Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* StockFootage:
** The first episode opens with new footage (and audio clips) from 1983, setting the scene, showing London's homeless, and talking about high unemployment and poverty.
** After Nilsen's arrest some outside scenes use real news footage from the case, including a long-distance view of the real Dennis Nilsen being taken to court by the police, with journalists crowding around the van.
** The first episode opens with new footage (and audio clips) from 1983, setting the scene, showing London's homeless, and talking about high unemployment and poverty.
** After Nilsen's arrest some outside scenes use real news footage from the case, including a long-distance view of the real Dennis Nilsen being taken to court by the police, with journalists crowding around the van.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 48 (click to see context) from:
* DragQueen: In the final episode, Carl Stottor is the second survivor to testify against Nilsen, after the first witness's testimony seems discredited. The defence then try to undermine Stottor's own testimony by revealing his career as a drag queen, hoping this will make him seem unreliable.
to:
* DragQueen: In the final episode, Carl Stottor is the second survivor to testify against Nilsen, added as a witness after the first witness's survivor's testimony seems discredited. The defence then try to undermine Stottor's own testimony by revealing his career as a drag queen, hoping this will make him seem unreliable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No idea if this also happened in real life - it's certainly not in Masters' book's account of the trial
Added DiffLines:
* DragQueen: In the final episode, Carl Stottor is the second survivor to testify against Nilsen, after the first witness's testimony seems discredited. The defence then try to undermine Stottor's own testimony by revealing his career as a drag queen, hoping this will make him seem unreliable.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* AdaptedOut: In real life, three survivors testified against Nilsen at trial. In the dramatisation, Paul Nobbs is never mentioned and there are only two. This is PlayedForDrama, with DCI Jay desperately asking the fragile and vulnerable Carl Stottor to testify after the defence tries to discredit the only other survivor, Douglas Stewart. In reality, Nobbs was scheduled to testify after Stewart and was considered a credible witness -- the jury unanimously found Nilsen guilty of his attempted murder.
to:
* AdaptedOut: In real life, three survivors testified against Nilsen at trial. In the dramatisation, there are only two and Paul Nobbs is never mentioned and there are only two. mentioned. This is PlayedForDrama, with DCI Jay desperately asking the fragile and vulnerable Carl Stottor to testify after the defence tries to discredit undermines the testimony of the only other survivor, Douglas Stewart. In reality, Nobbs was scheduled to testify after Stewart and was considered a credible witness -- the jury unanimously found Nilsen guilty of his attempted murder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27,28 (click to see context) from:
The final episode focuses on the trial itself, following Nilsen's unexpected plea of 'not guilty' to all charges. If the prosecution can't convince the jury that he's legally sane, a "diminished responsibility" defence could free him within 15 years, a possibility that appalls both Jay and Masters.
to:
The final episode focuses on the trial itself, following Nilsen's unexpected plea of 'not guilty' to all charges. If the prosecution can't convince the jury that he's legally sane, a "diminished responsibility" Nilsen's diminished responsibility defence could free him within 15 years, a possibility that appalls both Jay and Masters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27,28 (click to see context) from:
The final episode focuses on the trial itself, following Nilsen's unexpected plea of 'not guilty' to all charges. The prosecution must now prove that he's legally sane, avoiding a "diminished responsibility" defence that could free him within 15 years, a possibility that appalls both Jay and Masters.
to:
The final episode focuses on the trial itself, following Nilsen's unexpected plea of 'not guilty' to all charges. The If the prosecution must now prove can't convince the jury that he's legally sane, avoiding a "diminished responsibility" defence that could free him within 15 years, a possibility that appalls both Jay and Masters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* AdaptedOut: In real life, three survivors testified against Nilsen at trial. In the dramatisation, Paul Nobbs is never mentioned and there are only two. This is PlayedForDrama, with DCI Jay desperately arranging for the fragile and vulnerable Carl Stottor to testify after the defence tries to discredit the only other survivor, Douglas Stewart. In reality, Nobbs was scheduled to testify after Stewart and was considered a credible witness -- the jury unanimously found Nilsen guilty of his attempted murder.
to:
* AdaptedOut: In real life, three survivors testified against Nilsen at trial. In the dramatisation, Paul Nobbs is never mentioned and there are only two. This is PlayedForDrama, with DCI Jay desperately arranging for asking the fragile and vulnerable Carl Stottor to testify after the defence tries to discredit the only other survivor, Douglas Stewart. In reality, Nobbs was scheduled to testify after Stewart and was considered a credible witness -- the jury unanimously found Nilsen guilty of his attempted murder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 41 (click to see context) from:
* CarpetRolledCorpse: During his initial interview, Nilsen mentions wrapping his victims' bodies inside carpet when taking them into the Melrose Avenue garden to burn them. He adds that the burning carpet also helped to mask the smell. The second episode opens with a {{flashback}}, showing him in his garden at night, watching one such fire.
to:
* CarpetRolledCorpse: During his initial interview, Nilsen mentions wrapping his victims' bodies inside carpet when taking them into the Melrose Avenue garden to burn them. He adds that the burning carpet carpet, topped with a car tyre, also helped to mask the smell. The second episode opens with a {{flashback}}, showing him in his garden at night, watching one such fire.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 23,24 (click to see context) from:
In parallel, author Brian Masters takes an interest in the case and starts writing a book about the murders, regularly visiting prison to interview Nilsen. The police, initially unaware of Masters' involvement, are very wary of his motives, and Masters' initial meetings with DCI Jay are tense and unproductive.
to:
In parallel, author Brian Masters takes an interest in the case and starts writing a book about the murders, regularly visiting prison to interview Nilsen. The police, initially unaware of Masters' involvement, are very wary of his motives, and Masters' initial meetings conversations with DCI Jay are tense and unproductive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 46 (click to see context) from:
* {{Dissolve}}: The second episode opens with a {{flashback}} showing Nilsen, at night, watching a fire (disposing of a CarpetRolledCorpse) in his Melrose Avenue garden. It then dissolves to the same garden, by daylight, after his arrest, with the police searching the scene.
to:
* {{Dissolve}}: The second episode opens with a {{flashback}} showing Nilsen, at night, watching a fire (disposing of (containing a CarpetRolledCorpse) in his Melrose Avenue garden. It then dissolves to the same garden, by daylight, after his arrest, with the police searching the scene.
Added DiffLines:
* {{Flashback}}: The second episode opens with the only flashback in the series. It shows Nilsen at night, long before his arrest, silently watching a fire (containing a CarpetRolledCorpse) in his Melrose Avenue garden. The scene then {{dissolve}}s to show the same garden in daylight, after his arrest, with the police searching the scene.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* AdaptedOut: In real life, three survivors testified against Nilsen at trial. In the dramatisation, Paul Nobbs is never mentioned and there are only two. This is PlayedForDrama, with DCI Jay desperately arranging for the fragile and vulnerable Carl Stottor to testify after the defence tries to discredit the only other survivor, Douglas Stewart. In reality, Nobbs was scheduled to testify after after Stewart and was deemed a credible witness -- the jury unanimously found Nilsen guilty of his attempted murder.
to:
* AdaptedOut: In real life, three survivors testified against Nilsen at trial. In the dramatisation, Paul Nobbs is never mentioned and there are only two. This is PlayedForDrama, with DCI Jay desperately arranging for the fragile and vulnerable Carl Stottor to testify after the defence tries to discredit the only other survivor, Douglas Stewart. In reality, Nobbs was scheduled to testify after after Stewart and was deemed considered a credible witness -- the jury unanimously found Nilsen guilty of his attempted murder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* AdaptedOut: In real life, three survivors testified against Nilsen at trial. In the dramatisation, Paul Nobbs is never mentioned and there are only two. This is PlayedForDrama, with DCI Jay desperately arranging for the fragile and vulnerable Carl Stottor to testify after the defence tries to discredit the first witness, Douglas Stewart. In reality, Nobbs was already going to testify after Stewart, he was deemed a credible witness, and the jury unanimously found Nilsen guilty of his attempted murder.
to:
* AdaptedOut: In real life, three survivors testified against Nilsen at trial. In the dramatisation, Paul Nobbs is never mentioned and there are only two. This is PlayedForDrama, with DCI Jay desperately arranging for the fragile and vulnerable Carl Stottor to testify after the defence tries to discredit the first witness, only other survivor, Douglas Stewart. In reality, Nobbs was already going scheduled to testify after Stewart, he after Stewart and was deemed a credible witness, and witness -- the jury unanimously found Nilsen guilty of his attempted murder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 78 (click to see context) from:
* SerialKiller: Nilsen is a serial killer who's murdered over a dozen victims.
to:
* SerialKiller: Nilsen is The {{docudrama}} centres on Dennis Nilsen, a real serial killer who's believed to have murdered over a dozen victims.victims. Nilsen is portrayed as calm and cooperative when arrested, after human remains are discovered in his flat, but becomes increasingly manipulative once he's in custody, seemingly 'forgetting' key details about his victims and crimes when he's interviewed. It's implied that this is so that he can influence the investigation and prosecution, maximising the publicity he gets.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
** In the final scene, Nilsen criticises Masters' title for his book, ''Killing for Company'', saying that it should be called ''Nilsen'' as it's about him. Masters bluntly [[KirkSummation tells him why that's not going to happen]].
to:
** In the final scene, Nilsen criticises Masters' title for his book, ''Killing for Company'', saying that it should be called ''Nilsen'' as it's about him. Masters bluntly [[KirkSummation [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech tells him why that's not going to happen]].
Added DiffLines:
* TheReasonYouSuckSpeech:
** There's a variant when DCI Jay testifies regarding Nilsen's character and sanity, as Nilsen himself is present, but not the main audience for the speech. Jay ends by stating that he's seen prisoners awaiting trial request all sorts of visitors including priests, rabbis and imams. One man even wanted to talk to a shaman. But the only visitor Nilsen wanted to speak to was his biographer. It paints a clear picture of Nilsen's apparent obsession with publicity, and it's implied that it makes an impact on the jury.
** In the final scenes, Nilsen comments that Masters' book, ''Killing for Company'', should really be named after him, as it's his story. Masters, who's previously seemed wary of antagonising Nilsen, bluntly says no and tells him that it's not his book, it's not ''about'' him, and it's been written as a warning about how people like Nilsen come to exist.
--->'''Masters:''' I'm not going to call it Nilsen. This isn't your book. It's not about you. It's about how someone like you came to be.
** There's a variant when DCI Jay testifies regarding Nilsen's character and sanity, as Nilsen himself is present, but not the main audience for the speech. Jay ends by stating that he's seen prisoners awaiting trial request all sorts of visitors including priests, rabbis and imams. One man even wanted to talk to a shaman. But the only visitor Nilsen wanted to speak to was his biographer. It paints a clear picture of Nilsen's apparent obsession with publicity, and it's implied that it makes an impact on the jury.
** In the final scenes, Nilsen comments that Masters' book, ''Killing for Company'', should really be named after him, as it's his story. Masters, who's previously seemed wary of antagonising Nilsen, bluntly says no and tells him that it's not his book, it's not ''about'' him, and it's been written as a warning about how people like Nilsen come to exist.
--->'''Masters:''' I'm not going to call it Nilsen. This isn't your book. It's not about you. It's about how someone like you came to be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 45 (click to see context) from:
* CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot: The lost opportunities that could have stopped Nilsen before he killed so many are bleakly acknowledged at several points. In particular, there's DCI Jay's "How didn't we know?" line and the reaction when Douglas Stewart, who survived a murder attempt years earlier, initially reveals that the police dismissed him and took no action against Nilsen. Journalist Charlotte Proctor, who doesn't know the full details, is far blunter, with a press conference question asking how Nilsen could kill undetected for years.
to:
* CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot: The lost opportunities that could have stopped Nilsen before he killed so many are bleakly acknowledged at several points. In particular, there's DCI Jay's "How didn't we know?" line and the his reaction when Douglas Stewart, who survived a murder attempt years earlier, initially reveals that the police dismissed him and took no action against Nilsen. Journalist Charlotte Proctor, who doesn't know the full details, is far blunter, with a press conference question asking how Nilsen could kill undetected for years.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* AdaptedOut: In real life, three survivors testified against Nilsen at trial. In the adaptation, Paul Nobbs is never mentioned and there are only two. This is PlayedForDrama, with DCI Jay desperately arranging for the fragile and vulnerable Carl Stottor to testify after the defence tries to discredit the first witness, Douglas Stewart. In reality, Nobbs was already going to testify after Stewart, he was deemed a credible witness, and the jury unanimously found Nilsen guilty of his attempted murder.
to:
* AdaptedOut: In real life, three survivors testified against Nilsen at trial. In the adaptation, dramatisation, Paul Nobbs is never mentioned and there are only two. This is PlayedForDrama, with DCI Jay desperately arranging for the fragile and vulnerable Carl Stottor to testify after the defence tries to discredit the first witness, Douglas Stewart. In reality, Nobbs was already going to testify after Stewart, he was deemed a credible witness, and the jury unanimously found Nilsen guilty of his attempted murder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 57 (click to see context) from:
** During the trial, Nilsen's lawyer claims there are inconsistencies in prosecution witness Douglas Stewart's story, then asks if he's sold his story to the newspapers. He has, and the police weren't aware of it, undermining his testimony.
to:
** During the trial, Nilsen's lawyer claims there are inconsistencies in key prosecution witness Douglas Stewart's story, then asks if he's sold his story to the newspapers. He has, and the police weren't aware of it, undermining his testimony.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
!!''Des'' is an dramatisation of real events, so things that might otherwise be treated as spoilers are [[Administrivia/SpoilersOff unmarked]] on this page.
to:
!!''Des'' is an a dramatisation of real events, so things that might otherwise be treated as spoilers are [[Administrivia/SpoilersOff unmarked]] on this page.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Launching from sandbox
Added DiffLines:
%%In line with the usual RealLife troping rules, we are troping Des as a dramatisation of real events, not troping the real people and events it's based on.
%%
%% This also means that real events documented as part of the case don't get spoiler tagging, and that audience tropes like WhamLine don't apply.
!!''Des'' is an dramatisation of real events, so things that might otherwise be treated as spoilers are [[Administrivia/SpoilersOff unmarked]] on this page.
[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/b7e8b5e1_4354_49c4_94c3_1950127e046a.jpeg]]
%%[[caption-width-right:350:some caption text]]
->''"Inspector, how can somebody kill for five years without the police knowing?"''
-->-- '''Charlotte Proctor''', episode one
''Des'' is a British television {{miniseries}}, originally broadcast on Creator/{{ITV}} in 2020. It stars Creator/DavidTennant, Creator/DanielMays and Creator/JasonWatkins. The series is a {{docudrama}} covering the 1983 arrest of a real {{serial killer}}, [[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Nilsen Dennis Nilsen]], played by Tennant, and the events that followed.
The three-part series is written by Luke Neal and Kelly Jones, largely based on the book ''Killing for Company'', written by Brian Masters (played by Watkins in the adaptation). It's directed by Lewis Arnold.
After human remains are found in a blocked drain at a London apartment building, police are called to the scene. Dennis 'Des' Nilsen, one of the residents, is swiftly identified as the likely killer.
As soon as the police access Nilsen's flat, they find evidence of more murders. Nilsen, who calmly surrenders, has been preying on the vulnerable and homeless for years, and claims to have killed more than a dozen men. The series follows the police handling the case, led by DCI Peter Jay (played by Mays), as they try to identify Nilsen's victims and charge him with the murders. Due to the law at the time, Nilsen can only be charged if a victim's name is known. Nilsen, however, claims that he can't remember any names.
Further revelations complicate the investigation - including Nilsen's past career as a police officer, previous reports about him that weren't taken seriously, and a connection to a politically sensitive missing persons case.
In parallel, author Brian Masters takes an interest in the case and starts writing a book about the murders, regularly visiting prison to interview Nilsen. The police, initially unaware of Masters' involvement, are very wary of his motives, and Masters' initial meetings with DCI Jay are tense and unproductive.
Tennant's portrayal of Nilsen himself bridges both narrative strands, with his initial calm and casual demeanour gradually eroding to reveal an unrepentant and manipulative killer, a man fascinated by his own fame.
The final episode focuses on the trial itself, following Nilsen's unexpected plea of 'not guilty' to all charges. The prosecution must now prove that he's legally sane, avoiding a "diminished responsibility" defence that could free him within 15 years, a possibility that appalls both Jay and Masters.
The first episode aired on September 14, 2020.
----
!!''Des'' contains examples of the following tropes:
* AccentInterest: When Nilsen first meets Brian Masters, he reacts to his fairly upper-class accent, saying that he knows where Masters is from and that he's probably a Tory. He's initially unconvinced when Masters replies that he was actually raised on the Old Kent Road (in Southwick, a relatively poor area of London).
-->'''Masters:''' You hear my accent and you assume that you know everything about me.
* AdaptedOut: In real life, three survivors testified against Nilsen at trial. In the adaptation, Paul Nobbs is never mentioned and there are only two. This is PlayedForDrama, with DCI Jay desperately arranging for the fragile and vulnerable Carl Stottor to testify after the defence tries to discredit the first witness, Douglas Stewart. In reality, Nobbs was already going to testify after Stewart, he was deemed a credible witness, and the jury unanimously found Nilsen guilty of his attempted murder.
* ArmorPiercingQuestion:
** After Nilsen pleads not guilty he speaks to Masters, claiming that none of the murders were intentional, as he wasn't in his right mind and had diminished responsibility. Masters immediately asks why, in that case, he didn't contact the police after the first death.
** When Jay and Masters meet after the trial starts, Jay states that, if the diminished responsibility defence succeeds, Nilsen could be deemed "cured", released and free to kill again in fifteen years. Jay says he can't live with that, and asks if Masters can. There's a moment of bleak silence, then Masters agrees to hand over the notebooks that might discredit that defence.
* ArmorPiercingResponse: After Nilsen pleads not guilty, Masters challenges him over the way the press will exploit the story for profit, able to report every word said in court. Nilsen points out that, as his biographer, Masters is much the same.
-->'''Masters:''' I'm not exploiting these young men's tragedies to sell newspapers.
-->'''Nilsen:''' No, you're just exploiting me.
* CarpetRolledCorpse: During his initial interview, Nilsen mentions wrapping his victims' bodies inside carpet when taking them into the Melrose Avenue garden to burn them. He adds that the burning carpet also helped to mask the smell. The second episode opens with a {{flashback}}, showing him in his garden at night, watching one such fire.
* CharacterTitle:
** ''"Des"'' refers to Dennis Nilsen himself, who doesn't use his full name.
** In the final scene, Nilsen criticises Masters' title for his book, ''Killing for Company'', saying that it should be called ''Nilsen'' as it's about him. Masters bluntly [[KirkSummation tells him why that's not going to happen]].
* CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot: The lost opportunities that could have stopped Nilsen before he killed so many are bleakly acknowledged at several points. In particular, there's DCI Jay's "How didn't we know?" line and the reaction when Douglas Stewart, who survived a murder attempt years earlier, initially reveals that the police dismissed him and took no action against Nilsen. Journalist Charlotte Proctor, who doesn't know the full details, is far blunter, with a press conference question asking how Nilsen could kill undetected for years.
* {{Dissolve}}: The second episode opens with a {{flashback}} showing Nilsen, at night, watching a fire (disposing of a CarpetRolledCorpse) in his Melrose Avenue garden. It then dissolves to the same garden, by daylight, after his arrest, with the police searching the scene.
* {{Docudrama}}: The miniseries dramatises events following the 1983 arrest of [[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Nilsen Dennis Nilsen]], a real Scottish {{serial killer}}, who's played by Creator/DavidTennant. It doesn't attempt to show Nilsen's crimes themselves, only the aftermath.
* DrivenToSuicide: During the final episode, forensic psychiatrist Dr Hardy testifies during the trial. As part of the defence's claim that Nilsen is insane, his barrister points out that his pre-trial behaviour was considered so extreme and erratic that Dr Hardy recorded him as a suicide risk.
* DroppingTheBombshell:
** Early in the first episode, immediately after his arrest, Nilsen's asked if there were actually two victims. He replies that there were many more than that. It's followed by shocked silence.
--->'''DI [=McCusker=]:''' So, are we talking about one body or two?
--->'''Nilsen:''' ''[pauses for a moment]'' Fifteen or sixteen... [-I think-]
--->''[Silence from DI [=McCusker=] and DCI Jay]''
** Midway through the first episode, [=McCusker=] arrives late to a meeting, drops a file on the table, and announces that Nilsen used to be a policeman.
** Late in the first episode, DCI Jay interviews Douglas Stewart, who says that he was nearly murdered by Nilsen three years ago. Jay asks why Stewart didn't report it to the police... and the reply is that he ''did'', but they took no action.
** The second episode ends at the start of Nilsen's trial. Despite all the evidence, and his own confessions, he unexpectedly pleads "not guilty" to all charges, suddenly forcing a full trial. Masters and Jay are both visibly shocked.
** During the trial, Nilsen's lawyer claims there are inconsistencies in prosecution witness Douglas Stewart's story, then asks if he's sold his story to the newspapers. He has, and the police weren't aware of it, undermining his testimony.
* FalseConfession: When DCI Jay visits Nilsen in prison, he confesses to killing Kenneth Ockenden, a Canadian student whose family had political connections, whose disappearance made headlines several years earlier. Chambers is furious when Jay tries to reopen the case, assuming Nilsen is lying for publicity. It's later revealed that Ockenden really was a victim.
-->'''DCI Jay:''' Nilsen says he killed him, Guv
-->'''DSI Chambers:''' ''Of course he did''. He'd say anything to stay in the papers. Ockenden doesn't fit the victim profile, Peter. He wasn't homeless or an addict. He wasn't even gay.
* FauxAffablyEvil: Nilsen is portrayed as calm and casual in his initial conversations with the police. When Masters first visits him in prison and mentions the wrong number of victims, though, he's suddenly raising his voice and swearing. He becomes increasingly angry and manipulative as events progress.
* FreudianExcuse: Nilsen tells Brian Masters that seeing the body of his grandfather, a fisherman killed at sea, led to his actions. Masters isn't buying it, and immediately says so.
-->'''Nilsen:''' My grandfather, my great hero and protector, was the only person that I ever loved. Seeing my grandfather in that box... all my troubles started there. See, it blighted my personality permanently. That's why I did all these things.
* IdentifyingTheBody: Elizabeth Sinclair initially wants to identify her son Stephen's body, to be sure that it's really him. [=McCusker=] and Jay explain that Stephen's already been identified, and then, without mentioning the condition of the body, successfully persuade her that she doesn't want to see him like this.
* ManipulativeBastard: Nilsen is portrayed as carefully, coldly manipulative. At various points it's called out that he's only told the police exactly what he wants to tell them, and many of his actions seem designed to keep himself in the spotlight. When he unexpectedly pleads not guilty in court, the police suddenly realise that in all their interviews, he's avoided saying anything that would undermine his insanity defence by confirming he planned the murders. In another scene, DCI Jay points out that Nilsen himself reported the blocked drains that led to his arrest, raising the subject in a way that seems to wonder if it was deliberate.
* MediaScrum: The police are wary of getting caught up in a crowd of reporters and are initially able to keep them at a distance while moving Nilsen from the station. Later, when Nilsen's committed to trial, reporters do manage to crowd around the police van, pressing cameras up against the windows.
* {{Montages}}:
** The first episode opens with a montage of news footage, showing London's drifters and homeless and establishing the 1983 setting. An audio clip of UsefulNotes/MargaretThatcher talking about high unemployment reinforces it.
** The second episode cuts from scenes of a forensic science team searching the Melrose Avenue garden to a montage of lab scenes as bones and remains are processed.
* MugshotMontage: Immediately after Nilsen's arrest, while in a police car, he confirms [[DroppingTheBombshell how many bodies there are]]. The scene then cuts from DCI Jay's shock to a montage of Nilsen's mugshots and fingerprinting.
* NothingIsScarier: After his arrest, Nilsen talks about disposing of his victims' bodies and casually mentions "boiling heads". When DCI Jay returns to Nilsen's Cranley Gardens flat, he sees a huge pot on the stove. Jay walks towards it, the soundtrack starts to build up the tension... and he's warned off by a colleague before he can actually look at it.
* PenPals: While Nilsen's awaiting trial, he starts a correspondence with Brian Masters. Each of them has their own motives for writing to the other. Masters hopes to write a book, whereas it gradually becomes clear that Nilsen loves the attention.
* SelfDisposingVillain: In the second episode, after the investigation is halted, DCI Jay tells [=McCusker=] that it was Nilsen himself who reported the blocked drains at Cranley Gardens, something which directly led to his own arrest. However, by this point Jay is well aware of the way Nilsen craves attention, and it's implied that he's wondering if the arrest was what Nilsen wanted.
* SerialKiller: Nilsen is a serial killer who's murdered over a dozen victims.
* ShoutOut: At the start of the final episode, after pleading not guilty, Nilsen is shown quoting ''Literature/DonQuixote'' in his conversation with Masters, while explaining why he doesn't accept responsibility for the murders he committed.
* TalkingToTheDead: In the final episode, during the court case, Nilsen's barrister mentions him watching TV alongside the bodies of his victims, conversing with them as if they were alive. It's part of a defence claim that he's not guilty of murder, only manslaughter, due to his state of mind.
* TheShowOfTheBooks: The series is based on Brian Masters' book ''Killing For Company'', and Masters himself (played by Creator/JasonWatkins) is one of the main characters in the dramatisation. The book itself is discussed in the final scenes.
* ThousandYardStare: In the first episode DCI Jay stands across the street and watches, unmoving and unblinking, as the press photograph the group of police officers bringing bagged human remains out of Nilsen's Cranley Gardens flat.
----
->''"How didn't we know?"''
-->-- '''DCI Peter Jay''', episode one
%%
%% This also means that real events documented as part of the case don't get spoiler tagging, and that audience tropes like WhamLine don't apply.
!!''Des'' is an dramatisation of real events, so things that might otherwise be treated as spoilers are [[Administrivia/SpoilersOff unmarked]] on this page.
[[quoteright:350:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/b7e8b5e1_4354_49c4_94c3_1950127e046a.jpeg]]
%%[[caption-width-right:350:some caption text]]
->''"Inspector, how can somebody kill for five years without the police knowing?"''
-->-- '''Charlotte Proctor''', episode one
''Des'' is a British television {{miniseries}}, originally broadcast on Creator/{{ITV}} in 2020. It stars Creator/DavidTennant, Creator/DanielMays and Creator/JasonWatkins. The series is a {{docudrama}} covering the 1983 arrest of a real {{serial killer}}, [[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Nilsen Dennis Nilsen]], played by Tennant, and the events that followed.
The three-part series is written by Luke Neal and Kelly Jones, largely based on the book ''Killing for Company'', written by Brian Masters (played by Watkins in the adaptation). It's directed by Lewis Arnold.
After human remains are found in a blocked drain at a London apartment building, police are called to the scene. Dennis 'Des' Nilsen, one of the residents, is swiftly identified as the likely killer.
As soon as the police access Nilsen's flat, they find evidence of more murders. Nilsen, who calmly surrenders, has been preying on the vulnerable and homeless for years, and claims to have killed more than a dozen men. The series follows the police handling the case, led by DCI Peter Jay (played by Mays), as they try to identify Nilsen's victims and charge him with the murders. Due to the law at the time, Nilsen can only be charged if a victim's name is known. Nilsen, however, claims that he can't remember any names.
Further revelations complicate the investigation - including Nilsen's past career as a police officer, previous reports about him that weren't taken seriously, and a connection to a politically sensitive missing persons case.
In parallel, author Brian Masters takes an interest in the case and starts writing a book about the murders, regularly visiting prison to interview Nilsen. The police, initially unaware of Masters' involvement, are very wary of his motives, and Masters' initial meetings with DCI Jay are tense and unproductive.
Tennant's portrayal of Nilsen himself bridges both narrative strands, with his initial calm and casual demeanour gradually eroding to reveal an unrepentant and manipulative killer, a man fascinated by his own fame.
The final episode focuses on the trial itself, following Nilsen's unexpected plea of 'not guilty' to all charges. The prosecution must now prove that he's legally sane, avoiding a "diminished responsibility" defence that could free him within 15 years, a possibility that appalls both Jay and Masters.
The first episode aired on September 14, 2020.
----
!!''Des'' contains examples of the following tropes:
* AccentInterest: When Nilsen first meets Brian Masters, he reacts to his fairly upper-class accent, saying that he knows where Masters is from and that he's probably a Tory. He's initially unconvinced when Masters replies that he was actually raised on the Old Kent Road (in Southwick, a relatively poor area of London).
-->'''Masters:''' You hear my accent and you assume that you know everything about me.
* AdaptedOut: In real life, three survivors testified against Nilsen at trial. In the adaptation, Paul Nobbs is never mentioned and there are only two. This is PlayedForDrama, with DCI Jay desperately arranging for the fragile and vulnerable Carl Stottor to testify after the defence tries to discredit the first witness, Douglas Stewart. In reality, Nobbs was already going to testify after Stewart, he was deemed a credible witness, and the jury unanimously found Nilsen guilty of his attempted murder.
* ArmorPiercingQuestion:
** After Nilsen pleads not guilty he speaks to Masters, claiming that none of the murders were intentional, as he wasn't in his right mind and had diminished responsibility. Masters immediately asks why, in that case, he didn't contact the police after the first death.
** When Jay and Masters meet after the trial starts, Jay states that, if the diminished responsibility defence succeeds, Nilsen could be deemed "cured", released and free to kill again in fifteen years. Jay says he can't live with that, and asks if Masters can. There's a moment of bleak silence, then Masters agrees to hand over the notebooks that might discredit that defence.
* ArmorPiercingResponse: After Nilsen pleads not guilty, Masters challenges him over the way the press will exploit the story for profit, able to report every word said in court. Nilsen points out that, as his biographer, Masters is much the same.
-->'''Masters:''' I'm not exploiting these young men's tragedies to sell newspapers.
-->'''Nilsen:''' No, you're just exploiting me.
* CarpetRolledCorpse: During his initial interview, Nilsen mentions wrapping his victims' bodies inside carpet when taking them into the Melrose Avenue garden to burn them. He adds that the burning carpet also helped to mask the smell. The second episode opens with a {{flashback}}, showing him in his garden at night, watching one such fire.
* CharacterTitle:
** ''"Des"'' refers to Dennis Nilsen himself, who doesn't use his full name.
** In the final scene, Nilsen criticises Masters' title for his book, ''Killing for Company'', saying that it should be called ''Nilsen'' as it's about him. Masters bluntly [[KirkSummation tells him why that's not going to happen]].
* CouldHaveAvoidedThisPlot: The lost opportunities that could have stopped Nilsen before he killed so many are bleakly acknowledged at several points. In particular, there's DCI Jay's "How didn't we know?" line and the reaction when Douglas Stewart, who survived a murder attempt years earlier, initially reveals that the police dismissed him and took no action against Nilsen. Journalist Charlotte Proctor, who doesn't know the full details, is far blunter, with a press conference question asking how Nilsen could kill undetected for years.
* {{Dissolve}}: The second episode opens with a {{flashback}} showing Nilsen, at night, watching a fire (disposing of a CarpetRolledCorpse) in his Melrose Avenue garden. It then dissolves to the same garden, by daylight, after his arrest, with the police searching the scene.
* {{Docudrama}}: The miniseries dramatises events following the 1983 arrest of [[https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Nilsen Dennis Nilsen]], a real Scottish {{serial killer}}, who's played by Creator/DavidTennant. It doesn't attempt to show Nilsen's crimes themselves, only the aftermath.
* DrivenToSuicide: During the final episode, forensic psychiatrist Dr Hardy testifies during the trial. As part of the defence's claim that Nilsen is insane, his barrister points out that his pre-trial behaviour was considered so extreme and erratic that Dr Hardy recorded him as a suicide risk.
* DroppingTheBombshell:
** Early in the first episode, immediately after his arrest, Nilsen's asked if there were actually two victims. He replies that there were many more than that. It's followed by shocked silence.
--->'''DI [=McCusker=]:''' So, are we talking about one body or two?
--->'''Nilsen:''' ''[pauses for a moment]'' Fifteen or sixteen... [-I think-]
--->''[Silence from DI [=McCusker=] and DCI Jay]''
** Midway through the first episode, [=McCusker=] arrives late to a meeting, drops a file on the table, and announces that Nilsen used to be a policeman.
** Late in the first episode, DCI Jay interviews Douglas Stewart, who says that he was nearly murdered by Nilsen three years ago. Jay asks why Stewart didn't report it to the police... and the reply is that he ''did'', but they took no action.
** The second episode ends at the start of Nilsen's trial. Despite all the evidence, and his own confessions, he unexpectedly pleads "not guilty" to all charges, suddenly forcing a full trial. Masters and Jay are both visibly shocked.
** During the trial, Nilsen's lawyer claims there are inconsistencies in prosecution witness Douglas Stewart's story, then asks if he's sold his story to the newspapers. He has, and the police weren't aware of it, undermining his testimony.
* FalseConfession: When DCI Jay visits Nilsen in prison, he confesses to killing Kenneth Ockenden, a Canadian student whose family had political connections, whose disappearance made headlines several years earlier. Chambers is furious when Jay tries to reopen the case, assuming Nilsen is lying for publicity. It's later revealed that Ockenden really was a victim.
-->'''DCI Jay:''' Nilsen says he killed him, Guv
-->'''DSI Chambers:''' ''Of course he did''. He'd say anything to stay in the papers. Ockenden doesn't fit the victim profile, Peter. He wasn't homeless or an addict. He wasn't even gay.
* FauxAffablyEvil: Nilsen is portrayed as calm and casual in his initial conversations with the police. When Masters first visits him in prison and mentions the wrong number of victims, though, he's suddenly raising his voice and swearing. He becomes increasingly angry and manipulative as events progress.
* FreudianExcuse: Nilsen tells Brian Masters that seeing the body of his grandfather, a fisherman killed at sea, led to his actions. Masters isn't buying it, and immediately says so.
-->'''Nilsen:''' My grandfather, my great hero and protector, was the only person that I ever loved. Seeing my grandfather in that box... all my troubles started there. See, it blighted my personality permanently. That's why I did all these things.
* IdentifyingTheBody: Elizabeth Sinclair initially wants to identify her son Stephen's body, to be sure that it's really him. [=McCusker=] and Jay explain that Stephen's already been identified, and then, without mentioning the condition of the body, successfully persuade her that she doesn't want to see him like this.
* ManipulativeBastard: Nilsen is portrayed as carefully, coldly manipulative. At various points it's called out that he's only told the police exactly what he wants to tell them, and many of his actions seem designed to keep himself in the spotlight. When he unexpectedly pleads not guilty in court, the police suddenly realise that in all their interviews, he's avoided saying anything that would undermine his insanity defence by confirming he planned the murders. In another scene, DCI Jay points out that Nilsen himself reported the blocked drains that led to his arrest, raising the subject in a way that seems to wonder if it was deliberate.
* MediaScrum: The police are wary of getting caught up in a crowd of reporters and are initially able to keep them at a distance while moving Nilsen from the station. Later, when Nilsen's committed to trial, reporters do manage to crowd around the police van, pressing cameras up against the windows.
* {{Montages}}:
** The first episode opens with a montage of news footage, showing London's drifters and homeless and establishing the 1983 setting. An audio clip of UsefulNotes/MargaretThatcher talking about high unemployment reinforces it.
** The second episode cuts from scenes of a forensic science team searching the Melrose Avenue garden to a montage of lab scenes as bones and remains are processed.
* MugshotMontage: Immediately after Nilsen's arrest, while in a police car, he confirms [[DroppingTheBombshell how many bodies there are]]. The scene then cuts from DCI Jay's shock to a montage of Nilsen's mugshots and fingerprinting.
* NothingIsScarier: After his arrest, Nilsen talks about disposing of his victims' bodies and casually mentions "boiling heads". When DCI Jay returns to Nilsen's Cranley Gardens flat, he sees a huge pot on the stove. Jay walks towards it, the soundtrack starts to build up the tension... and he's warned off by a colleague before he can actually look at it.
* PenPals: While Nilsen's awaiting trial, he starts a correspondence with Brian Masters. Each of them has their own motives for writing to the other. Masters hopes to write a book, whereas it gradually becomes clear that Nilsen loves the attention.
* SelfDisposingVillain: In the second episode, after the investigation is halted, DCI Jay tells [=McCusker=] that it was Nilsen himself who reported the blocked drains at Cranley Gardens, something which directly led to his own arrest. However, by this point Jay is well aware of the way Nilsen craves attention, and it's implied that he's wondering if the arrest was what Nilsen wanted.
* SerialKiller: Nilsen is a serial killer who's murdered over a dozen victims.
* ShoutOut: At the start of the final episode, after pleading not guilty, Nilsen is shown quoting ''Literature/DonQuixote'' in his conversation with Masters, while explaining why he doesn't accept responsibility for the murders he committed.
* TalkingToTheDead: In the final episode, during the court case, Nilsen's barrister mentions him watching TV alongside the bodies of his victims, conversing with them as if they were alive. It's part of a defence claim that he's not guilty of murder, only manslaughter, due to his state of mind.
* TheShowOfTheBooks: The series is based on Brian Masters' book ''Killing For Company'', and Masters himself (played by Creator/JasonWatkins) is one of the main characters in the dramatisation. The book itself is discussed in the final scenes.
* ThousandYardStare: In the first episode DCI Jay stands across the street and watches, unmoving and unblinking, as the press photograph the group of police officers bringing bagged human remains out of Nilsen's Cranley Gardens flat.
----
->''"How didn't we know?"''
-->-- '''DCI Peter Jay''', episode one
