, but he also happens to be a bordeline MagnificentBastard who achieves BeyondTheImpossible on daily basis.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BrokenBase: The "Self Actualization" arc faces a lot of criticism for being overdrawn, having relatively low stakes, being somewhat separated from the main plot and focusing on minor characters whom readers little reason to care about. Still, the plot is sufficiently complex and the themes sufficiently interesting for some people to enjoy that part of the story.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MemeticBadass: Professor Quirrell. The fans seem to be constantly at awe of his wit and intellect, to the point where the canon version of the character [[spoiler:- Voldemort that is -]] is often seen as a MemeticLoser by the fans of the story.

Added: 605

Changed: 289

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: If Harry's theory about how Fred and George pranked Rita Skeeter is correct then the lovable tricksters could be seen as [[spoiler: mind-raping someone with a false memory charm to destroy their career, thereby exposing them to the ire of very dangerous people. HarsherInHindsight much?]]

to:

* AlternativeCharacterInterpretation: AlternativeCharacterInterpretation:
** Harry can be viewed as a paragon of goodness and hope, a highly flawed hero, self-centered prick with only the barest of good intentions or even a borderline VillainProtagonist. It mostly depends on whether the reader agrees with Harry's philosophy and how much of Harry's smugness they are willing to tolerate.
**
If Harry's theory about how Fred and George pranked Rita Skeeter is correct then the lovable tricksters could be seen as [[spoiler: mind-raping someone with a false memory charm to destroy their career, thereby exposing them to the ire of very dangerous people. HarsherInHindsight much?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* StrawmanHasAPoint: Dumbledore, while debating Harry about death and immortality, was intended to be in the wrong and held a position that runs contrary to the author's worldview. Yet, in the eyes of many readers, Dumbledore made a better case than Harry did. His concern that Harry will go to far in his search for immortality is entirely justified given what happened to Voldemort and so is his belief in souls which he has some good evidence for. Meanwhile, Harry casually dismisses most of headmaster's arguments without bothering to think much about them, let alone test whether or not they are true, not to mention act like a real jerk throughout the whole conversation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RonTheDeathEater: Ron himself gets this treatment, as the author doesn't think too highly of him. He is portrayed as an unreasonable jerk as he insists that Harry is evil through InsaneTrollLogic, downright bullies Hermione for associating with him and is implied to be the one to loudly cheer [[spoiler: after a number of his fellow students lost their parents in the epilogue]]. His only role within the story is to serve as a butt of a joke every so often and to show

to:

* RonTheDeathEater: Ron himself gets this treatment, as the author doesn't think too highly of him. He is portrayed as an unreasonable jerk as he insists that Harry is evil through InsaneTrollLogic, downright bullies Hermione for associating with him and is implied to be the one to loudly cheer [[spoiler: after a number of his fellow students lost their parents in the epilogue]]. His only role within the story is to serve as a butt of a joke every so often and to show how much smarter the main cast is compared to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I don't think the original poster understood what the trope really entails. Nonetheless, it applies to this work.


* RonTheDeathEater: Subverted. While early on, Harry is very dismissive of Ron and it looks like he's going to be written out of the story, in chapter 31, [[spoiler:he shows up again, as one of two chief strategists in Hermione's army. Unlike Harry, Hermione is better at recognizing the talents of others, and Ron is a master chess player.]]

to:

* RonTheDeathEater: Subverted. While early on, Ron himself gets this treatment, as the author doesn't think too highly of him. He is portrayed as an unreasonable jerk as he insists that Harry is very dismissive of Ron and it looks like he's going to be written out of the story, in chapter 31, [[spoiler:he shows up again, as one of two chief strategists in Hermione's army. Unlike Harry, evil through InsaneTrollLogic, downright bullies Hermione for associating with him and is better at recognizing implied to be the talents one to loudly cheer [[spoiler: after a number of others, his fellow students lost their parents in the epilogue]]. His only role within the story is to serve as a butt of a joke every so often and Ron is a master chess player.]]to show
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** For those paying attention, the realization that the [[spoiler: Pioneer Plaque was turned into a horcrux]] is the reason that Quirrel is dying - he has separated out his life essence over such a large distance that light speed is becoming a real problem. This is obvious pretty early on for those who are familiar with relativity, and when he (much later) reads about Muggle physics, Quirrel realizes his mistake. That the starry field is also a view from around the [[spoiler:horcrux - and thus, Pioneer, far out in space]] - is also implied, but never stated outright.
*** Eventually {{Jossed}} in the final chapters.


* HypeBacklash: Some find the fic somewhat pretentious, and some readers [[http://www.journalfen.net/community/the_hms_stfu/492170.html interpret the narrative of Snape and Lily's relationship to be objectionable.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
All examples of Unfortunate Implications require critical citation.


* UnfortunateImplications: Harry's objections to Quirrell's fascism would make more sense if the idea that all but maybe six people aren't even sentient enough to be blamed for things wasn't such a core part of the story. Even besides the elitism, nobody has any social skills other than blatant manipulation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Redundant to call ymmv trope ymmv.


*** {YMMV} on the genius behind that, if you know how AI works.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** {YMMV} on the genius behind that, if you know how AI works.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
you put four potholes in two words and exactly one of them had anything to do with the words in question >:|


* FanNickname: [[PossessionSue Quirrel]][[DracoInLeatherPants mort]], [[NotMakingThisUpDisclaimer Harry]][[PossessionSue zer]].

to:

* FanNickname: [[PossessionSue Quirrel]][[DracoInLeatherPants mort]], [[NotMakingThisUpDisclaimer Harry]][[PossessionSue zer]].Quirrelmort, Harryzer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Eventually [[Jossed]] in the final chapters.

to:

*** Eventually [[Jossed]] {{Jossed}} in the final chapters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There's a long running debate within the fandom on whether Harry is a sociopath or not. The fact that the author admittedly is makes this an interesting one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The author, like a lot of readers, seems to have missed the point of Ron, and "sees no reason for him to exist". Canonically, [[TheMcCoy Ron represents emotion]], as [[TheSpock Hermione represents reason]]. Largely excising him from the story leaves out some great opportunities for character development for the hyper-rational Harry. On the other hand, their friendship was founded largely on Harry ''not'' being kind of a jerk.

to:

** The author, like a lot of readers, seems to have missed the point of Ron, and "sees no reason for him to exist". Canonically, [[TheMcCoy Ron represents emotion]], as [[TheSpock Hermione represents reason]]. Largely excising him from the story leaves out some great opportunities for character development for the hyper-rational Harry. On the other hand, their friendship was founded largely on Harry ''not'' being kind of a jerk. As in canon, friendships with Ron and Draco are probably mutually exclusive given how deeply they loathe each other.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not a trope


* JustForFun/XMeetsY: ''Literature/HarryPotter'' meets rationalism.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* JustForFun/XMeetsY: ''Literature/HarryPotter'' meets rationalism.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* LoveItOrHateIt: [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/reviews.php?target_group=FanFic&target_title=HarryPotterAndTheMethodsOfRationality Read the reviews (and their respective comments) on TV Tropes, and see for yourself just how polarizing the story is.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MagnificentBastard: Draco took lessons on how to be one, but so far he's only a beginner. The true MagnificentBastard of this fanfic is, of course the one and only Professor Quirrell/Lord Voldemort. Without spoiling anything:

to:

* MagnificentBastard: Draco took lessons on how to be one, but so far he's only a beginner. The true MagnificentBastard of this fanfic is, of course the one and only Professor [[spoiler:Professor Quirrell/Lord Voldemort.Voldemort]]. Without spoiling anything:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
can we not put blatant Complaining About Shows You Dont Like on the wiki, please?


** Even though if you haven't fallen in love with the author after chapter 10, the rest of the book becomes SoBadItsGood, PosessionSue, and CriticalResearchFailure in equal amounts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Even though if you haven't fallen in love with the author after chapter 10, the rest of the book becomes SoBadItsGood, PosessionSue, and CriticalResearchFailure in equal amounts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FanNickname: Quirrelmort, [[NamesToRunAwayFromReallyFast Harryzer]].

to:

* FanNickname: Quirrelmort, [[NamesToRunAwayFromReallyFast Harryzer]].[[PossessionSue Quirrel]][[DracoInLeatherPants mort]], [[NotMakingThisUpDisclaimer Harry]][[PossessionSue zer]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There's a long running debate within the fandom on whether Harry is a sociopath or not.

to:

** There's a long running debate within the fandom on whether Harry is a sociopath or not. The fact that the author admittedly is makes this an interesting one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
At least pretend a YMMV entry is impartial.


* BetterThanCanon: To some fans, although obviously this is ''very heavily'' dependent on everyone's tastes. Those who think so think it's better because it's cleverer and funnier, has more complex heroes and antagonists, makes more sense that the original book, and (to those sharing the author's worldview), a much saner [=Æ=]sop than the original books'.

to:

* BetterThanCanon: To some fans, although obviously this is ''very heavily'' dependent on everyone's tastes. Those who think so think it's better because it's cleverer and funnier, has more complex heroes and antagonists, makes more sense that the original book, and (to those sharing the author's worldview), a much saner [=Æ=]sop than the original books'.

Added: 309

Changed: 59

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The phsycology in general is oversimplified in the fic. The physics, however is uniformly terrible. For example, Harry's rant about shape shifting that appears as the page quote is correct in that it violates conservation of energy (which strangely didn't bother him when the levitation did it), but the details are nonsense suggesting the author knows the terms but not the underlying concepts (you actually can have unitarity without the Hamiltonian or conservation of energy and none of that has anything much to do with FTL signaling). Especially since he focuses on the relatively minor quantum effects instead of the reality-shattering and much more obvious implications in thermodynamics.

to:

** The phsycology psychology in general is oversimplified in the fic.fic, mostly just re-framing it to fit the AuthorTract better. The physics, however is uniformly terrible. For example, Harry's rant about shape shifting that appears as the page quote is correct in that it violates conservation of energy (which strangely didn't bother him when the levitation did it), but the details are nonsense suggesting the author knows the terms but not the underlying concepts (you actually can have unitarity without the Hamiltonian or conservation of energy and none of that has anything much to do with FTL signaling). Especially since he focuses on the relatively minor quantum effects instead of the reality-shattering and much more obvious implications in thermodynamics.


Added DiffLines:

* UnfortunateImplications: Harry's objections to Quirrell's fascism would make more sense if the idea that all but maybe six people aren't even sentient enough to be blamed for things wasn't such a core part of the story. Even besides the elitism, nobody has any social skills other than blatant manipulation.

Added: 934

Changed: 234

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalResearchFailure: The StanfordPrisonExperiment is taken at face value and treated as a serious piece of research; in real life it's considered a complete joke which functions as a checklist of how ''not'' to do research (as explained on its own page).

to:

* CriticalResearchFailure: CriticalResearchFailure:
**
The StanfordPrisonExperiment is taken at face value and treated as a serious piece of research; in real life it's considered a complete joke which functions as a checklist of how ''not'' to do research (as explained on its own page).page).
** The phsycology in general is oversimplified in the fic. The physics, however is uniformly terrible. For example, Harry's rant about shape shifting that appears as the page quote is correct in that it violates conservation of energy (which strangely didn't bother him when the levitation did it), but the details are nonsense suggesting the author knows the terms but not the underlying concepts (you actually can have unitarity without the Hamiltonian or conservation of energy and none of that has anything much to do with FTL signaling). Especially since he focuses on the relatively minor quantum effects instead of the reality-shattering and much more obvious implications in thermodynamics.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BetterThanCanon: To some fans, although obviously this is ''very heavily'' dependent on everyone's tastes. Those who think so think it's better because it's cleverer and funnier, has more complex heroes and antagonists, makes more sense that the original book, and (to those sharing the author's worldview), a much saner Æsop than the original books'.

to:

* BetterThanCanon: To some fans, although obviously this is ''very heavily'' dependent on everyone's tastes. Those who think so think it's better because it's cleverer and funnier, has more complex heroes and antagonists, makes more sense that the original book, and (to those sharing the author's worldview), a much saner Æsop [=Æ=]sop than the original books'.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***Eventually [[Jossed]] in the final chapters.

Top