Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Fridge / TheBurntPartBoys

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Jake and Chet were both eight years old when their fathers died... and they both structure their lives in eight-hour pieces.

to:

* Jake and Chet were both eight years old when their fathers died... and they both structure their lives in eight-hour pieces. \n As if they can't break the cycle.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Jake and Chet were both eight years old when their fathers died... and they both structure their lives in eight-hour pieces.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's chilling to think that Frances was three years old when the incident happened, so she must have spent her most innocent years watching her mother get worse and worse. It's possibly even more chilling when you consider that Chet was eight when he was orphaned. Eight!

to:

** It's chilling to think that Frances was three years old when the incident happened, so she must have no doubt spent her most innocent years watching her mother gradually get worse and worse. It's possibly worse... and don't even more chilling when you ''start'' to consider that Chet was eight when he was orphaned. Eight!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's chilling to think that Frances was three years old when the incident happened, so she must have spent her most innocent years watching her mother get worse and worse. It's even more chilling to think that Chet was eight when he was orphaned. Eight!

to:

** It's chilling to think that Frances was three years old when the incident happened, so she must have spent her most innocent years watching her mother get worse and worse. It's possibly even more chilling to think when you consider that Chet was eight when he was orphaned. Eight!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's chilling to think that Frances was three years old at the time, so she must have spent her most innocent years watching her mother get worse and worse. It's even more chilling to think that Chet was eight when he was orphaned. Eight!

to:

** It's chilling to think that Frances was three years old at when the time, incident happened, so she must have spent her most innocent years watching her mother get worse and worse. It's even more chilling to think that Chet was eight when he was orphaned. Eight!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's chilling to think that Frances was three years old at the time and spent her most innocent years watching her mother get worse and worse. It's even more chilling to think that Chet was eight when he was orphaned. ''Eight!''

to:

** It's chilling to think that Frances was three years old at the time and time, so she must have spent her most innocent years watching her mother get worse and worse. It's even more chilling to think that Chet was eight when he was orphaned. ''Eight!''Eight!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* All four main characters whose fathers died in the mine have spent ''over half their lives'' living in grief. This in turn means that Jake and Pete's mother has been depressed for over half their lives, Frances' mother has struggled with alcohol abuse for over half her life, Chet has been an orphan for over half his life... and so on.

to:

* All four main characters whose fathers died in the mine have spent ''over half their lives'' living in grief. This in turn means that Jake and Pete's mother has been depressed for over half their lives, Frances' mother has struggled with alcohol abuse for over half her life, Chet has been an orphan for over half his life... and so on.on.
** It's chilling to think that Frances was three years old at the time and spent her most innocent years watching her mother get worse and worse. It's even more chilling to think that Chet was eight when he was orphaned. ''Eight!''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* All five main characters have spent over 'half their lives' living in grief.

to:

* All five four main characters whose fathers died in the mine have spent over 'half ''over half their lives' lives'' living in grief.grief. This in turn means that Jake and Pete's mother has been depressed for over half their lives, Frances' mother has struggled with alcohol abuse for over half her life, Chet has been an orphan for over half his life... and so on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There are several moments in the musical that emphasise the cyclical nature of the plot: the 24-hour chronology, the monotonous lifestyles of Jake and Chet ("Eight hours digging, eight hours drifting, eight hours drinking, five days a week!"), the repetitive nature of the climbing songs... but what makes the cyclical theme especially brilliant is that despite Pete's best efforts, things ''don't'' come exactly full circle. If they had done, then all the kids would be dead and the musical would have ended immediately after 'Countdown'. Instead, they survive - and literally ''break out'' of their own suffering. Their own cycle of grief. The kids are naturally distressed after the mine gets blown up for the second time and they get trapped down there, but part of that distress (and the eventual reason they're able to get over their grief) is - quite crucially - because ''they didn't expect to survive''. As Pete says about his father, "No man can disturb [his] deep deep sleep" ... but something disturbed what was supposed to be theirs.

to:

** There are several moments in the musical that emphasise the cyclical nature of the plot: the 24-hour chronology, the monotonous lifestyles of Jake and Chet ("Eight hours digging, eight hours drifting, eight hours drinking, five days a week!"), the repetitive nature of the climbing songs... but what makes the cyclical theme especially brilliant is that despite Pete's best efforts, things ''don't'' come exactly full circle. If they had done, then all the kids would be dead and the musical would have ended immediately after 'Countdown'. Instead, they survive - and literally ''break out'' of their own suffering. Their own cycle of grief. The kids are naturally distressed after the mine gets blown up for the second time and they get trapped down there, but part of that distress (and the eventual reason they're able to get over their grief) is - quite crucially - because ''they didn't expect to survive''. As Pete says about his father, "No man can disturb [his] deep deep sleep" ... but something disturbed what was supposed to be theirs.theirs.

[[AC:Fridge Horror]]
* All five main characters have spent over 'half their lives' living in grief.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There are several moments in the musical that emphasise the cyclical nature of the plot: the 24-hour chronology, the monotonous lifestyles of Jake and Chet ("Eight hours digging, eight hours drifting, eight hours drinking, five days a week!"), the repetitive nature of the climbing songs... but what makes the cyclical theme especially brilliant is that despite Pete's best efforts, things ''don't'' come exactly full circle. If they had done, then all the kids would be dead and the musical would have ended immediately after 'Countdown'. Instead, they survive - and literally ''break out'' of their own suffering. Their own cycle of grief. The kids are naturally distressed after the mine gets blown up for the second time and they get trapped down there, but part of that distress (and the eventual reason they're able to get over their grief) is - quite crucially - because ''they didn't expect to survive''. As Pete says about his father - "No man can disturb his deep deep sleep" ... but something disturbed what was supposed to be theirs.

to:

** There are several moments in the musical that emphasise the cyclical nature of the plot: the 24-hour chronology, the monotonous lifestyles of Jake and Chet ("Eight hours digging, eight hours drifting, eight hours drinking, five days a week!"), the repetitive nature of the climbing songs... but what makes the cyclical theme especially brilliant is that despite Pete's best efforts, things ''don't'' come exactly full circle. If they had done, then all the kids would be dead and the musical would have ended immediately after 'Countdown'. Instead, they survive - and literally ''break out'' of their own suffering. Their own cycle of grief. The kids are naturally distressed after the mine gets blown up for the second time and they get trapped down there, but part of that distress (and the eventual reason they're able to get over their grief) is - quite crucially - because ''they didn't expect to survive''. As Pete says about his father - father, "No man can disturb his [his] deep deep sleep" ... but something disturbed what was supposed to be theirs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There are several moments in the musical that emphasise the cyclical nature of the plot: the 24-hour chronology, the monotonous lifestyles of Jake and Chet ("Eight hours digging, eight hours drifting, eight hours drinking, five days a week!"), the repetitive nature of the climbing songs... but what makes the cyclical theme especially brilliant is that despite Pete's best efforts, things ''don't'' come exactly full circle. If they had done, then all the kids would be dead and the musical would have ended immediately after 'Countdown'. Instead, they survive - and literally ''break out'' of their own suffering. Their own cycle of grief. The kids are naturally distressed after the mine gets blown up for the second time and they get trapped down there, but part of that distress (and the eventual reason they're able to get over their grief) is - quite crucially - because ''they didn't expect to live''.

to:

** There are several moments in the musical that emphasise the cyclical nature of the plot: the 24-hour chronology, the monotonous lifestyles of Jake and Chet ("Eight hours digging, eight hours drifting, eight hours drinking, five days a week!"), the repetitive nature of the climbing songs... but what makes the cyclical theme especially brilliant is that despite Pete's best efforts, things ''don't'' come exactly full circle. If they had done, then all the kids would be dead and the musical would have ended immediately after 'Countdown'. Instead, they survive - and literally ''break out'' of their own suffering. Their own cycle of grief. The kids are naturally distressed after the mine gets blown up for the second time and they get trapped down there, but part of that distress (and the eventual reason they're able to get over their grief) is - quite crucially - because ''they didn't expect to live''.survive''. As Pete says about his father - "No man can disturb his deep deep sleep" ... but something disturbed what was supposed to be theirs.

Added: 913

Changed: 43

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* At first, Pete choosing to ''blow up'' the Burnt Part rather than just sabotaging Jake personally (for instance, hiding all his mining stuff, framing him for something he didn't do, causing him injury so he couldn't go to work, etc) seems quite extreme, even for someone who loves his action movies... until you realise that it's cyclical. An explosion on the Burnt Part is what started everything ten years prior, and Pete intends to end it in the same way. This makes sense if you consider his ethos; Pete would most likely have viewed it as the only fitting way of sending his father off and protecting Jake, because explosions are what he associates with the mine and, in turn, his grief. Hence 'Countdown'.

to:

* At first, Pete choosing to ''blow up'' the Burnt Part rather than just sabotaging Jake personally (for instance, hiding all his mining stuff, framing him for something he didn't do, causing him injury so he couldn't go to work, etc) seems quite extreme, even for someone who loves his action movies... until you realise that it's intended to be cyclical. An explosion on the Burnt Part is what started everything ten years prior, and Pete intends to end it in the same way. This makes sense if you consider his ethos; Pete would most likely have viewed it as the only fitting way of sending his father off and protecting Jake, because explosions are what he associates with the mine and, in turn, his suffering.
** There are several moments in the musical that emphasise the cyclical nature of the plot: the 24-hour chronology, the monotonous lifestyles of Jake and Chet ("Eight hours digging, eight hours drifting, eight hours drinking, five days a week!"), the repetitive nature of the climbing songs... but what makes the cyclical theme especially brilliant is that despite Pete's best efforts, things ''don't'' come exactly full circle. If they had done, then all the kids would be dead and the musical would have ended immediately after 'Countdown'. Instead, they survive - and literally ''break out'' of their own suffering. Their own cycle of
grief. Hence 'Countdown'.The kids are naturally distressed after the mine gets blown up for the second time and they get trapped down there, but part of that distress (and the eventual reason they're able to get over their grief) is - quite crucially - because ''they didn't expect to live''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* At first, Pete choosing to ''blow up'' the Burnt Part rather than just sabotaging Jake personally (for instance, hiding all his mining stuff, framing him for something he didn't do, causing him injury so he couldn't go to work, etc) seems quite extreme, even for someone who loves his action movies... until you realise that it's cyclical. An explosion on the Burnt Part is what started everything ten years prior, and Pete intends to end it in the same way. This makes sense if you consider his ethos; Pete would most likely have viewed it as the 'proper' way of sending his father off and protecting Jake, because explosions are what he associates with the mine. Hence 'Countdown'.

to:

* At first, Pete choosing to ''blow up'' the Burnt Part rather than just sabotaging Jake personally (for instance, hiding all his mining stuff, framing him for something he didn't do, causing him injury so he couldn't go to work, etc) seems quite extreme, even for someone who loves his action movies... until you realise that it's cyclical. An explosion on the Burnt Part is what started everything ten years prior, and Pete intends to end it in the same way. This makes sense if you consider his ethos; Pete would most likely have viewed it as the 'proper' only fitting way of sending his father off and protecting Jake, because explosions are what he associates with the mine.mine and, in turn, his grief. Hence 'Countdown'.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC:Fridge Brilliance]]
* At first, Pete choosing to ''blow up'' the Burnt Part rather than just sabotaging Jake personally (for instance, hiding all his mining stuff, framing him for something he didn't do, causing him injury so he couldn't go to work, etc) seems quite extreme, even for someone who loves his action movies... until you realise that it's cyclical. An explosion on the Burnt Part is what started everything ten years prior, and Pete intends to end it in the same way. This makes sense if you consider his ethos; Pete would most likely have viewed it as the 'proper' way of sending his father off and protecting Jake, because explosions are what he associates with the mine. Hence 'Countdown'.

Top