Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / WhoFramedRogerRabbit

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Perhaps they would continue to exist as ghosts and not truly be dead. And even it they don't, they were complicit in attempted genocide of their own kind, so they weren't exactly innocent.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** No, it's just RuleOfFunny, which is what Toontown pretty much runs on.

Added: 580

Changed: 41

Removed: 621

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

[[folder: Eddie running into Lena Hyena]]
* Okay, so Eddie finds Jessica's car in Toontown, and happens to spot what he believes to be her in the window in a hotel room only to discover it is an ugly toon named Lena Hyena who happens to look like an uglier version of Jessica. That is too much of a coincidence. Did Jessica know Lena, and had her stay in the suite as a trap for someone if they were following her? Or did it belong to Jessica, and Lena snuck in to take her clothes and try to make herself look like Jessica? Or perhaps she was moving into the suite and Jessica had given her some of he clothes?
[[/folder]]



[[folder: Eddie running into Lena Hyena]]
* Okay, so Eddie finds Jessica's car in Toontown, and happens to spot what he believes to be her in the window in a hotel room only to discover it is an ugly toon named Lena Hyena who happens to look like an uglier version of Jessica. That is too much of a coincidence. Did Jessica know Lena, and had her stay in the suite as a trap for someone if they were following her? Or did it belong to Jessica, and Lena snuck in to take her clothes and try to make herself look like Jessica? Or perhaps she was moving into the suite and Jessica had given her some of he clothes?
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Okay, so Eddie finds Jessica's car in Toontown, and happens to spot what he believes to be her in the window in a hotel room only to discover it is ugly toon named Lena Hyena who happens to look like an uglier version of Jessica. That's too much of a coincidence. Did Jessica know Lena, and had her stay in the suite as a trap for someone if they were following her? Or did it belong to Jessica, and Lena snuck in to take her clothes and try to make herself look like Jessica. Or perhaps she was moving into the suite and Jessica had given her some of he clothes?

to:

* Okay, so Eddie finds Jessica's car in Toontown, and happens to spot what he believes to be her in the window in a hotel room only to discover it is an ugly toon named Lena Hyena who happens to look like an uglier version of Jessica. That's That is too much of a coincidence. Did Jessica know Lena, and had her stay in the suite as a trap for someone if they were following her? Or did it belong to Jessica, and Lena snuck in to take her clothes and try to make herself look like Jessica. Jessica? Or perhaps she was moving into the suite and Jessica had given her some of he clothes?

Added: 11

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[/folder]]



* Okay, so Eddie finds Jessica's car in Toontown, and happens to spot what he believes to be her in the window in a hotel room only to discover it is ugly toon named Lena Hyena who happens to look like an uglier version of Jessica. That's too much of a coincidence. Did Jessica know Lena, and had her stay in the suite as a trap for someone if they were following her? Or did it belong to Jessica, and Lena snuck in to take her clothes and try to make herself look like Jessica. Or perhaps she was moving into the suite and Jessica had given her some of he clothes?

to:

* Okay, so Eddie finds Jessica's car in Toontown, and happens to spot what he believes to be her in the window in a hotel room only to discover it is ugly toon named Lena Hyena who happens to look like an uglier version of Jessica. That's too much of a coincidence. Did Jessica know Lena, and had her stay in the suite as a trap for someone if they were following her? her? Or did it belong to Jessica, and Lena snuck in to take her clothes and try to make herself look like Jessica. Jessica. Or perhaps she was moving into the suite and Jessica had given her some of he clothes?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder: Eddie running into Lena Hyena]]
* Okay, so Eddie finds Jessica's car in Toontown, and happens to spot what he believes to be her in the window in a hotel room only to discover it is ugly toon named Lena Hyena who happens to look like an uglier version of Jessica. That's too much of a coincidence. Did Jessica know Lena, and had her stay in the suite as a trap for someone if they were following her? Or did it belong to Jessica, and Lena snuck in to take her clothes and try to make herself look like Jessica. Or perhaps she was moving into the suite and Jessica had given her some of he clothes?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Why, to fix the [[IncrediblyLamePun plotholes]], naturally!

to:

** Why, to fix the [[IncrediblyLamePun [[{{Pun}} plotholes]], naturally!



** At the bar, Judge Doom hinted that he used to have hyenas as henchmen before the weasels, who were said to have laughed themselves to death. One could make the statement that Lena Hyena used to be at the same beauty standards as Jessica (hence why they appear the same at first) and that her appearance took a downturn after losing her husband, possibly a former [[IncrediblyLamePun henchman of Doom]]. She ended up hiding from the outside world, so no one knew about her changed appearance. And when she decided to go looking for love after getting over her being a widow, she had reached the point of thinking she was supposed to chase down the objects of her affection. (In a similar vein to how Judge Doom was a Toon actor who played villainous roles until an accident left him thinking he truly was a villain.)

to:

** At the bar, Judge Doom hinted that he used to have hyenas as henchmen before the weasels, who were said to have laughed themselves to death. One could make the statement that Lena Hyena used to be at the same beauty standards as Jessica (hence why they appear the same at first) and that her appearance took a downturn after losing her husband, possibly a former [[IncrediblyLamePun [[{{Pun}} henchman of Doom]]. She ended up hiding from the outside world, so no one knew about her changed appearance. And when she decided to go looking for love after getting over her being a widow, she had reached the point of thinking she was supposed to chase down the objects of her affection. (In a similar vein to how Judge Doom was a Toon actor who played villainous roles until an accident left him thinking he truly was a villain.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Since the exact nature of Cloverleaf's corporate and financial structure is not elaborated on, it's likely that Doom actually "owns" the company through various dummy corporations and fronts which avoid this kind of attention; he just refers to himself as "the sole stockholder" for purposes of simplification, since the end result is the same and he's expecting the people he's talking with to be dead in a few minutes anyway.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Metropolis is likely just as real as the house at the beginning of the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** I guess it depends on what would be the ‘funniest’ outcome. The Abhorrent Admirer gag can actually play out a number of ways, up to and including Eddie being forced to marry Lena and spending the rest of his life with her. So I guess he lucked out there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Toons operating on RuleOfFunny gives us another explanation: a lot of comedy bits involve a StraightManAndWiseGuy relationship. In this case, Doom (and by extension the Weasels since they're working with him) play the role of the serious Straight Man to Roger's wacky Wise Guy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Given the fact that it was Marvin Acme who was fraternizing with his wife, Roger may have had the motive to inflict bodily harm upon him. However, also considering that he’s a goofball, both on camera and off, he just doesn’t seem like the type who would even dream of murder. Therefore, what reason (besides the aforementioned cheating) would the authorities have to suspect him of such a thing?
* As incredible as it is to think a lovably goofy toon like Roger would even be put in the same ''sentence'' with murder, a human being's death at the hands of a toon does have precedent. Taking into account [[ADeadlyAffair the classic motive of infidelity]], so to speak; Roger’s recent HostilityOnTheSet; the rather {{slapstick}} MO in which Acme was killed (dropping a safe on his head); R.K.’s account of Roger’s rage the previous night, and the yellow paint found at the crime scene, it all gave the authorities who they thought was the only logical suspect no matter how seemingly absurd. Plus, there’s likely a discriminatory bias against toons automatically ruling out human foul play.

to:

* Given the fact that it was Marvin Acme who was fraternizing with his wife, Roger may have had the motive to inflict bodily harm upon him. However, also considering that he’s a goofball, both on camera and off, he just doesn’t seem like the type who would even dream of murder. Therefore, what reason (besides the aforementioned cheating) would the authorities have to suspect him of such a thing?
* ** As incredible as it is to think a lovably goofy toon like Roger would even be put in the same ''sentence'' with murder, a human being's death at the hands of a toon does have precedent. Taking into account [[ADeadlyAffair the classic motive of infidelity]], so to speak; Roger’s recent HostilityOnTheSet; the rather {{slapstick}} MO in which Acme was killed (dropping a safe on his head); R.K.’s account of Roger’s rage the previous night, and the yellow paint found at the crime scene, it all gave the authorities who they thought was the only logical suspect no matter how seemingly absurd. Plus, there’s likely a discriminatory bias against toons automatically ruling out human foul play.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Me and a friend used to joke about this all the time. The joke would go that a digitally-animated character would take a dip bath and be unharmed... only to then have their computer encounter a BlueScreenOfDeath.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** As for why Roger's performance was suffering, well, the newspapers were speculating about Jessica and Acme, so it's not unlikely he knew there were rumors. While he clearly didn't think Jessica would willingly be unfaithful to him, that doesn't mean he couldn't have been worried about her. After all, she could be in some kind of trouble and being forced to do things she didn't want to do (and really, that ''was'' exactly what was going on). Being worried about his wife could certainly affect his performance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* As incredible as it is think a lovably goofy toon like Roger would even be put in the same ''sentence'' with murder, a human being's death at the hands of a toon does have precedent. Taking into account [[ADeadlyAffair the classic motive of infidelity]], so to speak; Roger’s recent HostilityOnTheSet; the rather {{slapstick}} MO in which Acme was killed (dropping a safe on his head); R.K.’s account of Roger’s rage the previous night, and the yellow paint found at the crime scene, it all gave authorities who they thought was the only logical suspect no matter how seemingly absurd. Plus, there’s likely a discriminatory bias against toons automatically ruling out human foul play…or at least who looked human.

to:

* As incredible as it is to think a lovably goofy toon like Roger would even be put in the same ''sentence'' with murder, a human being's death at the hands of a toon does have precedent. Taking into account [[ADeadlyAffair the classic motive of infidelity]], so to speak; Roger’s recent HostilityOnTheSet; the rather {{slapstick}} MO in which Acme was killed (dropping a safe on his head); R.K.’s account of Roger’s rage the previous night, and the yellow paint found at the crime scene, it all gave the authorities who they thought was the only logical suspect no matter how seemingly absurd. Plus, there’s likely a discriminatory bias against toons automatically ruling out human foul play…or at least who looked human.play.



* Is it even possible for a publically-traded stock to have a single owner, at least without drawing some raised eyebrows?

to:

* Is it even possible for a publically-traded publicly-traded stock to have a single owner, at least without drawing some raised eyebrows?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** I don't know if this is a separate thing, but this makes me wonder about different art styles, characterization, etc. Mickey Mouse was an adventurous troublemaker in his early cartoons, compared to the nice guy of later cartoons. Daffy Duck was smaller and insane, yelling "WOOHOO!!!" in the 30s and 40s, before becoming a bitter, short tempered schemer in the 1950s. Are they different "people" in the toon universe? Is it just makeup and scriptwriters? The characters all seem to act basically the same in real life as they do in their pictures.


Added DiffLines:

* It's likely he was created as a cartoon villian who was the foil to the wacky, funny cartoon characters who wasn't originally actually evil. He developed a mental illness that broke down his ability to tell real life from a role in his cartoons.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[folder:Cloverleaf]]
* Is it even possible for a publically-traded stock to have a single owner, at least without drawing some raised eyebrows?
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Then again, Acme was already shown as being a man-childish weirdo, albeit a good-natured one. Who knows what kind of odd kiddy games he finds kinky?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** If you want to stick with Toons being created specifically by animators to star in films, it's possible that AlternateHistory is at play and some of these movies were released faster than they were in real life. Since they could be filmed on location with Toon actors instead of having to be hand-drawn frame-by-frame, a studio like Disney could theoretically produce animated films a lot faster and cheaper than did in the real world.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* As incredible as it is think a lovably goofy toon like Roger would even be put in the same ''sentence'' with murder, a human being's death at the hands of a toon does have precedent. Taking into account [[ADeadlyAffair the classic motive of infidelity]], so to speak; Roger’s recent HostilityOnTheSet; the rather {{slapstick}} MO in which Acme was killed (dropping a safe); R.K.’s account of Roger’s rage the previous night, and the yellow paint found at the crime scene, it all gave authorities who they thought was the only logical lead no matter how absurd. Plus, there’s likely a discriminatory bias against toons automatically ruling out human foul play…or at least who looked human.

to:

* As incredible as it is think a lovably goofy toon like Roger would even be put in the same ''sentence'' with murder, a human being's death at the hands of a toon does have precedent. Taking into account [[ADeadlyAffair the classic motive of infidelity]], so to speak; Roger’s recent HostilityOnTheSet; the rather {{slapstick}} MO in which Acme was killed (dropping a safe); safe on his head); R.K.’s account of Roger’s rage the previous night, and the yellow paint found at the crime scene, it all gave authorities who they thought was the only logical lead suspect no matter how seemingly absurd. Plus, there’s likely a discriminatory bias against toons automatically ruling out human foul play…or at least who looked human.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* As incredible as it is think a lovably goofy toon like Roger would even be put in the same ''sentence'' with murder, a human being's death at the hands of a toon does have precedent. Taking into account the classic motive of [[YourCheatingHeart infidelity]], so to speak; Roger’s recent HostilityOnTheSet; the rather {{slapstick}} MO in which Acme was killed (dropping a safe); R.K.’s account of Roger’s rage the previous night, and the yellow paint found at the crime scene, it all gave authorities the only logical lead to who the perpetrator was no matter how absurd. Plus, there’s likely a discriminatory bias against toons automatically ruling out human foul play…or at least who they thought were human.

to:

* As incredible as it is think a lovably goofy toon like Roger would even be put in the same ''sentence'' with murder, a human being's death at the hands of a toon does have precedent. Taking into account [[ADeadlyAffair the classic motive of [[YourCheatingHeart infidelity]], so to speak; Roger’s recent HostilityOnTheSet; the rather {{slapstick}} MO in which Acme was killed (dropping a safe); R.K.’s account of Roger’s rage the previous night, and the yellow paint found at the crime scene, it all gave authorities who they thought was the only logical lead to who the perpetrator was no matter how absurd. Plus, there’s likely a discriminatory bias against toons automatically ruling out human foul play…or at least who they thought were looked human.

Added: 711

Changed: -2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Roger rabbit: Acme murder prime suspect…why?]]

to:

[[folder:Roger rabbit: Rabbit: Acme murder prime suspect…why?]]


Added DiffLines:

* As incredible as it is think a lovably goofy toon like Roger would even be put in the same ''sentence'' with murder, a human being's death at the hands of a toon does have precedent. Taking into account the classic motive of [[YourCheatingHeart infidelity]], so to speak; Roger’s recent HostilityOnTheSet; the rather {{slapstick}} MO in which Acme was killed (dropping a safe); R.K.’s account of Roger’s rage the previous night, and the yellow paint found at the crime scene, it all gave authorities the only logical lead to who the perpetrator was no matter how absurd. Plus, there’s likely a discriminatory bias against toons automatically ruling out human foul play…or at least who they thought were human.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[TheBadGuyWins If Judge Doom's plan of dissolving ToonTown and paving a freeway over it had succeeded]], what would have happened to toons created after the 40s events of the film, such as WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons, ComicStrip/{{Garfield}}, WesternAnimation/SpongeBobSquarePants, and WesternAnimation/{{Shrek}}? Would they have never existed?

to:

* [[TheBadGuyWins If Judge Doom's plan of dissolving ToonTown and paving a freeway over it had succeeded]], what would have happened to toons created after the 40s events of the film, such as WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons, ComicStrip/{{Garfield}}, WesternAnimation/SpongeBobSquarePants, and WesternAnimation/{{Shrek}}? Franchise/{{Shrek}}? Would they have never existed?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Headscratchers for ''Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit''.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[folder:Roger rabbit: Acme murder prime suspect…why?]]
Given the fact that it was Marvin Acme who was fraternizing with his wife, Roger may have had the motive to inflict bodily harm upon him. However, also considering that he’s a goofball, both on camera and off, he just doesn’t seem like the type who would even dream of murder. Therefore, what reason (besides the aforementioned cheating) would the authorities have to suspect him of such a thing?
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** I think the ways in which it is possible for toons to affect humans depends partly on intent, partly on storytelling. Doom was able to kill Teddy in Toontown, because he wanted him to really die, and also because it served Eddie's story for Teddy to die. Whereas Eddie survives stuff like being flattened to the ground in the elevator or falling off the skyscraper because none of the toons involved meant him any harm, and it's funnier if he survives. So it could be that toons ''could'' save people's lives through toon means if it would make a better story for them to live.

Top