Follow TV Tropes

Following

History ScrewedByTheLawyers / ComicBooks

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In 2010, Ken Penders, former head writer for the series, filed copyright claims for all of his characters and creations in an attempt to [[MoneyDearBoy gain royalties for their use]], prompting Archie Comics to file a lawsuit against him and take him to court to disprove his claims. While things didn't seem all that bad at first, the case began to swing in Penders' favor when it became clear that Archie could not prove their ownership of the properties in question, mostly due to having somehow misplaced a lot of paperwork including Penders' original contract, and caused so many delays in court that the judge threatened to throw the case out, which would give Penders the victory by default.[[note]]The exact details are unknown, but Penders proclaims that the original contracts were destroyed -- how they were is disputed; one account suggests fire, another a careless intern destroyed them.[[/note]] In a panic, Archie decided to remove all of Penders' creations from the comic while it was in the middle of a story arc that centered around them, throwing the plot completely out of whack and making fans (and the creative staff) livid. In the end, the two sides settled, and though Penders stated that Archie could be allowed to use his creations anyway, the conditions he put up for that didn't sit well with Archie and they instead decided to perform a soft reboot for the series via a CosmicRetcon at the end of ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogMegaManWorldsCollide''. The character removals also extended to all creators whose names were not Sega, [=DiC=] or Ian Flynn. Conversely, when it comes to Penders himself, the whole affair can best be described as bit of a PyrrhicVictory for him. While he might have the rights to the names of and some concepts related to the characters he created, he can in most cases not really put them to any use without making heavy alterations to their design as they in their original form would be highly derivative of Sega's property and could therefore easily place him on the receiving end of this trope. Not to mention that, regardless of his motivations, Penders' actions and their consequences made him a pariah in the fandom.

to:

** In 2010, Ken Penders, former head writer for the series, filed copyright claims for all of his characters and creations in an attempt to [[MoneyDearBoy gain royalties for their use]], creations, prompting Archie Comics to file a lawsuit against him and take him to court to disprove his claims. While things didn't seem all that bad at first, the The case began to swing swung in Penders' favor when it became clear that Archie could not prove their ownership of the properties in question, mostly due to having somehow misplaced a lot of paperwork including Penders' original contract, and caused so many delays in court that the judge threatened to throw the case out, which would give Penders the victory by default.[[note]]The exact details are unknown, but Penders proclaims that the original contracts were destroyed -- how question nor could they were is disputed; one account suggests fire, another prove their writers signed a careless intern destroyed them.[[/note]] contract granting Archie and Sega legal ownership of characters created for the comic. In a panic, Archie decided to remove all of Penders' creations from the comic while it was in the middle of a story arc that centered around them, throwing the plot completely out of whack and making fans (and the creative staff) livid. In the end, the two sides settled, and though Penders stated that Archie could be allowed to use his creations anyway, and reprint his stories anyway if they paid royalties, the conditions he put up for that didn't sit well with Archie and they instead decided to perform a soft reboot for the series via a CosmicRetcon at the end of ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogMegaManWorldsCollide''. The character removals also extended to all creators whose names were not Sega, [=DiC=] or Ian Flynn.Flynn due to the aforementioned inability of Archie to prove they made the creators sign a contract over story and character ownership. Conversely, when it comes to Penders himself, the whole affair can best be described as bit of a PyrrhicVictory for him. While he might have the rights to the names of and some concepts related to the characters he created, he can in most cases not really put them to any use without making heavy alterations to their design as they in their original form would be highly derivative of Sega's property and could therefore easily place him on the receiving end of this trope. Not to mention that, regardless of his motivations, Penders' actions and their consequences made him a pariah in the Sonic fandom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In 2010, Ken Penders, former head writer for the series, filed copyright claims for all of his characters and creations in an attempt to [[MoneyDearBoy gain royalties for their use]], promoting Archie Comics to file a lawsuit against him and take him to court to disprove his claims. While things didn't seem all that bad at first, the case began to swing in Penders' favor when it became clear that Archie could not prove their ownership of the properties in question, mostly due to having somehow misplaced a lot of paperwork including Penders' original contract, and caused so many delays in court that the judge threatened to throw the case out, which would give Penders the victory by default.[[note]]The exact details are unknown, but Penders proclaims that the original contracts were destroyed -- how they were is disputed; one account suggests fire, another a careless intern destroyed them.[[/note]] In a panic, Archie decided to remove all of Penders' creations from the comic while it was in the middle of a story arc that centered around them, throwing the plot completely out of whack and making fans (and the creative staff) livid. In the end, the two sides settled, and though Penders stated that Archie could be allowed to use his creations anyway, the conditions he put up for that didn't sit well with Archie and they instead decided to perform a soft reboot for the series via a CosmicRetcon at the end of ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogMegaManWorldsCollide''. The character removals also extended to all creators whose names were not Sega, [=DiC=] or Ian Flynn. Conversely, when it comes to Penders himself, the whole affair can best be described as bit of a PyrrhicVictory for him. While he might have the rights to the names of and some concepts related to the characters he created, he can in most cases not really put them to any use without making heavy alterations to their design as they in their original form would be highly derivative of Sega's property and could therefore easily place him on the receiving end of this trope. Not to mention that, regardless of his motivations, Penders' actions and their consequences made him a pariah in the fandom.

to:

** In 2010, Ken Penders, former head writer for the series, filed copyright claims for all of his characters and creations in an attempt to [[MoneyDearBoy gain royalties for their use]], promoting prompting Archie Comics to file a lawsuit against him and take him to court to disprove his claims. While things didn't seem all that bad at first, the case began to swing in Penders' favor when it became clear that Archie could not prove their ownership of the properties in question, mostly due to having somehow misplaced a lot of paperwork including Penders' original contract, and caused so many delays in court that the judge threatened to throw the case out, which would give Penders the victory by default.[[note]]The exact details are unknown, but Penders proclaims that the original contracts were destroyed -- how they were is disputed; one account suggests fire, another a careless intern destroyed them.[[/note]] In a panic, Archie decided to remove all of Penders' creations from the comic while it was in the middle of a story arc that centered around them, throwing the plot completely out of whack and making fans (and the creative staff) livid. In the end, the two sides settled, and though Penders stated that Archie could be allowed to use his creations anyway, the conditions he put up for that didn't sit well with Archie and they instead decided to perform a soft reboot for the series via a CosmicRetcon at the end of ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogMegaManWorldsCollide''. The character removals also extended to all creators whose names were not Sega, [=DiC=] or Ian Flynn. Conversely, when it comes to Penders himself, the whole affair can best be described as bit of a PyrrhicVictory for him. While he might have the rights to the names of and some concepts related to the characters he created, he can in most cases not really put them to any use without making heavy alterations to their design as they in their original form would be highly derivative of Sega's property and could therefore easily place him on the receiving end of this trope. Not to mention that, regardless of his motivations, Penders' actions and their consequences made him a pariah in the fandom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
That's not what "in favor of" means.


* Whoo, boy. ComicBook/XMen and ComicBook/FantasticFour was screwed by this trope between 2015 and 2019. Around 2015, Creator/{{Disney}} and Creator/MarvelComics was angry at Creator/TwentiethCenturyFox for its iron grip on the Fantastic Four movie rights and the mess that was ''Film/FantasticFour2015''. To absolutely deny Fox any sort of promotion (and to spite themselves in the process), Marvel went full denial towards the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, removing them from cartoons and games, cancelling the Fantastic Four's comic and trying to raise the popularity of the similar-looking group ComicBook/TheInhumans in favor of the X-Men. Tensions would cool when Fox had a changing of the guard and ''Film/{{Deadpool|2016}}'' ended up becoming the biggest R-Rated movie in history with Disney's acquisition of Fox allowing both teams to return to media in full force. Despite Marvel owning rights to just about every other media type to the character, fans are fearful that this will be repeated concerning ComicBook/SpiderMan after talks broke down between Disney and Sony, leading Spidey to be nearly jettisoned out of the Marvel Cinematic Universe until finally deciding to give him another film (what happens afterwards is currently unknown).

to:

* Whoo, boy. ComicBook/XMen and ComicBook/FantasticFour was screwed by this trope between 2015 and 2019. Around 2015, Creator/{{Disney}} and Creator/MarvelComics was angry at Creator/TwentiethCenturyFox for its iron grip on the Fantastic Four movie rights and the mess that was ''Film/FantasticFour2015''. To absolutely deny Fox any sort of promotion (and to spite themselves in the process), Marvel went full denial towards the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, removing them from cartoons and games, cancelling the Fantastic Four's comic and trying to raise the popularity of the similar-looking group ComicBook/TheInhumans in favor of over the X-Men. Tensions would cool when Fox had a changing of the guard and ''Film/{{Deadpool|2016}}'' ended up becoming the biggest R-Rated movie in history with Disney's acquisition of Fox allowing both teams to return to media in full force. Despite Marvel owning rights to just about every other media type to the character, fans are fearful that this will be repeated concerning ComicBook/SpiderMan after talks broke down between Disney and Sony, leading Spidey to be nearly jettisoned out of the Marvel Cinematic Universe until finally deciding to give him another film (what happens afterwards is currently unknown).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This also happened to the ''ComicBook/GodzillaKingOfTheMonsters1977'' series, in which he rampaged through Earth-616, chased by ComicBook/{{Shield}} Once Marvel lost the rights, one of the villains initially mutated Godzilla into something different, so that he could still appear as a nameless {{Kaiju}} (though that was retconned). He reappeared years later with a different, yet still Godzilla-like look, appearing just long enough so that his storyline with another character could be completed [[BackForTheDead with his death]]. It wouldn't be the last time Godzilla would appear in a prominent comic book featuring superheroes, as the Franchise/MonsterVerse incarnation (and that franchise's versions of other kaiju) would crossover with DC Comics for '''ComicBook/JusticeLeagueVsGodzillaVsKong''.

to:

** This also happened to the ''ComicBook/GodzillaKingOfTheMonsters1977'' series, in which he rampaged through Earth-616, chased by ComicBook/{{Shield}} Once Marvel lost the rights, one of the villains initially mutated Godzilla into something different, so that he could still appear as a nameless {{Kaiju}} (though that was retconned). He reappeared years later with a different, yet still Godzilla-like look, appearing just long enough so that his storyline with another character could be completed [[BackForTheDead with his death]]. It wouldn't be the last time Godzilla would appear in a prominent comic book featuring superheroes, as the Franchise/MonsterVerse incarnation (and that franchise's versions of other kaiju) would crossover with DC Comics for '''ComicBook/JusticeLeagueVsGodzillaVsKong''.''ComicBook/JusticeLeagueVsGodzillaVsKong''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This also happened to the ''ComicBook/GodzillaKingOfTheMonsters1977'' series, in which he rampaged through Earth-616, chased by ComicBook/{{Shield}} Once Marvel lost the rights, one of the villains initially mutated Godzilla into something different, so that he could still appear as a nameless {{Kaiju}} (though that was retconned). He reappeared years later with a different, yet still Godzilla-like look, appearing just long enough so that his storyline with another character could be completed [[BackForTheDead with his death]].

to:

** This also happened to the ''ComicBook/GodzillaKingOfTheMonsters1977'' series, in which he rampaged through Earth-616, chased by ComicBook/{{Shield}} Once Marvel lost the rights, one of the villains initially mutated Godzilla into something different, so that he could still appear as a nameless {{Kaiju}} (though that was retconned). He reappeared years later with a different, yet still Godzilla-like look, appearing just long enough so that his storyline with another character could be completed [[BackForTheDead with his death]]. It wouldn't be the last time Godzilla would appear in a prominent comic book featuring superheroes, as the Franchise/MonsterVerse incarnation (and that franchise's versions of other kaiju) would crossover with DC Comics for '''ComicBook/JusticeLeagueVsGodzillaVsKong''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Updating Links


* In the late 1990s, Black Mermaid Productions of Australia were responsible for ''Comicbook/ElfQuest: Wavedancers'', which featured a group of aquatic elves. "Creative differences" between Black Mermaid and EQ publisher Warp Graphics led to the cancellation of the series, and an agreement that neither company would reprint it. Warp came out with its own ''Wavedancers'' series featuring new characters, while Black Mermaid is reportedly working on something called ''Elf Fin''.

to:

* In the late 1990s, Black Mermaid Productions of Australia were responsible for ''Comicbook/ElfQuest: ''ComicBook/ElfQuest: Wavedancers'', which featured a group of aquatic elves. "Creative differences" between Black Mermaid and EQ publisher Warp Graphics led to the cancellation of the series, and an agreement that neither company would reprint it. Warp came out with its own ''Wavedancers'' series featuring new characters, while Black Mermaid is reportedly working on something called ''Elf Fin''.



** Another well-known 80's superhero comic that was caught in a rights-ownership dispute for decades is the Creator/AlanMoore[=/=]Creator/NeilGaiman ''Marvelman'' (''Comicbook/MiracleMan'' [[MarketBasedTitle in America]]) - Rebellion, IPC, Neil Gaiman, Alan Moore and [=Todd McFarlane=] ''all'' had a claim on the series. Marvel apparently cleared the rights for the earliest stories featuring the character, but not for its run in Warrior magazine or Eclipse Comics. Said run, featuring the work of Moore and Gaiman, is naturally of the most interest to comic readers and was left as a particularly sad example of KeepCirculatingTheTapes. [=McFarlane=] claimed he had gotten the rights to Miracleman when he purchased ''Eclipse'''s creative assets in 1996, and introduced the character into ''Spawn'' as a cosmic entity called the "Man Of Miracles[=/=]Mother of Creation". In 2001, Gaiman launched a second lawsuit against [=McFarlane=] to get ownership of the character back, and in 2009 Marvel purchased the character from his original creator, Mick Anglo. In 2014, Marvel finally began reprinting the Moore issues from the start in serial form, and has promised that once the Gaiman issues run out they will publish new issues that continue the arcs as originally planned, while ''Spawn'' underwent a ContinuityReboot that retconned Miracleman out of the comic.
* The 1978 one-shot comic ''Franchise/{{Superman}} vs. UsefulNotes/MuhammadAli'' was not reprinted until 2010, as the cover included the likenesses of over a hundred 1970s celebrities in the background. The lawyers had to be convinced no one would sue.

to:

** Another well-known 80's superhero comic that was caught in a rights-ownership dispute for decades is the Creator/AlanMoore[=/=]Creator/NeilGaiman ''Marvelman'' (''Comicbook/MiracleMan'' (''ComicBook/MiracleMan'' [[MarketBasedTitle in America]]) - Rebellion, IPC, Neil Gaiman, Alan Moore and [=Todd McFarlane=] ''all'' had a claim on the series. Marvel apparently cleared the rights for the earliest stories featuring the character, but not for its run in Warrior magazine or Eclipse Comics. Said run, featuring the work of Moore and Gaiman, is naturally of the most interest to comic readers and was left as a particularly sad example of KeepCirculatingTheTapes. [=McFarlane=] claimed he had gotten the rights to Miracleman when he purchased ''Eclipse'''s creative assets in 1996, and introduced the character into ''Spawn'' as a cosmic entity called the "Man Of Miracles[=/=]Mother of Creation". In 2001, Gaiman launched a second lawsuit against [=McFarlane=] to get ownership of the character back, and in 2009 Marvel purchased the character from his original creator, Mick Anglo. In 2014, Marvel finally began reprinting the Moore issues from the start in serial form, and has promised that once the Gaiman issues run out they will publish new issues that continue the arcs as originally planned, while ''Spawn'' underwent a ContinuityReboot that retconned Miracleman out of the comic.
* The 1978 one-shot comic ''Franchise/{{Superman}} ''ComicBook/{{Superman}} vs. UsefulNotes/MuhammadAli'' was not reprinted until 2010, as the cover included the likenesses of over a hundred 1970s celebrities in the background. The lawyers had to be convinced no one would sue.



* The ''Franchise/SpiderMan'' storyline ''ComicBook/SpiderVerse'' had virtually ''every'' Spider-Man in existence show up in some form. However, there are eight that were not allowed to appear. Seven were confirmed, though: the [[Film/SpiderManTrilogy Spider-Man]] portrayed by Creator/TobeyMaguire, the [[Film/TheAmazingSpiderManSeries Spider-Man]] portrayed by Creator/AndrewGarfield, the Spider-Man of ''WesternAnimation/TheSpectacularSpiderMan'', the Spider-Man of ''WesternAnimation/SpiderManTheNewAnimatedSeries'' and the three Spider-Boys from the ComicBook/AmalgamUniverse. The first four Spideys are owned by Creator/SonyPictures, the latter three are (both legally and [[FusionDance in-universe]]) half-Marvel, half-Creator/DCComics (and it goes the other way too: DC stated they couldn't use any Amalgam character in ''ComicBook/{{Convergence}}'' either for the same reason). There was a workaround. One of the issues featured a conversation between two of the Spider-Men, who mentioned having seen (respectively) a Spider-Man who looked exactly like Creator/TobeyMaguire (referred to as "the guy from ''Film/{{Seabiscuit}}''") and a Spider-Man who looked exactly like Creator/AndrewGarfield (referred to as "the guy from ''Film/TheSocialNetwork''"). Additionally, they mentioned having seen a [[Series/TheElectricCompany1971 Spider-Man who kept teaching grammar]] and a [[Theatre/SpiderManTurnOffTheDark Spider-Man who wouldn't stop singing show tunes]].

to:

* ''ComicBook/SpiderMan'': The ''Franchise/SpiderMan'' storyline ''ComicBook/SpiderVerse'' had virtually ''every'' Spider-Man in existence show up in some form. However, there are eight that were not allowed to appear. Seven were confirmed, though: the [[Film/SpiderManTrilogy Spider-Man]] portrayed by Creator/TobeyMaguire, the [[Film/TheAmazingSpiderManSeries Spider-Man]] portrayed by Creator/AndrewGarfield, the Spider-Man of ''WesternAnimation/TheSpectacularSpiderMan'', the Spider-Man of ''WesternAnimation/SpiderManTheNewAnimatedSeries'' and the three Spider-Boys from the ComicBook/AmalgamUniverse. The first four Spideys are owned by Creator/SonyPictures, the latter three are (both legally and [[FusionDance in-universe]]) half-Marvel, half-Creator/DCComics (and it goes the other way too: DC stated they couldn't use any Amalgam character in ''ComicBook/{{Convergence}}'' either for the same reason). There was a workaround. One of the issues featured a conversation between two of the Spider-Men, who mentioned having seen (respectively) a Spider-Man who looked exactly like Creator/TobeyMaguire (referred to as "the guy from ''Film/{{Seabiscuit}}''") and a Spider-Man who looked exactly like Creator/AndrewGarfield (referred to as "the guy from ''Film/TheSocialNetwork''"). Additionally, they mentioned having seen a [[Series/TheElectricCompany1971 Spider-Man who kept teaching grammar]] and a [[Theatre/SpiderManTurnOffTheDark Spider-Man who wouldn't stop singing show tunes]].



* It's not just Disney's ownership of Marvel Comics that's preventing the comic book line of Creator/{{Nickelodeon}}'s ''WesternAnimation/TheRenAndStimpyShow'' from being reprinted. Issue #6, dated May 1993, features Franchise/SpiderMan as a main character, making his removal in a reprinting impossible.
* Whoo, boy. Franchise/XMen and ComicBook/FantasticFour was screwed by this trope between 2015 and 2019. Around 2015, Creator/{{Disney}} and Creator/MarvelComics was angry at Creator/TwentiethCenturyFox for its iron grip on the Fantastic Four movie rights and the mess that was ''Film/FantasticFour2015''. To absolutely deny Fox any sort of promotion (and to spite themselves in the process), Marvel went full denial towards the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, removing them from cartoons and games, cancelling the Fantastic Four's comic and trying to raise the popularity of the similar-looking group ComicBook/TheInhumans in favor of the X-Men. Tensions would cool when Fox had a changing of the guard and ''Film/{{Deadpool|2016}}'' ended up becoming the biggest R-Rated movie in history with Disney's acquisition of Fox allowing both teams to return to media in full force. Despite Marvel owning rights to just about every other media type to the character, fans are fearful that this will be repeated concerning Franchise/SpiderMan after talks broke down between Disney and Sony, leading Spidey to be nearly jettisoned out of the Marvel Cinematic Universe until finally deciding to give him another film (what happens afterwards is currently unknown).

to:

* It's not just Disney's ownership of Marvel Comics that's preventing the comic book line of Creator/{{Nickelodeon}}'s ''WesternAnimation/TheRenAndStimpyShow'' from being reprinted. Issue #6, dated May 1993, features Franchise/SpiderMan ComicBook/SpiderMan as a main character, making his removal in a reprinting impossible.
* Whoo, boy. Franchise/XMen ComicBook/XMen and ComicBook/FantasticFour was screwed by this trope between 2015 and 2019. Around 2015, Creator/{{Disney}} and Creator/MarvelComics was angry at Creator/TwentiethCenturyFox for its iron grip on the Fantastic Four movie rights and the mess that was ''Film/FantasticFour2015''. To absolutely deny Fox any sort of promotion (and to spite themselves in the process), Marvel went full denial towards the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, removing them from cartoons and games, cancelling the Fantastic Four's comic and trying to raise the popularity of the similar-looking group ComicBook/TheInhumans in favor of the X-Men. Tensions would cool when Fox had a changing of the guard and ''Film/{{Deadpool|2016}}'' ended up becoming the biggest R-Rated movie in history with Disney's acquisition of Fox allowing both teams to return to media in full force. Despite Marvel owning rights to just about every other media type to the character, fans are fearful that this will be repeated concerning Franchise/SpiderMan ComicBook/SpiderMan after talks broke down between Disney and Sony, leading Spidey to be nearly jettisoned out of the Marvel Cinematic Universe until finally deciding to give him another film (what happens afterwards is currently unknown).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/JimShooter's Defiant Comics was going to publish the comic ''Plasm''. The title was changed to ''Warriors of Plasm'' when Marvel claimed the title was too similar to the Marvel UK comic ''ComicBook/{{Plasmer}}''. The legal costs contributed to Defiant Comics going bankrupt.

to:

* Creator/JimShooter's Defiant Comics Creator/DefiantComics was going to publish the comic ''Plasm''. The title was changed to ''Warriors of Plasm'' when Marvel claimed the title was too similar to the Marvel UK comic ''ComicBook/{{Plasmer}}''. The legal costs contributed to Defiant Comics going bankrupt.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogArchieComics'':
* In 2010, Ken Penders, former head writer for the series, filed copyright claims for all of his characters and creations in an attempt to [[MoneyDearBoy gain royalties for their use]], promoting Archie Comics to file a lawsuit against him and take him to court to disprove his claims. While things didn't seem all that bad at first, the case began to swing in Penders' favor when it became clear that Archie could not prove their ownership of the properties in question, mostly due to having somehow misplaced a lot of paperwork including Penders' original contract, and caused so many delays in court that the judge threatened to throw the case out, which would give Penders the victory by default.[[note]]The exact details are unknown, but Penders proclaims that the original contracts were destroyed -- how they were is disputed; one account suggests fire, another a careless intern destroyed them.[[/note]] In a panic, Archie decided to remove all of Penders' creations from the comic while it was in the middle of a story arc that centered around them, throwing the plot completely out of whack and making fans (and the creative staff) livid. In the end, the two sides settled, and though Penders stated that Archie could be allowed to use his creations anyway, the conditions he put up for that didn't sit well with Archie and they instead decided to perform a soft reboot for the series via a CosmicRetcon at the end of ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogMegaManWorldsCollide''. The character removals also extended to all creators whose names were not Sega, [=DiC=] or Ian Flynn. Conversely, when it comes to Penders himself, the whole affair can best be described as bit of a PyrrhicVictory for him. While he might have the rights to the names of and some concepts related to the characters he created, he can in most cases not really put them to any use without making heavy alterations to their design as they in their original form would be highly derivative of Sega's property and could therefore easily place him on the receiving end of this trope. Not to mention that, regardless of his motivations, Penders' actions and their consequences made him a pariah in the fandom.

to:

* ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogArchieComics'':
*
''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogArchieComics'':
**
In 2010, Ken Penders, former head writer for the series, filed copyright claims for all of his characters and creations in an attempt to [[MoneyDearBoy gain royalties for their use]], promoting Archie Comics to file a lawsuit against him and take him to court to disprove his claims. While things didn't seem all that bad at first, the case began to swing in Penders' favor when it became clear that Archie could not prove their ownership of the properties in question, mostly due to having somehow misplaced a lot of paperwork including Penders' original contract, and caused so many delays in court that the judge threatened to throw the case out, which would give Penders the victory by default.[[note]]The exact details are unknown, but Penders proclaims that the original contracts were destroyed -- how they were is disputed; one account suggests fire, another a careless intern destroyed them.[[/note]] In a panic, Archie decided to remove all of Penders' creations from the comic while it was in the middle of a story arc that centered around them, throwing the plot completely out of whack and making fans (and the creative staff) livid. In the end, the two sides settled, and though Penders stated that Archie could be allowed to use his creations anyway, the conditions he put up for that didn't sit well with Archie and they instead decided to perform a soft reboot for the series via a CosmicRetcon at the end of ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogMegaManWorldsCollide''. The character removals also extended to all creators whose names were not Sega, [=DiC=] or Ian Flynn. Conversely, when it comes to Penders himself, the whole affair can best be described as bit of a PyrrhicVictory for him. While he might have the rights to the names of and some concepts related to the characters he created, he can in most cases not really put them to any use without making heavy alterations to their design as they in their original form would be highly derivative of Sega's property and could therefore easily place him on the receiving end of this trope. Not to mention that, regardless of his motivations, Penders' actions and their consequences made him a pariah in the fandom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In 2010, Ken Penders, former head writer of ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogArchieComics'', filed copyright claims for all of his characters and creations in an attempt to [[MoneyDearBoy gain royalties for their use]], promoting Archie Comics to file a lawsuit against him and take him to court to disprove his claims. While things didn't seem all that bad at first, the case began to swing in Penders' favor when it became clear that Archie could not prove their ownership of the properties in question, mostly due to having somehow misplaced a lot of paperwork including Penders' original contract, and caused so many delays in court that the judge threatened to throw the case out, which would give Penders the victory by default.[[note]]The exact details are unknown, but Penders proclaims that the original contracts were destroyed -- how they were is disputed; one account suggests fire, another a careless intern destroyed them.[[/note]] In a panic, Archie decided to remove all of Penders' creations from the comic while it was in the middle of a story arc that centered around them, throwing the plot completely out of whack and making fans (and the creative staff) livid. In the end, the two sides settled, and though Penders stated that Archie could be allowed to use his creations anyway, the conditions he put up for that didn't sit well with Archie and they instead decided to perform a soft reboot for the series via a CosmicRetcon at the end of ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogMegaManWorldsCollide''. The character removals also extended to all creators whose names were not Sega, [=DiC=] or Ian Flynn.
** Conversely, when it comes to Penders himself, the whole affair can best be described as bit of a PyrrhicVictory for him. While he might have the rights to the names of and some concepts related to the characters he created, he can in most cases not really put them to any use without making heavy alterations to their design as they in their original form would be highly derivative of Sega's property and could therefore easily place him on the receiving end of this trope. Not to mention that, regardless of his motivations, Penders' actions and their consequences made him a pariah in the fandom.

to:

* ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogArchieComics'':
* In 2010, Ken Penders, former head writer of ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogArchieComics'', for the series, filed copyright claims for all of his characters and creations in an attempt to [[MoneyDearBoy gain royalties for their use]], promoting Archie Comics to file a lawsuit against him and take him to court to disprove his claims. While things didn't seem all that bad at first, the case began to swing in Penders' favor when it became clear that Archie could not prove their ownership of the properties in question, mostly due to having somehow misplaced a lot of paperwork including Penders' original contract, and caused so many delays in court that the judge threatened to throw the case out, which would give Penders the victory by default.[[note]]The exact details are unknown, but Penders proclaims that the original contracts were destroyed -- how they were is disputed; one account suggests fire, another a careless intern destroyed them.[[/note]] In a panic, Archie decided to remove all of Penders' creations from the comic while it was in the middle of a story arc that centered around them, throwing the plot completely out of whack and making fans (and the creative staff) livid. In the end, the two sides settled, and though Penders stated that Archie could be allowed to use his creations anyway, the conditions he put up for that didn't sit well with Archie and they instead decided to perform a soft reboot for the series via a CosmicRetcon at the end of ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogMegaManWorldsCollide''. The character removals also extended to all creators whose names were not Sega, [=DiC=] or Ian Flynn.
**
Flynn. Conversely, when it comes to Penders himself, the whole affair can best be described as bit of a PyrrhicVictory for him. While he might have the rights to the names of and some concepts related to the characters he created, he can in most cases not really put them to any use without making heavy alterations to their design as they in their original form would be highly derivative of Sega's property and could therefore easily place him on the receiving end of this trope. Not to mention that, regardless of his motivations, Penders' actions and their consequences made him a pariah in the fandom.
Mrph1 MOD

Added: 873

Changed: 1967

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/MarvelComics' ''ComicBook/RomSpaceKnight'' probably won't be collected in a trade. Rom was a space based hero who fought gigantic EldritchAbomination creatures called the Dire Wraiths in the Marvel Universe. However, Marvel only licensed the character of Rom from Parker Brothers; he is now owned by Creator/{{Hasbro}} through a series of acquisitions. Conversely, when Hasbro's comic partner Creator/IDWPublishing rebooted Rom for the [[ComicBook/HasbroComicUniverse shared universe]] of their ''Franchise/{{Transformers}}'' and ''Franchise/GIJoe'' comics, they had to completely strip him and the Wraiths of their Marvel-created elements as they still belong to Marvel, including things such as Rom's human form, his supporting cast and the character designs of the Wraiths. The best we've seen in Marvel these days is a SerialNumbersFiledOff offspring who talks about a [[YouKnowTheOne great hero]].
** Something of the sort also happened to ''Franchise/{{Godzilla}}'' as the beast once rampaged through Earth-616, chased by S.H.I.E.L.D. Once Marvel lost the rights to the beast, they used one story where one of the villains created during this time mutated him into something different, though that was retconned. He reappeared years later with a different, yet still Godzilla-like look, appearing just long enough so that his storyline with another character could be completed with him being killed.

to:

* Creator/MarvelComics' had a few cases of this with licensed properties they'd integrated into the Franchise/MarvelUniverse:
**
''ComicBook/RomSpaceKnight'' probably won't be collected in a trade. Rom was reprinted. Rom's a space based hero who fought gigantic normally battles an EldritchAbomination creatures race called the Dire Wraiths in the Marvel Universe. Wraiths. However, Marvel only licensed the character of Rom from Parker Brothers; he is Brothers, who'd created the original Rom toy; he's now owned by Creator/{{Hasbro}} through after a series of acquisitions. Conversely, when Hasbro's comic partner Creator/IDWPublishing rebooted Rom for the [[ComicBook/HasbroComicUniverse shared universe]] of their ''Franchise/{{Transformers}}'' and ''Franchise/GIJoe'' comics, they but had to completely strip him and the Wraiths of their Marvel-created elements as they still belong to Marvel, including things such as (including Rom's human form, his supporting cast and the character designs of the Wraiths. Wraiths). The best we've seen in Marvel can do these days is a SerialNumbersFiledOff offspring who talks about a [[YouKnowTheOne great hero]].
** Something of
hero]] - although the sort Dire Wraiths still turn up as villains now and then.
** This
also happened to ''Franchise/{{Godzilla}}'' as the beast once ''ComicBook/GodzillaKingOfTheMonsters1977'' series, in which he rampaged through Earth-616, chased by S.H.I.E.L.D. ComicBook/{{Shield}} Once Marvel lost the rights to the beast, they used one story where rights, one of the villains created during this time initially mutated him Godzilla into something different, though so that he could still appear as a nameless {{Kaiju}} (though that was retconned. retconned). He reappeared years later with a different, yet still Godzilla-like look, appearing just long enough so that his storyline with another character could be completed [[BackForTheDead with him being killed.his death]].
** ''ComicBook/ShogunWarriors'' is yet another example of this, as the giant robots names and likenesses were licensed from the eponymous Creator/{{Mattel}} toy line. Once the series and licensing deal ended, the three robots were effectively KilledOffscreen, but the pilots, supporting cast and antagonists remained available to Marvel.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Conversely, when it comes to Penders himself, the whole affair can best be described as bit of a PyrrhicVictory for him. While he might have the rights to the names of and some concepts related to the characters he created, he can in most cases not really put them to any use without making heavy alterations to their design as they in their original form would be highly derivative of Sega's property and could therefore easily place him on the receiving end of this trope.

to:

** Conversely, when it comes to Penders himself, the whole affair can best be described as bit of a PyrrhicVictory for him. While he might have the rights to the names of and some concepts related to the characters he created, he can in most cases not really put them to any use without making heavy alterations to their design as they in their original form would be highly derivative of Sega's property and could therefore easily place him on the receiving end of this trope. Not to mention that, regardless of his motivations, Penders' actions and their consequences made him a pariah in the fandom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Failed negotiations between Sega and Archie in 2017 [[FranchiseKiller directly resulted in the termination of the comic book series]].

to:

** Failed negotiations between Sega and Archie in 2017 [[FranchiseKiller directly resulted in the termination of the comic book series]].series]] and [[ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogIDW transfer of the property]] to Creator/IDWPublishing.

Changed: 76

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** On a similar note, his ''Gideon Stargrave'' mini-series, a spin-off of ''ComicBook/TheInvisibles'', is unlikely to ever get republished, as Morrison admitted that Stargrave is basically an expy of [[Literature/TheCorneliusChronicles Jerry Cornelius]], and Cornelius creator Creator/MichaelMoorcock bears a grudge against Morrison for blatantly plagiarizing one of his stories.

to:

** On a similar note, his ''Gideon Stargrave'' mini-series, a spin-off of ''ComicBook/TheInvisibles'', is unlikely to ever get republished, as Morrison admitted that Stargrave is basically an expy of [[Literature/TheCorneliusChronicles Jerry Cornelius]], and Cornelius creator Creator/MichaelMoorcock bears a grudge against Morrison for blatantly plagiarizing doing an homage to one of his stories.stories, which Moorcock interpreted as plagiarism.
Mrph1 MOD

Changed: 14

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/JimShooter's Defiant Comics was going to publish the comic ''Plasm''. The title was changed to ''Warriors of Plasm'' when Marvel claimed the title was too similar to the Marvel UK comic ''Plasmer''. The legal costs contributed to Defiant Comics going bankrupt.

to:

* Creator/JimShooter's Defiant Comics was going to publish the comic ''Plasm''. The title was changed to ''Warriors of Plasm'' when Marvel claimed the title was too similar to the Marvel UK comic ''Plasmer''.''ComicBook/{{Plasmer}}''. The legal costs contributed to Defiant Comics going bankrupt.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''ComicBook/OnceUponACaper'' was originally released as ''Once Upon a Super Hero'', but had to change its name due to DC and Marvel holding a joint trademark over the term "super hero". And it's likely we'll never get more than the first issue due to a rights dispute.

to:

* ''ComicBook/OnceUponACaper'' was originally released as ''Once Upon a Super Hero'', but had to change its name due to DC and Marvel holding a joint trademark over the term "super hero". And it's likely we'll never get more than the first issue due to a rights dispute.dispute.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In 2010, Ken Penders, former head writer of ''ComicBook/ArchieComicsSonicTheHedgehog'', filed copyright claims for all of his characters and creations in an attempt to [[MoneyDearBoy gain royalties for their use]], promoting Archie Comics to file a lawsuit against him and take him to court to disprove his claims. While things didn't seem all that bad at first, the case began to swing in Penders' favor when it became clear that Archie could not prove their ownership of the properties in question, mostly due to having somehow misplaced a lot of paperwork including Penders' original contract, and caused so many delays in court that the judge threatened to throw the case out, which would give Penders the victory by default.[[note]]The exact details are unknown, but Penders proclaims that the original contracts were destroyed -- how they were is disputed; one account suggests fire, another a careless intern destroyed them.[[/note]] In a panic, Archie decided to remove all of Penders' creations from the comic while it was in the middle of a story arc that centered around them, throwing the plot completely out of whack and making fans (and the creative staff) livid. In the end, the two sides settled, and though Penders stated that Archie could be allowed to use his creations anyway, the conditions he put up for that didn't sit well with Archie and they instead decided to perform a soft reboot for the series via a CosmicRetcon at the end of ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogMegaManWorldsCollide''. The character removals also extended to all creators whose names were not Sega, [=DiC=] or Ian Flynn.

to:

* In 2010, Ken Penders, former head writer of ''ComicBook/ArchieComicsSonicTheHedgehog'', ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogArchieComics'', filed copyright claims for all of his characters and creations in an attempt to [[MoneyDearBoy gain royalties for their use]], promoting Archie Comics to file a lawsuit against him and take him to court to disprove his claims. While things didn't seem all that bad at first, the case began to swing in Penders' favor when it became clear that Archie could not prove their ownership of the properties in question, mostly due to having somehow misplaced a lot of paperwork including Penders' original contract, and caused so many delays in court that the judge threatened to throw the case out, which would give Penders the victory by default.[[note]]The exact details are unknown, but Penders proclaims that the original contracts were destroyed -- how they were is disputed; one account suggests fire, another a careless intern destroyed them.[[/note]] In a panic, Archie decided to remove all of Penders' creations from the comic while it was in the middle of a story arc that centered around them, throwing the plot completely out of whack and making fans (and the creative staff) livid. In the end, the two sides settled, and though Penders stated that Archie could be allowed to use his creations anyway, the conditions he put up for that didn't sit well with Archie and they instead decided to perform a soft reboot for the series via a CosmicRetcon at the end of ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogMegaManWorldsCollide''. The character removals also extended to all creators whose names were not Sega, [=DiC=] or Ian Flynn.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This was more of a case of Dueling Works, as there was no legal concerns to worry about (the original novel was already in the public domain when this happened).


* ''ComicBook/OnceUponACaper'' was originally released as ''Once Upon a Super Hero'', but had to change its name due to DC and Marvel holding a joint trademark over the term "super hero". And it's likely we'll never get more than the first issue due to a rights dispute.
* In 1975, both Marvel and DC were planning adaptations of the Wizard of Oz. While Marvel had obtained rights from the Baum estate, DC had obtained rights from MGM based on the movie. Without the rights from MGM, Dorothy's shoes would have had to be silver instead of ruby and they wouldn't be able to use the look of the characters from the movie. I also heard that there were some legal questions about basing the comic book on the movie without the rights from the Baum estate. When the editors from the two companies (Stan Lee and Carmine Infantino) learned about each other plans, they decided to make the project a collaborative effort between the two companies, making it into a special event and resolving the legal issues.

to:

* ''ComicBook/OnceUponACaper'' was originally released as ''Once Upon a Super Hero'', but had to change its name due to DC and Marvel holding a joint trademark over the term "super hero". And it's likely we'll never get more than the first issue due to a rights dispute.
* In 1975, both Marvel and DC were planning adaptations of the Wizard of Oz. While Marvel had obtained rights from the Baum estate, DC had obtained rights from MGM based on the movie. Without the rights from MGM, Dorothy's shoes would have had to be silver instead of ruby and they wouldn't be able to use the look of the characters from the movie. I also heard that there were some legal questions about basing the comic book on the movie without the rights from the Baum estate. When the editors from the two companies (Stan Lee and Carmine Infantino) learned about each other plans, they decided to make the project a collaborative effort between the two companies, making it into a special event and resolving the legal issues.
dispute.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Wrong Viz


* For a couple of years, Creator/{{Viz}} featured a strip called ''Captain Morgan and his Hammond Organ'', about a pirate captain who was more interested in playing 70s pop and disco hits on his Wurlitzer than in raiding other ships ([[MakesJustAsMuchSenseInContext it makes no more sense in context]]). Unfortunately, the copyright holders of the songs complained. Viz didn't have a leg to stand on legally, and the only way out was to have used songs that were out of copyright, like hymns and spirituals. Given that this would have killed the joke, Viz had no choice but to drop the strip.

to:

* For a couple of years, Creator/{{Viz}} ''ComicBook/{{Viz}}'' featured a strip called ''Captain Morgan and his Hammond Organ'', about a pirate captain who was more interested in playing 70s pop and disco hits on his Wurlitzer than in raiding other ships ([[MakesJustAsMuchSenseInContext it makes no more sense in context]]). Unfortunately, the copyright holders of the songs complained. Viz didn't have a leg to stand on legally, and the only way out was to have used songs that were out of copyright, like hymns and spirituals. Given that this would have killed the joke, Viz had no choice but to drop the strip.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Add Wizard of Oz comic book. Seehttps://dontfeedthegamers.com/throwback-thursday-marvel-dc-wizard-oz/


* In 1975, both Marvel and DC were planning adaptations of the Wizard of Oz. While Marvel had obtained rights from the Baum estate, DC had obtained rights from MGM based on the movie. Without the rights from MGM, Dorothy's shoes would have had to be silver instead of ruby and they wouldn't be able to use the look of the characters from the movie. I also heard that there were some legal questions about basing the comic book on the movie without the rights from the Baum estate. When the editors from the two companies (Stan Lee and Carmine Infantino) learned about each other plans, they decided to make the project a collaborative effort between the two companies, making it into a special event and resolving the legal issues.

to:

* In 1975, both Marvel and DC were planning adaptations of the Wizard of Oz. While Marvel had obtained rights from the Baum estate, DC had obtained rights from MGM based on the movie. movie. Without the rights from MGM, Dorothy's shoes would have had to be silver instead of ruby and they wouldn't be able to use the look of the characters from the movie. movie. I also heard that there were some legal questions about basing the comic book on the movie without the rights from the Baum estate. estate. When the editors from the two companies (Stan Lee and Carmine Infantino) learned about each other plans, they decided to make the project a collaborative effort between the two companies, making it into a special event and resolving the legal issues.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Add Wizard of


* ''ComicBook/OnceUponACaper'' was originally released as ''Once Upon a Super Hero'', but had to change its name due to DC and Marvel holding a joint trademark over the term "super hero". And it's likely we'll never get more than the first issue due to a rights dispute.

to:

* ''ComicBook/OnceUponACaper'' was originally released as ''Once Upon a Super Hero'', but had to change its name due to DC and Marvel holding a joint trademark over the term "super hero". And it's likely we'll never get more than the first issue due to a rights dispute.dispute.
* In 1975, both Marvel and DC were planning adaptations of the Wizard of Oz. While Marvel had obtained rights from the Baum estate, DC had obtained rights from MGM based on the movie. Without the rights from MGM, Dorothy's shoes would have had to be silver instead of ruby and they wouldn't be able to use the look of the characters from the movie. I also heard that there were some legal questions about basing the comic book on the movie without the rights from the Baum estate. When the editors from the two companies (Stan Lee and Carmine Infantino) learned about each other plans, they decided to make the project a collaborative effort between the two companies, making it into a special event and resolving the legal issues.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Whoo, boy. Franchise/XMen and ComicBook/FantasticFour was screwed by this trope between 2015 and 2019. Around 2015, Creator/{{Disney}} and Creator/MarvelComics was angry at Creator/TwentiethCenturyFox for its iron grip on the Fantastic Four movie rights and the mess that was ''Film/FantasticFour2015''. To absolutely deny Fox any sort of promotion (and to spite themselves in the process), Marvel went full denial towards the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, removing them from cartoons and games, cancelling the Fantastic Four's comic and trying to raise the popularity of the similar-looking group ComicBook/TheInhumans in favor of the X-Men. Tensions would cool when Fox had a changing of the guard and ''Film/{{Deadpool}}'' ended up becoming the biggest R-Rated movie in history with Disney's acquisition of Fox allowing both teams to return to media in full force. Despite Marvel owning rights to just about every other media type to the character, fans are fearful that this will be repeated concerning Franchise/SpiderMan after talks broke down between Disney and Sony, leading Spidey to be nearly jettisoned out of the Marvel Cinematic Universe until finally deciding to give him another film (what happens afterwards is currently unknown).

to:

* Whoo, boy. Franchise/XMen and ComicBook/FantasticFour was screwed by this trope between 2015 and 2019. Around 2015, Creator/{{Disney}} and Creator/MarvelComics was angry at Creator/TwentiethCenturyFox for its iron grip on the Fantastic Four movie rights and the mess that was ''Film/FantasticFour2015''. To absolutely deny Fox any sort of promotion (and to spite themselves in the process), Marvel went full denial towards the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, removing them from cartoons and games, cancelling the Fantastic Four's comic and trying to raise the popularity of the similar-looking group ComicBook/TheInhumans in favor of the X-Men. Tensions would cool when Fox had a changing of the guard and ''Film/{{Deadpool}}'' ''Film/{{Deadpool|2016}}'' ended up becoming the biggest R-Rated movie in history with Disney's acquisition of Fox allowing both teams to return to media in full force. Despite Marvel owning rights to just about every other media type to the character, fans are fearful that this will be repeated concerning Franchise/SpiderMan after talks broke down between Disney and Sony, leading Spidey to be nearly jettisoned out of the Marvel Cinematic Universe until finally deciding to give him another film (what happens afterwards is currently unknown).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Whoo, boy. Franchise/XMen and ComicBook/FantasticFour was screwed by this trope between 2015 and 2019. Around 2015, Creator/{{Disney}} and Creator/MarvelComics was angry at Creator/TwentiethCenturyFox for its iron grip on the Fantastic Four movie rights and the mess that was ''Film/FantasticFour2015''. To absolutely deny Fox any sort of promotion (and to spite themselves in the process), Marvel went full denial towards the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, removing them from cartoons and games, cancelling the Fantastic Four's comic and trying to raise the popularity of the similar-looking group ComicBook/TheInhumans in favor of the X-Men. Tensions would cool when Fox had a changing of the guard and ''Film/{{Deadpool}}'' ended up becoming the biggest R-Rated movie in history with Disney's acquisition of Fox allowing both teams to return to media in full force. Despite Marvel owning rights to just about every other media type to the character, fans are fearful that this will be repeated concerning Franchise/SpiderMan after talks broke down between Disney and Sony, leading Spidey to be jettisoned out of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

to:

* Whoo, boy. Franchise/XMen and ComicBook/FantasticFour was screwed by this trope between 2015 and 2019. Around 2015, Creator/{{Disney}} and Creator/MarvelComics was angry at Creator/TwentiethCenturyFox for its iron grip on the Fantastic Four movie rights and the mess that was ''Film/FantasticFour2015''. To absolutely deny Fox any sort of promotion (and to spite themselves in the process), Marvel went full denial towards the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, removing them from cartoons and games, cancelling the Fantastic Four's comic and trying to raise the popularity of the similar-looking group ComicBook/TheInhumans in favor of the X-Men. Tensions would cool when Fox had a changing of the guard and ''Film/{{Deadpool}}'' ended up becoming the biggest R-Rated movie in history with Disney's acquisition of Fox allowing both teams to return to media in full force. Despite Marvel owning rights to just about every other media type to the character, fans are fearful that this will be repeated concerning Franchise/SpiderMan after talks broke down between Disney and Sony, leading Spidey to be nearly jettisoned out of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.Universe until finally deciding to give him another film (what happens afterwards is currently unknown).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Whoo, boy. Franchise/XMen and ComicBook/FantasticFour was screwed by this trope between 2015 and 2019. Around 2015, Creator/{{Disney}} and Creator/MarvelComics was angry at Creator/TwentiethCenturyFox for its iron grip on the Fantastic Four movie rights and the mess that was ''Film/FantasticFour2015''. To absolutely deny Fox any sort of promotion (and to spite themselves in the process), Marvel went full denial towards the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, removing them from cartoons and games, cancelling the Fantastic Four's comic and trying to raise the popularity of the similar-looking group ComicBook/TheInhumans in favor of the X-Men. Tensions would cool when Fox had a changing of the guard and ''Film/{{Deadpool}}'' ended up becoming the biggest R-Rated movie in history with Disney's acquisition of Fox allowing both teams to return to media in full force.

to:

* Whoo, boy. Franchise/XMen and ComicBook/FantasticFour was screwed by this trope between 2015 and 2019. Around 2015, Creator/{{Disney}} and Creator/MarvelComics was angry at Creator/TwentiethCenturyFox for its iron grip on the Fantastic Four movie rights and the mess that was ''Film/FantasticFour2015''. To absolutely deny Fox any sort of promotion (and to spite themselves in the process), Marvel went full denial towards the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, removing them from cartoons and games, cancelling the Fantastic Four's comic and trying to raise the popularity of the similar-looking group ComicBook/TheInhumans in favor of the X-Men. Tensions would cool when Fox had a changing of the guard and ''Film/{{Deadpool}}'' ended up becoming the biggest R-Rated movie in history with Disney's acquisition of Fox allowing both teams to return to media in full force. Despite Marvel owning rights to just about every other media type to the character, fans are fearful that this will be repeated concerning Franchise/SpiderMan after talks broke down between Disney and Sony, leading Spidey to be jettisoned out of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Added: 270

Changed: -4

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* There was a Creator/MilestoneComics revival announced in 2015 to debut in 2018 that was cancelled due to an ongoing legal dispute between Creator/DwayneMcduffie’s wife on behalf of his estate and the other two creators of the company. She has claimed in court that they went so far as to make a new company behind her back to cut her out of the half she owns to make the deal with Creator/DCComics for the revival.

to:

* There was a Creator/MilestoneComics revival announced in 2015 to debut in 2018 that was cancelled due to an ongoing legal dispute between Creator/DwayneMcduffie’s wife on behalf of his estate and the other two creators of the company. She has claimed in court that they went so far as to make a new company behind her back to cut her out of the half she owns to make the deal with Creator/DCComics for the revival.revival.
* ''ComicBook/OnceUponACaper'' was originally released as ''Once Upon a Super Hero'', but had to change its name due to DC and Marvel holding a joint trademark over the term "super hero". And it's likely we'll never get more than the first issue due to a rights dispute.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Creator/JimShooter's Defiant Comics was going to publish the comic ''Plasm''. The title was changed to ''Warriors of Plasm'' when Marvel claimed the title was too similar to the Marvel UK comic ''Plasmer''. The legal costs contributed to Defiant Comics going bankrupt.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Whoo, boy. Franchise/XMen and ComicBook/FantasticFour was screwed by this trope between 2015 and 2019. Around 2015, Creator/{{Disney}} and Creator/MarvelComics was angry at Creator/TwentiethCenturyFox for its iron grip on the Fantastic Four movie rights and the mess that was ''Film/FantasticFour2015''. To absolutely deny Fox any sort of promotion (and to spite themselves in the process), Marvel went full denial towards the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, removing them from cartoons and games, cancelling the Fantastic Four's comic and trying to raise the popularity of the similar-looking group ComicBook/TheInhumans in favor of the X-Men. Tensions would cool when Fox had a changing of the guard and ''Film/{{Deadpool}}'' ended up becoming the biggest R-Rated movie in history with Disney's acquisition of Fox allowing both teams to return to media in full force.

to:

* Whoo, boy. Franchise/XMen and ComicBook/FantasticFour was screwed by this trope between 2015 and 2019. Around 2015, Creator/{{Disney}} and Creator/MarvelComics was angry at Creator/TwentiethCenturyFox for its iron grip on the Fantastic Four movie rights and the mess that was ''Film/FantasticFour2015''. To absolutely deny Fox any sort of promotion (and to spite themselves in the process), Marvel went full denial towards the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, removing them from cartoons and games, cancelling the Fantastic Four's comic and trying to raise the popularity of the similar-looking group ComicBook/TheInhumans in favor of the X-Men. Tensions would cool when Fox had a changing of the guard and ''Film/{{Deadpool}}'' ended up becoming the biggest R-Rated movie in history with Disney's acquisition of Fox allowing both teams to return to media in full force.force.
* There was a Creator/MilestoneComics revival announced in 2015 to debut in 2018 that was cancelled due to an ongoing legal dispute between Creator/DwayneMcduffie’s wife on behalf of his estate and the other two creators of the company. She has claimed in court that they went so far as to make a new company behind her back to cut her out of the half she owns to make the deal with Creator/DCComics for the revival.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* It's not just Disney's ownership of Marvel Comics that's preventing the comic book line of Creator/{{Nickelodeon}}'s ''WesternAnimation/TheRenAndStimpyShow'' from being reprinted. Issue #6, dated May 1993, features Franchise/SpiderMan as a main character, making his removal in a reprinting impossible.

to:

* It's not just Disney's ownership of Marvel Comics that's preventing the comic book line of Creator/{{Nickelodeon}}'s ''WesternAnimation/TheRenAndStimpyShow'' from being reprinted. Issue #6, dated May 1993, features Franchise/SpiderMan as a main character, making his removal in a reprinting impossible.impossible.
* Whoo, boy. Franchise/XMen and ComicBook/FantasticFour was screwed by this trope between 2015 and 2019. Around 2015, Creator/{{Disney}} and Creator/MarvelComics was angry at Creator/TwentiethCenturyFox for its iron grip on the Fantastic Four movie rights and the mess that was ''Film/FantasticFour2015''. To absolutely deny Fox any sort of promotion (and to spite themselves in the process), Marvel went full denial towards the Fantastic Four and the X-Men, removing them from cartoons and games, cancelling the Fantastic Four's comic and trying to raise the popularity of the similar-looking group ComicBook/TheInhumans in favor of the X-Men. Tensions would cool when Fox had a changing of the guard and ''Film/{{Deadpool}}'' ended up becoming the biggest R-Rated movie in history with Disney's acquisition of Fox allowing both teams to return to media in full force.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the late 1990s, Black Mermaid Productions of Australia were responsible for ''Comicbook/ElfQuest: Wavedancers'', which featured a group of aquatic elves. "Creative differences" between Black Mermaid and EQ publisher Warp Graphics led to the cancellation of the series, and an agreement that neither company would reprint it. Warp came out with its own ''Wavedancers'' series featuring new characters, while Black Mermaid is reportedly working on something called ''Elf Fin''.
* ''ComicBook/{{Zenith}}'' could not be reprinted for some time because Creator/GrantMorrison claimed that when Rebellion bought the rights to ''ComicBook/TwoThousandAD'' from IPC, it apparently didn't include the rights to ''Zenith''. The series was published in collected form in the mid-2010s, although the precise legal resolution remains murky.
* Morrison's ''ComicBook/DoomPatrol'' and ''ComicBook/FlexMentallo'' were kept out of reprints until the 2000s because of a trademark dispute with the Charles Atlas bodybuilding company over the character Flex, who began as a parody of Atlas's iconic comic strip advertisements.
** On a similar note, his ''Gideon Stargrave'' mini-series, a spin-off of ''ComicBook/TheInvisibles'', is unlikely to ever get republished, as Morrison admitted that Stargrave is basically an expy of [[Literature/TheCorneliusChronicles Jerry Cornelius]], and Cornelius creator Creator/MichaelMoorcock bears a grudge against Morrison for blatantly plagiarizing one of his stories.
* Something of a running gag with Todd [=McFarlane=] and ''ComicBook/{{Spawn}}''.
** [=McFarlane=] was sued by NHL player Anthony Rory Twist over the mobster Tony Twist, who [=McFarlane=] had admitted was named after him. In 2004 [=McFarlane=] was found guilty of having profited on Twist's likeness and eventually settled out of court.
** [=McFarlane=]'s habit of claiming sole ownership over the characters he co-created - dating back to his work on ComicBook/{{Venom}} - has gotten him into a ''lot'' of trouble with Creator/NeilGaiman, who wrote the stories that introduced the key characters Angela, Cogliostro, and Medieval Spawn in 1993. This resulted in an arduous legal battle that lasted until 2004, where a court hearing granted them joint ownership. Gaiman later returned to court over [[{{Expy}} expies]] of Medieval Spawn and Angela and [=McFarlane=]'s use of Miracleman, and it was ultimately decided that Gaiman would get Angela - eventually selling her to Marvel Comics in 2013 - and [=McFarlane=] would get Medieval Spawn and Cog.
** Another well-known 80's superhero comic that was caught in a rights-ownership dispute for decades is the Creator/AlanMoore[=/=]Creator/NeilGaiman ''Marvelman'' (''Comicbook/MiracleMan'' [[MarketBasedTitle in America]]) - Rebellion, IPC, Neil Gaiman, Alan Moore and [=Todd McFarlane=] ''all'' had a claim on the series. Marvel apparently cleared the rights for the earliest stories featuring the character, but not for its run in Warrior magazine or Eclipse Comics. Said run, featuring the work of Moore and Gaiman, is naturally of the most interest to comic readers and was left as a particularly sad example of KeepCirculatingTheTapes. [=McFarlane=] claimed he had gotten the rights to Miracleman when he purchased ''Eclipse'''s creative assets in 1996, and introduced the character into ''Spawn'' as a cosmic entity called the "Man Of Miracles[=/=]Mother of Creation". In 2001, Gaiman launched a second lawsuit against [=McFarlane=] to get ownership of the character back, and in 2009 Marvel purchased the character from his original creator, Mick Anglo. In 2014, Marvel finally began reprinting the Moore issues from the start in serial form, and has promised that once the Gaiman issues run out they will publish new issues that continue the arcs as originally planned, while ''Spawn'' underwent a ContinuityReboot that retconned Miracleman out of the comic.
* The 1978 one-shot comic ''Franchise/{{Superman}} vs. UsefulNotes/MuhammadAli'' was not reprinted until 2010, as the cover included the likenesses of over a hundred 1970s celebrities in the background. The lawyers had to be convinced no one would sue.
* In 2010, Ken Penders, former head writer of ''ComicBook/ArchieComicsSonicTheHedgehog'', filed copyright claims for all of his characters and creations in an attempt to [[MoneyDearBoy gain royalties for their use]], promoting Archie Comics to file a lawsuit against him and take him to court to disprove his claims. While things didn't seem all that bad at first, the case began to swing in Penders' favor when it became clear that Archie could not prove their ownership of the properties in question, mostly due to having somehow misplaced a lot of paperwork including Penders' original contract, and caused so many delays in court that the judge threatened to throw the case out, which would give Penders the victory by default.[[note]]The exact details are unknown, but Penders proclaims that the original contracts were destroyed -- how they were is disputed; one account suggests fire, another a careless intern destroyed them.[[/note]] In a panic, Archie decided to remove all of Penders' creations from the comic while it was in the middle of a story arc that centered around them, throwing the plot completely out of whack and making fans (and the creative staff) livid. In the end, the two sides settled, and though Penders stated that Archie could be allowed to use his creations anyway, the conditions he put up for that didn't sit well with Archie and they instead decided to perform a soft reboot for the series via a CosmicRetcon at the end of ''ComicBook/SonicTheHedgehogMegaManWorldsCollide''. The character removals also extended to all creators whose names were not Sega, [=DiC=] or Ian Flynn.
** Conversely, when it comes to Penders himself, the whole affair can best be described as bit of a PyrrhicVictory for him. While he might have the rights to the names of and some concepts related to the characters he created, he can in most cases not really put them to any use without making heavy alterations to their design as they in their original form would be highly derivative of Sega's property and could therefore easily place him on the receiving end of this trope.
** Failed negotiations between Sega and Archie in 2017 [[FranchiseKiller directly resulted in the termination of the comic book series]].
* For a couple of years, Creator/{{Viz}} featured a strip called ''Captain Morgan and his Hammond Organ'', about a pirate captain who was more interested in playing 70s pop and disco hits on his Wurlitzer than in raiding other ships ([[MakesJustAsMuchSenseInContext it makes no more sense in context]]). Unfortunately, the copyright holders of the songs complained. Viz didn't have a leg to stand on legally, and the only way out was to have used songs that were out of copyright, like hymns and spirituals. Given that this would have killed the joke, Viz had no choice but to drop the strip.
* Creator/MarvelComics' ''ComicBook/RomSpaceKnight'' probably won't be collected in a trade. Rom was a space based hero who fought gigantic EldritchAbomination creatures called the Dire Wraiths in the Marvel Universe. However, Marvel only licensed the character of Rom from Parker Brothers; he is now owned by Creator/{{Hasbro}} through a series of acquisitions. Conversely, when Hasbro's comic partner Creator/IDWPublishing rebooted Rom for the [[ComicBook/HasbroComicUniverse shared universe]] of their ''Franchise/{{Transformers}}'' and ''Franchise/GIJoe'' comics, they had to completely strip him and the Wraiths of their Marvel-created elements as they still belong to Marvel, including things such as Rom's human form, his supporting cast and the character designs of the Wraiths. The best we've seen in Marvel these days is a SerialNumbersFiledOff offspring who talks about a [[YouKnowTheOne great hero]].
** Something of the sort also happened to ''Franchise/{{Godzilla}}'' as the beast once rampaged through Earth-616, chased by S.H.I.E.L.D. Once Marvel lost the rights to the beast, they used one story where one of the villains created during this time mutated him into something different, though that was retconned. He reappeared years later with a different, yet still Godzilla-like look, appearing just long enough so that his storyline with another character could be completed with him being killed.
* The ''Franchise/SpiderMan'' storyline ''ComicBook/SpiderVerse'' had virtually ''every'' Spider-Man in existence show up in some form. However, there are eight that were not allowed to appear. Seven were confirmed, though: the [[Film/SpiderManTrilogy Spider-Man]] portrayed by Creator/TobeyMaguire, the [[Film/TheAmazingSpiderManSeries Spider-Man]] portrayed by Creator/AndrewGarfield, the Spider-Man of ''WesternAnimation/TheSpectacularSpiderMan'', the Spider-Man of ''WesternAnimation/SpiderManTheNewAnimatedSeries'' and the three Spider-Boys from the ComicBook/AmalgamUniverse. The first four Spideys are owned by Creator/SonyPictures, the latter three are (both legally and [[FusionDance in-universe]]) half-Marvel, half-Creator/DCComics (and it goes the other way too: DC stated they couldn't use any Amalgam character in ''ComicBook/{{Convergence}}'' either for the same reason). There was a workaround. One of the issues featured a conversation between two of the Spider-Men, who mentioned having seen (respectively) a Spider-Man who looked exactly like Creator/TobeyMaguire (referred to as "the guy from ''Film/{{Seabiscuit}}''") and a Spider-Man who looked exactly like Creator/AndrewGarfield (referred to as "the guy from ''Film/TheSocialNetwork''"). Additionally, they mentioned having seen a [[Series/TheElectricCompany1971 Spider-Man who kept teaching grammar]] and a [[Theatre/SpiderManTurnOffTheDark Spider-Man who wouldn't stop singing show tunes]].
* It's rumored that the reason Eli Bradley (AKA Patriot) hasn't appeared in any of the ''ComicBook/YoungAvengers''-related comics in recent years is due to a legal dispute between Marvel and the estate of Robert Morales, who created the Bradley family.
* In the early 1990s, Marvel UK was given the license from Creator/WarnerBros to publish ''WesternAnimation/TinyToonAdventures'' comic books in most of Europe (except the US, where they were published on magazines from Creator/DCComics). Marvel lost that license after just a year, were bought by Creator/{{Disney}} over a decade later, and Warner made all their comics based off their property published by DC in all territories following that stint, so it's safe to say the comics will not be reprinted anytime soon. The comics became extremely valuable and hard to find over time because of the comic book line's short lifespan, and Marvel UK isn't bothering to negotiate with their rival.
* Inverted with Marvel's ''Super-Villain Team-Up''. After its original cancellation, DC attempted to trademark the term "SuperVillain", so Marvel put out a few additional issues to prevent that.
* It's not just Disney's ownership of Marvel Comics that's preventing the comic book line of Creator/{{Nickelodeon}}'s ''WesternAnimation/TheRenAndStimpyShow'' from being reprinted. Issue #6, dated May 1993, features Franchise/SpiderMan as a main character, making his removal in a reprinting impossible.

Top