Follow TV Tropes

Following

History FairForItsDay / Literature

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/CudjosCave'' is a powerful and nuanced antislavery and anti-Confederacy tale that is far ahead of its time in condemning the attitudes behind secession and having the non-stereotypical Pomp be an assertive and powerful black man who fights back against white abusers, acts as an authority figure to several of his white abolitionist allies, and survives, but the native African Cudjo is the subject of some CondescendingCompassion, even from Pomp, for his tribal religious beliefs, [[spoiler:and fails to survive the book]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Example does not sufficiently explain how it applies This only explains why it's bad by contemporary standards, not why it's fair for the early 90s.


* The 1994 Olivia Goldsmith novel ''Flavor of the Month'' has the big twist of the revelation one of the starlets of a hot female-led TV show was born a man (their mother having long hid it from the world). It's revealed when she's shot and when her fiancée (who, amazingly, has never discovered the truth himself) identifies himself, the doctor openly scoff "that patient cannot be your fiancée." It's treated as the biggest scandal in Hollywood history with [[spoiler: that character's funeral]] surrounded by drag queens. Today, a doctor (especially a Hollywood one) wouldn't blink twice at a man claiming a man is his fiancée and transgender actors more accepted than they were in the early '90s.

to:

* %%* The 1994 Olivia Goldsmith novel ''Flavor of the Month'' has the big twist of the revelation one of the starlets of a hot female-led TV show was born a man (their mother having long hid it from the world). It's revealed when she's shot and when her fiancée (who, amazingly, has never discovered the truth himself) identifies himself, the doctor openly scoff "that patient cannot be your fiancée." It's treated as the biggest scandal in Hollywood history with [[spoiler: that character's funeral]] surrounded by drag queens. Today, a doctor (especially a Hollywood one) wouldn't blink twice at a man claiming a man is his fiancée and transgender actors more accepted than they were in the early '90s.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:

Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/GodEmperorOfDune'': Duncan Idaho says some shockingly homophobic things that definitely echo Frank Herbert's own views on the subject (Duncan is outright disgusted that the Fish Speakers are lesbians). But despite that, they're portrayed as a relic of the era when the original Duncan lived, with the present view being that same-sex relationships are unusual but nothing to get upset about.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** While Heinlein's female characters were generally strong, and three-dimensional in their characterization, by the standards of mid-20th Century writers, there was still a fair bit of sexism baked into them. Most of Heinlein's female characters find happiness through marriage, and can be very dependant on the story's male lead. He stated many times in his works that [[MarsAndVenusGenderContrast men and women are different psychologically]], and that there's nothing wrong with that. Considering he wrote most of his works prior to Second Wave Feminism, his female characters can be astonishingly progessive. Still, it's jarring in ''Literature/TimeEnoughForLove'' when every female character who encounters Lazarus Long considers herself a failure as a woman when he rejects her sexual advances.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The hero of ''Literature/StarshipTroopers'' is revealed to be Filipino, and the heroine of ''Literature/PodkayneOfMars'' is part Maori.

to:

** The hero of ''Literature/StarshipTroopers'' is revealed to be Filipino, Filipino (in almost the last sentence of the novel, but it still probably raised eyebrows just the same), and the heroine of ''Literature/PodkayneOfMars'' is part Maori.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Archived dead link


** The stories of Conan the Barbarian were remarkably diverse in terms of race for the 1930s era (just look at this [[https://sites.google.com/site/hyboriantales/_/rsrc/1233763136342/map-of-the-hyborian-age/map-of-the-hyborian-age/hyboria.gif map from the Hyboria Age]]), with many non-white characters who were both Conan's allies and enemies.

to:

** The stories of Conan the Barbarian were remarkably diverse in terms of race for the 1930s era (just look at this [[https://sites.[[https://web.archive.org/web/20201016205512/https://sites.google.com/site/hyboriantales/_/rsrc/1233763136342/map-of-the-hyborian-age/map-of-the-hyborian-age/hyboria.gif map from the Hyboria Age]]), with many non-white characters who were both Conan's allies and enemies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
General clarification on works content; Transmedicalism still exists, its just less mainstream or popular (for lack of a better term) than it once was


* ''Literature/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'' centered on a CreepyCrossdresser serial killer who murders and skins women to make himself a woman suit. However, both the book and the film try to distinguish between real transgender people and the villain, who only ''thinks'' he's transgender due to his own self-hatred, and go out of their way to point out that most transgender people are normal, decent people who have no unusual inclination towards violence. The doctor Crawford goes to for help finding Buffalo Bill gives a passionate speech about how trans people are just people who deserve gender-affirming care (although that's not what he calls it), and associating the clinic with Buffalo Bill will set back their advocacy for trans acceptance by years. One of the ways Lecter suggests for finding a description or photograph of the killer is to look at people who both faked their identity, and were turned down for gender-affirming care for psychological reasons; the former because a criminal record for almost anything (besides, well, charges based upon them cross-dressing) disqualifies the applicant (and both Lecter and the FBI agree that Buffalo Bill almost certainly had one), and the latter because, well, there was no way that anyone as disturbed as Buffalo Bill was going to pass a psychological test of any kind (and even if he weren't disturbed, wouldn't register as actually trans per the test's terms). They all use outdated language and take a more medical view than people nowadays do, but they're sincere.

to:

* ''Literature/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'' centered on a CreepyCrossdresser serial killer who murders and skins women to make himself a woman suit. However, both the book and the film try to distinguish between real transgender people and the villain, who only ''thinks'' he's transgender due to his own self-hatred, and go out of their way to point out that most transgender people are normal, decent people who have no unusual inclination towards violence. The doctor Crawford goes to for help finding Buffalo Bill gives a passionate speech about how trans people are just people who deserve gender-affirming care (although that's not what he calls it), and associating the clinic with Buffalo Bill will set back their advocacy for trans acceptance by years. One of the ways Lecter suggests for finding a description or photograph of the killer is to look at people who both faked their identity, and were turned down for gender-affirming care for psychological reasons; the former because a criminal record for almost anything (besides, well, charges based upon them cross-dressing) disqualifies the applicant (and both Lecter and the FBI agree that Buffalo Bill almost certainly had one), and the latter because, well, there was no way that anyone as disturbed as Buffalo Bill was going to pass a psychological test of any kind (and even if he weren't disturbed, wouldn't register as actually trans per the test's terms). They all use outdated language and take a more medical view than most people nowadays would do, but they're sincere.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Literature/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'' centered on a CreepyCrossdresser serial killer who murders and skins women to make himself a woman suit. However, both the book and the film try to distinguish between real transgender people and the villain, who only ''thinks'' he's transgender due to his own self-hatred, and go out of their way to point out that most transgender people are normal, decent people who have no unusual inclination towards violence. The doctor Crawford goes to for help finding Buffalo Bill gives a passionate speech about how trans people are just people who deserve gender-affirming care (although that's not what he calls it), and associating the clinic with with Buffalo Bill will set back their advocacy for trans acceptance by years. One of the ways Lecter suggests for finding a description or photograph of the killer is to look at people who both faked their identity, and were turned down for gender-affirming care for psychological reasons; the former because a criminal record for almost anything (besides, well, charges based upon them cross-dressing) disqualifies the applicant (and both Lecter and the FBI agree that Buffalo Bill almost certainly had one), and the latter because, well, there was no way that anyone as disturbed as Buffalo Bill was going to pass a psychological test of any kind (and even if he weren't disturbed, wouldn't register as actually trans per the test's terms). They all use outdated language and take a more medical view than people nowadays do, but they're sincere.

to:

* ''Literature/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'' centered on a CreepyCrossdresser serial killer who murders and skins women to make himself a woman suit. However, both the book and the film try to distinguish between real transgender people and the villain, who only ''thinks'' he's transgender due to his own self-hatred, and go out of their way to point out that most transgender people are normal, decent people who have no unusual inclination towards violence. The doctor Crawford goes to for help finding Buffalo Bill gives a passionate speech about how trans people are just people who deserve gender-affirming care (although that's not what he calls it), and associating the clinic with with Buffalo Bill will set back their advocacy for trans acceptance by years. One of the ways Lecter suggests for finding a description or photograph of the killer is to look at people who both faked their identity, and were turned down for gender-affirming care for psychological reasons; the former because a criminal record for almost anything (besides, well, charges based upon them cross-dressing) disqualifies the applicant (and both Lecter and the FBI agree that Buffalo Bill almost certainly had one), and the latter because, well, there was no way that anyone as disturbed as Buffalo Bill was going to pass a psychological test of any kind (and even if he weren't disturbed, wouldn't register as actually trans per the test's terms). They all use outdated language and take a more medical view than people nowadays do, but they're sincere.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* R.A. Salvatore's ''Literature/TheLegendOfDrizzt'' not only [[SeinfeldIsUnfunny set off loads of cliches]], but it portrayed a character who was a member of an "Evil" race (ordinarily just villainous mooks) as a person. However, these days others point out that in-universe, almost every other drow are AlwaysChaoticEvil xenophobes, and Drizzt simply not being that way makes him come off as either "One of the good ones", or implying that it's the Drow ''culture'' that's bad - both sentiments are considered ''quite'' racist during TheNewTwenties.

to:

* R.A. Salvatore's ''Literature/TheLegendOfDrizzt'' not only [[SeinfeldIsUnfunny [[OnceOriginalNowCommon set off loads of cliches]], but it portrayed a character who was a member of an "Evil" race (ordinarily just villainous mooks) as a person. However, these days others point out that in-universe, almost every other drow are AlwaysChaoticEvil xenophobes, and Drizzt simply not being that way makes him come off as either "One of the good ones", or implying that it's the Drow ''culture'' that's bad - both sentiments are considered ''quite'' racist during TheNewTwenties.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Renamed trope


** Howard wrote many stereotypical DistressedDamsel characters ([[ExecutiveMeddling usually at the insistence of his publishers -- it let artist Margaret Brundage paint sexy girls for the covers]]), he also managed to create several strong female characters -- Belit, Velaria, and Red Sonya in particular. Not to mention Dark Agnes de Chastillion, who could easily be considered one of the first FeministFantasy-characters.

to:

** Howard wrote many stereotypical DistressedDamsel DamselInDistress characters ([[ExecutiveMeddling usually at the insistence of his publishers -- it let artist Margaret Brundage paint sexy girls for the covers]]), he also managed to create several strong female characters -- Belit, Velaria, and Red Sonya in particular. Not to mention Dark Agnes de Chastillion, who could easily be considered one of the first FeministFantasy-characters.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In ''Literature/SpaceCadet'' one of the cadets accuses his classmates of being racist. They protest they don't have any negative feelings about one of their officers, who is black. "Don't be silly " is the reply; they don't have such feelings about their officer, who is, after all, human. He's talking about Venusians.

to:

** In ''Literature/SpaceCadet'' ''Literature/SpaceCadetHeinlein'', one of the cadets accuses his classmates of being racist. They protest they don't have any negative feelings about one of their officers, who is black. "Don't be silly " is the reply; they don't have such feelings about their officer, who is, after all, human. He's talking about Venusians.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Children's Books with LGBTQ+ Themes like Jenny Lives with Eric and Martin and Heather has Two Mommies existed long before Harry Potter was published, Section 28 was repealed years before she revealed Dumbledore was gay and it only directly affected local authorities and schools (not necessarily bookshops or othe businesses)


* Creator/JKRowling outing Dumbledore from ''Literature/HarryPotter'' as [[WordOfGay gay]] was this back in 2007, on a meta level. This was an era where homophobia was more present than today (same-sex marriage was still a rarity, for instance), and LGBT characters were still pretty rare in fiction aimed at children (and possibly illegal as well, under the infamous UK "clause 28", up until 2003). Nowadays, outing a character as gay with little to no indication of this in the text proper would feel like a cop-out. Not helped by the fact that later media depictions would mostly stick to the WordOfGay (or at best AmbiguouslyGay) approach, nor by J. K. Rowling's own transphobic comments in the 2020's.

to:

* %%* Creator/JKRowling outing Dumbledore from ''Literature/HarryPotter'' as [[WordOfGay gay]] was this back in 2007, on a meta level. This was an era where homophobia was more present than today (same-sex marriage was still a rarity, for instance), and LGBT characters were still pretty rare in fiction aimed at children (and possibly illegal as well, under the infamous UK "clause 28", up until 2003). Nowadays, outing a character as gay with little to no indication of this in the text proper would feel like a cop-out. Not helped by the fact that later media depictions would mostly stick to the WordOfGay (or at best AmbiguouslyGay) approach, nor by J. K. Rowling's own transphobic comments in the 2020's.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Some of her earlier stories in the same continuity, ''Literature/HeraldsOfValdemar'', feature the asexual Tarma. Tarma is asexual because she gave up that part of herself in a ritual so that she could pursue [[RapeAndRevenge revenge on the bandits who raped her and killed her clan]], and becoming asexual gives her a sense of armor against the pain - it encourages the misconception that asexuality is the result of sexual trauma. However, the first story starring Tarma was published in 1987 and there are plenty of good aspects too. She never feels incomplete or like she should change herself back, and her [[HeterosexualLifePartners extremely]] [[PseudoRomanticFriendship close]] [[ChastityCouple relationship]] with Kethry is also a very nice queerplatonic partnership.

to:

** Some of her earlier stories in the same continuity, ''Literature/HeraldsOfValdemar'', feature the asexual Tarma. Tarma is asexual because she gave up that part of herself in a ritual so that she could pursue [[RapeAndRevenge revenge on the bandits who raped her and killed her clan]], and becoming asexual gives her a sense of armor against the pain - it encourages the misconception that [[RapeAndSwitch asexuality is the result of sexual trauma.trauma]]. However, the first story starring Tarma was published in 1987 and there are plenty of good aspects too. She never feels incomplete or like she should change herself back, and her [[HeterosexualLifePartners extremely]] [[PseudoRomanticFriendship close]] [[ChastityCouple relationship]] with Kethry is also a very nice queerplatonic partnership.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Some of her earlier stories in the same continuity, ''Literature/HeraldsOfValdemar'', feature the asexual Tarma. Tarma is asexual because she gave up that part of herself in a ritual so that she could pursue [[RapeAndRevenge revenge on the bandits who raped her and killed her clan]], and becoming asexual gives her a sense of armor against the pain - it encourages the misconception that asexuality is the result of sexual trauma. However, the first story starring Tarma was published in 1987 and there are plenty of good aspects too. She never feels incomplete or like she should change herself back, and her [[HeterosexualLifePartners extremely]] [[PseudoRomanticFriendship close]] [[ChastityCouple relationship]] with Kethry is also a very nice queerplatonic partnership.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Creator/MercedesLackey's ''Literature/LastHeraldMageTrilogy'' has its lead character, Vanyel Ashkevron, suffering a great extremity of {{Gayngst}} and has a few confident statements to the tune that gay men are inherently CampGay from a young age. It also ends with a particular case of BuryYourGays where the gays in question AscendedToAHigherPlaneOfExistence on dying and [[AngelicTransformation pretty much become angels]]. The degree of anguish Vanyel suffers can read as overwrought these days, and that he has to make nice with a father who believes AllGaysArePedophiles can cause a wince. There's also some NoBisexuals going on. However! The first book of the trilogy came out in 1989 and Vanyel is both definitely attracted to men and tremendously, unquestionably sympathetic and heroic. For its day it was ''incredibly'' progressive and even today, when LGBTRepresentationInMedia is ''far'' more commonplace, it can resound.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/SomebodyOwesMeMoney'': Matt not minding that his friend Jerry is probably attracted to men in 1969 is decently progressive. The way that acceptance is implicitly dependent on Jerry only acting on those feelings out of sight of his poker buddies is more controversial.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
trope about IU colorism now


* ''Literature/AroundTheWorldIn80Days'': The book's protagonist, an Englishman, falls in love with and marries an Indian princess. Although Verne describes her as [[ButNotTooBlack fair skinned and notes that her English is perfect]], most likely as an excuse to make the pairing more acceptable to his 19th century audience, featuring an interracial marriage at all is still progressive for its time period.

to:

* ''Literature/AroundTheWorldIn80Days'': The book's protagonist, an Englishman, falls in love with and marries an Indian princess. Although Verne describes her as [[ButNotTooBlack fair skinned fair-skinned and notes that her English is perfect]], perfect, most likely as an excuse to make the pairing more acceptable to his 19th century audience, featuring an interracial marriage at all is still progressive for its time period.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
the name of the work must appears even if it's a famous one.


* Creator/JKRowling outing [[Literature/HarryPotter Dumbledore]] as [[WordOfGay gay]] was this back in 2007, on a meta level. This was an era where homophobia was more present than today (same-sex marriage was still a rarity, for instance), and LGBT characters were still pretty rare in fiction aimed at children (and possibly illegal as well, under the infamous UK "clause 28", up until 2003). Nowadays, outing a character as gay with little to no indication of this in the text proper would feel like a cop-out. Not helped by the fact that later media depictions would mostly stick to the WordOfGay (or at best AmbiguouslyGay) approach, nor by J. K. Rowling's own transphobic comments in the 2020's.

to:

* Creator/JKRowling outing [[Literature/HarryPotter Dumbledore]] Dumbledore from ''Literature/HarryPotter'' as [[WordOfGay gay]] was this back in 2007, on a meta level. This was an era where homophobia was more present than today (same-sex marriage was still a rarity, for instance), and LGBT characters were still pretty rare in fiction aimed at children (and possibly illegal as well, under the infamous UK "clause 28", up until 2003). Nowadays, outing a character as gay with little to no indication of this in the text proper would feel like a cop-out. Not helped by the fact that later media depictions would mostly stick to the WordOfGay (or at best AmbiguouslyGay) approach, nor by J. K. Rowling's own transphobic comments in the 2020's.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Literature/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'' centered on a CreepyCrossdresser serial killer who murders and skinswomen to make himself a woman suit. However, both the book and the film try to distinguish between real transgender people and the villain, who only ''thinks'' he's transgender due to his own self-hatred, and go out of their way to point out that most transgender people are normal, decent people who have no unusual inclination towards violence. The doctor Crawford goes to for help finding Buffalo Bill gives a passionate speech about how trans people are just people who deserve gender-affirming care (although that's not what he calls it), and associating the clinic with with Buffalo Bill will set back their advocacy for trans acceptance by years. One of the ways Lecter suggests for finding a description or photograph of the killer is to look at people who both faked their identity, and were turned down for gender-affirming care for psychological reasons; the former because a criminal record for almost anything (besides, well, charges based upon them cross-dressing) disqualifies the applicant (and both Lecter and the FBI agree that Buffalo Bill almost certainly had one), and the latter because, well, there was no way that anyone as disturbed as Buffalo Bill was going to pass a psychological test of any kind (and even if he weren't disturbed, wouldn't register as actually trans per the test's terms). They all use outdated language and take a more medical view than people nowadays do, but they're sincere.

to:

* ''Literature/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'' centered on a CreepyCrossdresser serial killer who murders and skinswomen skins women to make himself a woman suit. However, both the book and the film try to distinguish between real transgender people and the villain, who only ''thinks'' he's transgender due to his own self-hatred, and go out of their way to point out that most transgender people are normal, decent people who have no unusual inclination towards violence. The doctor Crawford goes to for help finding Buffalo Bill gives a passionate speech about how trans people are just people who deserve gender-affirming care (although that's not what he calls it), and associating the clinic with with Buffalo Bill will set back their advocacy for trans acceptance by years. One of the ways Lecter suggests for finding a description or photograph of the killer is to look at people who both faked their identity, and were turned down for gender-affirming care for psychological reasons; the former because a criminal record for almost anything (besides, well, charges based upon them cross-dressing) disqualifies the applicant (and both Lecter and the FBI agree that Buffalo Bill almost certainly had one), and the latter because, well, there was no way that anyone as disturbed as Buffalo Bill was going to pass a psychological test of any kind (and even if he weren't disturbed, wouldn't register as actually trans per the test's terms). They all use outdated language and take a more medical view than people nowadays do, but they're sincere.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Literature/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'' centered on a CreepyCrossdresser serial killer who [[spoiler:murdered and skinned women to make himself a woman suit]]. However, both the book and the film try to distinguish between real transgender people and the villain, who only ''thinks'' he's transgender due to his own self-hatred, and go out of their way to point out that most transgender people are normal, decent people who have no unusual inclination towards violence -- in fact, in the book, one of the ways Lecter suggests for finding a description or photograph of the killer is to look at people who both faked their identity to the surgeon, and were turned down for the surgery for psychological reasons; the former because a criminal record for almost anything (besides, well, charges based upon them cross-dressing) disqualifies the applicant (and both Lecter and the FBI agree that Buffalo Bill almost certainly had one), and the latter because, well, there was no way that anyone as disturbed as Buffalo Bill was going to pass a psychological test of any kind.

to:

* ''Literature/TheSilenceOfTheLambs'' centered on a CreepyCrossdresser serial killer who [[spoiler:murdered murders and skinned women skinswomen to make himself a woman suit]]. suit. However, both the book and the film try to distinguish between real transgender people and the villain, who only ''thinks'' he's transgender due to his own self-hatred, and go out of their way to point out that most transgender people are normal, decent people who have no unusual inclination towards violence -- in fact, in violence. The doctor Crawford goes to for help finding Buffalo Bill gives a passionate speech about how trans people are just people who deserve gender-affirming care (although that's not what he calls it), and associating the book, one clinic with with Buffalo Bill will set back their advocacy for trans acceptance by years. One of the ways Lecter suggests for finding a description or photograph of the killer is to look at people who both faked their identity to the surgeon, identity, and were turned down for the surgery gender-affirming care for psychological reasons; the former because a criminal record for almost anything (besides, well, charges based upon them cross-dressing) disqualifies the applicant (and both Lecter and the FBI agree that Buffalo Bill almost certainly had one), and the latter because, well, there was no way that anyone as disturbed as Buffalo Bill was going to pass a psychological test of any kind.kind (and even if he weren't disturbed, wouldn't register as actually trans per the test's terms). They all use outdated language and take a more medical view than people nowadays do, but they're sincere.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/JKRowling outing [[Literature/HarryPotter Dumbledore]] as [[WordOfGay gay]] was this back in 2007, on a meta level. This was an era where homophobia was more present than today (same-sex marriage was still a rarity, for instance), and LGBT characters were still pretty rare in fiction aimed at children (and possibly illegal as well, under the infamous UK "clause 28", up until 2003). Nowadays, outing a character as gay with little to no indication of this in the text proper would feel like a cop-out. Not helped by the fact that later media appearances would mostly stick to the WordOfGay (or at best AmbiguouslyGay) approach, nor by J. K. Rowling's own transphobic comments in the 2020's.

to:

* Creator/JKRowling outing [[Literature/HarryPotter Dumbledore]] as [[WordOfGay gay]] was this back in 2007, on a meta level. This was an era where homophobia was more present than today (same-sex marriage was still a rarity, for instance), and LGBT characters were still pretty rare in fiction aimed at children (and possibly illegal as well, under the infamous UK "clause 28", up until 2003). Nowadays, outing a character as gay with little to no indication of this in the text proper would feel like a cop-out. Not helped by the fact that later media appearances depictions would mostly stick to the WordOfGay (or at best AmbiguouslyGay) approach, nor by J. K. Rowling's own transphobic comments in the 2020's.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/JKRowling outing [[Literature/HarryPotter Dumbledore]] as [[WordOfGay gay]] was this back in 2007, on a meta level. This was an era where homophobia was more present than today (same-sex marriage was still a rarity, for instance), and LGBT characters were still pretty rare in fiction aimed at children (and possibly illegal as well, under the infamous UK "clause 28", up until 2003). Nowadays, outing a character as gay with little to no indication of this in the text proper would feel like a cop-out. Not helped by the fact that later media appearances would stick to the WordOfGay (or at best AmbiguouslyGay) approach, nor by J. K. Rowling's own transphobic comments in the 2020's.

to:

* Creator/JKRowling outing [[Literature/HarryPotter Dumbledore]] as [[WordOfGay gay]] was this back in 2007, on a meta level. This was an era where homophobia was more present than today (same-sex marriage was still a rarity, for instance), and LGBT characters were still pretty rare in fiction aimed at children (and possibly illegal as well, under the infamous UK "clause 28", up until 2003). Nowadays, outing a character as gay with little to no indication of this in the text proper would feel like a cop-out. Not helped by the fact that later media appearances would mostly stick to the WordOfGay (or at best AmbiguouslyGay) approach, nor by J. K. Rowling's own transphobic comments in the 2020's.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Creator/JKRowling outing [[Literature/HarryPotter Dumbledore]] as [[WordOfGay gay]] was this back in 2007, on a meta level. This was an era where homophobia was more present than today (same-sex marriage was still a rarity, for instance), and LGBT characters were still pretty rare in fiction aimed at children (and possibly illegal, under the infamous UK "clause 28", up until 2003). Nowadays, outing a character as gay with little to no indication of this in the text proper would feel like a cop-out. Not helped by the fact that later media appearances would stick to the WordOfGay (or at best AmbiguouslyGay) approach, nor by J. K. Rowling's own transphobic comments in the 2020's.

to:

* Creator/JKRowling outing [[Literature/HarryPotter Dumbledore]] as [[WordOfGay gay]] was this back in 2007, on a meta level. This was an era where homophobia was more present than today (same-sex marriage was still a rarity, for instance), and LGBT characters were still pretty rare in fiction aimed at children (and possibly illegal, illegal as well, under the infamous UK "clause 28", up until 2003). Nowadays, outing a character as gay with little to no indication of this in the text proper would feel like a cop-out. Not helped by the fact that later media appearances would stick to the WordOfGay (or at best AmbiguouslyGay) approach, nor by J. K. Rowling's own transphobic comments in the 2020's.

Top