Follow TV Tropes

Following

History EarlyInstallmentWeirdness / Film

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Correcting an inaccuracy with example.

Added DiffLines:

*** Although, Freddy does actually refer to himself as Freddy ("Come to Freddy...") at least once in the first movie. And Nancy calls him "Freddy" at least twice throughout the final showdown ("Come on, Freddy, can't you catch me?").
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

***This behavior returned in the prequel film ''RogueOne''


Added DiffLines:

***The more primitive Vader suit is also visible in ''RogueOne''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** On the CGI side of the library, their very first release, ''WesternAnimation/{{Antz}}'' is clearly aimed more towards older audiences, featuring mature themes, and petty swearing, among other things, while later DWA films are clearly aimed toward family audiences.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding film example to trope

Added DiffLines:

* The earliest ''Bowery Boys'' movies were still comedies, but had more serious plotlines, with a number of scenes being straightforward melodrama. It wasn't until the series gained traction that the movies became DenserAndWackier.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** On the subject of Pixar, ''Toy Story'' doesn't have their VanityPlate shown before the film (although it does appear after the credits). Instead, the Walt Disney Pictures logo, rather than fading to black, actually transitions into the movie proper, by having the camera pan away from the castle until it fades into the wallpaper of Andy's room.

to:

** On the subject of Pixar, ''Toy Story'' doesn't have their VanityPlate shown before the film (although it does appear after the credits). Instead, the Walt Disney Pictures logo, rather than fading to black, actually transitions into the movie proper, by having the camera pan away from the castle until it fades into the wallpaper of Andy's room. Retconned with the 3D re-release in 2009, as it opened with the current Disney logo ''and'' the Pixar logo.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Watching ''WesternAnimation/ToyStory'' 15 years after it was originally made, while the composition of the elements is still impressive, it is noticeable how certain textures (hair and fabric) are left rather ambiguous and that the faces of human characters other than Sid are often out of frame. This was due to the technology not yet being at point where it could render organic things realistically: it wasn't until ''WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles'' that they took the plunge and made a film about people. The film is also remarkably low-key compared to the bombastic flourishes of later films in the series.

to:

* Watching ''WesternAnimation/ToyStory'' 15 over 20 years after it was originally made, while the composition of the elements is still impressive, it is noticeable how certain textures (hair and fabric) are left rather ambiguous and that the faces of human characters other than Sid are often out of frame. This was due to the technology not yet being at point where it could render organic things realistically: it wasn't until ''WesternAnimation/TheIncredibles'' that they took the plunge and made a film about people. The film is also remarkably low-key compared to the bombastic flourishes of later films in the series.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Badass is no longer a trope.


* The original ''Film/TheEvilDead1981'' is more a {{Gorn}} horror film, rather than the horror comedy of ''Film/EvilDead2''. Also none of the other cabin members besides Linda is mentioned in the other films. Ash is far from the CatchPhrase spouting, BadAss and JerkAss we see in the sequels, instead being a rather bland FinalGirl played by a guy. The Necronomicon doesn't have that name and the look of it is completely different from the other films. And lastly, in a subtler example, the Deadites (which aren't named as such until the second movie) are originally just pissed off that the teenagers awoke them from their eons-long sleep, whereas in the sequels they implicitly want to TakeOverTheWorld.

to:

* The original ''Film/TheEvilDead1981'' is more a {{Gorn}} horror film, rather than the horror comedy of ''Film/EvilDead2''. Also none of the other cabin members besides Linda is mentioned in the other films. Ash is far from the CatchPhrase spouting, BadAss badass and JerkAss we see in the sequels, instead being a rather bland FinalGirl played by a guy. The Necronomicon doesn't have that name and the look of it is completely different from the other films. And lastly, in a subtler example, the Deadites (which aren't named as such until the second movie) are originally just pissed off that the teenagers awoke them from their eons-long sleep, whereas in the sequels they implicitly want to TakeOverTheWorld.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Disney/{{Maleficent}}'' started, or at least inspired, Creator/{{Disney}}'s trend of making LiveActionAdaptation's of their Franchise/DisneyAnimatedCanon. Despite this, it is extremely different from the other titles. ''Maleficent'' is obviously an AlternateUniverse PerspectiveFlip take on ''Disney/SleepingBeauty''. It contradicts the original film in location (Scotland instead of England), [[AdaptationNameChange names]] (Diablo's name, and all the fairies have different names, in ''Maleficent''), and most of all the characterization of both [[AdaptationalHeroism the title character]] and [[AdaptationalVillainy King Stefan]]. Starting with ''Film/{{Cinderella 2015}}'', the films instead became more straighter adaptations. They follow the original films more accurately while still being more realistic than the original's and having their fair share of differences.

Added: 353

Changed: 476

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Carrie Fisher's infamous trans-Atlantic accent ("slip through your fingers") as Princess Leia, which she seems to drop halfway through the first film. It can be passed over for Leia [[BriefAccentImitation imitating her captors]] who are mostly British actors.

to:

** Carrie Fisher's infamous trans-Atlantic accent ("slip through your fingers") as Princess Leia, which she seems to drop halfway through the first film. It can be passed over for Leia [[BriefAccentImitation imitating her captors]] who are mostly British actors. According to the lady herself, it was a goof on her part left over from her training in England - where she lapses into an English accent whenever she's asked to be angry.



* If your knowledge of ''{{Literature/Twilight}}'' comes from PopCulturalOsmosis, you'll find the first movie awfully strange. It's essentially a low-budget indie ([[SleeperHit a very successful one]]) and it feels like it. There are only the most basic special effects and it generally just feels "small". In contrast, the sequels had higher budgets, so they feel bigger and have a blockbuster "sheen" which the original lacked.

to:

* If your knowledge of ''{{Literature/Twilight}}'' comes from PopCulturalOsmosis, you'll find the first movie awfully strange. It's essentially a low-budget indie ([[SleeperHit a very successful one]]) and it feels like it. There are only the most basic special effects and it generally just feels "small". In contrast, the sequels had higher budgets, so they feel bigger and have a blockbuster "sheen" which the original lacked. The first film also features no gratuitous {{Fanservice}}.



** Mystique also disguises herself as a statue while the X-Men infiltrate Liberty Island. This is the only film in the series where she demonstrates the power to turn into inanimate objects.
** Halle Berry gives Storm a hint of an African accent in the first film. Realising that it didn't sound very good, she uses her normal voice in subsequent films.



*** Charles Xavier sometimes acts like a cocky, womanizing ditz (which is a sharp contrast compared to his ''much'' more subdued and mature persona later on), Magneto doesn't hesitate to use a gun if he likes to (whereas in the previous films, he sneers at firearms with disdain), Mystique has undergone {{Chickification}} so that she's Charles' WomanChild foster sister instead of a lethal FemmeFatale, and Beast is socially awkward with severe self-esteem issues--you wouldn't have expected that the confident politician in ''Film/XMenTheLastStand'' had started his adulthood as an introvert.

to:

*** Invoked, as the prequel versions of the characters display characteristics that they're implied to grow out of. Charles Xavier sometimes acts like a cocky, womanizing ditz (which is a sharp contrast compared to his ''much'' more subdued and mature persona later on), Magneto doesn't hesitate to use a gun if he likes to (whereas in the previous films, he sneers at firearms with disdain), Mystique has undergone {{Chickification}} so that she's Charles' WomanChild foster sister instead is more of a lethal FemmeFatale, shy shrinking violet who desires to fit in, and Beast is socially awkward with severe self-esteem issues--you wouldn't have expected that the confident politician in ''Film/XMenTheLastStand'' had started his adulthood as an introvert.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/TheBourneIdentity'' feels very different in tone to its sequels. ''Film/TheBourneSupremacy'' and ''Film/TheBourneUltimatum'' are contiguous to the point that there is no time-cut at all between the last scenes of the second film and the first scenes of the third film (not counting the Bourne-in-New-York-scene, a ''Supremacy'' note which is "also" tied up in ''Ultimatum''...). But when you have recently seen ''Supremacy'' and/or ''Ultimatum'', it can come as a bit of a shock to rewatch ''Identity'' and realise how different it is, though it was setting up all the Bourne tropes the later films played on. Notably, the soundtrack is a very different beast, employing techno-ish and poppy background music. Damon's Bourne is also surprisingly chatty and smiley compared to his later silent stoicism. The editing takes a different approach completely, and the camera work is free of the JitterCam that defined the sequels. Most of this change in tone has to do with the first film being made by a different director to its sequels.

to:

* ''Film/TheBourneIdentity'' feels very different in tone to its sequels. ''Film/TheBourneSupremacy'' and ''Film/TheBourneUltimatum'' are contiguous to the point that there is no time-cut at all between the last scenes of the second film and the first scenes of the third film (not counting the Bourne-in-New-York-scene, a ''Supremacy'' note which is "also" also tied up in ''Ultimatum''...). But when you have recently seen ''Supremacy'' and/or ''Ultimatum'', it can come as a bit of a shock to rewatch ''Identity'' and realise how different it is, though it was setting up all the Bourne tropes the later films played on. Notably, the soundtrack is a very different beast, employing techno-ish and poppy background music. Damon's Bourne is also surprisingly chatty and smiley compared to his later silent stoicism. The editing takes a different approach completely, and the camera work is free of the JitterCam that defined the sequels. Most of this change in tone has to do with the first film being made by a different director to its sequels.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The 1954 film ''Film/{{Gojira}}'', which kick-started the ''Franchise/{{Godzilla}}'' franchise, is a surprisingly dark (and seriously scary) horror film rather than a campy monster movie. Because Godzilla is the only monster appearing in the film, the focus is on the humans' response to his rampage rather than on a battle between opposing monsters. Also, Godzilla is a metaphor for the horror of nuclear weapons and is unambiguously presented a villainous monster incapable of reason or sympathy, rather than the NobleDemon and defender of humanity that he evolved into as the series went on.

to:

* The 1954 film ''Film/{{Gojira}}'', ''Film/Godzilla1954'', which kick-started the ''Franchise/{{Godzilla}}'' franchise, is a surprisingly dark (and seriously scary) horror film rather than a campy monster movie. Because Godzilla is the only monster appearing in the film, the focus is on the humans' response to his rampage rather than on a battle between opposing monsters. Also, Godzilla is a metaphor for the horror of nuclear weapons and is unambiguously presented a villainous monster incapable of reason or sympathy, rather than the NobleDemon and defender of humanity that he evolved into as the series went on.

Added: 264

Changed: 848

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It also claims Tony Stark is only in his 20s. Later films would establish him to be at least a decade or more older than that.

to:

** It also claims Tony Stark is much younger than he seems - it's mentioned he took over his father's company at 21, and afterwards helped build Stark Industries as a giant. Only in later movies that date was established as 1991, making Tony only in his 20s. Later films would establish him to be at least a decade or more older 5 years younger than that.Creator/RobertDowneyJr.



** Creator/RogerMoore in his [[Film/LiveAndLetDie first outing]] as Bond is much colder and darker than the comedic tone he would be remembered for.

to:

** Creator/RogerMoore in his [[Film/LiveAndLetDie first outing]] as Bond is much colder and darker than the comedic tone he would be remembered for. [[Film/TheManWithTheGoldenGun His second]] is still on the way, with Moore admitting scenes such as Bond interrogating a woman by nearly breaking her arm felt like they were still writing for Creator/SeanConnery.



* The first ''Film/MadMax'' movie is very different from those that followed. It is not postapocalyptic, and Max spends most of it as a happily married family man with wife, child and job rather than the lone nomadic warrior of the wastelands he later becomes. The film is also very [[ToneShift different in tone]], relying more on slowly building suspense with only occasional, brief action sequences.

to:

* The first ''Film/MadMax'' movie is very different from those that followed. It is [[JustBeforeTHeEnd not postapocalyptic, postapocalyptic]], and Max spends most of it as a happily married family man with wife, child and job rather than the lone nomadic warrior of the wastelands he later becomes. The film is also very [[ToneShift different in tone]], relying more on slowly building suspense with only occasional, brief action sequences.



* The first ''Film/MissionImpossible'' film: Despite the movie being the TropeNamer for MissionImpossibleCableDrop. which in turn would set the bar for the high concept scenes and stunts of the sequels, the first film is VERY different in tone from them. There's very little in terms of action scenes until the end - even the titular MissionImpossibleCableDrop scene is more tension than action or complex stunts. Ethan's character doesn't have that "larger than life" reputation and presentation the other films give him. It's a much more quiet and psychological film whose tone does clash with its sequels, who would become more known for their action and stunts, when watching the series back to back.

to:

* The first ''Film/MissionImpossible'' film: Despite the movie being the TropeNamer for MissionImpossibleCableDrop. MissionImpossibleCableDrop, which in turn would set the bar for the high concept scenes and stunts of the sequels, the first film is VERY different in tone from them. There's very little in terms of action scenes until the end - even the titular MissionImpossibleCableDrop cable drop scene is more tension than action or complex stunts. Ethan's character doesn't have that "larger than life" reputation and presentation the other films give him. It's a much more quiet and psychological film whose tone does clash with its sequels, who would become more known for their action and stunts, when watching the series back to back. (helps the first was made by thriller expert Creator/BrianDePalma, while from the second onward the series went for action-based directors)



** Carrie Fisher's infamous trans-Atlantic accent ("slip through your fingers") as Princess Leia, which she seems to drop halfway through the first film.

to:

** Carrie Fisher's infamous trans-Atlantic accent ("slip through your fingers") as Princess Leia, which she seems to drop halfway through the first film. It can be passed over for Leia [[BriefAccentImitation imitating her captors]] who are mostly British actors.



* The [[Film/TheTerminator first]] ''Franchise/{{Terminator}}'' film is really weird compared to the ones that follow. Chief amongst the differences is that it's a Horror-Action hybrid with much greater emphasis on the Horror. It also has a much lower budget than the rest of the films, making it look somewhat dated in special effects. And finally, the TimeTravel plot mechanic uses a very closed and fatalistic StableTimeLoop while the rest of the movies run amuck with the TimeyWimeyBall.

to:

* The [[Film/TheTerminator first]] ''Franchise/{{Terminator}}'' film is really weird compared to the ones that follow. Chief amongst the differences is that it's a Horror-Action hybrid with much greater emphasis which borders on the Horror.SlasherFilm. It also has a much lower budget than the rest of the films, making it look somewhat dated in special effects. And finally, the TimeTravel plot mechanic uses a very closed and fatalistic StableTimeLoop while the rest of the movies run amuck with the TimeyWimeyBall.



** The first movie has Mystique barely speaking (she'd have plenty to talk in all her next appearances), and Sabretooth is a TerseTalker [[TheBrute Brute]] - a huge contrast to the ManipulativeBastard version Liev Schrieber played in ''Film/XMenOriginsWolverine''.



*** Creator/MichaelFassbender's Magneto alternates between sounding ambiguously British and Irish in various scenes. Essentially Fassbender's NotEvenBotheringWithTheAccent. The film was envisioned as a ContinuityReboot, unconnected to the previous ones. In the [[Film/XMenDaysOfFuturePast next movie]], which features CanonWelding with the series, Fassbender matches his accent with that of Ian [=McKellen=]'s Magneto.

to:

*** Creator/MichaelFassbender's Magneto alternates between sounding ambiguously British and Irish in various scenes. Essentially Fassbender's NotEvenBotheringWithTheAccent. The film was envisioned as a ContinuityReboot, [[BroadStrokes mostly]] unconnected to the previous ones. In the [[Film/XMenDaysOfFuturePast next movie]], which features CanonWelding with the series, Fassbender matches his accent with that of Ian [=McKellen=]'s Creator/IanMcKellen's Magneto.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The original ''ThePinkPanther'' from 1963 was written to be about the thieves rather than Inspector Clouseau. It was in the sequel, ''A Shot in the Dark'', where [[BreakoutCharacter the series shifted to focus on Clouseau]], and the recurring characters Cato and Dreyfuss were introduced.

to:

* The original ''ThePinkPanther'' from 1963 ''Film/ThePinkPanther1963'' was written to be about the thieves rather than Inspector Clouseau. It was in the sequel, ''A Shot in the Dark'', ''Film/AShotInTheDark'', where [[BreakoutCharacter the series shifted to focus on Clouseau]], and the recurring characters Cato and Dreyfuss were introduced.



* The original ''Film/TheProducers'', being Mel Brooks' first movie, is a bit straight-forward compared to his later comedies.

to:

* The original ''Film/TheProducers'', being Mel Brooks' Creator/MelBrooks' first movie, is a bit straight-forward compared to his later comedies.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* While there's technically only three "installments" in ''Film/ThePurge'' so far, the [[SequelHook sequel hooks]] in [[Film/ThePurgeAnarchy the second film]] all indicate that future additions will follow its lead. This means that a ''Purge'' movie about wealthy people, with a cast made up almost entirely of white actors, will stick out like a sore thumb.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Among DreamWorksAnimation's first films, ''WesternAnimation/ThePrinceOfEgypt'', ''WesternAnimation/TheRoadToElDorado'', ''WesternAnimation/SpiritStallionOfTheCimarron'' and ''WesternAnimation/SinbadLegendOfTheSevenSeas'' had 2-D animation instead of the now-omnipresent CGI. Also, ''Prince'' and ''Spirit'' were serious dramas, and ''Prince'' and ''Road'' are Disney-style musicals, both in stark comparison to the zaniness they developed by ''WesternAnimation/{{Shrek}}'' (even if later franchises like ''WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda'' and ''WesternAnimation/HowToTrainYourDragon'' showed that they could still be a litle more serious when called for).

to:

* Among DreamWorksAnimation's first films, ''WesternAnimation/ThePrinceOfEgypt'', ''WesternAnimation/TheRoadToElDorado'', ''WesternAnimation/SpiritStallionOfTheCimarron'' and ''WesternAnimation/SinbadLegendOfTheSevenSeas'' had 2-D animation instead of the now-omnipresent CGI. Also, ''Prince'' and ''Spirit'' were serious dramas, and ''Prince'' and ''Road'' are Disney-style musicals, both in stark comparison to the zaniness they developed by ''WesternAnimation/{{Shrek}}'' (even if later franchises like ''WesternAnimation/KungFuPanda'' and ''WesternAnimation/HowToTrainYourDragon'' showed that they could still be a litle little more serious when called for).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Charles Xavier sometimes acts like a cocky, womanizing ditz (which is a sharp contrast compared to his ''much'' more subdued and mature persona later on), Magneto doesn't hesitate to use a gun if he likes to (whereas in the previous films, he sneers at firearms with disdain), Mystique has undergone {{Chickification}} so that she's Charles' WomanChild sister instead of a lethal FemmeFatale, and Beast is socially awkward with severe self-esteem issues--you wouldn't have expected that the confident politician in ''Film/XMenTheLastStand'' had started his adulthood as an introvert.

to:

*** Charles Xavier sometimes acts like a cocky, womanizing ditz (which is a sharp contrast compared to his ''much'' more subdued and mature persona later on), Magneto doesn't hesitate to use a gun if he likes to (whereas in the previous films, he sneers at firearms with disdain), Mystique has undergone {{Chickification}} so that she's Charles' WomanChild foster sister instead of a lethal FemmeFatale, and Beast is socially awkward with severe self-esteem issues--you wouldn't have expected that the confident politician in ''Film/XMenTheLastStand'' had started his adulthood as an introvert.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The first ''{{Literature/Divergent}}'' film has Tris narrating the beginning and end portions. Starting with the second film, the series abandons this element.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Actually, there was only a two-year gap between Identity and Supremacy


* ''Film/TheBourneIdentity'' feels very different in tone to its sequels. ''Film/TheBourneSupremacy'' and ''Film/TheBourneUltimatum'' are contiguous to the point that there is no time-cut at all between the last scenes of the second film and the first scenes of the third film (not counting the Bourne-in-New-York-scene, a ''Supremacy'' note which is "also" tied up in ''Ultimatum''...). But when you have recently seen ''Supremacy'' and/or ''Ultimatum'', it can come as a bit of a shock to rewatch ''Identity'' and realise how different it is, though it was setting up all the Bourne tropes the later films played on. Notably, the soundtrack is a very different beast, employing techno-ish and poppy background music. Damon's Bourne is also surprisingly chatty and smiley compared to his later silent stoicism. The editing takes a different approach completely, and the camera work is free of the JitterCam that defined the sequels. Most of this change in tone has to do with the first film being made by a different director to its sequels, and the fact that there was several years' gap between its release and the release of its first sequel.

to:

* ''Film/TheBourneIdentity'' feels very different in tone to its sequels. ''Film/TheBourneSupremacy'' and ''Film/TheBourneUltimatum'' are contiguous to the point that there is no time-cut at all between the last scenes of the second film and the first scenes of the third film (not counting the Bourne-in-New-York-scene, a ''Supremacy'' note which is "also" tied up in ''Ultimatum''...). But when you have recently seen ''Supremacy'' and/or ''Ultimatum'', it can come as a bit of a shock to rewatch ''Identity'' and realise how different it is, though it was setting up all the Bourne tropes the later films played on. Notably, the soundtrack is a very different beast, employing techno-ish and poppy background music. Damon's Bourne is also surprisingly chatty and smiley compared to his later silent stoicism. The editing takes a different approach completely, and the camera work is free of the JitterCam that defined the sequels. Most of this change in tone has to do with the first film being made by a different director to its sequels, and the fact that there was several years' gap between its release and the release of its first sequel.sequels.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Charles Xavier sometimes acts like a cocky, womanizing ditz (which is a sharp contrast compared to his ''much'' more subdued and mature persona later on) and Magneto doesn't hesitate to use a gun if he likes to (whereas in the previous films, he sneers at firearms with disdain).

to:

*** Charles Xavier sometimes acts like a cocky, womanizing ditz (which is a sharp contrast compared to his ''much'' more subdued and mature persona later on) and on), Magneto doesn't hesitate to use a gun if he likes to (whereas in the previous films, he sneers at firearms with disdain).disdain), Mystique has undergone {{Chickification}} so that she's Charles' WomanChild sister instead of a lethal FemmeFatale, and Beast is socially awkward with severe self-esteem issues--you wouldn't have expected that the confident politician in ''Film/XMenTheLastStand'' had started his adulthood as an introvert.

Added: 3362

Changed: 2036

Removed: 1618

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Franchise/ANightmareOnElmStreet''
** The first two films are much darker and more serious than the later sequels. Before [[Film/ANightmareOnElmStreet3DreamWarriors the third film]], Freddy Krueger was very much a monster, and he wasn't [[FauxAffablyEvil the least bit humorous]]; when he did speak, it was meant to scare his victims rather than have a laugh at their expense. The early films also have some strange quirks of their own:
** In [[Film/ANightmareOnElmStreet1984 the first film]], the characters and the credits identify the killer strictly as ''Fred'' Krueger (he's only called "Freddy" in the IronicNurseryTune), he only kills four people, and it wraps up with a GainaxEnding that raises the question of just how much of the film was real versus what was in Nancy's head.
** The second film, ''[[Film/ANightmareOnElmStreetPart2FreddysRevenge Freddy's Revenge]]'', is even weirder. The plot revolves around Freddy possessing a teenage boy (complete with a BodyHorror-filled [[TransformationOfThePossessed transformation scene]]) in order to re-enter the real world, something that never comes up again in later films. It also has mountains of HomoeroticSubtext in the protagonist Jesse's character, his "relationship" with Freddy, and some of the kills (most infamously the gym coach's death).
* For a monster that is now-infamous for its blinding-fast speed, the first ''Film/{{Alien}}'' is shown almost exclusively moving slowly and ominously. We only see it move quickly for brief instants when it strikes, just before the shot cuts away. Later films in the series establish the aliens hustling about.



* The first ''Film/MissionImpossible'' film: Despite the movie being the TropeNamer for MissionImpossibleCableDrop. which in turn would set the bar for the high concept scenes and stunts of the sequels, the first film is VERY different in tone from them. There's very little in terms of action scenes until the end - even the titular MissionImpossibleCableDrop scene is more tension than action or complex stunts. Ethan's character doesn't have that "larger than life" reputation and presentation the other films give him. It's a much more quiet and psychological film whose tone does clash with its sequels, who would become more known for their action and stunts, when watching the series back to back.
* ''Franchise/ANightmareOnElmStreet''
** The first two films are much darker and more serious than the later sequels. Before [[Film/ANightmareOnElmStreet3DreamWarriors the third film]], Freddy Krueger was very much a monster, and he wasn't [[FauxAffablyEvil the least bit humorous]]; when he did speak, it was meant to scare his victims rather than have a laugh at their expense. The early films also have some strange quirks of their own:
** In [[Film/ANightmareOnElmStreet1984 the first film]], the characters and the credits identify the killer strictly as ''Fred'' Krueger (he's only called "Freddy" in the IronicNurseryTune), he only kills four people, and it wraps up with a GainaxEnding that raises the question of just how much of the film was real versus what was in Nancy's head.
** The second film, ''[[Film/ANightmareOnElmStreetPart2FreddysRevenge Freddy's Revenge]]'', is even weirder. The plot revolves around Freddy possessing a teenage boy (complete with a BodyHorror-filled [[TransformationOfThePossessed transformation scene]]) in order to re-enter the real world, something that never comes up again in later films. It also has mountains of HomoeroticSubtext in the protagonist Jesse's character, his "relationship" with Freddy, and some of the kills (most infamously the gym coach's death).
* For a monster that is now-infamous for its blinding-fast speed, the first ''Film/{{Alien}}'' is shown almost exclusively moving slowly and ominously. We only see it move quickly for brief instants when it strikes, just before the shot cuts away. Later films in the series establish the aliens hustling about.



* Kitty Pryde (Shadowcat) appears in all three ''Film/{{X-Men}}'' films, is notably discussed in the US Senate in X1 and referenced by Xavier to the President of the United States in ''Film/{{X2|XMenUnited}}'', but her on-screen appearances are very brief, almost cameo-sized, and she's played by different actresses in each. In ''Film/XMenTheLastStand'', she finally becomes a main character with whole sequences from her perspective, and is portrayed by Creator/EllenPage. The first film also features a different actor as John Allerdyce (Pyro) in a brief cameo. John becomes a main character with a different, lasting actor for the next two films.
* In ''Film/XMenFirstClass'' Michael Fassbender's Magneto alternates between sounding ambiguously British and Irish in various scenes. Essentially Fassbender's NotEvenBotheringWithTheAccent. The film was envisioned as a ContinuityReboot, unconnected to the previous ones. In the [[Film/XMenDaysOfFuturePast next film]], which features CanonWelding with the series, Fassbender matches his accent with that of Ian [=McKellen=]'s Magneto.
* The first ''Film/MissionImpossible'' film: Despite the movie being the TropeNamer for MissionImpossibleCableDrop. which in turn would set the bar for the high concept scenes and stunts of the sequels, the first film is VERY different in tone from them. There's very little in terms of action scenes until the end - even the titular MissionImpossibleCableDrop scene is more tension than action or complex stunts. Ethan's character doesn't have that "larger than life" reputation and presentation the other films give him. It's a much more quiet and psychological film whose tone does clash with its sequels, who would become more known for their action and stunts, when watching the series back to back.

to:

* ''Film/XMen'':
**
Kitty Pryde (Shadowcat) appears in all three ''Film/{{X-Men}}'' films, is notably discussed in the US Senate in X1 ''[[Film/XMen1 X1]]'' and referenced by Xavier Professor X to the President of the United States in ''Film/{{X2|XMenUnited}}'', ''Film/X2XMenUnited'', but her on-screen appearances are very brief, almost cameo-sized, she only had cameos and she's was played by two different actresses in each. actresses. In ''Film/XMenTheLastStand'', she finally becomes a main an important character with whole sequences from her perspective, that are centered around her, and is portrayed by Creator/EllenPage. Creator/EllenPage.
**
The first film also features a different actor as John Allerdyce (Pyro) in a brief cameo. John later becomes a main character with a different, lasting actor for and is played by Aaron Stanford in the next two films.
* In ''Film/XMenFirstClass'' Michael Fassbender's
movies.
** ''Film/XMenFirstClass'':
*** Creator/MichaelFassbender's
Magneto alternates between sounding ambiguously British and Irish in various scenes. Essentially Fassbender's NotEvenBotheringWithTheAccent. The film was envisioned as a ContinuityReboot, unconnected to the previous ones. In the [[Film/XMenDaysOfFuturePast next film]], movie]], which features CanonWelding with the series, Fassbender matches his accent with that of Ian [=McKellen=]'s Magneto.
* The first ''Film/MissionImpossible'' film: Despite the movie being the TropeNamer for MissionImpossibleCableDrop. which in turn would set the bar for the high concept scenes and stunts of the sequels, the first film *** Charles Xavier sometimes acts like a cocky, womanizing ditz (which is VERY different in tone from them. There's very little in terms of action scenes until the end - even the titular MissionImpossibleCableDrop scene is a sharp contrast compared to his ''much'' more tension than action or complex stunts. Ethan's character subdued and mature persona later on) and Magneto doesn't have that "larger than life" reputation and presentation hesitate to use a gun if he likes to (whereas in the other films give him. It's a much more quiet and psychological film whose tone does clash previous films, he sneers at firearms with its sequels, disdain).
** ''Film/XMenApocalypse'': This prequel seeks to evoke this for the adolescent X-Men. Jean Grey is scared of her powers and isn't in control of them yet, Cyclops is a bad boy and isn't leadership material, Nightcrawler is afraid of his own shadow, and Storm is a morally dubious thief
who would become more known for their action and stunts, when watching sides with the series back to back.BigBad.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The first ''Franchise/{{Terminator}}'' film is really weird compared to the ones that follow. Chief amongst the differences is that it's a Horror-Action hybrid with much greater emphasis on the Horror. It also has a much lower budget than the rest of the films, making it look somewhat dated in special effects. And finally, the TimeTravel plot mechanic uses a very closed and fatalistic StableTimeLoop while the rest of the movies run amuck with the TimeyWimeyBall.

to:

* The first [[Film/TheTerminator first]] ''Franchise/{{Terminator}}'' film is really weird compared to the ones that follow. Chief amongst the differences is that it's a Horror-Action hybrid with much greater emphasis on the Horror. It also has a much lower budget than the rest of the films, making it look somewhat dated in special effects. And finally, the TimeTravel plot mechanic uses a very closed and fatalistic StableTimeLoop while the rest of the movies run amuck with the TimeyWimeyBall.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The first film in ''TheLandBeforeTime'' series films is actually the only one that is not a musical. It also has significantly higher animation quality and a much darker tone. ''Creator/DonBluth'', anyone?

to:

* The first film in ''TheLandBeforeTime'' ''WesternAnimation/TheLandBeforeTime'' series films is actually the only one that is not a musical. It also has significantly higher animation quality and a much darker tone. ''Creator/DonBluth'', anyone?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/TheBourneIdentity'' feels very different in tone to its sequels. ''Film/TheBourneSupremacy'' and ''Film/TheBourneUltimatum'' are contiguous to the point that there is no time-cut at all between the last scenes of the second film and the first scenes of the third film (not counting the Bourne-in-New-York-scene, a ''Supremacy'' note which is "also" tied up in ''Ultimatum''...). But when you have recently seen ''Supremacy'' and/or ''Ultimatum'', it can come as a bit of a shock to rewatch ''Identity'' and realise how different it is, though it was setting up all the Bourne tropes the later films played on. Notably, the soundtrack is a very different beast, employing techno-ish and poppy background music. Damon's Bourne is also surprisingly chatty and smiley compared to his later silent stoicism. The editing takes a different approach completely, and the camera work is free of the JitterCam that defined the sequels. Most of this change in tone has to do with he first film being made by a different director to its sequels, and the fact that there was several years' gap between its release and the release of its first sequel.

to:

* ''Film/TheBourneIdentity'' feels very different in tone to its sequels. ''Film/TheBourneSupremacy'' and ''Film/TheBourneUltimatum'' are contiguous to the point that there is no time-cut at all between the last scenes of the second film and the first scenes of the third film (not counting the Bourne-in-New-York-scene, a ''Supremacy'' note which is "also" tied up in ''Ultimatum''...). But when you have recently seen ''Supremacy'' and/or ''Ultimatum'', it can come as a bit of a shock to rewatch ''Identity'' and realise how different it is, though it was setting up all the Bourne tropes the later films played on. Notably, the soundtrack is a very different beast, employing techno-ish and poppy background music. Damon's Bourne is also surprisingly chatty and smiley compared to his later silent stoicism. The editing takes a different approach completely, and the camera work is free of the JitterCam that defined the sequels. Most of this change in tone has to do with he the first film being made by a different director to its sequels, and the fact that there was several years' gap between its release and the release of its first sequel.

Added: 114

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The first entry into the Franchise/MarvelCinematicUniverse, had a few issues which would be retconned out in later films, mostly regarding SHIELD. Agent Coulson introduces himself as being from the "Strategic Homeland Intervention Enforcement and Logistics Division," then saying they're "working on shortening the name." This suggests that it's a fairly new organization but was likely to ease in moviegoers who were unfamiliar with SHIELD, as later installments would show that SHIELD has been around for decades.

to:

** The first entry into the Franchise/MarvelCinematicUniverse, Franchise/MarvelCinematicUniverse had a few issues which would be retconned out in later films, mostly regarding SHIELD. Agent Coulson introduces himself as being from the "Strategic Homeland Intervention Enforcement and Logistics Division," then saying they're "working on shortening the name." This suggests that it's a fairly new organization but was likely to ease in moviegoers who were unfamiliar with SHIELD, as later installments would show that SHIELD has been around for decades.


Added DiffLines:

** Terrence Howard plays Lt. Colonel Rhodes, while Creator/DonCheadle would take the role for later Marvel films.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* For films in general, a lot of works from the 1920s and 1930s basically [[NoEnding abruptly cut off]] at the end. The movies are done but they feel like there's something missing. It took a while for more concrete finales to become common.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The 1954 film ''Film/{{Gojira}}'', which kick-started the ''Franchise/{{Godzilla}}'' franchise, is a surprisingly dark (and seriously scary) horror film rather than a campy monster movie. Because Godzilla is the only monster appearing in the film, the focus is on the humans' response to his rampage rather than on a battle between opposing monsters. Also, Godzilla is unambiguously presented as a villainous monster incapable of reason or sympathy, and definitely ''not'' as a NobleDemon and defender of humanity, as he evolved into as the series went on.

to:

* The 1954 film ''Film/{{Gojira}}'', which kick-started the ''Franchise/{{Godzilla}}'' franchise, is a surprisingly dark (and seriously scary) horror film rather than a campy monster movie. Because Godzilla is the only monster appearing in the film, the focus is on the humans' response to his rampage rather than on a battle between opposing monsters. Also, Godzilla is a metaphor for the horror of nuclear weapons and is unambiguously presented as a villainous monster incapable of reason or sympathy, and definitely ''not'' as a rather than the NobleDemon and defender of humanity, as humanity that he evolved into as the series went on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The original ''Film/DeathWish'' is a gritty, realistic, look at urban decay and out of control crime in major American cities during the era. The movie was such a hit largely because it embodied the feelings of many honest citizens at the time. In the end there is no dramatic showdown with the men who killed his wife and raped his daughter, they simply disappear into the city and Paul will never know who they were. There's little graphic violence, but what there is is very disturbing. Nothing in the movie could be defined as gratuitous. The sequels all follow all the cliches avoided in the original.

to:

* The original ''Film/DeathWish'' is a gritty, realistic, look at urban decay and out of control crime in major American cities during the era. The movie was such a hit largely because it embodied the feelings of many honest citizens at the time. In the end there is no dramatic showdown with the men who killed his wife and raped his daughter, they simply disappear into the city and Paul will never know who they were. There's little graphic violence, but what there is is very disturbing. Nothing in the movie could be defined as gratuitous. The When the schlocky production company Creator/CannonFilms bought the rights eight years later, they began releasing sequels all follow all the cliches avoided in the original. that were more or less exploitation and dumb 1980s-style revenge fantasy action films.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** On the subject of Pixar, ''Toy Story'' doesn't have their VanityPlate shown before the film (although it does appear after the credits). Instead, the Walt Disney Pictures logo, rather than fading to black, actually transitions into the movie proper, by having the camera pan away from the castle until it fades into the wallpaper of Andy's room.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There is also a {{leitmotif}} for the Death Star, which is not used in ''ReturnOfTheJedi''.

to:

** There is also a {{leitmotif}} for the Death Star, which is not used in ''ReturnOfTheJedi''.''Film/ReturnOfTheJedi''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The first ''Film/MissionImpossible'' film: Despite the movie being the TropeNamer for MissionImpossibleCableDrop. which in turn would set the bar for the high concept scenes and stunts of the sequels, the first film is VERY different in tone from them. There's very little in terms of action scenes until the end - even the titular MissionImpossibleCableDrop scene is more tension than action or complex stunts. Ethan's character doesn't have that "larger than life" reputation and presentation the other films give him. It's a much more quiet and psychological film whose tone does clash with its sequels, who would become more known for their action and stunts, when watching the series back to back.

Top