Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Heartwarming / MisterPlinkettReviews

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Plinkett:''' He's not a bad actor, kids; leave him alone.

to:

-->'''Plinkett:''' He's not a bad actor, kids; leave him alone. Even Sir Creator/LaurenceOlivier couldn't read these shitty lines!

Added: 1190

Changed: 6164

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
adapted to wikivoice


* How is it possible that a 119 year old serial killer manages to make the ends of all of his ''Star Wars'' prequel reviews heartwarming? Because Plinkett comes across shockingly as a humanist, pleading for films that aren't cold, technological, cynical grabs at money, but films that embrace characters, emotions and story.
-->'''Plinkett:''' So, I don't know if there's anything to say about ''Film/RevengeOfTheSith'' or the other ''Star Wars'' prequels. Sure, you can pick them apart on the technical failures, the plot inconsistencies, the lousy dialog, but generally speaking, they failed to connect with people, and that was the main problem. It felt like someone came along and sucked all the excitement and emotion out of Star Wars, and they left it in this vacuum of dull, sterile boringness. The original films had a richness to them. They felt more real. There is just so many moments and images that resonate all our collective memories. There's just too many to list. Moments we remember because we're emotionally invested in what's happening.
** Plinkett telling people to leave Creator/HaydenChristensen alone, stating that the guy worked as best as he could with what he was given.
* He was one of the few critics who liked both Mutt Williams and Creator/ShiaLaBeouf in ''Film/IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull'', praising him as a natural actor.
* Plinkett defends Creator/LeslieJones in his ''Film/Ghostbusters2016'' review, saying her role as Patty was closest to the spirit of the original movie, had the most believable reactions to what was going on around her, and didn't wear a smirk during the entire film. In general, he makes a point of noting that all four actresses playing the new Ghostbusters are talented and funny comedians who were simply miscast.
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames him for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of it was to be pinned on Sony for choosing the wrong director, and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for his cast and crew. Given how controversial Feig is, it's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice]], [[RunningTheAsylum in fact]]."
* Something similar to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple of moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and jovial guy who was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him as an artist for attempting that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty much every level in the task he set out to do.
* Mike's love for ''Franchise/StarTrek'' comes through while Plinkett fires off at ''Series/StarTrekPicard'' for being unnecessarily mean-spirited and cynical compared to the rest of the series, and Plinkett's final speech about the optimism of old ''Star Trek'' is accompanied by a montage of all the previous series' (except ''Discovery'') captains being role models and leading their crews. He tells the audience that he doesn't want to be a gatekeeper and invites viewers to watch the older series (except ''Discovery'') to see what ''Star Trek'' is supposed to be.
** The same review opens by having Plinkett toss out a bunch of potential ideas for a show that could involve a retired Picard while staying in tone with ''Next Generation''. He then rattles off episodic plot after plot of languid low-stakes adventures, featuring all kinds of character moments, cute setpieces, callouts to the classic series, and a likeable cast enjoying the fruits of a prosperous future. There's only maybe one or two off-color jokes, and to cap it off, they even have rather pretty-looking storyboards which showcase the ideas on display. It expresses a sincerity that's very uncommon in a series that positively runs on caustic postmodernism and irony, and makes it clear that he genuinely loves the franchise.

to:

* How is it possible that a 119 year old serial killer who doesn't hold back on his criticism manages to make the ends of all of his ''Star Wars'' prequel reviews heartwarming? have ''several'' entries on a page like this? Because Plinkett comes across shockingly as a humanist, pleading he can be surprisingly ''fair'' in his criticism, and won't hesitate to criticize other people for films misidentifying what went wrong with a given movie.
* His review of ''Film/RevengeOfTheSith'' shows a humanistic side in his desire for a film
that aren't isn't a cold, technological, sterile, cynical grabs at money, money-grab, but films rather one that embrace embraces the characters, emotions emotions, and story.
story -- like the original trilogy.
-->'''Plinkett:''' So, I don't know if there's anything to say about ''Film/RevengeOfTheSith'' ''Revenge of the Sith'' or the other ''Star Wars'' prequels. Sure, you can pick them apart on the technical failures, the plot inconsistencies, and the lousy dialog, but dialogue. But generally speaking, they failed to connect with people, and that was the main problem. It felt like someone came along and sucked all the excitement and emotion out of Star Wars, ''Star Wars'', and they then left it in this vacuum of dull, sterile boringness. The original films had a richness to them. They felt more real. There is are just so many moments and images that resonate in all our collective memories. There's just too many to list. Moments we remember because we're emotionally invested in what's happening.
** Plinkett telling people
happening.
* He makes it a point
to leave say that Creator/HaydenChristensen alone, stating that is not to blame for how his character turned out and did the guy worked as best as he could with what he was given.
-->'''Plinkett:''' He's not a bad actor, kids; leave him alone.
* He was one of the few critics who liked both Creator/ShiaLaBeouf's turn as Mutt Williams and Creator/ShiaLaBeouf in ''Film/IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull'', praising him as a natural actor.
* Plinkett defends Creator/LeslieJones in
actor and his character as providing an interesting dimension to the film.
* He made it a point to defend the cast of
''Film/Ghostbusters2016'' review, saying -- in the face of the greater Internet putting the blame squarely on their shoulders. He says they're all genuine comedic talents who just had nothing to work with and couldn't have saved the movie no matter what they did. He singled out Creator/LeslieJones as playing her role as Patty was the closest to the spirit of the original movie, saying she had the most believable reactions to what was going on around her, her and didn't wear a smirk during the entire film. In general, he makes a point film.
* He's pretty uncompromising in his criticism
of noting that all four actresses playing the new Ghostbusters are talented and funny comedians who were simply miscast.
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with
''Ghostbusters'' director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames Creator/PaulFeig, but he does defend him in two key respects; first, that while he was the wrong fit for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of movie it was to be pinned on Sony Sony's fault for choosing the wrong director, him; and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for second, that Feig was no PrimaDonnaDirector but rather an ExtremeDoormat -- he loved his cast and crew. Given how controversial Feig is, it's crew so much that he [[RunningTheAsylum wouldn't tell them no to anything]]. It's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying say that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice]], [[RunningTheAsylum guy -- too nice, in fact]].fact."
* Something similar to He does the above happens in the same for Creator/RianJohnson, director of ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes taking a couple of moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports his genuine passion and in excitement for the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice film, his respect for the cast and jovial guy who was certainly very passionate crew, and serious about making his earnest desire and hard work in giving a fresh new spin on ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted Wars''. Regardless of the outcome, which Plinkett didn't like at all, Plinkett goes out of his way to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him to Johnson as an artist just for attempting that. But his drive.
* In spite of his curmudgeonly demeanor,
he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty much every level in the task he set out to do.
* Mike's
betrays a deep-seated love and respect for ''Franchise/StarTrek'' comes through while Plinkett fires off at (the same as his portrayer Mike Stoklasa). When criticizing ''Series/StarTrekPicard'' for being unnecessarily mean-spirited and cynical compared to tonally inconsistent with the rest of the series, franchise, he does it from a position of knowing what ''Star Trek'' is supposed to be. He spends a lot of time in his review rattling off potential episodic plots for the series with a lot of detail, lovingly crafted storyboards depicting them, and Plinkett's a relative dearth of his usual off-color humor, displaying a genuine desire to improve the final product. And he gives a final speech about the optimism of old ''Star Trek'' is Trek'', accompanied by a montage of the captains of all the previous series' prior series (except ''Discovery'') captains being role models and [[AFatherToHisMen leading their crews. He tells crews]]. And he admits to the audience that he doesn't want to be a gatekeeper and invites viewers them to watch the older series (except ''Star Trek'' shows (again, except ''Discovery'') to see what ''Star Trek'' is supposed was meant to be.
** The same review opens by having Plinkett toss out a bunch of potential ideas for a show that could involve a retired Picard while staying in tone with ''Next Generation''. He then rattles off episodic plot after plot of languid low-stakes adventures, featuring all kinds of character moments, cute setpieces, callouts to the classic series, and a likeable cast enjoying the fruits of a prosperous future. There's only maybe one or two off-color jokes, and to cap it off, they even have rather pretty-looking storyboards which showcase the ideas on display.
be. It expresses a sincerity that's very uncommon in a series that positively runs on caustic postmodernism and irony, and makes it clear that he genuinely loves the franchise.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple of moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and jovial guy who was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him as an artist for attempting that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty much every level in the task he set out to do.

to:

* Something simlair similar to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple of moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and jovial guy who was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him as an artist for attempting that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty much every level in the task he set out to do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple of moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and jovial guy who was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty much every level in the task he set out to do.

to:

* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple of moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and jovial guy who was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him as an artist for attempting that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty much every level in the task he set out to do.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple of moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and jovial guy who was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty every level in the task he set out to do.

to:

* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple of moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and jovial guy who was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty much every level in the task he set out to do.

Added: 418

Changed: 494

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Plinkett defends [[Series/SaturdayNightLive Leslie Jones]] in his ''Film/Ghostbusters2016'' review, saying her role as Patty was closest to the spirit of the original movie, had the most believable reactions to what was going on around her, and didn't wear a smirk during the entire film. In general, he makes a point of noting that all four actresses playing the new Ghostbusters are talented and funny comedians who were simply miscast.

to:

* He was one of the few critics who liked both Mutt Williams and Creator/ShiaLaBeouf in ''Film/IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull'', praising him as a natural actor.
* Plinkett defends [[Series/SaturdayNightLive Leslie Jones]] Creator/LeslieJones in his ''Film/Ghostbusters2016'' review, saying her role as Patty was closest to the spirit of the original movie, had the most believable reactions to what was going on around her, and didn't wear a smirk during the entire film. In general, he makes a point of noting that all four actresses playing the new Ghostbusters are talented and funny comedians who were simply miscast.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Mike's love for ''Franchise/StarTrek'' comes through while Plinkett fires off at ''Series/StarTrekPicard'' for being unnecessarily mean-spirited and cynical compared to the rest of the series, and Plinkett's final speech about the optimism of old ''Star Trek'' is accompanied by a montage of all the previous series' (except ''Discovery'') captains being role models and leading their crews. He seems to have trouble keeping up the Plinkett voice as it grows quieter by the end of the review.

to:

* Mike's love for ''Franchise/StarTrek'' comes through while Plinkett fires off at ''Series/StarTrekPicard'' for being unnecessarily mean-spirited and cynical compared to the rest of the series, and Plinkett's final speech about the optimism of old ''Star Trek'' is accompanied by a montage of all the previous series' (except ''Discovery'') captains being role models and leading their crews. He seems to have trouble keeping up tells the Plinkett voice as it grows quieter by audience that he doesn't want to be a gatekeeper and invites viewers to watch the end of the review. older series (except ''Discovery'') to see what ''Star Trek'' is supposed to be.

Changed: 12

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The same review opens by having Plinkett toss out a bunch of potential ideas for a show that could involve a retired Picard while staying in tone with ''Next Generation''. He then rattles off episodic plot after plot of languid low-stakes adventures, featuring all kinds of character moments, cute setpieces, callouts to the classic series, and a likeable cast enjoying the fruits of a prosperous future. There's only maybe one or two off-color jokes, and to cap it off, they even have rather pretty-looking storyboards which showcase the idea. It expresses a sincerity that's very uncommon in a series that positively runs on caustic postmodernism and irony, and makes it clear that he genuinely loves the franchise.

to:

** The same review opens by having Plinkett toss out a bunch of potential ideas for a show that could involve a retired Picard while staying in tone with ''Next Generation''. He then rattles off episodic plot after plot of languid low-stakes adventures, featuring all kinds of character moments, cute setpieces, callouts to the classic series, and a likeable cast enjoying the fruits of a prosperous future. There's only maybe one or two off-color jokes, and to cap it off, they even have rather pretty-looking storyboards which showcase the idea.ideas on display. It expresses a sincerity that's very uncommon in a series that positively runs on caustic postmodernism and irony, and makes it clear that he genuinely loves the franchise.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The same review opens by having Plinkett toss out a bunch of potential ideas for a show that could involve a retired Picard while staying in tone with ''Next Generation''. He then rattles off episodic plot after plot of languid low-stakes adventures, featuring all kinds of character moments, cute setpieces, callouts to the classic series, and a likeable cast enjoying the fruits of a prosperous future. There's only maybe one or two off-color jokes, and to cap it off, they even have rather pretty-looking storyboards which showcase the idea. It expresses a sincerity that's very uncommon in a series that positively runs on caustic postmodernism and irony, and makes it clear that he genuinely loves the franchise.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Mike's love for ''Franchise/StarTrek'' comes through while Plinkett fires off at ''Series/StarTrekPicard'' for being unnecessarily mean-spirited and cynical compared to the rest of the series, and Plinkett's final speech about the optimism of old Star Trek is accompanied by a montage of all the previous series' (except ''Discovery'') captains leading their crews. He seems to have trouble keeping up the Plinkett voice as it grows quieter by the end of the review.

to:

* Mike's love for ''Franchise/StarTrek'' comes through while Plinkett fires off at ''Series/StarTrekPicard'' for being unnecessarily mean-spirited and cynical compared to the rest of the series, and Plinkett's final speech about the optimism of old Star Trek ''Star Trek'' is accompanied by a montage of all the previous series' (except ''Discovery'') captains being role models and leading their crews. He seems to have trouble keeping up the Plinkett voice as it grows quieter by the end of the review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Mike's love for ''Franchise/StarTrek'' comes through while Plinkett fires off at ''Series/StarTrekPicard'' for being unnecessarily mean-spirited compared to the rest of the series, and Plinkett's final speech about the optimism of old Star Trek is accompanied by a montage of all the previous series' (except Discovery) captains leading their crews. He seems to have trouble keeping up the Plinkett voice as it grows quieter by the end of the review.

to:

* Mike's love for ''Franchise/StarTrek'' comes through while Plinkett fires off at ''Series/StarTrekPicard'' for being unnecessarily mean-spirited and cynical compared to the rest of the series, and Plinkett's final speech about the optimism of old Star Trek is accompanied by a montage of all the previous series' (except Discovery) ''Discovery'') captains leading their crews. He seems to have trouble keeping up the Plinkett voice as it grows quieter by the end of the review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Mike's love for ''Franchise/StarTrek'' comes through while Plinkett fires off at ''Series/StarTrekPicard'' for being unnecessarily mean-spirited compared to the rest of the series, and Plinkett's final speech about the optimism of old Star Trek is accompanied by a montage of all the previous series' (except Discovery) captains leading their crews. He seems to have trouble keeping up the Plinkett voice as it grows quieter by the end of the review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving stuff from main page.

Added DiffLines:

* How is it possible that a 119 year old serial killer manages to make the ends of all of his ''Star Wars'' prequel reviews heartwarming? Because Plinkett comes across shockingly as a humanist, pleading for films that aren't cold, technological, cynical grabs at money, but films that embrace characters, emotions and story.
-->'''Plinkett:''' So, I don't know if there's anything to say about ''Film/RevengeOfTheSith'' or the other ''Star Wars'' prequels. Sure, you can pick them apart on the technical failures, the plot inconsistencies, the lousy dialog, but generally speaking, they failed to connect with people, and that was the main problem. It felt like someone came along and sucked all the excitement and emotion out of Star Wars, and they left it in this vacuum of dull, sterile boringness. The original films had a richness to them. They felt more real. There is just so many moments and images that resonate all our collective memories. There's just too many to list. Moments we remember because we're emotionally invested in what's happening.
** Plinkett telling people to leave Creator/HaydenChristensen alone, stating that the guy worked as best as he could with what he was given.
* Plinkett defends [[Series/SaturdayNightLive Leslie Jones]] in his ''Film/Ghostbusters2016'' review, saying her role as Patty was closest to the spirit of the original movie, had the most believable reactions to what was going on around her, and didn't wear a smirk during the entire film. In general, he makes a point of noting that all four actresses playing the new Ghostbusters are talented and funny comedians who were simply miscast.
** A slighter, but notable moment happens with director Paul Feig. While Plinkett still blames him for many of the film's glaring directorial issues, he notes part of it was to be pinned on Sony for choosing the wrong director, and many of said issues were likely born out of Feig's considerable amount of respect and love for his cast and crew. Given how controversial Feig is, it's surprisingly sweet hearing Plinkett saying that he's "probably a really nice guy. ''[[ExtremeDoormat Too]]'' [[ExtremeDoormat nice]], [[RunningTheAsylum in fact]]."
* Something simlair to the above happens in the ''Film/TheLastJedi'', where Plinkett also takes a couple of moments to acknowledge that Creator/RianJohnson by most reports and in the behind-the-scenes footage appears to be quite a nice and jovial guy who was certainly very passionate and serious about making a ''Star Wars'' film, and also clearly wanted to give a new, fresh spin on the property, and he evidently put a lot of work and thought into doing this, and he can respect him for that. But he still feels that Johnson ultimately failed on pretty every level in the task he set out to do.
----

Top