Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
Articles I have started (not really indicative of my interests, just what I came across that lacked a page yet):
to:
Articles I have started (not really indicative of my interests, just what I came across that lacked a page yet): yet). Somewhat oddly, most were created well after their subject had been released:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 31 (click to see context) from:
CriticalStaffingShortage
to:
* CriticalStaffingShortage
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
CriticalStaffingShortage
Added DiffLines:
* VirtualDangerDenial
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* AnArmAndALeg (My first trope to 1000 wicks, I feel so proud.)
Changed line(s) 42 (click to see context) from:
* RepairDontRespond
to:
* RepairDontRespondRepairDontRespond (You know you hit a good name for a concept when multiple other pages get folded into it and you regularly come across other people using it. One of the ideas I'm most proud of.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* MonumentalView
Changed line(s) 54,55 (click to see context) from:
* WhyDoYouHateTheDog
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6,7 (click to see context) from:
* Spoilers should be reduced as much as possible. I keep them on so that I can be aware of them, though I always look underneath. Founder of TropersOpposedToNegligentAndGratuitousSpoilers to counter their mis- and overuse.
* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline to commit to any naming convention, as each have their pros, cons, and exceptions.
* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline to commit to any naming convention, as each have their pros, cons, and exceptions.
to:
* Spoilers Spoiler tags should be reduced used as much little as possible.possible. Minor plot points, oneshot characters, and characteristics should all be left un spoiler tagged. I keep them on so that I can be aware of them, though I always look underneath. Founder of TropersOpposedToNegligentAndGratuitousSpoilers to counter their mis- and overuse.\n* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline to commit to any naming convention, as each have their pros, cons, and exceptions.
Changed line(s) 10,12 (click to see context) from:
* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity. Unfortunately, much of the community of the site that is active there is polarized and cliqueish. For instance, TropeRepairShop people pounce on anyone from outside interested in making the case for a trope to be kept, responding with rudeness and sarcasm, then censure anyone who responds in kind because they aren't part of the group. In general on the forums, if you aren't a name they recognize prepare to encounter a 'not made here' attitude that is really negatively affecting the site. So I stick to editing formatting and the occasional new trope or work page and leave larger issues alone.
* Edit reasons are generally unnecessary since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw; 90% of changes are simply not going to be noticed or disputed in any way. In addition, not putting an edit reason gives less cause for dispute; the old 'if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all' comes to mind. I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case. And don't be upset if I don't PM you before making a modification, I absolutely never use that first thing.
* Edit reasons are generally unnecessary since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw; 90% of changes are simply not going to be noticed or disputed in any way. In addition, not putting an edit reason gives less cause for dispute; the old 'if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all' comes to mind. I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case. And don't be upset if I don't PM you before making a modification, I absolutely never use that first thing.
to:
* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity. Unfortunately, much of the community of the site that is active there is polarized and cliqueish. For instance, in my experience TropeRepairShop people regulars pounce on anyone from outside interested in making the case for a trope to be kept, responding with rudeness and sarcasm, then censure censuring anyone who responds in kind because they aren't part of the group. In general on the forums, if you aren't a name they recognize prepare to encounter a 'not made here' attitude that is really negatively affecting the site. So I stick to editing formatting and the occasional new trope or work page and leave larger issues alone.
* Censorship and gratuitous vulgarity are both uncalled for. In general I let work derived vulgarity stand but ease user created vulgarity. I consider the gutting of works and tropes considered to be too sexual to be a travesty against wisdom and maturity; we're all adults or will be in a few years, and pretending things don't exist by erasing them or disallowing them for inherently amorphous values that shift over time is a tragedy of censorship.
* Edit reasons are generally unnecessary since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw; 90% of changes are simply not going to be noticed or disputed in any way. In addition, not putting an edit reason gives less cause for dispute; the old 'if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all' comes to mind. I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't thecase. And don't be upset if I don't PM you before making a modification, I absolutely never use that first thing.
case.
* Censorship and gratuitous vulgarity are both uncalled for. In general I let work derived vulgarity stand but ease user created vulgarity. I consider the gutting of works and tropes considered to be too sexual to be a travesty against wisdom and maturity; we're all adults or will be in a few years, and pretending things don't exist by erasing them or disallowing them for inherently amorphous values that shift over time is a tragedy of censorship.
* Edit reasons are generally unnecessary since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw; 90% of changes are simply not going to be noticed or disputed in any way. In addition, not putting an edit reason gives less cause for dispute; the old 'if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all' comes to mind. I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity. Administration of the site is polarized and cliqueish. For instance, TropeRepairShop people pounce on anyone from outside interested in making the case for a trope to be kept, responding with rudeness and sarcasm, then censure anyone who responds in kind because they aren't part of the group. In general, if you aren't a name they recognize prepare to encounter a 'not made here' attitude that is really negatively affecting the site. So I stick to editing formatting and the occasional new trope or work page and leave larger issues alone.
to:
* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity. Administration Unfortunately, much of the community of the site that is active there is polarized and cliqueish. For instance, TropeRepairShop people pounce on anyone from outside interested in making the case for a trope to be kept, responding with rudeness and sarcasm, then censure anyone who responds in kind because they aren't part of the group. In general, general on the forums, if you aren't a name they recognize prepare to encounter a 'not made here' attitude that is really negatively affecting the site. So I stick to editing formatting and the occasional new trope or work page and leave larger issues alone.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 39 (click to see context) :
* PowerEqualsResponsibility
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 24 (click to see context) from:
Tropes I have created the pages for:
to:
Tropes I have created the pages for: YKTTW for:
* The47Society
* AdaptationInspiration
* AmicableExes
* CasualInterplanetaryTravel
* The47Society
* AdaptationInspiration
* AmicableExes
* CasualInterplanetaryTravel
Added DiffLines:
* EveryonesInTheLoop
* FirstPersonPerspective
* HatedHometown
* FirstPersonPerspective
* HatedHometown
Added DiffLines:
* LinkingToAnArticleWithinTheArticle
* OddlyOvertrainedSecurity
* PerfectionIsImpossible
* PlotSensitiveLatch
* PowerEqualsResponsibility
* OddlyOvertrainedSecurity
* PerfectionIsImpossible
* PlotSensitiveLatch
* PowerEqualsResponsibility
Added DiffLines:
* RandomPasserbyAdvice
Added DiffLines:
* RevengeMyopia
* SavedForTheSequel
* ScaleModelDestruction
* SexWithTheEx
* TheShelfOfMovieLanguishment
* SpaceEpisode
* SavedForTheSequel
* ScaleModelDestruction
* SexWithTheEx
* TheShelfOfMovieLanguishment
* SpaceEpisode
Added DiffLines:
* TwentyMinutesIntoThePast
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,4 (click to see context) from:
I'm mostly an editor and tends to focus on cleaning up entries and pages, although I have created quite a few of both (as listed below) and added tropes and examples. I've been probably been editing since about September of 2008. I fit pretty well into the bell curve of TroperDemographics. I'm from Southern California.
My main (relevant to this site) life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that way. Unfortunately, it's also led to an acute sense of how much I don't know.
My main (relevant to this site) life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that way. Unfortunately, it's also led to an acute sense of how much I don't know.
to:
I'm mostly an editor and tends tend to focus on cleaning up entries and pages, although I have created quite a few of both (as listed several pages (listed below) and added tropes and examples. I've been probably been editing since about September of 2008. I fit pretty well into the bell curve of TroperDemographics. I'm from Southern California.
My main (relevant to this site) life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinkingCalifornia. I'm a fellow expert for pretty good at least remaining objective, but I'm pretty bad at ''sounding'' objective, since I generally don't speak unless I care.
I like to accumulate knowledge, and know quite acouple bit about a wide variety of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that way.fields. Unfortunately, it's also led to an acute sense of how much I don't know.
My main (relevant to this site) life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking
I like to accumulate knowledge, and know quite a
Changed line(s) 10,12 (click to see context) from:
* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later -- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg. adding a trope, spoilering it). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later -- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg. adding a trope, spoilering it). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
to:
* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity.
humanity. Administration of the site is polarized and cliqueish. For instance, TropeRepairShop people pounce on anyone from outside interested in making the case for a trope to be kept, responding with rudeness and sarcasm, then censure anyone who responds in kind because they aren't part of the group. In general, if you aren't a name they recognize prepare to encounter a 'not made here' attitude that is really negatively affecting the site. So I stick to editing formatting and the occasional new trope or work page and leave larger issues alone.
* Editentries reasons are generally only necessary the second time around, unnecessary since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that SturgeonsLaw; 90% of changes are driveby edits, never simply not going to be checked up on again and never to notice if noticed or disputed in any way. In addition, not putting an edit reason gives less cause for dispute; the old 'if you delete it an hour later -- or if they do check, they don't decide have anything nice to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg. adding a trope, spoilering it). say, don't say anything at all' comes to mind. I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
case. And don't be upset if I don't PM you before making a modification, I absolutely never use that first thing.
* Edit
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
to:
* {{Defiance}}
Changed line(s) 36,40 (click to see context) from:
Articles I've overhauled and am keeping a close eye on (read: I check every time their main page and subpages are edited):
* TheSalvationWar
* UpInTheAir
Quite a few others.
* TheSalvationWar
* UpInTheAir
Quite a few others.
to:
* TheSalvationWar
* UpInTheAir
Quite
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 34,35 (click to see context) from:
* WhyDoYouHateTheDog?
to:
* WhyDoYouHateTheDog?
WhyDoYouHateTheDog
Added DiffLines:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 37,39 (click to see context) from:
TheSalvationWar
UpInTheAir
A quite a few others.
UpInTheAir
A quite a few others.
to:
* TheSalvationWar
* UpInTheAir
A quite Quite a few others.
* UpInTheAir
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,4 (click to see context) from:
I'm an editor from Southern California who tends to focus on cleaning up entries and pages, although I have created quite a few of both (as listed below). I've been probably been editing since about September of 2008. I fit pretty well into the bell curve of TroperDemographics.
My main (relevant to this site) life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that way.
My main (relevant to this site) life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that way.
to:
I'm mostly an editor from Southern California who and tends to focus on cleaning up entries and pages, although I have created quite a few of both (as listed below).below) and added tropes and examples. I've been probably been editing since about September of 2008. I fit pretty well into the bell curve of TroperDemographics.
TroperDemographics. I'm from Southern California.
My main (relevant to this site) life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations thatway.
way. Unfortunately, it's also led to an acute sense of how much I don't know.
My main (relevant to this site) life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
Articles I have started:
to:
It feels like bragging, but I've noticed it's a common thing for people to note on these pages what pages they've created/edit/whatever, so here's mine.
Articles I havestarted: started (not really indicative of my interests, just what I came across that lacked a page yet):
Articles I have
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* NewspaperComic/NonSequitur
to:
* NewspaperComic/NonSequiturComicStrip/NonSequitur
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10,12 (click to see context) from:
* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
to:
* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons.
reasons, a lot of them having to do with my faith in humanity.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hourlater- later -- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg eg. adding a trope, spoilering it). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour
Added DiffLines:
* {{Film/Battleship}}
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8,10 (click to see context) from:
* I believe in politeness, yet I have a tendency to be sarcastic. Sorry about that, it's a personal demon I try to counter. There are several habits on the wiki that I consider rude, like bolding trope names in a response.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
to:
* I believe in politeness, yet I have a tendency to be sarcastic. Sorry about that, it's a personal demon I try to counter. I can also be politely rude sometimes, usually to self kicking when I look at it later.
* There are severalhabits common practices on the wiki that I consider rude, like bolding trope names in a response.
* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoileringit.).it). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
* There are several
* I try to avoid the forums for multiple reasons.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,4 (click to see context) from:
Hi. I'm me, and as you may have figured out by now, you are you. I am an editor of the species Homo sapiens sapiens. I've been active off and on (mostly on) since September of 2008, or maybe sooner; it might be sooner, because I remember many references to TheGreatCrash but it had been several months since that (presumably) horrible event. I think CodeGeass brought me here, but I'm not sure.
...Ahem. As you can see, I have a tendency to go into detail and a not very clear memory (though it is ''very'' expansive). My most relevant life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that way.
...Ahem. As you can see, I have a tendency to go into detail and a not very clear memory (though it is ''very'' expansive). My most relevant life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations that way.
to:
...Ahem. As you can see, I have a tendency to go
My
Changed line(s) 6,10 (click to see context) from:
* Spoilers should be reduced as much as possible. I keep them on so that I can be aware of them, though I always look underneath. I'm currently looking into starting a society to counter their overuse.
* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline to commit.
* I believe in politeness, yet I have a tendency to be sarcastic. Sorry about that, it's a personal demon I'm trying to counter.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do chck, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline to commit.
* I believe in politeness, yet I have a tendency to be sarcastic. Sorry about that, it's a personal demon I'm trying to counter.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do chck, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
to:
* Spoilers should be reduced as much as possible. I keep them on so that I can be aware of them, though I always look underneath. I'm currently looking into starting a society Founder of TropersOpposedToNegligentAndGratuitousSpoilers to counter their mis- and overuse.
* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline tocommit.
commit to any naming convention, as each have their pros, cons, and exceptions.
* I believe in politeness, yet I have a tendency to be sarcastic. Sorry about that, it's a personal demonI'm trying I try to counter.
counter. There are several habits on the wiki that I consider rude, like bolding trope names in a response.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they dochck, check, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline to
* I believe in politeness, yet I have a tendency to be sarcastic. Sorry about that, it's a personal demon
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do
* {{Flashpoint}}
* NewspaperComic/NonSequitur
* TheSkyCrawlers
* {{Strikeback}}
Tropes I have created the pages for:
* NewspaperComic/NonSequitur
* TheSkyCrawlers
* {{Strikeback}}
Tropes I have created the pages for:
Deleted line(s) 18 (click to see context) :
* {{Strikeback}}
Changed line(s) 25,29 (click to see context) from:
* {{Flashpoint}}
* TheSkyCrawlers
* NewspaperComic/NonSequitur
Articles I've overhauled and am keeping an eye on:
* TheSkyCrawlers
* NewspaperComic/NonSequitur
Articles I've overhauled and am keeping an eye on:
to:
* TheSkyCrawlers
* NewspaperComic/NonSequitur
Articles I've overhauled and am keeping
Changed line(s) 32 (click to see context) from:
A whole bunch of others.
to:
A whole bunch of quite a few others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* Series/Strikeback
to:
* Series/Strikeback{{Strikeback}}
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
Articles I've taken under my wing (so be nice to them or else!):
to:
Articles I've taken under my wing (so be nice to them or else!):overhauled and am keeping an eye on:
Added DiffLines:
UpInTheAir
A whole bunch of others.
A whole bunch of others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* ThrowingOffTheDisability
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* [[ptitlem9zm3qtq What's An X Like You Doing In A Y Like This?]]
to:
* [[ptitlem9zm3qtq [[WhatsAnXLikeYouDoingInAYLikeThis What's An X Like You Doing In A Y Like This?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* VastBureaucracy
* [[ptitlem9zm3qtq What's An X Like You Doing In A Y Like This?]]
* [[ptitlem9zm3qtq What's An X Like You Doing In A Y Like This?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) from:
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do chck, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first
to:
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do chck, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first
first edit, but don't get angry if that isn't the case.
Changed line(s) 23,26 (click to see context) from:
Articles I have contributed greatly to, and perhaps led you to this page:
ZipMeUp
Articles I've taken under my wing
ZipMeUp
Articles I've taken under my wing
to:
ZipMeUp
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,5 (click to see context) from:
Hi. I'm me, and as you may have figured out by now, you are you. I am an editor of the species Homo sapiens sapiens. I've been active off and on (mostly on) since September of 2008, or maybe sooner it might be sooner, because I remember many references to TheGreatCrash but it had been several months since that (presumably) horrible event. I think Code Geass brought me here, but I'm not sure.
...Ahem. As you can see, I have a tendency to go into detail and a not very clear memory (though it is ''very'' expansive). My most relevant life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations about WorldOfWarcraft and {{Twilight}} that way.
...Ahem. As you can see, I have a tendency to go into detail and a not very clear memory (though it is ''very'' expansive). My most relevant life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations about WorldOfWarcraft and {{Twilight}} that way.
to:
Hi. I'm me, and as you may have figured out by now, you are you. I am an editor of the species Homo sapiens sapiens. I've been active off and on (mostly on) since September of 2008, or maybe sooner sooner; it might be sooner, because I remember many references to TheGreatCrash but it had been several months since that (presumably) horrible event. I think Code Geass CodeGeass brought me here, but I'm not sure.
...Ahem. As you can see, I have a tendency to go into detail and a not very clear memory (though it is ''very'' expansive). My most relevant life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversationsabout WorldOfWarcraft and {{Twilight}} that way.
A few of my philosophical views as a troper:
* Spoilers should be reduced as much as possible. I keep them on so that I can be aware of them, though I always look underneath. I'm currently looking into starting a society to counter their overuse.
* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline to commit.
* I believe in politeness, yet I have a tendency to be sarcastic. Sorry about that, it's a personal demon I'm trying to counter.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do chck, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first
...Ahem. As you can see, I have a tendency to go into detail and a not very clear memory (though it is ''very'' expansive). My most relevant life objective is to know enough about everything to fool an expert in anything into thinking I'm a fellow expert for at least a couple of minutes. I've had some excellent conversations
A few of my philosophical views as a troper:
* Spoilers should be reduced as much as possible. I keep them on so that I can be aware of them, though I always look underneath. I'm currently looking into starting a society to counter their overuse.
* I lean heavily towards SPOON, but decline to commit.
* I believe in politeness, yet I have a tendency to be sarcastic. Sorry about that, it's a personal demon I'm trying to counter.
* Edit entries are generally only necessary the second time around, since edits seem to follow a modified form of SturgeonsLaw, in that 90% are driveby edits, never to be checked up on again and never to notice if you delete it an hour later- or if they do chck, they don't decide to read it (modify language as needed for any other editing activity, eg adding a trope, spoilering it.). I still do it sometimes on the first
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
to:
* NewspaperComic/NonSequitur
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14,15 (click to see context) from:
* SkyCrawlers
to:
* SkyCrawlers
TheSkyCrawlers
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14,16 (click to see context) from:
*
Articles I have contributed greatly to, and perhaps led you to this page:
Articles I have contributed greatly to, and perhaps led you to this page:
to:
Articles I have contributed greatly to, and perhaps led you to this
ZipMeUp
Articles I've taken under my wing