History Headscratchers / LittleShopOfHorrors

25th Mar '16 12:05:26 PM AlinhoAlisson
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* OK, so Audrey II is dead, Seymour and Audrey move into the suburbs and everything is nice and dandy... But what happened to all the contracts Seymour signed about the plant? If [[RealityEnsues reality ensued]], he'd be sued to his last cent for breach of contract, lose all the money and they'd have to move back to a CrapsackWorld like Skid Row.
17th Feb '16 6:39:19 PM Blackjack254
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** Also, the original ending isn't really faithful to the play, in that it's not really meant to be played seriously in the play as it is here. In the play, Seymour, Audrey, and Mushnik appear as buds and sing "Don't feed the Plants", for example.
21st Nov '15 4:09:58 PM rememberthehood1941
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** It makes more sense for the way Seymour is portrayed in the movie vs the play. In the movie, Seymour doesn't have much time to think about what's going on when he kills both Orin and Mushnik. Plus, they BOTH were portrayed as terrible people in the movie, what with Mushnik blackmailing Seymour into giving him the plant. If Seymour had let him live, things could have been even worse. In the play,however, Seymour thinks about it and makes a decision before killing both of them. There's an entire song where the Orin is begging for his life, and if you take the jokes out of it, it really is horrifying. Then there's no blackmail in the play. Mushnik is just doing his civic duty and keeping a probable murderer off the streets, and more importantly, out of his shop. Does he have ulterior motives? Sure, maybe, depending on how it's played. But it's still not likely that Seymour understands that intention. In fact, one could argue that Mushnik is the only male character who could ever be considered as a decent human being. After all, he took Seymour out of the orphanage and gave him a place to stay, even after he turned out to be a useless lump of a person. Despite him getting frustrated with them sometimes, he really did care for his employees and tried to help them whenever he could, so long as it didn't cost him anything. In spite of all he owes Mushnik, and the fact that Mushnik had done nothing wrong, Seymour stone cold killed the guy by tricking him into the plant. In the movie it looked almost like Seymour tried to stop him from going into the plant. The movie tried too hard to have Seymour be sympathetic and ended up changing the character to the point where he didn't deserve to die. After all, what did he do wrong? In the play, the only way for Seymour to atone for his sins is to sacrifice himself in an attempt to reverse his mistakes.

to:

** It makes more sense for the way Seymour is portrayed in the movie vs the play. In the movie, Seymour doesn't have much time to think about what's going on when he kills both Orin and Mushnik. Plus, they BOTH were portrayed as terrible people in the movie, what with Mushnik blackmailing Seymour into giving him the plant. If Seymour had let him live, things could have been even worse. In the play,however, Seymour thinks about it and makes a decision before killing both of them. There's an entire song where the Orin is begging for his life, and if you take the jokes out of it, it really is horrifying. Then there's no blackmail in the play. Mushnik is just doing his civic duty and keeping a probable murderer off the streets, and more importantly, out of his shop. Does he have ulterior motives? Sure, maybe, depending on how it's played. But it's still not likely that Seymour understands that intention. In fact, one could argue that Mushnik is the only male character who could ever be considered as a decent human being. After all, he took Seymour out of the orphanage and gave him a place to stay, even after he turned out to be a useless lump of a person.person AND he's the first person to tell Audrey that Orin is bad news. Despite him getting frustrated with them sometimes, he really did care for his employees and tried to help them whenever he could, so long as it didn't cost him anything. In spite of all he owes Mushnik, and the fact that Mushnik had done nothing wrong, Seymour stone cold killed the guy by tricking him into the plant. In the movie it looked almost like Seymour tried to stop him from going into the plant. The movie tried too hard to have Seymour be sympathetic and ended up changing the character to the point where he didn't deserve to die. After all, what did he do wrong? In the play, the only way for Seymour to atone for his sins is to sacrifice himself in an attempt to reverse his mistakes.


Added DiffLines:

*** The film's version was shown using a telephone to lure Audrey to the shop. Wouldn't be a complete stretch to [[FridgeBrilliance calling Dr. Martin impersonating Seymour to get him to talk about the deal in the original ending]].
6th Nov '15 1:13:20 AM PurpleAlert
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** Hiring competent workers for an all-day job, assuming that the plumbing changes is just fixing leaks or replacing individual pipes and not refitting the entire building. A refrigerated display just means plugging in a cooler in front of the shop windows, retiling crappy linoleum is easy because in a dump like that, it's probably just stick-ons or cheap laminate instead of actual ceramic, and painting with a proper crew doesn't take more than a few hours.
6th Nov '15 1:06:45 AM PurpleAlert
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** The steps lead out to the same alleyway that Seymour used to drag Orrin's body back to the shop, where Mushnik saw him. Granted it would have been the ''smarter'' thing to do, to avoid having to cross Audrey II's path, but Seymour's a coward fleeing the scene of (at this point) several crimes. It mattered more to him to keep up appearances (dressing nicely to leave the store through the front, as opposed to sneaking around in a suit and leaving through a gross alley) and avoid suspicion. Keep in mind, he's not actually ''afraid'' of Audrey II yet, because he thinks Audrey II still depends on him for food and, perfectly in character, all he thinks he needs to do to kill it is to do nothing at all.
23rd Mar '15 3:45:25 PM johabi
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** It's almost like Seymour struggles with low self image and doesn't think he's worth anything without his plant. And in the play, that's exactly what he decides anyway. As soon as he finds out that Audrey would still love him without the plant, he sets his mind on killing the plant right after Life Magazine takes the picture, taking the TV job, and moving far away with Audrey. That's not really a great plan in and of itself either, but he's under a lot of pressure, probably sleep deprived, not thinking straight, and not a very smart guy to begin with.
23rd Mar '15 3:33:00 PM johabi
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** It makes more sense for the way Seymour is portrayed in the movie vs the play. In the movie, Seymour doesn't have much time to think about what's going on when he kills both Orin and Mushnik. Plus, they BOTH were portrayed as terrible people in the movie, what with Mushnik blackmailing Seymour into giving him the plant. If Seymour had let him live, things could have been even worse. In the play,however, Seymour thinks about it and makes a decision before killing both of them. There's an entire song where the Orin is begging for his life, and if you take the jokes out of it, it really is horrifying. Then there's no blackmail in the play. Mushnik is just doing his civic duty and keeping a probable murderer off the streets, and more importantly, out of his shop. Does he have ulterior motives? Sure, maybe, depending on how it's played. But it's still not likely that Seymour understands that intention. In fact, one could argue that Mushnik is the only male character who could ever be considered as a decent human being. After all, he took Seymour out of the orphanage and gave him a place to stay, even after he turned out to be a useless lump of a person. Despite him getting frustrated with them sometimes, he really did care for his employees and tried to help them whenever he could, so long as it didn't cost him anything. In spite of all he owes Mushnik, and the fact that Mushnik had done nothing wrong, Seymour stone cold killed the guy by tricking him into the plant. In the movie it looked almost like Seymour tried to stop him from going into the plant. The movie tried too hard to have Seymour be sympathetic and ended up changing the character to the point where he didn't deserve to die. After all, what did he do wrong? In the play, the only way for Seymour to atone for his sins is to sacrifice himself in an attempt to reverse his mistakes.
11th Jan '15 9:47:40 PM Nymris
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

***Actually people did notice. At the beginning of the movie Mushnik is reading a newspaper with its headline about the mysterious eclipse.
23rd Dec '14 3:58:50 PM TheUnknownUploader
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** [[HoistByHisOwnPetard Seymour wouldn't have found the wire if Audrey II hadn't knocked the whole building down.]] It's still a DeusExmachina though; just one Audrey II caused.

to:

*** [[HoistByHisOwnPetard Seymour wouldn't have found the wire if Audrey II hadn't knocked the whole building down.]] It's still a DeusExmachina DeusExMachina though; just one Audrey II caused.
23rd Dec '14 3:58:15 PM TheUnknownUploader
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** [[HoistByHisOwnPetard Seymour wouldn't have found the wire if Audrey II hadn't knocked the whole building down.]] It's still a DeusExmachina though; just one Audrey II caused.




to:

** Rational thinking is hard to do when you've committed murder thanks to a giant man-eating plant.


Added DiffLines:

** Yeah, it would've been better if they played "Don't Feed The Plants" when we see the little Audrey II. Not great, but better.


Added DiffLines:

** "Excuse me. I'm just bringing this bag of compost to the plant shop."
This list shows the last 10 events of 74. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Headscratchers.LittleShopOfHorrors