Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / TaxonomicTermConfusion

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I know it doesn't have a page yet, but still

Added DiffLines:

* In ''VideoGame/StickyBusiness'', Bernd S. asks you to make rodent stickers such as rats, rabbits, and capybaras. Rabbits are actually lagomorphs, but are commonly mistaken for rodents.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "[[Recap/PhineasAndFerbWhatACroc What a Croc!]]" refers to crocodiles as lizards. Crocodilians are more closely related to dinosaurs and thus birds, and they are actually far away from lizards on the evolutionary branch.

to:

** "[[Recap/PhineasAndFerbWhatACroc What a Croc!]]" refers to crocodiles as lizards. Crocodilians are more closely related to dinosaurs and thus birds, and they are actually far away from lizards on the evolutionary branch.tree.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
examples need to stand alone


* ''Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog'' is often erroneously referred to as a rodent. Hedgehogs actually belong to the order Eulipotyphla, which indeed contains several ''other'' animals frequently mistaken for rodents (namely moles and shrews). Similarly to the ''WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy'' example (below in the Western Animation folder), hedgehogs and rodents are boreoeutherian mammals, and that's where they diverge: Eulipotyphla is in superorder Laurasiatheria (which contains animals like ungulates and bats), while Rodentia is in superorder Euarchontoglires (which contains animals like rabbits and primates).

to:

* ''Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog'' is often erroneously referred to as a rodent. Hedgehogs actually belong to the order Eulipotyphla, which indeed contains several ''other'' animals frequently mistaken for rodents (namely moles and shrews). Similarly to the ''WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy'' example (below in the Western Animation folder), hedgehogs Hedgehogs and rodents are boreoeutherian mammals, and that's where they diverge: Eulipotyphla is in superorder Laurasiatheria (which contains animals like ungulates and bats), while Rodentia is in superorder Euarchontoglires (which contains animals like rabbits and primates).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* ''WesternAnimation/DinosaurTrain'' uses "species" when "genus" would be more appropriate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Film/GuardiansOfTheGalaxy'', calling Rocket a "rodent" is one of his {{Berserk Button}}s. He's a raccoon, order Carnivora; rodents are order Rodentia.

to:

* In ''Film/GuardiansOfTheGalaxy'', ''Film/GuardiansOfTheGalaxy2014'', calling Rocket a "rodent" is one of his {{Berserk Button}}s. He's a raccoon, order Carnivora; rodents are order Rodentia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Website/NotAlwaysRight: [[https://notalwaysright.com/somebody-took-an-evolutionary-detour/73359/ This customer]] claims chickens to be mammals.

Changed: 1968

Removed: 365

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Badly indented tangent.


* ''ComicBook/XMen'':
** The mutants are referred to as a species separate from humans, called ''Homo superior'', even though they can produce fertile offspring with humans. It would be more accurate to call them a new [[HumanSubspecies subspecies]] ("subspecies" being a fairly arbitrary and flexible term). This is partially solved in later comics where ComicBook/{{Magneto}}, and several others, refer to Mutants as "Homo sapiens superior" (compared to Homo sapiens sapiens). Although some writers forget this, ''Homo sapiens superior'' specifically refers to a human subspecies with a single, quantifiable characteristic that ''Homo sapiens sapiens'' lacks — the emission of a certain type of brainwave (this is how Cerebro distinguishes mutants from baseline humans). Superhuman powers or anatomical quirks are very common among mutants, but they are not a requirement.
** Every human, nay, every individual of any species born is almost certainly a mutant, several times over, by the actual definition of the term. A typical human may have dozens of alleles (that is, genetic variations) not present in either of its parents. These are all mutations. So using the term "mutant" isn't all that scientifically useful, either.
[[/folder]]

to:

* ''ComicBook/XMen'':
**
''ComicBook/XMen'': The mutants are referred to as a species separate from humans, called ''Homo superior'', even though they can produce fertile offspring with humans. It would be more accurate to call them a new [[HumanSubspecies subspecies]] ("subspecies" being a fairly arbitrary and flexible term). This is partially solved in later comics where ComicBook/{{Magneto}}, and several others, refer to Mutants as "Homo sapiens superior" (compared to Homo sapiens sapiens). Although some writers forget this, ''Homo sapiens superior'' specifically refers to a human subspecies with a single, quantifiable characteristic that ''Homo sapiens sapiens'' lacks — the emission of a certain type of brainwave (this is how Cerebro distinguishes mutants from baseline humans). Superhuman powers or anatomical quirks are very common among mutants, but they are not a requirement.
** Every human, nay,
requirement.[[labelnote:About "mutant"]]Just about every individual of any species born is almost certainly a mutant, several times over, organism that has lived has mutations somewhere in its genome, compared to its parents, making them "mutants" by the actual strict definition of the term. A typical human may have dozens of alleles (that is, genetic variations) term, so it's not present in either of its parents. These are all mutations. So using the term "mutant" isn't all that a scientifically useful, either.
useful term anyway.[[/labelnote]] [[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Iridescent Flint Beetles, Iridescent Glint Beetles and Doodlebugs are considered part of three distinct families, respectively the flint beetles, glint beetles and flint bugs. Despite this, they're also referred to as members of the same genus, ''Pilli'' (''P. envelopens'', ''P. auricus'' and ''P. flatularum'', respectively). Notably, however, the Japanese dub describes the Iridescent Flint Beetle and Doodlebug as being part of the same family. Taxonomically, this doesn't make any sense -- species are group into genuses and genuses into families, which means that all members of a genus must be part of the same family.

to:

** Iridescent Flint Beetles, Iridescent Glint Beetles and Doodlebugs are considered part of three distinct families, respectively the flint beetles, glint beetles and flint bugs. Despite this, they're also referred to as members of the same genus, ''Pilli'' (''P. envelopens'', ''P. auricus'' and ''P. flatularum'', respectively). Notably, however, the Japanese dub describes the Iridescent Flint Beetle and Doodlebug as being part of the same family. Taxonomically, this doesn't make any sense -- species are group into genuses and genuses into families, which means that all members of a genus must be part of the same family. Notably, however, the Japanese dub describes the Iridescent Flint Beetle and Doodlebug as being part of the same family.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''VideoGame/{{Pikmin}}'':
** Iridescent Flint Beetles, Iridescent Glint Beetles and Doodlebugs are considered part of three distinct families, respectively the flint beetles, glint beetles and flint bugs. Despite this, they're also referred to as members of the same genus, ''Pilli'' (''P. envelopens'', ''P. auricus'' and ''P. flatularum'', respectively). Notably, however, the Japanese dub describes the Iridescent Flint Beetle and Doodlebug as being part of the same family. Taxonomically, this doesn't make any sense -- species are group into genuses and genuses into families, which means that all members of a genus must be part of the same family.
** The games classify Unmarked, White, Yellow and Electric Spectralids are part of the ''Fenestari'' genus, while Red Spectralids are classified as ''Fenestrati''. However, they're split into multiple families that don't follow genus lines -- Unmarked Spectralids are part of the flitterbie family, the ones from the third game are part of the flutterbie family, and Electric Spectralids are part of the floaterbie family (although the Japanese dubs consider the last two a single group). This is a more extreme version of the beetle example, as besides just splitting one genus across three families this system lumps in some of its species with a member of an entirely different genus -- which, obviously, isn't something that can happen in real life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/{{Fringe}}'': One episode features what looks like a cucumber-sized slug that crawls out of its victim's mouth, which the cast later identifies as an [[MegaMicrobes enlarged]] single-cell cold virus (which don't ''have'' cells, even a single one).

to:

* ''Series/{{Fringe}}'': One The episode "[[Recap/FringeS01E11Bound Bound]]" features what looks like a cucumber-sized slug that crawls out of its victim's mouth, which the cast later identifies as an [[MegaMicrobes enlarged]] single-cell cold virus (which don't ''have'' cells, even a single one).

Added: 1916

Changed: 643

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Literature/{{Dracopedia}}'': The books don't use taxonomic terms precisely as they are meant to be used. Primarily, binomial names are used for both individual species and individual genuses -- in essence, each dragon family is referred to as ''Draco [genus name]'', and each individual species within it is then ''[genus name] [species name]''. For instance, great dragons as a whole are referred to as ''Draco dracorexus'', while the Welsh red, a specific species of great dragon, is ''Dracorexus idraigoxus''. This isn't how binomials work -- only genus, species and subspecies names are included in a species' formal taxonomic name, and anything above that would just be referred to as "[genus species], in family x, in order y", etc.

to:

* ''Literature/{{Dracopedia}}'': The books don't series' use of taxonomic terms precisely as they are meant to be used. is rather messy. Primarily, it confuses genuses and families and assigns binomial names are used for to both individual species and individual genuses/families.
** Firstly, the books sort dragons into broad groups, such as amphipteres, great dragons, hydras and so on, that it calls "families", and then within each family describes specific types that it calls "species". In taxonomy, a "family" is rank used to group together genuses; genuses, in turn, group together species. However, all species within each of the book's families share the first part of their binomial names, which in biology identifies the genus -- all amphipteres are ''Amphipterus [something]'', all great dragons are ''Dracorex [something]'', and so on. Most real families consist of separate genuses[[note]]for example, the real-life family Hominidae includes the
genuses -- in essence, each dragon ''Homo'', ''Pan'', ''Gorilla'' and ''Pongo'', respectively humans, chimps, gorillas and orangutans[[/note]]. Some families do only include a single genus, but this is typically the exception and it stretches credibility that every individual family in the book would be a single-genus one.
** Secondly, each family/genus
is referred to as given an italicized, binomial name in the form of ''Draco [genus name]'', [name]'', and each individual species within it is then ''[genus name] [species ''[Name] [other name]''. For instance, the great dragons dragon "family" as a whole are is referred to as ''Draco dracorexus'', while the Welsh red, a specific species of great dragon, is ''Dracorexus idraigoxus''. This isn't how binomials work In real taxonomies, families do not receive binomial names -- only genus, species and subspecies family names are not italicized, end in -idae[[note]]animal families, at least; plant, algae and fungus families end in -aceae[[/note]] and are not included in a species' formal taxonomic name, the names of the genuses and anything species within them. Anything above that the genus level would just be referred to as "[genus species], "[species x], in family x, y, in order y", z, etc." Assuming that the great dragon family does happen to include a single genus, correct nomenclature would be to call it something like Dracorexidae and then name its individual species ''Dracorex [species name]''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/GodzillaKingOfTheMonsters'': Titans are all classified under the genus ''Titanus''. Titans represent everything from Godzilla (a reptile) to King Kong (a mammal) to Mothra (an insect). While this is already bad enough, what tips this into making taxonomists everywhere crying themselves to sleep are the following, particularly egregious missteps:

to:

* ''Film/GodzillaKingOfTheMonsters'': Titans are all classified under the genus ''Titanus''. Titans represent everything from Godzilla (a reptile) to King Kong (a mammal) to Mothra (an insect). While this is already bad enough, what tips this into making taxonomists everywhere crying cry themselves to sleep are the following, particularly egregious missteps:

Added: 359

Changed: 254

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/GodzillaKingOfTheMonsters'': Titans are all classified under the genus ''Titanus''. Besides the fact that this name is already used for a beetle (and hence cannot be reused), Titans represent everything from Godzilla (a reptile) to King Kong (a mammal) to Mothra (an insect).

to:

* ''Film/GodzillaKingOfTheMonsters'': Titans are all classified under the genus ''Titanus''. Besides the fact that this name is already used for a beetle (and hence cannot be reused), Titans represent everything from Godzilla (a reptile) to King Kong (a mammal) to Mothra (an insect).insect). While this is already bad enough, what tips this into making taxonomists everywhere crying themselves to sleep are the following, particularly egregious missteps:
** As a genus name, ''Titanus'' couldn't be used to represent the Titans, as there is already an organism which uses the name, the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_beetle Titan beetle]] (''Titanus giganteus'').
** Assuming the different Titans do belong to different phyla and classes in the animal kingdom, they would not be able to share the same genus.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Literature/InCryptid'' includes a [[AllThereInTheManual field guide]] to many cryptid species on the author's website, but sometimes bends the rules of taxonomy (rather JustForFun{{egregious}}ly, since Creator/SeananMcGuire was a herpetologist before becoming a novelist).

to:

* ''Literature/InCryptid'' includes a [[AllThereInTheManual field guide]] to many cryptid species on the author's website, but sometimes bends the rules of taxonomy (rather JustForFun{{egregious}}ly, JustForFun/{{egregious}}ly, since Creator/SeananMcGuire was a herpetologist before becoming a novelist).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/InCryptid'' includes a [[AllThereInTheManual field guide]] to many cryptid species on the author's website, but sometimes bends the rules of taxonomy (rather JustForFun{{egregious}}ly, since Creator/SeananMcGuire was a herpetologist before becoming a novelist).
** The entry on [[https://seananmcguire.com/fglindworm.php Lindworms]] calls them "a member of the largest surviving subfamily of non-saurian giant reptiles". While the skink family is indeed the most diverse family of lizards, "saurian" can refer to "all extant reptiles (and their extinct relatives) except turtles" or simply "''lizards''" (that's what it means in Greek). While she may have been using "saurian" to mean ''dino''saurian, most lizards would not be considered "giant reptiles".
** Many entries have a "family" name that does not end in the customary "-idae" suffix (though in most cases these were made up InUniverse by cryptozoologists without the knowledge or approval of the ICZN).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Oops.


** The animals are collectively referred to as "dinosaurs". While this makes sense in the base game, the ''Sea Monsters'' DLC includes nothosaurs, plesiosaurs, ichthyosaurs, crocodilians, turtle, and ''fish''.

to:

** The animals are collectively referred to as "dinosaurs". While this makes sense in the base game, the ''Sea Monsters'' DLC includes nothosaurs, plesiosaurs, ichthyosaurs, crocodilians, turtle, turtles, and ''fish''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The animals are collectively referred to as "dinosaurs". While this made sense for the base game, the ''Sea Monsters'' DLC includes nothosaurs, plesiosaurs, ichthyosaurs, crocodilians, and ''fish''.

to:

** The animals are collectively referred to as "dinosaurs". While this made makes sense for in the base game, the ''Sea Monsters'' DLC includes nothosaurs, plesiosaurs, ichthyosaurs, crocodilians, turtle, and ''fish''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
cut trope


** The show treats "plankton" as if it were a species the character named Plankton belong to. The term "plankton" is not actually taxonomic at all, it refers to any oceanic organism that floats but cannot swim against the current. Given the show often [[ShownTheirWork shows its work]] about marine biology, and that Plankton [[https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-82792771.html is actually]] a copepod ([[SeldomSeenSpecies a rather obscure species]]), this was probably done for simplicity's sake.

to:

** The show treats "plankton" as if it were a species the character named Plankton belong to. The term "plankton" is not actually taxonomic at all, it refers to any oceanic organism that floats but cannot swim against the current. Given the show often [[ShownTheirWork shows its work]] about marine biology, and that Plankton [[https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-82792771.html is actually]] a copepod ([[SeldomSeenSpecies a rather obscure species]]), copepod, this was probably done for simplicity's sake.

Added: 408

Changed: 263

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''VideoGame/{{Parkasaurus}}'', the seven major groups of dinosaurs are called "families". The ''Sea Monsters'' DLC adds two more "families" -- aquatic and semi-aquatic -- which are more like broad descriptions. Also, all the animals are called "dinos", which none of the sea monsters are.

to:

* In ''VideoGame/{{Parkasaurus}}'', the ''VideoGame/{{Parkasaurus}}'':
** The
seven major groups of dinosaurs are called "families". "families", even though they're not. The ''Sea Monsters'' DLC adds two more "families" -- aquatic and semi-aquatic -- which are more like broad descriptions. Also, all the descriptions.
** The
animals are called "dinos", which none of collectively referred to as "dinosaurs". While this made sense for the sea monsters are.base game, the ''Sea Monsters'' DLC includes nothosaurs, plesiosaurs, ichthyosaurs, crocodilians, and ''fish''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''VideoGame/{{Parkasaurus}}'', the seven major groups of dinosaurs are called "families". The ''Sea Monsters'' DLC adds two more "families" -- aquatic and semi-aquatic -- which are more like broad descriptions. Also, all the animals are called "dinos", which none of the sea monsters are.

Added: 638

Changed: 482

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WesternAnimation/SpongebobSquarepants'' treats "plankton" as if it were a species the character named Plankton belong to. The term "plankton" is not actually taxonomic at all, it refers to any oceanic organism that floats but cannot swim against the current. Given the show often [[ShownTheirWork shows its work]] about marine biology, and that Plankton [[https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-82792771.html is actually]] a copepod ([[SeldomSeenSpecies a rather obscure species]]), this was probably done for simplicity's sake.

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/SpongebobSquarepants'' ''WesternAnimation/SpongebobSquarepants'':
** The show
treats "plankton" as if it were a species the character named Plankton belong to. The term "plankton" is not actually taxonomic at all, it refers to any oceanic organism that floats but cannot swim against the current. Given the show often [[ShownTheirWork shows its work]] about marine biology, and that Plankton [[https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-82792771.html is actually]] a copepod ([[SeldomSeenSpecies a rather obscure species]]), this was probably done for simplicity's sake.sake.
** Plankton has also been known to refer to himself as a "protozoan" or "single-cell", neither of which are descriptions that apply to copepods.

Added: 327

Changed: 40

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Comic Strips]]
* An InUniverse example occurs in one ''ComicStrip/CalvinAndHobbes'' storyline, where Calvin is writing a report on bats, which he claims are bugs. Everyone points out that he's wrong, but he refuses to listen.
-->'''Calvin (angrily):''' Who's giving the report, ''you'' chowderheads or ''me''?
[[/folder]]



* ''Series/DoctorWho'' has a species of reptilian humanoids, the Silurians, that are referred to sometimes as ''Homo reptilia''. The ''Homo'' genus is mammalian. Furthermore, reptiles hadn't even evolved by the Silurian era, making that part of the name rather baffling as well. (The Doctor once suggested that they should have been called "Eocenes" after another geological period they didn't come from.)

to:

* ''Series/DoctorWho'' has a species of reptilian humanoids, the Silurians, that are referred to sometimes as ''Homo reptilia''. The ''Homo'' genus is mammalian. Furthermore, reptiles (or any tetrapod, for that matter) hadn't even evolved by the Silurian era, period, making that part of the name rather baffling as well. (The Doctor once suggested that they should have been called "Eocenes" after another geological period they didn't come from.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/KongSkullIsland'': Supplementary material released for the film claims that the Leafwings, a species of seemingly reptilian flyers, are a 'subspecies' of the Psychovulture, a monster with considerably different physiology. This would be a stretch, but still possible, but what really throws the taxonomy out the window is the way they're classified, and improperly capitalised, to boot! The Leafwings are ''Icarus Folium'' (which also clashed with the binomial name chosen for the also-existing Spirit Tiger at the time, ''Icarus Tigris''), while the Psychovultures are ''Vultura Insanus''. Not only would this not make the Leafwing a subspecies of the Psychovulture, but under this arrangement, it would belong to an entirely different genus and species.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''WesternAnimation/{{Zootopia}}'': At a few points, characters refer to the "predator family". Even going by the in-universe definition of "predator" (that is, a sapient mammal species that eats other sapient mammals), that's still wildly biologically inaccurate (one could say that they were thinking of Carnivora, but that's an ''order'', it contains several types of animals that don't eat mammals (and some don't even normally eat animals, period), and there are mammals outside of Carnivora that eat other mammals).

to:

** ''WesternAnimation/{{Zootopia}}'': At a few points, characters refer to the "predator family". Even going by the in-universe definition of "predator" (that is, a sapient mammal species that eats used to eat other sapient mammals), that's still wildly biologically inaccurate (one could say that they were thinking of Carnivora, but that's an ''order'', it contains several types of animals that don't eat mammals (and some don't even normally eat animals, period), and there are mammals outside of Carnivora that eat other mammals).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Card Games]]
* The Ed-U-Cards game "Animal Bird or Fish" correctly includes a seahorse in the "fish" category--but also includes a dolphin (mammal) and a frog (amphibian).
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
article erroneously stated the phylum goes below class in zoology. this is not true.


* Phylum (division in botany; the division goes directly beneath the class in zoology)

to:

* Phylum (division in botany; the division goes directly beneath the class in zoology)Phylum
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/KillBill'': Only three of the members of the Deadly Viper Assassination Squad are actually named for vipers.

to:

* ''Film/KillBill'': Only three of the Not all members of the Deadly Viper Assassination Squad are actually named for vipers.vipers. Cottonmouth (O-Ren), Copperhead (Vernita), and Sidewinder (Budd) are vipers, but Black Mamba (the Bride herself) and California Mountain Snake (Elle) aren't.



* ''Literature/{{Spellsinger}}'' refers to shrews as "rodents".

to:

* ''Literature/{{Spellsinger}}'' refers to shrews (order Eulipotyphla) as "rodents"."rodents" (order Rodentia).



* ''Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog'' is often erroneously referred to as a rodent. Hedgehogs actually belong to the order Eulipotyphia, which indeed contains several ''other'' animals frequently mistaken for rodents (namely moles and shrews). Similarly to the ''WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy'' example (below in the Western Animation folder), hedgehogs and rodents are boreoeutherian mammals, and that's where they diverge: Eulipotyphia is in superorder Laurasiatheria (which contains animals like ungulates and bats), while Rodentia is in superorder Euarchontoglires (which contains animals like rabbits and primates).

to:

* ''Franchise/SonicTheHedgehog'' is often erroneously referred to as a rodent. Hedgehogs actually belong to the order Eulipotyphia, Eulipotyphla, which indeed contains several ''other'' animals frequently mistaken for rodents (namely moles and shrews). Similarly to the ''WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy'' example (below in the Western Animation folder), hedgehogs and rodents are boreoeutherian mammals, and that's where they diverge: Eulipotyphia Eulipotyphla is in superorder Laurasiatheria (which contains animals like ungulates and bats), while Rodentia is in superorder Euarchontoglires (which contains animals like rabbits and primates).

Added: 742

Changed: 4

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Literature/{{Childcraft}}: ''About Animals'' identifies arthropods as a "class" of animals, when it really is a phylum. It could be argued that ''phylum'' is too advanced a word for a book aimed at 6-year-olds, but that could also be argued of ''arthropod'', and that didn't stop the publishers. (Probably they figured that anything was better than risking spiders getting classed as "insects".) Even more JustForFun/{{egregious}} as there are more arthropods in existence than every other phylum of animals combined.

to:

* Literature/{{Childcraft}}: ''Literature/{{Childcraft}}'': ''About Animals'' identifies arthropods as a "class" of animals, when it really is a phylum. It could be argued that ''phylum'' is too advanced a word for a book aimed at 6-year-olds, but that could also be argued of ''arthropod'', and that didn't stop the publishers. (Probably they figured that anything was better than risking spiders getting classed as "insects".) Even more JustForFun/{{egregious}} as there are more arthropods in existence than every other phylum of animals combined.


Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/{{Dracopedia}}'': The books don't use taxonomic terms precisely as they are meant to be used. Primarily, binomial names are used for both individual species and individual genuses -- in essence, each dragon family is referred to as ''Draco [genus name]'', and each individual species within it is then ''[genus name] [species name]''. For instance, great dragons as a whole are referred to as ''Draco dracorexus'', while the Welsh red, a specific species of great dragon, is ''Dracorexus idraigoxus''. This isn't how binomials work -- only genus, species and subspecies names are included in a species' formal taxonomic name, and anything above that would just be referred to as "[genus species], in family x, in order y", etc.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* During a humorous argument between a Blastoise and a Charizard in [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-sOkQMKn2c ''Poke Buds: Ep 1 Blastoise and Charizard FIGHT!'']] the later makes the claim that he is awesome because he is a dragon, which Blastoise refutes for being circular reasoning before pointing out that Charizard isn't a dragon at all, which leads to the following quote posted above for the page.

Added: 166

Changed: 158

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "[[Recap/PhineasAndFerbTheReturnOfTheRogueRabbit The Return of the Rogue Rabbit]]": Subverted and also done in-universe when characters would object to [[ShownTheirWork rabbits being called rodents and correct that they are early episode "Toy to the World" had a platypus referred to as a marsupial. Later episodes corrected this and have platypodes properly identified as monotremes.

to:

** "[[Recap/PhineasAndFerbTheReturnOfTheRogueRabbit The Return of the Rogue Rabbit]]": Subverted and also done in-universe when characters would object to [[ShownTheirWork rabbits being called rodents and correct that they are lagomorphs]].
** An
early episode "Toy to the World" had a platypus referred to as a marsupial. Later episodes corrected this and have platypodes properly identified as monotremes.

Top