Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** Fans that do not consider it canon, agreeing with the attempted CanonDiscontinuity issued by Brian Herbert and preferring the prequels.
to:
** Fans that do not consider it canon, agreeing with the attempted CanonDiscontinuity issued by Brian Herbert and preferring the prequels.prequels (which contradict the back-stories the Encyclopedia gives).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** Fans that take the Encyclopedia as canon or sub-canon for gaps the books don't cover. Citing that it was published as an authorized companion book and endorsed by Frank Herbert.
to:
** Fans that take the Encyclopedia as canon or sub-canon for gaps the books don't cover. Citing cover, citing that it was published as an authorized companion book and endorsed by Frank Herbert.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* FanonDiscontinuity: Subject of this a lot, fans tend to fall into three groups.
** Fans that take the Encyclopedia as canon or sub-canon for gaps the books don't cover. Citing that it was published as an authorized companion book and endorsed by Frank Herbert.
** Fans that do not consider it canon, agreeing with the attempted CanonDiscontinuity issued by Brian Herbert and preferring the prequels.
** Fans that only consider the original six books by Frank Herbert as canon and exclude both the encyclopedia and prequels.
** Fans that take the Encyclopedia as canon or sub-canon for gaps the books don't cover. Citing that it was published as an authorized companion book and endorsed by Frank Herbert.
** Fans that do not consider it canon, agreeing with the attempted CanonDiscontinuity issued by Brian Herbert and preferring the prequels.
** Fans that only consider the original six books by Frank Herbert as canon and exclude both the encyclopedia and prequels.
