Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
** If it was just about uploading her, he wouldn't have refused when she tried to bait him at the end. He did it because he wanted to save Max.
** Considering Will is not responsible for those things, it's irrelevant.
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
to:
** 1) Yes, they make that pretty clear. 2) That would be the people who shot him then refused him the treatment that would have saved him. So RIFT.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
[[folder:Digging a tunnel]]
*The Brightwood Data center is five stories underground. That implies some digging equipment and sensors. How on EARTH did the Feds and RIFT dig under the solar panel farm without anyone knowing? They couldn't use heavy machinery. They were close to the surface.
[[/folder]]
*The Brightwood Data center is five stories underground. That implies some digging equipment and sensors. How on EARTH did the Feds and RIFT dig under the solar panel farm without anyone knowing? They couldn't use heavy machinery. They were close to the surface.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 9,10 (click to see context) from:
* To simplify my question into two concretely detailed questions: 1) Did Martin die? 2) Who is primarily morally responsible for his death?
to:
* To simplify my question into two concretely detailed questions: 1) Did Martin (Clifton Collins Jr) die? 2) Who is primarily morally responsible for his death?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 8 (click to see context) from:
* If so, the implication is that the love story reunion happy ending is at the expense of 1) thousands to millions of implied immediate deaths (car wrecks, plane crashes, hospital outages, supply chain disruptions, etc), and 2) undoing the industrial revolution in many manys (i.e. even more deaths and dramatically lower living standards for billions for years)? Is that supposed to be romantic?
to:
* If so, the implication is that the love story reunion happy ending is at the expense of 1) thousands to millions of implied immediate deaths (car wrecks, plane crashes, hospital outages, supply chain disruptions, etc), and 2) undoing the industrial revolution in many manys ways (i.e. even more deaths and dramatically lower living standards for billions for years)? Is that supposed to be romantic?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
new page and first folder
Added DiffLines:
New entries at the bottom. '''Beware spoilers!'''
[[foldercontrol]]
[[folder:What literally happened at the end? SPOILERS!]]
* What is the writer's intended ending? I interpreted that cyber-Will arranged all this to reunite with Evelyn. That is, he kept offering her to digitize, but she refused. So the whole crisis was intended to force her to make the leap into digital world and upload herself. Did cyber-Will arrange this entire caper (i.e. from upload to end credits) with the main goal of reuniting with Evelyn?
* If so, the implication is that the love story reunion happy ending is at the expense of 1) thousands to millions of implied immediate deaths (car wrecks, plane crashes, hospital outages, supply chain disruptions, etc), and 2) undoing the industrial revolution in many manys (i.e. even more deaths and dramatically lower living standards for billions for years)? Is that supposed to be romantic?
* To simplify my question into two concretely detailed questions: 1) Did Martin die? 2) Who is primarily morally responsible for his death?
[[/folder]]
[[foldercontrol]]
[[folder:What literally happened at the end? SPOILERS!]]
* What is the writer's intended ending? I interpreted that cyber-Will arranged all this to reunite with Evelyn. That is, he kept offering her to digitize, but she refused. So the whole crisis was intended to force her to make the leap into digital world and upload herself. Did cyber-Will arrange this entire caper (i.e. from upload to end credits) with the main goal of reuniting with Evelyn?
* If so, the implication is that the love story reunion happy ending is at the expense of 1) thousands to millions of implied immediate deaths (car wrecks, plane crashes, hospital outages, supply chain disruptions, etc), and 2) undoing the industrial revolution in many manys (i.e. even more deaths and dramatically lower living standards for billions for years)? Is that supposed to be romantic?
* To simplify my question into two concretely detailed questions: 1) Did Martin die? 2) Who is primarily morally responsible for his death?
[[/folder]]
