Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / CorpseBride

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Not to mention that detective work and forensic science (or lack thereof) were incredibly limited back then. So murder and various other kinds of crimes were much easier to get away with. Meaning a lot of murders went unsolved ([[UsefulNotes Jack The Ripper]] being the biggest example of this).

to:

** Not to mention that detective work and forensic science (or lack thereof) were incredibly limited back then. So murder and various other kinds of crimes were much easier to get away with. Meaning a lot of murders went unsolved ([[UsefulNotes Jack The Ripper]] (UsefulNotes/JackTheRipper being the biggest example of this).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** From what it looks like, they're [[en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenant revants]] of some kind, so they ain't 100% zombie nor are they 100% ghost, either. What suggests this is the fact that, when Emily's ghostly goals (or whatever her equivalent is) are fullfilled, she moves on to another form of afterlife, so she no longer has a body. 

to:

** From what it looks like, they're [[en.[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenant revants]] revenants]] of some kind, so they ain't 100% zombie nor are they 100% ghost, either. What suggests this is the fact that, when Emily's ghostly goals (or whatever her equivalent is) are fullfilled, she moves on to another form of afterlife, so she no longer has a body. 

Added: 780

Changed: 780

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
That visual editor rendered things weird, so I had come back and fix 'em.


** They probably are not ghosts as ghosts would not be decomposing. It is kind of haunting that so many people apparently have issues and cannot rest in peace. They look fairly happy, though.** From what it looks like, they're [[en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenant revants]] of some kind, so they ain't 100% zombie nor are they 100% ghost, either. What suggests this is the fact that, when Emily's ghostly goals (or whatever her equivalent is) are fullfilled, she moves on to another form of afterlife, so she no longer has a body. 

to:

** They probably are not ghosts as ghosts would not be decomposing. It is kind of haunting that so many people apparently have issues and cannot rest in peace. They look fairly happy, though.though.
** From what it looks like, they're [[en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenant revants]] of some kind, so they ain't 100% zombie nor are they 100% ghost, either. What suggests this is the fact that, when Emily's ghostly goals (or whatever her equivalent is) are fullfilled, she moves on to another form of afterlife, so she no longer has a body. 



* Near the end of the film, it is said that the dead must not directly meddle in the affairs of the living, but beforehand, a whole army of the dead just show up and prank everyone living in the town like it's nobody's business? Also, Emily herself even raises a sword directly against her murderer to defend Victor? Actually, when you really think about it, Emily should not be able to drag Victor down to the underworld with her with that clause in mind?** ​From what I got out of it, the Dead can prank but ''not'' directly hurt or kill the Living while they are in the domain of the Living, however, Emily might be exception because Barkis is the one who killed her in the first place but, once Barkis drank that poison, he was fair game. As far as Victor entering the Underworld goes, well, he was, technically, engaged to Emily, it's just that it couldn't be official if dude didn't die (IIRC).

to:

* Near the end of the film, it is said that the dead must not directly meddle in the affairs of the living, but beforehand, a whole army of the dead just show up and prank everyone living in the town like it's nobody's business? Also, Emily herself even raises a sword directly against her murderer to defend Victor? Actually, when you really think about it, Emily should not be able to drag Victor down to the underworld with her with that clause in mind?** mind?
**
​From what I got out of it, the Dead can prank but ''not'' directly hurt or kill the Living while they are in the domain of the Living, however, Emily might be exception because Barkis is the one who killed her in the first place but, once Barkis drank that poison, he was fair game. As far as Victor entering the Underworld goes, well, he was, technically, engaged to Emily, it's just that it couldn't be official if dude didn't die (IIRC).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** They probably are not ghosts as ghosts would not be decomposing. It is kind of haunting that so many people apparently have issues and cannot rest in peace. They look fairly happy, though.

to:

** They probably are not ghosts as ghosts would not be decomposing. It is kind of haunting that so many people apparently have issues and cannot rest in peace. They look fairly happy, though.** From what it looks like, they're [[en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenant revants]] of some kind, so they ain't 100% zombie nor are they 100% ghost, either. What suggests this is the fact that, when Emily's ghostly goals (or whatever her equivalent is) are fullfilled, she moves on to another form of afterlife, so she no longer has a body. 



* Near the end of the film, it is said that the dead must not directly meddle in the affairs of the living, but beforehand, a whole army of the dead just show up and prank everyone living in the town like it's nobody's business? Also, Emily herself even raises a sword directly against her murderer to defend Victor? Actually, when you really think about it, Emily should not be able to drag Victor down to the underworld with her with that clause in mind?

to:

* Near the end of the film, it is said that the dead must not directly meddle in the affairs of the living, but beforehand, a whole army of the dead just show up and prank everyone living in the town like it's nobody's business? Also, Emily herself even raises a sword directly against her murderer to defend Victor? Actually, when you really think about it, Emily should not be able to drag Victor down to the underworld with her with that clause in mind?mind?** ​From what I got out of it, the Dead can prank but ''not'' directly hurt or kill the Living while they are in the domain of the Living, however, Emily might be exception because Barkis is the one who killed her in the first place but, once Barkis drank that poison, he was fair game. As far as Victor entering the Underworld goes, well, he was, technically, engaged to Emily, it's just that it couldn't be official if dude didn't die (IIRC).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A deleted scene explains that Emily's soul had seen Viktor in the forest many times over years, including walking and playing with Scraps, which is how she knows his name and his childhood pet.

to:

** A deleted scene explains that Emily's soul had seen Viktor Victor in the forest many times over years, including walking and playing with Scraps, which is how she knows his name and his childhood pet.



** To make a long story short it has to do with the way the aristocracy made money. Their main source of income was their estates (land-rich) and they made agricultural produce and sold it for money when the price of grain and other such produce rapidly dropped on account of America producing a shit ton of it. The aristocracy began to lose their source of income and had to turn to investment or marring into new money to keep their wealth and standing. That's probably why the Everglots have no money.

to:

** To make a long story short it has to do with the way the aristocracy made money. Their main source of income was their estates (land-rich) and they made agricultural produce and sold it for money when the price of grain and other such produce rapidly dropped on account of America producing a shit ton of it. The aristocracy began to lose their source of income and had to turn to investment or marring marrying into new money to keep their wealth and standing. That's probably why the Everglots have no money.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** to make a long story short it has to do with the way the aristacrcy made money. their main source of income was their estates (land-rich) and they made achricultural produce and sold it for money when the price of grain and other such produce rapitly dropped on account of America producing a shit ton of it the aristocracy began to lose their source of income and had to turn to investment or marring into new money to keep their wealth and standing. that's probably why the Everglots have no money.

to:

** to To make a long story short it has to do with the way the aristacrcy aristocracy made money. their Their main source of income was their estates (land-rich) and they made achricultural agricultural produce and sold it for money when the price of grain and other such produce rapitly rapidly dropped on account of America producing a shit ton of it the it. The aristocracy began to lose their source of income and had to turn to investment or marring into new money to keep their wealth and standing. that's That's probably why the Everglots have no money.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** to make a long story short it has to do with the way the aristacrcy made money. their main source of income was their estates (land-rich) and they made achricultural produce and sold it for money when the price of grain and other such produce rapitly dropped on account of America producing a shit ton of it the aristocracy began to lose their source of income and had to turn to investment or marring into new money to keep their wealth and standing. that's probably why the Everglot's have no money.

to:

** to make a long story short it has to do with the way the aristacrcy made money. their main source of income was their estates (land-rich) and they made achricultural produce and sold it for money when the price of grain and other such produce rapitly dropped on account of America producing a shit ton of it the aristocracy began to lose their source of income and had to turn to investment or marring into new money to keep their wealth and standing. that's probably why the Everglot's Everglots have no money.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder: About the "no interference clause"]]
* Near the end of the film, it is said that the dead must not directly meddle in the affairs of the living, but beforehand, a whole army of the dead just show up and prank everyone living in the town like it's nobody's business? Also, Emily herself even raises a sword directly against her murderer to defend Victor? Actually, when you really think about it, Emily should not be able to drag Victor down to the underworld with her with that clause in mind?
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** to make a long story short it has to do with the way the aristacrcy made money. their main source of income was their estates (land-rich) and they made achricultural produce and sold it for money when the price of grain and other such produce rapitly dropped on account of America producing a shit ton of it the aristocracy began to lose their source of income and had to turn to investment or marring into new money to keep their wealth and standing. that's probably why the Everglot's have no money.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Both of the above points are true and would probably take care of the matter easily. However, if for some reason that isn't enough, there is a fallback: Victoria can simply have the marriage annulled. The dead rose up in the middle of the wedding dinner right after the ceremony and Barkis "vanished" around the same time, so it would be easy for her to petition for an annulment on the grounds of non-consummation. Then, from a legal standpoint, her marriage to Barkis never happened and she would be free to marry Victor.

to:

** Both of the above points are true and would probably take care of the matter easily. However, if for some reason that isn't enough, there is a fallback: Victoria can simply have the marriage annulled. The dead rose up in the middle of the wedding dinner right after the ceremony and Barkis "vanished" around the same time, so it would be easy for her to petition for an annulment on the grounds of non-consummation. Then, from a legal standpoint, her marriage to Barkis never happened and she would be free to marry Victor. also at the film is set a marriage was not legal until the... consumation happens. that means that even if no one believes that Barkis is dead Victoria would have grounds for annulment anyway and so it would not matter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The Van Dorts weren't marrying for money - they were marrying for title and prestige. This was very common during the Victorian era when the concentration of wealth shifted from agricultural produce to industrial production; the aristocracy went bankrupt while merchants took their place, and the intermarrying of families weakened the ranks of the aristocracy by the 20th century.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** A deleted scene explains that Emily's soul had seen Viktor in the forest many times over years, including walking and playing with Scraps, which is how she knows his name and his childhood pet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, the Everglots are "land-rich" like most aristocracy. They could be getting rent on the properties, but any money could be immediately being spent on expenses so that they have nothing left over.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:

** Sometimes companies just do really well. Everyone needs to eat, and one of the Van Dorts may be a business/industry genius, or they simply happened to be entrenched in the seafood market and able to crush smaller competitors. As for the Everglots, the ImpoverishedPatrician who has huge amounts of land (and pedigree) but virtually no cash has been common enough during some parts of history to be a trope.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder: Mo Money, Mo Questions]]
* On a related note, does the movie ever explain where the Van Dorts got their newly acquired cash and where the Everglots' money went off to? Was there some kind of meat shortage that caused everyone to start buying more fish? Did the Everglots make some really bad investments? Is this some kind of sitcom scenario where the Van Dorts' wealth and the Everglots' lack thereof are one in the same, but the two parties are completely unaware of this fact? I realize that this is merely a [[TropesAreTools plot device]] to get Victor and Victoria into an arranged marriage, but with everything else in the story being so well thought out, the lack of explanation here is rather odd.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[/folders]]

to:

[[/folders]]
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** They were probably blind to everything but the possibility to marry into nobility. Plus, as you pointed out, they have no shortage of money. Barkis proposes to Victoria purely because he needs the money, which is why he's upset.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Not to mention that detective work and forensic science (or lack thereof) were incredibly limited back then. So murder and various other kinds of crimes were much easier to get away with. Meaning a lot of murders went unsolved ([[UsefulNotes Jack The Ripper]] being the biggest example of this).


Added DiffLines:


[[folder: The Dowry Issue]]
* When Victoria explains to Barkis that her family has no money left, and he wouldn't be getting her dowry, he gets upset. But what about the Van Dorts? Wouldn't they have gotten mad over not getting Victoria's dowry? Or would they have not cared because they were already rich from their fish business?
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[foldercontrol]]

Added: 1311

Changed: 492

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Ghosts or Zombies?]]



* Just before the ''Remains of the Day'' musical number, Victor asks "Who are you? Where am I?". Bonejangles answer with the story of Emily, which Victor didn't ask about, without even so much as, you know, basically telling him he's in the Underworld.

to:

[[/folder]]

[[folder:He Didn't Answer the Question]]
* Just before the ''Remains of the Day'' musical number, Victor asks asks, "Who are you? Where am I?". Bonejangles answer with the story of Emily, which Victor didn't ask about, without even so much as, you know, basically telling him he's in the Underworld.



[[/folder]]

[[folder:Ears are Necessary, but Not Vocal Chords?]]



[[/folder]]

[[folder:Is There a Heaven?]]



[[/folder]]

[[folder:What Happened to Barkis?]]



[[/folder]]

[[folder:Where's the Bouquet?]]



[[/folder]]

[[folder:Missing Parents]]



[[/folder]]

[[folder:Double-Dying]]



[[/folder]]

[[folder:Death Partners]]



[[/folders]]

[[folder:Not Being a Necrophiliac = Jerk?]]



[[/folder]]

[[folder:Why Attend the Wedding?]]



[[/folder]]

[[folder:Technically Bigamy]]



* When Victor messes up the wedding rehearsal, he accidentally sets Mrs. Everglot's dress on fire, resulting in everyone scrambling to put it out until Barkis finally does so... by pouring ''wine'' on it. Wouldn't that make the fire worse?

to:

[[/folder]]

[[folder:Flaming Stupid]]
* When Victor messes up the wedding rehearsal, he [[IgnorantAboutFire accidentally sets Mrs. Everglot's dress on fire, fire]], resulting in everyone scrambling to put it out until Barkis finally does so... by pouring ''wine'' on it. Wouldn't that make the fire worse?



[[/folder]]

[[folder:How are the Worlds Connected?]]



** It's possible that when Emily asks "Where are they buried?" it's just a more applicable means of saying "Where do they live?" since, as you've made note of, where people like Emily and Mayhew are buried (or in Mayhew's case, just where he died) determines where they end up in the Underworld. When she asked Victor that, she was only wondering what part of the land of the dead his parents had ended up in.

to:

** It's possible that when Emily asks "Where are they buried?" it's just a more applicable means of saying saying, "Where do they live?" since, as you've made note of, where people like Emily and Mayhew are buried (or in Mayhew's case, just where he died) determines where they end up in the Underworld. When she asked Victor that, she was only wondering what part of the land of the dead his parents had ended up in.in.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:How Did the Story Spread?]]


Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

[[folder:Why is Barkis Not a Wanted Man?]]


Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

[[folder:How Did Emily Know Victor's Name?]]


Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]

[[folder:How are the Servants Paid?]]


Added DiffLines:

[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It is possible they burned the last of their finances to keep Hildegarde and the Butler on their employ for while. The movie itself takes place over a week or so, so we can't really say if this was like the last month they could afford them. This would give added context to their hurry in marrying off Victoria and also to the butler's decision to go ScrewThisImOuttaHere in the climax. It is also possible, of course, that both are just continuing to serve out of a perhaps misplaced sense of gratitude and obligation.

to:

** It is possible they burned the last of their finances to keep Hildegarde and the Butler on their employ for while. The movie itself takes place over a week or so, so we can't really say if this was like the last month they could afford them. This would give added context to their hurry in marrying off Victoria and also to the butler's decision to go ScrewThisImOuttaHere in the climax. It is also possible, of course, that both are just continuing to serve out of a perhaps misplaced sense of gratitude and obligation.obligation.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Tried for murder and sent to (after)life in prison.

to:

** Tried for murder and sent sentenced to (after)life in prison.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Tried for murder and sent to (after)life in prison.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's possible that's just the 'rules' - you can't exactly marry two dead people in real life after all....

Changed: 9144

Removed: 13796

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* So are the dead people ghosts or just animated (no pun intended) corpses? If it is the latter, does that mean nothing actually dies (since Emily turns into butterflies when her "spirit" is released, it seems her soul is still connected to her body; and they actually are senitent)? If they are just ghosts, why are children stuck in the Underworld, did they have anything that would prevent them from moving on?
** On second thought, the dead "children" are probably just freaky midgets...

to:

* So are the dead people ghosts or just animated (no pun intended) corpses? If it is the latter, does that mean nothing actually dies (since Emily turns into butterflies when her "spirit" is released, it seems her soul is still connected to her body; and they actually are senitent)? dies? If they are just ghosts, why are children stuck in the Underworld, did they have anything that would prevent them from moving on?
** On second thought, the dead "children" are probably just freaky midgets...
on?



* What the hell happens to Emily in the end? Did she go to heaven? But nothing in the movie suggests that there IS a heaven in the described world - it seems like everyone just go to the Underworld and continue to live (to undie?) there forever. I mean, you would expect cute little children to go to heaven, if there was one...
** What? If that really was the only place people go, they'd be crowded a thousand years ago, man! There's obviously a heaven, and souls just stay there in the underworld as long as they have any unfinished business. And that's why she... vanished in the air.
*** You can`t tell if it is crowded or not, we don`t know the size of the underworld. Also, what unfinished business could Scraps have?
*** Waiting for someone perhaps?
*** No idea, but we'd probably see more neanderthals and old-timey stuff if that was the only underworld... the oldest ghosts there seem to be those two generals. And... guys, we're talking millions, or at least thousands of years of death here, unless the underworld is infnite (which it doesn't seem to be), the place seems a bit too underpopulated.
*** Underworld could very well be infinite to support a potentially infinite number of dead. Neanderthals and old-timers would probably prefer to hang out with people from their own time, and that is why you don`t see them in the movie.
*** Or the Skeletons in ''Die Die We All Pass Away'' are precisely the older. All that's left of them is unidentifiable skeletons, because the clothes that could identify them have all decomposed long ago.
*** [[{{Tropers/Nettik}} I]] assumed that the beings in the Underworld were waiting around for someone else to join them in death before moving on to the next world. It makes sense if you think about some of the inhabitants of the Underworld. The skeleton children may be waiting for their parents or their friends, Victor's dog was likely waiting for him, and Emily was waiting for Lord Barkis.
** She gets reincarnated. [[WildMassGuessing As V&V's KID!]]
** Or she moves to [[WesternAnimation/TheNightmareBeforeChristmas Halloween Land]]
** [[TheWormThatWalks Or she was, in fact, just a bunch of insects in a giant human suit.]]
** I interpreted it as something akin to reaching nirvana myself.

to:

* What the hell happens to Emily in the end? Did she go to heaven? But nothing in the movie suggests that there IS a heaven in the described world - it seems like everyone just go goes to the Underworld and continue to live (to undie?) there forever. I mean, you would expect cute little children to go to heaven, if there was one...
forever.
** What? If that really was the only place people go, they'd be crowded a thousand years ago, man! There's obviously a heaven, and souls just stay there in the underworld as long as they have any unfinished business. And that's why she... vanished in the air.
*** You can`t tell if it is crowded or not, we don`t know the size of the underworld. Also, what unfinished business could Scraps have?
*** Waiting for someone perhaps?
*** No idea, but we'd probably see more neanderthals and old-timey stuff if that was the only underworld... the oldest ghosts there seem to be those two generals. And... guys, we're talking millions, or at least thousands of years of death here, unless the underworld is infnite (which it doesn't seem to be), the place seems a bit too underpopulated.
*** Underworld could very well be infinite to support a potentially infinite number of dead. Neanderthals and old-timers would probably prefer to hang out with people from their own time, and that is why you don`t see them in the movie.
*** Or the Skeletons in ''Die Die We All Pass Away'' are precisely the older. All that's left of them is unidentifiable skeletons, because the clothes that could identify them have all decomposed long ago.
*** [[{{Tropers/Nettik}} I]] assumed that
business.
** Maybe
the beings in the Underworld were waiting around for someone else to join them in death before moving on to the next world. It makes sense if you think about some of the inhabitants of the Underworld. The skeleton children may be waiting for their parents or their friends, Victor's dog was likely waiting for him, and Emily was waiting for Lord Barkis.
** She gets reincarnated. [[WildMassGuessing As V&V's KID!]]
** Or she moves to [[WesternAnimation/TheNightmareBeforeChristmas Halloween Land]]
** [[TheWormThatWalks Or she was, in fact, just a bunch of insects in a giant human suit.]]
** I interpreted it as something akin to reaching nirvana myself.
Barkis.



* In a related theme, what happens to Barkis? It doesn't seem you can actually harm the dead. But I guess living in the Underworld, where everyone shuns you, is still a FateWorseThanDeath...

to:

* In a related theme, what happens to Barkis? It doesn't seem you can actually harm the dead. But I guess maybe living in the Underworld, where everyone shuns you, is still a FateWorseThanDeath...



*** "Beating the heck out of him" wouldn't work, since it's been established that the dead feel no pain... [[MindRape at least, not]] ''[[MindRape physical]]'' [[MindRape pain...]]
* A minor thing, but it has been bugging me -- where does Emily's bouquet go in the church when she's not holding it? She walks up to Victor in the church holding it, then it vanishes while she's saying her vows and during the Barkis/Victor fight, then it reappears once she's walking away from the reunited Victor and Victoria. But we never actually see her set it down or drop it.

to:

*** "Beating the heck out of him" wouldn't work, since it's been established that the dead feel no pain... [[MindRape at least, not]] ''[[MindRape physical]]'' [[MindRape pain...]]
* A minor thing, but it has been bugging me -- where Where does Emily's bouquet go in the church when she's not holding it? She walks up to Victor in the church holding it, then it vanishes while she's saying her vows and during the Barkis/Victor fight, then it reappears once she's walking away from the reunited Victor and Victoria. But we never actually see her set it down or drop it.



* And, of course, the kicker: Victor's parents [[PutOnABus get put on a carriage]] randomly in the middle of the movie and and are never seen again, dead or alive.
** They're last seen in a driverless carriage heading [[DeadFootLeadFoot down a hill]], complaining about the bumpy ride from running over [[HarsherInHindsight the driver's corpse]] as they do. [[LaserGuidedKarma What do you think]] [[MinorInjuryOverreaction happened]]? (...[[Administrivia/DataVampires I could swear I'd done this]] before, down to the last two {{Pot Hole}}s being the same.)
* Are the dead essentially ghosts? Just waiting around until passing on to another realm? Also, what happens when that underground city fills to the brim with dead people? What happens then?
** My guess is that the underworld cannot fill up, because it exists outside of time and space. It is most likely infinite.
** That city isn't the whole underworld--it's the underworld for the people who died and were buried in that specific town! Remember, everyone who came "upstairs" for the wedding was recognized by their family and friends, and when Victor tries to get Emily to take him home to "meet his parents," she asks him "Where are they buried?"
** They probably are not ghosts, but corpses. Why would the ghost form be rotting and decomposing?
* Exactly how "dead" do you have to be to go to the underworld. When that guy driving the carriage died, he headed there immediately. But Victor's dog, Scraps, is just a bunch of bones. Did they wait until he decayed into a pile of bones for him to get there?
** No, I think you arrive at least roughly about the time you die. You just happen to continue to rot while you're down there. Remember, the Bride's got a maggot living inside her. Scraps has probably been down there for a few years.
** Some of the characters' appearances imply how they died. For example, the "dwarf" has a sword through his chest. Maybe Scraps had a funeral pyre dedicated to him.

to:

* And, of course, the kicker: Victor's parents [[PutOnABus get put on a carriage]] randomly in the middle of the movie and and are never seen again, dead or alive.
** They're last seen Much like Victoria's parents, they disappear from the movie once they've served their purpose and it makes sense for them not to be there. The Van Dorts promised the Everglots that they would find and return with Victor for the wedding, so they'd have no reason to try and go back without him. As to what happened to them, it's unlikely being in a driverless carriage heading [[DeadFootLeadFoot down a hill]], complaining about the bumpy ride from running over [[HarsherInHindsight the driver's corpse]] as without its driver would've been enough to lead to their deaths. It's more likely they do. [[LaserGuidedKarma What do you think]] [[MinorInjuryOverreaction happened]]? (...[[Administrivia/DataVampires I could swear I'd done this]] before, down just realized that Mayhew had vanished at some point and sought out some other transport or gone to look for Victor on foot, with plans to return to the last two {{Pot Hole}}s being the same.)
* Are the dead essentially ghosts? Just waiting around until passing on to another realm? Also, what happens when that underground city fills to the brim with dead people? What happens then?
** My guess is that the underworld cannot fill up, because it exists outside of time and space. It is most likely infinite.
** That city isn't the whole underworld--it's the underworld for the people who died and were buried in that specific town! Remember, everyone who came "upstairs" for the wedding was recognized by their family and friends, and when Victor tries to get Emily to take him home to "meet his parents," she asks him "Where are they buried?"
** They probably are not ghosts, but corpses. Why would the ghost form be rotting and decomposing?
* Exactly how "dead" do you have to be to go to the underworld. When that guy driving the carriage died, he headed there immediately. But Victor's dog, Scraps, is just a bunch of bones. Did they wait until he decayed into a pile of bones for him to get there?
** No, I think you arrive at least roughly about the time you die. You just happen to continue to rot while you're down there. Remember, the Bride's got a maggot living inside her. Scraps has probably been down there for a few years.
** Some of the characters' appearances imply how they died. For example, the "dwarf" has a sword through his chest. Maybe Scraps had a funeral pyre dedicated to him.
village sooner or later.



** I think so. I remember Tim pointing out in ''WesternAnimation/TheNightmareBeforeChristmas'' DVDCommentary that the citizens being worried about Jack being dead [[FridgeLogic doesn't make sense]], as he is already dead. Then he said that they were more worried about Jack being ''gone'', so I think there's a possible DeaderThanDead scenario that can happen.
*** If it wasnt for WordOfGod, I never would of thought of Jack being dead, I thought they were all mostly some form of AnthropomorphicPersonification, all essentially the spirit of halloween, just like the christmastown has a real santa and elves.
* If the dead are not allowed to go onto the surface of the living, why was the Bride's hand seen sticking out of the ground. She must have been laying there and just an arm sticking out would count.
** I imagine this has something to do with her vow to wait for her true love to come set her free. You can't exactly do that if you're buried completely in the ground.
*** I always took her hand sticking out as being the remains of her body after Barkis killed her and stole her family's jewelry, and Victor 'proposing' to her brought her soul back to her body so she could track him down and 'kill' him...
* Would the dead continue to age like that old skeleton guy in the library, or stay the way they are?
** I just assumed Elder Gutknecht was very old when he died, then rotted away to a skeleton.
** Elder Gutknecht seemed to be from a previous generation of dead humans, perhaps a Homo Habilus? He is, rather literally, the Elder of Underworld, as he's been around longer than everyone else when they were alive...?
* Could just any living thing end up in the world of the dead, like Scraps? What about plants, insects, fungi, bacteria, algae?
** There were trees in the underworld, wasn't there? There has to be a lake somewhere with algae. Just because you don't see it, it doesn't mean it's nonexistent.
*** [[FridgeHorror Wait a second]], [[VideoGame/DantesInferno TREES]]?
* Speaking of animals, why can Maggot and Black Widow talk, and the other animals can't? Emily seems able to interpret Scraps's barks, but that's not the same as speaking plain English like Maggot and BW.
** It gets weirder when you compare ''WesternAnimation/CorpseBride'' with its spirital ancestor, ''WesternAnimation/TheNightmareBeforeChristmas''. Nightmare is technically Disney (a cousin of the animated canon, if you will), so you would expect it to having talking animals (image what Zero would sound like), but it doesn't. Perhaps it's so Emily can have some friends to talk to? Then why not other corpses?
** I figured that Scraps was a dead dog while Maggot and BW were (somehow) natural denizens of the underworld -- that is, beings that didn't have to die to get there. Scraps couldn't speak English (or any other human language) in life, so it carried into death, whereas Maggot and BW had always existed as supernatural English-speaking creatures.
* Why didn't Emily ever try her luck with another dead person? They can't ALL be taken, why wait for a living dude? This works in the original story, as the Corpse Bride is the only dead person, but not when there's other dead people! What about [[{{EnsembleDarkhorse}} Bonejangles]], he seems fun to hang out with. Actually, that's another thing; why couldn't Tim develop Bonejangles' character a bit more and had a PairTheSpares moment? Yeah, it's a cop-out, but it has [[{{TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot}} potential]].
** Poor Emily must be the type to miss the obvious "wait for a dead single guy" and insist on getting married to a living one. As for Bonejangles -- well, all I can say there is that Tim obviously had no idea how popular the guy would get. Must be Music/DannyElfman and his magic voice.
** It also occurs to me that her vow might have trapped her into marrying a living man, depending on how she actually worded it (i.e., did she just say "wait for [my] true love to come set [me] free," as in ''Remains of the Day'', or did she state that she'd wait for someone aboveground to propose?)

to:

** I think so. I remember Tim pointing Burton pointed out in the DVDCommentary for ''WesternAnimation/TheNightmareBeforeChristmas'' DVDCommentary that the citizens being worried about Jack being dead [[FridgeLogic doesn't make sense]], as he is already dead. Then he said that they were more worried about Jack being ''gone'', so I think implying that there's a possible DeaderThanDead scenario that can happen.
*** If it wasnt for WordOfGod, I never would of thought of Jack being dead, I thought they were all mostly some form of AnthropomorphicPersonification, all essentially the spirit of halloween, just like the christmastown has a real santa and elves.
* If the dead are not allowed to go onto the surface of the living, why was the Bride's hand seen sticking out of the ground. She must have been laying there and just an arm sticking out would count.
** I imagine this has something to do with her vow to wait for her true love to come set her free. You can't exactly do that if you're buried completely in the ground.
*** I always took her hand sticking out as being the remains of her body after Barkis killed her and stole her family's jewelry, and Victor 'proposing' to her brought her soul back to her body so she could track him down and 'kill' him...
* Would the dead continue to age like that old skeleton guy in the library, or stay the way they are?
** I just assumed Elder Gutknecht was very old when he died, then rotted away to a skeleton.
** Elder Gutknecht seemed to be from a previous generation of dead humans, perhaps a Homo Habilus? He is, rather literally, the Elder of Underworld, as he's been around longer than everyone else when they were alive...?
* Could just any living thing end up in the world of the dead, like Scraps? What about plants, insects, fungi, bacteria, algae?
** There were trees in the underworld, wasn't there? There has to be a lake somewhere with algae. Just because you don't see it, it doesn't mean it's nonexistent.
*** [[FridgeHorror Wait a second]], [[VideoGame/DantesInferno TREES]]?
* Speaking of animals, why can Maggot and Black Widow talk, and the other animals can't? Emily seems able to interpret Scraps's barks, but that's not the same as speaking plain English like Maggot and BW.
** It gets weirder when you compare ''WesternAnimation/CorpseBride'' with its spirital ancestor, ''WesternAnimation/TheNightmareBeforeChristmas''. Nightmare is technically Disney (a cousin of the animated canon, if you will), so you would expect it to having talking animals (image what Zero would sound like), but it doesn't. Perhaps it's so Emily can have some friends to talk to? Then why not other corpses?
** I figured that Scraps was a dead dog while Maggot and BW were (somehow) natural denizens of the underworld -- that is, beings that didn't have to die to get there. Scraps couldn't speak English (or any other human language) in life, so it carried into death, whereas Maggot and BW had always existed as supernatural English-speaking creatures.
* Why didn't Emily ever try her luck with another dead person? They can't ALL be taken, why wait for a living dude? This works in the original story, as the Corpse Bride is the only dead person, but not when there's other dead people! What about [[{{EnsembleDarkhorse}} Bonejangles]], he seems fun to hang out with. Actually, that's another thing; why couldn't Tim develop Bonejangles' character a bit more and had a PairTheSpares moment? Yeah, it's a cop-out, but it has [[{{TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot}} potential]].
people!
** Poor Emily must be the type to miss the obvious "wait for a dead single guy" and insist on getting married to a living one. As for Bonejangles -- well, all I can say there is that Tim obviously had no idea how popular the guy would get. Must be Music/DannyElfman and his magic voice.
one.
** It also occurs to me that her Her vow might have trapped her into marrying a living man, depending on how she actually worded it (i.e., did she just say "wait for [my] true love to come set [me] free," as in ''Remains of the Day'', or did she state that she'd wait for someone aboveground to propose?)



** They didn't seem that bad to me. However, the main reason is probably solidarity. Emily is very well-liked, and everybody who hurts her is looked down upon.
** This is actually obvious; to them, Victor had married Emily, plain and simple. Him going to Victoria, who to them was simply an "other", was basically akin to him cheating on Emily. Remember, Marriages back then really couldn't be considered an "Accident", and Divorce was also still a huge Social Faux-pas, possibly even to the dead. Also remember that a Woman's job at this time, even for someone as talented and intelligent as Emily, was to get married and raise a family, which would lead to someone such as Emily thinking so much about it (Especially since she was murdered over it). So the undead would vilify the Man in this case because he had been the unfaithful one to his wife (Victor to Emily), even if the Woman (Emily) wasn't sane about the subject.
*** You’re completely minimizing the issue. All Victor did was place a ring on what he thought to be a twig while practicing his vows — I’m pretty sure at no point in history would that be upheld as the grounds for a legal binding marriage. It’s completely ridiculous to take “Marriage can’t be accidental” and extrapolate that to something like this.
*** It's true that Victor's accidental proposal couldn't possibly be mistaken for a real marriage by any rational person, but Emily is the only one who was there when he practiced his vows. Likely all anyone else in the land of the dead knows is what Emily told them, that Victor said his vows to her "perfectly" and gave her a ring, meaning Bang! they're married. They're all already dead and they aren't getting any younger, who cares if the marriage has witnesses or a pastor or whatever, as long as two people love each other? So that's how they view Victor and Emily's relationship, and that's why they feel Victor is betraying Emily by going to Victoria. Victor iirc never exactly ''explains'' what happened, just that it was "a mistake".
* Does it bother anybody else that Victoria doesn't get a chance to go after Victor and Emily? You have to think about it from the perspective of it being a film - in-story, it makes sense, but the story wasn't born into existence, it was written, and it could have been written differently. It feels like the story goes out of its way to push Emily and Victor together, and suppresses Victoria in order to do so.
** Less tension and eventual confusion when the dead show up for Victor and Emily's wedding. If there were a way for Victoria to go after Victor, it would be common(ish) knowledge.
** What is meant when you say "go after them", anyway? Emily took Victor to the Underworld, and even if Victoria knew that at first, she still probably wouldn't know of a way to get there. She also does ''try'' to sneak out and get help, if you remember, but the guy from the church just brought her right back to her parents.
** Victoria would never have had a chance- Pastor Galswells' response was quite realistic for the time- any woman spouting such claims would be considered mad and sent home for detainment.
* Why on earth is Barkis attending Victor and Victoria's wedding?! He seems to be there just so that he can swoop in and take Victoria when Victor disappears with Emily, but he doesn't make any attempt on Victor's life or try to get him out of the way. My brother and I tried to restructure the film with this in mind and we thought it'd be a great idea to have Barkis be the one to suggest Victor practice in the woods - it opens the plot hole of, how could he know Emily was waiting for him, but he makes him a more effective villain and at least explains what he's doing there, and those kinds of plot holes are all over the place in Burton's films.
** 1) He could have waiting for SpeakNowOrForeverHoldYourPeace moment to deliver a TheReasonYouSuckSpeech.
** 2) Marrying Victoria was never his original goal, it was coincidence that he was there to take Victor's place. As one of the "upper crust" it was only polite/sociable (and smart) for him to attend a wedding of his peers/social group and use that opportunity to scout out potential bride (WITH a fortune, he did not know Victoria's family was broke.).
** 3) Emily may not have been factored at all. Pure dumb luck/fate seems to have led Victor to her. After all, if Barkis wanted Victor dead, he could watched, waited, and slit Victor's throat/backstab the second they were out of sight.
* The ending's great and all, but....[[{{FridgeLogic}} Victor and Victoria can't get married.]] Last anybody knew, Victoria got married to Lord Barkis. Who is dead, but how is anybody supposed to know, since his corpse was carried off? I'm sure it could be worked up, but it bugs me they couldn't clear that up better before the end to at least reassure us that the couple really could live happily ever after.
** I doubt anyone will be able to pull up legal documents enforcing that fact. In any case, it would be considered pretty trivial since the dead just got up and walked through town. It'd be all too easy to get people to believe that Barkis died before anything could be resolved. As to why they didn't show that, it would've broken the pace.

to:

** They didn't seem To start, no one in the underworld ever treats Victor like a jerk for how he treats Emily. The closest anyone gets to that bad to me. However, the main reason is probably solidarity. Elder Gutknecht, who mentions once that he agrees with Emily is very well-liked, and everybody who hurts about Victor lying to her is looked down upon.
** This is
to sneak back to Victoria -- but Elder Gutknecht doesn't know Victor's side of the story. No one does, not even Emily, because Victor never actually obvious; tells them. He initially leads Emily on to them, Victor had married Emily, plain try and simple. Him going to Victoria, who to them was simply an "other", was basically akin to him cheating on Emily. Remember, Marriages get back to the living world, and then he makes a vague appeal to her that the "marriage" was a mistake and "just can't work", but he never comes out and says that what Emily took as a proposal was really couldn't be considered an "Accident", and Divorce was also still a huge Social Faux-pas, possibly even to the dead. Also remember that a Woman's job at this time, even for someone as talented and intelligent as Emily, was to get married and raise a family, which would lead to someone such as Emily thinking so much about it (Especially since she was murdered over it). So the undead would vilify the Man in this case because he had been the unfaithful one to his wife (Victor to Emily), even if the Woman (Emily) wasn't sane about the subject.
*** You’re completely minimizing the issue. All Victor did was place a ring on what he thought to be a twig while
him practicing his vows — I’m pretty sure at no point in history would that be upheld as the grounds for a legal binding marriage. It’s completely ridiculous to take “Marriage can’t be accidental” and extrapolate that to something like this.
*** It's true that Victor's accidental proposal couldn't possibly be mistaken for a real marriage by any rational person, but Emily is the only one who was there when he practiced his vows. Likely all anyone else in the land of the dead knows is what Emily told them, that Victor said his
wedding vows to her "perfectly" and gave her a ring, meaning Bang! they're married. They're all already dead and they aren't getting any younger, who cares if the marriage has witnesses or a pastor or whatever, as long as two people love each other? So that's how they view Victor and Emily's relationship, and that's why they feel Victor is betraying another woman with no knowledge that Emily by going to Victoria. Victor iirc never exactly ''explains'' what happened, just was there. No doubt he would've garnered a lot more sympathy if he'd let on that it was "a mistake".
* Does it bother anybody else
that Victoria doesn't get a chance to go after Victor and Emily? You have to think about it was the case from the perspective of it being a film - in-story, it makes sense, but the story wasn't born into existence, it was written, and it could have been written differently. It feels like the story goes out of its way to push Emily and Victor together, and suppresses Victoria in order to do so.
** Less tension and eventual confusion when the dead show up for Victor and Emily's wedding. If there were a way for Victoria to go after Victor, it would be common(ish) knowledge.
** What is meant when you say "go after them", anyway? Emily took Victor to the Underworld, and even if Victoria knew that at first, she still probably wouldn't know of a way to get there. She also does ''try'' to sneak out and get help, if you remember, but the guy from the church just brought her right back to her parents.
** Victoria would never have had a chance- Pastor Galswells' response was quite realistic for the time- any woman spouting such claims would be considered mad and sent home for detainment.
beginning.
* Why on earth is Barkis attending Victor and Victoria's wedding?! wedding? He seems to be there just so that he can swoop in and take Victoria when Victor disappears with Emily, but he doesn't make any attempt on Victor's life or try to get him out of the way. My brother and I tried to restructure the film with this in mind and we thought it'd be a great idea to have Barkis be the one to suggest Victor practice in the woods - it opens the plot hole of, how could he know Emily way.
** He
was waiting for him, but he makes him a more effective villain and at least explains what he's doing there, and those kinds of plot holes are all over the place in Burton's films.
** 1) He could have waiting for SpeakNowOrForeverHoldYourPeace moment to deliver a TheReasonYouSuckSpeech.
** 2) Marrying Victoria was never his original goal, it was coincidence that he was
likely there to take Victor's place. As one of the "upper crust" it was only polite/sociable (and smart) for him to attend a wedding of his peers/social group and use that opportunity just to scout out potential bride (WITH a fortune, the ceremony and see what useful information he did not know could glean from it; he didn't plan on doing anything before he understood who was involved. He got lucky that Victor fumbled his vows to such a degree that Barkis could upstage him, but he wouldn't have lost anything even if that had been the case. At worst, he gets to attend the ceremony, meet other members of Victoria's upper-class family was broke.).
** 3) Emily may not have been factored at all. Pure dumb luck/fate seems to have led Victor to her. After all, if Barkis wanted Victor dead, he
who could watched, waited, be eligible for him to marry, and slit Victor's throat/backstab enjoy a free meal in the second they were out of sight.
process.
* The ending's great and all, but....[[{{FridgeLogic}} Victor and Victoria can't get married.]] married. Last anybody knew, Victoria got married to Lord Barkis. Who is dead, but how is anybody supposed to know, since his corpse was carried off? I'm sure it could be worked up, but it bugs me they couldn't clear that up better before the end to at least reassure us that the couple really could live happily ever after.
off?
** I doubt It's anyone will be able to pull up legal documents enforcing that fact. In any case, it would be considered pretty trivial since the dead just got up and walked through town. It'd be all too easy to get people to believe that Barkis died before anything could be resolved. As to why they didn't show that, it would've broken the pace.



* What haunts the other dead people we got to see? What keeps them stuck in the town and prevents them from becoming butterflies? Why cannot they go to heaven? A lot of people seem to have a lot of issues and unfinished businesses. And if they are troubled, why do they seem to be fairly happy?
** Emily was waiting to finally get married, everyone else could have something just as mundane they're waiting for. They could be waiting for parents, spouses, grandchildren, mastering their craft, the chance to punish someone who wronged them, anything.
** Maybe they aren't stuck, they actually like it there! Emily clearly had unfinished business, so naturally she wouldn't want to be in Dead Town. Once her unfinished business is cleared up, she gets to go to Heaven or, my favorite theory, be reincarnated. Bonejangles and the rest, however, like it just fine in Dead Town, so they don't have to go anywhere. That's why there are kids in the town, and why everyone seems to be pretty happy!
** They worked themselves into the grave in the terrible working conditions of the Victorian Era. Their unfinished business is taking time to relax and enjoy being alive, or post-alive in this case!
* Rather minor headscratcher, but during the scene in the beginning where Victor messes up the wedding rehearsal, he accidentally sets Mrs. Everglot's dress on fire, resulting in everyone scrambling to put it out until Barkis finally does so... by pouring ''wine'' on it. Wouldn't that make the fire worse?

to:

* What haunts the other dead people we got to see? What keeps them stuck in the town and prevents them from becoming butterflies? Why cannot they go to heaven? A lot of people seem to have a lot of issues and unfinished businesses. And if they are troubled, why do they seem to be fairly happy?
** Emily was waiting to finally get married, everyone else could have something just as mundane they're waiting for. They could be waiting for parents, spouses, grandchildren, mastering their craft, the chance to punish someone who wronged them, anything.
** Maybe they aren't stuck, they actually like it there! Emily clearly had unfinished business, so naturally she wouldn't want to be in Dead Town. Once her unfinished business is cleared up, she gets to go to Heaven or, my favorite theory, be reincarnated. Bonejangles and the rest, however, like it just fine in Dead Town, so they don't have to go anywhere. That's why there are kids in the town, and why everyone seems to be pretty happy!
** They worked themselves into the grave in the terrible working conditions of the Victorian Era. Their unfinished business is taking time to relax and enjoy being alive, or post-alive in this case!
* Rather minor headscratcher, but during the scene in the beginning where
When Victor messes up the wedding rehearsal, he accidentally sets Mrs. Everglot's dress on fire, resulting in everyone scrambling to put it out until Barkis finally does so... by pouring ''wine'' on it. Wouldn't that make the fire worse?



** True, what is inflammable in the cases of gasoline and alcohol is not the liquid, is the gas they produce.

to:

** True, what is inflammable in the cases of gasoline and alcohol is not the liquid, is but rather the gas they produce.



* When Emily presents her wedding gift to Victor, she pulls the gift box seemingly out of nowhere. Where did that box come from? Assuming it was just sitting there next to the bench, why was it just sitting there, and how did Emily know that her wedding gift would be there? Admittedly, one could say that she [[BatmanGambit put the gift box there and intentionally lead Victor to run to the same location]], but that raises some very [[{{Yandere}} disturbing]] [[ManipulativeBitch implications]] for Emily's character.
** Even if she did lead him there, that still doesn't really lead to any such implications - this ''is'' the girl who was murdered on her wedding night by someone she thought was her true love, and spent many long years beneath the same tree she died under waiting her new love to come and free her. Plus, she seems to legitimately believe that Victor is in love with her, or at the very least is oblivious to the fact that he isn't at first, and clearly generally loves him, in return. Thus, there isn't anything truly ''creepy'' about her leading him to that spot intentionally when you take what is known about her into account.



** Emily tried to elope, remember? After her father specifically said she couldn't marry Lord Barkis, the two of them just disappearing at the same time with the family valuables makes sense; they probably thought the "lovers" ran away and needed money to start a new life. The family probably disowned Emily for running off with a man they didn't approve of, and trying to arrest the man who ran off with their daughter would mean acknowledging that they couldn't control their own child. It's a bit of a pride thing.
** Still, that begs the question why, when Barkis turns up in town for Victor and Victoria's wedding, no one asks why Emily isn't with him. And even if her old friends and family just assumed that he had abandoned or divorced her, wouldn't Barkis' reputation be in the toilet considering the time period's attitudes towards divorce and seducing young women?
** Barkis might have used a different name - [[FridgeLogic or for that matter, does so with Victoria's parents]], and possibly wears disguises. Also, it appears as quite a bit of time has passed since then, given Emily's young appearance and the obvious age difference between him and Victoria. Her parents may well have passed on.

* What was Lord Barkis's plan when he showed up to the rehearsal? He didn't try to do much to psych out Victor or even charm the Everglots, so what was he trying to do? What would he have done if Victor had came back from the woods/never disappeared in the first place?
** I was wondering this too. It'd be different if we saw him suggest for Victor to go in the woods or saw him follow Victor there to try to kill him or something but we don't. I can see them not wanting to spoil him as the villain but it's still pretty obvious he's gonna be the villain from the start. Plus again, we don't see him charming the Everglots while Victor's gone he just kinda shows up and leaves randomly.
** I think Barkis [[FakeAristocrat is not actually a lord at all]], and was at the rehearsal solely to pass himself off as one. The story makes note that Victoria's parents don't recognize him, implying that this is suspicious. And he ''is'' a con artist, so it makes sense he would be faking it.

to:

** Emily tried to elope, remember? After her father specifically said she couldn't marry Lord Barkis, the two of them just disappearing at the same time with the family valuables makes sense; they probably thought the "lovers" ran away and needed money to start a new life. The family probably disowned Emily for running off with a man they didn't approve of, and trying to arrest the man who ran off with their Their daughter would mean acknowledging that they couldn't control stealing their own child. It's a bit of a pride thing.
** Still, that begs the question why, when Barkis turns up in town for Victor
family jewels and Victoria's wedding, no one asks why Emily eloping isn't with him. And even if her old friends and family just assumed that he had abandoned or divorced her, wouldn't Barkis' reputation be in the toilet considering the time period's attitudes towards divorce and seducing young women?
** Barkis might have used a different name - [[FridgeLogic or for that matter, does so with Victoria's parents]], and possibly wears disguises. Also, it appears as quite a bit of time has passed since then, given
something Emily's young appearance family would probably want to be known to the public, and Barkis was described as a "mysterious stranger" in "Remains of the obvious Day", making it unlikely anyone knew enough about him to be on the lookout for ''him'' as opposed to Emily. And Emily being interested in Victor implies Barkis was around the same age difference between as him and Victoria. Her parents may well have passed on.

* What was Lord Barkis's plan
when he showed up to originally wooed her, whereas in the rehearsal? movie proper, he's old enough for his hair to have gone grey. He didn't try probably stayed away from the village long enough for Emily's remaining family to do much have died off, and might have only returned there in the present because he's spent all the money he stole from Emily. Do note that he does mention a late wife of his when making his bid to psych out Victor or even charm the Everglots, so what was he trying to do? What would he have done if Victor had came back from the woods/never disappeared in the first place?
** I was wondering this too. It'd be different if we saw him suggest for Victor to go in the woods or saw him follow Victor there to try to kill him or something but we don't. I can see them not wanting to spoil him as the villain but it's still pretty obvious
suggesting he's gonna be the villain from the start. Plus again, we don't see him charming the Everglots while Victor's gone he just kinda shows up and leaves randomly.
** I think Barkis [[FakeAristocrat is not actually a lord
confident enough at all]], and was at the rehearsal solely to pass himself off as one. The story makes note this point that Victoria's parents don't no one will recognize him, implying that this is suspicious. And he ''is'' a con artist, so it makes sense he would be faking it.
him or remember what he's thought to have done.




* If the Everglots were broke, then how they paid Hildegarde and the butler for their services? I don't think these two worked for free, though I agree that Hildegarde would have done it as long she could accompany Victoria...
** It is possible they burned the last of their finances to guarantee Hildegarde and the Butler on their employ for while. The movie itself takes place over a week or so, so we can't really say if this was like the last month they could afford them. This would give added context to their hurry in marrying off Victoria and also to the butler's decision to go ScrewThisImOuttaHere in the climax. It is also possible, of course, that both are just continuing to serve out of a (peerhaps misplaced0 sense of gratitude and obligation.

to:

\n* If the Everglots were broke, then how they paid Hildegarde and the butler for their services? I don't think these two worked It seems doubtful that they would've continued working for free, though I agree that although maybe Hildegarde would have done did it as long to ensure she could accompany Victoria...
remain with Victoria.
** It is possible they burned the last of their finances to guarantee keep Hildegarde and the Butler on their employ for while. The movie itself takes place over a week or so, so we can't really say if this was like the last month they could afford them. This would give added context to their hurry in marrying off Victoria and also to the butler's decision to go ScrewThisImOuttaHere in the climax. It is also possible, of course, that both are just continuing to serve out of a (peerhaps misplaced0 perhaps misplaced sense of gratitude and obligation.

Top