Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / CharacterPerceptionEvolution

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Manga/OnePiece'': Hody Jones was originally seen as a [[ReplacementScrappy flat replacement]] of Arlong, lacking the traits that made him a memorable antagonist. Overtime, fans have come to see him as a [[RealismInducedHorror shockingly realistic]] portrayal of how racists can be made from being born in an environment that encourages those viewpoints with nothing to oppose them. Furthermore, fans have also since come to properly realize and understand that his earlier lack of memorability compared to Arlong could be considered an intentional showing of how villains like him are essentially 'old news' to the Straw Hats as they are post timeskip and how they now have much bigger threats to seriously worry about now that they've TookALevelInBadass to prepare for the New World.

to:

* ''Manga/OnePiece'': Hody Jones was originally seen as a [[ReplacementScrappy flat replacement]] of Arlong, lacking the traits that made him a memorable antagonist. Overtime, Over time, however, fans have come to see him as a [[RealismInducedHorror shockingly realistic]] portrayal of how racists can be made from being born in an environment that encourages those viewpoints with nothing to oppose them. Furthermore, fans have also since come to properly realize and understand that his earlier lack of memorability compared to Arlong could be considered an intentional showing of how villains like him are essentially 'old news' to the Straw Hats as they are post timeskip post-time skip and how they now have much bigger threats to seriously worry about now that they've TookALevelInBadass to prepare for the New World.World. This idea is further helped by how Arlong's own backstory revealed that he was a NormalFishInATinyPond (no pun intended).



* ''Literature/{{Dracula}}'': Jonathan Harker had long been derided as boring and chauvinistic. As a result, he has not fared well in adaptations or [[Literature/DraculaTheUnDead2009 the official sequel]] of the book, usually presented as the repressive and/or dull alternative to the mysterious, seductive Count {{Dracula}}. However, when Dracula Daily kicked off and readers went back to the original source material, Website/{{Tumblr}} users quickly embraced Jonathan as [[PlayAlongMeme their new best friend]], connecting with his open adoration of his wife, his willingness to condemn himself to a FateWorseThanDeath [[YouAreWorthHell if it means Mina won't be alone]], and his struggles to survive an extremely traumatic situation as the Count's prisoner, qualities which had been overlooked for quite some time and rarely, if ever, shown in adaptations.

to:

* ''Literature/{{Dracula}}'': Jonathan Harker had long been derided as boring and chauvinistic. As a result, he has not fared well in adaptations or [[Literature/DraculaTheUnDead2009 the official sequel]] of the book, usually presented as the repressive and/or dull alternative to the mysterious, seductive Count {{Dracula}}. {{Dracula}}, with ones produced after the sexual revolution and the rise of second-wave feminism tending to be particularly unkind to him. However, when Dracula Daily kicked off and readers went back to the original source material, Website/{{Tumblr}} users quickly embraced Jonathan as [[PlayAlongMeme their new best friend]], connecting with his open adoration of his wife, his willingness to condemn himself to a FateWorseThanDeath [[YouAreWorthHell if it means Mina won't be alone]], and his struggles to survive an extremely traumatic situation as the Count's prisoner, qualities which had been overlooked for quite some time and rarely, if ever, shown in adaptations.
adaptations. This has led many to champion him as a far more compelling and sympathetic character than previously considered.



** Severus Snape went through this twice. Initially seen as an unlikable {{Jerkass}} with an arbitrary hatred of Harry (albeit one with a very large DracoInLeatherPants following), later books revealed that he was bullied by Harry's father and fell in love with Harry's mother, which recontextualized his treatment of Harry. Together with his role as TheMole for Dumbledore, this shifted fan perception of Snape into a TragicHero and a JerkWithAHeartOfGold, aided by his AdaptationalSympathy (not to mention Creator/AlanRickman's charismatic performance) in the films. However, with the passage of time and [[ValuesDissonance changing social mores]], his SadistTeacher behavior saw renewed criticism and his treatment of Harry's mother was increasingly seen as unhealthily obsessive in light of incel culture and its rampant misogyny becoming more prominent in the 2010s. These observations have shifted fan opinion of the book version of Snape to a DoggedNiceGuy and a StalkerWithACrush that [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic the narrative fails to make sympathetic]]. [[AdaptationalNiceGuy The movie version]] gets more of a pass, again in large part because of Alan Rickman's performance.

to:

** Severus Snape went through this twice. Initially seen as an unlikable {{Jerkass}} with an arbitrary hatred of Harry (albeit one with a very large DracoInLeatherPants following), later books revealed that he was bullied by Harry's father and fell in love with Harry's mother, which recontextualized his treatment of Harry. Together with his role as TheMole for Dumbledore, this shifted fan perception of Snape into a TragicHero and a JerkWithAHeartOfGold, aided by his AdaptationalSympathy (not to mention Creator/AlanRickman's charismatic performance) in the films. However, with the passage of time and [[ValuesDissonance changing social mores]], his SadistTeacher behavior saw renewed criticism and his treatment of Harry's mother was increasingly seen as unhealthily obsessive in light of incel culture and its rampant misogyny becoming more prominent in the 2010s. These observations have shifted fan opinion of the book version of Snape to a DoggedNiceGuy and a StalkerWithACrush that [[UnintentionallyUnsympathetic the narrative fails to make sympathetic]]. [[AdaptationalNiceGuy The movie version]] gets more of a pass, again in large part because of certain writing changes and Alan Rickman's performance.



** When the book was first released, Captain Ahab was derided by critics as an unrealistic character, with many of them scoffing at the idea that he could go as far as he did and simply be obeyed. Following UsefulNotes/WorldWarI, however, Ahab's destructive obsession and his crew going along with it resonated far more strongly. It's telling that today, multiple real people seen as letting their obsessions get the better of them with disastrous consequences have been compared to Ahab.

to:

** When the book was first released, Captain Ahab was widely derided by critics as an unrealistic character, with many of them scoffing at the idea that he could go as far as he did and simply be obeyed. Following UsefulNotes/WorldWarI, however, Ahab's destructive obsession and his crew going along with it resonated far more strongly. It's telling that today, multiple real people seen as letting their obsessions get the better of them with disastrous consequences have been compared to Ahab.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/StarshipTroopers'': The portrayal of the United Citizen Federation was initially seen by many detractors of the film to be an outright glorification of militaristic fascism, with some even going as far as to accuse director Paul Verhoeven and Edward Neumeier of outright pro-Nazi sympathies. In reality, the film was satirizing the militarism and perceived crypto-fascist tendencies within Robert Heinlein's [[Literature/StarshipTroopers original novel]], which was unapparent to many reviewers. In recent years, with greater appreciation of the satire of the movie and the perception that multiple media sources have been drawing in far-right audiences and fanbases often "missing the point" of what said media sources are critiquing, the portrayal of the United Citizen Federation has ended up being increasingly seen as one of the most effective pieces of anti-fascist satire in cinematic history.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''ComicBook/TheLeagueOfExtraordinaryGentlemen'': Moore's take on Mina Murray, heroine of ''Literature/{{Dracula}}'', was a beloved aspect of the book for years. Moore's take on Mina as an early suffragette who was also the sensible anchor of the League with nothing but social competence and wit, along with merely the idea of pushing Mina to a central role rather than the book's male figures like Dracula, Jonathan, or van Helsing, earned her a lot of praise as a feminist, TruerToTheText reinvention of the character in the face of most adaptations [[AdaptationalWimp turning her into nothing more than Dracula's victim]]. However, over time, the critical luster surrounding ''League'' started to fade due to its divisive later installments, and Mina maintained a continual presence up to the end in all of them, meaning her character ended up suffering the most in the process, becoming a PinballProtagonist with little to none of her original identity. Then, people began revisiting the original book and found that Moore's take on Mina was anything but TruerToTheText, with the main concept of her character--that she divorced her husband because he found her neck scars ugly, and would go on to become an immortal asskicker--defying [[HappilyMarried everything about the two]] and [[WhoWantsToLiveForever Mina's beliefs]] that Stoker had presented. From then on, many other traits of Mina fell under scrutiny: [[FauxActionGirl her leadership being more often than not wholly ineffective]], her regular role as a DamselInDistress, and the heavy implication that she lusted for Dracula after his attack on her, which was also suggested to be part of her attraction to Quatermain, all of which seriously dented the idea of her as a feminist character. Lastly, it became more widely-known that according to Moore, he only picked Mina [[TheSmurfettePrinciple because he needed a woman]], and he originally wrote and envisioned her as [[Literature/SherlockHolmes Irene Adler]], only ditching Adler because he couldn't remember her name. Nowadays, it's far more common to find people invoking Moore's Mina as an example of what ''not'' to do with the character.

to:

* ''ComicBook/TheLeagueOfExtraordinaryGentlemen'': Moore's take on Mina Murray, heroine of ''Literature/{{Dracula}}'', was a beloved aspect of the book for years. Moore's take on Mina as an early suffragette who was also the sensible anchor of the League with nothing but social competence and wit, along with merely the idea of pushing Mina to a central role rather than the book's male figures like Dracula, Jonathan, or van Helsing, earned her a lot of praise as a feminist, TruerToTheText reinvention of the character in the face of most adaptations [[AdaptationalWimp turning her into nothing more than Dracula's victim]]. However, over time, the critical luster surrounding ''League'' started to fade due to its divisive later installments, and Mina maintained a continual presence up to the end in all most of them, meaning her character ended up suffering the most in the process, becoming a PinballProtagonist with little to none of her original identity. Then, people began revisiting the original book and found that Moore's take on Mina was anything but TruerToTheText, with the main concept of her character--that she divorced her husband because he found her neck scars ugly, and would go on to become an immortal asskicker--defying [[HappilyMarried everything about the two]] and [[WhoWantsToLiveForever Mina's beliefs]] that Stoker had presented. From then on, many other traits of Mina fell under scrutiny: [[FauxActionGirl her leadership being more often than not wholly ineffective]], her regular role as a DamselInDistress, and the heavy implication that she lusted for Dracula after his attack on her, which was also suggested to be part of her attraction to Quatermain, all of which seriously dented the idea of her as a feminist character. Lastly, it became more widely-known that according to Moore, he only picked Mina [[TheSmurfettePrinciple because he needed a woman]], and he originally wrote and envisioned her as [[Literature/SherlockHolmes Irene Adler]], only ditching Adler because he couldn't remember her name. Nowadays, it's far more common to find people invoking Moore's Mina as an example of what ''not'' to do with the character.

Top