Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Fridge / Frenzy1972

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** And, since Richard must have told his brief that Johnny and Hetty could vouch for him, it must stand to reason that ''he antagonised his own defence team'' so much that they didn't bother to put up much of a defence, as they could (and should) have forced the Porters to testify.

to:

** And, since Richard must have told his brief that Johnny and Hetty could vouch for him, it must stand to reason that ''he antagonised his own defence team'' so much that they didn't bother to put up much of a defence, as they could (and should) have forced the Porters either or both of them to testify.

Changed: 122

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As far as the trial is concerned, it makes Hetty even more of a {{Jerkass}} as she could have testified that Richard could not have killed Babs — but she evidently chose not to. This also makes Johnny appear as even more of a HenpeckedHusband as Hetty probably did not allow him to testify on Richard's behalf either.

to:

** As far as the trial is concerned, it makes Hetty even more of a {{Jerkass}} as she could have testified that provided an alibi for Richard could not have killed as he was at her place when Babs was murdered — but she evidently chose not to. This also makes Johnny appear as even more of a HenpeckedHusband as Hetty probably did not allow him to testify on Richard's behalf either.either, even though he knows that his friend didn't kill Babs.



* When Rusk meets Brenda, it's clear that he has been a client of her agency for some time and that she has had to blacklist him because some of the women she set him up with complained about his violent ways. Given that he has used a false name, one wonders if he had previously been a client under his own name beforehand. Even if that is not so, just how many women did Brenda connect him with — and how many of those [[KilledOffscreen never contacted her again]]?

to:

* When Rusk meets with Brenda, it's clear that he has been a client of her agency for some time and that she has had to blacklist him because some of the women she set him up with complained about his violent ways. Given that he has used a false name, one wonders if he had previously been a client under his own name beforehand. Even if that is not so, just how many women did Brenda connect him with — and how many of those [[KilledOffscreen never contacted her again]]?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Rusk may kill all of his victims in the same way, but from what we see he disposes of the bodies differently every time. This may be well be a reason why the police haven't caught him when the film starts; in the end, he's only caught because hd incriminates himself ''in the presence of'' Inspector Oxford.

to:

* Rusk may kill all of his victims in the same way, but from what we see he disposes of the bodies differently every time. This may be well be a reason why the police haven't caught him when the film starts; in the end, he's only caught because hd he incriminates himself ''in the presence of'' Inspector Oxford.

Changed: 310

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Rusk may kill all of his victims in the same way, but from what we see he disposes of the bodies differently every time. This may be well be a reason why the police haven't caught him when the film starts; in the end, he's only caught because hd incriminates himself ''in the presence of'' Inspector Oxford.

Changed: 137

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* When Rusk meets Brenda, it's clear that he has been a client of her agency for some time and that she has had to blacklist him because some of the women she set him up with complained about his violent ways. Just how many women did Brenda connect him with — and how many of those [[KilledOffscreen never contacted her again]]?

to:

* When Rusk meets Brenda, it's clear that he has been a client of her agency for some time and that she has had to blacklist him because some of the women she set him up with complained about his violent ways. Just Given that he has used a false name, one wonders if he had previously been a client under his own name beforehand. Even if that is not so, just how many women did Brenda connect him with — and how many of those [[KilledOffscreen never contacted her again]]?

Changed: 478

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As far as the trial is concerned, it makes Hetty even more of a {{Jerkass}} as she could have testified that Richard could not have killed Babs (or at least let Johnny give evidence in Richard's favour) — but she evidently chose not to.

to:

** As far as the trial is concerned, it makes Hetty even more of a {{Jerkass}} as she could have testified that Richard could not have killed Babs (or at least let Johnny give evidence in Richard's favour) — but she evidently chose not to.to. This also makes Johnny appear as even more of a HenpeckedHusband as Hetty probably did not allow him to testify on Richard's behalf either.
** And, since Richard must have told his brief that Johnny and Hetty could vouch for him, it must stand to reason that ''he antagonised his own defence team'' so much that they didn't bother to put up much of a defence, as they could (and should) have forced the Porters to testify.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As far as the trial is concerned, it makes Hetty even more of a {{Jerkass}} as she could have testified that Richard could not have killed Babs (or let Johnny do so) — but she evidently chose not to.

to:

** As far as the trial is concerned, it makes Hetty even more of a {{Jerkass}} as she could have testified that Richard could not have killed Babs (or at least let Johnny do so) give evidence in Richard's favour) — but she evidently chose not to.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** As far as the trial is concerned, it makes Hetty even more of a {{Jerkass}} as she could have testified that Richard could not have killed Babs — but she evidently chose not to.

to:

** As far as the trial is concerned, it makes Hetty even more of a {{Jerkass}} as she could have testified that Richard could not have killed Babs (or let Johnny do so) — but she evidently chose not to.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* When Rusk meets Brenda, it's clear that he has been a client of her agency for some time and that she has had to blacklist him because some of the women she set him up with complained about his violent ways. Just how many women did Brenda connect him with — and how many of those [[KilledOffscreen never got back in touch with her]]?

to:

* When Rusk meets Brenda, it's clear that he has been a client of her agency for some time and that she has had to blacklist him because some of the women she set him up with complained about his violent ways. Just how many women did Brenda connect him with — and how many of those [[KilledOffscreen never got back in touch with her]]?contacted her again]]?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* When Rusk meets Brenda, it's clear that he has been a client of her agency for some time and that she has had to blacklist him because some of the women she set him up with complained about his violent ways. Just how many women did Brenda connect him with — and how many of those never got back in touch with her?

to:

* When Rusk meets Brenda, it's clear that he has been a client of her agency for some time and that she has had to blacklist him because some of the women she set him up with complained about his violent ways. Just how many women did Brenda connect him with — and how many of those [[KilledOffscreen never got back in touch with her?her]]?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Richard is not just arrested for being the Necktie Killer, he's ''tried and convicted''. His unpleasantness is such that, faced with a prosecution barrister presenting evidence against him that was circumstantial at best, a jury decided to convict him.

to:

* Richard is not just arrested for being the Necktie Killer, he's ''tried and convicted''. His unpleasantness is such that, faced with a prosecution barrister presenting evidence against him that was circumstantial at best, a jury nevertheless decided to convict him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC:FridgeBrilliance]]
* Richard is not just arrested for being the Necktie Killer, he's ''tried and convicted''. His unpleasantness is such that, faced with a prosecution barrister presenting evidence against him that was circumstantial at best, a jury decided to convict him.
** As far as the trial is concerned, it makes Hetty even more of a {{Jerkass}} as she could have testified that Richard could not have killed Babs — but she evidently chose not to.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC:FridgeHorror]]
* When Rusk meets Brenda, it's clear that he has been a client of her agency for some time and that she has had to blacklist him because some of the women she set him up with complained about his violent ways. Just how many women did Brenda connect him with — and how many of those never got back in touch with her?

Top