History YMMV / Clue

11th Dec '17 9:10:42 AM ProfessorDetective
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* PlotHole: If the weapon is the Revolver, then how did no one hear the gunshot? The 2008 SettingUpdate closes this hole by swapping the Revolver for a semi-automatic Pistol with a suppressor clearly attached.
29th Nov '17 4:14:37 PM Mimic1990
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** After the first couple murders, Wadsworth plans on locking up the remaining weapons so they can't be used to murder anyone else. This is all great in theory ... but he doesn't lock up the Candlestick or the Knife that have already been used. Just because they were used once to kill someone, it doesn't make them any less deadly to be used again. Alternately, the killer in all three endings ''also'' never thinks about this, and has to steal the key from Wadsworth (or plan on breaking open the cupboard) instead of just picking up one of the previously used weapons. Or for that matter [[ImprovisedWeapon just picked up one of the numerous candlesticks, kitchen knives, pieces of lead pipe, and other potential weapons that are lying randomly around the house and are not locked in the cupboard]].

to:

** After the first couple murders, Wadsworth plans on locking up the remaining weapons so they can't be used to murder anyone else. This is all great in theory ... but he doesn't lock up the Candlestick or the Knife that have already been used. Just because they were used once to kill someone, it doesn't make them any less deadly to be used again. Alternately, the killer in all three endings ''also'' never thinks about this, and has to steal the key from Wadsworth (or plan on breaking open the cupboard) instead of just picking up one of the previously used weapons. Or for that matter [[ImprovisedWeapon just picked picking up one of the numerous candlesticks, kitchen knives, pieces of lead pipe, and other potential weapons that are lying randomly around the house and are not locked in the cupboard]].
29th Nov '17 4:13:28 PM Mimic1990
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** After the first couple murders, Wadsworth plans on locking up the remaining weapons so they can't be used to murder anyone else. This is all great in theory ... but he doesn't lock up the Candlestick or the Knife that have already been used. Just because they were used once to kill someone, it doesn't make them any less deadly to be used again. Alternately, the killer in all three endings ''also'' never thinks about this, and has to steal the key from Wadsworth (or plan on breaking open the cupboard) instead of just picking up one of the previously used weapons.

to:

** After the first couple murders, Wadsworth plans on locking up the remaining weapons so they can't be used to murder anyone else. This is all great in theory ... but he doesn't lock up the Candlestick or the Knife that have already been used. Just because they were used once to kill someone, it doesn't make them any less deadly to be used again. Alternately, the killer in all three endings ''also'' never thinks about this, and has to steal the key from Wadsworth (or plan on breaking open the cupboard) instead of just picking up one of the previously used weapons. Or for that matter [[ImprovisedWeapon just picked up one of the numerous candlesticks, kitchen knives, pieces of lead pipe, and other potential weapons that are lying randomly around the house and are not locked in the cupboard]].
18th Oct '17 9:31:07 AM Chiron723
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** "There's just one thing I don't understand (One Thing?!)..."
22nd Jul '17 12:13:53 PM DarkMask
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** After the first couple murders, Wadsworth plans on locking up the remaining weapons so they can't be used to murder anyone else. This is all great in theory ... but he doesn't lock up the Candlestick or the Knife that have already been used. Just because they were used once to kill someone, it doesn't make them any less deadly to be used again.

to:

** After the first couple murders, Wadsworth plans on locking up the remaining weapons so they can't be used to murder anyone else. This is all great in theory ... but he doesn't lock up the Candlestick or the Knife that have already been used. Just because they were used once to kill someone, it doesn't make them any less deadly to be used again. Alternately, the killer in all three endings ''also'' never thinks about this, and has to steal the key from Wadsworth (or plan on breaking open the cupboard) instead of just picking up one of the previously used weapons.
22nd Jul '17 12:08:40 PM DarkMask
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* WhatAnIdiot: A point could be made for [[spoiler:Miss Scarlet in her ending as the murderer. Not so much for anything to do about miscounting the bullets, but that she made her case to extort secrets from the other guests at gun point with the threat of blackmail to keep them in line. Problem is, she then plans to kill Wadsworth on the spot ... with a gun that only has one bullet left. The moment she wasted her bullet on him and loses her immediate leverage, what was to stop any of the other guests from just grabbing her and subduing her?]]

to:

* WhatAnIdiot: WhatAnIdiot:
**
A point could be made for [[spoiler:Miss Scarlet in her ending as the murderer. Not so much for anything to do about miscounting the bullets, but that she made her case to extort secrets from the other guests at gun point with the threat of blackmail to keep them in line. Problem is, she then plans to kill Wadsworth on the spot ... with a gun that only has one bullet left. The moment she wasted her bullet on him and loses her immediate leverage, what was to stop any of the other guests from just grabbing her and subduing her?]]her?]]
** After the first couple murders, Wadsworth plans on locking up the remaining weapons so they can't be used to murder anyone else. This is all great in theory ... but he doesn't lock up the Candlestick or the Knife that have already been used. Just because they were used once to kill someone, it doesn't make them any less deadly to be used again.
22nd Jul '17 12:05:16 PM DarkMask
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* PlotHole: [[spoiler:In her murderer ending, Mrs. Scarlet plans on blackmailing all of the guests for government information, including Mrs. White just because her husband was a nuclear physicist. Ignoring the fact Mrs. White's husband is dead and (seeing as she's had 5 husbands and this was her second) has been for presumably a while, why would the wife of a nuclear physicist have access to any of his highly classified secrets regarding a secret fusion bomb?]]

to:

* PlotHole: [[spoiler:In her murderer ending, Mrs. Scarlet plans on blackmailing all of the guests for government information, including Mrs. White just because her husband was a nuclear physicist. Ignoring the fact Mrs. White's husband is dead and (seeing as she's had 5 husbands and this was her second) has been for presumably a while, why would the wife of a nuclear physicist have access to any of his highly classified secrets info regarding a secret fusion bomb?]]
22nd Jul '17 12:04:42 PM DarkMask
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* PlotHole: [[spoiler:In her murderer ending, Mrs. Scarlet plans on blackmailing all of the guests for government information, including Mrs. White just because her husband was a nuclear physicist. Ignoring the fact Mrs. White's husband is dead and (seeing as she's had 5 husbands and this was her second) has been for presumably a while, why would the wife of a nuclear physicist have access to any of his highly classified secrets regarding a secret fusion bomb?]]
22nd Jul '17 11:40:02 AM DarkMask
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* WhatAnIdiot: A point could be made for [[spoiler:Miss Scarlet in her ending as the murderer. Not so much for anything to do about miscounting the bullets, but that she made her case to extort secrets from the other guests at gun point with the threat of blackmail to keep them in line. Problem is, she then plans to kill Wadsworth on the spot ... with a gun that only has one bullet left. The moment she wasted her bullet on him and loses her immediate leverage, what was top stop any of the other guests from just grabbing her and subduing her?]]

to:

* WhatAnIdiot: A point could be made for [[spoiler:Miss Scarlet in her ending as the murderer. Not so much for anything to do about miscounting the bullets, but that she made her case to extort secrets from the other guests at gun point with the threat of blackmail to keep them in line. Problem is, she then plans to kill Wadsworth on the spot ... with a gun that only has one bullet left. The moment she wasted her bullet on him and loses her immediate leverage, what was top to stop any of the other guests from just grabbing her and subduing her?]]
22nd Jul '17 11:39:32 AM DarkMask
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* WhatAnIdiot: A point could be made for [[spoiler:Miss Scarlet in her ending as the murderer. Not so much for anything to do about miscounting the bullets, but that she made her case to extort secrets from the other guests at gun point with the threat of blackmail to keep them in line. Problem is, she then plans to kill Wadsworth on the spot ... with a gun that only has one bullet left. The moment she wasted her bullet on him and loses her immediate leverage, what was top stop any of the other guests from just grabbing her and subduing her?]]
This list shows the last 10 events of 66. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=YMMV.Clue