History Headscratchers / EternalSunshineOfTheSpotlessMind

23rd Jun '17 4:13:58 PM fearlessnikki
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** It makes more sense that the person being erased doesn't get such a card. If they knew they'd been erased, they might get more persistent trying to get the other person to remember them. Notice that Joel just assumes Clementine is pretending she doesn't know him until he sees the card.



** They do mention that it works like dreams, when you only forget once you've waken up. As I understood it, there's "subconcious" Joel, who can remeber just fine, and the "awake" Joel who won't be able to recall those memories.

to:

** They do mention that it works like dreams, when you only forget once you've waken up. As I understood it, there's "subconcious" "subconscious" Joel, who can remeber remember just fine, and the "awake" Joel who won't be able to recall those memories.memories.
** This is confirmed by the fact that Joel is actively trying to prevent his memories from being erased while he's 'under'. As the memory of going to his appointment is one of the first ones we see get erased. It's also probably why Joel has to be unconscious for the whole procedure.
14th Feb '17 3:59:21 PM NebulousCingulatan
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* If everybody that could remind the person of the relationship they had erased got a card telling them not to talk about it, why wouldn't Joel get one when Clementine erased him? He even did the thing they try to prevent in sending the card; going to the person and trying to interact with them because of memories they no longer have. The Doctor even said, "I'm sorry, you weren't supposed to see this." as if it wan't a mistake he didn't get one.
--
7th Sep '16 8:49:57 AM aft85
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

**** There's no way more than a dozen people are intimately involved in your life though.
7th Sep '16 8:45:53 AM aft85
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** In reality, such a procedure would have so many ethical issues involved that there's no way it would be possible to use for blocking memories of ex girlfriends or such. (The only plausible medical use would be treatments for mental health issues like PTSD, but even then, that might cause subconscious problems).
24th May '16 6:40:11 PM Nylsa
Is there an issue? Send a Message


<<|ItJustBugsMe|>>
11th Feb '16 8:35:41 PM Sarah1281
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** We already saw what happened when a person who can't remember meets someone who brings up the previous relationship. Joel was confused and disturbed by Patrick demanding to know what he was doing there and Clementine (after she had heard the truth) was wary when that one guy knew her at Joel's apartment.
1st Jul '15 3:05:24 PM Mersadeon
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** That's because you can't learn from mistakes you can't remember. Of course Mary falls for the Doctor again - since she can't remember that it already happened, nothing is stopping her from falling for him again.
27th Dec '14 9:56:24 PM morenaxo
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* There's an obvious paradox overhanging the entire plot of the film. In the later parts of the film when Joel remembers his earliest memories of Clementine, he still remembers having hired Lacuna to erase his memories of their relationship, despite at this point his memories of Lacuna and his breakup with Clementine already having been erased. This probably falls under AcceptableBreaksFromReality and AnthropicPrinciple, however, as the plot of the film would be completely impossible if this wasn't the case.

to:

* There's an obvious paradox overhanging the entire plot of the film. In the later parts of the film when Joel remembers his earliest memories of Clementine, he still remembers having hired Lacuna to erase his memories of their relationship, despite at this point his memories of Lacuna and his breakup with Clementine already having been erased. This probably falls under AcceptableBreaksFromReality and AnthropicPrinciple, however, as the plot of the film would be completely impossible if this wasn't the case.case.
** They do mention that it works like dreams, when you only forget once you've waken up. As I understood it, there's "subconcious" Joel, who can remeber just fine, and the "awake" Joel who won't be able to recall those memories.
6th Aug '14 4:37:16 AM Folamh3
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** The way I think it seems to work is that ''any'' memories that could be associated with Clementine herself are erased. But they can't be erased for good. The process seems to suppress the memories so that Joel will never think of them - like how we've all forgotten insignificant things but we remember what's important to us. Howard makes those memories 'insignificant' in Joel's mind. But they can still be triggered. Patrick's using Joel's stuff to seduce Clementine does jog her memories a little. Generally in life all we need is one small thing to remind us...and we'll eventually remember something we've forgotten.

to:

** The way I think it seems to work is that ''any'' memories that could be associated with Clementine herself are erased. But they can't be erased for good. The process seems to suppress the memories so that Joel will never think of them - like how we've all forgotten insignificant things but we remember what's important to us. Howard makes those memories 'insignificant' in Joel's mind. But they can still be triggered. Patrick's using Joel's stuff to seduce Clementine does jog her memories a little. Generally in life all we need is one small thing to remind us...and we'll eventually remember something we've forgotten.forgotten.
----
* There's an obvious paradox overhanging the entire plot of the film. In the later parts of the film when Joel remembers his earliest memories of Clementine, he still remembers having hired Lacuna to erase his memories of their relationship, despite at this point his memories of Lacuna and his breakup with Clementine already having been erased. This probably falls under AcceptableBreaksFromReality and AnthropicPrinciple, however, as the plot of the film would be completely impossible if this wasn't the case.
9th May '14 9:36:31 PM arcana07
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** Well, in 2004 there was Friendster, which IIRC was the original "social network". But back when I was on Friendster it was far more common to have something like 50 "friends" in your network than the 500 - 1,000 that one sees a lot on Facebook. A lot fewer people were on Friendster as it was predominantly people who were in my age range, those who were either college students or young adults in their early 20s (which I was). The oldest people you'd commonly encounter were those in their 30s.
This list shows the last 10 events of 24. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Headscratchers.EternalSunshineOfTheSpotlessMind