Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 45 (click to see context) from:
to:
** It’s a focus phrase. In order to summon the armor and sword, Jim needs to focus his emotions and thoughts on doing so. Odds are he doesn’t need to use the incantation at all for it to work (and in fact he’s shown both summoning them without saying the phrase as well as saying the phrase and not summoning them), but concentrating the way he needs to while in a dangerous or distracting situation can be challenging so reciting part or the whole thing out loud helps him do that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
to:
*** Unfortunately, I must disagree with this a bit. The first time he loses it—when it’s stolen by the gnome—Jim does try to summon it back, and that’s what prompts the explanation from Blinky that the amulet won’t return if it’s stolen.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 187,188 (click to see context) from:
*** From Wiki/TheOtherWiki: ''"Initially the concept of the armor was that it should feel somewhat bulky on Jim, as it was not meant to be worn by a human, representing Jim's struggle with his sense of responsibility of being a Trollhunter. That idea, however, negated the concept of the armor being its own magical being that adapts to its wearer. The armor itself is a character. We decided to streamline the concept and make it fit as much like a second skin on Jim as possible."'' Basically, it might be purely symbolic: Because skin can heal itself, so can Jim's armour. But the sword isn't "skin", sooo... Adding to this, there's nothing to really... Suggest the sword can repair itself. If it were shattered then stored in the amulet, it would still be in pieces.
to:
*** From Wiki/TheOtherWiki: Website/TheOtherWiki: ''"Initially the concept of the armor was that it should feel somewhat bulky on Jim, as it was not meant to be worn by a human, representing Jim's struggle with his sense of responsibility of being a Trollhunter. That idea, however, negated the concept of the armor being its own magical being that adapts to its wearer. The armor itself is a character. We decided to streamline the concept and make it fit as much like a second skin on Jim as possible."'' Basically, it might be purely symbolic: Because skin can heal itself, so can Jim's armour. But the sword isn't "skin", sooo... Adding to this, there's nothing to really... Suggest the sword can repair itself. If it were shattered then stored in the amulet, it would still be in pieces.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 187,190 (click to see context) from:
*** From Wiki/TheOtherWiki: ''"Initially the concept of the armor was that it should feel somewhat bulky on Jim, as it was not meant to be worn by a human, representing Jim's struggle with his sense of responsibility of being a Trollhunter. That idea, however, negated the concept of the armor being its own magical being that adapts to its wearer. The armor itself is a character. We decided to streamline the concept and make it fit as much like a second skin on Jim as possible."'' Basically, it might be purely symbolic: Because skin can heal itself, so can Jim's armour. But the sword isn't "skin", sooo...
# Adding to this, there's nothing to really... Suggest the sword can repair itself. If it were shattered then stored in the amulet, it would still be in pieces.
# Adding to this, there's nothing to really... Suggest the sword can repair itself. If it were shattered then stored in the amulet, it would still be in pieces.
to:
*** From Wiki/TheOtherWiki: ''"Initially the concept of the armor was that it should feel somewhat bulky on Jim, as it was not meant to be worn by a human, representing Jim's struggle with his sense of responsibility of being a Trollhunter. That idea, however, negated the concept of the armor being its own magical being that adapts to its wearer. The armor itself is a character. We decided to streamline the concept and make it fit as much like a second skin on Jim as possible."'' Basically, it might be purely symbolic: Because skin can heal itself, so can Jim's armour. But the sword isn't "skin", sooo...
#sooo... Adding to this, there's nothing to really... Suggest the sword can repair itself. If it were shattered then stored in the amulet, it would still be in pieces.
#
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 189,190 (click to see context) from:
Adding to this, there's nothing to really... Suggest the sword can repair itself. If it were shattered then stored in the amulet, it would still be in pieces.
to:
# Adding to this, there's nothing to really... Suggest the sword can repair itself. If it were shattered then stored in the amulet, it would still be in pieces.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
Adding to this, there's nothing to really... Suggest the sword can repair itself. If it were shattered then stored in the amulet, it would still be in pieces.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 187,188 (click to see context) from:
*** From Wiki/TheOtherWiki: ''"Initially the concept of the armor was that it should feel somewhat bulky on Jim, as it was not meant to be worn by a human, representing Jim's struggle with his sense of responsibility of being a Trollhunter. That idea, however, negated the concept of the armor being its own magical being that adapts to its wearer. The armor itself is a character. We decided to streamline the concept and make it fit as much like a second skin on Jim as possible."'' Basically, it might be purely symbolic: Because skin can heal itself, so can Jim's armour. But the sword isn't skin, sooo...
to:
*** From Wiki/TheOtherWiki: ''"Initially the concept of the armor was that it should feel somewhat bulky on Jim, as it was not meant to be worn by a human, representing Jim's struggle with his sense of responsibility of being a Trollhunter. That idea, however, negated the concept of the armor being its own magical being that adapts to its wearer. The armor itself is a character. We decided to streamline the concept and make it fit as much like a second skin on Jim as possible."'' Basically, it might be purely symbolic: Because skin can heal itself, so can Jim's armour. But the sword isn't skin, "skin", sooo...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 187,188 (click to see context) from:
*** From Wiki/TheOtherWiki: "Initially the concept of the armor was that it should feel somewhat bulky on Jim, as it was not meant to be worn by a human, representing Jim's struggle with his sense of responsibility of being a Trollhunter. That idea, however, negated the concept of the armor being its own magical being that adapts to its wearer. The armor itself is a character. We decided to streamline the concept and make it fit as much like a second skin on Jim as possible." Basically, it might be purely symbolic: Because skin can heal itself, so can Jim's armour. But the sword isn't skin, sooo...
to:
*** From Wiki/TheOtherWiki: "Initially ''"Initially the concept of the armor was that it should feel somewhat bulky on Jim, as it was not meant to be worn by a human, representing Jim's struggle with his sense of responsibility of being a Trollhunter. That idea, however, negated the concept of the armor being its own magical being that adapts to its wearer. The armor itself is a character. We decided to streamline the concept and make it fit as much like a second skin on Jim as possible." "'' Basically, it might be purely symbolic: Because skin can heal itself, so can Jim's armour. But the sword isn't skin, sooo...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 187,188 (click to see context) from:
*** From Wiki/TheOtherWiki: "Initially the concept of the armor was that it should feel somewhat bulky on Jim, as it was not meant to be worn by a human, representing Jim's struggle with his sense of responsibility of being a Trollhunter. That idea, however, negated the concept of the armor being its own magical being that adapts to its wearer. The armor itself is a character. We decided to streamline the concept and make it fit as much like a second skin on Jim as possible." Basically, it might purely be symbolic: Because skin can heal itself, so can Jim's armour. But the sword isn't skin, sooo...
to:
*** From Wiki/TheOtherWiki: "Initially the concept of the armor was that it should feel somewhat bulky on Jim, as it was not meant to be worn by a human, representing Jim's struggle with his sense of responsibility of being a Trollhunter. That idea, however, negated the concept of the armor being its own magical being that adapts to its wearer. The armor itself is a character. We decided to streamline the concept and make it fit as much like a second skin on Jim as possible." Basically, it might be purely be symbolic: Because skin can heal itself, so can Jim's armour. But the sword isn't skin, sooo...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 187,188 (click to see context) from:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is not only made up of magic, but Daylight. Daylight is a fictional ore. Assuming reparation of the armour can be done with the amulet, said armour is not made up of Daylight.
to:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is not only made up of magic, but Daylight. Daylight is a fictional ore. Assuming reparation From Wiki/TheOtherWiki: "Initially the concept of the armour can armor was that it should feel somewhat bulky on Jim, as it was not meant to be done worn by a human, representing Jim's struggle with his sense of responsibility of being a Trollhunter. That idea, however, negated the amulet, said armour concept of the armor being its own magical being that adapts to its wearer. The armor itself is not made up of Daylight.
a character. We decided to streamline the concept and make it fit as much like a second skin on Jim as possible." Basically, it might purely be symbolic: Because skin can heal itself, so can Jim's armour. But the sword isn't skin, sooo...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 187,188 (click to see context) from:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is not only made up of magic, but Daylight. Daylight is a fictional ore.
to:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is not only made up of magic, but Daylight. Daylight is a fictional ore.
ore. Assuming reparation of the armour can be done with the amulet, said armour is not made up of Daylight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 187,188 (click to see context) from:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is made up of Daylight, not magic. Daylight is a fictional ore. Assuming that reparation of the armour can be done without Merlin's help, it is not made up of Daylight.
to:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is not only made up of Daylight, not magic. magic, but Daylight. Daylight is a fictional ore. Assuming that reparation of the armour can be done without Merlin's help, it is not made up of Daylight.
ore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 187,188 (click to see context) from:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is made up of Daylight, not magic. Daylight is a fictional ore.
to:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is made up of Daylight, not magic. Daylight is a fictional ore.
ore. Assuming that reparation of the armour can be done without Merlin's help, it is not made up of Daylight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 187,188 (click to see context) from:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is made up of Daylight, not magic. Therefore, like any other material or metallic-like object, it must be repaired.
to:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is made up of Daylight, not magic. Therefore, like any other material or metallic-like object, it must be repaired.
Daylight is a fictional ore.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 187,188 (click to see context) from:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is made up of Daylight, not magic. Maybe Daylight-restoring magic has yet to be invented.
to:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is made up of Daylight, not magic. Maybe Daylight-restoring magic has yet to Therefore, like any other material or metallic-like object, it must be invented.
repaired.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 187,188 (click to see context) from:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is made up of Daylight, not magic.
to:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is made up of Daylight, not magic.
magic. Maybe Daylight-restoring magic has yet to be invented.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 187 (click to see context) from:
to:
*** Well then there's your answer: It is made up of Daylight, not magic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 186 (click to see context) from:
to:
*** It is specifically stated early on that it is indeed made of Daylight and, not actual metal and besides that still leaves, all of the previously mentioned questions, without any answers!
