Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WMG / TheLoudHouseMovie

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG:There will be a movie where the Louds become superheroes.]]
* All the Louds, or at least the kids, somehow gain super powers. It's the second most shark-jumping idea after going to space and ''WesternAnimation/BigCityGreens'' is already doing that for its movie. Not to mention [[Recap/TheLoudHouseS6E18SpaceJammedCrownAndDirty Lisa has already been to space in the show]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* A {{Trumplica}}
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Lola? Also very likely. To say that Lincoln and Lola get into a lot of conflict would be an understatement. So it won't be too surprising for this movie to have Lincoln and Lola at each others' throats, only for the two to reconcile with each other in the end.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A Wrestling/BrockLesnar Expy
* A [[VideoGame/FinalFantasyVII Sephiroth Expy]] (albeit as a BadassNormal) who may or may not be related to Morag.

to:

* [[RunningGag A Wrestling/BrockLesnar Expy
Brock Lesnar Expy]]
* A [[VideoGame/FinalFantasyVII Sephiroth Expy]] Sephiroth]] Expy (albeit as a BadassNormal) who may or may not be related to Morag. Morag.
** The Expy in-question being [[BackFromTheDead Aggie.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* What about Lori? Well she’s not safe from any sibling conflict with Lincoln either. The movie could also focus on how Lincoln is fed up with Lori’s aggressive and bossy behavior towards him. With the latter telling Lincoln that she wished she never had a brother. As the two continue their conflict with each other, the movie will end with them reconciling and accepting each other’s differences.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG:The sequel will actually be rated by the Motion Picture Association and use the current Motion Picture Association logo instead of the old one.]]
* The film's credits featured the old MPA logo (complete with its production code number missing), likely since it didn't get a rating by the MPA. So the sequel can possibly fix this issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* My money's one Lynn, as he probably has the most difficult relationship with her. The movie will focus on how hard it is for Lincoln to put up with her obnoxious JerkJock behavior and aggressive roughhousing, leading to him telling her off and, in a moment of anger, declares that his life would be better off without her. This would lead to a fight between the two and the rest of the movie would be Lincoln and Lynn's slow recovery from it and in the end, they forgive each other and reaffirm their bond.

to:

* My money's one on Lynn, as he probably has the most difficult relationship with her. The movie will focus on how hard it is for Lincoln to put up with her obnoxious JerkJock behavior and aggressive roughhousing, leading to him telling her off and, in a moment of anger, declares that his life would be better off without her. This would lead to a fight between the two and the rest of the movie would be Lincoln and Lynn's slow recovery from it and in the end, they forgive each other and reaffirm their bond.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG:Since the first movie focused mostly on Lincoln's personal issues, the next movie will focus on his relastionship with one of his sisters.]]
* My money's one Lynn, as he probably has the most difficult relationship with her. The movie will focus on how hard it is for Lincoln to put up with her obnoxious JerkJock behavior and aggressive roughhousing, leading to him telling her off and, in a moment of anger, declares that his life would be better off without her. This would lead to a fight between the two and the rest of the movie would be Lincoln and Lynn's slow recovery from it and in the end, they forgive each other and reaffirm their bond.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the grand history of SliceOfLife animated sitcoms that get a BigDamnMovie (WesternAnimation/Recess, WesternAnimation/HeyArnold, WesternAnimation/TheProudFamily, etc.), we can probably expect the following plot points:

to:

* In the grand history of SliceOfLife animated sitcoms that get a BigDamnMovie (WesternAnimation/Recess, (WesternAnimation/{{Recess}}, WesternAnimation/HeyArnold, WesternAnimation/TheProudFamily, etc.), we can probably expect the following plot points:



* [[Film/TheMuppets A rich Texan man bent on buying Royal Woods for oil.]]

to:

* [[Film/TheMuppets [[Film/TheMuppets2011 A rich Texan man bent on buying Royal Woods for oil.]]



* A villain similar to [[Characters/{{DragonBallBroly}} Broly]], [[ComicBook/{{TheDeathOfSuperman}} Doomsday]] and [[ComicBook/{{SpiderMan}} Venom]] who is an older, stronger and eviler counterpart of Lincoln Loud. Complete with him being a Wrestler just like Wrestling/{{BrockLesnar}} (albeit with the Brock Expy appearing with the NoCelebritiesWereHarmed thingy, due to [[ScrewedByTheLawyers Copyright Reasons]]).

to:

* A villain similar to [[Characters/{{DragonBallBroly}} [[Characters/DragonBallBroly Broly]], [[ComicBook/{{TheDeathOfSuperman}} [[ComicBook/TheDeathOfSuperman Doomsday]] and [[ComicBook/{{SpiderMan}} [[ComicBook/SpiderMan Venom]] who is an older, stronger and eviler counterpart of Lincoln Loud. Complete with him being a Wrestler just like Wrestling/{{BrockLesnar}} Wrestling/BrockLesnar (albeit with the Brock Expy appearing with the NoCelebritiesWereHarmed thingy, due to [[ScrewedByTheLawyers Copyright Reasons]]).



[[WMG: If there's ever another massive multi-player crossover like VideoGame/{{Nicktoons Unite}}, that's not Nickelodeon All-Star Brawl, then Lincoln, Morag, and Loch Loud will be the Loud House representatives for Player Character, Villain, and Stage respectively.]]

to:

[[WMG: If there's ever another massive multi-player crossover like VideoGame/{{Nicktoons Unite}}, VideoGame/NicktoonsUnite, that's not Nickelodeon All-Star Brawl, then Lincoln, Morag, and Loch Loud will be the Loud House representatives for Player Character, Villain, and Stage respectively.]]



This one will involve a continuity reboot in which the Louds form a freelance crime-fighting group to fight Morag and other meances. Also, it will get a spin-off reusing the concept, with a {{Recycled Title}}.

to:

This one will involve a continuity reboot in which the Louds form a freelance crime-fighting group to fight Morag and other meances. Also, it will get a spin-off reusing the concept, with a {{Recycled Title}}.
RecycledTitle.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Up To Eleven is a defunct trope


* {{Evil Counterpart}}s of the Loud family. Essentially, each and everyone of the siblings' negative traits increased UpToEleven and none of their positive values.

to:

* {{Evil Counterpart}}s of the Loud family. Essentially, each and everyone of the siblings' negative traits increased UpToEleven up to eleven and none of their positive values.

Added: 259

Removed: 259

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: Morag had a Dark and Troubled Past]]
While most other past is unknown, besides being an ancestor to Aggie, Morag’s past was likely when she got [[AbusiveParents abused by her parents]], bullied by her siblings, and even laughed at by children in school.



[[WMG: Morag had a Dark and Troubled Past]]
While most other past is unknown, besides being an ancestor to Aggie, Morag’s past was likely when she got [[AbusiveParents abused by her parents]], bullied by her siblings, and even laughed at by children in school.

Added: 1239

Removed: 1201

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Switching them to Sequel Theories.


[[WMG: Morag had a Dark and Troubled Past]]
While most other past is unknown, besides being an ancestor to Aggie, Morag’s past was likely when she got [[AbusiveParents abused by her parents]], bullied by her siblings, and even laughed at by children in school.

[[WMG: There will be a possible potential second movie.]]
While it wasn't confirmed if they be any sequels, like [=SpongeBob=], they might be some plots that might happen in both sequels if the get announced.

The second film might focus on the Loud Sisters, where they try to save Lincoln after he gets kidnapped by a criminal.

[[WMG: There will be a possible potential third movie.]]
While it wasn't confirmed if they be any sequels, like [=SpongeBob=], they might be some plots that might happen in both sequels if the get announced.

The third film might focus on Lincoln, as a teenager who is in High School, that will get kidnapped by a supervillain.

[[WMG:There will be a fourth film, if the series manages to outlive [=SpongeBob=].]]

This one will involve a continuity reboot in which the Louds form a freelance crime-fighting group to fight Morag and other meances. Also, it will get a spin-off reusing the concept, with a {{Recycled Title}}.


Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

[[folder: Sequel theories]]

[[WMG: Morag had a Dark and Troubled Past]]
While most other past is unknown, besides being an ancestor to Aggie, Morag’s past was likely when she got [[AbusiveParents abused by her parents]], bullied by her siblings, and even laughed at by children in school.

[[WMG: There will be a possible potential second movie.]]
While it wasn't confirmed if they be any sequels, like [=SpongeBob=], they might be some plots that might happen in both sequels if the get announced.

The second film might focus on the Loud Sisters, where they try to save Lincoln after he gets kidnapped by a criminal.

[[WMG: There will be a possible potential third movie.]]
While it wasn't confirmed if they be any sequels, like [=SpongeBob=], they might be some plots that might happen in both sequels if the get announced.

The third film might focus on Lincoln, as a teenager who is in High School, that will get kidnapped by a supervillain.

[[WMG:There will be a fourth film, if the series manages to outlive [=SpongeBob=].]]

This one will involve a continuity reboot in which the Louds form a freelance crime-fighting group to fight Morag and other meances. Also, it will get a spin-off reusing the concept, with a {{Recycled Title}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The Present Louds are all directly descended from The Duke, hence bearing the family name (I know it's possible for husbands to take their wives names, but still) with the possible addition of the White Haired Family from Not A Loud via one of his later X# Great Grandchildren. While other families or characters, like the doppelgangers for example, are descended from The Duke's Sisters.

to:

NM: The Present Louds are all directly descended from The Duke, hence bearing the family name (I know it's possible for husbands to take their wives names, but still) with the possible addition of the White Haired Family from Not A Loud via one of his later X# Great Grandchildren. While other families or characters, like the doppelgangers for example, are descended from The Duke's Sisters.



** Family call one another whatever they want. If I recall right, don't some places use cousin as a term for close people? Even if Scotland isn't one of those places, the Louds have never been conventional by any means.

to:

** NM: Family call one another whatever they want. If I recall right, don't some places use cousin as a term for close people? Even if Scotland isn't one of those places, the Louds have never been conventional by any means.

Added: 219

Changed: 87

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** No your counterpoint is irrelevant, extended family still makes them Louds so that doesn’t undermine anything and multiple people can be descended from the same person and yet be distantly related enough from each other to be strangers. Also I never claimed the extended Louds died at sea, I just said that the could have shipwrecked on the coast of say Cape Cod and given how slow communications we’re back then anyone waiting for them in Scotland would eventually presume them dead even though they’re alive and well on another continent. Lastly there’s more to America than just Michigan, it’s a big place, the show never claimed Royal Woods to be 350-400 years old and it’s entirely possible subsequent generations of the Loch Louds and Extended Louds to have made their way west over time.
*** NM: I never said you did. If you ACTUALLY read my previous point then you would have seen that I was giving you a hypothetical example of how your attempt to include an extended family to the 1600 Louds would play out with the ridiculous "realistic" lense you tried to put the plot and mythos under. Speaking of which, YOU were the one to bring realism into this, so my prior counterpoint IS relevant. Also, you ARE aware that the director confirmed that the 1600 Louds did settle in Royal Woods when it was once called Woods and before it was renamed Royal Woods, right?
** NM: As for why Lucille referred to them as cousins in that one scene, and not descendant or similar terms. I imagine it was either more of a save time/convenience thing due to the situation, or a less cumbersome or clunky way to refer to them as family. (I imagine saying descendant or other such terms like 19th/20th Great Grandson/daughter would get pretty tiring or counterintuitive after a while.)

to:

*** No No, your counterpoint is irrelevant, extended family still makes them Louds so that doesn’t undermine anything and multiple people can be descended from the same person and yet be distantly related enough from each other to be strangers. Also I never claimed the extended Louds died at sea, I just said that the could have shipwrecked on the coast of say Cape Cod and given how slow communications we’re back then anyone waiting for them in Scotland would eventually presume them dead even though they’re alive and well on another continent. Lastly there’s more to America than just Michigan, it’s a big place, the show never claimed Royal Woods to be 350-400 years old and it’s entirely possible subsequent generations of the Loch Louds and Extended Louds to have made their way west over time.
*** NM: I never said you did. If you ACTUALLY read my previous point then you would have seen that I was giving you a hypothetical example of how your attempt to include an extended family to the 1600 Louds would play out with the ridiculous "realistic" lense you tried to put the plot and mythos under. Speaking of which, YOU were the one to bring realism into this, so my prior counterpoint IS relevant. Also, you ARE aware that the director confirmed that the 1600 Louds did settle in Royal Woods when it was once called Woods and before it was renamed Royal Woods, right?
right? [[https://mobile.twitter.com/ItsPharaohDk/status/1437402487330385922 Link.]]
** NM: As for why Lucille referred to them as cousins in that one scene, their scenes, and not descendant or similar terms. I imagine it was either more of a save time/convenience thing due to the situation, situation with Morag, or a less cumbersome or clunky way to refer to them as family. (I imagine saying descendant or other such terms like 19th/20th Great Grandson/daughter Grandson/daughter/nephew/niece would get pretty tiring or counterintuitive after a while.)



*** NM: Maybe, but it still stands and makes sense.

to:

*** **** NM: Maybe, but it still stands and makes sense.


Added DiffLines:

** Family call one another whatever they want. If I recall right, don't some places use cousin as a term for close people? Even if Scotland isn't one of those places, the Louds have never been conventional by any means.

Added: 576

Changed: 54

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** NM: What "makes more realistic sense" is irrelevant. The world and story say that they went to and settled in America. So, they went to and settled in America. The existence of an extended family not born of the 1700 Louds themselves completely erradicates and wreaks havoc on the story and plot, and only serves to make things more complicated than they need to be. Even the hypothetical existence of this family would only work under the "realistic" lense you just tried to put the movie and its mythos under. They went out to look for them, never even trying to take the throne, searched the Appalachia and died at sea. And again, that's only speaking hypothetically.

to:

*** NM: What "makes more realistic sense" is irrelevant. The world and story say that they went to and settled in America. So, they went to and settled in America. The existence of an extended family not born of the 1700 1600 Louds themselves completely erradicates and wreaks havoc on the story and plot, and only serves to make things more complicated than they need to be. Even the hypothetical existence of this family would only work under the "realistic" lense you just tried to put the movie and its mythos under. They went out to look for them, never even trying to take the throne, searched the Appalachia and died at sea. And again, that's only speaking hypothetically.



**** NM: I never said you did. If you ACTUALLY read my previous point then you would have seen that I was giving you a hypothetical example of how your attempt to include an extended family to the 1600 Louds would play out with the ridiculous "realistic" lense you tried to put the plot and mythos under. Speaking of which, YOU were the one to bring realism into this, so my prior counterpoint IS relevant. Also, you ARE aware that the director confirmed that the 1600 Louds did settle in Royal Woods when it was once called Woods and before it was renamed Royal Woods, right?




to:

**** NM: Maybe, but it still stands and makes sense.

Changed: 143

Removed: 143

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



:Lucille referred to Lucy as cousin not niece, which would have been the term used if her and the others were directly descended from the Duke.

to:

\n:Lucille *Lucille referred to Lucy as cousin not niece, which would have been the term used if her and the others were directly descended from the Duke.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

:Lucille referred to Lucy as cousin not niece, which would have been the term used if her and the others were directly descended from the Duke.

Added: 799

Changed: 46

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** No your counterpoint is irrelevant, extended family still makes them Louds so that doesn’t undermine anything and multiple people can be descended from the same person and yet be distantly related enough from each other to be strangers. Also I never claimed the extended Louds died at sea, I just said that the could have shipwrecked on the coast of say Cape Cod and given how slow communications we’re back then anyone waiting for them in Scotland would eventually presume them dead even though they’re alive and well on another continent. Lastly there’s more to America than just Michigan, it’s a big place, the show never claimed Royal Woods to be 350-400 years old and it’s entirely possible subsequent generations of the Loch Louds and Extended Louds to have made their way west over time.




to:

**** This gender thing is reading in too deep.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A [[VideoGame/MortalKombat Kano]] Expy, albeit as a BadassNormal

to:

* A [[VideoGame/MortalKombat [[Franchise/MortalKombat Kano]] Expy, albeit as a BadassNormal

Added: 675

Changed: 5

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** NM: Then they're STILL from Scotland, and have even LESS reason to NOT know their origins than they did originally! Also, where did the Royal Family go? Why didn't the two families ever meet up again if they both ended up in America? Communication issues or not, two clans so similar to each other WOULD spread quickly and attract the Royal Family's attention. Why didn't the Cousins go back to Scotland and tell the people after corroboration of how and why the banishment happened; effectively killing the story and series' events? Especially since I imagine the Royal Louds still had their ship. The whole "they appeared young as ghost" thing doesn't apply here, because the director outright [[https://mobile.twitter.com/ItsPharaohDk/status/1437402487330385922 confirmed]] that the Royal Family settled in what would become Royal Woods, and [[https://twitter.com/AnimationFan15/status/1437225217147879425 only appeared as such due to those forms being their most remembered appearances]]. You basically need to surgically attach a pretzel to the plot JUST to make this work! Yeah, WMG all for fun, but still!

to:

*** NM: Then they're STILL from Scotland, and have even LESS reason to NOT know their origins than they did originally! Also, where did the Royal Family go? Why didn't the two families ever meet up again if they both ended up in America? Communication issues or not, two clans so similar to each other WOULD spread quickly and attract the Royal Family's attention. Why didn't the Cousins go back to Scotland and tell the people after corroboration of how and why the banishment happened; effectively killing the story and series' events? Especially since I imagine the Royal Louds still had their ship. The whole "they appeared young as ghost" thing doesn't apply here, because the director outright [[https://mobile.twitter.com/ItsPharaohDk/status/1437402487330385922 confirmed]] that the Royal Family settled in what would become Royal Woods, and [[https://twitter.com/AnimationFan15/status/1437225217147879425 only appeared as such due to those forms being their most remembered appearances]]. You basically need to surgically attach a pretzel to the plot JUST to make this work! Yeah, WMG WMG, all for fun, but fun. But still!


Added DiffLines:

**** NM: What "makes more realistic sense" is irrelevant. The world and story say that they went to and settled in America. So, they went to and settled in America. The existence of an extended family not born of the 1700 Louds themselves completely erradicates and wreaks havoc on the story and plot, and only serves to make things more complicated than they need to be. Even the hypothetical existence of this family would only work under the "realistic" lense you just tried to put the movie and its mythos under. They went out to look for them, never even trying to take the throne, searched the Appalachia and died at sea. And again, that's only speaking hypothetically.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Again, 400 years is a long time. Also "they appeared young as ghost" doesn't apply here because them living to old age in the new world doesn't preclude extended family coming to look for them. Also it would have made more sense for the 17th century Louds to have settled in Appalachia because thats where the Scottish settled during the IRL colonial period and Michigan wasn't settled by Non-French Europeans until the 18th century.

to:

*** **** Again, 400 years is a long time. Also "they appeared young as ghost" doesn't apply here because them living to old age in the new world doesn't preclude extended family coming to look for them. Also it would have made more sense for the 17th century Louds to have settled in Appalachia because thats where the Scottish settled during the IRL colonial period and Michigan wasn't settled by Non-French Europeans until the 18th century.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Again, 400 years is a long time. Also "they appeared young as ghost" because them living to old age in the new world doesn't preclude extended family coming to look for them. Also it would have made more sense for the 17th century Louds to have settled in Appalachia because thats where the Scottish settled during the IRL colonial period and Michigan wasn't settled by Non-French Europeans until the 18th century.

to:

*** Again, 400 years is a long time. Also "they appeared young as ghost" doesn't apply here because them living to old age in the new world doesn't preclude extended family coming to look for them. Also it would have made more sense for the 17th century Louds to have settled in Appalachia because thats where the Scottish settled during the IRL colonial period and Michigan wasn't settled by Non-French Europeans until the 18th century.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

****Again, 400 years is a long time. Also "they appeared young as ghost" because them living to old age in the new world doesn't preclude extended family coming to look for them. Also it would have made more sense for the 17th century Louds to have settled in Appalachia because thats where the Scottish settled during the IRL colonial period and Michigan wasn't settled by Non-French Europeans until the 18th century.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** NM: Then they're STILL from Scotland, and have even LESS reason to NOT know their origins than they did originally! Also, where did the Royal Family go? Why didn't the two families ever meet up again if they both ended up in America? Communication issues or not, two clans so similar to each other WOULD spread quickly and attract the Royal Family's attention. Why didn't the Cousins go back to Scotland and tell the people after corroboration of how and why the banishment happened; effectively killing the story and series' events? Especially since I imagine the Royal Louds still had their ship. The whole "they appeared young as ghost" thing doesn't apply here, because the director outright [[https://mobile.twitter.com/ItsPharaohDk/status/1437402487330385922 confirmed]] that the Royal Family settled in what would become Royal Woods, and only appeared as such due to those forms being their most remembered appearances. You basically need to surgically attach a pretzel to the plot JUST to make this work! Yeah, WMG all for fun, but still!

to:

*** NM: Then they're STILL from Scotland, and have even LESS reason to NOT know their origins than they did originally! Also, where did the Royal Family go? Why didn't the two families ever meet up again if they both ended up in America? Communication issues or not, two clans so similar to each other WOULD spread quickly and attract the Royal Family's attention. Why didn't the Cousins go back to Scotland and tell the people after corroboration of how and why the banishment happened; effectively killing the story and series' events? Especially since I imagine the Royal Louds still had their ship. The whole "they appeared young as ghost" thing doesn't apply here, because the director outright [[https://mobile.twitter.com/ItsPharaohDk/status/1437402487330385922 confirmed]] that the Royal Family settled in what would become Royal Woods, and [[https://twitter.com/AnimationFan15/status/1437225217147879425 only appeared as such due to those forms being their most remembered appearances.appearances]]. You basically need to surgically attach a pretzel to the plot JUST to make this work! Yeah, WMG all for fun, but still!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** NM: Then they're STILL from Scotland, and have even LESS reason to NOT know their origins than they did originally! Also, where did the Royal Family go? Why didn't the two families ever meet up again if they both ended up in America? Communication issues or not, two clans so similar to each other WOULD spread quickly and attract the Royal Family's attention. Why didn't the Cousins go back to Scotland and tell the people after corroboration of how and why the banishment happened; effectively killing the story and series' events? Especially since I imagine the Royal Louds still had their ship. The whole "they appeared young as ghost" thing doesn't apply here, because the director outright confirmed that the Royal Family settled in what would become Royal Woods, and only appeared as such due to those forms being their most remembered appearances. You basically need to surgically attach a pretzel to the plot JUST to make this work! Yeah, WMG all for fun, but still!

to:

*** NM: Then they're STILL from Scotland, and have even LESS reason to NOT know their origins than they did originally! Also, where did the Royal Family go? Why didn't the two families ever meet up again if they both ended up in America? Communication issues or not, two clans so similar to each other WOULD spread quickly and attract the Royal Family's attention. Why didn't the Cousins go back to Scotland and tell the people after corroboration of how and why the banishment happened; effectively killing the story and series' events? Especially since I imagine the Royal Louds still had their ship. The whole "they appeared young as ghost" thing doesn't apply here, because the director outright confirmed [[https://mobile.twitter.com/ItsPharaohDk/status/1437402487330385922 confirmed]] that the Royal Family settled in what would become Royal Woods, and only appeared as such due to those forms being their most remembered appearances. You basically need to surgically attach a pretzel to the plot JUST to make this work! Yeah, WMG all for fun, but still!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[The Louds are like the Cahills from The 39 Clues: a large family that expanded into multiple branches.]]

to:

[[The [[WMG: The Louds are like the Cahills from The 39 Clues: a large family that expanded into multiple branches.]]]]

Added: 494

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG: The 1600s Loud Family are the direct ancestors of the doppelgängers from Fool Me Twice.]]

to:

[[WMG: The 1600s Loud Family are the direct ancestors of the doppelgängers doppelgangers from Fool Me Twice.]]


Added DiffLines:


[[The Louds are like the Cahills from The 39 Clues: a large family that expanded into multiple branches.]]
The Present Louds are all directly descended from The Duke, hence bearing the family name (I know it's possible for husbands to take their wives names, but still) with the possible addition of the White Haired Family from Not A Loud via one of his later X# Great Grandchildren. While other families or characters, like the doppelgangers for example, are descended from The Duke's Sisters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OP: Except the Louds are EXPLICITLY stated to be FROM Scotland, and that Lynn Sr outright DID NOT KNOW where his family was from; unlike Rita. It makes no sense for the 1600 Louds to have had American relatives, when that would directly contradict both of these points and make their confirmed immigration to America pointless. If this were the case, Lynn Sr would have said, "My family's from here too, but I think we had relatives in Scotland."

to:

* OP: NM: Except the Louds are EXPLICITLY stated to be FROM Scotland, and that Lynn Sr outright DID NOT KNOW where his family was from; unlike Rita. It makes no sense for the 1600 Louds to have had American relatives, when that would directly contradict both of these points and make their confirmed immigration to America pointless. If this were the case, Lynn Sr would have said, "My family's from here too, but I think we had relatives in Scotland."



*** OP: Then they're STILL from Scotland, and have even LESS reason to NOT know their origins than they did originally! Also, where did the Royal Family go? Why didn't the two families ever meet up again if they both ended up in America? Communication issues or not, two clans so similar to each other WOULD spread quickly and attract the Royal Family's attention. Why didn't the Cousins go back to Scotland and tell the people after corroboration of how and why the banishment happened; effectively killing the story and series' events? Especially since I imagine the Royal Louds still had their ship. The whole "they appeared young as ghost" thing doesn't apply here, because the director outright confirmed that the Royal Family settled in what would become Royal Woods, and only appeared as such due to those forms being their most remembered appearances. You basically need to surgically attach a pretzel to the plot JUST to make this work.
** OP: As for why Lucille referred to them as cousins in that one scene, and not descendant or similar terms. I imagine it was either more of a save time/convenience thing due to the situation, or a less cumbersome or clunky way to refer to them as family. (I imagine saying descendant or other such terms like 19th/20th Great Grandson/daughter would get pretty tiring or counterintuitive after a while.)

to:

*** OP: NM: Then they're STILL from Scotland, and have even LESS reason to NOT know their origins than they did originally! Also, where did the Royal Family go? Why didn't the two families ever meet up again if they both ended up in America? Communication issues or not, two clans so similar to each other WOULD spread quickly and attract the Royal Family's attention. Why didn't the Cousins go back to Scotland and tell the people after corroboration of how and why the banishment happened; effectively killing the story and series' events? Especially since I imagine the Royal Louds still had their ship. The whole "they appeared young as ghost" thing doesn't apply here, because the director outright confirmed that the Royal Family settled in what would become Royal Woods, and only appeared as such due to those forms being their most remembered appearances. You basically need to surgically attach a pretzel to the plot JUST to make this work.
work! Yeah, WMG all for fun, but still!
** OP: NM: As for why Lucille referred to them as cousins in that one scene, and not descendant or similar terms. I imagine it was either more of a save time/convenience thing due to the situation, or a less cumbersome or clunky way to refer to them as family. (I imagine saying descendant or other such terms like 19th/20th Great Grandson/daughter would get pretty tiring or counterintuitive after a while.)



*** OP: A gag in a serious scene crucial to the plot? I get what you're saying, and maybe done earlier would make sense, but still. Also, niece and nephew are gender specific terms, so using either would only be referring to either 11 or 2 people respectively. Unlike cousins or descendants, which are gender neutral and all encompassing. The former of which is only easier to use due to the shortness of it, and situation at hand. Whereas the latter is more of a mouthful to say repeatedly in quick succession, and more liable to waste precious seconds - however few that may be.

to:

*** OP: NM: A gag in a serious scene crucial to the plot? I get what you're saying, and maybe done earlier would make sense, but still. Also, niece and nephew are gender specific terms, so using either would only be referring to either 11 or 2 people respectively. Unlike cousins or descendants, which are gender neutral and all encompassing. The former of which is only easier to use due to the shortness of it, and situation at hand. Whereas the latter is more of a mouthful to say repeatedly in quick succession, and more liable to waste precious seconds - however few that may be.

Top