Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WhatAnIdiot / TheApprentice

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In Week 8, project manager Noor, against the advice of the rest of her team, directs an advert that only shows the van her team is supposed to be advertising for a few seconds at the very end, and not even moving during those few seconds. This causes the team to lose, despite the other team's advert being poor in its own right. On top of that the team's logo is highlighted as a serious problem, and in the task post-mortem Foluso and Phil angrily blame each other for it.\\
'''You'd Expect:''' Noor to admit that she got so caught up in what she was making that she forgot to make the advert informative, but add that Foluso and Phil's logo would have doomed them regardless. Then she can bring them both into the final boardroom and let them duke it out.\\
'''Instead:''' She tries to blame Tre for the loss, even after Karren points out that he made a valid argument by saying that Noor wasn't prioritising filming the most important shots. However, she makes a much more fundamental error by twice ''refusing to admit that the advert was bad''. After she defends it as being better than the other team's advert for the second time, an exasperated Lord Sugar deems her such a lost cause that he fires her there and then without asking her who she wants to bring back, making this only the second time in the show's history that no final boardroom took place.[[note]]The first was in Season 1 where Adele resigned in the fourth episode's initial boardroom, with the show's rules at the time meaning that if a candidate left of their own accord for any reason, Sugar couldn't fire anyone else that week.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


"'You'd Expect:'" For project manager Asif to realise that he's been given an essential godsend of a prompt that could secure the investment to win the task, and agree that it is supposed to be surreal. It may throw his team for a loop on how to discuss the game's merits as it's not what they had prepared, but the expert is clearly supportive of what they've produced and keeping them on board is tantamount to success.\\
"'Instead:'" He instantly rejects any notion that his game is meant to be anything but realistic. This not only earns a scornful verbal response from the experts but loses Supream a potential further £100,000 investment which they would have received if Asif had agreed that the game was intentionally surreal.

to:

"'You'd Expect:'" '''You'd Expect:''' For project manager Asif to realise that he's been given an essential godsend of a prompt that could secure the investment to win the task, and agree that it is supposed to be surreal. It may throw his team for a loop on how to discuss the game's merits as it's not what they had prepared, but the expert is clearly supportive of what they've produced and keeping them on board is tantamount to success.\\
"'Instead:'" '''Instead:''' He instantly rejects any notion that his game is meant to be anything but realistic. This not only earns a scornful verbal response from the experts but loses Supream a potential further £100,000 investment which they would have received if Asif had agreed that the game was intentionally surreal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In Week 3, the teams have to design their own virtual escape rooms. Team Supream's concept, Fallen Escape, involves participants playing the parts of soldiers escaping from a downed helicopter. Along the way, they encounter bears as an obstacle near a gas station, which for some reason perform a little dance when the game is won. This element in particular is singled out by the experts assessing the games, with one outright telling the team that if it's meant to be surreal then it's a brilliant concept.
"'You'd Expect:'" For project manager Asif to realise that he's been given an essential godsend of a prompt that could secure the investment to win the task, and agree that it is supposed to be surreal. It may throw his team for a loop on how to discuss the game's merits as it's not what they had prepared, but the expert is clearly supportive of what they've produced and keeping them on board is tantamount to success.

to:

* In Week 3, the teams have to design their own virtual escape rooms. Team Supream's concept, Fallen Escape, involves participants playing the parts of soldiers escaping from a downed helicopter. Along the way, they encounter bears as an obstacle near a gas station, which for some reason perform a little dance when the game is won. This element in particular is singled out by the experts assessing the games, with one outright telling the team that if it's meant to be surreal then it's a brilliant concept.
concept.\\
"'You'd Expect:'" For project manager Asif to realise that he's been given an essential godsend of a prompt that could secure the investment to win the task, and agree that it is supposed to be surreal. It may throw his team for a loop on how to discuss the game's merits as it's not what they had prepared, but the expert is clearly supportive of what they've produced and keeping them on board is tantamount to success.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In Week 3, the teams have to design their own virtual escape rooms. Team Supream's concept, Fallen Escape, involves participants playing the parts of soldiers escaping from a downed helicopter. Along the way, they encounter bears as an obstacle near a gas station, which for some reason perform a little dance when the game is won. This element in particular is singled out by the experts assessing the games, with one outright telling the team that if it's meant to be surreal then it's a brilliant concept.
"'You'd Expect:'" For project manager Asif to realise that he's been given an essential godsend of a prompt that could secure the investment to win the task, and agree that it is supposed to be surreal. It may throw his team for a loop on how to discuss the game's merits as it's not what they had prepared, but the expert is clearly supportive of what they've produced and keeping them on board is tantamount to success.
"'Instead:'" He instantly rejects any notion that his game is meant to be anything but realistic. This not only earns a scornful verbal response from the experts but loses Supream a potential further £100,000 investment which they would have received if Asif had agreed that the game was intentionally surreal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Season numbering fix


[[folder:Season 17]]

to:

[[folder:Season 17]]18]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Season 17]]
* In Week 1, while half the team are giving tours to corporate clients, the other half are doing kitchen work. On each team, one half makes an idiotic error:
** The girls are making fish cakes for lunch and rhubarb crumble for dessert.\\
'''You'd Expect:''' For them to double check what ingredients goes with what recipe. And if there is a mixup or a wrong ingredient is otherwise used, for someone to notice it immediately.\\
'''Instead:''' They mistake the crumble for the rhubarb for breadcrumbs and use it to coat the fish cakes, and they only realise the error after the rest of the team and the clients come back and lunch is served. Fortunately, it doesn’t impact their earnings as much as the below mistake.
** Meanwhile, the boys have set a time between 2 and 2:30 for their clients to have their lunch.\\
'''You'd Expect:''' For someone to remind [=PM=] Virdi of the arrangement so the clients can have their lunch, get their dessert and take part in their team-building activity.\\
'''Instead:''' Not one member of Virdi’s sub-team thinks of this, not even Virdi himself, resulting in them arriving late. Because the team had agreed that the food would be cooked at this point, they have to rush to heat the food as a result, and even that isn’t done properly. Then, insult to injury, the delay leaves no time for dessert and the clients have only four minutes to leave when they come round to the team-building. This contributes to their loss, for which Virdi would have been fired had Ollie not be seen as useless by the others and by Sugar.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Instead:''' She has the "O" replaced with bowls, which makes the brand name look like "First Time Dies".\\

to:

'''Instead:''' She has the "O" replaced with bowls, which makes the brand name look like "First Time F..Dies".\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Instead''': Natasha keeps on insisting they invested heavily on day one and need to shift the stock they have, Jim makes repeated requests to reinvest but Natasha only lets him invest £20 pounds.
** '''Result''': Lord Sugar is furious when he discovers Natasha's refusal to reinvest and strips Venture of their reward.\\

to:

'''Instead''': Natasha keeps on insisting they invested heavily on day one and need to shift the stock they have, Jim makes repeated requests to reinvest but Natasha only lets him invest £20 pounds. \n** \\
'''Result''': Lord Sugar is furious when he discovers Natasha's refusal to reinvest and strips Venture of their reward.\\



* Team Logic members Melody and Helen firmly grasp the IdiotBall with the reinvestment task, by adopting a strategy of selling to retailers directly. They get a potential duvet order from a shop owner, but to get the stock, Helen must stop selling on the second day and go on a long car journey across London.
** '''You'd Expect''': For both Helen and Melody to abandon this flawed strategy and for Helen to carry on selling.\\
** '''Instead''': Melody tells Helen to buy the duvets.\\
** '''Result''': By the time Helen gets back with the duvets, the shop has closed, making the whole journey AllForNothing. This leads to Helen losing her first task and her retail strategy being heavily criticised by Lord Sugar.
* During the task Tom advises Melody that the stock of nodding dogs have sold very well.
** '''You'd Expect''': For Melody to buy more nodding dogs when going to the wholesalers as the whole point of the task is to reinvest in stock that sells well.\\
** '''Instead''': Melody ignores Tom's advice and buys digital items.\\
** '''Result''': Melody's team lose the task and she gets fired.

to:

* Team Logic members Melody and Helen firmly grasp the IdiotBall with the reinvestment task, by adopting a strategy of selling to retailers directly. They get a potential duvet order from a shop owner, but to get the stock, Helen must stop selling on the second day and go on a long car journey across London. \n** '''You'd Expect''': For both Helen and Melody to abandon this flawed strategy and for Helen to carry on selling.\\
** '''Instead''': '''You'd Expect''': For both Helen and Melody tells to abandon this flawed strategy and for Helen to buy the duvets.carry on selling.\\
** '''Instead''': Melody tells Helen to buy the duvets.\\
'''Result''': By the time Helen gets back with the duvets, the shop has closed, making the whole journey AllForNothing. This leads to Helen losing her first task and her retail strategy being heavily criticised by Lord Sugar.
* During the task Tom advises Melody that the stock of nodding dogs have sold very well.
** '''You'd Expect''': For Melody to buy more nodding dogs when going to the wholesalers as the whole point of the task is to reinvest in stock that sells
well.\\
** '''Instead''': '''You'd Expect''': For Melody ignores Tom's advice and buys digital items.to buy more nodding dogs when going to the wholesalers as the whole point of the task is to reinvest in stock that sells well.\\
** '''Instead''': Melody ignores Tom's advice and buys digital items.\\
'''Result''': Melody's team lose the task and she gets fired.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''As a Result:''' What followed was the first ''multi-firing'' of the show's history, as Trump [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech criticized all of them]] in detail before unceremoniously telling the four of them to go home (and they were forced to share the exit cab in a [[SugarWiki/FunnyMoments funny moment]].

to:

'''As a Result:''' What followed was the first ''multi-firing'' of the show's history, as Trump [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech criticized all of them]] in detail before unceremoniously telling the four of them to go home (and they were forced to share the exit cab in a [[SugarWiki/FunnyMoments funny moment]].moment]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the tenth episode, both teams are given £250 of items to sell to the public, reinvesting in items that sell well. Ventura elects Natasha to be their team leader, they reinvest heavily on day one and sell, Jim then asks Natasha about reinvestment.\\

to:

* In the tenth episode, both teams are given £250 of items to sell to the public, reinvesting in items that sell well. Ventura Venture elects Natasha to be their team leader, they reinvest heavily on day one and sell, Jim then asks Natasha about reinvestment.\\



** '''Result''': Lord Sugar is furious when he discovers Natasha's refusal to reinvest and strips Ventura of their reward.\\
'''Worse Still''': Natasha goes into NeverMyFault mode and feels that Susan, who she argued with is responsible for the loss.

to:

** '''Result''': Lord Sugar is furious when he discovers Natasha's refusal to reinvest and strips Ventura Venture of their reward.\\
'''Worse Still''': Natasha goes into NeverMyFault mode and feels that Susan, who she argued with with, is responsible for the loss.



* In the twelfth episode, each team must invent a new fast-food outlet, Jim is Team Leader for Ventura and decides to create a Mexican themed restaurant. Natasha has boasted about having a degree in hospitality and Jim decides to have her handle the production of the food. However, Natasha says she can't cook and asks to be on the branding team, which has Susan who she does not get along with.\\

to:

* In the twelfth episode, each team must invent a new fast-food outlet, Jim is Team Leader for Ventura Venture and decides to create a Mexican themed restaurant. Natasha has boasted about having a degree in hospitality and Jim decides to have her handle the production of the food. However, Natasha says she can't cook and asks to be on the branding team, which has Susan who she does not get along with.\\



'''Result''': Ventura ends up losing the task due to providing a poor service and an embarrassing pitch in front of Lord Sugar and his industry expert who evaluate their concept. Jim is left under intense scrutiny and has Susan and Natasha gang up on him in the Boardroom. However, Lord Sugar fires Natasha for not using her degree.

to:

'''Result''': Ventura Venture ends up losing the task due to providing a poor service and an embarrassing pitch in front of Lord Sugar and his industry expert who evaluate their concept. Jim is left under intense scrutiny and has Susan and Natasha gang up on him in the Boardroom. However, Lord Sugar fires Natasha for not using her degree.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Team Logic members Melody and Helen firmly grasp the IdiotBall with the reinvestment task, by adopting a strategy of selling to retailers directly. They get a potential duvet order from a shop owner, but to gt the stock, Helen must stop selling on the second day and go on a long car journey across London.

to:

* Team Logic members Melody and Helen firmly grasp the IdiotBall with the reinvestment task, by adopting a strategy of selling to retailers directly. They get a potential duvet order from a shop owner, but to gt get the stock, Helen must stop selling on the second day and go on a long car journey across London.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Team Logic members Melody and Helen firmly grasp the IdiotBall with the reinvestment task, by adopting a strategy of selling to retailers directly. They get a potential duvet order from a shop owner, but to get them, Helen must stop selling on the second day and go on a long journey across London.

to:

* Team Logic members Melody and Helen firmly grasp the IdiotBall with the reinvestment task, by adopting a strategy of selling to retailers directly. They get a potential duvet order from a shop owner, but to get them, gt the stock, Helen must stop selling on the second day and go on a long car journey across London.



** '''Instead''': Melody tells Helen to buy the duvets, forcing Helen to go on a long car for the rest of the day.\\
** '''Result''': By the time Helen gets back with the duvets the shop has closed, making the whole journey AllForNothing. This leads to Helen losing her first task and her retail strategy being heavily criticised by Lord Sugar.

to:

** '''Instead''': Melody tells Helen to buy the duvets, forcing Helen to go on a long car for the rest of the day.duvets.\\
** '''Result''': By the time Helen gets back with the duvets duvets, the shop has closed, making the whole journey AllForNothing. This leads to Helen losing her first task and her retail strategy being heavily criticised by Lord Sugar.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''As a result:''' Both Natalie and Vana turn on Aisha in the boardroom, and despite Natalie’s poor defence, Lord Sugar considers Aisha completely responsible and fires her.\\

to:

'''As a result:''' Both Natalie and Vana turn on Aisha in the boardroom, and despite Natalie’s poor defence, Lord Sugar considers Aisha completely responsible and fires her.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The second episode of the season (create an advertising campaign for a bottle of shampoo) sees the girl team lose decisively with PM Aisha being accused of a dictator on multiple front. However she claims that no one else had idea when designing the bottle. She has to decide who to bring back.
'''You’d Expect:''' Aisha would bring back Natalie (who delivered a poor pitch despite her experience) and Selina (who directed the awful TV advert), both of whom played a major role in the task failure.
'''Or:''' She could bring back April and Elle, both of which did nothing on the task, the latter of whom spent most of the time complaining about things without finding solutions. This would prove her previous statement and her original statement that “anyone not contributing would be brought back”.
''' Instead:''' She brings in Natalie… and Vana, who pushed for the grey-pound (over 50s) market against Aisha wanting to push for a universal market, which had nothing to do with the failure of the task.
'''As a result:''' Both Natalie and Vana turn on Aisha in the boardroom, and despite Natalie’s poor defence, Lord Sugar considers Aisha completely responsible and fires her.

to:

* The second episode of the season (create an advertising campaign for a bottle of shampoo) sees the girl team lose decisively with PM Aisha being accused of a dictator on multiple front. However she claims that no one else had idea when designing the bottle. She has to decide who to bring back.
back.\\
'''You’d Expect:''' Aisha would bring back Natalie (who delivered a poor pitch despite her experience) and Selina (who directed the awful TV advert), both of whom played a major role in the task failure.
failure.\\
'''Or:''' She could bring back April and Elle, both of which did nothing on the task, the latter of whom spent most of the time complaining about things without finding solutions. This would prove her previous statement and her original statement that “anyone not contributing would be brought back”.
back”.\\
''' Instead:''' She brings in Natalie… and Vana, who pushed for the grey-pound (over 50s) market against Aisha wanting to push for a universal market, which had nothing to do with the failure of the task.
task.\\
'''As a result:''' Both Natalie and Vana turn on Aisha in the boardroom, and despite Natalie’s poor defence, Lord Sugar considers Aisha completely responsible and fires her.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


‘’’You’d Expect:’’’ Aisha would bring back Natalie (who delivered a poor pitch despite her experience) and Selina (who directed the awful TV advert), both of whom played a major role in the task failure.
‘’’Or:’’’ She could bring back April and Elle, both of which did nothing on the task, the latter of whom spent most of the time complaining about things without finding solutions. This would prove her previous statement and her original statement that “anyone not contributing would be brought back”.
‘’’Instead:’’’ She brings in Natalie… and Vana, who pushed for the grey-pound (over 50s) market against Aisha wanting to push for a universal market, which had nothing to do with the failure of the task.
‘’’As a result:’’’ Both Natalie and Vana turn on Aisha in the boardroom, and despite Natalie’s poor defence, Lord Sugar considers Aisha completely responsible and fires her.

to:

‘’’You’d Expect:’’’ '''You’d Expect:''' Aisha would bring back Natalie (who delivered a poor pitch despite her experience) and Selina (who directed the awful TV advert), both of whom played a major role in the task failure.
‘’’Or:’’’ '''Or:''' She could bring back April and Elle, both of which did nothing on the task, the latter of whom spent most of the time complaining about things without finding solutions. This would prove her previous statement and her original statement that “anyone not contributing would be brought back”.
‘’’Instead:’’’ ''' Instead:''' She brings in Natalie… and Vana, who pushed for the grey-pound (over 50s) market against Aisha wanting to push for a universal market, which had nothing to do with the failure of the task.
‘’’As '''As a result:’’’ result:''' Both Natalie and Vana turn on Aisha in the boardroom, and despite Natalie’s poor defence, Lord Sugar considers Aisha completely responsible and fires her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The second episode of the season (create an advertising campaign for a bottle of shampoo) sees the girl team lose decisively with PM Aisha being accused of a dictator on multiple front. However she claims that no one else had idea when designing the bottle. She has to decide who to bring back.
‘’’You’d Expect:’’’ Aisha would bring back Natalie (who delivered a poor pitch despite her experience) and Selina (who directed the awful TV advert), both of whom played a major role in the task failure.
‘’’Or:’’’ She could bring back April and Elle, both of which did nothing on the task, the latter of whom spent most of the time complaining about things without finding solutions. This would prove her previous statement and her original statement that “anyone not contributing would be brought back”.
‘’’Instead:’’’ She brings in Natalie… and Vana, who pushed for the grey-pound (over 50s) market against Aisha wanting to push for a universal market, which had nothing to do with the failure of the task.
‘’’As a result:’’’ Both Natalie and Vana turn on Aisha in the boardroom, and despite Natalie’s poor defence, Lord Sugar considers Aisha completely responsible and fires her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the tenth episode, both teams are given £250 o items to sell to the public, reinvesting in items that sell well. Lord Sugar makes it clear that any leftover stock is fine. Ventura elects Natasha to be their team leader, they reinvest heavily on day one and sell a lot of stock due to Jim, who asks Natasha about reinvestment.\\

to:

* In the tenth episode, both teams are given £250 o of items to sell to the public, reinvesting in items that sell well. Lord Sugar makes it clear that any leftover stock is fine. Ventura elects Natasha to be their team leader, they reinvest heavily on day one and sell a lot of stock due to Jim, who sell, Jim then asks Natasha about reinvestment.\\



'''Instead''': Natasha keeps on insisting they have invested heavily on day one and need to shift the stock they have, Jim makes repeated requests to reinvest but Natasha only lets him invest £20 pounds.
** '''Result''': Lord Sugar is left furious when he discovers Natasha's refusal to reinvest and accuses her of not having any courage and strips them of their reward.\\

to:

'''Instead''': Natasha keeps on insisting they have invested heavily on day one and need to shift the stock they have, Jim makes repeated requests to reinvest but Natasha only lets him invest £20 pounds.
** '''Result''': Lord Sugar is left furious when he discovers Natasha's refusal to reinvest and accuses her of not having any courage and strips them Ventura of their reward.\\



** '''You'd Expect''': For both Helen and Melody to simply abandon this flawed strategy and for Helen to carry on selling.\\

to:

** '''You'd Expect''': For both Helen and Melody to simply abandon this flawed strategy and for Helen to carry on selling.\\



** '''Result''': Melody's purchases and actions cause her team to lose and she is fired.

to:

** '''Result''': Melody's purchases and actions cause her team to lose the task and she is gets fired.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the tenth episode, both teams are given £250 of wholesale items to sell to the public over two days, reinvesting in items that sell well. Lord Sugar makes it clear that any leftover stock is fine. Ventura elects Natasha to be their team leader, they reinvest heavily on day one and sell a lot of stock due to Jim, who phones Natasha and asks about reinvestment.\\
'''You'd Expect''': Natasha to remember the key goal of the task is to reinvest and any leftover stock is fine.\\
'''Instead''': Natasha keeps on insisting that they've invested heavily on day one and need to shift the stock they have, Jim makes repeated requests to reinvest yet Natasha only lets him invest £20 pounds.
** '''Result''': Lord Sugar is left furious when he discovers Natasha's refusal to reinvest and doesn't accept her excuse of having invested heavily on day one. Sugar accuses her of not having any courage and even though Ventura wins the task, he strips them of their reward because of Natasha's actions.\\
'''Worse Still''': Natasha goes into NeverMyFault mode and feels that Susan, who she argued with is responsible for their loss.
* Team Logic members Melody and Helen firmly grasp the IdiotBall with the reinvestment task. Firstly, by adopting the strategy of selling to retailers directly instead of the public. They get a potential duvet order from a shop owner, but to get them, Helen must stop selling on the second day and go on a long journey across London.
** '''You'd Expect''': For both Helen and Melody to simply abandon this flawed strategy and for Helen to carry on selling the stock she has.\\
** '''Instead''': Melody tells Helen to buy the duvets, forcing Helen to go on a long car ride through London for the rest of the day.\\

to:

* In the tenth episode, both teams are given £250 of wholesale o items to sell to the public over two days, public, reinvesting in items that sell well. Lord Sugar makes it clear that any leftover stock is fine. Ventura elects Natasha to be their team leader, they reinvest heavily on day one and sell a lot of stock due to Jim, who phones asks Natasha and asks about reinvestment.\\
'''You'd Expect''': Natasha to remember the key goal of the task is to reinvest and any leftover stock is fine.reinvest.\\
'''Instead''': Natasha keeps on insisting that they've they have invested heavily on day one and need to shift the stock they have, Jim makes repeated requests to reinvest yet but Natasha only lets him invest £20 pounds.
** '''Result''': Lord Sugar is left furious when he discovers Natasha's refusal to reinvest and doesn't accept her excuse of having invested heavily on day one. Sugar accuses her of not having any courage and even though Ventura wins the task, he strips them of their reward because of Natasha's actions.reward.\\
'''Worse Still''': Natasha goes into NeverMyFault mode and feels that Susan, who she argued with is responsible for their the loss.
* Team Logic members Melody and Helen firmly grasp the IdiotBall with the reinvestment task. Firstly, task, by adopting the a strategy of selling to retailers directly instead of the public.directly. They get a potential duvet order from a shop owner, but to get them, Helen must stop selling on the second day and go on a long journey across London.
** '''You'd Expect''': For both Helen and Melody to simply abandon this flawed strategy and for Helen to carry on selling the stock she has.selling.\\
** '''Instead''': Melody tells Helen to buy the duvets, forcing Helen to go on a long car ride through London for the rest of the day.\\



* During the task Tom sells the stock Lord Sugar provides, he advises Melody that the stock of nodding dogs have sold very well.

to:

* During the task Tom sells the stock Lord Sugar provides, he advises Melody that the stock of nodding dogs have sold very well.



** '''Instead''': Melody completely disregards Tom's advice and buys a load of digital stock.\\
** '''Result''': Melody's purchases and strategy cause her team to lose and she is fired.
* In the twelfth episode, each team must invent a new fast-food outlet, Jim is Team Leader for Ventura and decides to create a Mexican themed restaurant. Natasha has boasted about having a degree in hospitality and Jim decides to have her handle the production of the food. However, Natasha says she can't cook and asks to be on the branding team, which has Susan who she does not get along with at all.\\
'''You'd Expect''': For Jim to force Natasha to go on the food production team as she is refusing to use her degree for the task. If not, then Jim can just take Susan with him to create the food for their restaurant as she recommended Mexican food and leave Natasha to do the branding alone to avoid any arguments.\\
'''Instead''': Jim leaves Susan and Natasha on the branding team and handles food production by himself. This ends up backfiring due to Susan and Natasha being unable to work together and constantly call Jim to act as peacemaker. Lord Sugar aide Karren notes that this was not a good decision as they're not using Natasha's skill set.\\
'''Result''': Ventura ends up losing the task due to providing a poor service and an embarrassing pitch in front of Lord Sugar and his industry expert who evaluate their concept. Jim is left under intense scrutiny and has Susan and Natasha gang up on him in the Boardroom. However, Lord Sugar ends up firing Natasha for not using her degree.

to:

** '''Instead''': Melody completely disregards ignores Tom's advice and buys a load of digital stock.items.\\
** '''Result''': Melody's purchases and strategy actions cause her team to lose and she is fired.
* In the twelfth episode, each team must invent a new fast-food outlet, Jim is Team Leader for Ventura and decides to create a Mexican themed restaurant. Natasha has boasted about having a degree in hospitality and Jim decides to have her handle the production of the food. However, Natasha says she can't cook and asks to be on the branding team, which has Susan who she does not get along with at all.with.\\
'''You'd Expect''': For Jim to force Natasha to go on the food production team as she is refusing to use her degree for the task. degree. If not, then Jim can just take Susan with him to create the food for their restaurant as she recommended Mexican food and leave Natasha to do the branding alone to avoid any arguments.\\
'''Instead''': Jim leaves Susan and Natasha on the branding team and handles food production by himself. This ends up backfiring due to Susan and Natasha being unable to work together and constantly call calling Jim to act as peacemaker. Lord Sugar aide Karren notes that this was not a good decision as they're not using Natasha's skill set.\\
'''Result''': Ventura ends up losing the task due to providing a poor service and an embarrassing pitch in front of Lord Sugar and his industry expert who evaluate their concept. Jim is left under intense scrutiny and has Susan and Natasha gang up on him in the Boardroom. However, Lord Sugar ends up firing fires Natasha for not using her degree.

Top