Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WebAnimation / HistoryMatters

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Several in "New Courland: When Latvia Built an Empire", including the very premise. For starters, Latvia did not exist in the 17th century, which the video acknowledges, but the other Latvian homelands of Vidzeme, Latgale, and Selija were also not part of the Duchy of Courland, so the video title is a bit of a stretch already. Additionally, while the majority native peasant population of the Duchy did indeed speak Latvian, most of the Courlander colonists who went to Tobago were of the Baltic German upper and noble classes who settled in Latvia during the crusades of the 14th century, and so even if the colony survived, its descendants wouldn't be Latvian speakers as the video suggests but more likely German or Dutch speaking. The only native Latvians brought along were indentured servants who either died in the collapse of the first settlement in 1639, were gradually assimilated into the Dutch or German majorities of the subsequent settlements, or on some rare occasions escaped to join the marauding Spanish and English buccaneers.
* ArtisticLicenseNuclearPhysics: In "How did the USSR get its nukes?", it is erroneously mentioned that the Soviet Union had no access to weapons-grade uranium (which the US and British Empire effectively had a monopoly on at that point) and thus had to "mine" plutonium in order to construct their nukes instead. In reality, Soviet Union did actually have access to uranium deposits within its borders, the issue was that they weren't able to enrich their uranium to weapons grade (a process requiring resources and money that the USSR was fresh out of because of the war) and thus converted it to plutonium in makeshift breeder reactors instead. Plutonium itself also cannot be "mined" as it is a byproduct of decaying uranium-238, meaning it only occurs naturally in extremely small concentrations.

to:

** Several in "New Courland: When Latvia Built an Empire", including the very premise. For starters, Latvia did not exist in the 17th century, which the video acknowledges, but the other Latvian homelands of Vidzeme, Latgale, and Selija were also not part of the Duchy of Courland, so the video title is a bit of a stretch already. Additionally, while the majority native peasant population of the Duchy did indeed speak Latvian, most of the Courlander colonists who went to Tobago were of the Baltic German upper and noble classes who settled in Latvia during the crusades of the 14th century, and so even if the colony survived, its descendants wouldn't be Latvian speakers as the video suggests but more likely German or Dutch speaking. The only native Latvians brought along were indentured servants who either died in the collapse of the first settlement in 1639, were gradually assimilated into the Dutch or German majorities of the subsequent settlements, or on some rare occasions escaped to join the marauding Spanish and English buccaneers.
* ArtisticLicenseNuclearPhysics: In "How did the USSR get its nukes?", it is erroneously mentioned that the Soviet Union had no access to weapons-grade uranium (which the US and British Empire Britain effectively had a monopoly on at that point) and thus had to "mine" plutonium in order to construct their nukes instead. In reality, Soviet Union did actually have access to uranium deposits within its borders, the issue was that they weren't able to enrich their uranium to weapons grade (a process requiring resources and money that the USSR was fresh out of because of the war) and thus converted it to plutonium in makeshift breeder reactors instead. Plutonium itself also cannot be "mined" as it is a byproduct of decaying uranium-238, meaning it only occurs naturally in extremely small concentrations.



* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its described how most European Powers, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, simply paid off the Barbary Coast pirates exorbitantly since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying them off was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed to pay the Barbary States a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement.[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping [[/note]] For the second war, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. This time, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing except their capital ''not'' being burned).

to:

* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its described how most European Powers, nations, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, France and Spain simply paid off the Barbary Coast pirates exorbitantly since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying them off was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed to pay the Barbary States a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement.[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping shipping [[/note]] For the second war, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. This time, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing except their capital ''not'' being burned).



* BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor: In "Why did Britain lose Hanover?", it was noted that once the House of Hanover was granted the British crown in 1713, the Elector of Hanover at the time, George I, immediately moved to Britain. His successors would remain there as well--to the point where George III, despite ruling both Britain and Hanover for ''nearly 60 years'', never visited Hanover during his lifetime--leading to a growing alienation where Hanover felt they had become a British puppet state. This was amplified after the Napoleonic Wars, when the re-established ''Kingdom'' of Hanover flat-out didn't want the British king back. When William IV died without an heir in 1837, this gave them an out: while Victoria became Queen of the United Kingdom, Salic law disallowed women from rule, so Hanover was taken over by her uncle, Ernest Augustus. But their independence from the UK only lasted 29 years before they were conquered by Prussia.

to:

* BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor: In "Why did Britain lose Hanover?", it was noted that once the House of Hanover was granted ascended to the British crown Crown in 1713, the Elector of Hanover at the time, George I, immediately moved to Britain. England. His successors would remain there as well--to the point where George III, despite ruling being the ruler of both Britain and Hanover for ''nearly 60 years'', never visited Hanover during his lifetime--leading to a growing alienation where between Hanover felt they had become a British puppet state. and Britain. This was amplified after the Napoleonic Wars, when the re-established ''Kingdom'' "Kingdom'' of Hanover flat-out didn't want made efforts to distance themselves from the British king back.British. When William IV died without an heir in 1837, this gave them an out: while Victoria became Queen of the United Kingdom, Salic law disallowed women from rule, so Hanover was taken over by her uncle, Ernest Augustus. But their independence from the UK status as an independent nation only lasted 29 years before they were conquered absorbed by Prussia.



* BondVillainStupidity: In "Why Didn't Britain Make Peace After the Fall of France?", it's noted that Britain's strategy for World War II was to hold out until Germany made a mistake, or something happened that would pull the United States into the fight. Their code breakers already knew Hitler was keen on stabbing Stalin in the back, and they predicted this would happen by 1942. Fortunately for them, Germany opened a two-front war by invading the Soviet Union in July 1941, and Japan pulled the US into the fray by attacking Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, in December 1941. Even so, the United States didn't join the European war until Germany declared war on the USA, [[NiceJobFixingItVillain despite their treaty with Japan including no obligation to do so.]]
* BothSidesHaveAPoint: In "Was the Glorious Revolution a Dutch Conquest?", the British saw the Revolution as a coup to overthrow a tyrannical king and crown a constitutional monarch that would respect Parliament while the Dutch saw it as that one time they conquered Britain and Ireland and made their leader, William of Orange, its new King. The narrator concludes both sides were right as it was both a coup and conquest that benefited both sides.

to:

* BondVillainStupidity: In "Why Didn't Britain Make Peace After the Fall of France?", it's noted that Britain's strategy for in World War II was to hold out until Germany made a mistake, or something happened that would pull the United States into the fight. Their British code breakers already knew Hitler was keen on stabbing Stalin in the back, and they predicted this would happen by 1942. Fortunately for them, Germany opened a two-front war by invading the Soviet Union in July 1941, and Japan pulled the US into the fray by attacking Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, in December 1941. Even so, the United States didn't join the European war until Germany declared war on the USA, [[NiceJobFixingItVillain despite their treaty with Japan including no obligation to do so.]]
* BothSidesHaveAPoint: In "Was the Glorious Revolution a Dutch Conquest?", the British English saw the Revolution as a coup to overthrow a tyrannical king and crown enthrone a constitutional monarch that would respect Parliament Parliament, while the Dutch saw it as a military conquest of the British Isles that one time they conquered Britain and Ireland and made their leader, William of Orange, its the new King.king of the region. The narrator concludes both sides were right as it was both a coup and conquest that benefited both sides.



** The British government punished the Scottish Highland Clans who refused to swear loyalty to the House of Orange and their successors and we're involved in the Jacobite Rebellions by evicting them from their lands and giving them to loyal Scottish nobles who turn those lands into Sheep Farms. The Scottish Sheep farms ended up as a commercial failure no thanks to competition by New Zealand Sheep Farmers, the descendants of the exiled Scottish Clans.

to:

** The British government punished Wealthy landowners in the Scottish Highland Clans who refused to swear loyalty to the House of Orange and their successors and we're involved in the Jacobite Rebellions by Highlands began evicting them from their lands tenants and giving resettling them near the coast in the 18th and the 19th centuries as part of what came to loyal Scottish nobles who turn those lands into Sheep Farms. be known as the "Highland Clearances". The Scottish Sheep landowners quickly established massive sheep farms on the cleared land, which eventually ended up as a commercial failure no thanks due to the fact that many of the displaced tenants travelled to New Zealand and established sheep farms of their own; the competition by New Zealand Sheep Farmers, between the descendants of two ended badly for the exiled Scottish Clans.landowners.



** The Scottish Highland Clans remain loyal to House of Stuart despite being overthrown by the House of Orange and their successors which many people in the United Kingdom accepted as their new monarch. The Clans' refusal to swear allegiance to the new King and taking part in the Jacobite Rebellions led to the British government to kick the Highland Clans out of their lands and give them to loyal Scottish Lords.

to:

** The Many clans in the Scottish Highland Clans remain Highlands remained loyal to the House of Stuart despite being overthrown even after it was replaced by the House of Orange and their successors which many people in then the United Kingdom accepted as their new monarch. The Clans' House of Hanover. Their refusal to swear abandon their allegiance to the new King and taking part House of Stuart led to repeated government persecution from the 1690's until the 1740's, culminating in bloody reprisals after the failure of the Jacobite Rebellions led to the British government to kick the Highland Clans out rising of their lands and give them to loyal Scottish Lords.1745.



** The Scottish Highland Clans remaining loyal to the disposed House Stuart and taking part in the Jacobite rebellions were punished by British government by having the Clans evicted from their lands and given to loyal Scottish nobles.

to:

** The Those clans in the Scottish Highland Clans remaining Highlands who remained loyal to the disposed deposed House of Stuart and taking part in the Jacobite rebellions were punished by British the Hanoverian government by having the Clans evicted from elements of their lands culture such as kilts and given to loyal Scottish nobles.Highland weapons banned for decades.



** Despite being known for most of its history as Persia, the country's actual name is Iran and they always called it as such. The misnaming come from the Greeks who named it after their elite class the Farsis, and the name practically stuck. It wouldn't be until the 20th Century when the Shah of Iran requested the world community to refer to their country as Iran rather than Persia and pretty much everyone accepted... with the exception of Great Britain because old habits die hard.

to:

** Despite being known for most of its history as Persia, the country's actual name is Iran and they always called it as such. The misnaming come from the Greeks who named it after their elite class the Farsis, and the name practically stuck. It wouldn't be until the 20th Century when the Shah of Iran requested the world community to refer to their country as Iran rather than Persia and pretty much everyone accepted... with the exception of Great Britain because old habits die hard.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** When Ceaușescu is giving his speech in front of an angry crowd in the Romanian Revolution video, one person's protest sign reads "[[VideoGame/{{Roblox}} Go commit die]]".

to:

** When Ceaușescu is giving his speech in front of an angry crowd in the Romanian Revolution video, one person's protest sign reads "[[VideoGame/{{Roblox}} "[[Platform/{{Roblox}} Go commit die]]".

Added: 326

Changed: 56

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Making matters worse for the Barbary States, the American Victory sent shockwaves across Europe. Seeing how a smaller, less-powerful state managed to defeat the Barbary States so thoroughly made the larger European Naval powers realize that they no longer had to deal with the Barbary pirates, and thus launched their own campaigns against them. [[ForWantOfANail This ultimately led]] to the French Occupation of Algeria in the 1830s.

to:

** Making matters worse for the Barbary States, the American Victory sent shockwaves across Europe. [[DidntSeeThatComing Seeing how a smaller, less-powerful state from the other side of the ocean managed to defeat the Barbary States so thoroughly thoroughly]] made the larger European Naval powers realize that they no longer had to deal with the Barbary pirates, and thus launched their own campaigns against them. [[ForWantOfANail This ultimately led]] to the French Occupation of Algeria in the 1830s.


Added DiffLines:

** In discussing the Nigerian Civil War, he describes how Britain aided the Nigerian government because since they previously controlled the region as a colony they were deeply concerned about their well being and-JUST KIDDING. Britain only cared for the nation’s oil and controlling it, which the government promised to them.

Added: 880

Changed: 570

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtShift: Starting in 2019, videos end with the credits having the background as a History Matters-style rendering of a famous work of art. Frequent ones include ''The Son of Man'' (regarded by fans to be the narrator's AuthorAvatar), ''American Gothic'', and ''Napoleon Crossing the Alps''. If it's about the USSR, and has mentions of [[UsefulNotes/JosefStalin Stalin]], it might show a photograph [[UnPerson getting airbrushed to remove someone standing with Stalin]]. [[spoiler:In at least one video, the airbrush was replaced with the Rover from ''Series/ThePrisoner1967''.]]

to:

* ArtShift: ArtShift:
**
Starting in 2019, videos end with the credits having the background as a History Matters-style rendering of a famous work of art. Frequent ones include ''The Son of Man'' (regarded by fans to be the narrator's AuthorAvatar), ''American Gothic'', and ''Napoleon Crossing the Alps''. If it's about the USSR, and has mentions of [[UsefulNotes/JosefStalin Stalin]], it might show a photograph [[UnPerson getting airbrushed to remove someone standing with Stalin]]. [[spoiler:In at least one video, the airbrush was replaced with the Rover from ''Series/ThePrisoner1967''.]]
** 2023 saw HM throw more detail into their style without fundamentally changing it. A good comparison would be comparing figures from the English and British Series in 2017-18 to a video made in 2023 about [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbCp1C1n_Pk Britain's continued ownership of the Channel Islands.
]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A newspaper dated July 27th, 1945 in "Why was Churchill voted out of office after WW2?" has a headline "Bright flash in Nevada is 'Nothing, stop asking'", an obvious reference to the first atomic bomb test. While the vast majority of atomic bomb tests in the US did take place in Nevada, the Trinity Test was in New Mexico.

to:

** A newspaper dated July 27th, 1945 in "Why was Churchill voted out of office after WW2?" [=WW2=]?" has a headline "Bright flash in Nevada is 'Nothing, stop asking'", an obvious reference to the first atomic bomb test. While the vast majority of atomic bomb tests in the US did take place in Nevada, the Trinity Test was in New Mexico.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its described how most European Powers, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, simply paid off the Barbary Coast pirates exorbitantly since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying them off was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed to pay the Barbary States a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement.[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping [[/note]] This time, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. In the second war, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing except their capital ''not'' being burned).

to:

* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its described how most European Powers, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, simply paid off the Barbary Coast pirates exorbitantly since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying them off was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed to pay the Barbary States a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement.[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping [[/note]] This time, For the second war, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. In the second war, This time, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing except their capital ''not'' being burned).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its noted that most European Powers, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, simply paid off the Barbary Coast pirates exorbitantly since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying them off was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed to pay the Barbary States a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement.[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping [[/note]] This time, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. In the second war, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing except their capital ''not'' being burned).

to:

* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its noted that described how most European Powers, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, simply paid off the Barbary Coast pirates exorbitantly since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying them off was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed to pay the Barbary States a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement.[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping [[/note]] This time, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. In the second war, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing except their capital ''not'' being burned).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its noted that most European Powers, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, simply paid off the Barbary Coast pirates exorbitantly since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying them off was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed with the Barbary States for a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement.[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping [[/note]] This time, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. In the second war, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing except their capital ''not'' being burned).

to:

* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its noted that most European Powers, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, simply paid off the Barbary Coast pirates exorbitantly since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying them off was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed with to pay the Barbary States for a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement.[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping [[/note]] This time, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. In the second war, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing except their capital ''not'' being burned).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its noted that most European Powers, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, simply paid off the pirates exorbitantly on the Barbary Coast since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying off the pirates was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed with the Barbary States for a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping [[/note]]. This time, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. This time, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing but their capital ''not'' being burned).

to:

* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its noted that most European Powers, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, simply paid off the Barbary Coast pirates exorbitantly on the Barbary Coast since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying them off the pirates was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed with the Barbary States for a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement[[note]] agreement.[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping [[/note]]. [[/note]] This time, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. This time, In the second war, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing but except their capital ''not'' being burned).

Added: 1642

Changed: 22

Removed: 1641

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its noted that most European Powers, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, simply paid off the pirates exorbitantly on the Barbary Coast since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying off the pirates was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed with the Barbary States for a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping [[/note]]. This time, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. This time, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing but their capital ''not'' being burned).
** Making matters worse for the Barbary States, the American Victory sent shockwaves across Europe. Seeing how a smaller, less-powerful state managed to defeat the Barbary States so thoroughly made the larger European Naval powers realize that they no longer had to deal with the Barbary pirates, and thus launched their own campaigns against them. [[ForWantOfANail This ultimately led]] to the French Occupation of Algeria in the 1830s.



** In the video discussing the Romanian Revolution of 1989, the narrator describes how a KangarooCourt found CeauČ™escu and his wife guilty, and they were to spend the rest of their lives in custody… which was literally just 5 minutes since the court sentenced them to be executed, carried out immediately.
* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its noted that most European Powers, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, simply paid off the pirates exorbitantly on the Barbary Coast since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying off the pirates was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed with the Barbary States for a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping [[/note]]. This time, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. This time, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing but their capital ''not'' being burned).
** Making matters worse for the Barbary States, the American Victory sent shockwaves across Europe. Seeing how a smaller, less-powerful state managed to defeat the Barbary States so thoroughly made the larger European Naval powers realize that they no longer had to deal with the Barbary pirates, and thus launched their own campaigns against them. [[ForWantOfANail This ultimately led]] to the French Occupation of Algeria in the 1830s.

to:

** In the video discussing the Romanian Revolution of 1989, the narrator describes how a KangarooCourt found Romanian Communist dictator CeauČ™escu and his wife guilty, and they were to spend the rest of their lives in custody… which was literally just 5 minutes since the court sentenced them to be executed, carried out immediately.
* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its noted that most European Powers, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, simply paid off the pirates exorbitantly on the Barbary Coast since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying off the pirates was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed with the Barbary States for a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping [[/note]]. This time, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. This time, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing but their capital ''not'' being burned).
** Making matters worse for the Barbary States, the American Victory sent shockwaves across Europe. Seeing how a smaller, less-powerful state managed to defeat the Barbary States so thoroughly made the larger European Naval powers realize that they no longer had to deal with the Barbary pirates, and thus launched their own campaigns against them. [[ForWantOfANail This ultimately led]] to the French Occupation of Algeria in the 1830s.
immediately.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AwakeningTheSleepingGiant: In "Why was the USA the first to deal with the Barbary Pirates?", its noted that most European Powers, particularly larger ones like Britain, France, & Spain, simply paid off the pirates exorbitantly on the Barbary Coast since it was less costly than waging war against them. However, for the newly-formed United States, the Barbary pirates were attacking their shipping and the cost of paying off the pirates was still too high, so they opted to wage war. The first war was a narrow victory for the US, who agreed with the Barbary States for a large tribute in exchange for releasing American Prisoners and for safe passage for their ships. Of course, being pirates, the Barbary States later reneged on their agreement[[note]] Mainly because during the War of 1812 the British convinced them to step-up their attacks on American Shipping [[/note]]. This time, the US decided to deal with the Barbary Pirates for good. This time, they sent even more ships and [[CurbStompBattle defeated the Barbary states so thoroughly]] that they had no choice but to agree to permanently stop all raids on American Shipping (in exchange for nothing but their capital ''not'' being burned).
** Making matters worse for the Barbary States, the American Victory sent shockwaves across Europe. Seeing how a smaller, less-powerful state managed to defeat the Barbary States so thoroughly made the larger European Naval powers realize that they no longer had to deal with the Barbary pirates, and thus launched their own campaigns against them. [[ForWantOfANail This ultimately led]] to the French Occupation of Algeria in the 1830s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WhyDontYouJustShootHim: [[https://youtu.be/T9VqAjLhT4Y?si=59Gr8RLqOvclhyAY “Why was Napoleon exiled instead of being executed?”]] went into detail about how the various Coalition powers wanted to deal with Napoleon, and why. Many saw executing Napoleon as a bad idea, since his rule was initially legitimized by the blessing of the Pope. Additionally, some, particularly the United Kingdom, figured that executing him would make him a martyr, and destabilize the restored Bourbon monarchy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** "How did Europe React to the Fall of Constantinople" describes the Pope calling for a crusade by showing Nicholas V in a sleeveless dress in front of the ''Series/WheelOfFortune'' board displaying D_US _ULT.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** "...these lands."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheStinger: Sometimes used in videos. For instance "Did Pepsi Really Own the Sixth Largest Navy in the World?" (about an UrbanLegend that the USSR paid Pepsi in decommissioned warships because the Ruble couldn't be converted to foreign currency) ends with "It's all fun and games until Coke gets an aircraft carrier".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In "Why was Kazakhstan the last to leave the USSR?" the Byelorussian flag has an alien from ''VideoGame/SpaceInvaders'' within the decorative pattern along one edge.

Added: 441

Changed: 4

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ComicallyCrossedEyes: When a country is doing something stupid, their leader is sometimes depicted as having these.

to:

* ComicallyCrossedEyes: ComicallyCrossEyed: When a country is doing something stupid, their leader is sometimes depicted as having these.


Added DiffLines:

** "Why wasn't France carved up when Napoleon was defeated?" references the victorious coalition splitting into two 'camps' i.e. those who wanted France to lose territory and those who didn't. A literal camp is shown, with [[Franchise/FridayThe13th Jason Voorhees]] standing up in the background.
** The video on the Anglo-German Naval Arms Race shows Admiral Jackie Fisher holding a sign reading [[TabletopGame/Warhammer40000 "More dakka."]]

Added: 117

Changed: 12

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ComicallyCrossedEyes: When a country is doing something stupid, their leader is sometimes depicted as having these.



** Any time a newspaper appears on screen, it's filled with silly articles along with the main headline.

to:

** Any time Often when a newspaper appears on screen, it's filled with silly articles along with the main headline.

Top