Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Recap / LawAndOrderS14E1Bodies

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SlipperySlopeFallacy: Schwimmer's reason for his staunch resolve in not revealing where Bruner hid the bodies of his victims. Even though he is told no one would hold it against him for doing the right thing, Schwimmer argues breaking lawyer ethics is a slippery slope that will lead to worse justifications in the future. The jury, however, doesn't agree with Schwimmer's plight and convict him as an accessory for his ethical silence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* KickThe Dog:

to:

* KickThe Dog: KickTheDog:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* KickThe Dog:
** Bruner has no reason to refuse to reveal where he hid the bodies of the girls he raped and murdered, other than he enjoys the fact he can refuse to give the families closure.
** Bruner later says the only way he'd consider admitting where the bodies were was only after [=McCoy=] has retired, if only so he can make sure [=McCoy=] can receive no credit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also defied by Bruner's first attorney, Jessica Sheets. She's defended some downright horrible clients, but always does her job as best she can. Bruner ''terrifies'' her to the point that she immediately begins taking action to get herself removed from the case, correctly pointing out to the prosecutors that she can't defend someone she's that scared of. It's also all but stated that Bruner threatened her life, but the ''reason'' it's all but stated is that Sheets refuses to state it herself because she doesn't want to break privilege.

to:

** Also defied by Bruner's first attorney, Jessica Sheets. She's defended some downright horrible clients, but that's her job and she always does her job as the best she can.can for them. Bruner ''terrifies'' her to the point that she immediately begins taking action to get herself removed from the case, correctly pointing out to the prosecutors that she can't defend someone she's that scared of. It's also all but stated that Bruner threatened her life, but the ''reason'' it's all but stated is that Sheets refuses to state it herself because she doesn't want to break privilege.



* EveryoneHasStandards: Jessica Sheets gets assigned some downright horrific cases through legal aid, up to and including an eleven-year-old child who decapitated his mother for no apparent reason, and gives every single case the best defense she possibly can because that's her job. Even she flat-out refuses to defend Mark Bruner; she desperately tries to get the prosecution to plead his case out, and when they refuse she cuts to the point and more or less begs them not to oppose her motion to be recused.

to:

* EveryoneHasStandards: Jessica Sheets gets assigned some downright horrific cases through legal aid, up to and including an eleven-year-old child who decapitated his mother for no apparent reason, and gives every single case the best defense she possibly can because that's her job. Even she flat-out refuses to defend Mark Bruner; she desperately tries to get the prosecution to plead his case out, and when they refuse won't deal she cuts to the point and more or less begs them not to oppose her motion to be recused.



* SerialKiller: Mark Bruner has raped and strangled at least 17 teenage girls.

to:

* SerialKiller: Mark Bruner has raped and strangled at least 17 seventeen teenage girls.

Added: 234

Changed: 147

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AmoralAttorney: Played with. Schwimmer isn't evil, but his sense of duty to his client goes way beyond the point of reason. To wit, Bruner gleefully sold him out to the prosecution and Schwimmer ''still'' feels protecting his secret is worth going to prison over. He tries in vain to convince the jury he is the good guy, but is convicted on all counts.

to:

* AmoralAttorney: Played with. Schwimmer isn't evil, but his sense of duty to his client goes way beyond the point of reason. To wit, Bruner gleefully sold him out to the prosecution and Schwimmer ''still'' feels protecting his secret is worth going to prison over.over, even though it's pointed out to him that at this point keeping quiet has literally no benefit for himself or his client. He tries in vain to convince the jury he is the good guy, but is convicted on all counts.



** On the prosecution side, [=McCoy=] can't in good conscience plead out Mark Bruner knowing the evidence against him, but he stands with Jessica in front of the judge when she files to be relieved from the case and refuses to oppose.



** Subverted with Jessica Sheets, the attorney on the case before Schwimmer. She basically defends the scum of the earth for a living, but even she's terrified of Mark Bruner, to the point that she motions to recuse herself when it becomes clear that the prosecutors won't plead him out.

to:

** Subverted with Jessica Sheets, the attorney on the case before Schwimmer. She basically says herself that she defends the "the scum of the earth earth" for a living, but even she's terrified of Mark Bruner, to the point that she motions to recuse herself when it becomes clear that the prosecutors won't plead him out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HalfwayPlotSwitch: Starts as a search for a missing teenage girl, then becomes an issue of how far the Attorney-Client privilege goes.

to:

* HalfwayPlotSwitch: Starts as the investigation into the murder of a search for a missing teenage girl, then becomes an issue of how far the Attorney-Client privilege goes.



* WouldHurtAChild: Mark Bruner's victims were all teenage girls.

to:

* WouldHurtAChild: Mark Bruner's victims were all teenage girls.girls of the high school or early college age.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


While investigating the disappearance of a teenage girl, Briscoe and Green discover her case mirrors similar ones involving other young teens and women. The connecting thread is that they were all out at night far from them their residences, needing taxis to get home. The trail leads them to Mark Bruner, a loner who lives in a squalid apartment. After a tense moment with a knife where he may or may not have been trying to provoke the detectives, he is arrested. His DNA matches on two victims and he is identified by a witness in a lineup, leading to his arrest on two counts of rape and first-degree murder.

to:

While investigating the disappearance murder of a teenage girl, Briscoe and Green discover her case mirrors similar ones involving other young teens and women. women who vanished. The connecting thread is that they were all out at night far from them their residences, needing taxis to get home. The trail leads them to Mark Bruner, a loner who lives in a squalid apartment. After a tense moment with a knife where he may or may not have been trying to provoke the detectives, he is arrested. His DNA matches on two victims and he is identified by a witness in a lineup, leading to his arrest on two counts of rape and first-degree murder.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** What exactly Bruner told his first lawyer that made her freak out. It’s strongly implied to be either the location of the other bodies or a threat on her life, but never confirmed. Given how he tells Serena he wishes she got into his cab, it could have been along those lines as well.

to:

** What exactly Bruner told his first lawyer that made her freak out. It’s It's strongly implied to be either the location of the other bodies or a threat on her life, but never confirmed.she cites privilege and refuses to confirm exactly what was said. Given how he tells Serena he wishes she got into his cab, it could have been along those lines as well.



** The episode is a dramatization of [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buried_Bodies_Case the case of Robert Garrow Sr.]]. In that case, he two defense attorneys were cleared of legal and ethical charges. The fact pattern is taught at every level of law school ethics education and was part of the plan for the model attorney ethics code. Given that the real life events took place in the 70s, there is no way Jack or Serena wouldn’t have known the ethics of the situation.

to:

** The episode is a dramatization of [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buried_Bodies_Case the case of Robert Garrow Sr.]]. In that case, he the two defense attorneys were cleared of legal and ethical charges. The fact pattern is taught at every level of law school ethics education and was part of the plan for the model attorney ethics code. Given that the real life events took place in the 70s, there is no way Jack or Serena wouldn’t have known the ethics of the situation.



** Subverted with Jessica Sheets, the attorney on the case before Schwimmer. She basically defends the scum of the earth for a living, but even she's terrified of Mark Bruner, to the point that she refuses to defend him.
* NotAfraidToDie: Part of the reason Bruner refuses to disclose the location of his victims' bodies. He doesn't view dying in prison as any better than the death penalty, knows full well that there's not much else they can offer him as incentive, and is thus indifferent to [=McCoy=]'s plea offers.

to:

** Subverted with Jessica Sheets, the attorney on the case before Schwimmer. She basically defends the scum of the earth for a living, but even she's terrified of Mark Bruner, to the point that she refuses motions to defend him.
recuse herself when it becomes clear that the prosecutors won't plead him out.
* NotAfraidToDie: Part of the reason Bruner refuses to disclose the location of his victims' bodies. He doesn't view dying in prison as any better than the death penalty, knows full well that there's not much else of anything they can or are even willing to offer him as incentive, and is thus indifferent to [=McCoy=]'s plea offers.



** Schwimmer gets this from all sides for keeping the location of the bodies secret. On the stand, [=McCoy=] reminds him Bruner has been convicted and has two death sentences. At worst, this means Bruner just gets more of them. At best, it is inadmissible against him but he is already in prison until he dies anyway.

to:

** Schwimmer gets this from all sides for keeping the location of the bodies secret. On the stand, [=McCoy=] reminds him Bruner has been convicted and has two death sentences. At worst, this means Bruner just gets more of them. At best, it is inadmissible against him him, but he is he's already spending life in prison until he dies anyway.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


His initial public defender, a woman, is extremely uncomfortable defending him, even by her usual standard of clients, who include an eleven-year-old who decapitated his mother and a mass shooter. Sympathetic to her plight considering what her client is accused of, though noting there is something she seems to be hiding, [=McCoy=] doesn’t fight her petition to be removed as Bruner’s counsel. Tim Schwimmer, an enthusiastic young defender is assigned to replace her. He unsuccessfully asks Serena out, then gets a small win in court getting the identification thrown out on an obscure technicality. The DNA is still enough to convict Bruner and [=McCoy=] offers a deal of life if Bruner confesses, agreeing to take the Death Penalty off the table. Bruner, not caring whether he lives or dies, decides to toy with the [=DAs=] office. He reveals he has way more than two bodies to his name and even has them in storage. When [=McCoy=] asks for verification, Bruner, ignoring Schwimmer’s pleas to stay silent, reveals he not only told his attorney, but his lawyer went and verified the story himself. Schwimmer admits this is true, but is adamant in not revealing the location, claiming he cannot violate Attorney-Client privilege.

to:

His initial public defender, a woman, Jessica Sheets, is extremely uncomfortable defending him, even by her usual standard of clients, who include an eleven-year-old who decapitated his mother and a mass shooter. Sympathetic to her plight considering what her client is accused of, though noting there is something she seems to be hiding, [=McCoy=] doesn’t fight her petition to be removed as Bruner’s counsel. Tim Schwimmer, an enthusiastic young defender is assigned to replace her. He unsuccessfully asks Serena out, then gets a small win in court getting the identification thrown out on an obscure technicality. The DNA is still enough to convict Bruner and [=McCoy=] offers a deal of life if Bruner confesses, agreeing to take the Death Penalty off the table. Bruner, not caring whether he lives or dies, decides to toy with the [=DAs=] office. He reveals he has way more than two bodies to his name and even has them in storage. When [=McCoy=] asks for verification, Bruner, ignoring Schwimmer’s pleas to stay silent, reveals he not only told his attorney, but his lawyer went and verified the story himself. Schwimmer admits this is true, but is adamant in not revealing the location, claiming he cannot violate Attorney-Client privilege.



** What exactly Bruner told his first lawyer that made her freak out. It’s strongly implied to be the location of the other bodies, but never confirmed. Given how he tells Serena he wishes she got into his cab, it could have been along those lines as well.

to:

** What exactly Bruner told his first lawyer that made her freak out. It’s strongly implied to be either the location of the other bodies, bodies or a threat on her life, but never confirmed. Given how he tells Serena he wishes she got into his cab, it could have been along those lines as well.



* EvenEvilHasStandards: Played with. Bruner's first lawyer is far from evil, but admits she gets assigned the worst clients by Legal Aid because she is willing to give them the best defense possible. That said, while willing to defend a child who killed his mother and a mass shooter, Bruner is too evil for her to defend. The implied psychological torture doesn't help either.

to:

* EvenEvilHasStandards: Played with. Bruner's first lawyer is far from evil, but admits she EveryoneHasStandards: Jessica Sheets gets assigned the worst clients by Legal Aid because she is willing some downright horrific cases through legal aid, up to give them and including an eleven-year-old child who decapitated his mother for no apparent reason, and gives every single case the best defense possible. That said, while willing she possibly can because that's her job. Even she flat-out refuses to defend a child who killed Mark Bruner; she desperately tries to get the prosecution to plead his mother case out, and a mass shooter, Bruner is too evil for when they refuse she cuts to the point and more or less begs them not to oppose her motion to defend. The implied psychological torture doesn't help either. be recused.



** Subverted with Jessica Sheets, the attorney on the case before Schwimmer. She basically defends the scum of the earth for a living, but even she refuses to defend Mark Bruner after he threatens her life.

to:

** Subverted with Jessica Sheets, the attorney on the case before Schwimmer. She basically defends the scum of the earth for a living, but even she's terrified of Mark Bruner, to the point that she refuses to defend Mark Bruner after he threatens her life.him.

Added: 842

Changed: 357

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also defied by Bruner's first attorney, Jessica Sheets. She's defended some downright horrible clients, but always does her job as best she can. Bruner ''terrifies'' her to the point that she immediately begins taking action to get herself removed from the case, correctly pointing out to the prosecutors that she can't defend someone she's that scared of. It's also all but stated that Bruner threatened her life, but the ''reason'' it's all but stated is that Sheets refuses to state it herself because she doesn't want to break privilege.



* NotAfraidToDie: Part of the reason Bruner refuses to disclose the location of his victims' bodies. He doesn't view dying in prison as any better than the death penalty, and is thus indifferent to [=McCoy=]'s plea deals.

to:

** Subverted with Jessica Sheets, the attorney on the case before Schwimmer. She basically defends the scum of the earth for a living, but even she refuses to defend Mark Bruner after he threatens her life.
* NotAfraidToDie: Part of the reason Bruner refuses to disclose the location of his victims' bodies. He doesn't view dying in prison as any better than the death penalty, knows full well that there's not much else they can offer him as incentive, and is thus indifferent to [=McCoy=]'s plea deals.offers.



* TakeAThirdOption: Averted. Schwimmer won't consider anonymously leaking the location to the press or police to get out of his situation.

to:

* TakeAThirdOption: Averted. Defied; Schwimmer won't refuses to consider anonymously leaking the location to the press or police to get out of his situation.



** As much as she dislikes Bruner and Schwimmer, she thinks [=McCoy=] prosecuting the latter is going to far. She even considers the conviction a loss, since Schwimmer remains mute.

to:

** As much as she Serena dislikes Bruner and Schwimmer, she thinks [=McCoy=] prosecuting the latter is going to too far. She even considers the conviction a loss, since Schwimmer remains mute.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AxCrazy: Mark Bruner. As if his murders weren't enough of an indication, he's also very stunted and creepy in his interviews, not reacting to the detectives' comments or giggling at inappropriate times.



* GigglingVillain: Bruner is constantly cracking up during his meetings with the district attorneys.



* NotAfraidToDie: Part of the reason Bruner refuses to disclose the location of his victims' bodies. He doesn't view dying in prison as any better than the death penalty, and is thus indifferent to [=McCoy=]'s plea deals.



* SerialKiller: Mark Bruner has raped and strangled at least 17 teenage girls.



* TheSociopath: Mark Bruner is an obvious example, being a serial killer who eventually decides to use the bodies of his victims to manipulate the district attorneys for shits and giggles.



** Schwimmer gets this from all sides for keeping the location of the bodies secret. On the stand, [=McCoy=] reminds him Bruner has been convicted and has two death sentences. At worst, this means Bruner just gets more of them. At best, it is inadmissible against him but he is already in prison until he dies anyway.

to:

** Schwimmer gets this from all sides for keeping the location of the bodies secret. On the stand, [=McCoy=] reminds him Bruner has been convicted and has two death sentences. At worst, this means Bruner just gets more of them. At best, it is inadmissible against him but he is already in prison until he dies anyway.anyway.
* WouldHurtAChild: Mark Bruner's victims were all teenage girls.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** That said, in the Garrow case the lawyers were tried with violating health codes by not reporting the location of the decompoing bodies. Here, Schwimmer is charged with being an accessory since he had to lock and re-lock the location, a novel legal maneuver that is challenged unsuccessfully by his attorney.

to:

** That said, in the Garrow case the lawyers were tried with violating health codes by not reporting the location of the decompoing bodies. Here, Schwimmer is charged with being an accessory since he had to lock unlock and re-lock the location, a novel legal maneuver that is challenged unsuccessfully by his attorney.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


While investigating the disappearance of a teenage girl, Briscoe and Green discover her case mirrors similar ones involving other young teens and women. The connecting thread is that they were all out at night far from them their homes, needing taxis to get home. The trail leads them to Mark Bruner, a loner who lives in a squalid apartment. After a tense moment with a knife where he may or may not have been trying to provoke the detectives, he is arrested. His DNA matches on two victims and he is identified by a witness in a lineup, leading to his arrest on two counts of rape and first-degree murder.

His initial public defender, a woman, is extremely uncomfortable defending him, even by her usual standard of clients, who include an eleven-year-old who decapitated his mother and a mass shooter. Sympathetic to her plight considering what her client is accused of, though noting there is something she seems to be hiding, [=McCoy=] doesn’t fight her petition to be removed as Bruner’s counsel. Tim Schwimmer, an enthusiastic young defender is assigned to replace her. He unsuccessfully asks Serena out, then gets a small win in court getting the identification thrown out on an obscure technicality. The DNA is still enough to convict Bruner and [=McCoy=] offers a deal of life if Bruner confesses, agreeing to take the Death Penalty off the table.
Bruner, not caring whether he lives or dies, decides to toy with the [=DAs=] office. He reveals he has way more than two bodies to his name and even has them in storage. When [=McCoy=] asks for verification, Bruner, ignoring Schwimmer’s pleas to stay silent, reveals he not only told his attorney, but his lawyer went and verified the story himself. Schwimmer admits this is true, but is adamant in not revealing the location, claiming he cannot violate Attorney-Client privilege.

to:

While investigating the disappearance of a teenage girl, Briscoe and Green discover her case mirrors similar ones involving other young teens and women. The connecting thread is that they were all out at night far from them their homes, residences, needing taxis to get home. The trail leads them to Mark Bruner, a loner who lives in a squalid apartment. After a tense moment with a knife where he may or may not have been trying to provoke the detectives, he is arrested. His DNA matches on two victims and he is identified by a witness in a lineup, leading to his arrest on two counts of rape and first-degree murder.

His initial public defender, a woman, is extremely uncomfortable defending him, even by her usual standard of clients, who include an eleven-year-old who decapitated his mother and a mass shooter. Sympathetic to her plight considering what her client is accused of, though noting there is something she seems to be hiding, [=McCoy=] doesn’t fight her petition to be removed as Bruner’s counsel. Tim Schwimmer, an enthusiastic young defender is assigned to replace her. He unsuccessfully asks Serena out, then gets a small win in court getting the identification thrown out on an obscure technicality. The DNA is still enough to convict Bruner and [=McCoy=] offers a deal of life if Bruner confesses, agreeing to take the Death Penalty off the table.
table. Bruner, not caring whether he lives or dies, decides to toy with the [=DAs=] office. He reveals he has way more than two bodies to his name and even has them in storage. When [=McCoy=] asks for verification, Bruner, ignoring Schwimmer’s pleas to stay silent, reveals he not only told his attorney, but his lawyer went and verified the story himself. Schwimmer admits this is true, but is adamant in not revealing the location, claiming he cannot violate Attorney-Client privilege.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* EvenEvilHasStandards: Played with. Bruner's first lawyer is far from evil, but admits she gets assigned the worst clients by Legal Aid because she is willing to give them the best defense she can give them. That said, while willing to defend a child who killed his mother and a mass shooter, Bruner is too evil for her to defend. The implied psychological torture doesn't help either.

to:

* EvenEvilHasStandards: Played with. Bruner's first lawyer is far from evil, but admits she gets assigned the worst clients by Legal Aid because she is willing to give them the best defense she can give them.possible. That said, while willing to defend a child who killed his mother and a mass shooter, Bruner is too evil for her to defend. The implied psychological torture doesn't help either.

Added: 238

Removed: 180

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Dramatization: Not quite ripped from the headlines, given the timing involved, but the story is a clear [[dramatization]] of the famous hidden bodies case in New York in the 70s.


Added DiffLines:

* RippedFromTheHeadlines: Not quite ripped from the ''recent'' headlines, given the timing involved, but the story is a clear dramatization of the famous hidden bodies case in New York in the 70s (see ArtisticLicenseLaw above for a link).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Schwimmer's conviction means he is automatically disbarred, so he is no longer held by privilege. This isn't brought up, but in both the real world and the L&O world, it would be uncharted waters. The episode ends with [=McCoy=] and Serena disagreeing on whether Schwimmer with break.

to:

** Schwimmer's conviction means he is automatically disbarred, so he is no longer held by privilege. This isn't brought up, but Lawyers sent to prison can't be forced to break with their past cases, unless they were sent to prison as part of a conspiracy in both a particular case. Even then, they only have to talk about the real world and the L&O world, it would be uncharted waters. case they were convicted in, which is exactly what happens to Schwimmer. The episode ends with [=McCoy=] and Serena disagreeing on whether Schwimmer with break.will break, rather than Schwimmer being forced to talk.

Added: 1069

Changed: 506

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenseLaw: The way Attorney-Client privilege is handled is one of the biggest examples in the series. The episode is a [[dramatization]] of real life events. In real life the two defense attorneys were acquitted at trial, and the acquittal was upheld. They were investigated by the bar association of New York and their conduct was upheld. The fact pattern is taught at every level of law school ethics education and was part of the plan for the model attorney ethics code. Given that the real life events took place in the 70s, there is no way Jack or Serina wouldn’t have known the ethics of the situation.

to:

* ArtisticLicenseLaw: The way Attorney-Client privilege is handled is one of the biggest examples in the series.
**
The episode is a [[dramatization]] dramatization of real life events. In real life [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buried_Bodies_Case the case of Robert Garrow Sr.]]. In that case, he two defense attorneys were acquitted at trial, cleared of legal and the acquittal was upheld. They were investigated by the bar association of New York and their conduct was upheld.ethical charges. The fact pattern is taught at every level of law school ethics education and was part of the plan for the model attorney ethics code. Given that the real life events took place in the 70s, there is no way Jack or Serina Serena wouldn’t have known the ethics of the situation.situation.
** That said, in the Garrow case the lawyers were tried with violating health codes by not reporting the location of the decompoing bodies. Here, Schwimmer is charged with being an accessory since he had to lock and re-lock the location, a novel legal maneuver that is challenged unsuccessfully by his attorney.
** Schwimmer's conviction means he is automatically disbarred, so he is no longer held by privilege. This isn't brought up, but in both the real world and the L&O world, it would be uncharted waters. The episode ends with [=McCoy=] and Serena disagreeing on whether Schwimmer with break.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*Dramatization: Not quite ripped from the headlines, given the timing involved, but the story is a clear [[dramatization]] of the famous hidden bodies case in New York in the 70s.

Changed: 514

Removed: 1031

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenseLaw: The way Attorney-Client privilege is handled is one of the biggest examples in the series. Of course [[TropesAreTools this isn’t a bad thing]] per se, but it here is how it is played with here:
** To start, Bruner’s first lawyer hints that Bruner told her about the bodies. Both she and Schwimmer are ''not'' bound by the privilege by this; they were assigned to defend him on the two counts the police knew about. If a defendant tells their attorney about new crimes, even ones related to their current charge, they are obligated to report it.
** Any lawyer who passes the bar should know that they are obligated to warn their client they can only keep information pertinent to the case secret. If Bruner started to brag about the other murders, they should have told him to keep quiet. This conflict is never addressed.
** Once Schwimmer was convicted, he would be automatically disbarred. Legally, there would be no way for him to claim privilege anymore and [=McCoy=] would not have to wait to see if prison would open his mouth. Lawyers who are sent to prison cannot be forced to break privilege for every case they worked on, but lawyers who are convicted as part of a conspiracy, as Schwimmer was, can be forced to talk.

to:

* ArtisticLicenseLaw: The way Attorney-Client privilege is handled is one of the biggest examples in the series. Of course [[TropesAreTools this isn’t a bad thing]] per se, but it here The episode is how it is played with here:
** To start, Bruner’s first lawyer hints that Bruner told her about the bodies. Both she and Schwimmer are ''not'' bound by the privilege by this; they were assigned to defend him on
a [[dramatization]] of real life events. In real life the two counts defense attorneys were acquitted at trial, and the police knew about. If a defendant tells acquittal was upheld. They were investigated by the bar association of New York and their conduct was upheld. The fact pattern is taught at every level of law school ethics education and was part of the plan for the model attorney about new crimes, even ones related to their current charge, they are obligated to report it.
** Any lawyer who passes the bar should know
ethics code. Given that they are obligated to warn their client they can only keep information pertinent to the case secret. If Bruner started to brag about real life events took place in the other murders, they should have told him to keep quiet. This conflict is never addressed.
** Once Schwimmer was convicted, he would be automatically disbarred. Legally,
70s, there would be is no way for him to claim privilege anymore and [=McCoy=] would not Jack or Serina wouldn’t have to wait to see if prison would open his mouth. Lawyers who are sent to prison cannot be forced to break privilege for every case they worked on, but lawyers who are convicted as part known the ethics of a conspiracy, as Schwimmer was, can be forced to talk.the situation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SpottingTheThread: Briscoe and Green realize that their initial victim and the others with the same M.O. all had night time activities that required them ti use taxis. This leads them to Bruner whom they arrest.

to:

* SpottingTheThread: Briscoe and Green realize that their initial victim and the others with the same M.O. all had night time activities that required them ti to use taxis. This leads them to Bruner whom they arrest.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BunnyEarsLawyer: Schwimmer certainly has an interesting code of ethics, clumsily hits on Serena and got his degree at night school. On the other hand he was good enough to get promoted to a murder case at Legal Aid and he wins a suppression hearing and gets the lineup tossed out, but admits he didn't even think it would work. When Branch finds out what he did with the secret location, he refers to the young man as an idiot.

to:

* BunnyEarsLawyer: Schwimmer certainly has an interesting code of ethics, clumsily hits on Serena and got his degree at night school. On the other hand hand, he was good enough to get promoted to a murder case at Legal Aid and Aid, he wins a suppression hearing and gets the lineup tossed out, but admits he didn't even think it his argument would work. When Branch finds out what he did with the secret location, he refers to the young man as an idiot.

Changed: 154

Removed: 29

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Teleplay By
William N. Fordes

Story By
William N. Fordes & Michael S. Chernuchin

Directed By
Constantine Makris

to:

Teleplay By
By William N. Fordes

Story By
By William N. Fordes & Michael S. Chernuchin

Directed By
By Constantine Makris
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WhatTheHellHero?:

to:

* WhatTheHellHero?: WhatTheHellHero:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AmoralAttorney: Played with. Schwimmer isn't evil, but his sense of duty to his client goes way beyond the point of reason. To wit, Bruner gleefully sold him out to the prosecution and Schwimmer ''still'' feels protecting his secret is worth going to prison over. He tries in vain to convince the jury he is the good guy, but is convicted on all counts.


Added DiffLines:

* BunnyEarsLawyer: Schwimmer certainly has an interesting code of ethics, clumsily hits on Serena and got his degree at night school. On the other hand he was good enough to get promoted to a murder case at Legal Aid and he wins a suppression hearing and gets the lineup tossed out, but admits he didn't even think it would work. When Branch finds out what he did with the secret location, he refers to the young man as an idiot.
* EvenEvilHasStandards: Played with. Bruner's first lawyer is far from evil, but admits she gets assigned the worst clients by Legal Aid because she is willing to give them the best defense she can give them. That said, while willing to defend a child who killed his mother and a mass shooter, Bruner is too evil for her to defend. The implied psychological torture doesn't help either.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Any Lawyer who passes the bar should know that they are obligated to warn their client they can only keep information pertinent to the case secret. If Bruner started to brag about the other murders, they should have told him to keep quiet. This conflict is never addressed.

to:

** Any Lawyer lawyer who passes the bar should know that they are obligated to warn their client they can only keep information pertinent to the case secret. If Bruner started to brag about the other murders, they should have told him to keep quiet. This conflict is never addressed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Teleplay By
William N. Fordes

Story By
William N. Fordes & Michael S. Chernuchin

Directed By
Constantine Makris

While investigating the disappearance of a teenage girl, Briscoe and Green discover her case mirrors similar ones involving other young teens and women. The connecting thread is that they were all out at night far from them their homes, needing taxis to get home. The trail leads them to Mark Bruner, a loner who lives in a squalid apartment. After a tense moment with a knife where he may or may not have been trying to provoke the detectives, he is arrested. His DNA matches on two victims and he is identified by a witness in a lineup, leading to his arrest on two counts of rape and first-degree murder.

His initial public defender, a woman, is extremely uncomfortable defending him, even by her usual standard of clients, who include an eleven-year-old who decapitated his mother and a mass shooter. Sympathetic to her plight considering what her client is accused of, though noting there is something she seems to be hiding, [=McCoy=] doesn’t fight her petition to be removed as Bruner’s counsel. Tim Schwimmer, an enthusiastic young defender is assigned to replace her. He unsuccessfully asks Serena out, then gets a small win in court getting the identification thrown out on an obscure technicality. The DNA is still enough to convict Bruner and [=McCoy=] offers a deal of life if Bruner confesses, agreeing to take the Death Penalty off the table.
Bruner, not caring whether he lives or dies, decides to toy with the [=DAs=] office. He reveals he has way more than two bodies to his name and even has them in storage. When [=McCoy=] asks for verification, Bruner, ignoring Schwimmer’s pleas to stay silent, reveals he not only told his attorney, but his lawyer went and verified the story himself. Schwimmer admits this is true, but is adamant in not revealing the location, claiming he cannot violate Attorney-Client privilege.

The story is leaked to the media, creating a public outcry and mass protests outside Legal Aid, but Schwimmer will not talk without Bruner’s permission. Bruner, enjoying the chaos, refuses even after being offered a deal that allows parole after twenty-five years, knowing it will never be granted. Outside Rikers, [=McCoy=] has a revelation: Bruner mentioned the bodies are under “lock and key” which means that Schwimmer became an accessory by unlocking the site then re-locking it once he finished. He has Schwimmer arrested, charged with over ten counts of accessory after the fact.

The trial goes extremely poorly for Schwimmer, as [=McCoy=] uses a parade of distraught parents of missing young women to condemn the young attorney for his actions. On the stand, Schwimmer tries to convince the jury that he must remain silent or the legal system risks falling apart. When [=McCoy=] points out Bruner has already been convicted of two murders and sentenced to death, so revealing the location can’t make his situation any worse, Schwimmer still refuses to budge. The jury convicts quickly, but Schwimmer remains stoic and defiant. [=McCoy=] is convinced a week in Rikers will convince Schwimmer to talk; Serena isn’t so sure, but [=McCoy=] remains hopeful.

!!!This episode contains examples of:
*AmbiguousSituation:
** If Bruner was trying to provoke the detectives into killing him. His body language and behavior seems to imply he know he has been caught and that drawing a large knife would keep him from prison. On the other hand, he quickly complies with the order to drop the weapon; this could be a sign he changed his mind and wanted to use his secret location as a means to cause further pain.
** What exactly Bruner told his first lawyer that made her freak out. It’s strongly implied to be the location of the other bodies, but never confirmed. Given how he tells Serena he wishes she got into his cab, it could have been along those lines as well.
**If Schwimmer ends up talking. He is certainly not the type of person who looks like he will do well in prison and if [=McCoy=] is willing to void his conviction he may finally give up. On the other hand, he is a prime example of TheDeterminator.
* ArtisticLicenseLaw: The way Attorney-Client privilege is handled is one of the biggest examples in the series. Of course [[TropesAreTools this isn’t a bad thing]] per se, but it here is how it is played with here:
** To start, Bruner’s first lawyer hints that Bruner told her about the bodies. Both she and Schwimmer are ''not'' bound by the privilege by this; they were assigned to defend him on the two counts the police knew about. If a defendant tells their attorney about new crimes, even ones related to their current charge, they are obligated to report it.
** Any Lawyer who passes the bar should know that they are obligated to warn their client they can only keep information pertinent to the case secret. If Bruner started to brag about the other murders, they should have told him to keep quiet. This conflict is never addressed.
** Once Schwimmer was convicted, he would be automatically disbarred. Legally, there would be no way for him to claim privilege anymore and [=McCoy=] would not have to wait to see if prison would open his mouth. Lawyers who are sent to prison cannot be forced to break privilege for every case they worked on, but lawyers who are convicted as part of a conspiracy, as Schwimmer was, can be forced to talk.
*HalfwayPlotSwitch: Starts as a search for a missing teenage girl, then becomes an issue of how far the Attorney-Client privilege goes.
*HonorBeforeReason: ''Nothing'' will get Schwimmer to break privilege. Not public outrage, not crying mothers, not an arrest, not a ''conviction''. Shortly before the jury convicts, Serena tells him given the heinous nature of the case, no bar association would disbar him for talking. He simply replies “Shame on them.”
* SmugSnake: Bruner, who shows absolutely no remorse for the heinous crimes he has committed. As noted above, he may have changed his SuicideByCop plan in order to cause more pain by holding onto his secret. He also takes glee in revealing what Schwimmer knows, despite his attorney's pleas for his silence. The fact Schwimmer is willing to go to ''prison'' for someone like this makes him seem even more foolish.
* SpottingTheThread: Briscoe and Green realize that their initial victim and the others with the same M.O. all had night time activities that required them ti use taxis. This leads them to Bruner whom they arrest.
*TakeAThirdOption: Averted. Schwimmer won't consider anonymously leaking the location to the press or police to get out of his situation.
*WhatTheHellHero?:
**As much as she dislikes Bruner and Schwimmer, she thinks [=McCoy=] prosecuting the latter is going to far. She even considers the conviction a loss, since Schwimmer remains mute.
**Schwimmer gets this from all sides for keeping the location of the bodies secret. On the stand, [=McCoy=] reminds him Bruner has been convicted and has two death sentences. At worst, this means Bruner just gets more of them. At best, it is inadmissible against him but he is already in prison until he dies anyway.

Top