Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
to:
* This is a very interesting theory that got explored in detail in [[https://forums.court-records.net/viewtopic.php?p=1182061 this post in Court-Records]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 92,93 (click to see context) from:
* According to VisualNovel/SpiritOfJustice, [[spoiler:you are technically correct, on the basic idea of it being a murder. It’s just, not quite how you described it. Jove was a musician, not a magician, the murderer was Queen Ga'ran when she set Amara's house on fire, Amara's husband Dhurke (who would later adopt Apollo) was the one blamed for it, and the evidence that blows things open is a Divination Seance, as Jove just happened to be looking at something that reflected an image of Ga'ran. Finally, Apollo and Trucy still don't know about their relationship, although the epilogue implies they will soon. Long story short, theory confirmed, specifics jossed. Still a pretty interesting case idea, though.]]
to:
* According to VisualNovel/SpiritOfJustice, VisualNovel/PhoenixWrightAceAttorneySpiritOfJustice, [[spoiler:you are technically correct, on the basic idea of it being a murder. It’s just, not quite how you described it. Jove was a musician, not a magician, the murderer was Queen Ga'ran when she set Amara's house on fire, Amara's husband Dhurke (who would later adopt Apollo) was the one blamed for it, and the evidence that blows things open is a Divination Seance, as Jove just happened to be looking at something that reflected an image of Ga'ran. Finally, Apollo and Trucy still don't know about their relationship, although the epilogue implies they will soon. Long story short, theory confirmed, specifics jossed. Still a pretty interesting case idea, though.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 73 (click to see context) from:
to:
** Larry, Maggey, and Will couldn't be counted on to vote with ''truth'' though. Larry wouldn't convict Vera for anything because she's cute. He's simply not a reliable or fair juror. Maggey and Will are both very easily swayed and also easily fooled. Maggey is very impulsive and blindly believes in Phoenix. Will would see how fragile and sweet vera is and his good heart and sympathetic soul would have him vote Not Guilty. They don't make good candidates, either. I'd say they're as bad as Oldbag in terms of picks. I'll say Adrian Andrews and Guy Eldoon make sense, and I actually say Lotta makes sense as even though she's quick to jump to conclusions ''when she can get herself involved'', once she's not a witness anymore, she's surprisingly perceptive (think how she acts in 2-2; she picks up on Morgan's shiftiness and motive pretty fast). Guy is pretty level-headed and reasonable, so I think he makes perfect sense. Adrian when she slows down is pretty level-headed herself and a pretty good judge of character when she has time to think. Adrian, Guy, Lotta, and Thalassa. I think the last two would be Kay Faraday (per suggestion by Edgeworth who was most certainly involved in this) and though the sixth is hard to pin down, I want to suggest someone unusual: Angel Starr. She is pretty rigid in her feelings towards the truth, to the point she lashed out at Lana for trying to cover up the truth and ironically lied a little to get justice and bring the truth out. As to the two other Guilty verdicts, I think Angel and Lotta. Lotta with reluctance, but something just doesn't feel right to her either way. I also think she'd regret her vote. But Lotta is the kind of person who loves evidence, even if she does often jump to conclusions. Same with Angel- evidence is everything to her; she wants proof Vera is innocent. Guy, Adrian, and Kay would be the Not Guilty crowd. I think the heaps of circumstantial evidence would be enough for all three of them factoring in what they're like. (it is as this is typed it occurs to me there are not a lot of logical choices for male jurors).
Changed line(s) 104,105 (click to see context) from:
Why does any of this matter? Well as far as we know, the evidence that said Apollo was Thalassa’s son was his ability to perceive like a Grammarye and his bracelet. We don’t know what his father looked like so we cannot compare the two of them and Thalassa wouldn’t recognize a child she hasn’t seen in 21 years. But if his power is not like the Grammaryes, then that means the only thing connecting him to them is his bracelet. And Apollo himself never said how he came to acquire the bracelet (the one flashback we have of Apollo from when he was younger is the flashback with Clay. If you look at the left hand, which is the hand the bracelet is always on, the bracelet cannot be seen.) We all merely assumed that Apollo has had the bracelet his entire life since his mother was said to be Thalassa. But if his ability does not come from the Grammaryes and he has not had the bracelet his entire life…then that means that Apollo isn’t Thalassa’s son and Trucy's brother after all.
to:
Why does any of this matter? Well as far as we know, the evidence that said Apollo was Thalassa’s son was his ability to perceive like a Grammarye and his bracelet. We don’t know what his father looked like so we cannot compare the two of them and Thalassa wouldn’t recognize a child she hasn’t seen in 21 years. But if his power is not like the Grammaryes, then that means the only thing connecting him to them is his bracelet. And Apollo himself never said how he came to acquire the bracelet (the one flashback we have of Apollo from when he was younger is the flashback with Clay. If you look at the left hand, which is the hand the bracelet is always on, the bracelet cannot be seen.) We all merely assumed that Apollo has had the bracelet his entire life since his mother was said to be Thalassa. But if his ability does not come from the Grammaryes and he has not had the bracelet his entire life…then that means that Apollo isn’t isn’t Thalassa’s son and Trucy's brother after all.
