Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / TheAdventuresOfIchabodAndMrToad

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The deed was necessary because it contained Mr. Winkie's signature, proving Toad and Cyril were telling the truth and that Winkie lied on the stand.

Changed: 633

Removed: 158

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
New recent evidence disproving theories


** If the Horseman really is a ghost, its unlikely he needs the correct parts to produce a laugh. More likely however, what Ichabod saw was the top part of Brom Bones's scalp, which in the dark and in Ichabod's panicked state, probably looked either like pitch darkness or a severed head kept inside the Horseman's coat.
** Considering Ichabod is familiar with Brom's voice from prior encounters, and Brom would want the "Horseman"'s eerie laughter to sound as spooky as possible, it's also possible that Brom stuffed some kind of funnel into the collar of the costume to make his laughs echo creepily.
** It's a farming community. If Brom ''really'' wanted to be thorough, he could've stretched some black fabric stained with animal blood across the neck hole.

to:

** If Probably the top of his neck. The Horseman really can laugh anyway because he is a ghost, its unlikely he needs the correct parts to produce a laugh. More likely however, what Ichabod saw was the top part of ghost/specter. The Brom Bones's scalp, which theory was Jossed in the dark and in Ichabod's panicked state, probably looked either like pitch darkness or [[WesternAnimation/OnceUponAStudio Once Upon a severed head kept inside the Horseman's coat.
** Considering Ichabod is familiar with Brom's voice from prior encounters, and Brom would want the "Horseman"'s eerie laughter to sound as spooky as possible, it's also possible that Brom stuffed some kind of funnel into the collar of the costume to make his laughs echo creepily.
** It's a farming community. If Brom ''really'' wanted to be thorough, he could've stretched some black fabric stained with animal blood across the neck hole.
Studio]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** If the Horseman really is a ghost, its unlikely he needs the correct parts to produce a laugh. More likely however, what Ichabod saw was the top part of Brom Bones scalp, which in the dark and in Ichabod's panicked state, probably looked either like pitch darkness or a severed head kept inside the Horsemans coat.

to:

** If the Horseman really is a ghost, its unlikely he needs the correct parts to produce a laugh. More likely however, what Ichabod saw was the top part of Brom Bones Bones's scalp, which in the dark and in Ichabod's panicked state, probably looked either like pitch darkness or a severed head kept inside the Horsemans Horseman's coat.

Added: 1123

Removed: 702

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* More of a meta example, but ''why'' was "Mr. Toad's Wild Ride" so scary? There's no horror in the Wind in the Willows part of the movie — all NightmareFuel comes from the last 5 minutes or so of the Sleepy Hollow part. Toad most certainly doesn't get hit by a train, die and go to hell! Why end the ride that way?
** Mr Toad's Wild Ride mostly follows it's own narrative and considering it was decided to make it a Dark Ride, it makes sense that they expanded on the scarier imagery. The actual Wind and the Willows segment also had some unsettling moments. The scene were Toad almost accidently drowns himself after the train chase certainly disturbed this troper the first time he watched the movie.


Added DiffLines:

* It wasn't necessary to get the deed. The very presence of the Weasels in Toad Hall confirms the Defense's story.
* Crane briefly looks down the collar of the Headless Horseman, and shivers as it laughs up at him. What did he see, and what produced the laugh?
** [[NothingIsScarier The fact that you don't know how it's produced makes the laugh even more terrifying]].
** If the Horseman really is a ghost, its unlikely he needs the correct parts to produce a laugh. More likely however, what Ichabod saw was the top part of Brom Bones scalp, which in the dark and in Ichabod's panicked state, probably looked either like pitch darkness or a severed head kept inside the Horsemans coat.
** Considering Ichabod is familiar with Brom's voice from prior encounters, and Brom would want the "Horseman"'s eerie laughter to sound as spooky as possible, it's also possible that Brom stuffed some kind of funnel into the collar of the costume to make his laughs echo creepily.
** It's a farming community. If Brom ''really'' wanted to be thorough, he could've stretched some black fabric stained with animal blood across the neck hole.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Cyril's testimony was a secondhand account since he stayed outside the pub when Toad went inside to make the deal. The court would've assumed that Toad had lied to Cyril about what happened, which means his testimony doesn't qualify for perjury.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Meta questions aren't allowed


* Anybody notice that, for all the talk about Disneyfication, their version of ''Literature/TheLegendOfSleepyHollow'' is more true to the book than the Creator/TimBurton version?
** That's because Burton's version was a loose retelling and not the actual story, much like how his ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' wasn't meant to be an exact retelling of those books. Hence why his movie is titled just ''Film/SleepyHollow1999'' instead of the book's (and Disney's) title ''The Legend of Sleepy Hollow''.
** At the same time, it's a simple tale anyways, making this into a Feature Length movie would take a ''lot'' of AdaptationExpansion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* During the Headless Horseman song, Ichabod's got a pile of... pink mush on his plate. What was that suppose to be? Mashed potatoes? Hasty pudding?

to:

* During the Headless Horseman song, Ichabod's got a pile of... pink mush on his plate. What was that suppose supposed to be? Mashed potatoes? Hasty pudding?

Added: 176

Changed: 455

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Also, just how DID Toad manage to get out of his cell unnoticed? Yes, he's DisguisedInDrag, but unlike the book, there's no reason for a woman to be hanging around a prison cell.

to:

** Mr Toad's Wild Ride mostly follows it's own narrative and considering it was decided to make it a Dark Ride, it makes sense that they expanded on the scarier imagery. The actual Wind and the Willows segment also had some unsettling moments. The scene were Toad almost accidently drowns himself after the train chase certainly disturbed this troper the first time he watched the movie.
* Also, just Also, how DID Toad manage to get out of his cell unnoticed? Yes, he's DisguisedInDrag, but unlike the book, there's no reason for a woman to be hanging around a prison cell.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* During the Headless Horseman song, Ichabod's got a pile of...pink mush on his plate. What was that suppose to be? Mashed potatoes? Hasty pudding?
** Its gelatin dessert. The story is set in 1790 and the dessert was around as early as 1747.
* More of a meta example, but ''why'' was "Mr. Toad's Wild Ride" so scary? There's no horror in the Wind in the Willows part of the movie - all NightmareFuel comes from the last 5 minutes or so of the Sleepy Hollow part. Toad most certainly doesn't get hit by a train, die and go to hell! Why end the ride that way?

to:

* During the Headless Horseman song, Ichabod's got a pile of... pink mush on his plate. What was that suppose to be? Mashed potatoes? Hasty pudding?
** Its It's gelatin dessert. The story is set in 1790 and the dessert was around as early as 1747.
* More of a meta example, but ''why'' was "Mr. Toad's Wild Ride" so scary? There's no horror in the Wind in the Willows part of the movie - all NightmareFuel comes from the last 5 minutes or so of the Sleepy Hollow part. Toad most certainly doesn't get hit by a train, die and go to hell! Why end the ride that way?



** He swapped places with Cyril, who was wearing an identical costume. Never mind how the guards overlooked that "Granny Toad" had shrunken from horse-size to toad-size while visiting her "grandson", or how ''Cyril'' got out of the cell after Toad had left....
* In the court scene, with the conflicting testimony between Cyril and Mr. Winkie's events of the Car case, and with the court believing Mr. Winnkie's story, shouldn't Cyril have gotten in trouble for perjury?

to:

** He swapped places with Cyril, who was wearing an identical costume. Never mind how the guards overlooked that "Granny Toad" had shrunken from horse-size to toad-size while visiting her "grandson", or how ''Cyril'' got out of the cell after Toad had left....
left...
* In the court scene, with the conflicting testimony between Cyril and Mr. Winkie's events of the Car case, and with the court believing Mr. Winnkie's Winkie's story, shouldn't Cyril have gotten in trouble for perjury?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the court scene, with the conflicting testimony between Cyril and Mr. Winkie's events of the Car case, and with the court believing Mr. Winnkie's story, shouldn't Cyril have gotten in trouble for perjury?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** He swapped places with Cyril, who was wearing an identical costume. Never mind how the guards overlooked that "Granny Toad" had shrunken from horse-size to toad-size, or how ''Cyril'' got out of the cell after Toad had left....

to:

** He swapped places with Cyril, who was wearing an identical costume. Never mind how the guards overlooked that "Granny Toad" had shrunken from horse-size to toad-size, toad-size while visiting her "grandson", or how ''Cyril'' got out of the cell after Toad had left....
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** He swapped places with Cyril, who was wearing an identical costume. Never mind how the guards overlooked that "Granny Toad" had shrunken from horse-size to toad-size, or how ''Cyril'' got out of the cell after Toad had left....
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Anybody notice that, for all the talk about Disneyfication, their version of ''Literature/TheLegendOfSleepyHollow'' is more true to the book than the Tim Burton version?
** That's because Burton's version was a loose retelling and not the actual story, much like how his ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' wasn't meant to be an exact retelling of those books. Hence why his movie is titled just ''Film/SleepyHollow'' instead of the book's (and Disney's) title ''The Legend of Sleepy Hollow''.

to:

* Anybody notice that, for all the talk about Disneyfication, their version of ''Literature/TheLegendOfSleepyHollow'' is more true to the book than the Tim Burton Creator/TimBurton version?
** That's because Burton's version was a loose retelling and not the actual story, much like how his ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' wasn't meant to be an exact retelling of those books. Hence why his movie is titled just ''Film/SleepyHollow'' ''Film/SleepyHollow1999'' instead of the book's (and Disney's) title ''The Legend of Sleepy Hollow''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* More of a meta example, but ''why'' was "Mr. Toad's Wild Ride" so scary? There's no horror in the Wind in the Willows part of the movie - all NightmareFuel comes from the last 5 minutes or so of the Sleepy Hollow part.

to:

* More of a meta example, but ''why'' was "Mr. Toad's Wild Ride" so scary? There's no horror in the Wind in the Willows part of the movie - all NightmareFuel comes from the last 5 minutes or so of the Sleepy Hollow part. Toad most certainly doesn't get hit by a train, die and go to hell! Why end the ride that way?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Why did the barkeeper character lie on the witness stand about the contract? He could only lose by that. If he'd told the truth, Toad would have been exonerated for the theft charge, but barkeeper would have had full legal right to Toad Hall - it was a binding contract - so he would have come out on top. Instead, by lying he put himself in a lose-lose-situation: he'd denied the existence of the contract on the stand, so his inhabiting Toad Hall would eventually exonerate Toad, and make Toad get back Toad Hall.

to:

* Why did the barkeeper character lie on the witness stand about the contract? He could only lose by that. If he'd told the truth, Toad would have been exonerated for the theft charge, but the barkeeper would have had full legal right to Toad Hall - it was a binding contract - so he would have come out on top. Instead, by lying he put himself in a lose-lose-situation: he'd denied the existence of the contract on the stand, so his inhabiting Toad Hall would eventually exonerate Toad, and make Toad get back Toad Hall.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Because ''he'' was the real motor-car thief, and Toad was the perfect fall guy for the crime. Everyone was aware of Toad's borderline-insane obsession with motor cars, and had reason to believe he'd get one at any cost, even if it was theft. Thus, Winkie would be free of all accusations.


Added DiffLines:

** In the original book (and early versions of the film) the jailer thought he was a washer woman visiting the jail.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** That's because Burton's version was a loose retelling and not the actual story, much like how his ''Film/AliceInWonderland'' wasn't meant to be an exact retelling of those books. Hence why his movie is titled just ''Film/SleepyHollow'' instead of the book's (and Disney's) title ''The Legend of Sleepy Hollow''.

to:

** That's because Burton's version was a loose retelling and not the actual story, much like how his ''Film/AliceInWonderland'' ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010'' wasn't meant to be an exact retelling of those books. Hence why his movie is titled just ''Film/SleepyHollow'' instead of the book's (and Disney's) title ''The Legend of Sleepy Hollow''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Why did the barkeeper character lie on the witness stand about the contract? He could only lose by that. If he'd told the truth, Toad would have been exonerated for the theft charge, but barkeeper would have had full legal right to Toad Hall - it was a binding contract - so he would have come out on top. Instead, by lying he put himself in a lose-lose-situation: he'd denied the existence of the contract on the stand, so his inhabiting Toad Hall would eventually exonerate Toad, and make Toad get back Toad Hall.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Its gelatin dessert. The story is set in 1790 and the dessert was around as early as 1747.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Conjugal visit?

to:

** Conjugal Maybe the prison guards thought it was a conjugal visit?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Conjugal visit?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* More of a meta example, but ''why'' was "Mr. Toad's Wild Ride" so scary? There's no horror in the Wind in the Willows part of the movie - all NightmareFuel comes from the last 5 minutes or so of the Sleepy Hollow part.
* Also, just how DID Toad manage to get out of his cell unnoticed? Yes, he's DisguisedInDrag, but unlike the book, there's no reason for a woman to be hanging around a prison cell.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* During the Headless Horseman song, Ichabod's got a pile of...pink mush on his plate. What was that suppose to be? Mashed potatoes? Hasty pudding?

Added: 4

Changed: 11

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Tweak~


* Anybody notice that, for all the talk about Disneyfication, their version of ''TheLegendOfSleepyHollow'' is more true to the book than the Tim Burton version?

to:

* Anybody notice that, for all the talk about Disneyfication, their version of ''TheLegendOfSleepyHollow'' ''Literature/TheLegendOfSleepyHollow'' is more true to the book than the Tim Burton version?



** At the same time, it's a simple tale anyways, making this into a Feature Length movie would take a ''lot'' of AdaptationExpansion.

to:

** At the same time, it's a simple tale anyways, making this into a Feature Length movie would take a ''lot'' of AdaptationExpansion.AdaptationExpansion.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** At the same time, it's a simple tale anyways, making this into a Feature Length movie would take a ''lot'' of AdaptationExpansion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Anybody notice that, for all the talk about Disneyfication, their version of ''Sleepy Hollow'' is more true to the book than the Tim Burton version?
** That's because Burton's version was a loose retelling and not the actual story, much like how his ''AliceInWonderland'' wasn't meant to be an exact retelling of those books. Hence why his movie is titled just ''Sleepy Hollow'' instead of the book's (and Disney's) title ''TheLegendOfSleepyHollow''.

to:

* Anybody notice that, for all the talk about Disneyfication, their version of ''Sleepy Hollow'' ''TheLegendOfSleepyHollow'' is more true to the book than the Tim Burton version?
** That's because Burton's version was a loose retelling and not the actual story, much like how his ''AliceInWonderland'' ''Film/AliceInWonderland'' wasn't meant to be an exact retelling of those books. Hence why his movie is titled just ''Sleepy Hollow'' ''Film/SleepyHollow'' instead of the book's (and Disney's) title ''TheLegendOfSleepyHollow''.''The Legend of Sleepy Hollow''.

Top