Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Series / SiskelAndEbert

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SoBadItsHorrible: In their review of "Assault of the Killer Bimbos", they make sure to emphasize that even though the high concept title makes it sound like it will be a GuiltyPleasure film, it's not entertaining and not worth seeing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ShownTheirWork: Siskel and Ebert rarely made mistakes during their reviews, and often mentioned screenwriters, cinematographers, and directors by name.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MostAnnoyingSound: A few actors have been described by Siskel and/or Ebert as "fingernails on the blackboard".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MilestoneCelebration: In 1989, the duo hosted a one-hour "500th Anniversary Special".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* GushingAboutShowsYouLike: The purpose of their annual "Best of" episodes. Also arguably the point of their "Memo to the Academy" episodes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ChristmasEpisode: For a while, Siskel and Ebert did an annual "Holiday Gift Guide" episode.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* PunctuatedForEmphasis: In their "Worst of 1994" show, Ebert recalled what he wrote in his Chicago Sun-Times review of ''{{North}}'':
--> '''Ebert''': I ''hated'' this movie! Hated, hated, hated, hated, ''hated'' this movie! ''Hated'' it! Hated every stupid simpering vacant audience-insulting moment of it!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''IndependenceDay'' was given two thumbs down; while it wasn't a resounding critical success, it was a big hit at the box office. They even re-reviewed the film after it became a success, and still disliked it.

to:

** ''IndependenceDay'' was given two thumbs down; while it wasn't a resounding critical success, it was a big hit at the box office. They even re-reviewed the film after it became a success, and still disliked it.it, citing unmemorable characters, cliched dialog, and generic-looking aliens.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LeFilmArtistique: One completely incorrect statement about the duo is that they supposedly give thumbs up only to pretentious artsy foreign films and give thumbs down to all action films. [[SarcasmMode Yeah, they really hated]] ''[[Film/DieHard Die Hard 2]]'', ''ExecutiveDecision'', ''Film/TheFugitive'', ''Film/TerminatorTwoJudgementDay'', ''{{Speed}}'', ''Film/MissionImpossible'', and ''Film/MenInBlack'', among many others.

to:

* LeFilmArtistique: One completely incorrect statement about the duo is that they supposedly give thumbs up only to pretentious artsy foreign films and give thumbs down to all action films. [[SarcasmMode Yeah, they really hated]] ''[[Film/DieHard Die Hard 2]]'', ''ExecutiveDecision'', ''Film/TheFugitive'', ''Film/TerminatorTwoJudgementDay'', ''{{Speed}}'', ''Film/MissionImpossible'', ''UnderSiege 2'', and ''Film/MenInBlack'', among many others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In their review of ''Overboard'', after Goldie Hawn's character pushes Kurt Russell's character (who said he wasn't going anywhere) into the water:

to:

** In their review of ''Overboard'', ''{{Overboard}}'', after Goldie Hawn's character pushes Kurt Russell's character (who said he wasn't going anywhere) into the water:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ebert disliked the 1989 ''{{Film:Batman}}'', which was and is held in high regard. He liked the set design but didn't care about any of the characters and thought the film had a meanness to it.

to:

** Ebert disliked the 1989 ''{{Film:Batman}}'', ''{{Film/Batman}}'', which was and is held in high regard. He liked the set design but didn't care about any of the characters and thought the film had a meanness to it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ebert disliked the 1989 ''{{Batman}}'', which was and is held in high regard. He liked the set design but didn't care about any of the characters and thought the film had a meanness to it.

to:

** Ebert disliked the 1989 ''{{Batman}}'', ''{{Film:Batman}}'', which was and is held in high regard. He liked the set design but didn't care about any of the characters and thought the film had a meanness to it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DudeNotFunny: Ebert accused ''Don't Be a Menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood'' of making fun of serious subjects which he felt shouldn't be mocked. Siskel tried to call him out on it, suggesting that any topic can be parodied if done right.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ebert gave DieHard a thumbs down. It holds a 94% on Rotten Tomatoes. He thought there were too many plot holes and hated the belligerent authority figures.
** Siskel gave GoldenEye a thumbs down. It holds an 80% on Rotten Tomatoes and is regarded by many to be the best of the Pierce Brosnan Bond films and a return to form for the series. Siskel thought it was a routine story, thought the only good action scene was in the first five minutes, and thought Brosnan was a mediocre Bond ("Frankly, Roger Moore has a more commanding screen presence than this guy.")
** While he didn't exactly hate it, Ebert gave a marginal thumbs down to FullMetalJacket, claiming it wasn't on par with Stanley Kubrick's earlier work and finding the second half of the film a letdown. The film has a 97% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
** Ebert also didn't care for BlueVelvet, which holds a 92% on Rotten Tomatoes. He admired the filmmaking, but hated being jerked around by having deadly serious scenes immediately cut to something cheerfully ironic.
** While it doesn't have a high Rotten Tomatoes score, they gave the original HomeAlone, which was a box office smash, two thumbs down.
** Siskel didn't care for TheSilenceOfTheLambs, which has a 96% on Rotten Tomatoes.
** Ebert gave AFewGoodMen thumbs down, claiming it had no surprises and had a sloppy ending. It has an 84% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
** IndependenceDay was given two thumbs down; while it wasn't a resounding critical success, it was a big hit at the box office. They even re-reviewed the film after it became a success, and still disliked it.
** Siskel disliked {{Mulan}}, which has an 86% on Rotten Tomatoes. He thought the artwork was dull, there didn't seem to be a sense of jeopardy regarding the main character, and couldn't remember any of the songs.
** Ebert disliked the 1989 {{Batman}}, which was and is held in high regard. He liked the set design but didn't care about any of the characters and thought the film had a meanness to it.
** Siskel didn't like FerrisBuellersDayOff, which has an 84% on Rotten Tomatoes. He thought all the scenes were done better in other movies.
** The reverse of this trope occurs at times as well; Siskel enjoyed {{Carnosaur}} for its villain and goofy plot. It holds an 11% on Rotten Tomatoes. HomeAlone 3 was also the only one of the HomeAlone films that Ebert enjoyed; it has a 27% on Rotten Tomatoes.

to:

** Ebert gave DieHard ''DieHard'' a thumbs down. It holds a 94% on Rotten Tomatoes. He thought there were too many plot holes and hated the belligerent authority figures.
** Siskel gave GoldenEye ''GoldenEye'' a thumbs down. It holds an 80% on Rotten Tomatoes and is regarded by many to be the best of the Pierce Brosnan Bond films and a return to form for the series. Siskel thought it was a routine story, thought the only good action scene was in the first five minutes, and thought Brosnan was a mediocre Bond ("Frankly, Roger Moore has a more commanding screen presence than this guy.")
** While he didn't exactly hate it, Ebert gave a marginal thumbs down to FullMetalJacket, ''FullMetalJacket'', claiming it wasn't on par with Stanley Kubrick's earlier work and finding the second half of the film a letdown. The film has a 97% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
** Ebert also didn't care for BlueVelvet, ''BlueVelvet'', which holds a 92% on Rotten Tomatoes. He admired the filmmaking, but hated being jerked around by having deadly serious scenes immediately cut to something cheerfully ironic.
** While it doesn't have a high Rotten Tomatoes score, they gave the original HomeAlone, ''HomeAlone'', which was a box office smash, two thumbs down.
** Siskel didn't care for TheSilenceOfTheLambs, ''TheSilenceOfTheLambs'', which has a 96% on Rotten Tomatoes.
** Ebert gave AFewGoodMen ''AFewGoodMen'' thumbs down, claiming it had no surprises and had a sloppy ending. It has an 84% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
** IndependenceDay ''IndependenceDay'' was given two thumbs down; while it wasn't a resounding critical success, it was a big hit at the box office. They even re-reviewed the film after it became a success, and still disliked it.
** Siskel disliked {{Mulan}}, ''{{Mulan}}'', which has an 86% on Rotten Tomatoes. He thought the artwork was dull, there didn't seem to be a sense of jeopardy regarding the main character, and couldn't remember any of the songs.
** Ebert disliked the 1989 {{Batman}}, ''{{Batman}}'', which was and is held in high regard. He liked the set design but didn't care about any of the characters and thought the film had a meanness to it.
** Siskel didn't like FerrisBuellersDayOff, ''FerrisBuellersDayOff'', which has an 84% on Rotten Tomatoes. He thought all the scenes were done better in other movies.
** The reverse of this trope occurs at times as well; Siskel enjoyed {{Carnosaur}} ''{{Carnosaur}}'' for its villain and goofy plot. It holds an 11% on Rotten Tomatoes. HomeAlone 3 ''HomeAlone 3'' was also the only one of the HomeAlone ''HomeAlone'' films that Ebert enjoyed; it has a 27% on Rotten Tomatoes.

Added: 141

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BiasSteamroller: Siskel loved Sean Connery as JamesBond and judge all later Bond movies against Connery's portrayal. He even flat out admitted his bias in his ''GoldenEye'' review:

to:

* BiasSteamroller: Siskel loved Sean Connery as JamesBond and judge judged all later Bond movies against Connery's portrayal. He even flat out admitted his bias in his ''GoldenEye'' review:


Added DiffLines:

** Siskel didn't like FerrisBuellersDayOff, which has an 84% on Rotten Tomatoes. He thought all the scenes were done better in other movies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BiasSteamroller: Siskel loved Sean Connery as JamesBond and judge all later Bond movies against Connery's portrayal. He even flat out admitted his bias in his ''GoldenEye'' review:
--> '''Siskel''': I liked Connery, and everyone else has been ''nothing'' compared to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** When reviewing ''French Twist'', Siskel also broke the fourth wall when he addressed the country of France by talking into the camera:
--> '''Siskel''': You know, the French film industry is saying how "we need protection for our own kind, America is dwarfing us", (looks at camera) so look what you send out to America, here's what you endorse into America. I mean, it's absurd.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Ebert disliked the 1989 {{Batman}}, which was and is held in high regard. He liked the set design but didn't care about any of the characters and thought the film had a meanness to it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Ebert gave DieHard a thumbs down. It holds a 94% on Rotten Tomatoes.
** Siskel gave GoldenEye a thumbs down. It holds an 80% on Rotten Tomatoes and is regarded by many to be the best of the Pierce Brosnan Bond films and a return to form for the series.

to:

** Ebert gave DieHard a thumbs down. It holds a 94% on Rotten Tomatoes.
Tomatoes. He thought there were too many plot holes and hated the belligerent authority figures.
** Siskel gave GoldenEye a thumbs down. It holds an 80% on Rotten Tomatoes and is regarded by many to be the best of the Pierce Brosnan Bond films and a return to form for the series. Siskel thought it was a routine story, thought the only good action scene was in the first five minutes, and thought Brosnan was a mediocre Bond ("Frankly, Roger Moore has a more commanding screen presence than this guy.")
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EightPointEight: Certain films received thumbs down from one or both, despite getting rave reviews from many others. Examples:
** Ebert gave DieHard a thumbs down. It holds a 94% on Rotten Tomatoes.
** Siskel gave GoldenEye a thumbs down. It holds an 80% on Rotten Tomatoes and is regarded by many to be the best of the Pierce Brosnan Bond films and a return to form for the series.
** While he didn't exactly hate it, Ebert gave a marginal thumbs down to FullMetalJacket, claiming it wasn't on par with Stanley Kubrick's earlier work and finding the second half of the film a letdown. The film has a 97% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
** Ebert also didn't care for BlueVelvet, which holds a 92% on Rotten Tomatoes. He admired the filmmaking, but hated being jerked around by having deadly serious scenes immediately cut to something cheerfully ironic.
** While it doesn't have a high Rotten Tomatoes score, they gave the original HomeAlone, which was a box office smash, two thumbs down.
** Siskel didn't care for TheSilenceOfTheLambs, which has a 96% on Rotten Tomatoes.
** Ebert gave AFewGoodMen thumbs down, claiming it had no surprises and had a sloppy ending. It has an 84% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
** IndependenceDay was given two thumbs down; while it wasn't a resounding critical success, it was a big hit at the box office. They even re-reviewed the film after it became a success, and still disliked it.
** Siskel disliked {{Mulan}}, which has an 86% on Rotten Tomatoes. He thought the artwork was dull, there didn't seem to be a sense of jeopardy regarding the main character, and couldn't remember any of the songs.
** The reverse of this trope occurs at times as well; Siskel enjoyed {{Carnosaur}} for its villain and goofy plot. It holds an 11% on Rotten Tomatoes. HomeAlone 3 was also the only one of the HomeAlone films that Ebert enjoyed; it has a 27% on Rotten Tomatoes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GuiltyPleasures: Ebert has been known to give movies thumbs up, even if he admits they're ridiculous and/or not as good of quality as other films. Examples: {{Congo}}, {{Gamera}}: Guardian of the Universe.

to:

* GuiltyPleasures: Ebert has been known to give certain movies thumbs up, even if he admits they're ridiculous and/or not as good of quality as other films. Examples: {{Congo}}, {{Gamera}}: Guardian of the Universe.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* GuiltyPleasures: Ebert has been known to give movies thumbs up, even if he admits they're ridiculous and/or not as good of quality as other films. Examples: {{Congo}}, {{Gamera}}: Guardian of the Universe.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In their review of ''Overboard'', after Goldie Hawn's character pushes Kurt Russell's character (who said he wasn't going anywhere) into the water:
--> '''Siskel''': Isn't ''that'' a surprise? He actually fell overboard, Roger! I bet you didn't know ''that'' was gonna happen, ''noooo''!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* StuffBlowingUp: Frequently cited as a negative in the films they review, as it often emphasizes meaningless special effects over story. For example, in their review of ''On Deadly Ground'':
--> '''Ebert''': Now, if you like to see lots of stuff blowed up real good, this'd be a movie for you, but it doesn't pay to devote close attention to the plot of ''On Deadly Ground''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SarcasmMode: In their review of '''The Great Outdoors''':

to:

* SarcasmMode: In their review of '''The ''The Great Outdoors''':Outdoors'':
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SarcasmMode: In their review of '''The Great Outdoors''':
--> '''Siskel''': The big commodities guy from Chicago just doesn't like nature, and then the average guy, the happy-go-lucky chubby guy, he loves animals. Thanks. We appreciated that.
** In their review of ''Leonard Part 6'':
--> '''Ebert''': (after a clip) And no matter what he fires at it, the door doesn't go down. How funny. The door is still there. How hilarious. How highly, highly humorous.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CatchPhrase: Aside from the quote at the top, there's "Two thumbs up, way up" or "Two thumbs down, way down", in both extreme cases.
** Each episode also opened with either Siskel or Ebert saying some variant of, "(movie title) is one of (four/five) new movies we'll be reviewing this week on ''Siskel and Ebert''. I'm (Gene Siskel/Roger Ebert) of the (Chicago Tribune/Chicago Sun-Times)...", followed by the other saying their name and paper. The latter would then introduce the first film.


Added DiffLines:

* LikeAnOldMarriedCouple: Their arguments could fall into this quite often; the two had been paired together so long that they knew what made the other tick and jumped on that. And while they did argue, they also kidded each other just as much.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* PromotionalConsideration: The sponsors varied, but two companies that often appeared in the "Promotional Consideration" slide were Nestle and Jelly Belly Jelly Beans.


Added DiffLines:

* TitlePlease: No episode titles are present on the screen. Episodes are unofficially referred to as "Week of ____" and/or the movies they reviewed on that episode.
Camacan MOD

Removed: 209

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Second thoughts, that\'s not an example. Never Live It Down is \"A character does something just once, but it becomes the main thing they are known for.\"


* NeverLiveItDown: Siskel was amazed that Ebert gave ''CopAndAHalf'' thumbs up, and ridiculed him for it a few times after the fact, including ''three years later'' during their review of ''Film/BrokenArrow''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Move YMMV entries to YMMV tab.

Top