Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
It’s about a composer named Jason Robert Brown and his failed marriage with actress Theresa O’Neill. And then Cathy sues him for it.
to:
It’s about a composer named Jason Robert Brown and his failed marriage with actress Theresa O’Neill. His story is told normally while hers is told in reverse chronological order, with them being the only characters present, allowing the readers to piece together how their marriage came together and fell apart, and just who was at fault.
* And then Cathy sues him for it.
* And then Cathy sues him for it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
His messed-up childhood turned him into an adult with skewed ideas of how to treat women and a complex about his Jewish heritage.
to:
His messed-up childhood turned him into an adult with skewed ideas of how to treat women and a complex about his Jewish heritage.heritage.
[[WMG: Jamie decides to write about his marriage in his latest book.]]
It’s about a composer named Jason Robert Brown and his failed marriage with actress Theresa O’Neill. And then Cathy sues him for it.
[[WMG: Jamie decides to write about his marriage in his latest book.]]
It’s about a composer named Jason Robert Brown and his failed marriage with actress Theresa O’Neill. And then Cathy sues him for it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
Think about it: why else would the receptionist suddenly decide to only show up to work in her bra? Or why Cathy is ''in the room with Jamie'' as he sings "Nobody Needs to Know"?
to:
Think about it: why else would the receptionist suddenly decide to only show up to work in her bra? Or why Cathy is ''in the room with Jamie'' as he sings "Nobody Needs to Know"?Know"?
[[WMG: Jamie is the grown-up version of Jason from {{Theatre/Falsettos}}]]
His messed-up childhood turned him into an adult with skewed ideas of how to treat women and a complex about his Jewish heritage.
[[WMG: Jamie is the grown-up version of Jason from {{Theatre/Falsettos}}]]
His messed-up childhood turned him into an adult with skewed ideas of how to treat women and a complex about his Jewish heritage.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* Isn't it implied that the person he slept with is Elise his editor
to:
* Isn't it implied that the person he slept with is Elise his editoreditor
[[WMG: Film!Jamie's fame is causing him to hallucinate.]]
Think about it: why else would the receptionist suddenly decide to only show up to work in her bra? Or why Cathy is ''in the room with Jamie'' as he sings "Nobody Needs to Know"?
[[WMG: Film!Jamie's fame is causing him to hallucinate.]]
Think about it: why else would the receptionist suddenly decide to only show up to work in her bra? Or why Cathy is ''in the room with Jamie'' as he sings "Nobody Needs to Know"?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
** Isn't it implied that the person he slept with is Elise his editor
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
He only calls the person "kid".
to:
He only calls the person "kid"."kid".
**Isn't it implied that the person he slept with is Elise his editor
**Isn't it implied that the person he slept with is Elise his editor
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** I always assumed this is the interpretation you're supposed to take. Is there another one that's 'official'?
to:
** I always assumed this is the interpretation you're supposed to take. Is there another one that's 'official'?'official'?
[[WMG: Jamie is in bed with a man during "Nobody Needs to Know".]]
He only calls the person "kid".
[[WMG: Jamie is in bed with a man during "Nobody Needs to Know".]]
He only calls the person "kid".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Don\'t know if this is actually a WMG
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
The clock ''literally'' turned time back, and Schmuel became 41 years younger. He then proceeded to travel to Odessa and fall in love with a girl there.
to:
The clock ''literally'' turned time back, and Schmuel became 41 years younger. He then proceeded to travel to Odessa and fall in love with a girl there.there.
** I always assumed this is the interpretation you're supposed to take. Is there another one that's 'official'?
** I always assumed this is the interpretation you're supposed to take. Is there another one that's 'official'?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
The clock ''literally'' turned time back, and Schmuel became 41 years younger. He then proceeded to travel to Odessa and fell in love with a girl there.
to:
The clock ''literally'' turned time back, and Schmuel became 41 years younger. He then proceeded to travel to Odessa and fell fall in love with a girl there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
The clock ''literally'' turned the clock back, and Schmuel became 41 years younger. He then proceeded to travel to Odessa and fell in love with a girl there.
to:
The clock ''literally'' turned the clock time back, and Schmuel became 41 years younger. He then proceeded to travel to Odessa and fell in love with a girl there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[WMG: The two Schmuels in "The Schmuel Song" are the same person.]]
The clock ''literally'' turned the clock back, and Schmuel became 41 years younger. He then proceeded to travel to Odessa and fell in love with a girl there.
The clock ''literally'' turned the clock back, and Schmuel became 41 years younger. He then proceeded to travel to Odessa and fell in love with a girl there.
