Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Fridge / MurderOnTheOrientExpress2017

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This also explains why they didn’t kill Poirot after killing Ratchett to prevent him from solving what happened, they were all unwilling to kill an innocent person even though there was a real chance he could figure out what happened and have them arrested.

to:

** This also explains why they didn’t kill Poirot after killing Ratchett to prevent him from solving what happened, they were all unwilling to kill cross the line of killing an innocent person even though there was a despite the real chance he could figure out what happened and have them arrested.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This also explains why they didn’t kill Poirot after killing Ratchett to prevent him from solving what happened, they were all unwilling to kill an innocent bystander even though there was a real chance he could figure out that some or all of them were responsible and have them arrested.

to:

** This also explains why they didn’t kill Poirot after killing Ratchett to prevent him from solving what happened, they were all unwilling to kill an innocent bystander person even though there was a real chance he could figure out that some or all of them were responsible what happened and have them arrested.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This also explains why they all didn’t kill Poirot after killing Ratchett to prevent him from solving what happened, they were all unwilling to kill an innocent bystander even though there was a real chance he could figure out that some or all of them were responsible for Ratchett’s death and have them turned in.

to:

** This also explains why they all didn’t kill Poirot after killing Ratchett to prevent him from solving what happened, they were all unwilling to kill an innocent bystander even though there was a real chance he could figure out that some or all of them were responsible for Ratchett’s death and have them turned in.arrested.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This also explains why they all didn’t kill Poirot after killing Ratchett, they were all unwilling to kill an innocent bystander even though there was a real chance he could figure out that some or all of them were responsible for Ratchett’s death and have them turned in.

to:

** This also explains why they all didn’t kill Poirot after killing Ratchett, Ratchett to prevent him from solving what happened, they were all unwilling to kill an innocent bystander even though there was a real chance he could figure out that some or all of them were responsible for Ratchett’s death and have them turned in.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This also explains why they all didn’t kill Poirot after killing Ratchett, they were all unwilling to kill an innocent bystander even though there was a real chance he could figure out that some or all of them were responsible for Ratchett’s death and have them turned in.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** There are still plenty of police officers present; they almost certainly dragged the mob off him and arrested him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Linda Arden attempted suicide ''in front of her daughter''. Imagine how horrific that was for the already-traumatised Helena, and how much more horrific it would have been if not for Poirot's SecretTestOfCharacter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* What happened to the captain who stole the priceless relic and tried to frame three holy men after the mob got him? Given that three groups of people were on the verge of a riot because of the accusations against their religious leader and Peroit pointed out that the captain set them up to fall for his crime, they may have killed him if the guards couldn’t rescue him in time.

to:

* What happened to the captain who stole the priceless relic and tried to frame three holy men after the mob got him? Given that three groups of people were on the verge of a riot because of the accusations against their religious leader leader, and Peroit Poirot pointed out that the captain set them up to fall for his crime, they may have killed him if the guards couldn’t rescue him in time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [=McQueen=] is revealed to have been stealing money from Ratchett for years since he has been employed by the man. Given how many people are involved in this conspiracy to kill him, it seems likely not all have the financial means to get to Istanbul for the trip. [=McQueen=] likely helped with some of them by using Ratchett's own money to help pay for their travel rather than one of the richer conspirators pay for things.

to:

* [=McQueen=] is revealed to have been stealing money from Ratchett for years since he has been employed by the man. Given how many people are involved in this conspiracy to kill him, it seems likely not all have the financial means to get to Istanbul for the trip. [=McQueen=] likely helped with some of them by using Ratchett's own money to help pay for their travel rather than having one of the richer conspirators pay for things.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* [=McQueen=] is revealed to have been stealing money from Ratchett for years since he has been employed by the man. Given how many people are involved in this conspiracy to kill him, it seems likely not all have the financial means to get to Istanbul for the trip. [=McQueen=] likely helped with some of them by using Ratchett's own money to help pay for their travel rather than one of the richer conspirators pay for things.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Second time watching this, one notices Helena is ''not'' among the people who stabbed Casetti. When you think about it, this is understandable on three levels. First, it's established that poor Helena is ''afraid'' of Casetti, afraid of how he indirectly killed her sister Sonya. She's too frightened to face the man who keeps her up at night. Second, Count Andrenyi (who seemingly has no direct attachment to the Armstrongs other than their relationship to his wife) possibly came along because, given his protectiveness of Helena, he meant to stab Casetti on her behalf. Thirdly, even if she couldn't stab Casetti, she still played a role in the conspiracy with the kimono Hardman lent her.

to:

* Second time watching this, one notices Helena is ''not'' among the people who stabbed Casetti. When you think about it, this is understandable on three levels. First, it's established that poor Helena is ''afraid'' of Casetti, afraid of how he indirectly killed her sister Sonya. She's too frightened to face the man who keeps her up at night. Second, Count Andrenyi (who seemingly has no direct attachment to the Armstrongs other than their relationship to his wife) possibly came along because, given his protectiveness of Helena, he meant to stab Casetti on her behalf. Thirdly, even if she couldn't stab Casetti, she still played a role in the conspiracy with the kimono Hardman lent her.
her.(In the book, it's explained that Helena never left her cabin, and her husband took her place.)

Added: 167

Changed: 698

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Second time watching this, one notices Helena is ''not'' among the people who stabbed Casetti. When you think about it, this is understandable on three levels. First, it's established that poor Helena is ''afraid'' of Casetti, afraid of how he indirectly killed her sister Sonya. She's too frightened to face the man who keeps her up at night. Second, Count Andrenyi (who seemingly has no direct attachment to the Armstrongs other than their relationship to his wife) possibly came along because, given his protectiveness of Helena, he meant to stab Casetti on her behalf. Thirdly, even if she couldn't stab Casetti, she still played a role in the conspiracy with the kimono Hardman lent her.


Added DiffLines:

* Is [=MacQueen's=] father still alive after his ordeal with the Armstrong case, or did he kill himself out of shame? Either way, the answer is poignantly unsettling.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It also explains why Michel relocated [=MacQueen=] to a different room from Poirot: he wanted to make sure he was bunked with someone who was in on the plan.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Even so, he never even ''says'' "the French". They're the only party he never says a word about.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** He actually specified "Belgian", which is the inspector's ethnicity.

Changed: 1569

Removed: 1839

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Sharp eyes will notice Poirot actually has ''two'' mustaches. This is a visual cue that Poirot hides his true self behind a facade.



* The suspects are also seated as a visual reference to Leonardo da Vinci's ''The Last Supper'', except there's ''12'' of them -- there's no Judas.
** Or there's no Jesus... and Linda Arden is sitting in Judas' position. Part of her despairing rant even notes that she considers the rest of the passengers good people who she inspired to do a bad act. Judas also realizes what he just did to Jesus and hanged himself; Linda Arden realizes the lengths she went through to get revenge and attempted to shoot herself.
** There's a Jesus. It's Poirot, passing judgment on the suspects, (or at least attempting to) acting as the voice of the other person who knows the truth - "[their] God".
* The SecretTestOfCharacter is how Poirot resolved his ToBeLawfulOrGood dilemma. Had someone attempted to shoot him, he'd have turned them in. Not only did no one try to kill him, Linda Arden proved she was willing to pay the ultimate price, proving to Poirot they understood the depths of their crime. Additionally, it proved that even though they killed Casetti, they were unwilling to commit another murder, even if the fate of them all depended on it. The fact that they all, to a man, shouted, "No!" when Linda turned the gun on herself also counted. This showed Poirot that they were still good people, whose moral sense had not been compromised.

to:

* The suspects are also seated as a visual reference to Leonardo da Vinci's ''The Last Supper'', except there's ''12'' of them -- there's no Judas.
** Or there's no Jesus... and
them. Poirot, their judge, could be considered the missing Jesus. If so, Linda Arden is sitting in Judas' position. Part of her despairing rant even notes that she considers the rest of the passengers good people who she inspired to do a bad act. Judas also realizes what he just did to Jesus and hanged himself; Linda Arden realizes the lengths she went through to get revenge and attempted to shoot herself.
** There's a Jesus. It's Poirot, passing judgment on the suspects, (or at least attempting to) acting as the voice of the other person who knows the truth - "[their] God".
* The SecretTestOfCharacter is how Poirot resolved his ToBeLawfulOrGood dilemma. Had someone attempted to shoot him, he'd have turned them in. Not only did does no one try to kill him, they all cry "No!" when Linda Arden proved she was willing to pay picks up the ultimate price, proving to Poirot gun, showing that they understood are all unwilling to let someone else commit a murder to save them. Arden's attempted suicide proves that she understands the depths of their crime. Additionally, it proved that even though they killed Casetti, they were unwilling to commit another murder, even if the fate All of them all depended on it. The fact that they all, to a man, shouted, "No!" when Linda turned the gun on herself also counted. This showed this shows Poirot that they were are still good people, whose moral sense had not been compromised.



* Why does everyone seem so suspicious of everyone else? It's not because they think one of them's a murderer. It's because they think one of them might crack and expose what they've all done to Poirot.
** Similarly, why they all stare suspiciously at [=MacQueen=] when he comes back from his first interview with Poirot; they likely suspect that he's the most probable weak link.

to:

* Why does everyone seem so suspicious of everyone else? It's not because they think one of them's a murderer. It's because they think one of them might crack and expose what they've all done to Poirot. \n** Similarly, This explains why they all stare suspiciously at [=MacQueen=] when he comes back from his first interview with Poirot; they likely suspect Poirot. They're worried that he's he might be the most probable weak link.



* [=MacQueen=] is shocked and dismayed Poirot is bunking with him because it's probable a 13th conspirator was going to be there instead of him.
** Actually, there ''was'' a 13th passenger with a reservation (one Mr Harris) who never made it in time, and whose seat was then assigned last minute to Poirot. This man was nothing but a name, a way to ensure all the carriage was booked by the conspirators and Ratchett and thus no outsider would interfere nor be affected by the murder. The reason why [=MacQueen=] is taken aback by Poirot's presence on the train is because no one was ''supposed'' to be there in the first place.
** And also because it throws a spanner into the plan; even if [=MacQueen=] isn't aware that he's now bunking with the greatest detective in the world, it's nevertheless someone else who could throw everything out of order.

to:

* [=MacQueen=] is shocked and dismayed Poirot is bunking with him because it's probable a the 13th conspirator was going to be there instead of him.
** Actually, there ''was'' a 13th passenger with a reservation (one Mr Harris) who never made it in time, and whose seat was then assigned last minute to Poirot. This man was nothing but a name, a way to ensure all the carriage was booked by the
passenger, "Mr Harris," is fictional. The conspirators and Ratchett and thus no outsider faked the reservation so that there would interfere nor be affected by no passengers on the murder. The reason why train who were not in on the scheme and might interfere. [=MacQueen=] is taken aback by Poirot's presence on the train is because no one was ''supposed'' never supposed to be there in the first place.
** And also because it throws
have a spanner into the plan; even if [=MacQueen=] isn't aware that he's now bunking with the greatest detective in the world, it's nevertheless someone else who could throw everything out of order.bunkmate.



* When his identity is revealed, Hardman makes a point of apologising to Poirot and his fellow investigators for the bigoted comments about race he made in his undercover identity, even though the person he made them towards and regarding -- Dr. Arbuthnot -- is not present. Of course, since Arbuthnot actually knows and is working with Hardman, Arbuthnot is probably well aware that Hardman was just acting and is not actually a racist, and so no apology to him is likely needed. The apology was so that ''Poirot'' would not be left with the wrong idea.

to:

* When his identity is revealed, Hardman makes a point of apologising to Poirot and his fellow investigators for the bigoted comments about race he made in his undercover identity, even though the person he made them towards and regarding -- Dr. Arbuthnot -- is not present. Of course, since Arbuthnot actually knows and is working with Hardman, Arbuthnot is probably well aware that Hardman was just acting and is not actually a racist, and so no apology to him is likely needed. The apology was so that ''Poirot'' would is to maintain his cover of not be left with the wrong idea.
knowing Arbuthnot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Princess Dragomiroff mentions that Linda Arden would've turned to directing if not for the tragedy, and that she would've been a titan of Broadway. Seems a bit of a stretch for a great actress to be a great director, especially in the time the film is set...and then you learn that Linda Arden had been 'directing' everyone involved in the murder, utilizing several of their talents to her advantage and putting on a very convincing show for Ratchett and Poirot. She certainly had a talent for directing, and the Princess could tell.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Actually, there ''was'' a 13th passanger with a reservation (one Mr Harris) who never made it in time, and whose seat was then assigned last minute to Poirot. This man was nothing but a name, a way to ensure all the carriage was booked by the conspirators and Ratchett and thus no outsider would interfere nor be affected by the murder. The reason why [=MacAueen=] is taken aback by Poirot's presence on the train is because no one was ''supposed'' to be there in the first place.

to:

** Actually, there ''was'' a 13th passanger passenger with a reservation (one Mr Harris) who never made it in time, and whose seat was then assigned last minute to Poirot. This man was nothing but a name, a way to ensure all the carriage was booked by the conspirators and Ratchett and thus no outsider would interfere nor be affected by the murder. The reason why [=MacAueen=] [=MacQueen=] is taken aback by Poirot's presence on the train is because no one was ''supposed'' to be there in the first place.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Pilar claims she's a light sleeper. As proven in the flashback, the reason she became a light sleeper is that the last time she dozed off, she lost her charge Daisy.

to:

* Pilar claims she's a light sleeper. As proven in the flashback, the reason she became a light sleeper is that the last time she dozed off, she lost her charge charge, Daisy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* When Poirot gives the passengers the opportunity to shoot him, he says Bouc can lie to the police but he can't. At the end of the story, it is Bouc who gives Poirot's other, flawed theory to the police while Poirot remains silent.

Changed: 260

Removed: 130

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Editing for accuracy.


* The beginning of the movie mirrors the story. A guilty party hires Poirot thinking they won't solve the case, yet he ''does''.
** Not quite, since the person who both gets Poirot aboard the train and then asks him to solve the case is Bouc, who is innocent.

to:

* The beginning of the movie mirrors the story. A guilty party (the police chief/Ratchett) hires Poirot (or tries to hire) Poirot, thinking they he won't solve the case, figure out their secret, yet he ''does''.
** Not quite, since the person who both gets Poirot aboard the train and then asks him to solve the case is Bouc, who is innocent.
''does''.



* When refusing to protect Ratchett, Poirot makes a point that he got himself in trouble for getting mixed up with the wrong people. He's not too far off the mark. But ironically, the kind of people Ratchett's in trouble with aren't gangsters. On the contrary, ''he himself'' is a gangster, and the people he's in trouble with all happen to be ''non-gangsters''.

to:

* When refusing to protect Ratchett, Poirot makes a point that he got himself in trouble for getting mixed up with the wrong people. He's not too far off the mark. But ironically, the kind of people Ratchett's in trouble with aren't gangsters. On the contrary, ''he himself'' is a gangster, and the people he's in trouble with all happen to be ''non-gangsters''. It also becomes ironic because Poirot tells Ratchett he hunts down criminals; he doesn't protect them, but by the end, he's been convinced to lie to protect a whole trainful of criminals.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Generally, if you're in the Fridge page, you don't need to worry about spoilers; you've either seen the film or you don't mind elements of the plot being revealed.


** Or there's no Jesus... [[spoiler:and Linda Arden is sitting in Judas' position. Part of her despairing rant even notes that she considers the rest of the passengers good people who she inspired to do a bad act. Judas also realizes what he just did to Jesus and hanged himself; Linda Arden realizes the lengths she went through to get revenge and attempted to shoot herself.]]
** There's a Jesus. [[spoiler: It's Poirot, passing judgment on the suspects, (or at least attempting to) acting as the voice of the other person who knows the truth - "[their] God".]]
* The SecretTestOfCharacter is how Poirot resolved his ToBeLawfulOrGood dilemma. Had someone attempted to shoot him, he'd have turned them in. Not only did no one try to kill him, Linda Arden proved she was willing to pay the ultimate price, proving to Poirot they understood the depths of their crime. Additionally, it proved that even though they killed Casetti, they were unwilling to commit another murder, even if the fate of them all depended on it. The fact that they all, to a man, shouted, "No!" when [[spoiler: Linda turned the gun on herself]] also counted. This showed Poirot that they were still good people, whose moral sense had not been compromised.

to:

** Or there's no Jesus... [[spoiler:and and Linda Arden is sitting in Judas' position. Part of her despairing rant even notes that she considers the rest of the passengers good people who she inspired to do a bad act. Judas also realizes what he just did to Jesus and hanged himself; Linda Arden realizes the lengths she went through to get revenge and attempted to shoot herself.]]
herself.
** There's a Jesus. [[spoiler: It's Poirot, passing judgment on the suspects, (or at least attempting to) acting as the voice of the other person who knows the truth - "[their] God".]]
God".
* The SecretTestOfCharacter is how Poirot resolved his ToBeLawfulOrGood dilemma. Had someone attempted to shoot him, he'd have turned them in. Not only did no one try to kill him, Linda Arden proved she was willing to pay the ultimate price, proving to Poirot they understood the depths of their crime. Additionally, it proved that even though they killed Casetti, they were unwilling to commit another murder, even if the fate of them all depended on it. The fact that they all, to a man, shouted, "No!" when [[spoiler: Linda turned the gun on herself]] herself also counted. This showed Poirot that they were still good people, whose moral sense had not been compromised.



* Poirot steps in camel excrement in the beginning of the film. While most people would realize it was disgusting, Poirot only notices how things are out of balance and steps in the poop with his other foot and is satisfied despite both of his shoes being dirtied and ruined. [[spoiler:At the end of the film, Poirot does the reverse: he steps into a situation that is out of balance with a crime committed, but is forced to notice how messy and uncomfortable the situation is and ends with choosing a solution that cleans up the situation instead of restoring balance.]]
* [[spoiler:Poirot is upset by the lack of balance at the solution of the case: people committed murder by revenge and a definite crime, but Casetti was bad enough the passenger's morals are still higher. He also hates having to live with himself at letting the murderers go. But a balance is still in place in a way: both sides have to live with a decision that will torment them and both have thus received punishment for their actions.]]

to:

* Poirot steps in camel excrement in the beginning of the film. While most people would realize it was disgusting, Poirot only notices how things are out of balance and steps in the poop with his other foot and is satisfied despite both of his shoes being dirtied and ruined. [[spoiler:At At the end of the film, Poirot does the reverse: he steps into a situation that is out of balance with a crime committed, but is forced to notice how messy and uncomfortable the situation is and ends with choosing a solution that cleans up the situation instead of restoring balance.]]
balance.
* [[spoiler:Poirot Poirot is upset by the lack of balance at the solution of the case: people committed murder by revenge and a definite crime, but Casetti was bad enough the passenger's morals are still higher. He also hates having to live with himself at letting the murderers go. But a balance is still in place in a way: both sides have to live with a decision that will torment them and both have thus received punishment for their actions.]]
actions.
* When his identity is revealed, Hardman makes a point of apologising to Poirot and his fellow investigators for the bigoted comments about race he made in his undercover identity, even though the person he made them towards and regarding -- Dr. Arbuthnot -- is not present. Of course, since Arbuthnot actually knows and is working with Hardman, Arbuthnot is probably well aware that Hardman was just acting and is not actually a racist, and so no apology to him is likely needed. The apology was so that ''Poirot'' would not be left with the wrong idea.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There's a Jesus. [[spoiler: It's Poirot, passing judgment on the suspects, acting as the voice of the other person who knows the truth - "[their] God".]]
* The SecretTestOfCharacter is how Poirot resolved his ToBeLawfulOrGood dilemma. Had someone attempted to shoot him, he'd have turned them in. Not only did no one try to kill him, Linda Arden proved she was willing to pay the ultimate price, proving to Poirot they understood the depths of their crime. Additionally, it proved that even though they killed Casetti, they were unwilling to commit another murder, even if the fate of them all depended on it. The fact that they all, to a man, shouted, "No!" when [[spoiler: Linda turned the gun on herself.]] also counted. This showed Poirot that they were still good people, whose moral sense had not been compromised.

to:

** There's a Jesus. [[spoiler: It's Poirot, passing judgment on the suspects, (or at least attempting to) acting as the voice of the other person who knows the truth - "[their] God".]]
* The SecretTestOfCharacter is how Poirot resolved his ToBeLawfulOrGood dilemma. Had someone attempted to shoot him, he'd have turned them in. Not only did no one try to kill him, Linda Arden proved she was willing to pay the ultimate price, proving to Poirot they understood the depths of their crime. Additionally, it proved that even though they killed Casetti, they were unwilling to commit another murder, even if the fate of them all depended on it. The fact that they all, to a man, shouted, "No!" when [[spoiler: Linda turned the gun on herself.]] herself]] also counted. This showed Poirot that they were still good people, whose moral sense had not been compromised.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The SecretTestOfCharacter is how Poirot resolved his ToBeLawfulOrGood dilemma. Had someone attempted to shoot him, he'd have turned them in. Not only did no one try to kill him, Linda Arden proved she was willing to pay the ultimate price, proving to Poirot they understood the depths of their crime. Additionally, it proved that even though they killed Casetti, they were unwilling to commit another murder, even if the fate of them all depended on it. This showed Poirot that they were still good people, whose moral sense had not been compromised.

to:

* The SecretTestOfCharacter is how Poirot resolved his ToBeLawfulOrGood dilemma. Had someone attempted to shoot him, he'd have turned them in. Not only did no one try to kill him, Linda Arden proved she was willing to pay the ultimate price, proving to Poirot they understood the depths of their crime. Additionally, it proved that even though they killed Casetti, they were unwilling to commit another murder, even if the fate of them all depended on it. The fact that they all, to a man, shouted, "No!" when [[spoiler: Linda turned the gun on herself.]] also counted. This showed Poirot that they were still good people, whose moral sense had not been compromised.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** There's a Jesus. [[spoiler: It's Poirot, passing judgment on the suspects, acting as the voice of the other person who knows the truth - "[their] God".]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Poirot steps in camel excrement in the beginning of the film. While most people would realize it was disgusting, Poirot only notices how things are out of balance and steps in the poop with his other foot and is satisfied despite both of his shoes being dirtied and ruined. At the end of the film, Poirot does the reverse: he notices a situation is out of balance and a crime committed, but is forced to notice how messy and uncomfortable the situation is [[spoiler:and ends with choosing a situation that cleans up the situation instead of restoring balance.]]

to:

* Poirot steps in camel excrement in the beginning of the film. While most people would realize it was disgusting, Poirot only notices how things are out of balance and steps in the poop with his other foot and is satisfied despite both of his shoes being dirtied and ruined. At [[spoiler:At the end of the film, Poirot does the reverse: he notices steps into a situation that is out of balance and with a crime committed, but is forced to notice how messy and uncomfortable the situation is [[spoiler:and and ends with choosing a situation solution that cleans up the situation instead of restoring balance.]]
* [[spoiler:Poirot is upset by the lack of balance at the solution of the case: people committed murder by revenge and a definite crime, but Casetti was bad enough the passenger's morals are still higher. He also hates having to live with himself at letting the murderers go. But a balance is still in place in a way: both sides have to live with a decision that will torment them and both have thus received punishment for their actions.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Poirot steps in camel excrement in the beginning of the film. While most people would realize it was disgusting, Poirot only notices how things are out of balance and steps in the poop with his other foot and is satisfied despite both of his shoes being dirtied and ruined. At the end of the film, Poirot does the reverse: he notices a situation is out of balance and a crime committed, but is forced to notice how messy and uncomfortable the situation is [[spoiler:and ends with choosing a situation that cleans up the situation instead of restoring balance.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Or there's no Jesus... [[spoiler:and Linda Arden is sitting in Judas' position. Part of her despairing rant even notes that she considers the rest of the passengers good people who she inspired to do a bad act. Judas also realizes what he just did to Jesus and hanged himself; Linda Arden realizes the lengths she went through to get revenge and attempted to shoot herself.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
That's how it's spelt in the movie.


** Similarly, why they all stare suspiciously at [=McQueen=] when he comes back from his first interview with Poirot; they likely suspect that he's the most probable weak link.

to:

** Similarly, why they all stare suspiciously at [=McQueen=] [=MacQueen=] when he comes back from his first interview with Poirot; they likely suspect that he's the most probable weak link.



* [=McQueen=] is shocked and dismayed Poirot is bunking with him because it's probable a 13th conspirator was going to be there instead of him.
** Actually, there ''was'' a 13th passanger with a reservation (one Mr Harris) who never made it in time, and whose seat was then assigned last minute to Poirot. This man was nothing but a name, a way to ensure all the carriage was booked by the conspirators and Ratchett and thus no outsider would interfere nor be affected by the murder. The reason why [=McQueen=] is taken aback by Poirot's presence on the train is because no one was ''supposed'' to be there in the first place.
** And also because it throws a spanner into the plan; even if [=McQueen=] isn't aware that he's now bunking with the greatest detective in the world, it's nevertheless someone else who could throw everything out of order.

to:

* [=McQueen=] [=MacQueen=] is shocked and dismayed Poirot is bunking with him because it's probable a 13th conspirator was going to be there instead of him.
** Actually, there ''was'' a 13th passanger with a reservation (one Mr Harris) who never made it in time, and whose seat was then assigned last minute to Poirot. This man was nothing but a name, a way to ensure all the carriage was booked by the conspirators and Ratchett and thus no outsider would interfere nor be affected by the murder. The reason why [=McQueen=] [=MacAueen=] is taken aback by Poirot's presence on the train is because no one was ''supposed'' to be there in the first place.
** And also because it throws a spanner into the plan; even if [=McQueen=] [=MacQueen=] isn't aware that he's now bunking with the greatest detective in the world, it's nevertheless someone else who could throw everything out of order.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC:FridgeHorror:]]
* What happened to the captain who stole the priceless relic and tried to frame three holy men after the mob got him? Given that three groups of people were on the verge of a riot because of the accusations against their religious leader and Peroit pointed out that the captain set them up to fall for his crime, they may have killed him if the guards couldn’t rescue him in time.

Top