Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / CalvinAndHobbes

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

****Hobbes appearing as a stuffed doll in the strip where Calvin imagines a newspaper is an oblique acknowledgment by Calvin's mind that Hobbes is indeed a doll, or at least appears to others as a doll.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




to:

\n[[/folder]]

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding to the discussion

Added DiffLines:


[[folder: Hobbes in the washing machine]]
*The washing machine strips conclusively demonstrate that Hobbes can't really be the large living tiger that Calvin sees him as. The Hobbes that Calvin sees is approximately five feet tall. This is easily calculated by comparing Hobbes to the size of Calvin, then comparing the size of Calvin to his father, and making the reasonable assumption that Calvin's father is the height of an average U.S. male (5 ft 9). The washing machine is a top loading machine with an agitator. It's a physical impossibility for a five foot solid living animal to fit in such a machine (five feet is taller than the adult Danny Devito, and no one could argue that he could fit in the machine.) But the fact is that Hobbes DOES fit in the machine. Everyone, including Calvin, agrees that he fits in it. The only way to explain this contradiction is Calvin imagining the size of Hobbes. The true, objective size of Hobbes must be the size of a doll. I use the word objective because not only does everyone agree that Hobbes fits in the machine, but since the machine is an inanimate object, it can't have a subjective viewpoint. It can only hold what's objectively small enough to fit in it. Once it's accepted that Calvin must be imagining the size of Hobbes, it's a very short leap to say that he imagines other things about Hobbes (being alive, talking, etc).

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope was cut/disambiguated due to cleanup


*** Again, Hobbes is displayed bipedal, so it happened. Calvin knows that doing something different will change the past, so ForWantOfANail the future will suck.

to:

*** Again, Hobbes is displayed bipedal, so it happened. Calvin knows that doing something different will change the past, so ForWantOfANail for-want-of-a-nail the future will suck.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Replaced another dead link.


** The ropes were covering Calvin's arms. No, really, [[http://comics.roderickmann.org/episodes/CalvinAndHobbes/2017/11/CalvinAndHobbes20171126.gif take a look at the first strip in the series]]. How exactly could Calvin have tied himself up if the ropes were covering his arms?

to:

** The ropes were covering Calvin's arms. No, really, [[http://comics.roderickmann.org/episodes/CalvinAndHobbes/2017/11/CalvinAndHobbes20171126.gif [[https://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2017/11/27 take a look at the first strip in the series]]. How exactly could Calvin have tied himself up if the ropes were covering his arms?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Besides, Calvin ''does'' have a fair bit in common with his dad; just read any strip where Calvin asks his dad a genuine question, and Dad responds with a ridiculous response--Dad is just as imaginative as Calvin is, and seems to have a streak of mischief too.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** What the other troper presumably means is that, while Calvin ''draws'' on reality in his Spiff / Stupendous Man / Tracer fantasies, they are clearly established as just that: fantasies. The strip will make it clear that Calvin is just playacting as Spiff and Tracer Bullet to make something that he's coping with in "reality" a bit more fun and bearable (for example, the strip where "Spiff" is captured and tied down by aliens who intend to subject him to an unbearable torture, which turns out to actually be his father delivering a boring lecture on his favourite parental cliches in reality). They're not meant to be taken as a potential version of reality in the same way that his adventures with Hobbes are.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** Uh, Spaceman Spiff's stuff normally has some equivalent real-world stuff. Same with Stupendous Man and Tracer Bullet.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One: As such a thing is never mentioned, he probably wasn't hired, and two: Its probably something like a [[Series/DoctorWho TARDIS]].

to:

** One: As such a thing is never mentioned, he probably wasn't hired, and two: Its It's probably something like a [[Series/DoctorWho TARDIS]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Or perhaps the family's last name begins with a Z. That would explain "Zokbar-''2''"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** 'Xactly. Most of the examples of LostEpisode[=s=] are stuff that had to be taken away due to crossing the line. This alternate strip is just... Unfunny, at most?

to:

*** 'Xactly. Most of the examples of LostEpisode[=s=] {{Lost Episode}}s are stuff that had to be taken away due to crossing the line. This alternate strip is just... Unfunny, at most?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Susie is not actually "interacting with Calvin" in that example.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** There is an element of personality and morals we're overlooking here. While he might wind up Calvin from time to time, there's no real malice to Hobbes; for example, his glomps of Calvin when he returns home are clearly in large part over-enthusiastic affection because he's happy to see Calvin again, as expressed through the cunning and predator instincts of a tiger. Any put-downs he makes of Calvin are usually done in an eye-rolling fashion when Calvin has just said something ludicrously pompous, self-serving or deluded and needs his bubble popped a little. When he does get genuinely annoyed or aggressive, it's usually because he's been provoked by something Calvin has done. In short, Hobbes receives little comeuppance because he rarely does anything which ''requires'' comeuppance, nor is he motivated by any real negative impulses except for maybe a little mischievousness. Calvin, on the other hand, is frequently a bit more malicious to those around him. He loudly takes pleasure in bullying Suzie by throwing snowballs and water balloons at her. He's frequently more brazen and unapologetic in his trouble-making, and conducts himself more arrogantly and pompously with the people around him. He's more calculating and self-serving in what he can get away with (witness all his rule-lawyering around Christmastime when he has to factor in what Santa is likely to approve of). In short, not only does Calvin do more which requires some kind of comeuppance, but he is usually more ill-intentioned in his motivations for what he does where Hobbes is not. It's not just the action being punished, but the underlying motive behind the action.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Those kids also often went to a friend's house to play their friend's video games. Being much more of a loner, Calvin likely didn't have any friends to hang out with, and wasn't exposed to home console systems in the mid-to-late 198s enough to notice.

to:

*** Those kids also often went to a friend's house to play their friend's video games. Being much more of a loner, Calvin likely didn't have any friends to hang out with, and wasn't exposed to home console systems in the mid-to-late 198s 1980s enough to notice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Those kids also often went to a friend's house to play their friend's video games. Being much more of a loner, Calvin likely didn't have any friends to hang out with, and wasn't exposed to home console systems in the mid-to-late 198s enough to notice.
*** Also, Calvin was perpetually six-years-old, and was just shy of the age group (8-14 year olds) to which the NES (1985), Genesis (1989), and SNES (1991) were primarily targeted. It's likely that his parents didn't think him old enough to own a home video game console.

Added: 78

Changed: 426

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Brad and Janet.
*** [[Film/TheRockyHorrorPictureShow ...Why does this work!?!]]

to:

** Being a kid in TheEighties, I always thought of Calvin's parents looking like a "Bob" and "Cathy", which were common adult names at the time. They were also the names of my parents' friends, who (yes) looked '''''exactly''''' like Calvin's parents. (Their son didn't look like Calvin, but their daughter ''did'' look like Suzie Derkins!)
*** As for a last name? Watterson. So, Bob and Cathy Watterson.
** [[Film/TheRockyHorrorPictureShow
Brad and Janet.
*** [[Film/TheRockyHorrorPictureShow ...
Janet.]] ...Why does this work!?!]]work!?!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Updating Link


* How does Hobbes's status as an endangered species prevent him from meeting babes? I heard that [[Franchise/TheSimpsons the ladies dig you when you're the last of something]].

to:

* How does Hobbes's status as an endangered species prevent him from meeting babes? I heard that [[Franchise/TheSimpsons [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons the ladies dig you when you're the last of something]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Despite what ''Film/BackToTheFuture'' may tell you, offspring don't tend to have the same exact personalities as their parents. Also, Calvin is heavily implied to be a Gifted child stuck in an uncaring, unengaging public school system. Maybe if he was dumber, he'd act closer to them.

to:

** Despite what ''Film/BackToTheFuture'' ''Franchise/BackToTheFuture'' may tell you, offspring don't tend to have the same exact personalities as their parents. Also, Calvin is heavily implied to be a Gifted child stuck in an uncaring, unengaging public school system. Maybe if he was dumber, he'd act closer to them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, to fully understand this we need to look at this, at least partly, from the perspective of the characters interacting with Calvin rather than just Calvin or as a reader. And let's be totally honest here; from their perspective, Calvin is a ''lot'' to put up with. We interact with Calvin for the length of time it takes to read three to nine panels of a comic a day, which is what? Five to ten minutes? Sure, under those circumstances Calvin is endearing. However, in Calvin's world, Calvin's parents, teachers and classmates have to interact with him on a frequent basis, over which the personality quirks we find endearing can quickly become insufferable. As for his snowmen, he's definitely got talent, but they're also frequently grotesque, macabre, inconveniencing (at least one of them prevents his dad from being able to drive to work) and generally more of an annoyance they would be to the person seeing it in a comic strip who doesn't have to deal with it. Again, we can appreciate the talent and artistic qualities because we don't have to live with it; for Calvin's parents, it's just another headache their let's-face-it-a-bit-of-a-pain-in-the-ass kid has caused them.

to:

** Also, to fully understand this we need to look at this, at least partly, from the perspective of the characters interacting with Calvin rather than just Calvin or as a reader. And let's be totally honest here; from their perspective, Calvin is a ''lot'' to put up with. We interact with Calvin for the length of time it takes to read three to nine panels of a comic a day, which is what? Five to ten minutes? minutes, tops? Sure, under those circumstances Calvin is endearing. However, in Calvin's world, Calvin's parents, teachers and classmates have to interact with him on a frequent basis, over which the personality quirks we find endearing can quickly become insufferable. As for his snowmen, he's definitely got talent, but they're also frequently grotesque, macabre, inconveniencing (at least one of them prevents his dad from being able to drive to work) and generally more of an annoyance they would be to the person seeing it in a comic strip who doesn't have to deal with it. Again, we can appreciate the talent and artistic qualities because we don't have to live with it; for Calvin's parents, it's just another headache their let's-face-it-a-bit-of-a-pain-in-the-ass kid has caused them.



** As with the immediately previous Headscratcher this is at least partly explained by remembering the perspective of the characters around Calvin, who have to put up with him for much longer than the reader does, in addition to / rather than just Calvin's personal perspective. The reader finds Calvin charming, his arguments erudite and compelling, his creative endeavours awe-inspiring and inspirational, and so forth, because they only have to put up with them for upwards of five-ten minutes a day at most. Furthermore, they're viewing Calvin's adventures through the distance and remove provided by a sheet of newspaper, the page of a book or the screen of a computer or phone. The other characters, meanwhile, have to deal with Calvin, in person, in their world, on a daily basis. They have to stand there and actually listen to Calvin constantly coming up with long-winded, self-serving and pompous arguments for why he's the centre of the universe and should be able to do whatever he wants without fear of repercussion. They are constantly inconvenienced by his works of "art" which are often impractically large, macabre and mildly-to-moderately destructive. They are forced to put up with him disrupting their jobs and lives because what's going on doesn't happen to interest him personally and therefore can't possibly be of any value to anyone else. They have to suffer the brunt of his insults and snowball / water balloon attacks, however cleverly worded or fiendishly schemed. They have to watch on every time he chucks a wobbly whenever the universe doesn't treat him fairly, or even if it ''is'' treating him fairly but he merely perceives it to be otherwise simply because it isn't showering him with endless rewards merely for existing. In short, they have to routinely put up with him almost constantly being a massive hyperactive self-centred pain-in-the-ass who frequently runs around leaving chaos in his wake, and unlike us they don't have the option of turning the page or closing the book if ever he starts to grate. It's fine for us to condemn them for not appreciating Calvin's genius at a distance; but frankly, if we had to put up with Calvin and his ways for even half the time that the characters who interact with him have to, there is a greater-than-zero chance that we the reader would come to regard him as a rather insufferable little shit as well.

to:

** As with the immediately previous Headscratcher this is at least partly explained by remembering the perspective of the characters around Calvin, who have to put up with him for much longer than the reader does, in addition to / rather than just Calvin's personal perspective. The reader finds Calvin charming, his arguments erudite and compelling, his creative endeavours awe-inspiring and inspirational, and so forth, because they only have to put up with them for upwards of five-ten a couple of minutes a day at most. Furthermore, they're viewing Calvin's adventures through the distance and remove provided by a sheet of newspaper, the page of a book or the screen of a computer or phone. The other characters, meanwhile, have to deal with Calvin, in person, in their world, on a daily basis. They have to stand there and actually listen to Calvin constantly coming up with long-winded, self-serving and pompous arguments for why he's the centre of the universe and should be able to do whatever he wants without fear of repercussion. They are constantly inconvenienced by his works of "art" which are often impractically large, macabre and mildly-to-moderately destructive. They are forced to put up with him disrupting their jobs and lives because what's going on doesn't happen to interest him personally and therefore can't possibly be of any value to anyone else. They have to suffer the brunt of his insults and snowball / water balloon attacks, however cleverly worded or fiendishly schemed. They have to watch on every time he chucks a wobbly whenever the universe doesn't treat him fairly, or even if it ''is'' treating him fairly but he merely perceives it to be otherwise simply because it isn't showering him with endless rewards merely for existing. In short, they have to routinely put up with him almost constantly being a massive hyperactive self-centred pain-in-the-ass who frequently runs around leaving chaos in his wake, and unlike us they don't have the option of turning the page or closing the book if ever he starts to grate. It's fine for us to condemn them for not appreciating Calvin's genius at a distance; but frankly, if we had to put up with Calvin and his ways for even half the time that the characters who interact with him have to, there is a greater-than-zero chance that we the reader would come to regard him as a rather insufferable little shit as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** True, but remember that we only see the family getaways that offer the most entertainment value. It is possible that Dad, despite his stubbornness, relents on some occasions and does some things that Mom likes to do (if only, again, for the purposes of having a peaceful life); we just don't see them because they turn out much better than his hare-brained camping expeditions, and thus have less entertainment value. As for "life will ''seem'' like a vacation if your vacation is awful", in context that's pretty clearly Dad just making excuses for a miserable family vacation rather than an iron-clad ideological stance adhered to with rigid force.


Added DiffLines:

** The former. Social commentary and sentiment aren't mutually exclusive. Part of what makes the strip so beloved is that it manages to effectively combine some pointed commentary on American society in the 1980s with genuine warmth and sentiment in a balanced fashion without becoming either too snide by letting the former dominate or too saccharine by letting the latter take over.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** This argument would be sound except for the fact that Mom loudly and bitterly makes it clear to both her husband and son that she hates camping, which seems to imply that she's there against her will. Dad's overall fanatical attitude (such as forcing them to be up and at 'em at six in the morning for fishing), plus his later preaching that as long as your vacations are difficult, life will ''seem'' like a vacation, suggests that he's not about to let anyone else pitch vacation ideas as long as he's the one making money.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** For a reminder, the ending page of ''Scientific Progress Goes "Boink"'' has an image depicting Hobbes laughing along ''with'' Calvin at the unflattering drawing of Susie they did on the sidewalk (as she walks by and sees it herself).


Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Genuine Good or Subtle Satire?]]
* Somewhat meta. It has not escaped my notice that despite Calvin putting his parents or Hobbes through torment and back (with other concerned parties mentioned either responding in turn ''or'' sometimes just being their harsher selves with far less impetus), they'll just as often be part of [[AwLookTheyReallyDoLoveEachOther a sentimental moment with each other]]. Given Watterson used the strip as a means for social commentary and the like (particularly with society and America's flawed education system), is the strip ''genuinely'' showing that others do love (or at most ''tolerate'') him [[HairTriggerTemper despite thoughtlessly flaring tempers when provoked]] (without considering how this might affect him nor trying to make anything better themselves) or is it more tongue-in-cheek, given everything we see in the strip?
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In all the years of reading Calvin and Hobbes, I never got over the fact that it seems not a ''single person in the world'' ever reacts to Calvin's antics with anything other than annoyance/anger. It's not just Calvin's parents or teacher, who would feel worn down over time -- not even his classmates, neighbours, or random strangers ever laugh ''once'' at what he does, even the funny harmless things. I even remember one strip where Calvin's mom remarks how they get less traffic on their street thanks to Calvin's snowmen. Now imagine that there was a kid who actually made snowmen like that. Do you really think that everyone would avoid that house or would they constantly drive past to take photos? It's just an extreme ValuesDissonance that while we find Calvin hysterical, everyone in his world in a humorless jackass.

to:

* In all the years of reading Calvin and Hobbes, I never got over the fact that it seems not a ''single person in the world'' ever reacts to Calvin's antics with anything other than annoyance/anger. It's not just Calvin's parents or teacher, who would feel worn down over time -- not even his classmates, neighbours, or random strangers ever laugh ''once'' at what he does, even the funny harmless things. I even remember one strip where Calvin's mom remarks how they get less traffic on their street thanks to Calvin's snowmen. Now imagine that there was a kid who actually made snowmen like that. Do you really think that everyone would avoid that house or would they constantly drive past to take photos? It's just an extreme ValuesDissonance that while we find Calvin hysterical, everyone in his world in is a humorless jackass.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** My younger brother and sister spent most of one winter making odd and rather monstrous snow creatures every time it snowed. (ages six and eight) Our grandmas reaction to finding, in her front yard, a tableau of snowmen fleeing in terror from a snowblower, was to say we all clearly needed more chores after school. The neighbors didn't appreciate it much either.

to:

** My younger brother and sister spent most of one winter making odd and rather monstrous snow creatures every time it snowed. (ages six and eight) Our grandmas reaction to finding, in her front yard, a tableau {{tableau}} of snowmen fleeing in terror from a snowblower, was to say we all clearly needed more chores after school. The neighbors didn't appreciate it much either.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Little kids in general tend to have different perspectives on time and distance than adults do (remember when a half an hour was an eternity as a kid while as an adult it's barely enough time to do anything?). Calvin ''thinks'' he's travelled a huge distance, but he's probably barely left the street.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Calvin's perspective is shown to be way bigger and more bizarre than anyone else's so (if you presume that's why his backyard wagon rides appear to go through a massive woodlands) chances are he didn't go actually too far outside the house. Alternately, maybe his mom heard Calvin panicking (when he mistook her for a bear going through the brush) and that's how she managed to find him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:How Did Mom Find Our Heroes So Fast?]]
* In the story arc where our heroes push the family car into a ditch, they run away because of what they think Calvin's parents will do to him. Despite that, Mom seems to find them pretty quickly, given that she probably would have needed time to call Dad and have him come home to handle everything with the tow truck and the police while she looked for our heroes. I'd have thought that gave our heroes lots of time to get a head start on Mom, but she seems to find them pretty quickly. Just how far did they even get?
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Keep in mind that in one arc, Susie has to go to Calvin's house after school for the day, and we see that the very first thing she does is take out her books and start doing homework, with her comments stating that she'll work even ''more'' later that night to make sure she understands everything. It's a remarkably rigid schedule for a six-year-old, so perhaps either her parents don't allow time for making friends (especially since she has other extracurricular activities on her plate), or Susie herself thinks she's "too busy" for it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As with the immediately above Headscratcher, this is at least partly explained by remembering the perspective of the characters around Calvin, who have to put up with him for much longer than the reader does. The reader finds Calvin charming, his arguments erudite and compelling, his creative endeavours awe-inspiring and inspirational, and so forth, because they only have to put up with them for upwards of five-ten minutes a day if so they choose through the distance and remove provided by viewing his adventures on a sheet of newspaper, the page of a book or the screen of a computer or phone. The other characters, meanwhile, have to deal with Calvin, in person, in their world, on a daily basis. They have to stand there and actually listen to Calvin constantly coming up with long-winded, self-serving and slightly pompous arguments for why he's the centre of the universe and should be able to do whatever he wants without fear of repercussion. They are constantly inconvenienced by his works of "art" which are often impractically large, macabre and mildly-to-moderately destructive. They are forced to put up with him disrupting their jobs and lives because what's going on doesn't happen to interest him personally and therefore can't possibly be of any value to anyone else. They have to watch on every time he chucks a wobbly whenever the universe doesn't treat him fairly, or even if it ''is'' treating him fairly but he merely perceives it to be otherwise simply because it isn't showering him with endless rewards merely for existing. In short, they have to routinely put up with him almost constantly being a massive hyperactive self-centred pain-in-the-ass who frequently runs around leaving chaos in his wake, and unlike us they don't have the option of turning the page or closing the book if ever he starts to grate. It's fine for us to condemn them for not appreciating Calvin's genius; but frankly, if we had to put up with Calvin and his ways for even half the time that the characters who interact with him have to, there is a greater-than-zero chance that we the reader would come to regard him as a rather insufferable little shit as well.

to:

** As with the immediately above Headscratcher, previous Headscratcher this is at least partly explained by remembering the perspective of the characters around Calvin, who have to put up with him for much longer than the reader does. does, in addition to / rather than just Calvin's personal perspective. The reader finds Calvin charming, his arguments erudite and compelling, his creative endeavours awe-inspiring and inspirational, and so forth, because they only have to put up with them for upwards of five-ten minutes a day if so they choose at most. Furthermore, they're viewing Calvin's adventures through the distance and remove provided by viewing his adventures on a sheet of newspaper, the page of a book or the screen of a computer or phone. The other characters, meanwhile, have to deal with Calvin, in person, in their world, on a daily basis. They have to stand there and actually listen to Calvin constantly coming up with long-winded, self-serving and slightly pompous arguments for why he's the centre of the universe and should be able to do whatever he wants without fear of repercussion. They are constantly inconvenienced by his works of "art" which are often impractically large, macabre and mildly-to-moderately destructive. They are forced to put up with him disrupting their jobs and lives because what's going on doesn't happen to interest him personally and therefore can't possibly be of any value to anyone else. They have to suffer the brunt of his insults and snowball / water balloon attacks, however cleverly worded or fiendishly schemed. They have to watch on every time he chucks a wobbly whenever the universe doesn't treat him fairly, or even if it ''is'' treating him fairly but he merely perceives it to be otherwise simply because it isn't showering him with endless rewards merely for existing. In short, they have to routinely put up with him almost constantly being a massive hyperactive self-centred pain-in-the-ass who frequently runs around leaving chaos in his wake, and unlike us they don't have the option of turning the page or closing the book if ever he starts to grate. It's fine for us to condemn them for not appreciating Calvin's genius; genius at a distance; but frankly, if we had to put up with Calvin and his ways for even half the time that the characters who interact with him have to, there is a greater-than-zero chance that we the reader would come to regard him as a rather insufferable little shit as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed natter


** Your child begins expressing creativity in macabre, disturbing ways, and your first thought is how you're going to monetize him? Parent of the fucking year.
*** It's a normal phase some kids go through, and no need for the attitude.
*** Certainly that would have been out of character for Calvin's father, who is the worst sort of cynic when it comes to such things.

Top