Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Series / JudgeJudy

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArmorPiercingQuestion: Judge Judy is a master at this. Normally after someone testifies, she will ask one simple question and reduce the person to being speechless or start going into InsaneTrollLogic. One example is where the plaintiff was suing for damages to their car after the defendant damaged the car and for filing false CPS report. The defendant said that she only called after witnessing the plaintiff's smoking marijuana in front of their children, when Judge Judy asked why it took her over a month to call, she couldn't respond. It was in Judge Judy's opinion that [[DisproportionateRetribution the defendant called the day after the plaintiff started to be sued for the damages as payback]].

to:

* ArmorPiercingQuestion: Judge Judy is a master at this. Normally after someone testifies, she will ask one simple question and reduce the person to being speechless or start going into InsaneTrollLogic. One example is where the plaintiff was suing for damages to their car after the defendant damaged the car and for filing false CPS report. The defendant said that she only called after witnessing the plaintiff's plaintiff smoking marijuana in front of their children, when Judge Judy asked why it took her over a month to call, she couldn't respond. It was in Judge Judy's opinion that [[DisproportionateRetribution the defendant called the day after the plaintiff started to be sued for the damages as payback]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




Added DiffLines:

* NotSoAboveItAll: While Judge Judy is very good at keeping her personal feelings out of her judgements, there are times where her personal bias and prejudice works against litigants. In particular, she tends to assume all teenagers are liars, and doesn't seem to think it's possible for someone to use drugs without being an irresponsible deadbeat. This is somewhat warranted given her decades of experience has disproportionately exposed her to people whose families were ruined by drug abuse. Occasionally, she will also rule in favor of someone simply because she felt the opposing litigant made an error in judgement, even if the law was on their side.
** She once ruled in favor of a plaintiff who was suing his former landlord for his security deposit. Said plaintiff openly admitted under questioning that he had caused excessive damage to the space he was renting, however she felt that the defendant's decision not to call the police on the plaintiff for causing the damage was abnormal and thus ruled against him, despite the fact that the lease agreement clearly entitled him to retain the security deposit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheUnfairSex: Averted. Judge Judy is impartial when it comes to genders. As she often says herself, "I am an ecumenical abuser." This particularly shines through in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tpy8NMonHE0 cases]] involving two feuding parents in which the mother has taken some action to prevent the father from seeing the child. Judge Judy is always quick to let the mother know that, under the laws of every state in the Union, mothers have no more inherent rights to their children than fathers do: the child has two parents, who are regarded under the law as equals.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* ExcitedShowTitle: One typically needs to look at electronic program guides to see these, but most of the cases feature excited episode titles, such as: "Internet Romeo Smackdown?!", "One More Reason Not to Live Together!", and "Nine-Year-Old Vandal and Liar?!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EverythingIsRacist: Some litigants (usually defendants, but sometimes plaintiffs as well) claim the only reason they were arrested or cited by law enforcement for some wrongdoing they committed was that they were racially profiled (regardless of whether they were at fault in the incident at hand). Unless they have concrete evidence to back up their claims, Judge Judy won't hear it, because she can't consider a supposition that calls for the operation of someone's mind as evidence.

to:

* EverythingIsRacist: Some litigants (usually defendants, but sometimes plaintiffs as well) claim the only reason they were arrested or cited by law enforcement for some wrongdoing they committed was that they were racially profiled (regardless of whether they were at fault in the incident at hand). Unless they have concrete evidence to back up their claims, Judge Judy won't hear it, because she can't consider a supposition that calls for the operation of someone's mind as evidence. evidence--much like RealLife criminal cases, what matters is ''whether'' the defendant is responsible for the plaintiff's accused damages, not ''why'' they did it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OnTheNext: This was part of most if not all episodes while the show was still in first run, except for reruns from the previous seasons which featured a generic promo. Since the show is no longer in production, the next episode previews have been replaced with generic promos in all episodes, although Jerry Bishop's "...And on the next ''Judge Judy''" remains part of the episode. By contrast, UK airings have often had this segment edited out entirely.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* LukeIMightBeYourFather: A defendant in one case admitted to telling her daughter, who was six at the time, that the plaintiff, whom the girl had known as her father, might ''not'' be and that another man, with whom the mother had been having an affair, might be. She didn't see anything wrong with this because she didn't want to keep secrets from her children. Judge Judy blasted her for this, calling her a moron and a marginal human being for saying such a thing to a six-year-old without having a DaddyDNATest done first. The plaintiff had the test done and found out that he was indeed the girl's father, and was suing for the cost of the test, which he had had to pay for out of his own pocket. He won the case.

Added: 281

Changed: 293

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One case involved a plaintiff who got a tattoo on her leg, resulting in a severe and painful infection. Judge Judy was about to reimburse the plaintiff for medication and for missed work, until the defendant produced a copy of a release the plaintiff had signed acknowledging she was aware of the risks involved and agreed not to hold the defendants liable for any complications resulting from the tattoo. After the plaintiff admitted to signing the release, Judge Judy dismissed her case.

to:

** One case involved a A plaintiff who got had developed an infection in her leg after receiving a tattoo on her leg, resulting in a severe and painful infection. Judge Judy was suing the tattoo artist was about to reimburse the plaintiff be reimbursed for medication and for missed work, work until the defendant produced a copy of a release the plaintiff had signed acknowledging indicating that she was aware of understood the risks involved and agreed not to hold the defendants liable waived compensation for any complications resulting from the tattoo. After the plaintiff admitted to signing she had signed the release, Judge Judy dismissed her case.


Added DiffLines:

** Some litigants read the fine print and sue anyway, believing the circumstances of their case trump the fine print (an example is described above under OffOnATechnicality). Judge Judy usually swiftly dismisses these cases, even if the litigant would have won the case otherwise.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** One case involved a plaintiff who got a tattoo on her leg, resulting in a severe and painful infection. Judge Judy was about to reimburse the plaintiff for medication and for missed work, until the defendant produced a copy of a release the plaintiff had signed acknowledging she was aware of the risks involved and agreed not to hold the defendants liable for any complications resulting from the tattoo. After the plaintiff admitted to signing the release, Judge Judy dismissed her case.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BadassBoast: Judge Judy herself, on occasion.
-->'''Defendant:''' ''[on why he decided to confront the plaintiff, whom he accused of threatening him]'' I don't want anyone to think they could beat me up.\\
'''Judge Judy:''' Well, I wanna tell you something, sir. Byrd could beat you up. And let me tell you something else. Even ''I'' could beat you up. I fight really dirty. ''[audience laughs]''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Sometimes manifested with violence in response to a real or perceived slight. An early case involved a waitress at a Mexican restaurant who was attacked by some customers after she asked them to leave because of their rowdy behavior and because one of them was smoking a cigarette in a non-smoking section. Each side also accused the other of using racial slurs and racist comments (the waitress was white and the defendants were Latina), which the defendants used to justify the attack. Judge Judy pointed out that name-calling did not justify a violent reaction and awarded the plaintiff $2500 for the injuries she sustained.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Another defendant, after Judge Judy told her she'd cooked her own goose by being a smart-aleck in court, snarked back, "I don't ''eat'' goose." Needless to say, she didn't last long before the judge.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DoubleStandardAbuseFemaleOnMale: Absolutely averted. Judge Judy will chastise whoever starts the physical altercation, regardless of their gender. In one case, she had no patience for a plaintiff who sued for a bruised arm sustained after she had already split her ex-boyfriend (the defendant's) lip open.
-->'''Judge Judy:''' Why were ''you'' calling the police if ''you'' were the one who assaulted ''him''?\\
'''Plaintiff:''' He punched me back. Does that mean two wrongs make a right?\\
'''Judge Judy:''' You have no right to put your hands on somebody else. If I were the judge sitting there, I wouldn't have given you a restraining order. I would've shown you the door. You started it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
NLID no longer allows real life examples


Note that the legal disputes on the show were indeed real cases -- similar legal disputes could be found in a typical small claims court. But Sheindlin was not acting as a judge for these cases (though she was a real judge for many years, having passed the New York State bar exam in 1965 and serving for many years in family courts). The show was filmed on a set in Los Angeles, not in a courtroom. The guy in front of her was [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petri_Hawkins-Byrd a former New York City Court Bailiff]], not a police officer. And the "public gallery" was filled by [[MoneyDearBoy paid extras]]. What was actually going on was Sheindlin acting in a legal role as an arbiter, a neutral third-party in a small claims legal dispute. Before the case made it to the show, it was agreed by both parties in the dispute that they would accept Sheindlin's decision as to what would happen going forward. Also, the settlement was paid by the show itself, though Sheindlin had the power to determine how much of the remainder (if any) goes to the litigants themselves. While this may sound like cheap justice, several litigants have found that an appearance on ''Judge Judy'' is enough to [[NeverLiveItDown ruin their reputations forever once word gets out about them]].

to:

Note that the legal disputes on the show were indeed real cases -- similar legal disputes could be found in a typical small claims court. But Sheindlin was not acting as a judge for these cases (though she was a real judge for many years, having passed the New York State bar exam in 1965 and serving for many years in family courts). The show was filmed on a set in Los Angeles, not in a courtroom. The guy in front of her was [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petri_Hawkins-Byrd a former New York City Court Bailiff]], not a police officer. And the "public gallery" was filled by [[MoneyDearBoy paid extras]]. What was actually going on was Sheindlin acting in a legal role as an arbiter, a neutral third-party in a small claims legal dispute. Before the case made it to the show, it was agreed by both parties in the dispute that they would accept Sheindlin's decision as to what would happen going forward. Also, the settlement was paid by the show itself, though Sheindlin had the power to determine how much of the remainder (if any) goes to the litigants themselves. While this may sound like cheap justice, several litigants have found that an appearance on ''Judge Judy'' is enough to [[NeverLiveItDown ruin their reputations forever once word gets out about them]].
them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheDitz: Countless numbers of litigants, both plaintiffs and defendants, have fallen into this category, as Judge Judy herself is wont to point out during their cases:
-->'''Judge Judy:''' The dumbest person who watches this program understands where I'm coming from, sir. And if you don't understand where I'm coming from, then you are dumber than the dumbest person who watches this program.
** In one case, the plaintiff was suing her former friend for damages to her house after the defendant and her family came over to beat up the plaintiff for dating her ex-boyfriend. The plaintiff was granted a restraining order for three years for the defendant and video evidence showed the defendant clearly damaging the house. The defendant kept saying "It wasn't me" over and over again, claiming that it was someone else. It got to the point that Judge Judy kept saying "You're an idiot or lying if you claim it wasn't you".
** Another example is where the plaintiff, while parking, tapped the bumper of his car with the defendant's car. When the plaintiff's witness returned to the car to get some items, he saw the defendant vandalizing the plaintiff's car. The defendant not only posted video of himself vandalizing the car online, but he even bragged about it on Twitter. Judge Judy couldn't believe how stupid the defendant was.
** Litigants who slip up and incriminate themselves regarding actions that they claimed to have not committed. For example, "Dumb and Dumber," who denied stealing the plaintiff's purse, but couldn't keep from interrupting to dispute the plaintiff's list of the purse's contents, [[INeverSaidItWasPoison which he only could have known if he'd stolen the purse]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Judge Judy'' came to an end in 2021 after the end of its 25th season, although CBS is continuing to syndicate reruns and ''Hot Bench'' is continuing with new episodes. The end came amid legal wrangling between Sheindlin and CBS over profits from the sale of her show's catalog to CBS. Sheindlin has moved on to a new show called ''Series/JudyJustice'', which premiered on November 1, 2021 on Amazon's [=IMDb=] TV streaming service. The new show follows a format similar to ''Judge Judy'' with a number of tweaks, including the addition of a law clerk (Sheindlin's own granddaughter, Sarah) and a stenographer, and the replacement of Byrd with a new bailiff, Kevin Rasco, who had been head of security on ''Judge Judy''.

to:

''Judge Judy'' came to an end in 2021 after the end of its 25th season, although CBS is continuing to syndicate reruns and ''Hot Bench'' is continuing with new episodes. The end came amid legal wrangling between Sheindlin and CBS over profits from the sale of her show's catalog to CBS. Sheindlin has moved on to a new show called ''Series/JudyJustice'', which premiered on November 1, 2021 on Amazon's [=IMDb=] TV (now Freevee) streaming service. The new show follows a format similar to ''Judge Judy'' with a number of tweaks, including the addition of a law clerk (Sheindlin's own granddaughter, Sarah) and a stenographer, and the replacement of Byrd with a new bailiff, Kevin Rasco, who had been head of security on ''Judge Judy''. Byrd will return as bailiff on ''Tribunal,'' an upcoming Freevee series announced in April 2022, which will be a semi-remake of ''Hot Bench'' featuring two of that series' former judges as well as Judge Judy's son Adam Levy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MirandaRights: In a very early episode, Judge Judy has said the rights to a defendant who was brought into court with handcuffs & police officers in her courtroom where the plaintiff was pressing criminal charges on the defendant that was base on the civil case. The plaintiff had said the defendant assaulted him and stole his money the night before the case began and was suing for a bad transaction and the money stolen. She told the defendant and his witness these rights before continuing with the case. She also told the plaintiff the same rights when he admitted that he made up the assault to the police as he was angry at the defendant for loosing him $2,400 on a bad transaction.

to:

* MirandaRights: In a very early episode, Judge Judy has said the rights to a defendant who was brought into court with handcuffs & police officers in her courtroom where the plaintiff was pressing criminal charges on the defendant that was base on the civil case. The plaintiff had said the defendant assaulted him and stole his money the night before the case began and was suing for a bad transaction and the money stolen. She told the defendant and his witness these rights before continuing with the case. She also told the plaintiff the same rights when he admitted that he made up the assault to the police as he was angry at the defendant for loosing losing him $2,400 on a bad transaction.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Erika Gebhardt:''' It's not my business, but she had the money to give me. She loaned---\\

to:

'''Erika Gebhardt:''' It's not my business, but she had the money to give me. She loaned---\\loaned--\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EmphasizeEverything: The OpeningNarration is clear about many things. Such as, "(''You'' are about to enter the ''courtroom'' of ''Judge Judith Sheindlin!'') (The ''people'' are ''real''. The ''cases'' are real. The ''rulings'' are ''final''! (This is ''her'' courtroom!) This is ''Judge Judy''!"

to:

* EmphasizeEverything: The OpeningNarration is clear about many things. Such as, "(''You'' are about to enter the ''courtroom'' of ''Judge Judith Sheindlin!'') (The The ''people'' are ''real''. The ''cases'' are real. The ''rulings'' are ''final''! (This is ''her'' courtroom!) This is ''Judge Judy''!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** She uses this for humor quite often.
--->'''Judge Judy:''' I don't care whether you had a 30-day notice, a 3-day notice, or a partridge in a pear tree!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CelebrityCameo: Music/TheSexPistols frontman John "Johnny Rotten" Lydon appeared as a defendant in a very early case, and won. In another, Creator/BeaArthur, a real-life fan of Judge Judy, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzaJnLHmIto appeared as a witness for the defendant]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* YouAreTheNewTrend: Not the first court show, but its success opened the floodgates for dozens of new court shows, including a revival of the original courtroom reality show, ''The People's Court''. This includes several others produced by Big Ticket Television, including ''Judge Joe Brown'', the second season of ''Swift Justice'', and ''Series/HotBench'', which was created by Judge Judy herself.

to:

* YouAreTheNewTrend: Not the first court show, but its success opened the floodgates for dozens of new court shows, including a revival of the original courtroom reality show, ''The People's Court''. This includes several others produced by Big Ticket Television, including ''Judge Joe Brown'', ''Series/JudgeJoeBrown'', the second season of ''Swift Justice'', and ''Series/HotBench'', which was created by Judge Judy herself.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Another early case involved a man who was suing his former dancing partner for falsely alleging that he had sexually molested her, for no other reason than that she wanted to break up the act. The defendant insisted the accusations were true, but Judge Judy pointed out that if the defendant truly felt threatened, she should have broken up the partnership right away, rather than waiting months to do it, and ruled in the plaintiff's favor.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Judge Judy'' came to an end in 2021 after the end of its 25th season, although CBS is continuing to syndicate reruns and ''Hot Bench'' is continuing with new episodes. The end came amid legal wrangling between Sheindlin and CBS over profits from the sale of her show's catalog to CBS. Sheindlin has moved on to a new show called ''Series/JudyJustice'', which premiered on November 1, 2021 on Amazon's [=IMDb=] TV streaming service. The new show follows a format similar to ''Judge Judy'' with a number of tweaks, including the addition of a law clerk (Sheindlin's own granddaughter, Sarah) and a stenographer, and the replacement of Byrd with a new bailiff.

to:

''Judge Judy'' came to an end in 2021 after the end of its 25th season, although CBS is continuing to syndicate reruns and ''Hot Bench'' is continuing with new episodes. The end came amid legal wrangling between Sheindlin and CBS over profits from the sale of her show's catalog to CBS. Sheindlin has moved on to a new show called ''Series/JudyJustice'', which premiered on November 1, 2021 on Amazon's [=IMDb=] TV streaming service. The new show follows a format similar to ''Judge Judy'' with a number of tweaks, including the addition of a law clerk (Sheindlin's own granddaughter, Sarah) and a stenographer, and the replacement of Byrd with a new bailiff.
bailiff, Kevin Rasco, who had been head of security on ''Judge Judy''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ThinkOfTheChildren: Unlike the typical hysterical MoralGuardian example of this trope, Judge Judy is completely in earnest regarding this, especially when dealing with two parents squaring off against each other before him. She will remind them that although they may not like each other anymore, the children they created are the innocent parties, and their first priority should be to the children.

to:

* ThinkOfTheChildren: Unlike the typical hysterical MoralGuardian example of this trope, Judge Judy is completely in earnest regarding this, especially when dealing with two parents squaring off against each other before him.her. She will remind them that although they may not like each other anymore, the children they created are the innocent parties, and their first priority should be to the children.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BecauseISaidSo: Judge Judy invokes this in shutting up some defendants who question her decisions, usually if she's already explained her decision to them but they still don't understand.

to:

* BecauseISaidSo: Judge Judy invokes this in shutting up some defendants litigants who question her decisions, rulings, usually if she's already explained her decision to them but they still don't understand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BecauseISaidSo: Judge Judy invokes this in shutting up some defendants who question her decisions, usually if she's already explained her decision to them but they still don't understand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** A case in 2018 in which the plaintiff had brought a house and put his girlfriend on the deed. When they broke up, she refused to sign over her half of the house. When he went to court, the defendant kept talking over him and going into InsaneTrollLogic over how he would burn her alive and tie her up in a secret basement under the house and kept talking to the plaintiff. Judge Judy had enough and ejected her from court while dismissing her claim. She also had to dismissed the plaintiff's claim as she didn't have the authority to force the defendant to sign over the deed.
*** One case involved a dog rescue group which the plaintiff was a fostering the dog and was promised $50 a week to care for the dog. After two months the group (the defendants) had another person who wanted the foster the dog, but for free, so they offered the plaintiff to buy the dog and wave the adoption fee of $350. When the group sent over the adoption agreement, the plaintiff wanted to take the agreement to her cousin who was an attorney but waited 2 months, then didn't sign the agreement and sued the rescue group for $700 for the money she thought she was owed while the the defendants waited for the signed agreement. When Judge Judy told her she wasn't going to get the money and told her to sign the agreement or give up the dog, she quickly walked out of court and left the dog without saying a word.

to:

*** A case in 2018 in which the plaintiff had brought a house and put his girlfriend on the deed. When they broke up, she refused to sign over her half of the house. When he went to court, the defendant kept talking over him and going into InsaneTrollLogic over how he would burn her alive and tie her up in a secret basement under the house and kept talking to the plaintiff. Judge Judy had enough and ejected her from court while dismissing her claim. She also had to dismissed dismiss the plaintiff's claim as she didn't have the authority to force the defendant to sign over the deed.
*** One case involved a dog rescue group which the plaintiff was a fostering the dog and was promised $50 a week to care for the dog. After two months the group (the defendants) had another person who wanted the foster the dog, but for free, so they offered the plaintiff to buy the dog and wave waive the adoption fee of $350. When the group sent over the adoption agreement, the plaintiff wanted to take the agreement to her cousin who was an attorney but waited 2 months, then didn't sign the agreement and sued the rescue group for $700 for the money she thought she was owed while the the defendants waited for the signed agreement. When Judge Judy told her she wasn't going to get the money and told her to sign the agreement or give up the dog, she quickly walked out of court and left the dog without saying a word.

Added: 284

Changed: 186

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Some cases are cut short because the plaintiff and/or defendant walk out of the court (on their own or Judge Judy throws them out). Typically, the person left wins by default for what they were asking (and their adversary's claim is dismissed) unless the trial got far enough along before the person left that Judge Judy can rule on it:

to:

** Some litigants upset with the judge's ruling refuse to talk to the court reporter in the hall after the verdict. Some cases are cut short because the plaintiff and/or defendant walk out of the court (on their own or Judge Judy throws them out). Typically, the person left wins by default for what they were asking (and their adversary's claim is dismissed) unless the trial got far enough along before the person left that Judge Judy can rule on it:it. Here are some examples:



*** In another memorable case, a plaintiff sued her former husband for a loan. During her questioning, Judge Judy found out that the plaintiff was a deadbeat mom who had not paid child support in years, and chewed her out for it, telling her that if she were a good mother, she'd let the loan go instead of demanding repayment. At this point, the plaintiff cursed under her breath and stormed out of the courtroom through the side door, slamming it loudly. Judge Judy calmly announced that the plaintiff's case was dismissed.

to:

*** In another memorable case, a plaintiff sued her former husband for a loan. During her questioning, Judge Judy found out that the plaintiff was a deadbeat mom who had not paid child support in years, and chewed her out for it, telling her that if she were a good mother, she'd let the loan go instead of demanding repayment. At this point, the plaintiff cursed under her breath and stormed out of the courtroom through the side door, slamming it loudly. Judge Judy calmly announced that dismissed the plaintiff's case was dismissed.case.


Added DiffLines:

* SickEpisode: In one case in which the defendant was about to present a nonsense counterclaim, Judge Judy advised him not to push his luck, as the only reason she wasn't yelling was that she was recovering from a miserable cold and cough and had been on antibiotics for several days.

Top