Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trivia cannot be played with
Deleted line(s) 9 (click to see context) :
* GayPanic: {{Averted}}. Chief Censor John Trevelyan warned the studio about depictions of lesbianism, specifically the scene where Carmilla seduces Emma, which they wanted removed. They also pointed out that a previous lesbian film, ''Film/TheKillingOfSisterGeorge'', had five minutes excised by his office. In response, Hammer replied that the lesbianism was not of their doing but was present in the original story. Trevelyan finally backed down.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CompletelyDifferentTitle:
** France: ''Passion for Vampires''
** Brazil: ''Deadly Attraction''
** Finland: ''Passions of the Dead''
** Netherlands: ''A Vampire's Kiss of Death''
** Norway: ''The Vampire''
** Sweden: ''The Vampire: An Erotic Nightmare''
** Germany: ''Crypt of the Vampires''
** France: ''Passion for Vampires''
** Brazil: ''Deadly Attraction''
** Finland: ''Passions of the Dead''
** Netherlands: ''A Vampire's Kiss of Death''
** Norway: ''The Vampire''
** Sweden: ''The Vampire: An Erotic Nightmare''
** Germany: ''Crypt of the Vampires''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* InternationalCoProduction: The film was a co-production between Hammer and American International, who were interested in a vampire movie with more explicit sexual content to take advantage of a more relaxed censorship environment.
to:
* InternationalCoProduction: InternationalCoproduction: The film was a co-production between Hammer and American International, Creator/AmericanInternationalPictures, who were interested in a vampire movie with more explicit sexual content to take advantage of a more relaxed censorship environment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* GayPanic: {{Averted}}. Chief Censor John Trevelyan warned the studio about depictions of lesbianism, specifically the scene where Carmilla seduces Emma, which they wanted removed. They also pointed out that a previous lesbian film, ''Film/TheKillingOfSisterGeorge'', had five minutes excised by his office. In response, Hammer replied that the lesbianism was not of their doing but was present in the original story. Trevelyan finally backed down.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* InternationalCoproduction: The film was a co-production between Hammer and American International, who were interested in a vampire movie with more explicit sexual content to take advantage of a more relaxed censorship environment.
to:
* InternationalCoproduction: InternationalCoProduction: The film was a co-production between Hammer and American International, who were interested in a vampire movie with more explicit sexual content to take advantage of a more relaxed censorship environment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* InternationalCoProduction: The film was a co-production between Hammer and American International, who were interested in a vampire movie with more explicit sexual content to take advantage of a more relaxed censorship environment.
to:
* InternationalCoProduction: InternationalCoproduction: The film was a co-production between Hammer and American International, who were interested in a vampire movie with more explicit sexual content to take advantage of a more relaxed censorship environment.
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* WordOfGay: The director claimed that, after reading the novella Carmilla twice, he didn't get a sense of any lesbian content. Creator/IngridPitt also claimed she didn't play the role as though the vampire was a lesbian but asexual.
to:
* WordOfGay: The director claimed that, after reading the novella Carmilla ''Literature/{{Carmilla}}'' twice, he didn't get a sense of any lesbian content. Creator/IngridPitt also claimed she didn't play the role as though the vampire was a lesbian but asexual.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The role of the Man in Black was offered to Creator/ChristopherLee but he declined the role and John Forbes-Robertson was cast instead.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: InternationalCoProduction: The film was a co-production between Hammer and American International, who were interested in a vampire movie with more explicit sexual content to take advantage of a more relaxed censorship environment.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen:
** James Carreras rejected a suggestion that Creator/ShirleyEaton play the lead on the grounds that she was too old. Creator/IngridPitt, only 10 months younger than Eaton, was eventually cast.
** The role of the Man in Black was offered to Creator/ChristopherLee but he declined the role and John Forbes-Robertson was castinstead.instead.
* WordOfGay: The director claimed that, after reading the novella Carmilla twice, he didn't get a sense of any lesbian content. Creator/IngridPitt also claimed she didn't play the role as though the vampire was a lesbian but asexual.
----
* WhatCouldHaveBeen:
** James Carreras rejected a suggestion that Creator/ShirleyEaton play the lead on the grounds that she was too old. Creator/IngridPitt, only 10 months younger than Eaton, was eventually cast.
** The role of the Man in Black was offered to Creator/ChristopherLee but he declined the role and John Forbes-Robertson was cast
* WordOfGay: The director claimed that, after reading the novella Carmilla twice, he didn't get a sense of any lesbian content. Creator/IngridPitt also claimed she didn't play the role as though the vampire was a lesbian but asexual.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The role of the Man in Black was offered to Creator/ChristopherLee but he declined the role and John Forbes-Robertson was cast instead.
* WordOfGay: Ingrid Pitt also claims she didn't act as though the vampire was a lesbian but asexual.
* WordOfGay: Ingrid Pitt also claims she didn't act as though the vampire was a lesbian but asexual.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The role of the Man in Black was offered to Creator/ChristopherLee but he declined the role and John Forbes-Robertson was cast instead.
* WordOfGay: Ingrid Pitt also claims she didn't act as though the vampire was a lesbian but asexual.instead.
* WordOfGay: Ingrid Pitt also claims she didn't act as though the vampire was a lesbian but asexual.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The role of the Man in Black was offered to Creator/ChristopherLee but he declined the role and John Forbes-Robertson was cast instead.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The role of the Man in Black was offered to Creator/ChristopherLee but he declined the role and John Forbes-Robertson was cast instead.instead.
* WordOfGay: Ingrid Pitt also claims she didn't act as though the vampire was a lesbian but asexual.
* WordOfGay: Ingrid Pitt also claims she didn't act as though the vampire was a lesbian but asexual.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The role of the Man in Black was offered to Creator/ChristopherLee but he declined the role and John Forbes-Robertson was cast instead.
