Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / FirstKnight

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Even at the time, several critics singled out [[spoiler:Malagant's line "Nobody move or Arthur dies!"]] as laying on the modern touch a bit too much, [[spoiler:not helped by Malagant's men wielding pistol-like mini-crossbows exactly like handguns as they surround and aim at Arthur. They do use these crossbows for the entire movie, but this scene feels distinctly modern]].

to:

** Even at the time, several critics singled out [[spoiler:Malagant's line "Nobody move or Arthur dies!"]] as laying on the modern touch a bit too much, [[spoiler:not helped by Malagant's men wielding pistol-like mini-crossbows exactly like handguns as they surround and aim at Arthur. They do use these crossbows for the entire movie, but this scene feels distinctly modern]]. much.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Speaking of Clive Owen, his ''[[Film/KingArthur2004 King Arthur]]'' movie also had the baddies using crossbows to devastating effect unlike everyone else, [[spoiler:though this time Arthur survives and Lancelot shockingly dies]].


Added DiffLines:

** Even at the time, several critics singled out [[spoiler:Malagant's line "Nobody move or Arthur dies!"]] as laying on the modern touch a bit too much, [[spoiler:not helped by Malagant's men wielding pistol-like mini-crossbows exactly like handguns as they surround and aim at Arthur. They do use these crossbows for the entire movie, but this scene feels distinctly modern]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The next Arthurian film to hit cinemas just three years later was ''WesternAnimation/QuestForCamelot''. It has a similarly very blue color scheme for Arthur and Camelot while going to the opposite extreme with magical and fantastical elements. While ''First Knight'' has a stark lack of magic, going for a semblance of realism, ''Quest for Camelot'' has stuff like a talking two-headed dragon, a gryphon, a whole magical forest with sentient plants, men transformed into medieval cyborgs through sorcery, Excalibur magically knocking back someone several feet with just a parry... Even granting that one is live action and one is animated, watching the two back to back can feel like one is a bizarro-world version of the other. And on more minor notes, both feature Creator/JohnGielgud in a minor role, and a Film/JamesBond actor as Arthur (in the latter case, Creator/PierceBrosnan).[[note]]''Film/{{Dragonheart}}'' came earlier, one year after ''First Knight'', but the Arthurian connection is less direct. Although it has both Creator/SeanConnery and Gielgud too.[[/note]]
** A later [[Film/KingArthur2004 Arthur]], Creator/CliveOwen, later did a movie called ''Film/LastKnights'', oddly bookending the title of this one - though it's really less of an Arthurian movie than it is a take on UsefulNotes/The47Ronin, Western medieval-style.

to:

** The next Arthurian film to hit cinemas just three years later was ''WesternAnimation/QuestForCamelot''. It has a similarly very blue color scheme for Arthur and Camelot while going to the opposite extreme with magical and fantastical elements. While ''First Knight'' has a stark lack of magic, going for a semblance of realism, ''Quest for Camelot'' has stuff like a talking two-headed dragon, a gryphon, a whole magical forest with sentient plants, men transformed into medieval cyborgs through sorcery, Excalibur magically knocking back someone several feet with just a parry... Even granting that one is live action and one is animated, watching the two back to back can feel like one is a bizarro-world version of the other. And on more minor notes, both feature Creator/JohnGielgud in a minor role, and a Film/JamesBond actor as Arthur (in the latter case, Creator/PierceBrosnan).[[note]]''Film/{{Dragonheart}}'' came earlier, one year after ''First Knight'', but the Arthurian connection is less direct.direct, mainly through the worldbuilding/backstory. Although it has both Creator/SeanConnery and Gielgud too.[[/note]]
** A later [[Film/KingArthur2004 Arthur]], Creator/CliveOwen, later did a movie called ''Film/LastKnights'', oddly bookending the title of this one - though it's really less of an Arthurian movie than it is a take on UsefulNotes/The47Ronin, Western medieval-style. [[note]]Plus Owen was rumored to be a contender to succeed Brosnan as James Bond.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** A later [[Film/KingArthur2004 Arthur]], Creator/CliveOwen, later did a movie called ''Film/LastKnights'', oddly bookending the title of this one - though it's really less of an Arthurian movie than it is a take on UsefulNotes/The47Ronin, Western medieval-style.

Added: 583

Changed: 538

Removed: 169

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Creator/RalphIneson, here playing the chief henchman Ralf, was later promoted to the title character and main antagonist in ''Film/TheGreenKnight''.
* {{Narm}}:
** Now it can look very cute and naive, when the main characters of the film behave too democratically and liberally, which was fashionable to portray during the release of the film, but it was absolutely impossible in the Middle Ages. (There are academic studies discussing this as an important element in the "Americanization" of the Arthurian legends, as also seen in Disney's ''WesternAnimation/TheSwordInTheStone''.)



* {{Narm}}: Now it can look very cute and naive, when the main characters of the film behave too democratically and liberally, which was fashionable to portray during the release of the film, but it was absolutely impossible in the Middle Ages. (There are academic studies discussing this as an important element in the "Americanization" of the Arthurian legends, as also seen in Disney's ''WesternAnimation/TheSwordInTheStone''.)
* RetroactiveRecognition: A young Creator/AlexisDenisof, Creator/LiamCunningham, and ''{{Series/Highlander}}'' actor Valentine Pelka appear as three of Arthur’s knights.

to:

* {{Narm}}: Now it can look very cute and naive, when the main characters of the film behave too democratically and liberally, which was fashionable to portray during the release of the film, but it was absolutely impossible in the Middle Ages. (There are academic studies discussing this as an important element in the "Americanization" of the Arthurian legends, as also seen in Disney's ''WesternAnimation/TheSwordInTheStone''.)
* RetroactiveRecognition: A young Creator/AlexisDenisof, Creator/LiamCunningham, and ''{{Series/Highlander}}'' actor Valentine Pelka appear as three of Arthur’s knights.knights, and a young Creator/RalphIneson is Malagant's henchman Ralf.

Added: 1079

Changed: 1077

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: The next Arthurian film to hit cinemas just three years later was ''WesternAnimation/QuestForCamelot''. It has a similarly very blue color scheme for Arthur and Camelot while going to the opposite extreme with magical and fantastical elements. While ''First Knight'' has a stark lack of magic, going for a semblance of realism, ''Quest for Camelot'' has stuff like a talking two-headed dragon, a gryphon, a whole magical forest with sentient plants, men transformed into medieval cyborgs through sorcery, Excalibur magically knocking back someone several feet with just a parry... Even granting that one is live action and one is animated, watching the two back to back can feel like one is a bizarro-world version of the other. And on more minor notes, both feature Creator/JohnGielgud in a minor role, and a Film/JamesBond actor as Arthur (in the latter case, Creator/PierceBrosnan).[[note]]''Film/{{Dragonheart}}'' came earlier, one year after ''First Knight'', but the Arthurian connection is less direct. Although it has both Creator/SeanConnery and Gielgud too.[[/note]]

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: HilariousInHindsight:
**
The next Arthurian film to hit cinemas just three years later was ''WesternAnimation/QuestForCamelot''. It has a similarly very blue color scheme for Arthur and Camelot while going to the opposite extreme with magical and fantastical elements. While ''First Knight'' has a stark lack of magic, going for a semblance of realism, ''Quest for Camelot'' has stuff like a talking two-headed dragon, a gryphon, a whole magical forest with sentient plants, men transformed into medieval cyborgs through sorcery, Excalibur magically knocking back someone several feet with just a parry... Even granting that one is live action and one is animated, watching the two back to back can feel like one is a bizarro-world version of the other. And on more minor notes, both feature Creator/JohnGielgud in a minor role, and a Film/JamesBond actor as Arthur (in the latter case, Creator/PierceBrosnan).[[note]]''Film/{{Dragonheart}}'' came earlier, one year after ''First Knight'', but the Arthurian connection is less direct. Although it has both Creator/SeanConnery and Gielgud too.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindight: By sheer coincidence, in real life [[spoiler:Creator/SeanConnery and Creator/BenCross both died in 2020 with Cross going first,]] akin to their characters in the movie.

to:

* HarsherInHindight: HarsherInHindsight: By sheer coincidence, in real life [[spoiler:Creator/SeanConnery and Creator/BenCross both died in 2020 with Cross going first,]] akin to their characters in the movie.

Added: 190

Changed: 51

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HarsherInHindight: By sheer coincidence, in real life [[spoiler:Creator/SeanConnery and Creator/BenCross both died in 2020 with Cross going first,]] akin to their characters in the movie.



* RetroactiveRecognition: A young Creator/AlexisDenisof and ''{{Series/Highlander}}'' actor Valentine Pelka appear as two of Arthur’s knights.
* SignatureScene: The scene where the mortally wounded Malagant falls on the throne is what many people remember most from this film. This was due to the fact that this moment is often used in culture to depict a pathos chorus in dramatic scenes, or cool finishing off the main villain.

to:

* RetroactiveRecognition: A young Creator/AlexisDenisof Creator/AlexisDenisof, Creator/LiamCunningham, and ''{{Series/Highlander}}'' actor Valentine Pelka appear as two three of Arthur’s knights.
* SignatureScene: The scene where the [[spoiler:the mortally wounded Malagant falls on the throne throne]] is what many people remember most from this film. This was due to the fact that this moment is often used in culture to depict a pathos chorus in dramatic scenes, or cool [[spoiler:cool finishing off the main villain.villain]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)

Added DiffLines:

** It is impossible to chuckle when Guinevere exclaims "Camelot", when she first sees the city, once you have watched ''Film/MontyPythonAndTheHolyGrail''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: The next Arthurian film to hit cinemas just three years later was ''WesternAnimation/QuestForCamelot''. It has a similarly very blue color scheme for Arthur and Camelot while going to the opposite extreme with magical and fantastical elements. While ''First Knight'' has a stark lack of magic, going for a semblance of realism, ''Quest for Camelot'' has stuff like a talking dragon, a gryphon, a whole magical forest with sentient plants, men transformed into medieval cyborgs through sorcery, Excalibur magically knocking back a man several feet with just a parry... Even granting that one is live action and one is animated, watching the two back to back can feel like one is a bizarro-world version of the other. And on one minor note, both feature John Gielgud.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: The next Arthurian film to hit cinemas just three years later was ''WesternAnimation/QuestForCamelot''. It has a similarly very blue color scheme for Arthur and Camelot while going to the opposite extreme with magical and fantastical elements. While ''First Knight'' has a stark lack of magic, going for a semblance of realism, ''Quest for Camelot'' has stuff like a talking two-headed dragon, a gryphon, a whole magical forest with sentient plants, men transformed into medieval cyborgs through sorcery, Excalibur magically knocking back a man someone several feet with just a parry... Even granting that one is live action and one is animated, watching the two back to back can feel like one is a bizarro-world version of the other. And on one more minor note, notes, both feature John Gielgud. Creator/JohnGielgud in a minor role, and a Film/JamesBond actor as Arthur (in the latter case, Creator/PierceBrosnan).[[note]]''Film/{{Dragonheart}}'' came earlier, one year after ''First Knight'', but the Arthurian connection is less direct. Although it has both Creator/SeanConnery and Gielgud too.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: The next Arthurian film to hit cinemas just three years later was ''WesternAnimation/QuestForCamelot''. It has a similarly very blue color scheme for Arthur and Camelot while going to the opposite extreme with magical and fantastical elements. While ''First Knight'' has a stark lack of magic, going for a semblance of realism, ''Quest for Camelot'' has stuff like a talking dragon, a gryphon, a whole magical forest with sentient plants, men transformed into medieval cyborgs through sorcery, Excalibur magically knocking back a man several feet with just a parry... Even granting that one is live action and one is animated, watching the two back to back can feel like one is a bizarro-world version of the other.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: The next Arthurian film to hit cinemas just three years later was ''WesternAnimation/QuestForCamelot''. It has a similarly very blue color scheme for Arthur and Camelot while going to the opposite extreme with magical and fantastical elements. While ''First Knight'' has a stark lack of magic, going for a semblance of realism, ''Quest for Camelot'' has stuff like a talking dragon, a gryphon, a whole magical forest with sentient plants, men transformed into medieval cyborgs through sorcery, Excalibur magically knocking back a man several feet with just a parry... Even granting that one is live action and one is animated, watching the two back to back can feel like one is a bizarro-world version of the other. And on one minor note, both feature John Gielgud.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HilariousInHindsight: The next Arthurian film to hit cinemas just three years later was ''WesternAnimation/QuestForCamelot''. It has a similarly very blue color scheme for Arthur and Camelot while going to the opposite extreme with magical and fantastical elements. While ''First Knight'' has a stark lack of magic, going for a semblance of realism, ''Queet for Camelot'' has stuff like a talking dragon, a gryphon, a whole magical forest with sentient plants, men transformed into medieval cyborgs through sorcery, Excalibur magically knocking back a man several feet with just a parry... Even granting that one is live action and one is animated, watching the two back to back can feel like one is a bizarro-world version of the other.

to:

* HilariousInHindsight: The next Arthurian film to hit cinemas just three years later was ''WesternAnimation/QuestForCamelot''. It has a similarly very blue color scheme for Arthur and Camelot while going to the opposite extreme with magical and fantastical elements. While ''First Knight'' has a stark lack of magic, going for a semblance of realism, ''Queet ''Quest for Camelot'' has stuff like a talking dragon, a gryphon, a whole magical forest with sentient plants, men transformed into medieval cyborgs through sorcery, Excalibur magically knocking back a man several feet with just a parry... Even granting that one is live action and one is animated, watching the two back to back can feel like one is a bizarro-world version of the other.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HilariousInHindsight: The next Arthurian film to hit cinemas just three years later was ''WesternAnimation/QuestForCamelot''. It has a similarly very blue color scheme for Arthur and Camelot while going to the opposite extreme with magical and fantastical elements. While ''First Knight'' has a stark lack of magic, going for a semblance of realism, ''Queet for Camelot'' has stuff like a talking dragon, a gryphon, a whole magical forest with sentient plants, men transformed into medieval cyborgs through sorcery, Excalibur magically knocking back a man several feet with just a parry... Even granting that one is live action and one is animated, watching the two back to back can feel like one is a bizarro-world version of the other.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This film came later so it doesn't qualify.


* HilariousInHindsight: King Arthur would later bear witness to [[Franchise/IndianaJones another character]] mastering the art of jousting....[[Film/IndianaJonesAndTheLastCrusade with a flag pole for a lance.]]

Removed: 878

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* CompleteMonster: Prince [[NamesToRunAwayFrom Malagant]] is a former Knight of the Round Table who once served Myth/KingArthur of Camelot, but [[TheParagonAlwaysRebels turned rebel]] out of jealousy for the king. He and his followers frequently [[RapePillageAndBurn raid and burn]] villages to the grounds. Later, he and his knights capture Arthur's fiancé Guinevere and use her as a hostage for Arthur to give up his throne. In the end of the film, Malagant invades Camelot with his men and forces Arthur to [[KneelBeforeZod bow before him]] or else he will die and Camelot will be torched. Once Arthur defies him, Malagant sees him fatally injured and dies furiously ordering his men to burn Camelot to the ground. Malagant also employs full use of WeHaveReserves when he sacrifices a wave of soldiers just so Guinevere’s guards are out of position when the second wave hits.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CompleteMonster: Prince [[NamesToRunAwayFrom Malagant]] is a former Knight of the Round Table who once served KingArthur of Camelot, but [[TheParagonAlwaysRebels turned rebel]] out of jealousy for the king. He and his followers frequently [[RapePillageAndBurn raid and burn]] villages to the grounds. Later, he and his knights capture Arthur's fiancé Guinevere and use her as a hostage for Arthur to give up his throne. In the end of the film, Malagant invades Camelot with his men and forces Arthur to [[KneelBeforeZod bow before him]] or else he will die and Camelot will be torched. Once Arthur defies him, Malagant sees him fatally injured and dies furiously ordering his men to burn Camelot to the ground. Malagant also employs full use of WeHaveReserves when he sacrifices a wave of soldiers just so Guinevere’s guards are out of position when the second wave hits.

to:

* CompleteMonster: Prince [[NamesToRunAwayFrom Malagant]] is a former Knight of the Round Table who once served KingArthur Myth/KingArthur of Camelot, but [[TheParagonAlwaysRebels turned rebel]] out of jealousy for the king. He and his followers frequently [[RapePillageAndBurn raid and burn]] villages to the grounds. Later, he and his knights capture Arthur's fiancé Guinevere and use her as a hostage for Arthur to give up his throne. In the end of the film, Malagant invades Camelot with his men and forces Arthur to [[KneelBeforeZod bow before him]] or else he will die and Camelot will be torched. Once Arthur defies him, Malagant sees him fatally injured and dies furiously ordering his men to burn Camelot to the ground. Malagant also employs full use of WeHaveReserves when he sacrifices a wave of soldiers just so Guinevere’s guards are out of position when the second wave hits.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HilariousInHindsight: King Arthur would later bear witness to [[Franchise/IndianaJones another character]] mastering the art of jousting....[[Film/IndianaJonesAndTheLastCrusade with a flag pole for a lance.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RetroactiveRecognition: A young pre-''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''/''{{Series/Angel}}'' Alexis Denisof and ''{{Series/Highlander}}'' actor Valentine Pelka appear as two of Arthur’s knights.

to:

* RetroactiveRecognition: A young pre-''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''/''{{Series/Angel}}'' Alexis Denisof Creator/AlexisDenisof and ''{{Series/Highlander}}'' actor Valentine Pelka appear as two of Arthur’s knights.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* RetroactiveRecognition: A young pre-''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''/''{{Series/Angel}}'' Alexis Denisof and ''{{Series/Highlander}}}'' actor Valentine Pelka appear as two of Arthur’s knights.

to:

* RetroactiveRecognition: A young pre-''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''/''{{Series/Angel}}'' Alexis Denisof and ''{{Series/Highlander}}}'' ''{{Series/Highlander}}'' actor Valentine Pelka appear as two of Arthur’s knights.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* RetroactiveRecognition: A young pre-''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''/''{{Series/Angel}}'' Alexis Denisof and ''{{Series/Highlander}}}'' actor Valentine Pelka appear as two of Arthur’s knights.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Narm}}: Now it can look very cute and naive, when the main characters of the film behave too democratically and liberally, which was fashionable to portray during the release of the film, but it was absolutely impossible in the Middle Ages. (There are academic studies discussing this as an important element in the "Americanization" of the Arthurian legends, as also seen in Disney's ''Disney/TheSwordInTheStone''.)

to:

* {{Narm}}: Now it can look very cute and naive, when the main characters of the film behave too democratically and liberally, which was fashionable to portray during the release of the film, but it was absolutely impossible in the Middle Ages. (There are academic studies discussing this as an important element in the "Americanization" of the Arthurian legends, as also seen in Disney's ''Disney/TheSwordInTheStone''.''WesternAnimation/TheSwordInTheStone''.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ClicheStorm: Not much at the time of the release, but now this film plays for the drama too many cliche of adventure films.

to:

* ClicheStorm: Not much at the time of the release, but now this film plays for the drama too many cliche cliches of adventure films.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenAesop: Although the film clearly stands on the side of Lancelot in his love of the married queen, it does not work, since Creator/SeanConnery was a much more popular actor, and most of the audience was more sympathetic to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SoOkayItsAverage: The general critical reaction at the time. It suffered from comparisons to another medieval epic, the much grittier (and [[ArtisticLicenseHistory no less fantastic]]) ''Film/{{Braveheart}}''.

to:

* SoOkayItsAverage: The general critical reaction at the time. It suffered from comparisons to another medieval epic, epic which came out in the same year, the much grittier (and [[ArtisticLicenseHistory no less fantastic]]) ''Film/{{Braveheart}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* {{Narm}}: Now it can look very cute and naive, when the main characters of the film behave too democratically and liberally, which was fashionable to portray during the release of the film, but it was absolutely impossible in the Middle Ages.

to:

* {{Narm}}: Now it can look very cute and naive, when the main characters of the film behave too democratically and liberally, which was fashionable to portray during the release of the film, but it was absolutely impossible in the Middle Ages. (There are academic studies discussing this as an important element in the "Americanization" of the Arthurian legends, as also seen in Disney's ''Disney/TheSwordInTheStone''.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SoOkayItsAverage: The general critical reaction at the time. It suffered from comparisons to another medieval epic, the much grittier (and [[ArtisticLicenseHistory no less fantastic]]) ''Film/{{Braveheart}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BigLippedAlligatorMoment: After the question of his past, Lancelot suddenly experiences a flashback from his past, which asks many questions, but is no longer commented on in the future.
* BrokenAesop: Although the film clearly stands on the side of Lancelot in his love of the married queen, it does not work, since Creator/SeanConnery was a much more popular actor, and most of the audience was more sympathetic to him.
* ClicheStorm: Not much at the time of the release, but now this film plays for the drama too many cliche of adventure films.


Added DiffLines:

* {{Narm}}: Now it can look very cute and naive, when the main characters of the film behave too democratically and liberally, which was fashionable to portray during the release of the film, but it was absolutely impossible in the Middle Ages.
* SignatureScene: The scene where the mortally wounded Malagant falls on the throne is what many people remember most from this film. This was due to the fact that this moment is often used in culture to depict a pathos chorus in dramatic scenes, or cool finishing off the main villain.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
per Edit Requests thread

Added DiffLines:

* CompleteMonster: Prince [[NamesToRunAwayFrom Malagant]] is a former Knight of the Round Table who once served KingArthur of Camelot, but [[TheParagonAlwaysRebels turned rebel]] out of jealousy for the king. He and his followers frequently [[RapePillageAndBurn raid and burn]] villages to the grounds. Later, he and his knights capture Arthur's fiancé Guinevere and use her as a hostage for Arthur to give up his throne. In the end of the film, Malagant invades Camelot with his men and forces Arthur to [[KneelBeforeZod bow before him]] or else he will die and Camelot will be torched. Once Arthur defies him, Malagant sees him fatally injured and dies furiously ordering his men to burn Camelot to the ground. Malagant also employs full use of WeHaveReserves when he sacrifices a wave of soldiers just so Guinevere’s guards are out of position when the second wave hits.
----

Top