Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Characters / NineteenEightyFour

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationalNameChange: Julia was given the last name of 'Dixon' in the 1954 BBC Adaptation. In the book, her last name is not revealed.

to:

* AdaptationalNameChange: Julia was given the last name of 'Dixon' in the 1954 BBC Adaptation and "Bellow" in the 2024 Audible Adaptation. In the book, her last name is not revealed.



* NoFullNameGiven: Her last name is never revealed (though the 1954 BBC adaptation gives it as Dixon).

to:

* NoFullNameGiven: Her last name is never revealed (though the 1954 BBC adaptation gives it as Dixon).Dixon and 2024 Audible adaptation gives it as Bellow).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-> ''' Voiced by:''' Creator/DavidNiven (1949 NBC Radio Adaptation), Creator/PatrickTroughton (1965 BBC Radio Adaptation), Creator/ChristopherEccleston (2013 BBC Radio Adaptation)


to:

-> ''' Voiced by:''' Creator/DavidNiven (1949 NBC Radio Adaptation), Creator/PatrickTroughton (1965 BBC Radio Adaptation), Creator/ChristopherEccleston (2013 BBC Radio Adaptation) Creator/AndrewGarfield (2024 Audible Adaptation)




-> ''' Portrayed by:''' Norma Crane (1953 CBS TV Adaptation), Yvonne Mitchell (1954 BBC TV adaptation), Creator/JanSterling (1956 film adaptation), Suzanna Hamilton (1984 film adaptation), Creator/OliviaWilde (2017 Broadway Adaptation)

to:

-> ''' Portrayed by:''' Norma Crane (1953 CBS TV Adaptation), Yvonne Mitchell (1954 BBC TV adaptation), Creator/JanSterling (1956 film adaptation), Suzanna Hamilton (1984 film adaptation), Creator/OliviaWilde (2017 Broadway Adaptation), Creator/CynthiaErivo (2024 Audible Adaptation)



-> ''' Portrayed by:''' Creator/LorneGreene (1953 CBS TV Adaptation), Andre Morell (1954 BBC TV adaptation), Creator/MichaelRedgrave (1956 film adaptation), Creator/RichardBurton (1984 film adaptation), Creator/ReedBirney (2017 Broadway adaptation)

to:

-> ''' Portrayed by:''' Creator/LorneGreene (1953 CBS TV Adaptation), Andre Morell (1954 BBC TV adaptation), Creator/MichaelRedgrave (1956 film adaptation), Creator/RichardBurton (1984 film adaptation), Creator/ReedBirney (2017 Broadway adaptation), Creator/AndrewScott (2024 Audible adaptation)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwfulWeddedLife: With his legal, Party-assigned wife.

to:

* AwfulWeddedLife: With his legal, Party-assigned wife. wife, who Winston comes to regret not killing when he had the perfect opportunity to MakeItLookLikeAnAccident.

Added: 440

Changed: 162

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AtLeastIAdmitIt: O'Brien says that what distinguishes the Party from previous totalitarian regimes is that while leaders there claimed and many even believed that their oppressive actions and cruelty were for a greater purpose, the Party and it's members make no secret of the fact that their only goal is gaining more and more power solely for it's own sake and with the intent of making life miserable for everyone, themselves included.



* ControlFreak: The Party is a whole ''ideology'' of this. Thoughtcrime in general is the crime of not being controlled by the Party.

to:

* ControlFreak: The Party is a whole ''ideology'' of this. Thoughtcrime in general is the crime of not being controlled by the Party.Party and they are obsessed not simply with killing their opponents but making them utterly devout believers, not even granting them the dignity of dying as themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)


* CardCarryingVillain: One of the most chilling examples in all of media. The Party doesn't have any goals beyond absolute power and suffering of everyone, even it's supporters, as proof of it's power and O'Brien openly admits their vision of the world is one that is as cruel, cynical and outright miserable as it's possible to be.

to:

* CardCarryingVillain: One of the most chilling examples in all of media. The Party doesn't have any goals beyond absolute power and suffering of everyone, even it's its supporters, as proof of it's its power and O'Brien openly admits their vision of the world is one that is as cruel, cynical and outright miserable as it's possible to be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HordesFromTheEast: {{Invoked}} in Oceania's propaganda against them, which always depicts the army of their current enemy as an endless column of men with identical, expressionless, "asiatic" faces.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheOmniscient: For all intents and purposes of the story (and certainly from Winston's perspective), he - and by extension the Party - is this. Regardless of what Winston did and no matter how obscure, he has intimate knowledge of it; and regardless of what Winston thinks, he has already had the very same thought and is aware of what goes through Wintson's head.

to:

* TheOmniscient: For all intents and purposes of the story (and certainly from Winston's perspective), he - and by extension the Party - is this. Regardless of what Winston did and no matter how obscure, he has intimate knowledge of it; and regardless of what Winston thinks, he has already had the very same thought and is aware of what goes through Wintson's Winston's head.

Added: 515

Changed: 192

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BreadAndCircuses: The Party keeps the proles (relatively) in line with trashy media and lotteries alongside propaganda. Anyone smart enough to see through those, however, is taken care of by the Thought Police.

to:

* BreadAndCircuses: BreadAndCircuses:
**
The Party keeps the proles (relatively) in line with trashy media and lotteries alongside propaganda. Anyone smart enough to see through those, however, is taken care of by the Thought Police.Police.
** Inner Party members keep ''themselves'' placated simply by enjoying better standards of living when not enforcing power. They have access to servants, well-maintained infrastructure, and luxuries such as wine which, while not as extravagant as before Ingsoc's existence, are nigh-''unattainable'' for the Outer Party.

Added: 272

Changed: 159

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AmbiguouslyEvil: We never actually see either of them, so it is hard to say what morality they are. That Eurasia fights against Oceania at first might make them seem good, but then they ally with Oceania while Eastasia turns on them, hinting they may not be so selfless or good. Its suggested by Goldstein's book that all of them are evil and in cahoots using the war to control their citizens. However, the fact that INGSOC wrote the book makes it decidedly unreliable.

to:

* AmbiguouslyEvil: We never actually see either of them, so it is hard to say what morality they are. That Eurasia fights against Oceania at first might make them seem good, but then they ally with Oceania while Eastasia turns on them, hinting they may not be so selfless or good. Its It's suggested by Goldstein's book that all of them are evil and in cahoots using the war to control their citizens. However, the fact O'Brien's claim that INGSOC wrote the book makes it decidedly unreliable.



* DystopiaJustifiesTheMeans: If Goldstein's book can be trusted, both of them participate with Oceania in "using up the produce of the machine" through endless war so that their people can never become comfortable and self-sufficient enough to overthrow their governments.



* TheGhost: Much like Big Brother, we never see anyone from either of the two nations, making it hard to say if they even exist. All the information about them comes from either INGSOC propaganda or Goldstein's book, which was fabricated by O'Brien.

to:

* TheGhost: Much like Big Brother, we never see anyone from either of the two nations, making it hard to say if they even exist. All the information about them comes from either INGSOC propaganda or Goldstein's book, which was fabricated by O'Brien.O'Brien claims to have helped fabricate.



* NotSoDifferentRemark: Oceania may be bad, but it's claimed in Goldstein's book that the two other superstates are almost ''exactly identical'' to it, with the story implying that this is one of the things the book is right about. They are always at war with each other, with [[ForeverWar nobody ever winning]]. If you live in one of the areas the three states are always fighting over, you are a slave in both body and mind to whoever has power over the area at the current time. It is heavily [[ImpliedTrope implied]] that an unspoken gentleman's agreement exists between the three states that they will never make a serious effort to destroy the others -- this is the reason no state ever uses mass conscription or [=WMDs=] -- because the war is part of the EvilPlan for the three of them to keep the standard of living down and mobilize the hatred of the population. Goldstein's book even mentions that Oceania could probably conquer all of Europe up to the [[UsefulNotes/{{Poland}} Polish]] frontier, or that Eastasia could likely seize Australia, but that neither state does so for fear of upsetting the BalanceOfPower. In accordance with this, the fighting -- if any is even happening -- is confined to a territory roughly encompassing most of Africa (apart from the portion controlled by Oceania), the Middle East, the Indian Subcontinent and Southeast Asia; the open oceans; and the polar caps.

to:

* NotSoDifferentRemark: Oceania may be bad, but it's claimed in Goldstein's book that the two other superstates are almost ''exactly identical'' to it, with the story implying that this is one of the things the book is right about. They are always at war with each other, with [[ForeverWar nobody ever winning]]. If you live in one of the areas the three states are always fighting over, you are a slave in both body and mind to whoever has power over the area at the current time. It is heavily [[ImpliedTrope implied]] that an unspoken gentleman's agreement exists between the three states that they will never make a serious effort to destroy the others -- this is the reason no state ever uses mass conscription or [=WMDs=] -- because the war is part of the EvilPlan for the three of them to keep the standard of living down and mobilize the hatred of the population. Goldstein's book even mentions that Oceania could probably conquer all of Europe up to the [[UsefulNotes/{{Poland}} Polish]] frontier, or that Eastasia could likely seize Australia, but that neither state does so for fear of upsetting the BalanceOfPower. In accordance with this, the fighting -- if any is even happening -- is confined to a territory roughly encompassing most of Africa (apart from the portion controlled by Oceania), the Middle East, the Indian Subcontinent and Southeast Asia; the open oceans; and the polar caps.caps, whose inhabitants are all outright slaves no matter who's momentarily in control of their territory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* RuleAbidingRebel: Deconstructed. Julia is much less interested in the intellectual aspects of rebellion than Winston, who jokingly suggests (and she implicitly agrees) that her rebellion is only "from the waist down" when she gets bored and wants to have sex while he's trying to dig into the philosophy of the thing. She's more interested in having fun in a culture where most forms of fun are countercultural. But unfortunately for her, it turns out [[AllCrimesAreEqual the state doesn't care how half-hearted, shallow, or meaningless her rebellion really is]].

Added: 272

Changed: 1175

Removed: 31

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheGhost: Big Brother himself never actually makes an in-person appearance in the novel; It's left ambiguous as to whether he ever even actually existed as a real person.
* GloriousLeader: He's presented by in-universe propaganda as Oceania's savior and the ideal leader.



* TheGhost: Big Brother himself never actually makes an in-person appearance in the novel; It's left ambiguous as to whether he ever even actually existed as a real person.
* IronicNickname: Big Brother himself. The friendly, protective family member stereotype is so completely subsumed by the bullying one that, due to the novel's term being a pervasive AscendedMeme in its own right, the term on its own has no meaning: you can't tell whether someone's using it affectionately or making a reference to ''1984'' without context. Further perverted, as noted by Winston, in that the Party is deliberately breaking down family bonds, as can be seen with his neighbor being handed to the Thought Police by his children.
* InventedIndividual: Possibly.

to:

* TheGhost: Big Brother himself never actually makes an in-person appearance in the novel; It's left ambiguous as to whether he ever even actually existed as a real person.
* IronicNickname: Big Brother himself. The friendly, protective family member stereotype is so completely subsumed by the bullying one that, due to the novel's term being a pervasive AscendedMeme in its own right, the term on its own has no meaning: you can't tell whether someone's using it affectionately or making a reference to ''1984'' without context. Further perverted, as noted by Winston, in that the Party is deliberately breaking down family bonds, as can be seen with his neighbor being handed to the Thought Police by his own children.
* InventedIndividual: Possibly. The book never makes it clear if Big Brother actually exists as a person or was created by the Party. It's also possible that he ''was'' real, but is dead by the time the story takes place, which [[OfCorpseHesAlive the Party refuses to acknowledge]].



* NoCelebritiesWereHarmed: He is a clear {{expy}} of UsefulNotes/JosefStalin, being the leader of the Soviet-like Oceania with a cult of personality.

to:

* NoCelebritiesWereHarmed: He is a clear {{expy}} of UsefulNotes/JosefStalin, being the leader of the Soviet-like Oceania with a cult of personality. His physical description even ''looks'' a good deal like Stalin.

Added: 663

Changed: 837

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* StrawmanHasAPoint: [[invoked]] A rare in-universe example; despite the party's constant vilification of him, many of the things he advocates for are entirely reasonable, like more freedom for Oceania's people.

to:

* SharpDressedMan: The Radford adaptation has Goldstein wearing a crisp three-piece suit and bowtie which, while not all that unusual for an intellectual, makes him stand out all the more from the jumpsuit-donning members of the Party.
* StrawmanHasAPoint: [[invoked]] A rare in-universe example; despite the party's Party's constant vilification of him, many of the things he advocates for are entirely reasonable, like more freedom for Oceania's people.



* LongGame: The Brotherhood, it’s claimed, is unable to launch an open rebellion against Oceania, so instead tries to undermine the regime through subversive actions, however insignificant or cruel. With the hope that sooner or later, even if it takes a thousand years, the Party could finally be defeated. This is implied, however, to simply be a ploy by the Inner Party to make thought criminals’ myriad crimes seem more believable.

to:

* ArsonMurderAndJaywalking: Many of the Brotherhood's subversive "crimes" can come across as outright petty, up to and including ''cheating''. It's rationalized as due to being unable to openly stage a rebellion and as part of a [[LongGame long-term campaign that might take generations to see fruition]], though it's also implied to be a glorified ruse by the Inner Party.
* LongGame: The Brotherhood, it’s claimed, is unable to launch an open rebellion against Oceania, so instead tries to undermine the regime through subversive actions, however insignificant or cruel. With the hope that sooner or later, even if it takes a thousand years, the Party could finally be defeated. This is implied, however, to simply be a ploy by the Inner Party to make thought criminals’ myriad crimes seem more believable.believable if not meaningful.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AffablyEvil: He's pretty affable for a party fanatic, even asking Wilson at one point if he watched a public hanging in the same tone as if it was a football match.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ChildProdigy: He's smart enough as a child that he joins the Spies a year earlier than is standard.


Added DiffLines:

* TroublingUnchildlikeBehavior: To the reader, even if he's designed to be an ideal offspring to Oceania residents, having no purpose in life beyond service to Big Brother.
* UndyingLoyalty: He's described as having had seemingly no goal in life beyond absolute service to Big Brother, having no interest whatsoever in friends, family or hobbies of any kind.

Added: 332

Changed: 10

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheSociopath: O'Brien, a totalitarian dictatorship's agent who pretends to be a rebel leader so he can lure potential rebels to be tortured, and admits that all the Party wants is power.

to:

* TheSociopath: O'Brien, He's a totalitarian dictatorship's agent who pretends to be a rebel leader so he can lure potential rebels to be tortured, and admits that all the Party wants is power.


Added DiffLines:

* CardCarryingVillain: One of the most chilling examples in all of media. The Party doesn't have any goals beyond absolute power and suffering of everyone, even it's supporters, as proof of it's power and O'Brien openly admits their vision of the world is one that is as cruel, cynical and outright miserable as it's possible to be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheMole: Averted - although he pretends to be an agent of the Brotherhood who's infiltrated the ranks of the Inner Party, he's actually completely loyal to the Party and it's his job to entrap dissidents this way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AmbiguousSituation: It's never made clear if he even actually exists as a person, as title, or if he's just a face that The Party invented to direct their CultOfPersonality towards.

to:

* AmbiguousSituation: It's never made clear if he even actually exists as a person, as title, person or if he's just a face that The Party invented to direct their CultOfPersonality towards.

Top