Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* PopCultureUrbanLegends: Edna Purviance Chaplin's iconic leading lady from his silent shorts might not have starred in the movie as planned (see What Could Have Been), but for the longest time people believed that she was an extra in the garden party scene, however no proof exists to prove this claim.
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
** Edna Purviance, Chaplin's iconic leading lady from his silent shorts was to appear in the movie as Madame Grosnay but while she read the part well she convinced Chaplin not to use her.
to:
** Edna Purviance, Chaplin's iconic leading lady from his silent shorts was to appear in the movie as Madame Grosnay but while she read the part well she convinced Chaplin not to use her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Edna Purviance, Chaplin's iconic leading lady from his silent shorts was to appear in the movie as Madame Grosnay but while she read the part well she convinced Chaplin not to use her.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* DyeingForYourArt: Creator/CharlieChaplin spent six weeks growing a moustache to play Verdoux.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** In fact some of the movie's posters place The Little Tramp in the background or even reference him in the text.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The film was originally conceived by Creator/OrsonWelles as part of a series based on the real-life Landru, Chaplin instead made this movie and acknowledged Welles as the inspiration.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: WhatCouldHaveBeen:
** The film was originally conceived by Creator/OrsonWelles as part of a series based on the real-life Landru, Chaplin instead made this movie and acknowledged Welles as the inspiration.
** The film was originally conceived by Creator/OrsonWelles as part of a series based on the real-life Landru, Chaplin instead made this movie and acknowledged Welles as the inspiration.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 5 (click to see context) :
* ActorSharedBackground: Monsieur Verdoux states that his astrological sign is Aries. That's actually true, Creator/CharlieChaplin's sign is Aries, his birthday is on 16 April 1889.
Deleted line(s) 5 (click to see context) :
* TheForeignSubtitle:
Changed line(s) 8,11 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The Film was originally conceived by Creator/OrsonWelles as part of a series based on the real-life Landru, Chaplin instead made this movie and acknowledged Welles as the inspiration.
** Also the film was a lot more racy with dialogue suggesting that Verdoux and Floray are sharing a bed and that the Girl was a prostitute, Censorship removed those ideas.
** When casting Madame Grosnay, Charlie did think about using Edna Purviance, she did go for a reading but convinced Chaplin not to cast her. She might have been in the Garden Party Scene, but no evidence exists for this.
* WorkingTitle: ''The Ladykiller'' and ''A Comedy of Murders''.
** Also the film was a lot more racy with dialogue suggesting that Verdoux and Floray are sharing a bed and that the Girl was a prostitute, Censorship removed those ideas.
** When casting Madame Grosnay, Charlie did think about using Edna Purviance, she did go for a reading but convinced Chaplin not to cast her. She might have been in the Garden Party Scene, but no evidence exists for this.
* WorkingTitle: ''The Ladykiller'' and ''A Comedy of Murders''.
to:
* CreatorsFavoriteEpisode: Creator/CharlieChaplin regarded the film as "the cleverest and most brilliant film of my career".
* MidDevelopmentGenreShift: Creator/CharlieChaplin claimed that Creator/OrsonWelles came to his house with the idea of doing a "series of documentaries, one to be on the celebrated French murderer, Bluebeard Landru," which he thought would be a wonderful dramatic part for Chaplin. Chaplin was initially interested, as it would provide him with an opportunity for a more dramatic role, as well as saving him the trouble of having to write the film himself. However, Chaplin claims that Welles then explained that the script had not yet been written and he wanted Chaplin's help to do so. As a result, Chaplin dropped out of Welles' project. Very shortly thereafter, the idea struck Chaplin that Landru's story would make a good comedy. Chaplin then telephoned Welles and told him that while his new idea had nothing to do with Welles' proposed documentary or with Landru, he was willing to pay Welles five thousand dollars in order to "clear everything." After negotiations, Welles accepted on the terms that he would receive a "story by" screen credit. Chaplin later stated that he would have insisted on no screen credit at all had he known that Welles would eventually try to take credit for the idea.
* PlayingAgainstType: This was the first time Creator/CharlieChaplin played a character different from the Tramp persona, in this case, a wife-murderer.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: TheFilm film was originally conceived by Creator/OrsonWelles as part of a series based on the real-life Landru, Chaplin instead made this movie and acknowledged Welles as the inspiration.
**Also the The film was a lot more racy with dialogue suggesting that Verdoux and Floray are sharing a bed and that the Girl was a prostitute, prostitute. Censorship removed those ideas.
** When casting Madame Grosnay, Charlie did think about using Edna Purviance, she did go for a reading but convinced Chaplin not to cast her. She might have been in the Garden Party Scene, but no evidence exists for this.
* WorkingTitle: ''The Ladykiller'' and ''A Comedy of Murders''.Murders''.
----
* MidDevelopmentGenreShift: Creator/CharlieChaplin claimed that Creator/OrsonWelles came to his house with the idea of doing a "series of documentaries, one to be on the celebrated French murderer, Bluebeard Landru," which he thought would be a wonderful dramatic part for Chaplin. Chaplin was initially interested, as it would provide him with an opportunity for a more dramatic role, as well as saving him the trouble of having to write the film himself. However, Chaplin claims that Welles then explained that the script had not yet been written and he wanted Chaplin's help to do so. As a result, Chaplin dropped out of Welles' project. Very shortly thereafter, the idea struck Chaplin that Landru's story would make a good comedy. Chaplin then telephoned Welles and told him that while his new idea had nothing to do with Welles' proposed documentary or with Landru, he was willing to pay Welles five thousand dollars in order to "clear everything." After negotiations, Welles accepted on the terms that he would receive a "story by" screen credit. Chaplin later stated that he would have insisted on no screen credit at all had he known that Welles would eventually try to take credit for the idea.
* PlayingAgainstType: This was the first time Creator/CharlieChaplin played a character different from the Tramp persona, in this case, a wife-murderer.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: The
**
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 4 (click to see context) :
* CompletelyDifferentTitle:
** Germany and Austria: ''The Murderer of Women in Paris'' and ''The Marriage Fraud in Paris''
** Portugal: ''Bluebeard''
* TheForeignSubtitle:
** Mexico: ''Monsieur Verdoux, the Modern Bluebeard''
** Germany: ''Monsieur Verdoux: The Murderer of Women in Paris''
** Germany and Austria: ''The Murderer of Women in Paris'' and ''The Marriage Fraud in Paris''
** Portugal: ''Bluebeard''
* TheForeignSubtitle:
** Mexico: ''Monsieur Verdoux, the Modern Bluebeard''
** Germany: ''Monsieur Verdoux: The Murderer of Women in Paris''
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
** When casting Madame Grosnay, Charlie did think about using Edna Purviance, she did go for a reading but convinced Chaplin not to cast her. She might have been in the Garden Party Scene, but no evidence exists for this.
to:
** When casting Madame Grosnay, Charlie did think about using Edna Purviance, she did go for a reading but convinced Chaplin not to cast her. She might have been in the Garden Party Scene, but no evidence exists for this.this.
* WorkingTitle: ''The Ladykiller'' and ''A Comedy of Murders''.
* WorkingTitle: ''The Ladykiller'' and ''A Comedy of Murders''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Budget: $2,000,000. Gross USA: $325,000. Cumulative Worldwide Gross: $1,500,000.
to:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Budget: $2,000,000. Gross USA: $325,000. Cumulative Worldwide Gross: $1,500,000.$1,500,000 (Note Chaplin wasn't popular in America at this time).
*WhatCouldHaveBeen: The Film was originally conceived by Creator/OrsonWelles as part of a series based on the real-life Landru, Chaplin instead made this movie and acknowledged Welles as the inspiration.
**Also the film was a lot more racy with dialogue suggesting that Verdoux and Floray are sharing a bed and that the Girl was a prostitute, Censorship removed those ideas.
**When casting Madame Grosnay, Charlie did think about using Edna Purviance, she did go for a reading but convinced Chaplin not to cast her. She might have been in the Garden Party Scene, but no evidence exists for this.
*WhatCouldHaveBeen: The Film was originally conceived by Creator/OrsonWelles as part of a series based on the real-life Landru, Chaplin instead made this movie and acknowledged Welles as the inspiration.
**Also the film was a lot more racy with dialogue suggesting that Verdoux and Floray are sharing a bed and that the Girl was a prostitute, Censorship removed those ideas.
**When casting Madame Grosnay, Charlie did think about using Edna Purviance, she did go for a reading but convinced Chaplin not to cast her. She might have been in the Garden Party Scene, but no evidence exists for this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BoxOfficeBomb: Budget: $2,000,000. Gross USA: $325,000. Cumulative Worldwide Gross: $1,500,000.
