Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26 (click to see context) from:
** OJ Simpson was among those considered for the role of Dan. In the original ending, Dan is accused of killing Alex--by slashing her throat. Umm...
to:
** OJ Simpson Creator/OJSimpson was among those considered for the role of Dan. In the original ending, Dan is accused of killing Alex--by slashing her throat. Umm...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Seriously, we have a page for her. why have the sinkhole?
Changed line(s) 35 (click to see context) from:
* RetroactiveRecognition: A 18-year-old [[Series/ThirtyRock Jane Krakowski]] is babysitting for the Gallaghers in the beginning of the film.
to:
* RetroactiveRecognition: A 18-year-old [[Series/ThirtyRock Jane Krakowski]] Creator/JaneKrakowski is babysitting for the Gallaghers in the beginning of the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Example is not actually an example, and is purely speculative on if audiences would be more willing to sympathize with Alex or not (considering what she did by the end, that isn't a cut and dry case.)
Deleted line(s) 45 (click to see context) :
** Back then was a high point for audience entertainment with things like exciting showdowns, explosions, and wanting the hero to prevail and villain to finally be stopped, amongst other things. And there's the fact that mental health (particularly BPD) wasn't explored that well, while cheating and unempathetic behavior in relationships wasn't as well scrutinized and looked down as today. In more modern times, the original ending where Alex commits suicide and frames Dan would almost certainly be accepted, and she would be seen in a more sympathetic light, while Dan would be seen as an unsympathetic jerk.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* AwardSnub: Six UsefulNotes/AcademyAward nominations, zero wins. Worst still, the film was nominated in what turned out to be a very non-competitive year. It lost all six awards to either ''Film/TheLastEmperor'' or ''{{Film/Moonstruck}}'', both of which it has arguably since surpassed in longevity and impact. The fact that it is [[ConsolationAward often theorized that a potential factor in Music/{{Cher}} winning because she was snubbed a nomination from]] ''Film/{{Mask|1985}}'' doesn't help matters.
to:
* AwardSnub: Six UsefulNotes/AcademyAward nominations, zero wins. Worst still, the film was nominated in what turned out to be a very non-competitive year. It lost all six awards to either ''Film/TheLastEmperor'' or ''{{Film/Moonstruck}}'', both of which it has arguably since surpassed in longevity and impact. The fact that it is [[ConsolationAward often theorized that a potential factor in Music/{{Cher}} Cher winning because she was snubbed a nomination from]] ''Film/{{Mask|1985}}'' doesn't help matters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* AwardSnub: Six UsefulNotes/AcademyAward nominations, zero wins. Worst still, the film was nominated in what turned out to be a very non-competitive year. It lost all six awards to either ''Film/TheLastEmperor'' or ''{{Film/Moonstruck}}'', both of which it has arguably since surpassed in longevity and impact. The fact that it is [[ConsolationAward often theorized that a potential factor in ''Music/{{Cher}}'' winning because she was snubbed a nomination from]] ''Film/{{Mask|1985}}'' doesn't help matters.
to:
* AwardSnub: Six UsefulNotes/AcademyAward nominations, zero wins. Worst still, the film was nominated in what turned out to be a very non-competitive year. It lost all six awards to either ''Film/TheLastEmperor'' or ''{{Film/Moonstruck}}'', both of which it has arguably since surpassed in longevity and impact. The fact that it is [[ConsolationAward often theorized that a potential factor in ''Music/{{Cher}}'' Music/{{Cher}} winning because she was snubbed a nomination from]] ''Film/{{Mask|1985}}'' doesn't help matters.
