History Headscratchers / TheBible

29th Sep '17 9:22:58 AM WarriorSparrow
Is there an issue? Send a Message




to:

\n*** I think the reason that's not brought up in the Bible is because the writers didn't know that intersex people even existed. It is only about 1 in 2000 births, after all, the the geographical area in which the Bible takes place didn't encompass everyone in the world.

29th Sep '17 9:13:53 AM WarriorSparrow
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** Not to mention there's ''nothing in the Bible'' about Satan "becoming prideful and wanting humans to worship him". That common misconception is a case of CriticalResearchFailure concerning Isaiah 14, as Lucifer is actually a Babylonian king and nothing to do with Satan. It's clear if you actually read all of the chapter and not projecting an incorrect assumption on verses 12-15.
29th Sep '17 5:39:33 AM WarriorSparrow
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** Except "Lucifer" has nothing to do with Satan and never did. "Lucifer" was a term used for a Babylonian King in the proverb detailed in Isaiah 14. It's clear if you actually read the chapter, but people just think Lucifer is Satan due to going off of hearsay on verses 12-15 and a mass case of CriticalResearchFailure. There's nothing whatsoever about Satan revelling against God in any form. In fact, Satan worked for God in Job. Just clearing things up.



*** Except the serpent in Genesis was just said to be a serpent. The punishment to slither on the ground would make no sense otherwise.



** Not to mention ''Lucifer wasn't even Satan''. "Lucifer" was just a term for an arrogant Babylonian king. People just parrot that Lucifer is Satan because they read verses 12-15, assume that's what it means, and that's it. But Isaiah 14 ''as a whole'' clearly, unambiguously states that Lucifer/Morning Star is just a term for that arrogant Babylonian king. The fact that people assume otherwise is simply a frustratingly massive case of CriticalResearchFailure.




to:

*** Except they weren't tempted by Satan, just a serpent. And it's not that the knowledge would surpass even God's, it's that Adam and Eve would know what good and evil are ''period''. The serpent didn't lie in saying that they'd become like God, because they did through knowing good and evil—in that sense we're as much like God as the serpent said. The serpent's lie was that they wouldn't die, which they started to after eating from the tree.


Added DiffLines:

** I think that if they had eaten of the tree of life beforehand, nothing would have happened. After all, they were already immortal at the time, so it would have just been like us eating any other fruit. It was that they couldn't live forever while having knowledge. Which actually casts doubt onto the goodness of God's character—either you are ignorant and live forever or you know things but you die? Why can't we have both?
29th Sep '17 5:03:58 AM WarriorSparrow
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** Except he didn't. That's actually a frustratingly common misconception, as the only supposed "trying to usurp God and cast down" thing in the Bible does not refer to Satan at all, and "Lucifer" in Isaiah 14 is directly stated to be the King of Babylon in a proverb—it's simply a widespread case of CriticalResearchFailure to think otherwise, as most people simply believe that verses 12-15 refer to Satan when a full read of the chapter shows that's not the case. The Bible itself gives no indication that Satan "fell" or tried to usurp God in any fashion. In fact the one main point where he appears at all is in Job, where he actually works for God like a prosecuting attorney.
28th Sep '17 10:53:48 PM FireBoss
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** Disproportionate maybe but, not fair. Heaven and hell apparently operate under the same kind of reward punishment system. Everyone who goes to heaven is treated with the same kind of reward an infinite amount of pleasure even though not everyone there has done the same amount of good. So yes, one's treatment in the afterlife is not a direct measurement of the amount of good or evil that done in their life. He simply sees it as those who follow his way and those who don't. It's like school year beat the standard or you don't simple as that. God has no obligation to create a third destination since no one dirctly benefits from it except the people who don't follow his way.

to:

*** Disproportionate maybe but, maybe, but not fair. Heaven and hell apparently operate under the same kind of reward punishment system. Everyone who goes to heaven is treated with the same kind of reward an infinite amount of pleasure even though not everyone there has done the same amount of good. So yes, one's treatment in the afterlife is not a direct measurement of the amount of good or evil that done in their life. He simply sees it as those who follow his way and those who don't. It's like school year beat yout either meet the standard or you don't simple as that. God has no obligation to create a third destination since no one dirctly benefits from it except the people who don't follow his way.the afterlife is simply a pass or fail system.
28th Sep '17 5:12:51 PM FireBoss
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

***Disproportionate maybe but, not fair. Heaven and hell apparently operate under the same kind of reward punishment system. Everyone who goes to heaven is treated with the same kind of reward an infinite amount of pleasure even though not everyone there has done the same amount of good. So yes, one's treatment in the afterlife is not a direct measurement of the amount of good or evil that done in their life. He simply sees it as those who follow his way and those who don't. It's like school year beat the standard or you don't simple as that. God has no obligation to create a third destination since no one dirctly benefits from it except the people who don't follow his way.
28th Sep '17 4:42:07 PM FireBoss
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** In response above Your analogy is flawed since overly and grossly simplified of choices God gives you. While it's true there is ultimately two choices you can pick. You still have full say and when and how you choose to pick them, You still have many choices to make while following God's will. Think of it as a game of Fable while there is ultimately two path good or evil it's still a long complexes branch of decisions. furthermore there are many Crossroads in an individual's life where they are ultimately given two choices for example your choice in life is either to get married or not, find a job or not,raiseraise a child or not, While there is no third option you can choose when,where,and how. To make a long story short Free Will as you described simply does not exist in this world PERIOD!! God or no God.
*** Might be true that true free will does not exist as you say, but that doesn't change the idea of desproportional punishment, even we as humans do not punish in the same way the mass murderer and the rober. At least Catholics get that and created the afterlife version of probation (purgatory).

to:

*** In response above Your analogy is flawed since overly and grossly simplified of choices God gives you. While it's true there is ultimately two choices you can pick. You still have full say and when and how you choose to pick them, You still have many choices to make while following God's will. Think of it as a game of Fable while there is ultimately two path good or evil it's still a long complexes branch of decisions. furthermore there are many Crossroads in an individual's life where they are ultimately given two choices for example your choice in life is either to get married or not, find a job or not,raiseraise raise a child or not, While there is no third option you can choose when,where,and how. To make a long story short Free Will as you described simply does not exist in this world PERIOD!! God or no God.
*** Might be true that true free will does not exist as you say, but that doesn't change the idea of desproportional punishment, even we as humans do not punish in the same way the mass murderer and the rober. At least Catholics get that and created the afterlife version of probation (purgatory).
27th Sep '17 9:42:31 AM WarriorSparrow
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** Except it doesn't. As a matter of fact it has nothing to do with Satan whatsoever. "Lucifer" just refers to a Babylonian king in a proverb and nothing more than that.
27th Sep '17 9:40:55 AM WarriorSparrow
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** You're correct, second poster above me, "Lucifer" was just a term for an ancient Babyloninan king and has nothing to do with Satan. People just assume it to a frustrating degree without actually, you know, reading. Same goes for the serpent in Eden for that matter, that was just a serpent.
27th Sep '17 9:39:06 AM WarriorSparrow
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** "Lucifer" actually wasn't Satan, just a term used for an ancient Babylonian king in a proverb. It's clear it you read all of Isaiah 14, but unfortunately so many people have heard otherwise and just have verses 12-15 quoted that it's become a case of CriticalResearchFailure.
This list shows the last 10 events of 914. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Headscratchers.TheBible