Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
The armour worn by Kang, as seen at the end of issue 3 bears several similarities (notably the faceplate and chest) to an Iron Man suit. Given that the original Ultimate Kang was Sue Storm, laying precedence to the concept that Ultimate Kang is someone other than Nathaniel Richards and the fact that the Starks seem to be morally opposed to the Maker, this indicates that Kang is either Howard, Tony or a descendent of theirs.
to:
The armour worn by Kang, as seen at the end of issue 3 bears several similarities (notably the faceplate and chest) to an Iron Man suit. Given that the original Ultimate Kang was Sue Storm, laying precedence to the concept that Ultimate Kang is someone other than Nathaniel Richards and the fact that the Starks seem to be morally opposed to the Maker, this indicates that Kang is either Howard, Tony or a descendent of theirs.theirs.
** [[spoiler: Issue 4 seems to all but confirm Kang is Future Tony with Tony taking up the name "Iron Lad" and beginning work on the Immortus engine, Kang's weirdly reverent opinion of Howard, and Howard's emotional reaction to Kang's face.]]
** [[spoiler: Issue 4 seems to all but confirm Kang is Future Tony with Tony taking up the name "Iron Lad" and beginning work on the Immortus engine, Kang's weirdly reverent opinion of Howard, and Howard's emotional reaction to Kang's face.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
WMG is spoilers off
Changed line(s) 1,3 (click to see context) from:
[[WMG: [[spoiler:Kang]] is a Stark]]
The armour worn by [[spoiler:Kang]], as seen at the end of issue 3 bears several similarities (notably the faceplate and chest) to an Iron Man suit. Given that [[spoiler:the original Ultimate Kang was Sue Storm, laying precidence to the concept that Ultimate Kang is someone other than Nathaniel Richards]] and the fact that the Starks seem to be morally opposed to the Maker, this indicates that [[spoiler:Kang]] is either Howard, Tony or a descendent of theirs.
The armour worn by [[spoiler:Kang]], as seen at the end of issue 3 bears several similarities (notably the faceplate and chest) to an Iron Man suit. Given that [[spoiler:the original Ultimate Kang was Sue Storm, laying precidence to the concept that Ultimate Kang is someone other than Nathaniel Richards]] and the fact that the Starks seem to be morally opposed to the Maker, this indicates that [[spoiler:Kang]] is either Howard, Tony or a descendent of theirs.
to:
[[WMG: [[spoiler:Kang]] Kang is a Stark]]
The armour worn by[[spoiler:Kang]], Kang, as seen at the end of issue 3 bears several similarities (notably the faceplate and chest) to an Iron Man suit. Given that [[spoiler:the the original Ultimate Kang was Sue Storm, laying precidence precedence to the concept that Ultimate Kang is someone other than Nathaniel Richards]] Richards and the fact that the Starks seem to be morally opposed to the Maker, this indicates that [[spoiler:Kang]] Kang is either Howard, Tony or a descendent of theirs.
The armour worn by
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: [[spoiler:Kang]] is a Stark]]
The armour worn by [[spoiler:Kang]], as seen at the end of issue 3 bears several similarities (notably the faceplate and chest) to an Iron Man suit. Given that [[spoiler:the original Ultimate Kang was Sue Storm, laying precidence to the concept that Ultimate Kang is someone other than Nathaniel Richards]] and the fact that the Starks seem to be morally opposed to the Maker, this indicates that [[spoiler:Kang]] is either Howard, Tony or a descendent of theirs.
The armour worn by [[spoiler:Kang]], as seen at the end of issue 3 bears several similarities (notably the faceplate and chest) to an Iron Man suit. Given that [[spoiler:the original Ultimate Kang was Sue Storm, laying precidence to the concept that Ultimate Kang is someone other than Nathaniel Richards]] and the fact that the Starks seem to be morally opposed to the Maker, this indicates that [[spoiler:Kang]] is either Howard, Tony or a descendent of theirs.
