Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WMG / HarryPotterAndTheDeathlyHallows

Go To

OR

Removed: 2553

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG:Death, from the Tale of the Three Brothers, is...]]
* Der Tod from {{Elisabeth}}. Death seems to be a {{trickster}} when he gives the deathly hallows to the Peverell brothers. He claims the lives of the older two brothers after they use their gifts foolishly. It sounds like something Der Tod would do.

[[WMG: Sirius isn't dead, but would be better off if he was. (He may also be [[TheGrimReaper Death...]] or ''a'' Death.)]]
When he fell through the curtain (in the book, anyway), he wasn't dead yet. Having passed into the land of death, he's become immortal; but he suffers constantly with an agony beyond a thousand deaths because physical bodies aren't made to cross over, just spirits. And he can never die. Ever. Like, ''ever'' ever, since the universe thinks he's already dead, and all three components of him (mind, body, and spirit/soul) are beyond the veil with all three still intact, and thus imbued with the power and eventually the attributes of death. It is for this reason that he may have become a death, or even, if he was the only one to cross the veil while no longer alive but not yet dead (going by the events of the movie), and considering that death is timeless, the Death shown in the tale of the three brothers. Aside from the total badassity of Sirius being the Death in the story, this leads to the next guess...

[[WMG: The core of the Elder Wand is a hair from the scalp of Death.]]
People assume that the Death in the tale of the three brothers was a skeleton, based on the most commonly used form in modern times as well as the skull in the drawing at the head of the chapter. This may be in error; Death is quite likely a relatively human-looking being. Wands typically have a core of something magical, typically a bit of a fantastic creature (hair, feather, heartstring). The book states that Death fashioned a wand from the branch of an elder tree; it doesn't say how, and no mention is made of the core. This not only allows any fatal spell to be blocked and fatal spells cast by the wand to have that extra "kick," but also means that the wielder carries death with him in a more literal way than the average mortal. Hence, why people with the Elder Wand tend to die gruesome
deaths even when they aren't being boastful about their super-fancy deathwand.
* {{Jossed}}. [[JKRowling JK Rowling]] said on her website that it was a Thestral hair, though if the below theory is correct, then this theory lives on to another day!

[[WMG: Death is a Thestral.]]
Or rather, all thestrals are literal personifications of Death.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG:Harry is killed soon after the epilogue]]
He has revealed to hundreds, if not thousands, of people that [[spoiler:he is master of the Elder Wand]]. He may be a powerful wizard, but he's not the most powerful.
** Harry put the wand back in Dumbledore's tomb, without telling anyone besides Ron and Hermione, after the battle. Why would someone go through all the trouble to kill him for something he doesn't have? [[ChaoticStupid Voldemort]] is dead by this point, and I would assume that other evil wizards would be a little better at their jobs than he was, for their sakes.
*** Unfortunately people would still go after him because they BELIEVE he has the elder wand.
**** Not only that, but WordOfGod has said that wands are semi-sentient, explaining how Harry's wand [[spoiler: defended him in the '7 Potters' battle at the beginning of the final book]]. The fact that Harry doesn't physically have the wand on him doesn't mean that he is not still [[spoiler: the master of the Elder wand]], if the wand recognizes him as such. The history of the wand shows that it has to be 'won', but [[spoiler: as we see from Snape's death, the common belief seems to be that you must defeat the master of the wand. Voldemort kills Snape because Snape killed Dumbledore, believing that made him the master of the wand, and Voldemort is very likely to be well-versed in this particular legend as he's trying quite hard to get hold of the wand.]] But Draco disarmed Dumbledore before Snape killed him, so the wand itself recognizes [[spoiler:Draco as its master, not Snape]], due to the semi-sentient state Rowling has given it and the particular criteria the wand itself uses, which do not seem to line up with the common belief about how the wand is won. It does make sense that power-hungry people who want the wand might believe Harry still has the wand and go after him for it.
**** It also seems that the wand doesn't need to be present in order for its allegiance to change. Draco becomes the wand's master by disarming Dumbledore from the Elder wand itself, but Harry becomes the master by disarming Draco from his own wand. This means that the wand recognizes the first duel defeat as the moment ownership shifts, regardless of whether it is the wand being used by the current master at the time. Therefore, if Harry is later defeated even though he is not using the wand, the victor will still become the master of the Elder wand. There are probably a lot of methods possible to reunite a wizard with his or her lost wand, as it is the most important tool for a magical person and there have probably been countless retrieval methods developed throughout history. Once a person becomes the master they could probably find the wand. So it would make sense for people to come after or try to kill Harry even though the wand isn't on him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also none of this reasoning is consistent with [[spoiler: Harry telling Dumbledore's portrait that "As long as I die a natural death, the wand's power dies with me"]]; after all the number of scenarios where the wand could possibly switch masters is endless. One of Harry's spoiler:kids could playfully disarm him, or a muggle could steal his wand, etc, without the Elder Wand ever [[spoiler: leaving Dumbledore's grave]].

to:

** Also none of this reasoning is consistent with [[spoiler: Harry telling Dumbledore's portrait that "As long as I die a natural death, the wand's power dies with me"]]; after all the number of scenarios where the wand could possibly switch masters is endless. One of Harry's spoiler:kids [[spoiler:kids]] could playfully disarm him, or a muggle could steal his wand, etc, without the Elder Wand ever [[spoiler: leaving Dumbledore's grave]].
** I would like to point out that being a Gryffindor does not necessarily get you the sword, acts of valor do.



Well, we already know he inherited his mothers metamorphegus abilities, despite the fact that such powers are supposed to be very rare and only show up every few generations or so. Lupin had a feeling that his son would be "like him" (a werewolf). The combination of shape-shifting genes from both parents increased his odds of having shape shifting abilities. He would up with both, due to the {{Rule of Cool}}.

to:

Well, we already know he inherited his mothers metamorphegus abilities, despite the fact that such powers are supposed to be very rare and only show up every few generations or so. Lupin had a feeling that his son would be "like him" (a werewolf). The combination of shape-shifting genes from both parents increased his odds of having shape shifting abilities. He would end up with both, due to the {{Rule of Cool}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG:Death, from the Tale of the Three Brothers, is Der Tod from {{Elisabeth}}.]]
Death seems to be a {{trickster}} when he gives the deathly hallows to the Peverell brothers. He claims the lives of the older two brothers after they use their gifts foolishly. It sounds like something Der Tod would do.

to:

[[WMG:Death, from the Tale of the Three Brothers, is Der Tod from {{Elisabeth}}.is...]]
*Der Tod from {{Elisabeth}}. Death seems to be a {{trickster}} when he gives the deathly hallows to the Peverell brothers. He claims the lives of the older two brothers after they use their gifts foolishly. It sounds like something Der Tod would do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Or'', he's been living on the run for months on end and cutting his hair hasn't really been in his top priorities. Crazy theory, I know. (Also, in response to above, [[Spoiler: Snape]] wasn't dead yet when Harry's shoulder length hair is discussed. And Harry still thinks he's an evil SOB at that point, too.

to:

* ''Or'', he's been living on the run for months on end and cutting his hair hasn't really been in his top priorities. Crazy theory, I know. (Also, in response to above, [[Spoiler: Snape]] [[spoiler:Snape]] wasn't dead yet when Harry's shoulder length hair is discussed. And Harry still thinks he's an evil SOB at that point, too.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Yes. Having hair "down to your shoulders" is not how you discribe a mullet.

to:

** Yes. Having hair "down to your shoulders" is not how you discribe describe a mullet.




to:

* ''Or'', he's been living on the run for months on end and cutting his hair hasn't really been in his top priorities. Crazy theory, I know. (Also, in response to above, [[Spoiler: Snape]] wasn't dead yet when Harry's shoulder length hair is discussed. And Harry still thinks he's an evil SOB at that point, too.

Added: 835

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** This troper wrote the "Lily is Crookshanks" [[PoesLaw as satire on the Lily=Hedwig theories]], and had no idea that anybody already [[PoesLaw seriously]] believed it. I would have thought that if using the word "obviously" in a PotHole to EpilepticTrees didn't get the point across, the point would have been gotten by the book on cat sexing.



Well, we already know he inherited his mothers metamorphegus abilities, despite the fact that such powers are supposed to be very rare and only show up every few generations or so. Lupin had a feeling that his son would be "like him" (a werewolf). The combination of shape-shifting genes from both parents increased his odds of having shape shifting abilities. He would up with both, due to the {{Rule of Cool}}.

to:

Well, we already know he inherited his mothers metamorphegus abilities, despite the fact that such powers are supposed to be very rare and only show up every few generations or so. Lupin had a feeling that his son would be "like him" (a werewolf). The combination of shape-shifting genes from both parents increased his odds of having shape shifting abilities. He would up with both, due to the {{Rule of Cool}}. Cool}}.

[[WMG: Ted Remus Lupin is capable of reforming his entire head more or less into a wolf's, along with the typical slight changes available to a metamorphmagus.]]
The same as the above guess, with even more RuleOfCool applied. [[strike: [[EpilepticTrees And when he died in battle toward the end of his prime adulthood, he was sent to]] [[{{Bleach}} the Soul Society]]]].[[supersecretspoiler: [[hottip:*: WMG's Authors Note: Seriously, no. Werehead ability, maybe. Bleach crossover, no.]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* And remember, Sirius is constantly mistaken for the Grim in the early books- an omen which heralds death.

Added: 245

Changed: 78

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


People assume that the Death in the tale of the three brothers was a skeleton, based on the most commonly used form in modern times as well as the skull in the drawing at the head of the chapter. This may be in error; Death is quite likely a relatively human-looking being. Wands typically have a core of something magical, typically a bit of a fantastic creature (hair, feather, heartstring). The book states that Death fashioned a wand from the branch of an elder tree; it doesn't say how, and no mention is made of the core. This not only allows any fatal spell to be blocked and fatal spells cast by the wand to have that extra "kick," but also means that the wielder carries death with him in a more literal way than the average mortal. Hence, why people with the Elder Wand tend to die gruesome deaths even when they aren't being boastful about their super-fancy deathwand.

to:

People assume that the Death in the tale of the three brothers was a skeleton, based on the most commonly used form in modern times as well as the skull in the drawing at the head of the chapter. This may be in error; Death is quite likely a relatively human-looking being. Wands typically have a core of something magical, typically a bit of a fantastic creature (hair, feather, heartstring). The book states that Death fashioned a wand from the branch of an elder tree; it doesn't say how, and no mention is made of the core. This not only allows any fatal spell to be blocked and fatal spells cast by the wand to have that extra "kick," but also means that the wielder carries death with him in a more literal way than the average mortal. Hence, why people with the Elder Wand tend to die gruesome gruesome
deaths even when they aren't being boastful about their super-fancy deathwand.deathwand.
*{{Jossed}}. [[JKRowling JK Rowling]] said on her website that it was a Thestral hair, though if the below theory is correct, then this theory lives on to another day!

Added: 62

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


**** This troper firmly believes the following- Lily ''did'' sacrifice herself, meant to die in place of harry, and so on and so on. ''But'' fate/Death/God/Saint Peter or whoever offers her soul/spirit a choice- she can watch from above/the afterlife, or she can spend a few years as, say, Crookshanks. When the cat dies, she will return to her dead human spirit state. kinda like Zee's grandma in The Shadow Thieves. alternatively, the choice giver uses a good form of the horcrux spell to allow part of her soul to remain alive, in the form of Crookshanks, and the other to go to heaven/the afterlife, until the cat dies and her soul spirit is reunited.

to:

**** This troper firmly believes the following- Lily ''did'' sacrifice herself, meant to die in place of harry, and so on and so on. ''But'' fate/Death/God/Saint Peter or whoever offers her soul/spirit a choice- she can watch from above/the afterlife, or she can spend a few years as, say, Crookshanks. When the cat dies, she will return to her dead human spirit state. kinda like Zee's grandma in The Shadow Thieves. alternatively, the choice giver uses a good form of the horcrux spell to allow part of her soul to remain alive, in the form of Crookshanks, and the other to go to heaven/the afterlife, until the cat dies and her soul spirit is reunited. reunited.
*** [[{{headdesk}} *bang* *bang* *bang* *bang* *bang* *bang*]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: Teddy Lupin, under the light of the full moon, will morph into a wolf, but will have fur of any wacky color of his choosing.]]
Well, we already know he inherited his mothers metamorphegus abilities, despite the fact that such powers are supposed to be very rare and only show up every few generations or so. Lupin had a feeling that his son would be "like him" (a werewolf). The combination of shape-shifting genes from both parents increased his odds of having shape shifting abilities. He would up with both, due to the {{Rule of Cool}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Also none of this reasoning is consistent with [[spoiler: Harry telling Dumbledore's portrait that "As long as I die a natural death, the wand's power dies with me"]]; after all the number of scenarios where the wand could possibly switch masters is endless. One of Harry's spoiler:kids could playfully disarm him, or a muggle could steal his wand, etc, without the Elder Wand ever [[spoiler: leaving Dumbledore's grave]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** The point was, there was a lot of confusion with that, and [[DeathOfTheAuthor even with]] WordOfGod the subject is a [[BrokenBase Base Breaker]]. The premise of the guess follows the beliefs of the group who believes Snape was at one point the master to its logical conclusion. And the guess ''specifically'' stated that it never specified that the wand's master had to be human. The ability to speak CanisLatinicus follows from having human-like vocal abilities.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** This troper firmly believes the following- Lily ''did'' sacrifice herself, meant to die in place of harry, and so on and so on. ''But'' fate/Death/God/Saint Peter or whoever offers her soul/spirit a choice- she can watch from above/the afterlife, or she can spend a few years as, say, Crookshanks. When the cat dies, she will return to her dead human spirit state. kinda like Zee's grandma in The Shadow Thieves. alternatively, the choice giver uses a good form of the horcrux spell to allow part of her soul to remain alive, in the form of Crookshanks, and the other to go to heaven/the afterlife, until the cat dies and her soul spirit is reunited.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Um... The book very clearly explained how the Elder Wand changes masters. [[YourMileageMayVary At least, it was pretty clear to me]]. In case it wasn't, here it is: In order for the Elder Wand to recognize a new master, its current master must be defeated, but "defeated" does ''not'' mean "killed". It could mean something as simple as Disarming, as [[spoiler: Harry]] did to the real master of the Elder Wand as of the end of HalfBloodPrince, [[spoiler: Draco Malfoy]] (also: the master doesn't have to be using the Elder Wand for it to be defeated); also, it can't be handed over or forfeited to a new master. So there's the first link in the progression broken: Snape was never the master of the Elder Wand, because [[spoiler: he killed Dumbledore as per a prior agreement; Dumbledore more or less forfeited his mastery of the wand to Draco]]. The second link in the chain has a very low probability of being able to mutter an incantation (she'd have to hold the wand in her mouth, and proper word choice and pronunciation is kind of a big deal in the Potterverse), and she never defeated any of the wand's true masters. Neville, while [[TookALevelInBadass taking a level in badass]], ''also'' never defeated any of the wand's masters, but hey, come on. He ended up being master of a big fucking sword that can only be mastered by a true Gryffindor; he's no less {{badass}} for not being a master of the Elder Wand (which, as [[spoiler: Harry]] pointed out later, is a lot more hassle than most people want to deal with).

to:

* Um... The book very clearly explained how the Elder Wand changes masters. [[YourMileageMayVary At least, it was pretty clear to me]]. In case it wasn't, here it is: In order for the Elder Wand to recognize a new master, its current master must be defeated, but "defeated" does ''not'' mean "killed". It could mean something as simple as Disarming, as [[spoiler: Harry]] did to the real master of the Elder Wand as of the end of HalfBloodPrince, [[spoiler: Draco Malfoy]] (also: the master doesn't have to be using the Elder Wand for it to be defeated); also, it can't be handed over or forfeited to a new master.defeated). So there's the first link in the progression broken: Snape was never the master of the Elder Wand, because [[spoiler: he killed Dumbledore as per a prior agreement; Dumbledore more or less forfeited his mastery of the wand to Draco]]. The second link in the chain has a very low probability of being able to mutter an incantation (she'd have to hold the wand in her mouth, and proper word choice and pronunciation is kind of a big deal in the Potterverse), and she never defeated any of the wand's true masters. Neville, while [[TookALevelInBadass taking a level in badass]], ''also'' never defeated any of the wand's masters, but hey, come on. He ended up being master of a big fucking sword that can only be mastered by a true Gryffindor; he's no less {{badass}} for not being a master of the Elder Wand (which, as [[spoiler: Harry]] pointed out later, is a lot more hassle than most people want to deal with).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Um... The book very clearly explained how the Elder Wand changes masters. [[YourMileageMayVary At least, it was pretty clear to me]]. In case it wasn't, here it is: In order for the Elder Wand to recognize a new master, its current master must be defeated, but "defeated" does ''not'' mean "killed". It could mean something as simple as Disarming, as [[spoiler: Harry]] did to the real master of the Elder Wand at the end of HalfBloodPrince, [[spoiler: Draco Malfoy]] (also: the master doesn't have to be using the Elder Wand for it to be defeated); also, it can't be handed over or forfeited to a new master. So there's the first link in the progression broken: Snape was never the master of the Elder Wand, because [[spoiler: he killed Dumbledore as per a prior agreement; Dumbledore more or less forfeited his mastery of the wand to Draco]]. The second link in the chain has a very low probability of being able to mutter an incantation (she'd have to hold the wand in her mouth, and proper word choice and pronunciation is kind of a big deal in the Potterverse), and she never defeated any of the wand's true masters. Neville, while [[TookALevelInBadass taking a level in badass]], ''also'' never defeated any of the wand's masters, but hey, come on. He ended up being master of a big fucking sword that can only be mastered by a true Gryffindor; he's no less {{badass}} for not being a master of the Elder Wand (which, as [[spoiler: Harry]] pointed out later, is a lot more hassle than most people want to deal with).

to:

* Um... The book very clearly explained how the Elder Wand changes masters. [[YourMileageMayVary At least, it was pretty clear to me]]. In case it wasn't, here it is: In order for the Elder Wand to recognize a new master, its current master must be defeated, but "defeated" does ''not'' mean "killed". It could mean something as simple as Disarming, as [[spoiler: Harry]] did to the real master of the Elder Wand at as of the end of HalfBloodPrince, [[spoiler: Draco Malfoy]] (also: the master doesn't have to be using the Elder Wand for it to be defeated); also, it can't be handed over or forfeited to a new master. So there's the first link in the progression broken: Snape was never the master of the Elder Wand, because [[spoiler: he killed Dumbledore as per a prior agreement; Dumbledore more or less forfeited his mastery of the wand to Draco]]. The second link in the chain has a very low probability of being able to mutter an incantation (she'd have to hold the wand in her mouth, and proper word choice and pronunciation is kind of a big deal in the Potterverse), and she never defeated any of the wand's true masters. Neville, while [[TookALevelInBadass taking a level in badass]], ''also'' never defeated any of the wand's masters, but hey, come on. He ended up being master of a big fucking sword that can only be mastered by a true Gryffindor; he's no less {{badass}} for not being a master of the Elder Wand (which, as [[spoiler: Harry]] pointed out later, is a lot more hassle than most people want to deal with).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** [[SarcasmMode That must have been one hell of a cabbage patch, then, if Harry and Ginny managed to find kids that looked so much like them.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Except that Snape was never the master of the Elder Wand. The way in which it changes masters is pretty clearly defined in the book: The current master must be defeated (but not necessarily ''killed'', which is how [[spoiler: Draco and eventually Harry]] end up mastering it). Snape never defeated Dumbledore; [[spoiler: he killed Dumbledore on Dumbledore's own orders, which results in the wizarding equivalent of a forefeit]].

to:

** Except that *Um... The book very clearly explained how the Elder Wand changes masters. [[YourMileageMayVary At least, it was pretty clear to me]]. In case it wasn't, here it is: In order for the Elder Wand to recognize a new master, its current master must be defeated, but "defeated" does ''not'' mean "killed". It could mean something as simple as Disarming, as [[spoiler: Harry]] did to the real master of the Elder Wand at the end of HalfBloodPrince, [[spoiler: Draco Malfoy]] (also: the master doesn't have to be using the Elder Wand for it to be defeated); also, it can't be handed over or forfeited to a new master. So there's the first link in the progression broken: Snape was never the master of the Elder Wand. The way in which it changes masters is pretty clearly defined in the book: The current master must be defeated (but not necessarily ''killed'', which is how [[spoiler: Draco and eventually Harry]] end up mastering it). Snape never defeated Dumbledore; Wand, because [[spoiler: he killed Dumbledore on Dumbledore's own orders, which results as per a prior agreement; Dumbledore more or less forfeited his mastery of the wand to Draco]]. The second link in the wizarding equivalent chain has a very low probability of being able to mutter an incantation (she'd have to hold the wand in her mouth, and proper word choice and pronunciation is kind of a forefeit]].
big deal in the Potterverse), and she never defeated any of the wand's true masters. Neville, while [[TookALevelInBadass taking a level in badass]], ''also'' never defeated any of the wand's masters, but hey, come on. He ended up being master of a big fucking sword that can only be mastered by a true Gryffindor; he's no less {{badass}} for not being a master of the Elder Wand (which, as [[spoiler: Harry]] pointed out later, is a lot more hassle than most people want to deal with).

Added: 348

Changed: 550

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Whoever suggested that Lily is Crookshanks: Are you ''really'' that oblivious to how much "Lily Lives!" theories cheapen her sacrifice? Any loving mother, when confronted by a psychopath who wants to kill their child, would offer themselves up in place of the child; to suggest that Lily ''wouldn't'' is to suggest that she was a selfish shrew.




to:

**I think that's pretty likely, actually. After all, [[spoiler: Severus Snape]] was "the bravest man [Harry] ever knew."




to:

**Except that Snape was never the master of the Elder Wand. The way in which it changes masters is pretty clearly defined in the book: The current master must be defeated (but not necessarily ''killed'', which is how [[spoiler: Draco and eventually Harry]] end up mastering it). Snape never defeated Dumbledore; [[spoiler: he killed Dumbledore on Dumbledore's own orders, which results in the wizarding equivalent of a forefeit]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


When he fell through the curtain (in the book, anyway), he wasn't dead yet. Having passed into the land of death, he's become immortal; but he suffers constantly with an agony beyond a thousand deaths because physical bodies aren't made to cross over, just spirits. And he can never die. Ever. Like, ''ever'' ever, since the universe thinks he's already dead, and all three components of him (mind, body, and spirit/soul) are beyond the veil with it still intact, and thus imbued with the power and eventually the attributes of death. It is for this reason that he may have become a death, or even, if he was the only one to cross the veil while no longer alive but not yet dead (going by the events of the movie), and considering that death is timeless, the Death shown in the tale of the three brothers. Aside from the total badassity of Sirius being the Death in the story, this leads to the next guess...

to:

When he fell through the curtain (in the book, anyway), he wasn't dead yet. Having passed into the land of death, he's become immortal; but he suffers constantly with an agony beyond a thousand deaths because physical bodies aren't made to cross over, just spirits. And he can never die. Ever. Like, ''ever'' ever, since the universe thinks he's already dead, and all three components of him (mind, body, and spirit/soul) are beyond the veil with it all three still intact, and thus imbued with the power and eventually the attributes of death. It is for this reason that he may have become a death, or even, if he was the only one to cross the veil while no longer alive but not yet dead (going by the events of the movie), and considering that death is timeless, the Death shown in the tale of the three brothers. Aside from the total badassity of Sirius being the Death in the story, this leads to the next guess...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Death seems to be a [[trickster]] when he gives the deathly hallows to the Peverell brothers. He claims the lives of the older two brothers after they use their gifts foolishly. It sounds like something Der Tod would do.

to:

Death seems to be a [[trickster]] {{trickster}} when he gives the deathly hallows to the Peverell brothers. He claims the lives of the older two brothers after they use their gifts foolishly. It sounds like something Der Tod would do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Death seems to be a [[tricksterarchetype]] when he gives the deathly hallows to the Peverell brothers. He claims the lives of the older two brothers after they use their gifts foolishly. It sounds like something Der Tod would do.

to:

Death seems to be a [[tricksterarchetype]] [[trickster]] when he gives the deathly hallows to the Peverell brothers. He claims the lives of the older two brothers after they use their gifts foolishly. It sounds like something Der Tod would do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG:Death, from the Tale of the Three Brothers, is actually...]]
Der Tod from {{Elisabeth}}.

to:

[[WMG:Death, from the Tale of the Three Brothers, is actually...Der Tod from {{Elisabeth}}.]]
Death seems to be a [[tricksterarchetype]] when he gives the deathly hallows to the Peverell brothers. He claims the lives of the older two brothers after they use their gifts foolishly. It sounds like something Der Tod from {{Elisabeth}}.would do.



When he fell through the curtain (in the book, anyway), he wasn't dead yet. Having passed into the land of death, he's become immortal; but he suffers constantly with an agony beyond a thousand deaths because physical bodies aren't made to cross over, just spirits. And he can never die. Ever. Like, ''ever'' ever, since the universe thinks he's already dead, and all three components of him (mind, body, and spirit/soul) are beyond the veil with lt stll intact, and thus imbued with the power and eventually the attributes of death. It is for this reason that he may have become a death, or even, if he was the only one to cross the veil while no longer alive but not yet dead (going by the events of the movie), and considering that death is timeless, the Death shown in the tale of the three brothers. Aside from the total badassity of Sirius being the Death in the story, this leads to the next guess...

to:

When he fell through the curtain (in the book, anyway), he wasn't dead yet. Having passed into the land of death, he's become immortal; but he suffers constantly with an agony beyond a thousand deaths because physical bodies aren't made to cross over, just spirits. And he can never die. Ever. Like, ''ever'' ever, since the universe thinks he's already dead, and all three components of him (mind, body, and spirit/soul) are beyond the veil with lt stll it still intact, and thus imbued with the power and eventually the attributes of death. It is for this reason that he may have become a death, or even, if he was the only one to cross the veil while no longer alive but not yet dead (going by the events of the movie), and considering that death is timeless, the Death shown in the tale of the three brothers. Aside from the total badassity of Sirius being the Death in the story, this leads to the next guess...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[WMG: Neville is the master of the Elder Wand.]]
They were wrong about which way the split in the Elder Wand's control went, and it went Snape->[[spoiler: Nagini]]->Neville. Nobody said it had to be a ''wizard'' to control the wand, and for bonus points, the presumably first non-human to control it was also female.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* On the other hand, that may have also been Harry's only chance to get laid. [[YouDontWantToDieAVirginDoYou Ever.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None





* But then how would the Resurrection Stone have brought him back in the end of DH?






Added: 3063

Removed: 801

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[WMG:The eavesdropper heard the entire prophecy, and arranged to tell only a fragment.]]
Trelawney describes the eavesdropper's "rude interruption" as having happened ''after'' she felt a bit queasy -- an inconsequential queasiness that she still remembers some seventeen years later, mark you -- and, being totally oblivious to what had occurred, she has no reason to lie. Dumbledore, however, whose version is utterly incompatible with Trelawney's, has every reason to lie. This is also his Ironclad Reason, which explains why he won't discuss ''that'' with Harry, either. His understandable guilt regarding the incident inspires his mutterings in The Cave and his oversheltering of Harry.
* [[spoiler:Given everything else we learn about Dumbledore, this theory's refutal is probably for the best.]]


Added DiffLines:


[[WMG: Sirius isn't dead, but would be better off if he was. (He may also be [[TheGrimReaper Death...]] or ''a'' Death.)]]
When he fell through the curtain (in the book, anyway), he wasn't dead yet. Having passed into the land of death, he's become immortal; but he suffers constantly with an agony beyond a thousand deaths because physical bodies aren't made to cross over, just spirits. And he can never die. Ever. Like, ''ever'' ever, since the universe thinks he's already dead, and all three components of him (mind, body, and spirit/soul) are beyond the veil with lt stll intact, and thus imbued with the power and eventually the attributes of death. It is for this reason that he may have become a death, or even, if he was the only one to cross the veil while no longer alive but not yet dead (going by the events of the movie), and considering that death is timeless, the Death shown in the tale of the three brothers. Aside from the total badassity of Sirius being the Death in the story, this leads to the next guess...
* And remember, Sirius is constantly mistaken for the Grim in the early books- an omen which heralds death.
* But then how would the Resurrection Stone have brought him back in the end of DH?

[[WMG: The core of the Elder Wand is a hair from the scalp of Death.]]
People assume that the Death in the tale of the three brothers was a skeleton, based on the most commonly used form in modern times as well as the skull in the drawing at the head of the chapter. This may be in error; Death is quite likely a relatively human-looking being. Wands typically have a core of something magical, typically a bit of a fantastic creature (hair, feather, heartstring). The book states that Death fashioned a wand from the branch of an elder tree; it doesn't say how, and no mention is made of the core. This not only allows any fatal spell to be blocked and fatal spells cast by the wand to have that extra "kick," but also means that the wielder carries death with him in a more literal way than the average mortal. Hence, why people with the Elder Wand tend to die gruesome deaths even when they aren't being boastful about their super-fancy deathwand.

[[WMG: Death is a Thestral.]]
Or rather, all thestrals are literal personifications of Death.

[[WMG:The eavesdropper heard the entire prophecy, and arranged to tell only a fragment.]]
Trelawney describes the eavesdropper's "rude interruption" as having happened ''after'' she felt a bit queasy -- an inconsequential queasiness that she still remembers some seventeen years later, mark you -- and, being totally oblivious to what had occurred, she has no reason to lie. Dumbledore, however, whose version is utterly incompatible with Trelawney's, has every reason to lie. This is also his Ironclad Reason, which explains why he won't discuss ''that'' with Harry, either. His understandable guilt regarding the incident inspires his mutterings in The Cave and his oversheltering of Harry.
* [[spoiler:Given everything else we learn about Dumbledore, this theory's refutal is probably for the best.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Der Tod from {{Elisabeth}} and the Shinigami King from {{Death Note}}.

to:

Der Tod from {{Elisabeth}} and the Shinigami King from {{Death Note}}.{{Elisabeth}}.

Top