Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / LastActionHero

Go To

OR

Added: 481

Changed: 287

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Benedict's plans in the movie and plans after learning he's a fictional villain in a world where the bad guys can when seem entirely different. He likely at that point has no real 'plan' in a conventional sense, and more wanting to just cause chaos and destruction because he ''can''.


Added DiffLines:

** If Death is any indication, then they'd all retain their powers, just not the rules their world runs on. So Freddy would still be able to use his dream murder powers, but the 'movie law' of the 'FinalGirl' wouldn't grant the last surviving girl in a group of friends PlotArmor and the ability to beat him. This is also the reason he primarily picks horror movie villains: they tend to have more superhuman powers whereas he and Jack are just normal humans with incredible skill.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's possibly a setup to an even darker sequel where Jack goes off the rail after the death of his son, but negative reaction to this shift in tone forces the studio to lighten up in the next film. This would probably explain why they have to kill off his second cousin in that film, because they have to scrap their original DarkerAndEdgier treatment and there isn't anytime left to come up with anything better.

to:

** It's possibly a setup to an even darker sequel where Jack goes off the rail after the death of his son, but negative reaction to this shift in tone forces the studio to lighten up in the next film. This would probably explain why they have to kill off his second cousin in that film, because they have to scrap their original DarkerAndEdgier treatment and there isn't anytime left to come up with anything better.
better. This is supported by Arnold having to mention how much less carnage there is in the fourth movie as opposed to the third.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's possibly a setup to an even darker sequel where Jack goes off the rail after the death of his son, but negative reaction to this shift in tone forces the studio to lighten up in the fourth film. This would probably explain why they have to kill off his second cousin in that film, because they have to scrap their original DarkerAndEdgier treatment and there isn't anytime left to come up with anything better.

to:

** It's possibly a setup to an even darker sequel where Jack goes off the rail after the death of his son, but negative reaction to this shift in tone forces the studio to lighten up in the fourth next film. This would probably explain why they have to kill off his second cousin in that film, because they have to scrap their original DarkerAndEdgier treatment and there isn't anytime left to come up with anything better.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's possibly a setup to an even darker sequel where Jack goes off the rail after the death of his son, but negative reaction to this shift in tone forces the studio to lighten it up for the fourth film. This would probably explain why they have to kill off his second cousin in that film, because they have to scrap their original DarkerAndEdgier treatment and there isn't anytime left to come up with anything better.

to:

** It's possibly a setup to an even darker sequel where Jack goes off the rail after the death of his son, but negative reaction to this shift in tone forces the studio to lighten it up for in the fourth film. This would probably explain why they have to kill off his second cousin in that film, because they have to scrap their original DarkerAndEdgier treatment and there isn't anytime left to come up with anything better.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's possibly a setup to an even darker sequel where Jack goes off the rail after the death of his son, but negative reaction to this shift in tone forces the studio to lighten it up for the fourth film. This would probably explain why they have to kill off his second cousin in that film, because they have to scrap their original DarkerAndEdgier treatment.

to:

** It's possibly a setup to an even darker sequel where Jack goes off the rail after the death of his son, but negative reaction to this shift in tone forces the studio to lighten it up for the fourth film. This would probably explain why they have to kill off his second cousin in that film, because they have to scrap their original DarkerAndEdgier treatment.
treatment and there isn't anytime left to come up with anything better.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** It's possibly a setup to an even darker sequel where Jack goes off the rail after the death of his son, but negative reaction to this shift in tone forces the studio to lighten it up for the fourth film. This would probably explain why they have to kill off his second cousin in that film, because they have to scrap their original DarkerAndEdgier treatment.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** She does, actually. She's in the middle of commenting about Jack's resemblance to Arnold when Danny butts in.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** This is supported by the movie too, as Benedict explicitly says that if [[AGodAmI God was a villain, he would be him]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Another factor for this idea really depends on whether or not it's affecting all of the film's copies. For all we know, the actions taken by Danny affected only the copy of the film he entered into using the ticket. We don't see anyone at the Jack Slater 5 premiere that looks like Danny and that is an actor. So, that would indicate that the only copy that got affected with the one Danny interacted with.

to:

** Another factor for this idea really depends on whether or not it's affecting all of the film's copies. For all we know, the actions taken by Danny affected only the copy of the film he entered into using the ticket. We don't see anyone at the Jack ''Jack Slater 5 IV'' premiere that looks like Danny and that is an actor. So, that would indicate that the only copy that got affected with the one Danny interacted with.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Another factor for this idea really depends on whether or not it's affecting all of the film's copies. For all we know, the actions taken by Danny affected only the copy of the film he entered into using the ticket. We don't see anyone at the Jack Slater 5 premiere that looks like Danny and that is an actor. So, that would indicate that the only copy that got affected with the one Danny interacted with.
*** Another thing that should be taken into account with the above is this: will the changes made by Danny stick? As long as the film is going, the world of the film with the changes made continues to exist. However, what happens if the end credits roll? What if you start the film from the beginning and watch it, this time without the ticket? Would Danny turn up again in the film or would that copy of reset? For all we know, the moment the film reaches it's end credits, it'll reset back to the original version of the story and Danny wouldn't be shown, and such changes wouldn't exist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Yes, you would. What people miss about Reality TV is that it's not a 1:1 representation. Yes, an event with people can be filmed, but more often than not, a lot of the story and conflict presented in a show is done through editing in order to make it interesting to viewers. Essentially, Reality TV isn't reality as it is, just a version of reality that is a lot more entertaining. The only difference is that the performers aren't actors. So, what's presented would be just as much fictional as anything that is straight up fictional.




to:

** According to what's presented, yes, Iron Man's suit would still work, but it would be for a limited time (much like Jack's ability to punch through a glass window without any pain). Death's abilities do work since he's fresh from the screen, but the longer that he stays in our reality he will lose those abilities much like how Jack's ability to shrug off injures would. The same is true of any of the supernatural villains that Benedict mentioned he could bring into our reality. Since our reality doesn't have supernatural, they'd eventually lose those abilities while being in our reality.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** I think a better question would be why doesn't she notice/comment on him looking excactly like movie star Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Added: 305

Changed: 8

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The logic is probably a combination of LikeRealityUnlessNoted and RuleOfConservationOfDetail: everything not relevant to the plot still exists, but in a low-detail version that only becomes filled in once the characters visit.

to:

** The logic is probably a combination of LikeRealityUnlessNoted and RuleOfConservationOfDetail: TheLawOfConservationOfDetail: everything not relevant to the plot still exists, but in a low-detail version that only becomes filled in once the characters visit.visit.
*** That, and it's implied by the various character cameos (like the T-1000 and Whiskers, assuming he's not from an [[AnimatedAdaptation animated spinoff]] or something) that if a movie ''can'' feasibly share a universe with another one or at least doesn't drastically contradict anything, it likely does.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Whiskers *did* appear in Jack Slater IV as it was originally made... as a FreezeFrameBonus EasterEgg.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Meta headscratchers aren't allowed anymore


[[folder:Title of the Film]]
* ''Why'' is this movie called The ''Last'' Action Hero? If it were established that, in universe, the whole action movie genre is considered 'tired' or 'old hat' and that the Jack Slater movies are the action movie genre's last gasp, then it'd make sense.
** Another way the title would make sense is if Benedict were to go on a magic ticket-assisted killing spree during his time in 'the real world', summoning CaptainErsatz versions of action heroes to 'the real world' for the sole purpose of killing them instantly. By the time Slater and Daniel catch up to him, he's killed every other action hero in every movie copy in New York ... making Slater the last action hero. But we don't get either of these justifications for the title, and in fact no justification at all. There's no reason why we should consider Slater (or anyone else) the last action hero.
** One possible reason is the Reverse TitleDrop. As the class watches ''Hamlet'', Laurence Olivier's role is described as "the first action hero". (By his widow, no less.) That and the implication at the end that Jack Slater gives up on action movie heroics, quits his job and drives off into the sunset... in film canon. Not really a logical explanation, but it tried.
** It might also be poking fun at the sometimes inaccurate/overly dramatic aspects (like the title) of the action genre. Rather like the rest of the film.
** If you change the definition of "last" here from "final" to "most recent" ("Remember the ''last'' time we (whatever)", it becomes a play on how very many action hero movies there are.
** Conversely, you could argue that Schwarzenegger is meant to be the ''ultimate'' Action Hero. As in, don't bother looking for anyone better. So "last" might fit in that sense.
** Danny plunged into the world of action heroes as an escape from the real world, quite likely as a response to his father's death. During the course of the film, he begins to connect with the real world again and understand the true nature of what action heroes are and what they can never be for you. Given that he recognized several action hero references throughout the film, including the T-1000, that would make Jack Slater the last of the many iconic action heroes that he idolized during his escape from reality.
[[/folder]]



[[folder:Reactions to the movie]]
A meta one: Why is this movie so ill-recieved?
* People assumed it was an ordinary Schwarzenegger film rather than a parody. Also, ''Film/JurassicPark'' airing just a week before caused it to be overshadowed. That said, the movie had a little too much mood whiplash and couldn't decide on whether it should be a serious movie or a comedy movie.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
TRS cleanup


* Movie/genre rules. The hero (usually) can't be killed, villains can return even from apparent death IF lazy sequels demand it, but friendly side characters StuffedIntoTheFridge are generally gone forever.

to:

* Movie/genre rules. The hero (usually) can't be killed, villains can return even from apparent death IF lazy sequels demand it, but friendly side characters StuffedIntoTheFridge killed are generally gone forever.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Before Giuliani cleaned up New York, this was the stereotypical view -- that New York was a [[WretchedHive hideously decrepit and violent place]], and people generally [[BystanderSyndrome kept their heads down and minded their own business]] when they weren't being rude. Now that things have gotten a bit better, the stereotype has moved on to Detroit.

to:

** Before Giuliani cleaned up New York, [[TheBigRottenApple this was the stereotypical view view]] -- that New York was a [[WretchedHive hideously decrepit and violent place]], and people generally [[BystanderSyndrome kept their heads down and minded their own business]] when they weren't being rude. Now that things have gotten a bit better, the stereotype has moved on to Detroit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** While rare, I can think of a few action movies whose closing scenes involve the death of someone close to the hero.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The implication is that a ''lot'' of movies take place in this alternate universe, not just Jack Slater flicks (hence Sharon Stone's character from ''Film/BasicInstinct'' walking out of the police station). This includes a ''Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit'' knockoff with a cartoon police cat. Most likely, the cat doesn't actually appear in any Jack Slater movies; it's only shown to us because Danny spots it and points it out. Had ''Jack Slater IV'' played out normally, without a real world kid falling into it, presumably Jack would have continued on to his captain's office without giving the cat a glance, and so neither would the camera. (True, the cat shows up in a plot important role later, but only after Danny has caused things to go wildly off-script.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Andy]]
Isn't it strange that Andy Slater is killed at the ''end'' of the third movie? It isn't the death itself that's the problem, but its placement within the film; a big, shocking death like that is usually done near the beginning or about halfway through to emphasize the stakes and/or show the villain's evilness; ideally, ''if'' he was going to get killed, Andy should've died at the beginning of the movie or halfway through it, to give Jack personal motivation to get the Ripper. Tellingly, regardless of its placement in the movie-within-the-movie, Andy's death happens (for us) at the beginning (teased) and later the middle (shown in full) of ''Last Action Hero'' itself. It makes no narrative sense to come at the end of the film except for pure shock value.

to:

[[folder:Andy]]
[[folder:Andy's Death]]
Isn't it strange that Andy Slater is killed at the ''end'' of the third movie? It isn't the death itself that's the problem, but its placement within the film; a big, shocking death like that is usually done near the beginning or about halfway through to emphasize the stakes and/or show the villain's evilness; ideally, ''if'' he was going to get killed, Andy should've died at the beginning of the movie or halfway through it, to give Jack personal motivation to get the Ripper. Tellingly, regardless of its placement in the movie-within-the-movie, Andy's death happens that way (for us) in ''Last Action Hero'' itself: at the beginning (teased) and later the middle (shown in full) of ''Last Action Hero'' itself. It makes no narrative sense to come at the end of the film except for pure shock value.
full).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** There's plenty of real life swimming pool/bar combos like that.


Added DiffLines:

** Because Jack explains he's a cop who found Danny at the theater and brought him home. This is discussed when they eat breakfast.

Top