Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Retcon / RealLife

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* This happens all the time in biology and taxonomy when the scientific name of a species has to change. There are rules that detail how the process must undergo, in order to keep stability and avoid the chaos that would ensue if any author decided to change a name. For example, the name of a species can change if it has been discovered that another author previously described its scientific name in an independent manuscript. This is for example how ''Brontosaurus'' became ''Apatosaurus''. Another case happens when data analysis (particularly molecular data analysis in recent decades) shows that a species isn't really separated from another one and should be merged, or that a population is sufficiently different to warrant being distinguished as a subspecies or a new species. This is how it was established that ''Nanotyrannus'' is actually a juvenile form of ''Tyrannosaurus'', that the African forest elephant is a separated species from the savannah one, or that ''Brontosaurus'' was later proposed again as another specimen.
** Still, for practical uses, sometimes the retcon is not accepted anyway. In the most revelant cases several bacteria of interest for medicine should have their scientific name changed based on molecular data, but this would create unnecessary complications with manuals, protocols, therapies and screenings, thus physicians and biomedical researchers continue to use the older names. For example, [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441030/ it is a matter of contentious]] if the four ''Shigella'' species, which is an important pathogen, should be included within the very common ''Escherichia coli''.
* Before 1800, fungi were considered part of the kingdom of plants and not their own kingdom.
* It was between the 60s and the 70s that scientific consensus started to realize that dinosaurs weren't closer to modern reptiles, but rather to birds, to the point that birds directly evolved out of a branch of dinosaurs and from a genealogical point of view (that is phylogenesis) they should be considered dinosaurs themselves. Further discoveries, particularly evidence that many dinosaurs were feathered, contributed to completely change our understanding and depictions of them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
general clarification on works content


* Similarly, the Bourbon Restoration decided to ignore both [[UsefulNotes/TheFrenchRevolution the First French Republic]] and [[UsefulNotes/NapoleonBonaparte Napoleon's empire]]. They declared the son of Louis XVI (who had died of illness while imprisoned) to have been King Louis XVII despite never having ruled or even been crowned, and Louis XVIII dated his own reign from Louis XVII's death in 1795, instead of 1814, when he actually came to power. And when Bonaparte's nephew Louis-Napoleon took over in 1852, he took the regnal name of Napoleon III, with Bonaparte's son termed Napoleon II despite never ruling.

to:

* Similarly, the Bourbon Restoration decided to ignore both [[UsefulNotes/TheFrenchRevolution the First French Republic]] and [[UsefulNotes/NapoleonBonaparte Napoleon's empire]]. They declared the son of Louis XVI UsefulNotes/LouisXVI (who had died of illness while imprisoned) to have been King Louis XVII despite never having ruled or even been crowned, and Louis XVIII dated his own reign from Louis XVII's death in 1795, instead of 1814, when he actually came to power. And when Bonaparte's nephew Louis-Napoleon took over in 1852, he took the regnal name of Napoleon III, with Bonaparte's son termed Napoleon II despite never ruling.



* After UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, French President François Miterrand (a former member of [[LaResistance the Resistance]]) declared that [[LesCollaborateurs the Vichy Regime]] had never been more than a puppet government and Charles de Gaulle was to be recorded as the true and rightful head of state for the duration of the war, even though he spent four of those year in exile in England. This has not prevented many later historians from debating which city was functioning as the true wartime capital of France, London, Brazzaville[[note]]Capital of Free France, and current capital of the Republic of the Congo[[/note]], or Vichy.

to:

* After UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, French President François Miterrand (a former member UsefulNotes/CharlesDeGaulle (the leader of [[LaResistance the Resistance]]) declared that [[LesCollaborateurs the Vichy Regime]] Regime]] had never been [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordinance_of_9_August_1944 more than a puppet government government]] and Charles de Gaulle he was to be recorded as the true and rightful head of state for the duration of the war, even though he spent four of those year years in exile in England. This has not prevented many later historians from debating which city was functioning as the true wartime capital of France, London, Brazzaville[[note]]Capital of Free France, and current capital of the Republic of the Congo[[/note]], or Vichy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The UsefulNotes/NationalFootballLeague has a rule covering "Palpably Unfair Acts" that allows the NFL Commissioner to take actions up to and including reversing the result of a game (or voiding the game and requiring a do-over) in the event that an especially egregious act is committed. To date, this is only theoretical[[note]]the larger clause is enforced, but consequences up to this point have been limited to lesser penalties like fines or loss of draft picks[[/note]], but it is a power that commissioners are explicitly allowed to exercise in the event that one ever feels it's necessary.

to:

* The UsefulNotes/NationalFootballLeague has a rule covering clause in their "Palpably Unfair Acts" rule that allows the NFL Commissioner to take actions up to and including reversing the result of a game (or voiding the game -- entirely or from the point when the act was committed -- and requiring a do-over) in the event that an especially egregious act is committed. To date, this is only theoretical[[note]]the larger particular clause is enforced, but consequences up only theoretical, and commissioners understandably hope that a situation will never arise where they would need to this point have been limited to lesser penalties like fines or loss of draft picks[[/note]], use it, but it is a power that commissioners are explicitly allowed to exercise in the event that one ever feels it's necessary.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** However, an informal consensus emerged in most media (especially those that don't televise NASCAR) to use just "Cup Series" when discussing past races in the top series. This became official starting in 2020, when NASCAR adopted a new sponsorship model in which the top series is called the "Cup Series", with four companies as primary sponsors but none having their name on the series itself. Similarly, the third-level Craftsman Truck Series is typically known generically as the "Truck Series" (since all of that series' names have ended with those two words). The second-level series, however, holds to this trope, with the then-current name (now "Xfinity Series") typically used even in historic references. The term "Buschwhackers" (referring to Cup Series teams that race the secondary series for more track time), referring to its former name of the Busch Series, is still common though, although later fans used the term "Cup leech" for a more sponsor-neutral terminology.

to:

*** However, an informal consensus emerged in most media (especially those that don't televise NASCAR) to use just "Cup Series" when discussing past races in the top series. This became official starting in 2020, when NASCAR adopted a new sponsorship model in which the top series is called the "Cup Series", with four companies as primary sponsors but none having their name on the series itself. Similarly, the third-level Craftsman Truck Series is typically known generically as the "Truck Series" (since all of that series' names have ended with those two words). The second-level series, however, holds to this trope, with the then-current name (now "Xfinity Series") typically used even in historic references. The term "Buschwhackers" (referring to Cup Series teams that race the secondary series for more track time), referring to its former name of the Busch Series, Series (as in Busch beer), is still common though, although later fans used the term "Cup leech" for a more sponsor-neutral terminology.[[note]]In a funny coincidence the guy most associated with "Buschwhacking" - and the record holder for Xfinity Series wins with 102 is named Kyle Busch. Weirdly even though Busch beer has been a longtime partner of NASCAR they've never sponsored Kyle or his brother Kurt.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The Big East Conference split into three blocs in 2013 along [[UsefulNotes/CollegiateAmericanFootball football]] lines. One group of three schools moved to the Atlantic Coast Conference, one of the conferences now considered part of the so-called [[UsefulNotes/CollegiateAmericanFootballPower5Conferences Power Five]]. A second group, consisting of schools that didn't sponsor FBS (top-level) football, essentially said "ScrewThisImOuttaHere" and left to form their own non-football conference, buying the "Big East" name. The third group stayed in the conference structure under the new name of American Athletic Conference. The retcon: the current Big East considers itself the athletic successor of the original conference in all sports that it sponsors, and The American goes along with this. (Interestingly, this means that the pre-2013 histories of Big East football and women's rowing—the two sports that were sponsored by the pre-2013 Big East and remain sponsored by The American—are not recognized by ''either'' conference.)

to:

** The Big East Conference split into three blocs in 2013 along [[UsefulNotes/CollegiateAmericanFootball football]] lines. One group of three schools moved to the Atlantic Coast Conference, one of the conferences now considered part of the so-called [[UsefulNotes/CollegiateAmericanFootballPower5Conferences Power Five]].UsefulNotes/PowerFiveConferences. A second group, consisting of schools that didn't sponsor FBS (top-level) football, essentially said "ScrewThisImOuttaHere" and left to form their own non-football conference, buying the "Big East" name. The third group stayed in the conference structure under the new name of the [[UsefulNotes/GroupOfFiveConferences American Athletic Conference.Conference]]. The retcon: the current Big East considers itself the athletic successor of the original conference in all sports that it sponsors, and The American goes along with this. (Interestingly, this means that the pre-2013 histories of Big East football and women's rowing—the two sports that were sponsored by the pre-2013 Big East and remain sponsored by The American—are not recognized by ''either'' conference.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* When Seti I created the Abydos kinglist, which listed all of Egypt's pharaohs from King Menes, several were conspicuously missing: Hatshepsut, who had been retconned after her death by Thutmose III; UsefulNotes/{{Akhenaten}}, the Heretic King; and Tutankhamun and Ay, presumably because of association with Akhenaten. Instead, Horemheb's reign dates from the end of Amenhotep III's. 40 years after Hatshepsut's death, Thutmose III tried to erase all evidence that she had ever been pharaoh -- we don't know why, but it may have been that a female pharaoh shook up the status quo too much.

to:

* When Seti I created the Abydos kinglist, which listed all of Egypt's pharaohs from King Menes, several were conspicuously missing: Hatshepsut, UsefulNotes/{{Hatshepsut}}, who had been retconned after her death by Thutmose III; UsefulNotes/{{Akhenaten}}, the Heretic King; and Tutankhamun and Ay, presumably because of association with Akhenaten. Instead, Horemheb's reign dates from the end of Amenhotep III's. 40 years after Hatshepsut's death, Thutmose III tried to erase all evidence that she had ever been pharaoh -- we don't know why, but it may have been that a female pharaoh shook up the status quo too much.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Commonwealth countries that recognize the British monarch as head of state, such as Australia and Canada, originally did so as colonies, as it was only natural for the ruler of the imperial power to also be the nominal head of all colonial governments. As the colonies became more autonomous and self-governing, imperial law became more complicated, and when UsefulNotes/ElizabethII ascended to the throne, she was proclaimed to be the independent queen of over a dozen independent monarchies (i.e.; Queen of Australia of the Australian monarchy), rather than the imperial British queen. Commonwealth countries now frequently retcon old British monarchs in this way ("Former Kings of Canada") which further muddles the evolution of the relationship. Furthermore, the queen's regnal name in all the countries she reigns over is 'Elizabeth II'. With the possible exception of Canada (there was a tiny English settlement in Canada during Elizabeth I's reign), she is the first monarch called Elizabeth in all her countries except Britain itself (and even that doesn't hold true in Scotland).

to:

* Commonwealth countries that recognize the British monarch as head of state, such as Australia and Canada, originally did so as colonies, as it was only natural for the ruler of the imperial power to also be the nominal head of all colonial governments. As the colonies became more autonomous and self-governing, imperial law became more complicated, and when UsefulNotes/ElizabethII ascended to the throne, she was proclaimed to be the independent queen of over a dozen independent monarchies (i.e.; Queen of Australia of the Australian monarchy), rather than the imperial British queen. Commonwealth countries now frequently retcon old British monarchs in this way ("Former Kings of Canada") which further muddles the evolution of the relationship. Furthermore, the queen's regnal name in all the countries she reigns reigned over is was 'Elizabeth II'. With the possible exception of Canada (there was a tiny English settlement in Canada during Elizabeth I's reign), she is was the first monarch called Elizabeth in all her countries except Britain itself (and even that doesn't hold true in Scotland).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The 2006 reclassification of Pluto as a dwarf planet retconned decades of science textbooks. It was starting to get embarrassing as more and more trans-Neptunian objects were discovered that were of a similar size (one of them, Eris, is larger) but were deemed too small to call planets. The main argument for keeping Pluto in the class of planets was "cultural" (read: sentimental), so the "dwarf planet" term was a cultural compromise with a scientific bonus. Culturally, Pluto's significance as the first Kuiper Belt Object discovered and as one of the largest was still recognized (it became the {{Trope Namer|s}} for a new sub-class of [=KBOs=] / dwarf planets, the [[PerfectlyCromulentWord plutoids]]). Scientifically, Pluto was no longer complicating the IAU's terrestrial planet definition and the "upgrade" of Ceres from asteroid to dwarf planet resolved the paradox of the latter being the only Asteroid Belt Object massive enough to have overcome hydrostatic equilibrium and taken on a spherical shape [[note]]Ceres alone represents about a third of the total mass of the Asteroid Belt[[/note]]. Like Pluto, Ceres was considered a planet when it was first discovered in 1801 but "downgraded" soon afterwards when other large objects were found in the same general orbit.

to:

* The 2006 reclassification of Pluto as a dwarf planet retconned decades of science textbooks. It was starting to get embarrassing as more and more trans-Neptunian objects were discovered that were of a similar size (one of them, Eris, is larger) was thought to be larger, although current figures have it being a bit smaller) but were deemed too small to call planets. The main argument for keeping Pluto in the class of planets was "cultural" (read: sentimental), so the "dwarf planet" term was a cultural compromise with a scientific bonus. Culturally, Pluto's significance as the first Kuiper Belt Object discovered and as one of the largest was still recognized (it became the {{Trope Namer|s}} for a new sub-class of [=KBOs=] / dwarf planets, the [[PerfectlyCromulentWord plutoids]]). Scientifically, Pluto was no longer complicating the IAU's terrestrial planet definition and the "upgrade" of Ceres from asteroid to dwarf planet resolved the paradox of the latter being the only Asteroid Belt Object massive enough to have overcome hydrostatic equilibrium and taken on a spherical shape [[note]]Ceres alone represents about a third of the total mass of the Asteroid Belt[[/note]]. Like Pluto, Ceres was considered a planet when it was first discovered in 1801 but "downgraded" soon afterwards when other large objects were found in the same general orbit.



* Pope Gregory XIII decreed that the day after Thursday, 4 October 1582 would be not Friday, 5 October, but Friday, 15 October 1582. This was due to a miscalculation of days in the Julian calendar that had caused the Vernal Equinox to seemingly change from the traditional March 21 to March 11. Since the Church scheduled Easter based on the first day of Spring, the retcon was seen as necessary.

to:

* Pope Gregory XIII decreed that the day after Thursday, 4 October 1582 would be not Friday, 5 October, but Friday, 15 October 1582. This was due to a miscalculation of days in the Julian calendar that had caused the Vernal Equinox to seemingly change from the traditional March 21 to March 11. Since the Church scheduled Easter based on the first day of Spring, the retcon was seen as necessary. Other countries who hadn't changed at the time due to being anti-Pope, such as England, Sweden, and Russia, changed later, often having to skip even more days in the process due to more time having passed and the calendars treating leap years slightly differently.



* Easter eggs are said to tie into Easter, which celebrates the resurrection of Jesus, because they're a symbol of new life, and the empty shells represent the tomb Jesus awakened from and left empty. These metaphors were probably applied retroactively, and Easter eggs [[https://time.com/4732984/easter-eggs-history-origins/ likely originated from the pagan tradition]] of people eating, exchanging and burying eggs during spring equinox festivals to represent the end of winter and beginning of spring. Christian missionaries likely shoehorned the tradition into their holiday as a way to encourage conversions.

to:

* Easter eggs are said to tie into Easter, which celebrates the resurrection of Jesus, because they're a symbol of new life, and the empty shells represent the tomb Jesus awakened from and left empty. These metaphors were probably applied retroactively, and Easter eggs [[https://time.com/4732984/easter-eggs-history-origins/ likely originated from the pagan tradition]] of people eating, exchanging and burying eggs during spring equinox festivals to represent the end of winter and beginning of spring. Christian missionaries likely shoehorned the tradition into their holiday as a way to encourage conversions. Similar comments could be made about many Christmas traditions and winter solstice.

Added: 1038

Changed: 346

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The NWSL also has an example and an inversion.


** MLS' {{distaff counterpart}}, the National Women's Soccer League, has both inverted and embraced this trope.
*** After the 2017 season, FC Kansas City folded, with its player-related assets being acquired by the owners of MLS side Real Salt Lake, who launched Utah Royals FC the next season. In 2021, a new Kansas City team began play, but did not inherit any of FCKC's history or records. The new team played its first season under the placeholder name of Kansas City NWSL before becoming the Kansas City Current. It should be noted here that no member of the Current's ownership group had an ownership interest in FCKC.
*** As for the Royals, they played in the league through the 2020 season, after which a racism controversy involving Real's principal owner led him to put RSL up for sale and fold the Royals. The NWSL announced that Real's new ownership would have the option to revive the Royals in 2023, and the new owners took them up on it. The revived Royals, which will inherit the original's history, will start play in 2024.



*** However, an informal consensus emerged in most media (especially those that don't televise NASCAR) to use just "Cup Series" when discussing past races in the top series. This became official starting in 2020, when NASCAR adopted a new sponsorship model in which the top series is called the "Cup Series", with four companies as primary sponsors but none having their name on the series itself. Similarly, the third-level Camping World Truck Series is typically known generically as the "Truck Series" (since all of that series' names have ended with those two words). The second-level series, however, holds to this trope, with the then-current name (now "Xfinity Series") typically used even in historic references. The term "Buschwhackers" (referring to Cup Series teams that race the secondary series for more track time), referring to its former name of the Busch Series, is still common though, although later fans used the term "Cup leech" for a more sponsor-neutral terminology.

to:

*** However, an informal consensus emerged in most media (especially those that don't televise NASCAR) to use just "Cup Series" when discussing past races in the top series. This became official starting in 2020, when NASCAR adopted a new sponsorship model in which the top series is called the "Cup Series", with four companies as primary sponsors but none having their name on the series itself. Similarly, the third-level Camping World Craftsman Truck Series is typically known generically as the "Truck Series" (since all of that series' names have ended with those two words). The second-level series, however, holds to this trope, with the then-current name (now "Xfinity Series") typically used even in historic references. The term "Buschwhackers" (referring to Cup Series teams that race the secondary series for more track time), referring to its former name of the Busch Series, is still common though, although later fans used the term "Cup leech" for a more sponsor-neutral terminology.



** When FIFA sponsored its first official world championship events for women's football/soccer in 1991, it didn't want to use the "[[UsefulNotes/TheWorldCup World Cup]]" name, instead calling it the "1st FIFA World Championship for Women's Football for the M&M's Cup". By the time the next such event rolled around in 1995, FIFA decided to officially use the "World Cup" name, and declared the 1991 event to have been the first FIFA Women's World Cup.

to:

** When FIFA sponsored its first official world championship events for women's football/soccer in 1991, it didn't want to use the "[[UsefulNotes/TheWorldCup World Cup]]" name, instead calling it the "1st FIFA World Championship for Women's Football for the M&M's Cup". By While the time "M&M's Cup" part was dropped after that event, the next such event rolled around in 1995, FIFA decided to 1995 edition was still officially use known as the "World Cup" name, and declared "FIFA World Championship for Women's Football". It wasn't until 1999 that the 1991 women's event to have been was officially called by its current name of the first FIFA Women's World Cup.Cup. The 1991 and 1995 editions are now officially considered to have been the first two Women's World Cups.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Cut page.


** In UsefulNotes/{{NASCAR}}, the various racing series have changed names several times due to changes in sponsorship; commentators discussing past races (until recently) pretty much always referred to them by the current names, no matter what the series was called at the time. For instance, until very recently it could be mentioned that UsefulNotes/DaleEarnhardt won seven Monster Energy Cup championships, even though when he won them they were called Winston Cup championships. Similarly, UsefulNotes/RichardPetty's seven Cup championships consist of two Grand National and five Winston Cup titles, and Jimmie Johnson's seven consist of two Nextel Cup and five Sprint Cup titles.

to:

** In UsefulNotes/{{NASCAR}}, the various racing series have changed names several times due to changes in sponsorship; commentators discussing past races (until recently) pretty much always referred to them by the current names, no matter what the series was called at the time. For instance, until very recently it could be mentioned that UsefulNotes/DaleEarnhardt Dale Earnhardt won seven Monster Energy Cup championships, even though when he won them they were called Winston Cup championships. Similarly, UsefulNotes/RichardPetty's seven Cup championships consist of two Grand National and five Winston Cup titles, and Jimmie Johnson's seven consist of two Nextel Cup and five Sprint Cup titles.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Commonwealth countries that recognize the British monarch as head of state, such as Australia and Canada, originally did so as colonies, as it was only natural for the ruler of the imperial power to also be the nominal head of all colonial governments. As the colonies became more autonomous and self-governing, imperial law became more complicated, and when [[UsefulNotes/HMTheQueen Elizabeth II]] ascended to the throne, she was proclaimed to be the independent queen of over a dozen independent monarchies (i.e.; Queen of Australia of the Australian monarchy), rather than the imperial British queen. Commonwealth countries now frequently retcon old British monarchs in this way ("Former Kings of Canada") which further muddles the evolution of the relationship. Furthermore, the queen's regnal name in all the countries she reigns over is 'Elizabeth II'. With the possible exception of Canada (there was a tiny English settlement in Canada during Elizabeth I's reign), she is the first monarch called Elizabeth in all her countries except Britain itself (and even that doesn't hold true in Scotland).

to:

* Commonwealth countries that recognize the British monarch as head of state, such as Australia and Canada, originally did so as colonies, as it was only natural for the ruler of the imperial power to also be the nominal head of all colonial governments. As the colonies became more autonomous and self-governing, imperial law became more complicated, and when [[UsefulNotes/HMTheQueen Elizabeth II]] UsefulNotes/ElizabethII ascended to the throne, she was proclaimed to be the independent queen of over a dozen independent monarchies (i.e.; Queen of Australia of the Australian monarchy), rather than the imperial British queen. Commonwealth countries now frequently retcon old British monarchs in this way ("Former Kings of Canada") which further muddles the evolution of the relationship. Furthermore, the queen's regnal name in all the countries she reigns over is 'Elizabeth II'. With the possible exception of Canada (there was a tiny English settlement in Canada during Elizabeth I's reign), she is the first monarch called Elizabeth in all her countries except Britain itself (and even that doesn't hold true in Scotland).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The US college ranks also have a few examples:
** The UsefulNotes/{{NCAA}} Division I men's basketball tournament was first held in 1939, well before the NCAA split into divisions. However, that 1939 edition wasn't organized by the NCAA, but instead by the trade association for college men's coaches, the National Association of Basketball Coaches. The NCAA took over the event the following year, and recognized the 1939 NABC championship as its own.
** In some other sports, the NCAA treats championship events organized by other bodies as part of its official records. The most notable example is in men's golf, in which a national collegiate championship has been held since 1897–nine years before the NCAA was founded. This championship was organized by a body last known as the National Intercollegiate Golf Association. In 1939, the NCAA took over the event, and recognizes the pre-1939 championships as its own—including those from the era before the NCAA itself existed.[[note]]Because of this retcon, Yale is officially recognized as the Division I FCS (second level of college football) school with the most NCAA team championships across all sports, despite ''20'' of its 29 "NCAA" titles being pre-1939 NIGA golf titles. Among FCS schools, Villanova has the most titles actually awarded by the NCAA.[[/note]]

to:

* The US college ranks also have a few examples:
**
The UsefulNotes/{{NCAA}} has a few other examples:
** The
Division I men's basketball tournament was first held in 1939, well before the NCAA split into divisions. However, that 1939 edition wasn't organized by the NCAA, but instead by the trade association for college men's coaches, the National Association of Basketball Coaches. The NCAA took over the event the following year, and recognized the 1939 NABC championship as its own.
** In some other sports, the NCAA treats championship events organized by other bodies as part of its official records. The most notable example is in men's golf, in which a national collegiate championship has been held since 1897–nine years before the NCAA itself was founded. This championship was organized by a body last known as the National Intercollegiate Golf Association. In 1939, the NCAA took over the event, and recognizes the pre-1939 championships as its own—including those from the era before the NCAA itself existed.[[note]]Because of this retcon, Yale is officially recognized as the Division I FCS (second level of college football) school with the most NCAA team championships across all sports, despite ''20'' of its 29 "NCAA" titles being pre-1939 NIGA golf titles. Among FCS schools, Villanova has the most titles actually awarded by the NCAA.[[/note]]

Added: 2359

Changed: 23

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Some NCAA retcons.


*** However, an informal consensus emerged in most media (especially those that don't televise NASCAR) to use just "Cup Series" when discussing past races in the top series. This became official starting in 2020, when NASCAR adopted a new sponsorship model in which the top series is called the "Cup Series", with four companies as primary sponsors but none having their name on the series itself. Similarly, the third-level Gander RV & Outdoors Truck Series is typically known generically as the "Truck Series" (since all of that series' names have ended with those two words). The second-level series, however, holds to this trope, with the then-current name (now "Xfinity Series") typically used even in historic references. The term "Buschwhackers" (referring to Cup Series teams that race the secondary series for more track time), referring to its former name of the Busch Series, is still common though, although later fans used the term "Cup leech" for a more sponsor-neutral terminology.

to:

*** However, an informal consensus emerged in most media (especially those that don't televise NASCAR) to use just "Cup Series" when discussing past races in the top series. This became official starting in 2020, when NASCAR adopted a new sponsorship model in which the top series is called the "Cup Series", with four companies as primary sponsors but none having their name on the series itself. Similarly, the third-level Gander RV & Outdoors Camping World Truck Series is typically known generically as the "Truck Series" (since all of that series' names have ended with those two words). The second-level series, however, holds to this trope, with the then-current name (now "Xfinity Series") typically used even in historic references. The term "Buschwhackers" (referring to Cup Series teams that race the secondary series for more track time), referring to its former name of the Busch Series, is still common though, although later fans used the term "Cup leech" for a more sponsor-neutral terminology.terminology.
* The US college ranks also have a few examples:
** The UsefulNotes/{{NCAA}} Division I men's basketball tournament was first held in 1939, well before the NCAA split into divisions. However, that 1939 edition wasn't organized by the NCAA, but instead by the trade association for college men's coaches, the National Association of Basketball Coaches. The NCAA took over the event the following year, and recognized the 1939 NABC championship as its own.
** In some other sports, the NCAA treats championship events organized by other bodies as part of its official records. The most notable example is in men's golf, in which a national collegiate championship has been held since 1897–nine years before the NCAA was founded. This championship was organized by a body last known as the National Intercollegiate Golf Association. In 1939, the NCAA took over the event, and recognizes the pre-1939 championships as its own—including those from the era before the NCAA itself existed.[[note]]Because of this retcon, Yale is officially recognized as the Division I FCS (second level of college football) school with the most NCAA team championships across all sports, despite ''20'' of its 29 "NCAA" titles being pre-1939 NIGA golf titles. Among FCS schools, Villanova has the most titles actually awarded by the NCAA.[[/note]]
** The Big East Conference split into three blocs in 2013 along [[UsefulNotes/CollegiateAmericanFootball football]] lines. One group of three schools moved to the Atlantic Coast Conference, one of the conferences now considered part of the so-called [[UsefulNotes/CollegiateAmericanFootballPower5Conferences Power Five]]. A second group, consisting of schools that didn't sponsor FBS (top-level) football, essentially said "ScrewThisImOuttaHere" and left to form their own non-football conference, buying the "Big East" name. The third group stayed in the conference structure under the new name of American Athletic Conference. The retcon: the current Big East considers itself the athletic successor of the original conference in all sports that it sponsors, and The American goes along with this. (Interestingly, this means that the pre-2013 histories of Big East football and women's rowing—the two sports that were sponsored by the pre-2013 Big East and remain sponsored by The American—are not recognized by ''either'' conference.)

Top